Moses sees Rabbi Akiva (Menachot 29b)

Last updated

Moses sees Rabbi Akiva teaching the Oral Torah, and later meeting his fate at the hands of the Romans, in a sugya (passage) in the Babylonian Talmud. The sugya appears in tractate Menachot (29b), which generally deals with Temple offerings. Jewish commentaries have drawn many lessons from this story, on topics ranging from rabbinic authority to interpretive innovation to the justification of human suffering (theodicy).

Contents

Context and summary

The sugya assumes familiarity with several aspects of rabbinic beliefs and practice. The opening assumes that God reveals the Torah to Moses at Mount Sinai and that this revelation incorporates the Oral Torah of rabbinic teachings, not just the written scripture of the Hebrew Bible. The opening also refers to the "crowns" (tagim) on letters for the calligraphy of a Torah scroll. Readers are expected to know that Rabbi Akiva, a leading sage of the early rabbinic period, was known for his interpretive creativity, and that he was one of the ten martyrs who were tortured and killed by Romans during the Bar Kokhba revolt. Finally, it is helpful to know that there is a category of Jewish law that is authoritative because it is said to be a law given to Moses at Sinai. [1] [2]

Three stylized yod letters in an illustrated Haggadah. At its tip, there are three yod letters in typical calligraphy. Yod for the divine name.jpg
Three stylized yod letters in an illustrated Haggadah. At its tip, there are three yod letters in typical calligraphy.

The immediate context for the story is a discussion of scribal writing and, as scholars have noted, a mishnah about what prevents (me'akev) proper writing of a mezuzah parchment, along with a statement by Rabbi Yehudah about the kotz (thorn or tip) of the letter yodh. [3]

In this Talmudic sugya, Rav Yehudah narrates the story, which can be summarized as follows: When Moses ascended into heaven (or Mount Sinai), he saw God preoccupied with making ornamental "crowns" (tagim) for the letters of the scriptural Torah. When Moses inquired what prevents (me'akev) God from giving the Torah and instead making these embellishments. God explained that a man named Akiva ben Yosef would be born, in a future generation, and that he would derive "heaps" of halakha (Jewish laws) from "each and every thorn" (kotz) on Torah letters. Moses requested that he be allowed to see this sage, and God assented: suddenly, Moses found himself sitting in Akiva's beit midrash or study hall. As Moses listened to Akiva's teachings about the Torah, he grew weary or dismayed, because (ironically) Moses could not understand it. However, when one of the students asked Akiva for the source of his teaching, Akiva replied that it was a "law given to Moses at Sinai", so Moses was put at ease. Upon returning to God, Moses asks why he was given the Torah and not the great Rabbi Akiva. God tells him to be silent, it arose in God's mind that way. Then Moses then asks to see Akiva's ultimate reward, so God shows Moses the grisly aftermath of Akiva's execution. Horrified, Moses demands God explain His actions, at which point God again tells Moses to be silent because that's how it came to mind for God. [4] [5]

In the story, the word kotz has usually been translated as thorn or thistle. However, lexicography scholar Shlomo Naeh traced it to a rare word for biblical pericope (a unit of verses). [3]

The word me'akev (prevents) is also out of place, since Jewish law would ordinarily use the term to invalidate (posul) the parchment. [3]

Academic and religious responses

Jeffrey Rubenstein says that this narrative stands out because it breaks through the usual separation, in rabbinic literature, between Biblical and post-Biblical characters. [2]

The narrative presumes a belief in reward and punishment and, says Rubenstein, it pivots around God telling Moses to be silent. This sugya implies that humans cannot comprehend suffering, such as Akiva's, though the lesson is obscure, "is the story a failed theodicy, or a protest against the unjust suffering of the righteous?" [6]

According to Louis Ginzberg, "this story gives in naive style a picture of Akiba's activity as the father of Talmudical Judaism." [4] The style is packed with alliterative and other poetic features, along with a literary structure that arguably reflects the tension between authority and interpretive innovation. [2] [7] Moses encounters Akiva as a teacher and as a martyr, in two parallel parts of the sugya. [2]

Revelation and rabbinic authority

The story of Moses seeing Akiba deals with the broadening of Jewish teachings beyond revealed scripture, the Hebrew Bible, with a self-conscious attention to how far rabbinic exegesis has gone, as discussed by Rubenstein. David Weiss Halivni sees the sugya as an exemplar of a minimalist position on divine revelation, leaving space for rabbinic interpretation. He states the story is often misunderstood:

Though this story is sometimes interpreted to support the claim that each succeeding generation has an equal share in revelation, and that contemporary exegesis is not beholden to the past, it actually expresses the contrary notion that the arguments and details worked out by scholars like R. Akiba were grounded upon principles that had been revealed to Moses at Sinai. [8]

Kromhout and Zwiep (p. 145) see the sugya as justifying the rabbi's "maximum freedom in developing Jewish law" by opening up the distance between revelation at Sinai and midrash (interpretation), though Jewish thinkers such as Semuel da Silva viewed God as the direct author of both Written and Oral Torah. [9]

Satirizing or promoting interpretation?

