WikiMili The Free Encyclopedia

In geometry, **Napoleon's theorem** states that if equilateral triangles are constructed on the sides of any triangle, either all outward or all inward, the lines connecting the centres of those equilateral triangles themselves form an equilateral triangle.

**Geometry** is a branch of mathematics concerned with questions of shape, size, relative position of figures, and the properties of space. A mathematician who works in the field of geometry is called a geometer.

In geometry, an **equilateral triangle** is a triangle in which all three sides are equal. In the familiar Euclidean geometry, an equilateral triangle is also equiangular; that is, all three internal angles are also congruent to each other and are each 60°. It is also a regular polygon, so it is also referred to as a **regular triangle**.

A **triangle** is a polygon with three edges and three vertices. It is one of the basic shapes in geometry. A triangle with vertices *A*, *B*, and *C* is denoted .

- Proofs
- Background
- Dublin Problems, October, 1820
- Common center
- Areas and sides of inner and outer Napoleon triangles
- Generalisations
- Petr–Douglas–Neumann theorem
- Napoleon-Barlotti theorem
- See also
- Notes
- References
- External links

The triangle thus formed is called the inner or outer *Napoleon triangle*. The difference in area of these two triangles equals the area of the original triangle.

The theorem is often attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821). Some have suggested that it may date back to W. Rutherford's 1825 question published in * The Ladies' Diary *, four years after the French emperor's death,^{ [1] }^{ [2] } but the result is covered in three questions set in an examination for a Gold Medal at the University of Dublin in October, 1820, whereas Napoleon died the following May.

**Napoléon Bonaparte** was a French statesman and military leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led several successful campaigns during the French Revolutionary Wars. He was Emperor of the French as Napoleon I from 1804 until 1814 and again briefly in 1815 during the Hundred Days. Napoleon dominated European and global affairs for more than a decade while leading France against a series of coalitions in the Napoleonic Wars. He won most of these wars and the vast majority of his battles, building a large empire that ruled over much of continental Europe before its final collapse in 1815. He is considered one of the greatest commanders in history, and his wars and campaigns are studied at military schools worldwide. Napoleon's political and cultural legacy has endured as one of the most celebrated and controversial leaders in human history.

**William Rutherford** (1798–1871) was an English mathematician famous for his calculation of 208 digits of the mathematical constant π in 1841.

* The Ladies' Diary: or, Woman's Almanack* appeared annually in London from 1704 to 1841 after which it was succeeded by

In the figure above, ABC is the original triangle. AZB, BXC, and CYA are equilateral triangles constructed on its sides' exteriors, and points L, M, and N are the centroids of those triangles. The theorem for outer triangles states that triangle LMN *(green)* is equilateral.

A quick way to see that the triangle LMN is equilateral is to observe that MN becomes CZ under a clockwise rotation of 30° around A and a homothety of ratio √3 with the same center, and that LN also becomes CZ after a counterclockwise rotation of 30° around B and a homothety of ratio √3 with the same center. The respective spiral similarities ^{ [3] } are A(√3,-30°) and B(√3,30°). That implies MN = LN and the angle between them must be 60°.^{ [4] }

Two-dimensional rotation can occur in two possible directions. A **clockwise** motion is one that proceeds in the same direction as a clock's hands: from the top to the right, then down and then to the left, and back up to the top. The opposite sense of rotation or revolution is **counterclockwise** (**CCW**) or **anticlockwise** (**ACW**).

In mathematics, a **homothety** is a transformation of an affine space determined by a point *S* called its *center* and a nonzero number *λ* called its *ratio*, which sends

Two geometrical objects are called **similar** if they both have the same shape, or one has the same shape as the mirror image of the other. More precisely, one can be obtained from the other by uniformly scaling, possibly with additional translation, rotation and reflection. This means that either object can be rescaled, repositioned, and reflected, so as to coincide precisely with the other object. If two objects are similar, each is congruent to the result of a particular uniform scaling of the other. A modern and novel perspective of similarity is to consider geometrical objects similar if one appears congruent to the other when zoomed in or out at some level.

