News Media Bargaining Code

Last updated

Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Act 2021
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Parliament of Australia
  • A Bill for an Act to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 in relation to digital platforms, and for related purposes
Citation Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Act 2021 (Cth)
Territorial extent Australia
Passed by Australian House of Representatives
Passed17 February 2021
Enacted25 February 2021 (with amendments from the Senate)
Passed by Australian Senate
Passed24 February 2021
Royal assent 2 March 2021
Commenced3 March 2021
Legislative history
First chamber: Australian House of Representatives
Bill titleTreasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Bill 2020
Bill citation Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Bill 2020 (Cth)
Introduced by Josh Frydenberg
First reading 9 December 2020
Second reading 17 February 2021
Third reading 17 February 2021
Second chamber: Australian Senate
Bill titleTreasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Bill 2021
Member(s) in charge Zed Seselja
First reading22 February 2021
Second reading23 February 2021
Third reading24 February 2021
Amends
Competition and Consumer Act 2010
Summary
"Establish a mandatory code of conduct that applies to news media businesses and digital platform corporations when bargaining in relation to news content made available by digital platform services."
Status: Current legislation

The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC, or News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) [1] is a law designed to have large technology platforms that operate in Australia pay local news publishers for the news content made available or linked on their platforms. The law's definition of news is broad, [2] including "content that reports, investigates or explains ... current issues or events of public significance for Australians at a local, regional or national level." [1] :3 Originating in April 2020, when the Australian Government asked the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) to begin drafting it, it achieved broad support in the Australian Parliament but staunch opposition from Facebook and Google. [3] [4]

Contents

Under the law, there are two ways for the eligible news organisations (the ones registered with the Australian Communications and Media Authority (the ACMA) to extract fees from the platforms: [5]

As of November 2024, no platforms were designated and no designations were pending. [5]

Purpose

The Act seeks to "address a bargaining power imbalance that exists between digital platforms and Australian news businesses" which the ACCC identified in its Digital Platforms Inquiry report. [6] The Australian government hopes it "will ensure that news media businesses are fairly remunerated for the content they generate, helping to sustain public interest journalism in Australia". [7]

It requires stakeholders to agree to a dollar value of the news content distributed by the platforms, pay that revenue to registered news publishers, and agree to final offer arbitration in the case of a dispute between a publisher and a platform on the value of the news content. [1] The Bill defined making "content available" by "if the content is reproduced on the service, or is otherwise placed on the service, or if a link to the content or an extract of the content is provided on the service." [1] Nine Network estimated this amount to be $432 million. [8] The code would also require digital platforms give 28 days notice to Australian news publishers about algorithm changes that could affect links to their news content. [9]

Proponents of the law argue that the profitability of social media companies is partly attributable to the fact that users can receive news updates even when they do not view the ads on the page of the original publisher.

Reception

The code was supported by media companies based outside Australia The Guardian , the Daily Mail , [10] and News Corp. The bill was also supported by the Australian Press Council.[ citation needed ] The Bill also saw support from public broadcasters, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the Special Broadcasting Service, following their amended inclusion in the remuneration stages of the code. [11] [12] The bill also saw support from Microsoft, which issued a statement suggesting that the code would be made to work with its search engine Bing. [13] This followed a comment from Google Australia which said the company would pull out of the Australian market if the code was enacted. [14]

Smaller journalistic entities including The New Daily , Crikey and Country Press Australia argued that the code favours dominant media companies at the expense of smaller publishers.[ citation needed ]

The policy director of the Australian Taxpayers' Alliance called the measure protectionism. [3] Other notable technologists including World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, [15] journalism professor Jeff Jarvis, [16] New York Times technology journalist Kara Swisher [17] and Stratechery writer Ben Thompson [18] criticised the code for being technically unworkable. Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who is a prominent activist against News Corp, [19] argued that the code was designed to favour the company's properties. [20] Crikey political editor Bernard Keane criticised Australian mainstream media for allegedly "systematically misleading [their] audiences" over the code and the legislation. [21]

While originally unified in their rejection of NMBC and issuance of threats to remove Australian News from their platforms, [22] Google and Meta ended up with different approaches to the problem. [23] This reflects difference in their positioning with respect to the news: Meta's interest in dissemination of the news had diminished since the late 2010s to the point where the news tabs in Facebook were removed for some countries, while Google has kept interest in the Google News. [24]

