Online News Act

Last updated

Online News Act
Parliament-Ottawa.jpg
Parliament of Canada
  • An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada
CitationS.C. 2023, c. 23
Passed by House of Commons of Canada
PassedDecember 14, 2022 [1]
Passed by Senate of Canada
PassedJune 15, 2023
Assented toJune 22, 2023
Legislative history
First chamber: House of Commons of Canada
Bill titleC-18
Introduced by Minister of Canadian Heritage Pablo Rodriguez
Committee responsible Canadian Heritage
First reading April 5, 2022
Second reading May 31, 2022
Voting summary
  • 207 voted for
  • 116 [2] voted against
Considered by the Canadian Heritage CommitteeSeptember 23, 2022 — December 9, 2022
Third reading December 14, 2022
Voting summary
  • 213 voted for
  • 114 [3] voted against
Committee report
Second chamber: Senate of Canada
Bill titleC-18
Member(s) in chargeLegislative Deputy to the Government Representative in the Senate Raymonde Gagné [4]
Committee responsible Transport and Communication
First readingFebruary 2, 2023
Second readingApril 18, 2023
Voting summary
  • 61 voted for
  • 14 [5] voted against
Considered by the Transport and Communication CommitteeApril 25, 2023 — June 14, 2023
Third readingJune 15, 2023
Voting summary
  • 51 voted for
  • 23 [6] voted against
Committee report
Related legislation
Online Streaming Act
Status: In force

The Online News Act (French : Loi sur les nouvelles en ligne), known commonly as Bill C-18, is a Canadian federal statute. Introduced in the 44th Canadian Parliament, passed by the Senate on June 15, 2023, and receiving royal assent on June 22, 2023, the act will implement a framework under which digital news intermediaries (including search engines and social networking services) that hold an asymmetric position must bargain with online news publishers to compensate them for the act of reproducing or facilitating access to their content via their platforms.

Contents

Purpose

The goal of the law is to enhance the sustainability of the Canadian digital news market by "establish[ing] a framework through which digital news intermediary operators and news businesses may enter into agreements respecting news content that is made available by digital news intermediaries." [7] The bill and its provisions will be enforced under regulations that will be regulated by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). [7] [8] The exact regulatory policies will be determined by the CRTC, with public consultations to begin in late-2023, the bargaining code to be published in mid-2024, and enforcement to begin by late-2024 or early-2025. [9]

The primary component of Bill C-18 is a provision that allows an eligible news business (acting alone or in a group) to initiate mandatory bargaining with a digital news intermediary—an online communications platform (such as a search engine or social media service, excluding platforms whose primary purpose is to allow users to communicate with each other privately) that reproduces news content in whole or in part, or otherwise facilitates access to it by any means—if it is determined that there is a "significant bargaining power imbalance" between the intermediary's operator and the news business (based on size, strategic advantages, and whether they hold a "prominent market position"). [8] [10]

News businesses are eligible under the Act if they are either: [8] [10]

The process involves three steps: bargaining, mediation, and "final offer" arbitration. [11] An intermediary may request an exemption order from the CRTC if it certifies that they have entered into agreements with news businesses that meet requirements for fair compensation and other factors specified by Section 11(1). [11] [8]

Reception

Supporters of the bill argue that it would address an imbalance between dominant tech companies and Canadian publishers, by requiring them to provide fair compensation for the dissemination of news content via their platforms. The trade association News Media Canada stated that the bill would "restore fairness and ensure the sustainability of the Canadian news media ecosystem." [12] The logic is that in the absence of the law, intermediaries leverage Canadian-produced news content without compensation due to their dominance, and thus hold an asymmetric bargaining position. [13] [14] [15]

Writing for the Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts , Ariel Katz—associate professor at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law—argued that the bill enables drastic measures under questionable assumptions, including new rights for news publishers that are absent in the Copyright Act, allowing collective bargaining (effectively media cartels) beyond what is allowed by the Status of the Artist Act, and providing large exemptions from the Competition Act . He argued that shielding media companies from competition, even the largest ones, will "sedate" these public watchdogs. [16]

