Mike Galsworthy

Last updated

On 8 May 2015, the day after the UK general election 2015, Galsworthy co-founded the pro-EU research advocacy group Scientists for EU with fellow scientist Rob Davidson. [13] [14]

Galsworthy articulated two concerns that Scientists for EU aimed to address: "first, a lack of clarity and cohesion within the community on EU benefits and Brexit risks; and, secondly, a lack of public understanding on the UK/EU relationship in science." [15] His decision to found the organization was driven by his reaction to the tone and content of the Brexit debate, which he described as a "colossal, nationwide rejection of expert opinion" fostered by "media... focused on the political soap opera, not the facts". [16] Prior to the referendum, Scientists for EU became a high-profile organisation presenting the case for EU membership. [17]

In March 2016, Galsworthy presented evidence on the impact of EU membership on UK science to the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. [15] [18] Galsworthy answered questions about the balance between structural and competitive EU funding for science, the effectiveness of EU science collaborations, and the potential loss of influence over EU scientific regulations after Brexit. [15] Commenting on the committee's report in April 2016, Galsworthy stated that the EU science programme offered "huge added value" to the UK and "the overwhelming balance of opinion is for remaining in." [19]

Following the referendum, Galsworthy's immediate priority was to document its impact on the UK science community. [11] Around 350 scientists contacted Galsworthy in relation to the future of British science after Brexit, most of whom expressed concerns about the future of research in the UK. [20] [21] [22] For some, xenophobia was a significant concern. [20] [21] Galsworthy concluded, "It is clear that the UK has overnight become less attractive as a place to do science." [22]

Galsworthy has continued to lobby and inform politicians and others about the negative consequences of a hard Brexit for science, including the loss of freedom of movement and the loss of influence over EU policies. [23]

Despite the referendum result, in Galsworthy's view Scientists for EU has been successful in raising the profile of science in UK politics. [11] In the 2017 United Kingdom general election both the Labour Party and Conservative Party election manifestos committed to raising the budget for research and development to 3 percent of gross domestic product. In Galsworthy's view, "This is a big step up from the general election of 2015 where science didn't feature. I think the referendum really helped push that onto the agenda." [24]

In August 2018, Scientists for EU highlighted to the media that, in the event of a no-deal Brexit, the UK would lose its eligibility for three of the EU's major funding programmes. According to Galsworthy, this would mean "losing over half a billion [euros] a year in high value grants". [25]

In a profile in Nature in September 2018, Galsworthy said that Scientists for EU had changed its focus: Instead of representing the interests of British science in the Brexit negotiations, it was partnering with People's Vote to prevent Brexit altogether. The change was motivated by the diminishing window of time for negotiations and the increasing likelihood of a no-deal Brexit. [26]

Healthier IN the EU

Together with Rob Davidson and Martin McKee, [27] Galsworthy co-founded Healthier IN the EU, [28] a grassroots organization making the health case for continued EU membership. [29] [30]

Galsworthy and McKee co-authored an analysis of the effects of Brexit on the NHS, published in The Lancet , that predicted negative consequences for healthcare in Britain under every scenario. [31]

Media

Galsworthy appears in the anti-Brexit documentary film Postcards from the 48% (2018). [32] [33]

Political views

Galsworthy is affiliated with the Labour Party. [34]

According to a profile in Der Standard , Galsworthy "persistently seeks clarification and sees it as a central science mission in the era of fake news." [9]

He has described President of the United States Donald Trump as "a dictator in American caricature form". [35]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Movement UK</span> Pro-Europe pressure group

The European Movement UK is an independent all-party pressure group in the United Kingdom which campaigns for a close relationship with the European Union, and to ensure that European values, standards, and rights are upheld in British law post-Brexit. It is part of the European Movement International which pushes for a "democratic, federal, enlarged European Union". It is the most prominent pro-Europe group in Britain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum</span> Referendum on leaving the European Union

On 23 June 2016, a referendum took place in the United Kingdom (UK) and Gibraltar to ask the electorate whether the country should remain a member of, or leave, the European Union (EU). The result was to leave, triggering calls to begin the process of the country's withdrawal from the EU commonly termed "Brexit".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brexit</span> UK withdrawal from the European Union (2020)

Brexit was the withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU). Following a referendum held on 23 June 2016, Brexit officially took place at 23:00 GMT on 31 January 2020. The UK is the only sovereign country to have left the EU. The UK had been a member state of the EU or its predecessor, the European Communities (EC), since 1 January 1973. Following Brexit, EU law and the Court of Justice of the European Union no longer have primacy over British laws. The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 retains relevant EU law as domestic law, which the UK can amend or repeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vote Leave</span> Campaign for UK withdrawal from the EU