Google

Google was funding the news sector through its Google News Initiative to the tune of approximately 600 million dollars since 2018, with 1 billion allocated for Google News Showcase, to be paid to selected new outlets. While these payment numbers are global, some monetary contributions were made to Australian news providers before NMBC. Google, however, mostly relied on in-kind support, like free GSuite licenses and training via the Google News Academy. [25]

Google originally criticised the idea of NMBC as unfeasible, especially the restrictions on when they can change the algorithms for how various sources are ranked. [3]

Due to the confidentiality of the agreements, it is hard to estimate the post-NMBC amounts, although rumors have it that Google is paying more than Meta, provides discounts on its technology and additional revenue-sharing income streams. [26] Google moved fast, signing more deals for a higher total amount than Meta, but tried to structure the contracts to encourage the production of content for the News Showcase, prioritising the podcasts. For the smaller media outlets, Google was able to dictate what kind of content is expected, even though the NMBC was not intended as a means for the platforms paying for content specifically generated for them. This appears to be a result of Google trying to use the (voluntary) "significant contribution" clauses of NMBC in order to avoid the "mandatory designation" option. [27]

Meta

Meta's approach pre-NMBC was mostly of a philanthropic nature, with millions of dollars flowing to regional news providers and public interest news. In-kind support was also provided, for example, through engagement with the Walkley Foundation (Google also was involved). [28]

Since the percentage of the news content on Canadian Facebook is quite low (less than 1% of posts contain URL of Australian news sites), late in 2024, as Meta was avoiding entering new contracts with Australian media, Bruns et al. predicted that Meta that would enact a permanent ban on Australian news following the approach it took in Canada (in August of 2023, after the Canada's Online News Act) to avoid getting entangled with NMBC. [29] The concern about Meta withdrawing its news coverage contributed to the absence of any designations as of November 2024. [5]

History

In December 2017, the Turnbull government directed the ACCC to conduct an inquiry into "competition in media and advertising services markets", focusing in large part on Google and Facebook. The final report published in July 2019 made several conclusions regarding the state of competition in the news and media landscape: [30]

[We're seeing] reduced production of particular types of news and journalism, including local government and local court reporting, which are important for the healthy functioning of the democratic process. There is not yet any indication of a business model that can effectively replace the advertiser model, which has historically funded the production of these types of journalism in Australia.

In April 2020, the Morrison government directed the ACCC to develop a mandatory code "to address bargaining power imbalances between digital platforms and media companies". The draft News Media Bargaining Code was published by the ACCC in July 2020, and interested parties were invited to make submissions regarding the proposed code. [4]

In August 2020, Google users in Australia were directed to an open letter protesting the law, which the ACCC characterised as misleading. The letter stated that Google already complies with existing reimbursement programs that are less broad. [8] While in submission phase in Parliament, Google Australia director Mel Silva said the bill was "untenable" and that the company would discontinue access to its search engine within Australia if the code was enacted without changes. [31]

On 28 August 2020, the ACCC closed the consultation period on the proposal. The code was converted to a bill and sent to Parliament in December 2020. [4]

The bill caused digital platforms to negotiate payments to local news publishers. By February 2021, Google established deals in anticipation of the code's enactment and negotiated lump sum deals with Seven West Media, [32] Nine Entertainment, [33] and News Corp [34] to provide content for the company's new "News Showcase" feature. These deals would mean Google can avoid entering the arbitration stages of the code. [35]

Facebook blocks news

In August 2020 Facebook stated that the proposed legislation left them "with a choice of either removing news entirely or accepting a system that lets publishers charge us for as much content as they want at a price with no clear limits". Facebook warned that if the "draft code becomes law, we will reluctantly stop allowing publishers and people in Australia from sharing local and international news on Facebook and Instagram". [36] Following the Senate committee endorsing the legislation without pushing for any amendments, on 17 February 2021 Facebook claimed "the proposed law fundamentally misunderstands the relationship between our platform and publishers who use it to share news content" [37] and blocked all Australian news from being shared by anyone on their platform and blocked all news from being seen or shared by users in Australia. [37] [38] [39] [40] Facebook also blocked pages of some government, community, union, charity, political, and emergency services, which were later reinstated. [41] [42] The company said this was a result of the bill having a broad definition of news content. [43] For example, as the main provider of weather forecasts, warnings and observations to the Australian public, the Bureau of Meteorology by definition "reports, investigates or explains ... current issues or events of public significance for Australians at a local, regional or national level",[ citation needed ] and was one of the services initially affected.