There are in fact many proofs of the theorem's statement, including a trigonometric one,^{ [5] } a symmetry-based approach,^{ [6] } and proofs using complex numbers.^{ [5] }

**Trigonometry** is a branch of mathematics that studies relationships between side lengths and angles of triangles. The field emerged in the Hellenistic world during the 3rd century BC from applications of geometry to astronomical studies. In particular, 3rd-century astronomers first noted that the ratio of the lengths of two sides of a right-angled triangle depends only of one acute angles of the triangle. These dependencies are now called trigonometric functions.

**Symmetry** in everyday language refers to a sense of harmonious and beautiful proportion and balance. In mathematics, "symmetry" has a more precise definition, that an object is invariant to any of various transformations; including reflection, rotation or scaling. Although these two meanings of "symmetry" can sometimes be told apart, they are related, so in this article they are discussed together.

A **complex number** is a number that can be expressed in the form *a* + *bi*, where *a* and *b* are real numbers, and *i* is a solution of the equation *x*^{2} = −1. Because no real number satisfies this equation, *i* is called an imaginary number. For the complex number *a* + *bi*, *a* is called the **real part**, and *b* is called the **imaginary part**. Despite the historical nomenclature "imaginary", complex numbers are regarded in the mathematical sciences as just as "real" as the real numbers, and are fundamental in many aspects of the scientific description of the natural world.

The theorem has frequently been attributed to Napoleon, but several papers have been written concerning this issue^{ [7] }^{ [8] } which cast doubt upon this assertion (see ( Grünbaum 2012 )).

The following entry appeared on page 47 in the Ladies' Diary of 1825 (so in late 1824, a year or so after the compilation of Dublin examination papers). This is an early appearance of Napoleon's theorem in print, and it is to be noted that Napoleon's name is not mentioned.

- VII. Quest.(1439);
*by Mr. W. Rutherford, Woodburn.*

- "Describe equilateral triangles (the vertices being either all outward or all inward) upon the three sides of any triangle ABC: then the lines which join the centres of gravity of those three equilateral triangles will constitute an equilateral triangle. Required a demonstration."

Since William Rutherford was a very capable mathematician, his motive for requesting a proof of a theorem that he could certainly have proved himself is unknown. Maybe he posed the question as a challenge to his peers, or perhaps he hoped that the responses would yield a more elegant solution. However, it is clear from reading successive issues of the *Ladies Diary* in the 1820s, that the Editor aimed to include a varied set of questions each year, with some suited for the exercise of beginners.

Plainly there is no reference to Napoleon in either the question or the published responses, which appeared a year later in 1826, though the Editor evidently omitted some submissions. Also Rutherford himself does not appear amongst the named solvers after the printed solutions, although from the tally a few pages earlier it is evident that he did send in a solution, as did several of his pupils and associates at Woodburn School, including the first of the published solutions. Indeed, the Woodburn Problem Solving Group, as it might be known today, was sufficiently well known by then to be written up in *A Historical, Geographical, and Descriptive View of the County of Northumberland ...* (2nd ed. Vo. II, pp. 123–124). It had been thought that the first known reference to this result as Napoleon's theorem appears in Faifofer's 17th Edition of *Elementi di Geometria* published in 1911,^{ [9] } although Faifofer does actually mention Napoleon in somewhat earlier editions. But this is moot, because we find Napoleon mentioned by name in this context in an encyclopaedia by 1867. What is of greater historical interest as regards Faifofer is the problem he had been using in earlier editions: a classic problem on circumscribing the greatest equilateral triangle about a given triangle that Thomas Moss had posed in the *Ladies Diary* in 1754, in the solution to which by William Bevil the following year we might easily recognize the germ of Napoleon's Theorem - the two results then run together, back and forth for at least the next hundred years in the problem pages of the popular almanacs: when Honsberger proposed in *Mathematical Gems* in 1973 what he thought was a novelty of his own, he was actually recapitulating part of this vast, if informal, literature.