Vote Leave was a campaigning organisation that supported a "Leave" vote in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum. On 13 April 2016 it was designated by the Electoral Commission as the official campaign in favour of leaving the European Union in the Referendum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum</span>

The referendum on EU membership took place on 23 June 2016. Opinion polling for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum was ongoing in the months between the announcement of a referendum and the referendum polling day. Polls on the general principle of the UK's membership of the European Union were carried out for a number of years prior to the referendum. Opinion polls of voters in general tended to show roughly equal proportions in favour of remaining and leaving. Polls of business leaders, scientists, and lawyers showed majorities in favour of remaining. Among non-British citizens in other EU member states, polling suggested that a majority were in favour of the UK remaining in the EU in principle, but that a similarly sized majority believed that if the UK were only able to remain in the EU on renegotiated terms then it should leave.

A number of politicians, public figures, newspapers and magazines, businesses and other organisations endorsed either the United Kingdom remaining in the EU or the United Kingdom leaving the EU during the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.

Issues in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum are the economic, human and political issues that were discussed during the campaign about the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, during the period leading up to the Brexit referendum of 23 June 2016. [Issues that have arisen since then are outside the scope of this article].

After the British EU membership referendum held on 23 June 2016, in which a majority voted to leave the European Union, the United Kingdom experienced political and economic upsets, with spillover effects across the rest of the European Union and the wider world. Prime Minister David Cameron, who had campaigned for Remain, announced his resignation on 24 June, triggering a Conservative leadership election, won by Home Secretary Theresa May. Following Leader of the Opposition Jeremy Corbyn's loss of a motion of no confidence among the Parliamentary Labour Party, he also faced a leadership challenge, which he won. Nigel Farage stepped down from leadership of the pro-Leave party UKIP in July. After the elected party leader resigned, Farage then became the party's interim leader on 5 October until Paul Nuttall was elected leader on 28 November.

The result in favour of Brexit of the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum is one of the most significant political events for Britain during the 21st century. The debate provoked major consideration to an array of topics, argued up-to, and beyond, the referendum on 23 June 2016. The referendum was originally conceived by David Cameron as a means to defeat the anti-EU faction within his own party by having it fail, but he misjudged the level of public support for leaving, particularly amongst Labour Party voters. Factors included sovereignty, immigration, the economy and anti-establishment politics, amongst various other influences. The result of the referendum was that 51.8% of the votes were in favour of leaving the European Union. The formal withdrawal from the EU took place at 23:00 on 31 January 2020, almost three years after Theresa May triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty on 29 March 2017. This page provides an overarching analysis of the different arguments which were presented by both the Leave and Remain campaigns.

Brexit and arrangements for science and technology refers to arrangements affecting scientific research, experimental development and innovation that are within the scope of the negotiations between the United Kingdom and the European Union on the terms of Britain's withdrawal from the European Union (EU).

The effect of Brexit on Gibraltar concerns the status of Gibraltar after the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union ("Brexit"). The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020, having formally notified the EU in March 2017 of its intention to do so. Gibraltar is not part of the UK, but unlike all other British Overseas Territories, it was a part of the European Union along with the UK. It participated in the Brexit referendum and it ceased, by default, to be a part of the EU upon the UK's withdrawal.

The economic effects of Brexit were a major area of debate during and after the referendum on UK membership of the European Union. The majority of economists believe that Brexit has harmed the UK's economy and reduced its real per capita income in the long term, and the referendum itself damaged the economy. It is likely to produce a large decline in immigration from countries in the European Economic Area (EEA) to the UK, and poses challenges for British higher education and academic research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Best for Britain</span> Civil society campaign to fight Brexit

Best for Britain is a civil society campaign formed of researchers, data scientists, strategists, and activists who say that they are working to fix "the problems Britain faces after Brexit". Originally launched on 26 April 2017 to stop Brexit and continue the UK's membership of the European Union (EU), the organisation's aim since 2021 has been strengthening UK-EU ties as well as protecting democratic rights within the UK.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom membership of the European Union</span> Period of the United Kingdom being a member state of the European Union

The United Kingdom was a member state of the European Union (EU) and of its predecessor the European Communities (EC) – principally the European Economic Community (EEC) from 1 January 1973 until 31 January 2020. Since the foundation of the EEC, the UK had been an important neighbour and then leading member state, until Brexit ended 47 years of membership. During the UK's time as a member state two referendums were held on the issue of its membership, with the first being held on 5 June 1975, resulting in a vote to stay in the EC, and the second, held on 23 June 2016, which resulted in the vote to leave the EU.