In a Facebook post, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison said that "Facebook's actions to unfriend Australia, cutting off essential information services on health and emergency services, were as arrogant as they were disappointing." [44] The move by the company saw widespread condemnation by Australian political leaders, and a mixed reaction from Australian residents and experts. [45] [46] [47] [48] The Australian government strongly criticised the move, saying it demonstrated the "immense market power of these digital social giants". [49] The federal government announced it is stopping all its advertising campaigns on Facebook, worth millions of dollars. [50] Days after Facebook's response to the bill and experts predicting that misinformation on Facebook will spread more rapidly, [51] with a spokesperson for one of the country's biggest media companies saying "Facebook will now be a platform for misinformation to rapidly spread without balance". [52] In late February, technology companies including Facebook and Google released the final version of an industry code to address the spread of misinformation on their services in Australia. [51] [53]

On 22 February, Facebook said it reached an agreement with the Australian government that would see news returning to Australian users in the coming days. [54]

2024 implementation announcement

During the evening of 11 December 2024, several Australian news outlets published articles stating that the Albanese government would announce updates to the issue of social media news bargaining the following day. Speculation stated that large technology companies would be forced to pay news publishers for media made available through their services or incur a fine. [55] [56]

Results

The evaluation of the NMBC implementation is hampered by its "murky" nature, "with critical details guarded like they're nuclear launch codes". Still, by 2023 it was considered a success by the journalism researchers and the Australian government. [57] Media outlets had expanded their newsrooms following the agreement on funding deals. [58]

More than 30 deals have been reached after the first year of operation, [59] with the number of media companies much higher: NMBC allows collective bargaining for the companies with revenues below 10 million Australian dollars; one of the agreements involved 84 smaller companies, another 24. The total value of the deals was 200 million Australian dollars. [58] Notable failures include the inability of the Special Broadcasting Service and The Conversation to reach an agreement with Facebook. The Australian Department of Treasury was considering extending the NMBC to Instagram and TikTok [59] (YouTube is sharing its revenues already [58] ).

In March 2024, Meta stopped renewing the Facebook contracts related to News Media Bargaining Code, resulting in calls for Facebook to be designated under the Act. [60] Axel Bruns expects the Australian government at some point to "designate" Meta, leading to Meta going for a permanent ban on Australian news content on its sites (so it can plausibly argue in court that it no longer is subject to NMBC). In turn, the government might pass the "must-carry" legislation that would force Meta to carry news content. [61]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Google News</span> News aggregator website and app

Google News is a news aggregator service developed by Google. It presents a continuous flow of links to articles organized from thousands of publishers and magazines. Google News is available as an app on Android, iOS, and the Web.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is the chief competition regulator of the Government of Australia, located within the Department of the Treasury. It was established in 1995 with the amalgamation of the Australian Trade Practices Commission and the Prices Surveillance Authority to administer the Trade Practices Act 1974, which was renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 on 1 January 2011. The ACCC's mandate is to protect consumer rights and business rights and obligations, to perform industry regulation and price monitoring, and to prevent illegal anti-competitive behaviour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in Australia</span>

Mass media in Australia spans traditional and digital formats, and caters mostly to its predominantly English-speaking population. It is delivered in a variety of formats including radio, television, paper, internet and IPTV. Varieties include local, regional, state, federal and international sources of media, reporting on Australian news, opinion, policy, issues and culture.

<i>Australian Financial Review</i> Australian financial newspaper

The Australian Financial Review (AFR) is an Australian business-focused, compact daily newspaper covering the current business and economic affairs of Australia and the world. The newspaper is based in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; owned by Nine Entertainment and has been published continuously since its founding in 1951. The AFR is published in tabloid format six times a week, whilst providing 24/7 online coverage through its website. In November 2019, the AFR reached 2.647 million Australians through both print and digital mediums (Mumbrella).