It might be as well to recall that a popular variant of the Pythagorean proposition, where squares are placed on the edges of triangles, was to place equilateral triangles on the edges of triangles: could you do with equilateral triangles what you could do with squares - for example, in the case of right triangles, dissect the one on the hypotenuse into those on the legs? Just as authors returned repeatedly to consider other properties of Euclid's Windmill or Bride's Chair, so the equivalent figure with equilateral triangles replacing squares invited - and received - attention. Perhaps the most majestic effort in this regard is William Mason's Prize Question in the *Lady's and Gentleman's Diary* for 1864, the solutions and commentary for which the following year run to some fifteen pages. By then, this particular venerable venue - starting in 1704 for the *Ladies' Diary* and in 1741 for the *Gentleman's Diary* - was on its last legs, but problems of this sort continued in the *Educational Times* right into the early 1900s.

In the Geometry paper, set on the second morning of the papers for candidates for the Gold Medal in the General Examination of the University of Dublin in October 1820, the following three problems appear.

*Question 10. Three equilateral triangles are thus constructed on the sides of a given triangle, A, B, D, the lines joining their centres, C, C', C" form an equilateral triangle.*[The accompanying diagram shows the equilateral triangles placed outwardly.]

*Question 11. If the three equilateral triangles be constructed as in the last figure, the lines joining their centres will also form an equilateral triangle.*[The accompanying diagram shows the equilateral triangles places inwardly.]

*Question 12. To investigate the relation between the area of the given triangle and the areas of these two equilateral triangles.*

These problems are recorded in

*Dublin problems: a collection of questions proposed to the candidates for the gold medal at the general examinations, from 1816 to 1822 inclusive. Which is succeeded by an account of the fellowship examination, in 1823*(G. and W. B. Whittaker, London, 1823)^{ [10] }

Question 1249 in the * Gentleman's Diary; or Mathematical Repository * for 1829 (so appearing in late 1828) takes up the theme, with solutions appearing in the issue for the following year. One of the solvers, T. S. Davies then generalized the result in Question 1265 that year, presenting his own solution the following year, drawing on a paper he had already contributed to the * Philosophical Magazine * in 1826. There are no cross-references in this material to that described above. However, there are several items of cognate interest in the problem pages of the popular almanacs both going back to at least the mid-1750s (Moss) and continuing on to the mid-1860s (Mason), as alluded to above.

As it happens, Napoleon's name is mentioned in connection with this result in no less a work of reference than *Chambers's Encyclopedia* as early as 1867 (Vol. IX, towards the close of the entry on triangles).

*Another remarkable property of triangles, known as Napoleon's problem is as follows: if on any triangle three equilateral triangles be described, and the centres of gravity of these three be joined, the triangle thus formed is equilateral, and has its centre of gravity coincident with that of the original triangle.*

But then the result had appeared, with proof, in a textbook by at least 1834 (James Thomson's *Euclid*, pp. 255–256 ^{ [11] }). In an endnote (p. 372), Thomason adds

*This curious proposition I have not met with, except in the*Dublin Problems,*published in 1823, where it is inserted without demonstration.*

In the second edition (1837), Thomson extended the endnote by providing a proof from a former student in Belfast:

*The following is an outline of a very easy and neat proof it by Mr. Adam D. Glasgow of Belfast, a former student of mine of great taste and talent for mathematical pursuits:*

Thus, Thomson does not appear aware of the appearance of the problem in the *Ladies' Diary* for 1825 or the *Gentleman's Diary* for 1829 (just as J. S. Mackay was to remain unaware of the latter appearance, with its citation of *Dublin Problems,* while noting the former; readers of the *American Mathematical Monthly* have a pointer to Question 1249 in the *Gentleman's Diary* from R. C. Archibald in the issue for January, 1920, p. 41, fn. 7, although the first published solution in the *Ladies Diary* for 1826 shows that even Archibald was not omniscient in matters of priority).