Daniel Boyarin and Yair Furstenberg argue that the sugya, when Moses sees Rabbi Akiva, is to be read in light of ancient Greek satire from the Second Sophistic period, especially with the bewilderment of Moses at Akiva's implausible interpretations. [10] The satire reading may be undermined by noticing other Talmudic texts that portray Moses as prone to misunderstanding, not to mention the gruesome ending, which is far from comic. [3]

Instead, Azzan Yadin-Israel connects the sugya, and the confounded Moses, to the motif of the "ignorant messenger" in later Biblical prophets, such as Jeremiah, Zechariah, and Daniel. This humbling of prophetic knowledge is combined, according to Yadin-Israel, with the valorization of interpreters such as Rabbi Akiva in the Menachot 29b sugya and elsewhere ( Hagigah 15b and Numbers Rabbah 19.6). [3] Moreover, he suggests that the sugya, when Moses sees Rabbi Akiva, reflects a shift after tannaitic (early rabbinic) literature to revalue interpretation in the Talmudic period. [3]

As a classic text about Jewish interpretation, the Menachot 29b sugya also has been used to illustrate the shift to interpretation in Jewish "epoch-making events," such as the Shoah. [11]

Cross-cultural comparisons

The visit of Moses to see Akiba has been compared to Christian narratives that have Moses going to teach Church fathers in the desert. [12] More narrowly, the "crowns" in Jewish calligraphy have been compared to those in ancient Coptic and Greek writing. [13] A German scholar of religious studies, Holger Zellentin, compares Menachot 29b to Christian stories of the transfiguration of Jesus, which typically showed Jesus as superior to Moses, sometimes with an anti-Jewish tone. The rabbinic counter-narrative quietly alludes to its Christological parallel and it sets up Akiva as "a messianic figure, but not the Messiah; and he is martyred and his body consumed, but he is not yet resurrected." [14] Zellentin sees the story as teaching about silence in the face of incomprehensible acts of the divine. [14]

Contemporary Judaism

The story of Moses and Akiva has been grist for sermons. For example, politically conservative, Orthodox rabbi Meir Soloveitchik wrote about the sugya in a 2008 sermon with the idea that the Torah, with its detailed calligraphy, is an in-depth "love letter" from God to the Jewish people. [15] The sugya was also used in 2015 by politically liberal, Reform rabbi Angela Buchdahl, to support the notion that Jews have always been engaged in re-forming its tradition through interpretation. [16] A British rabbi, Sylvia Rothschild, quoted the sugya when giving a sermon at the Pinkas Synagogue in Prague, saying that just as Moses was puzzled by Akiva's approach, so her ancestor Pinchas Halevy Horowitz (16th C.) would not understand much of contemporary Judaism, though some aspects would be familiar. [17]

Related Research Articles

Halakha, also transliterated as halacha, halakhah, and halocho, is the collective body of Jewish religious laws that are derived from the Written and Oral Torah. Halakha is based on biblical commandments (mitzvot), subsequent Talmudic and rabbinic laws, and the customs and traditions which were compiled in the many books such as the Shulchan Aruch. Halakha is often translated as "Jewish law", although a more literal translation might be "the way to behave" or "the way of walking". The word is derived from the root which means "to behave". Halakha not only guides religious practices and beliefs; it also guides numerous aspects of day-to-day life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Torah</span> First five books of the Hebrew Bible

The Torah is the compilation of the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, namely the books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. In Christianity, the Torah is also known as the Pentateuch or the Five Books of Moses. In Rabbinical Jewish tradition it is also known as the Written Torah. If meant for liturgic purposes, it takes the form of a Torah scroll. If in bound book form, it is called Chumash, and is usually printed with the rabbinic commentaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jewish principles of faith</span>

Judaism does not centralize authority in any single individual or group. The formulation of principles of faith that are universally recognized by all branches of Judaism remains undefined. There is no central authority in Judaism in existence today - although the Sanhedrin, the supreme Jewish religious court, would fulfill this role if it were re-established. Instead, Judaism's principles of faith remain debated by the rabbis based on their understanding of the sacred writings, laws, and traditions, which collectively shape its theological and ethical framework. The most accepted version in extent is the opinion of Maimonides.