Online advertising, also known as online marketing, Internet advertising, digital advertising or web advertising, is a form of marketing and advertising that uses the Internet to promote products and services to audiences and platform users. Online advertising includes email marketing, search engine marketing (SEM), social media marketing, many types of display advertising, and mobile advertising. Advertisements are increasingly being delivered via automated software systems operating across multiple websites, media services and platforms, known as programmatic advertising.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), formerly Brixton Endeavors, is a British-American not-for-profit NGO company with offices in London and Washington, D.C. with the stated purpose of stopping the spread of online hate speech and disinformation. It campaigns to deplatform people that it believes promote hate or misinformation, and campaigns to restrict media organisations such as The Daily Wire from advertising. CCDH is a member of the Stop Hate For Profit coalition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook</span> Social-networking service owned by Meta Platforms

Facebook is a social media and social networking service owned by American technology conglomerate Meta. Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with four other Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes, its name derives from the face book directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities. Since 2006, Facebook allows everyone to register from 13 years old, except in the case of a handful of nations, where the age limit is 14 years. As of December 2022, Facebook claimed almost 3 billion monthly active users. As of October 2023, Facebook ranked as the third-most-visited website in the world, with 22.56% of its traffic coming from the United States. It was the most downloaded mobile app of the 2010s.

Facebook has been the subject of criticism and legal action since it was founded in 2004. Criticisms include the outsize influence Facebook has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well as Facebook's influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. Notable issues include Internet privacy, such as use of a widespread "like" button on third-party websites tracking users, possible indefinite records of user information, automatic facial recognition software, and its role in the workplace, including employer-employee account disclosure. The use of Facebook can have negative psychological and physiological effects that include feelings of sexual jealousy, stress, lack of attention, and social media addiction that in some cases is comparable to drug addiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seven West Media</span> Australian media company

Seven West Media Limited is an Australian ASX-listed media company and it is Australia's largest diversified media business, with an extensive presence in broadcast television, radio, print and online publishing. It is Home to the Seven Network Station, TVW.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rod Sims</span> Australian economist and former public servant

Rodney Graham Sims is an Australian economist and former public servant. Sims served as chair of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), Australia's competition regulator, from 1 August 2011 to 20 March 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Accelerated Mobile Pages</span> Open source fast loading HTML framework

AMP is an open source HTML framework developed by the AMP Open Source Project. It was originally created by Google as a competitor to Facebook Instant Articles and Apple News. AMP is optimized for mobile web browsing and intended to help webpages load faster. AMP pages may be cached by a CDN, such as Cloudflare's AMP caches, which allows pages to be served more quickly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship by Facebook</span>

Facebook has been involved in multiple controversies involving censorship of content, removing or omitting information from its services in order to comply with company policies, legal demands, and government censorship laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TikTok</span> Video-focused social media platform

TikTok, whose mainland Chinese and Hong Kong counterpart is Douyin, is a short-form video hosting service owned by Chinese internet company ByteDance. It hosts user-submitted videos, which can range in duration from three seconds to 60 minutes. It can be accessed with a smart phone app or the web.

Big Tech, also known as the Tech Giants or Tech Titans, is a grouping of the largest IT companies in the world. The concept of Big Tech is similar to the grouping of dominant companies in other sectors. It typically refers to the Big Five United States tech companies: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft; or the Magnificent Seven, which includes Nvidia and Tesla. Big Tech can also include Chinese companies such as Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, and Xiaomi (BATX).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meta Platforms</span> American multinational technology conglomerate

Meta Platforms, Inc., doing business as Meta, and formerly named Facebook, Inc., and TheFacebook, Inc., is an American multinational technology conglomerate based in Menlo Park, California. The company owns and operates Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp, among other products and services. Advertising accounts for 97.8 percent of its revenue. Originally known as the parent company of the Facebook service, as Facebook, Inc., it was rebranded to its current name in 2021 to "reflect its focus on building the metaverse", an integrated environment linking the company's products and services.

Meta Platforms, Inc., has been involved in many lawsuits since its founding in 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Markets Act</span> European Union regulation on digital platforms

The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is an EU regulation that aims to make the digital economy fairer and more contestable. The regulation entered into force on 1 November 2022 and became applicable, for the most part, on 2 May 2023.