Russian interference in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum is a debated subject and remains unproven, though multiple sources argue evidence exists demonstrating that the Russian government attempted to influence British public opinion in favour of leaving the European Union. Investigations into this subject have been undertaken by the UK Electoral Commission, the UK Parliament's Culture Select Committee and Intelligence and Security Committee, and the United States Senate. "The Russia Report" published by the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament in July 2020 did not specifically address the Brexit campaign, but it concluded that Russian interference in UK politics is commonplace. It also found substantial evidence that there had been interference in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum.

Since the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union in the 2016 referendum, a number of demonstrations have taken place and organisations formed whose goal has been to oppose, reverse or otherwise impede that decision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proposed referendum on the Brexit withdrawal agreement</span> Proposed referendum on the Brexit withdrawal agreement

A referendum on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, also referred to as a "second referendum", a "rerun", a "people's vote", or a "confirmatory public vote", was proposed by a number of politicians and pressure groups as a way to break the deadlock during the 2017–19 Parliament surrounding the meaningful vote on the Brexit deal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predicted impact of Brexit</span> Predicted long-term effects of Brexit

This article outlines the predicted impact of Brexit, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU) and the European Atomic Energy Community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pro-EU leaflet</span> 2016 UK Government pamphlet

"Why the Government Believes That Voting to Remain in the European Union is the Best Decision for the UK" was a one-off pamphlet created in April 2016 by the government of the United Kingdom. The leaflet was created in anticipation of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum in June, which would ask the British public whether the UK should leave the EU. After internal polling revealed that 85 per cent of the public wanted more information before making their decision, Prime Minister David Cameron announced that the government would send a leaflet to households across the UK, explaining why remaining in the EU was the best choice for the UK. The leaflets were paid for by British taxpayers at a cost of £9.3 million, and were delivered across the UK in two waves: the first to households in England, and the second to households in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