University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist argued that the Online News Act and Online Streaming Act represented misplaced priorities by the Justin Trudeau government, arguing that it was focusing more on using "big tech" as an "ATM" to fund Canada's media and publishing industries rather than focusing on "problematic conduct" via information privacy and data governance laws. [17] He also criticized the bill for not taking into account the impact of generative artificial intelligence on the news industry (with its definition of an intermediary not being able to cover companies such as OpenAI), and noted that according to Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, the bill would only apply to Google and Meta Platforms—leaving out other Big Tech companies such as Apple Inc. and Microsoft, as well as X (formerly Twitter). [18] Also, the definition of eligible news businesses was expanded, and goes beyond the standards established under the Income Tax Act which govern Qualified Canadian Journalism Organizations. As a result, the bill would require payments to broadcasters that might not produce journalism or original news content. Geist argues "That isn't funding for journalism or journalists. It is creating a subsidy program that only requires a CRTC-issued licence." [19]

Sue Gardner believed that Bill C-18 was a response to a perceived failure of legacy publishers to adapt their business models to the disruption of digital media, that media outlets "vigorously compete to maximize their presences" on Google and Facebook because of the exposure they provided, and acknowledged that in Crooks v. Newton, the Supreme Court established that hyperlinks were an "indispensable" aspect of the Internet and "should be facilitated rather than discouraged." She felt that the law would only provide benefits to legacy companies due to the eligibility requirements, and that it would reduce the accessibility of Canadian journalism if social media platforms chose to block the ability to share links to news in Canada. [10] She also felt that a requirement for intermediaries to not discriminate against or otherwise give news businesses undue or unreasonable preference could be strictly interpreted as prohibiting any sort of algorithmic ranking or targeting of news content by intermediaries. [10]

On August 2, 2023, Pierre Poilievreleader of the Conservative Party opposition—stated that the bill was an instrument of censorship by the Liberal Party government; it was noted that the Conservatives' platform under previous leader Erin O'Toole had included proposals for a similar scheme. [20]

Reaction

Screenshot of the Instagram page for CBC News in March 2024, showing a notice of unavailability in Canada in place of its posts. Instagram blocking CBC News in Canada.png
Screenshot of the Instagram page for CBC News in March 2024, showing a notice of unavailability in Canada in place of its posts.

After the bill received royal assent, Google and Meta Platforms (including Facebook and Instagram) announced that in order to relieve their obligations under Bill C-18, they would no longer make news content available to users in Canada via their services. [21] Google's president of global affairs Kent Walker stated that the bill was "unworkable" and "exposes us to uncapped financial liability simply for facilitating access to news from Canadian publications". Due to Bill C-18, Google stated that it would be withdrawing all Canadian publishers from programs such as Google News Showcase (in which Google enters into agreements to pay news outlets to curate highlighted stories featured in widgets on Google News and its mobile apps), whose launch in territories such as Australia came amid the implementation of similar bargaining rules. [22] [23] [24] Google had initially stated that it was willing to pay its share (two thirds of $150 million in estimated annual revenue from the bill), but that it wanted to contribute to a single fund rather than pay individual publishers. [25]

Meta began to implement its blocks in late-July 2023; it is blocking all links to news content, as well as accounts of news organizations, for Canadian users of Facebook and Instagram, regardless of whether or not they are based in Canada. [21] [26] The restrictions had also briefly applied to the accounts of news satire website The Beaverton due to an automated classification based on metadata, but this was resolved after consultations with the site's founder. [27] Concerns were raised that the blockage of news content from social networks could result in the wider accessibility of fake news content. [24]