<i>Man of Many</i> Australian independent digital lifestyle magazine

Man of Many is an Australian independent digital lifestyle publication and website founded by Scott Purcell and Frank Arthur in 2012 that focuses on men's lifestyle, technology and consumer product news.

The Public Interest Journalism Initiative (PIJI) is an independent Australian research and public policy institute, established in Melbourne in 2018. It is a registered not-for-profit charitable organisation that is focused on research into sustainability in the news media sector. It was founded by a group of university academics, including members of the Public Interest Journalism Foundation, and news media industry figures. It was established with philanthropic funding from the Susan McKinnon Foundation, Australian Communities Foundation and Hecht Trust.

The Online News Act, known commonly as Bill C-18, is a Canadian federal statute. Introduced in the 44th Canadian Parliament, passed by the Senate on June 15, 2023, and receiving royal assent on June 22, 2023, the act will implement a framework under which digital news intermediaries that hold an asymmetric position must bargain with online news publishers to compensate them for the act of reproducing or facilitating access to their content via their platforms.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Treasury Laws Amendment (News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code) Act 2021 (Cth)
  2. "Understanding Facebook's News Ban in Australia, and What it Means for the Platform Moving Forward". Google Partner Team. 2021. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 Barbaschow, Asha (10 December 2020). "Media Bargaining Code enters Parliament despite Google and Facebook's best efforts". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 15 February 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 "News media bargaining code". Australian Competition & Consumer Commission . 26 July 2020. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  5. 1 2 3 Eisenberg 2024, p. 9.
  6. Frydenberg, Josh; Morrison, Scott; Porter, Christian; Fletcher, Paul (12 December 2019). "Response to Digital Platforms Inquiry" (Press release). Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  7. Frydenberg, Josh; Fletcher, Paul (8 December 2020). "News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code". The Treasury (Press release). Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
  8. 1 2 Rebeiro, Celina (30 August 2020). "Can Australia Force Google and Facebook to Pay for News?". Wired. Archived from the original on 3 September 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  9. Barbaschow, Asha (16 February 2021). "Media Bargaining Code amendments include a more 'streamlined' algorithm change notice". ZDNet . Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  10. Turvill, William (17 September 2020). "Australian documents reveal how News Corp, Mail and other publishers plan to battle tech giants on global scale". Press Gazette . Archived from the original on 17 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  11. "News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code legislation". About the ABC. Archived from the original on 20 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  12. Visentin, Lisa (7 December 2020). "ABC, SBS included in news media code as tech giants win concessions". Sydney Morning Herald . Archived from the original on 5 March 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  13. "Microsoft Supports Australian Government Proposal Addressing News Media and Digital Platforms". Microsoft News Centre Australia. 3 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  14. Schlosser, Kurt (3 February 2021). "As Google fights with Australia, Microsoft promotes Bing and says it wouldn't threaten to leave country". GeekWire . Archived from the original on 19 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  15. "Tech Tent: Facebook v Australia - two sides to the story". BBC News. 19 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  16. Safo, Nova; Conlon, Rose (18 February 2021). "Facebook blocks news in Australia". Marketplace. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  17. Swisher, Kara (18 February 2021). "Opinion | A New-Media Showdown in Australia". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 20 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  18. Thompson, Ben (20 August 2020). "Australia's News Media Bargaining Code, Breaking Down the Code, Australia's Fake News". Stratechery by Ben Thompson. Archived from the original on 22 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  19. Wilson, Cam (19 February 2021). "Kevin Rudd Says Australia Will Become The US In 10 Years Due To Rupert Murdoch". Gizmodo . Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  20. Visentin, Lisa (19 February 2021). "Media bargaining code will entrench Murdoch empire's dominance: Rudd". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  21. Keane, Bernard (5 February 2021). "Media abandons balance in pursuit of Google's billions". Crikey . Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  22. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, p. 3.
  23. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, p. 1.
  24. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, p. 6.
  25. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, pp. 8–9.
  26. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, p. 11.
  27. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, p. 14.
  28. Bossio, Carson & Meese 2024, p. 9.
  29. Bruns et al. 2024.