The centers of both the inner and outer Napoleon triangles coincide with the centroid of the original triangle. This coincidence was noted in Chambers's Encyclopaedia in 1867, as quoted above. The entry there is unsigned. P. G. Tait, then Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh, is listed amongst the contributors, but J. U. Hillhouse, Mathematical Tutor also at the University of Edinburgh, appears amongst *other literary gentlemen connected for longer or shorter times with the regular staff of the Encyclopaedia.* However, in Section 189(e) of *An Elementary Treatise on Quaternions*,^{ [12] } also in 1867, Tait treats the problem (in effect, echoing Davies' remarks in the Gentleman's Diary in 1831 with regard to Question 1265, but now in the setting of quaternions):

*If perpendiculars be erected outwards at the middle points of the sides of a triangle, each being proportional to the corresponding side, the mean point of their extremities coincides with that of the original triangle. Find the ratio of each perpendicular to half the corresponding side of the old triangle that the new triangle may be equilateral.*

Tait concludes that the mean points of equilateral triangles erected outwardly on the sides of any triangle form an equilateral triangle. The discussion is retained in subsequent editions in 1873 and 1890, as well as in his further *Introduction to Quaternions*^{ [13] } jointly with Philip Kelland in 1873.

The area of the inner Napoleon triangle of a triangle with area is

where *a*, *b*, and *c* are the side lengths of the original triangle, with equality only in the case in which the original triangle is equilateral, by Weitzenböck's inequality. However, from an algebraic standpoint^{ [14] } the inner triangle is "retrograde" and its *algebraic* area is the negative of this expression.^{ [15] }

The area of the outer Napoleon triangle is^{ [16] }

Analytically, it can be shown^{ [5] } that each of the three sides of the outer Napoleon triangle has a length of

The relation between the latter two equations is that the area of an equilateral triangle equals the square of the side times

*If isosceles triangles with apex angles 2kπ/n are erected on the sides of an arbitrary n-gon A*._{0}, and if this process is repeated with the n-gon formed by the free apices of the triangles, but with a different value of k, and so on until all values 1 ≤ k ≤ n − 2 have been used (in arbitrary order), then a regular n-gon A_{n−2}is formed whose centroid coincides with the centroid of A_{0}^{ [17] }^{ [18] }

The centers of regular n-gons constructed over the sides of an n-gon P form a regular n-gon if and only if P is an affine image of a regular n-gon.^{ [19] }^{ [20] }

- ↑ Grünbaum 2012
- ↑ "Napoleon's Theorem - from Wolfram MathWorld". Mathworld.wolfram.com. 2013-08-29. Retrieved 2013-09-06.
- ↑ Weisstein, Eric W. "Spiral Similarity".
*MathWorld*. - ↑ For a visual demonstration see
*Napoleon's Theorem via Two Rotations*at Cut-the-Knot. - 1 2 3 "Napoleon's Theorem".
*MathPages.com*. - ↑ Alexander Bogomolny. "Proof #2 (an argument by symmetrization)". Cut-the-knot.org. Retrieved 2013-09-06.
- ↑ Cavallaro, V.G. (1949), "Per la storia dei teoremi attribuiti a Napoleone Buonaparte e a Frank Morley",
*Archimede*,**1**: 286–287 - ↑ Scriba, Christoph J (1981). "Wie kommt 'Napoleons Satz' zu seinem namen?".
*Historia Mathematica*.**8**(4): 458–459. doi:10.1016/0315-0860(81)90054-9. - ↑ Faifofer (1911),
*Elementi di Geometria*(17th ed.), Venezia, p. 186, but the historical record cites various editions in different years. This reference is from ( Wetzel 1992 ) - ↑ http://solo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/dlDisplay.do?vid=OXVU1&docId=oxfaleph014134656 http://dbooks.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/books/PDFs/590315941.pdf [22.8MB]
- ↑ The First Six and the Eleventh and Twelfth Books of Euclid's Elements; with Notes and Illustrations, and an Appendix in Five Books (Adam and Charles B;ack, Edinburgh; Longman, Rees & co, London; John Cumming, Dublin; Simms & McIntyre, Belfast; James Brash & Co, Glasgow, 1834) https://books.google.com/books?id=dQBfAAAAcAAJ
- ↑ Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1867, pp. 133--135
- ↑ Macmillan, London, 1873, pp. 42--43
- ↑ Weisstein, Eric W. "Inner Napoleon Triangle." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InnerNapoleonTriangle.html
- ↑ Coxeter, H.S.M., and Greitzer, Samuel L. 1967.
*Geometry Revisited*, page 64. - ↑ Weisstein, Eric W. "Outer Napoleon Triangle." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/OuterNapoleonTriangle.html
- ↑ B. Gr ¨ unbaum, Metamorphoses of polygons, in The Lighter Side of Mathematics, Proc. Eug` ene Strens Memorial Conference, Edited by R. K. Guy and R. E. Woodrow, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1994. 35–48.
- ↑ "Isogonal Prismatoids".
*Discrete & Computational Geometry*.**18**: 13–52. doi:10.1007/PL00009307. - ↑ A. Barlotti, Intorno ad una generalizzazione di un noto teorema relativo al triangolo, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 7 no. 3 (1952) 182–185.
- ↑ Una proprietà degli n-agoni che si ottengono transformando in una affinità un n-agono regolare, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 10 no. 3 (1955) 96–98.