Rodriguez criticized Meta for its intent to block news in Canada rather than agree to provide compensation (as it eventually did in Australia), [28] [21] and stated that their actions were premature because the bill has not yet been formally implemented. [15] He announced that the federal government would suspend its purchasing of advertising on Facebook and Instagram effective immediately, considering it inappropriate to do so "while they refuse to pay their fair share to Canadian news organizations". [15] Other Canadian jurisdictions (including the provinces of British Columbia and Quebec) [29] [30] as well as the CBC, [29] [31] labour unions Unifor and FTQ, [32] and media companies that supported the bill, also announced that they would pull their advertising from Meta platforms effective immediately. [33] [34] [35]

On July 26, 2023, Rodriguez was reassigned to Minister of Transport, and Pascale St-Onge was named his successor. Pascale stated that the government would continue to "[stand] our ground", and that "Canadians expect tech giants to pay their fair share". [36]

In August 2023, a complaint was filed under the Competition Act by the CBC, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB), and News Media Canada. The complaint alleged that Meta was abusing its "already dominant position in advertising and social media distribution" and "substantial control" of the news industry, by blocking content and not allowing good faith negotiations with news businesses, thus denying them fair compensation and impairing their ability to "compete effectively in the news publishing and online advertising market". [37] [38] Geist considered the complaint to be "flawed", arguing that Meta did not have "substantial control" over access to news because social media accounted for 17-30% of traffic to news websites according to Senate testimony, Rodriguez had repeatedly mentioned that blocking news content was a potential "business choice" for compliance with the Act, and that the complaint contained contradictory statements alleging that blocking news was "degrading" Meta but "entrenching its dominant market power" at the same time. [38]

Meta's decision had a negative impact on Indigenous communities, with Ku'ku'kwes News, Shubie FM [note 1] and PSAs from the Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke being among those that had their content blocked. [39] Other small news outlets, such as New Brunswick's River Valley Sun and CHCO-TV, [40] as well as Nunavut's Nunatsiaq News, had also expressed concern or disapproval towards Meta's actions. [41]

Amid the 2023 Canadian wildfires, Meta received further calls from Rodriguez and St-Onge to lift its preemptive restrictions on news content, arguing that it was hindering the distribution of up-to-date information. [42]

On October 2, 2023, the Computer & Communications Industry Association filed comments in response to the Canadian Heritage regarding proposed regulations for the implementation of the law, and has raised concerns regarding the policy of mandatory bargaining and link taxes and highlighted how the law could violate certain provisions of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement. [43]

On November 29, 2023, Google said it reached an agreement with the Canadian federal government to comply with Bill C-18, under which it will make annual payments of around $100 million CAD to a collective fund that will be managed by the media sector. [44] Geist argued that this agreement "upends" the original intent of the bill, stating that " the government was ultimately able to strike a deal largely by changing the law, albeit through yet-to-be released regulations. After claiming for months that it would not get involved in negotiations and specifying in considerable detail what any deals between platforms and media companies needed to look like, the government dropped all of that and simply negotiated the best deal it could get on behalf of Canadian news outlets." [44]

See also

Notes

  1. Both Ku'ku'kwes News and Shubie FM are based in the Sipekneꞌkatik First Nation in Nova Scotia

Related Research Articles

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is the chief competition regulator of the Government of Australia, located within the Department of the Treasury. It was established in 1995 with the amalgamation of the Australian Trade Practices Commission and the Prices Surveillance Authority to administer the Trade Practices Act 1974, which was renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 on 1 January 2011. The ACCC's mandate is to protect consumer rights and business rights and obligations, to perform industry regulation and price monitoring, and to prevent illegal anti-competitive behaviour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in Australia</span> Overview of mass media in Australia

Mass media in Australia spans traditional and digital formats, and caters mostly to its predominantly English-speaking population. It is delivered in a variety of formats including radio, television, paper, internet and IPTV. Varieties include local, regional, state, federal and international sources of media, reporting on Australian news, opinion, policy, issues and culture.

The National Do Not Call List (DNCL) is a list administered by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) that enables residents of Canada to decide whether or not to receive telemarketing calls. It was first announced by the Government of Canada on 13 December 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Geist</span> Canadian academic on internet and e-commerce law

Michael Allen Geist is a Canadian academic, and the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-Commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He is the editor of four books on copyright law and privacy law, and he edits two newsletters on Canadian information technology and privacy law.