The Pharisees were a Jewish social movement and a school of thought in the Levant during the time of Second Temple Judaism. Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group does not exist anymore, their traditions are considered important among all various Jewish religious movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rabbi Akiva</span> Jewish scholar and sage (c. 50 – c. 135 CE)

Akiva ben Joseph, also known as Rabbi Akiva, was a leading Jewish scholar and sage, a tanna of the latter part of the first century and the beginning of the second. Rabbi Akiva was a leading contributor to the Mishnah and to Midrash halakha. He is referred to in Tosafot as Rosh la-Hakhamim. He was executed by the Romans in the aftermath of the Bar Kokhba revolt.

In its primary meaning, the Hebrew word mitzvah refers to a commandment from God to be performed as a religious duty. Jewish law in large part consists of discussion of these commandments. According to religious tradition, there are 613 such commandments.

Semikhah is the traditional Jewish name for rabbinic ordination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Weiss Halivni</span> Israeli-American rabbi (1927–2022)

David Weiss Halivni was a European-born American-Israeli rabbi, scholar in the domain of Jewish sciences, and Professor of Talmud. He served as Reish Metivta of the Union for Traditional Judaism's rabbinical school.

According to Rabbinic Judaism, the Oral Torah or Oral Law are statutes and legal interpretations that were not recorded in the Five Books of Moses, the Written Torah, and which are regarded by Orthodox Jews as prescriptive and given at the same time. This holistic Jewish code of conduct encompasses a wide swathe of rituals, worship practices, God–man and interpersonal relationships, from dietary laws to Sabbath and festival observance to marital relations, agricultural practices, and civil claims and damages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rabbinic Judaism</span> Orthodox form of Judaism since the 6th century CE

Rabbinic Judaism, also called Rabbinism, Rabbinicism, or Rabbanite Judaism, has been an orthodox form of Judaism since the 6th century CE, after the codification of the Babylonian Talmud. Rabbinic Judaism has its roots in the Pharisaic school of Second Temple Judaism and is based on the belief that Moses at Mount Sinai received both the Written Torah and the Oral Torah from God. The Oral Torah, transmitted orally, explains the Written Torah. At first, it was forbidden to write down the Oral Torah, but after the destruction of the Second Temple, it was decided to write it down in the form of the Talmud and other rabbinic texts for the sake of preservation.

<i>Tzitzit</i> Knotted threads on the corners of a Tallit Gadol or Tallit Katan in Judaism

Tzitzit are specially knotted ritual fringes, or tassels, worn in antiquity by Israelites and today by observant Jews and Samaritans. Tzitzit are usually attached to the four corners of the tallit gadol, usually referred to simply as a tallit or tallis; and tallit katan. Through synecdoche, a tallit katan may be referred to as tzitzit.

Pardes is a Kabbalistic theory of Biblical exegesis first advanced by Moses de León, adapting the popular "fourfold" method of medieval Christianity. The term, sometimes also rendered PaRDeS, means "orchard" when taken literally, but is used in this context as a Hebrew acronym formed from the initials of the following four approaches:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Noahidism</span> Jewish new religious movement

Noahidism or Noachidism is a monotheistic Jewish religious movement aimed at non-Jews, based upon the Seven Laws of Noah and their traditional interpretations within Orthodox Judaism.

Pardes is the subject of a Jewish aggadah ("legend") about four rabbis of the Mishnaic period who visited the pardes, only one of whom succeeded in leaving the pardes unharmed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alphabet of Rabbi Akiva</span> Midrash on the names of the letters of the Hebrew alphabet

Alphabet of Rabbi Akiva, otherwise known as Letters of Rabbi Akiva or simply Alphabet or Letters, is a midrash on the names of the letters of the Hebrew alphabet. Two versions or portions of this midrash are known to exist.

Yeridat ha-dorot, meaning literally "the decline of the generations", or nitkatnu ha-dorot, meaning "the diminution of the generations", is a concept in classical Rabbinic Judaism and contemporary Orthodox Judaism expressing a belief in the intellectual inferiority of subsequent, and contemporary Torah scholarship and spirituality in comparison to that of the past. It is held to apply to the transmission of the "Revealed" aspects of Torah study, embodied in the legal and homiletic Talmud, and other mainstream rabbinic literature scholarship. Its reasoning derives from the weaker claim to authoritative traditional interpretation of scripture, in later stages of a lengthening historical chain of transmission from the original revelation of the Torah at Mount Sinai, and the codification of the Oral Torah in the Talmud. This idea provides the basis to the designated Rabbinic Eras from the Tannaim and Amoraim of the Talmud, to the subsequent Gaonim, Rishonim and Acharonim. Additionally, it has an extra metaphysical explanation in Kabbalah, regarding lower levels of souls in succeeding generations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tag (Hebrew writing)</span>

A tag is a decoration drawn over some Hebrew letters in the Jewish scrolls of Sifrei Kodesh, Tefillin and Mezuzot. The Hebrew name for this scribal feature is kether (כתר). Tag and kether mean 'crown' in Aramaic and Hebrew respectively.