**Area** is the quantity that expresses the extent of a two-dimensional figure or shape, or planar lamina, in the plane. Surface area is its analog on the two-dimensional surface of a three-dimensional object. Area can be understood as the amount of material with a given thickness that would be necessary to fashion a model of the shape, or the amount of paint necessary to cover the surface with a single coat. It is the two-dimensional analog of the length of a curve or the volume of a solid.

In Euclidean plane geometry, a **quadrilateral** is a polygon with four edges and four vertices or corners. Sometimes, the term **quadrangle** is used, by analogy with triangle, and sometimes **tetragon** for consistency with pentagon (5-sided), hexagon (6-sided) and so on.

In geometry, a **hexagon** is a six-sided polygon or 6-gon. The total of the internal angles of any simple (non-self-intersecting) hexagon is 720°.

In geometry, **bisection** is the division of something into two equal or congruent parts, usually by a line, which is then called a *bisector*. The most often considered types of bisectors are the *segment bisector* and the *angle bisector*.

In geometry, an **altitude** of a triangle is a line segment through a vertex and perpendicular to a line containing the base. This line containing the opposite side is called the *extended base* of the altitude. The intersection of the extended base and the altitude is called the *foot* of the altitude. The length of the altitude, often simply called "the altitude", is the distance between the extended base and the vertex. The process of drawing the altitude from the vertex to the foot is known as *dropping the altitude* at that vertex. It is a special case of orthogonal projection.

In geometry, a **median** of a triangle is a line segment joining a vertex to the midpoint of the opposite side, thus bisecting that side. Every triangle has exactly three medians, one from each vertex, and they all intersect each other at the triangle's centroid. In the case of isosceles and equilateral triangles, a median bisects any angle at a vertex whose two adjacent sides are equal in length.

In plane geometry, **Morley's trisector theorem** states that in any triangle, the three points of intersection of the adjacent angle trisectors form an equilateral triangle, called the **first Morley triangle** or simply the **Morley triangle**. The theorem was discovered in 1899 by Anglo-American mathematician Frank Morley. It has various generalizations; in particular, if all of the trisectors are intersected, one obtains four other equilateral triangles.

In geometry, the **circumscribed circle** or **circumcircle** of a polygon is a circle that passes through all the vertices of the polygon. The center of this circle is called the **circumcenter** and its radius is called the **circumradius**.

In geometry, the **Fermat point** of a triangle, also called the **Torricelli point** or **Fermat–Torricelli point**, is a point such that the total distance from the three vertices of the triangle to the point is the minimum possible. It is so named because this problem is first raised by Fermat in a private letter to Evangelista Torricelli, who solved it.

**Viviani's theorem**, named after Vincenzo Viviani, states that the sum of the distances from *any* interior point to the sides of an equilateral triangle equals the length of the triangle's altitude.

In mathematics, **Weitzenböck's inequality**, named after Roland Weitzenböck, states that for a triangle of side lengths , , , and area , the following inequality holds:

In mathematics, the **Hadwiger–Finsler inequality** is a result on the geometry of triangles in the Euclidean plane. It states that if a triangle in the plane has side lengths *a*, *b* and *c* and area *T*, then

In geometry, a **bicentric polygon** is a tangential polygon which is also cyclic — that is, inscribed in an outer circle that passes through each vertex of the polygon. All triangles and all regular polygons are bicentric. On the other hand, a rectangle with unequal sides is not bicentric, because no circle can be tangent to all four sides.