References

  1. ↑ "Over and Out". Novara Media. 31 January 2020. Event occurs at 37:21. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  2. ↑ Galsworthy, Mike (24 December 2015). "Convinced by arguments to leave the EU? Consider the damage a Brexit would do to British science" . The Independent . Archived from the original on 14 May 2022.
  3. ↑ Galsworthy, Mike (1 June 2016). "In a world of cross-border cooperation, Brexit will harm the UK". New Scientist .
  4. ↑ "One Student's View". Aps Observer. 16 (6). 20 June 2003. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  5. ↑ "Who we are". Scientists for EU. Retrieved 1 February 2020.
  6. ↑ Galsworthy, Michael John (2003). A psychometric and quantitative genetic study of cognitive task performance in a heterogeneous stock (hs) population of MUS musculus (PhD thesis). King's College London. OCLC   59182506.
  7. ↑ Staff writer (17 July 2013). "Spotlight on Mike Galsworthy". UCL News. University College London . Retrieved 12 July 2018. This week the spotlight is on Dr Mike Galsworthy, Senior Research Associate in the Department of Applied Health Research (DAHR)
  8. ↑ Wilsdon, James (14 July 2016). "Six leading scientists give perspectives on UK science after Brexit". The Guardian . Retrieved 12 July 2018.
  9. 1 2 Illetschko, Peter (31 January 2018). "Fakten gegen die britische Gerüchte-Politik" [Facts against British rumor politics]. Der Standard (in German). Retrieved 29 July 2018. versucht es Galsworthy beharrlich mit Aufklärung und sieht das auch als eine zentrale Aufgabe der Wissenschaft in Zeiten von Fake-News
  10. ↑ Galsworthy, Michael (17 May 2013). "Profile". The Conversation .
  11. 1 2 3 Abbott, Alison; Callaway, Ewen; Cressey, Daniel; Gibney, Elizabeth; Vesper, Inga (2017). "How Brexit is changing the lives of eight researchers". Nature. 543 (7647): 600–601. Bibcode:2017Natur.543..600A. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.21714 . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   28358097. S2CID   4452761.
  12. ↑ "European Movement announces new Chair".
  13. ↑ "Who we are". scientistsforeu.uk. Scientists for EU. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
  14. ↑ Stone, Emma (13 October 2015). "Scientists launch campaign to oppose UK exit from EU". Chemistry World . Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  15. 1 2 3 Mike Galsworthy, Programme Director, Scientists for EU; et al. (1 March 2016). "The Relationship between EU Membership and the Effectiveness of UK Science: Oral Evidence Session". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . United Kingdom: House of Lords, Select Committee on Science and Technology. Video.
  16. ↑ Gatehouse, Jonathon (8 June 2016). "Brexit vs Bremain: It's decision time". Maclean's .
  17. ↑ Finn, Mike (2018). British Universities in the Brexit Moment: Political, Economic and Cultural Implications. Emerald Group Publishing. p. 18. ISBN   978-1-78743-743-2.
  18. ↑ "How does EU membership influence UK science? Lords Committee hears from referendum science campaign groups". www.parliament.uk. 26 February 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  19. ↑ Rincon, Paul (20 April 2016). "Concern over Brexit's impact on science". BBC News . Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  20. 1 2 Johnston, Ian (12 July 2016). "Racist, xenophobic and anti-intellectual: Academics threaten to leave Brexit Britain" . The Independent . Archived from the original on 14 May 2022. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
  21. 1 2 Hutton, Will (16 July 2016). "Why Brexit may be a deadly experiment for science" . Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  22. 1 2 Cookson, Clive (9 August 2016). "Brexit Briefing: Scientists feel the effect". The Financial Times . Retrieved 1 August 2018.
  23. ↑ Foster, Peter (2 September 2016). "Why the Remainers are still clinging on to dreams of overturning Brexit...and how they hope to do it". The Daily Telegraph . Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  24. ↑ Burke, Maria (23 May 2017). "R&D election funding pledges put research at heart of UK economy". Chemistry World . Retrieved 3 August 2018.
  25. ↑ Shukman, David (25 August 2018). "No-deal Brexit 'worse than thought' for science". BBC . Retrieved 3 September 2018.
  26. ↑ Masood, Ehsan; Vesper, Inga; Van Noorden, Richard (2018). "Six months to Brexit: how scientists are preparing for the split". Nature. 561 (7724). Springer Nature America, Inc: 452–454. Bibcode:2018Natur.561..452M. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06781-8 . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   30258165.
  27. ↑ O'Dowd, Adrian (2016). "UK exit from EU would be serious threat to science and healthcare, experts warn". BMJ. 352: i1117. doi:10.1136/bmj.i1117. ISSN   1756-1833. PMID   26908135. S2CID   28876902.
  28. ↑ Lynskey, Dorian (28 April 2018). "'It's not a done deal': inside the battle to stop Brexit". The Guardian . Retrieved 12 July 2018.
  29. ↑ "About Us". Healthier IN the EU. Archived from the original on 12 July 2018. Retrieved 18 August 2019.
  30. ↑ Marsh, Stefanie (6 October 2017). "A Harsh Wake-Up Call for Some Brexiteers". The Atlantic . Retrieved 29 July 2018.
  31. ↑ Fahy, Nick; Hervey, Tamara; Greer, Scott; Jarman, Holly; Stuckler, David; Galsworthy, Mike; McKee, Martin (2017). "How will Brexit affect health and health services in the UK? Evaluating three possible scenarios" (PDF). The Lancet. 390 (10107): 2110–2118. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31926-8. ISSN   0140-6736. PMID   28965715. S2CID   24369348.
  32. ↑ Wilkinson, David (Director) (6 July 2018). Postcards from the 48% (Documentary). London: Guerilla Docs / Postcard Films. Retrieved 7 July 2018.
  33. ↑ Postcards from the 48% (2018) at IMDb OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
  34. ↑ Galsworthy, Mike (18 February 2014). "Eurosceptics could damage British science and innovation". The Guardian .
  35. ↑ Leftly, Mark (27 January 2017). "Not Everyone in the U.K. Is Overjoyed About May's Meeting with Trump". Time . Retrieved 29 July 2018.
Mike Galsworthy
MikeGalsworthy.jpg
Born
Michael John Galsworthy

1976 (age 47–48) [1]
London, England
NationalityBritish
Occupation(s)Programme Director of Scientists for EU, Visiting Researcher London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Known forCo-founder of Scientists for EU and Healthier IN the EU
Academic background
Alma mater University of Cambridge
King's College London
Thesis A psychometric and quantitative genetic study of cognitive task performance in a heterogeneous stock (hs) population of MUS musculus  (2003)
Member organisations
People
Related
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.