In Canada, appeals by the judiciary to community standards and the public interest are the ultimate determinants of which forms of expression may legally be published, broadcast, or otherwise publicly disseminated. Other public organisations with the authority to censor include some tribunals and courts under provincial human rights laws, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, along with self-policing associations of private corporations such as the Canadian Association of Broadcasters and the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council.

<i>Broadcasting Act</i> (Canada) Canadian law regarding broadcasting and telecommunications

The Broadcasting Act, given royal assent on 1 February 1991, is an act of the Parliament of Canada regarding broadcasting of telecommunications in the country.

The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is a British non-profit organisation with offices in London and Washington, D.C. that works to stop the spread of online hate speech and disinformation. It campaigns to deplatform people that it believes promote hate or misinformation, and campaigns to restrict media organisations such as The Daily Wire from advertising. CCDH is a member of the Stop Hate For Profit coalition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facebook</span> Social networking service owned by Meta Platforms

Facebook is a social media and social networking service owned by American technology conglomerate Meta Platforms. Created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with four other Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes, its name derives from the face book directories often given to American university students. Membership was initially limited to Harvard students, gradually expanding to other North American universities. Since 2006, Facebook allows everyone to register from 13 years old, except in the case of a handful of nations, where the age limit is 14 years. As of December 2022, Facebook claimed 3 billion monthly active users. As of October 2023, Facebook ranked as the 3rd most visited website in the world with 22.56% of its traffic coming from the United States. It was the most downloaded mobile app of the 2010s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in Canada</span> Overview of the Internet in Canada

Canada ranks as the 21st in the world for Internet usage with 31.77 million users as of July 2016 (est), making up 89.8% of the population. According to Harvard researchers, Canada has some of the lowest internet standards among OECD countries, as a result of high costs and slow internet speeds.

Facebook has been the subject of criticism and legal action since it was founded in 2004. Criticisms include the outsize influence Facebook has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well as Facebook's influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. Notable issues include Internet privacy, such as use of a widespread "like" button on third-party websites tracking users, possible indefinite records of user information, automatic facial recognition software, and its role in the workplace, including employer-employee account disclosure. The use of Facebook can have negative psychological and physiological effects that include feelings of sexual jealousy, stress, lack of attention, and social media addiction that in some cases is comparable to drug addiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roskomnadzor</span> Russian government agency

The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media, abbreviated as Roskomnadzor (RKN), is the Russian federal executive agency responsible for monitoring, controlling and censoring Russian mass media. Its areas of responsibility include electronic media, mass communications, information technology and telecommunications, supervising compliance with the law, protecting the confidentiality of personal data being processed, and organizing the work of the radio-frequency service.

Net neutrality in Canada is a debated issue, but not to the degree of partisanship in other nations, such as the United States, in part because of its federal regulatory structure and pre-existing supportive laws that were enacted decades before the debate arose. In Canada, Internet service providers (ISPs) generally provide Internet service in a neutral manner. Some notable incidents otherwise have included Bell Canada's throttling of certain protocols and Telus's censorship of a specific website critical of the company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instagram</span> Social media platform owned by Meta Platforms

Instagram is an photo and video sharing social networking service owned by Meta Platforms. It allows users to upload media that can be edited with filters, be organized by hashtags, and be associated with a location via geographical tagging. Posts can be shared publicly or with preapproved followers. Users can browse other users' content by tags and locations, view trending content, like photos, and follow other users to add their content to a personal feed. A Meta-operated image-centric social media platform, it is available on iOS, Android, Windows 10, and the web. Users can take photos and edit them using built-in filters and other tools, then share them on other social media platforms like Facebook. It supports 32 languages including English, Spanish, French, Korean, and Japanese.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Censorship by Facebook</span>