**Varignon's theorem** is a statement in Euclidean geometry, that deals with the construction of a particular parallelogram, the **Varignon parallelogram**, from an arbitrary quadrilateral (quadrangle). It is named after Pierre Varignon, who published it in 1731.

In mathematics, **Marden's theorem**, named after Morris Marden but proved much earlier by Jörg Siebeck, gives a geometric relationship between the zeroes of a third-degree polynomial with complex coefficients and the zeroes of its derivative. See also Geometry of roots of real polynomials.

In geometry, the **Steiner inellipse**, **midpoint inellipse**, or **midpoint ellipse** of a triangle is the unique ellipse inscribed in the triangle and tangent to the sides at their midpoints. It is an example of an inellipse. By comparison the inscribed circle and Mandart inellipse of a triangle are other inconics that are tangent to the sides, but not at the midpoints unless the triangle is equilateral. The Steiner inellipse is attributed by Dörrie to Jakob Steiner, and a proof of its uniqueness is given by Kalman.

In geometry, **Napoleon points** are a pair of special points associated with a plane triangle. It is generally believed that the existence of these points was discovered by Napoleon Bonaparte, the Emperor of the French from 1804 to 1815, but many have questioned this belief. The Napoleon points are triangle centers and they are listed as the points X(17) and X(18) in Clark Kimberling's Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers.

In geometry, the **Petr–Douglas–Neumann theorem** is a result concerning arbitrary planar polygons. The theorem asserts that a certain procedure when applied to an arbitrary polygon always yields a regular polygon having the same number of sides as the initial polygon. The theorem was first published by Karel Petr (1868–1950) of Prague in 1908. The theorem was independently rediscovered by Jesse Douglas (1897–1965) in 1940 and also by B H Neumann (1909–2002) in 1941. The naming of the theorem as *Petr–Douglas–Neumann theorem*, or as the *PDN-theorem* for short, is due to Stephen B Gray. This theorem has also been called **Douglas’s theorem**, the **Douglas–Neumann theorem**, the **Napoleon–Douglas–Neumann theorem** and **Petr’s theorem**.

In mathematics, **Lemoine's problem** is a certain construction problem in elementary plane geometry posed by the French mathematician Émile Lemoine (1840–1912) in 1868. The problem was published as Question 864 in *Nouvelles Annales de Mathématiques*. The chief interest in the problem is that a discussion of the solution of the problem by Ludwig Kiepert published in *Nouvelles Annales de Mathématiques* contained a description of a hyperbola which is now known as the Kiepert hyperbola.

- Coxeter, H.S.M.; Greitzer, S.L. (1967).
*Geometry Revisited*. New Mathematical Library.**19**. Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America. pp. 60–65. ISBN 978-0-88385-619-2. Zbl 0166.16402. - Grünbaum, Branko (2012), "Is Napoleon's Theorem
*Really*Napoleon's Theorem?",*American Mathematical Monthly*,**119**(6): 495–501, doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.119.06.495, Zbl 1264.01010 - Wetzel, John E. (April 1992). "Converses of Napoleon's Theorem" (PDF).
*The American Mathematical Monthly*.**99**(4): 339–351. doi:10.2307/2324901. Zbl 1264.01010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-29.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to . Napoleon's theorem |

- Napoleon's Theorem and Generalizations, at Cut-the-Knot
- To see the construction, at instrumenpoche
- Napoleon's Theorem by Jay Warendorff, The Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
- Weisstein, Eric W. "Napoleon's Theorem".
*MathWorld*. - Napoleon's Theorem and some generalizations, variations & converses at Dynamic Geometry Sketches
- Napoleon's Theorem, Two Simple Proofs
- Infinite Regular Hexagon Sequences on a Triangle (generalization of Napoleon's Theorem) by Alvy Ray Smith.

*This article incorporates material from Napoleon's theorem on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.*

This page is based on this Wikipedia article

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.

Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.