  30. Hutchinson, Andrew (19 February 2021). "Understanding Facebook's News Ban in Australia, and What it Means for the Platform Moving Forward". Social Media Today . Archived from the original on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
  31. Hitch, Georgia; Clarke, Melissa (23 January 2021). "Google says it will pull its search engine from Australia if it is forced to pay news publishers to host their content". ABC News . Archived from the original on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
  32. "Australia's Seven West Media strikes deal with Google for news". Radio New Zealand . 16 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  33. Meade, Amanda (17 February 2021). "Nine agrees to join Google News Showcase in Australia for reported $30m a year". The Guardian . Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  34. Rigby, Brittney (17 February 2021). "News Corp joins Google News Showcase, will receive 'significant payments'". Mumbrella . Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  35. Meese, James (18 February 2021). "Why Google is now funnelling millions into media outlets, as Facebook pulls news for Australia". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 19 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  36. Easton, William (31 August 2020). "An Update About Changes to Facebook's Services in Australia". Facebook Australia & New Zealand. Archived from the original on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  37. 1 2 Easton, William (17 February 2021). "Changes to Sharing and Viewing News on Facebook in Australia". Facebook Australia & New Zealand. Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  38. "Facebook threatens news sharing ban in Australia". BBC News. 1 September 2020. Archived from the original on 27 March 2021. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
  39. McGuirk, Rod (18 February 2021). "Facebook blocks Australians from accessing news on platform". Associated Press . Archived from the original on 18 February 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  40. McGuirk, Rod (17 February 2021). "In Australia, Google makes publisher deals, Facebook walks". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 17 February 2021. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  41. Silk, Marty (17 February 2021). "Facebook restores health, emergency pages". 7News. Seven West Media. Archived from the original on 30 October 2023. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  42. Taylor, Josh (18 February 2021). "Facebook's botched Australia news ban hits health departments, charities and its own pages". The Guardian . Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  43. Coggan, Maggie (18 February 2021). "Charities swept up in media bargaining fight, as Facebook cracks down on Aussie news". Pro Bono Australia. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  44. Meade, Amanda (18 February 2021). "Prime minister Scott Morrison attacks Facebook for 'arrogant' move to 'unfriend Australia'". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  45. Shead, Sam (19 February 2021). "It will 'annoy a huge group of the population': How Australians have responded to Facebook's news ban". CNBC. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  46. "What experts think of Facebook's news ban". The University of Sydney. 18 February 2021. Archived from the original on 19 February 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2021.
  47. Newton, Casey (18 February 2021). "Facebook calls Australia's bluff – But Google gives in. What's next?". Platformer. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  48. Faruqi, Osman (21 February 2021). "Facebook news ban was a predictable move". Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 22 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  49. "Facebook blocks Australian users from viewing or sharing news". BBC News . 19 February 2021. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
  50. Snape, Jack (22 February 2021). "Government escalates feud with Facebook over news ban, pulling its ads in fight over media bargaining rules". ABC News. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
  51. 1 2 Purtill, James (22 February 2022). "Facebook, Google, Twitter release industry code to fight spread of disinformation". ABC News. Archived from the original on 22 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  52. Baker, Nick (18 February 2021). "Outrage as Facebook blocks access to news content in Australia". NBC News. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  53. "Australia: Big Tech firms unveil anti-disinformation code". Deutsche Welle . 22 February 2021. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  54. Choudhury, Saheli Roy (22 February 2021). "Facebook to restore news pages for Australian users in coming days". CNBC. Archived from the original on 31 October 2023. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  55. Crowe, David; Sakkal, Paul (11 December 2024). "Australia fights back against Zuckerberg with social media penalty fees". Sydney Morning Herald. Nine Entertainment Co. Retrieved 11 December 2024.
  56. Basford Canales, Sarah (11 December 2024). "Albanese government to force tech giants to keep paying media publishers for news". Guardian. Retrieved 11 December 2024.
  57. Grueskin 2022.
  58. 1 2 3 Schiffrin 2022.
  59. 1 2 Flew 2023.
  60. Saeed, Danyaal (4 March 2024). "After Meta's exit, where to next for Australia's news media bargaining code?". Crikey . Archived from the original on 19 November 2024. Retrieved 19 November 2024.
  61. Bruns 2024.

Further reading