Facebook has been involved in multiple controversies involving censorship of content, removing or omitting information from its services in order to comply with company policies, legal demands, and government censorship laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Tech</span> Collectivity of the largest technology companies

Big Tech, also known as the Tech Giants, are the largest information technology companies. The term most often refers to the Big Five tech companies in the United States: Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft. In China, Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, and Xiaomi (BATX) are the equivalent of the Big Five. Big Tech can also include smaller tech companies with high valuations, such as Netflix and Nvidia, or non-tech companies with high-tech practices, such as the automaker Tesla.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meta Platforms</span> American multinational technology conglomerate

Meta Platforms, Inc., doing business as Meta, and formerly named Facebook, Inc., and TheFacebook, Inc., is an American multinational technology conglomerate based in Menlo Park, California. The company owns and operates Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp, among other products and services. Meta ranks among the largest American information technology companies, alongside other Big Five corporations Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. The company was ranked #31 on the Forbes Global 2000 ranking in 2023.

Facebook, Inc., has been involved in many lawsuits since its founding in 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Services Act</span> European Union regulation on digital services content

The Digital Services Act is a regulation in EU law to update the Electronic Commerce Directive 2000 regarding illegal content, transparent advertising, and disinformation. It was submitted along with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) by the European Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on 15 December 2020. The DSA was prepared by the Executive Vice President of the European Commission for A Europe Fit for the Digital Age Margrethe Vestager and by the European Commissioner for Internal Market Thierry Breton, as members of the Von der Leyen Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">News Media Bargaining Code</span> Australian law

The News Media Bargaining Code is a law designed to have large technology platforms that operate in Australia pay local news publishers for the news content made available or linked on their platforms. The law's definition of news is broad, including "content that reports, investigates or explains ... current issues or events of public significance for Australians at a local, regional or national level." Originating in April 2020, when the Australian Government asked the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) to begin drafting it, it achieved broad support in the Australian Parliament but staunch opposition from Facebook and Google. In response, on 18 February 2021, Facebook blocked Australian users from sharing or viewing news content on its platform. The Australian government strongly criticised the move, saying it demonstrated the "immense market power of these digital social giants". A few days later, Australia and Facebook came to an agreement on restoring news pages.

<i>Online Streaming Act</i> Canadian federal legislation

The Online Streaming Act, commonly known as Bill C-11, is a bill introduced in the 44th Canadian Parliament. It was first introduced on November 3, 2020, by Minister of Canadian Heritage Steven Guilbeault during the second session of the 43rd Canadian Parliament. Commonly known as Bill C-10, the bill was passed in the House of Commons on June 22, 2021, but failed to pass the Senate before Parliament was dissolved for a federal election. It was reintroduced with amendments as the Online Streaming Act during the first session of the 44th Canadian Parliament in February 2022, passed in the House of Commons on June 21, 2022, and passed in the Senate on February 2, 2023. It received royal assent on April 27, 2023, after the consideration of amendments by the House.