Tractate Menachot is the second tractate of the Order of Kodashim. It has Gemara in the Babylonian Talmud and a Tosefta.

Quintus Tineius Rufus, also known as Turnus Rufus the Evil in Jewish sources was a senator and provincial governor under the Roman Empire. He is known for his role in unsuccessfully combating the early uprising phase of the Jews under Simon bar Kokhba and Elasar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law given to Moses at Sinai</span> Halakhic law with no biblical reference or source

A law given to Moses at Sinai refers to a halakhic law for which there is no biblical reference or source, but rather was passed down orally as a teaching originating from Moses at Sinai. Such teachings have not been derived from any Talmudical hermeneutics, but known solely from the Jewish tradition.

References

  1. ↑ "Menachot 29b:3". www.sefaria.org. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Jeffrey Rubenstein, Stories of the Babylonian Talmud (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010), 182–20
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Yadin-Israel, Azzan (2014-05-14). "Bavli Menaḥot 29b and the Diminution". Journal of Ancient Judaism. 5 (1): 88–105. doi:10.30965/21967954-00501006. ISSN   1869-3296.
  4. 1 2 PD-icon.svg One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain :  Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "AKIBA BEN JOSEPH". The Jewish Encyclopedia . New York: Funk & Wagnalls. Retrieved 23 January 2017.Jewish Encyclopedia bibliography:
  5. ↑ "Menachot 29b:3". www.sefaria.org. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  6. ↑ Rubenstein, Jeffrey (2002). "Theodicy and Torah (Bavli Menahot 29b)". Rabbinic Stories. The classics of Western spirituality. New York, NY: Paulist Press. pp. 215–217. ISBN   978-0-8091-4024-4.
  7. ↑ Levine, Nachman (2002). "Reading Crowned Letters and Semiotic Silences in Menachot 29b". Journal of Jewish Studies. 53 (1): 35–48. doi:10.18647/2389/JJS-2002. ISSN   0022-2097.
  8. ↑ David Weiss Halivni, “On Man’s Role in Revelation,” in Jacob Neusner, Ernest S. Frerichs, and Nahum M. Sarna, eds., From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism: Essays in Honor of Marvin Fox, vol. 2 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989), 29-49
  9. ↑ Kromhout, David, and Irene E. Zwiep. "Authority, Truth, and the Text of the Early Modern Jewish Bible." Scriptural Authority and Biblical Criticism in the Dutch Golden Age: God's Word Questioned (2017): 133.
  10. ↑ Niehoff, Maren (2012-03-06). Homer and the Bible in the Eyes of Ancient Interpreters. Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004226111_015. ISBN   978-90-04-22134-5.
  11. ↑ Berger, Alan L. (1990). "BEARING WITNESS: SECOND GENERATION LITERATURE OF THE SHOAH". Modern Judaism. 10 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1093/mj/10.1.43. ISSN   0276-1114.
  12. ↑ Michal Bar-Asher Siegal, “Moses in the Apophthegmata Patrum and in Rabbinic Literature,” in Michael Sommer et al, eds., Mosebilder: Gedanken zur Rezeption einer liter- arischen Figur im Frühjudentum, frühen Christentum und der römisch-hellenistischen Literatur (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017) 403–414, as cited in Zellentin (2023)
  13. ↑ Yakir Paz, “‘Binding Crowns to the Letters’ ‒ A Divine Scribal Practice in Its Historical Context,” Tarbiz – A Quarterly for Jewish Studies 86 (January-June 2019): 233–267 [Hebrew]. Cited in Zellentin (2023)
  14. 1 2 Zellentin, Holger (2023). Aras, Martina; Rizk, Charbel; Stosch, Klaus von (eds.). “Honour with Silence the Words of Your Creator” -- Moses’ Silence in bMenaḥot 29b in Light of its Jewish and Christian Context. Beiträge zur komparativen Theologie. Paderborn: Brill | Schöningh. ISBN   978-3-657-79339-6.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  15. ↑ Millerman, Michael (2008-01-01). "The Day the Blackberries Died". MeirSoloveichik.com. Retrieved 2024-11-18.
  16. ↑ Buchdahl, Angela. "Crowns of Torah: Re-Forming Judaism". www.centralsynagogue.org. Retrieved 2024-11-18.
  17. ↑ Rothschild, Sylvia (2015-09-17). "Sermon for Rosh Hashanah at the Pinkas Synagogue in Prague". rabbisylviarothschild. Retrieved 2024-11-18.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.