References

Citations

  1. Online News Act , S.C. 2023, c. 23
  2. "Vote Detail – 112 – Members of Parliament". House of Commons of Canada. May 31, 2022. Archived from the original on July 3, 2023. Retrieved July 2, 2023.
  3. "Vote Detail – 244 – Members of Parliament". House of Commons of Canada. December 14, 2022. Archived from the original on August 1, 2023. Retrieved July 2, 2023.
  4. "Debates, Issue 96 (February 2, 2023)". Senate of Canada. February 2, 2023. Archived from the original on July 3, 2023. Retrieved July 2, 2023.
  5. "Debates, Issue 112 (April 18, 2023)". Senate of Canada. April 18, 2023. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved July 2, 2023.
  6. "Debates, Issue 135 (June 15, 2023)". Senate of Canada. June 15, 2023. Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 2, 2023.
  7. 1 2 Katz 2023, p. 345.
  8. 1 2 3 4 "Government Bill (House of Commons) C-18 (44-1) – Royal Assent". parl.ca. Parliament of Canada. Archived from the original on August 6, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  9. Government of Canada, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) (August 24, 2023). "Building a bargaining framework for the Online News Act". crtc.gc.ca. Archived from the original on August 25, 2023. Retrieved August 29, 2023.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Gardner, Sue (October 12, 2022). "Sue Gardner: Bill C-18 is Bad for Journalism and Bad for Canada". Max Bell School of Public Policy. Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  11. 1 2 Katz 2023, pp. 345–346.
  12. Coletta, Amanda; De Vynck, Gerrit (June 22, 2023). "Meta says it will block news from Facebook, Instagram in Canada". Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 2, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  13. Katz 2023, p. 346.
  14. Pahwa, Nitish (June 29, 2023). "Why Canada's Attempt to Save Journalism May End Up Crushing It Instead". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339. Archived from the original on July 1, 2023. Retrieved July 1, 2023.
  15. 1 2 3 Mundie, Jessica (June 22, 2023). "Canadians will no longer have access to news content on Facebook and Instagram, Meta says". CBC News. Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  16. Katz 2023, p. 366.
  17. Geist, Michael (June 23, 2023). "Made-in-Canada Internet Takes Shape with Risks of Blocked Streaming Services and News Sharing as Bill C-18 Receives Royal Assent". Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  18. Geist, Michael (June 20, 2023). "As Government Moves to Cut Off Bill C-18 Debate, the Reality is Artificial Intelligence Renders Bill Already Out of Date". Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
  19. Geist, Michael (February 25, 2023). "Why Justin Trudeau is Wrong About Bill C-18 and Google's Response to Mandated Payments for Links". michaelgeist.ca. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved September 4, 2023.
  20. Djuric, Mickey (August 2, 2023). "Conservatives ran on similar media policy as Liberals, but now claim it's censorship". CTV News. The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on August 5, 2023. Retrieved August 5, 2023.
  21. 1 2 3 "'Disaster': warning for democracy as experts condemn Meta over Canada news ban". The Guardian. August 4, 2023. Archived from the original on August 26, 2023. Retrieved August 5, 2023.
  22. Meese, James (February 18, 2021). "Why Google is now funnelling millions into media outlets, as Facebook pulls news for Australia". The Conversation. Archived from the original on February 19, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2021.
  23. "An update on Canada's Bill C-18 and our Search and News products". Google. June 29, 2023. Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  24. 1 2 Lindeman, Tracey (August 4, 2023). "'Disaster': warning for democracy as experts condemn Meta over Canada news ban". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  25. Geist, Michael (November 29, 2023). "Salvaging Bill C-18: Government Upends Legislation To Bring Google Onside the Online News Act - Michael Geist". Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
  26. "Meta Begins Blocking News in Canada". The New York Times. August 2, 2023. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
  27. Mickey Djuric (August 10, 2023). "No joke: Satirical websites get caught up in Meta's quest to block news in Canada". Toronto Star. The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  28. Al Mallees, Nojoud; Deschamps, Tara (July 5, 2023). "Ottawa will stop advertising on Facebook, Instagram amid news blocking row". Global News . The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on July 15, 2023. Retrieved July 16, 2023.
  29. 1 2 "Media companies pull back from Facebook, Instagram as Meta plans to block Canadian news from services". The Globe and Mail . The Canadian Press. July 5, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  30. Holliday, Ian (July 13, 2023). "B.C. pulling ads from Facebook and Instagram over Meta's Bill C-18 response". CTV News . Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  31. "CBC/Radio-Canada pausing advertising on Facebook and Instagram". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (Press release). July 5, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  32. "La FTQ annonce la suspension de ses achats de publicité chez Meta". L'actualité (in Canadian French). La Presse Canadienne. August 4, 2023. Archived from the original on August 5, 2023. Retrieved August 5, 2023.
  33. Saint-Arnaud, Pierre (July 17, 2023). "Quebec companies start to redirect advertising dollars from web giants to news media". CTV News Montreal. The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  34. Baxter, David (July 17, 2023). "Corus joins growing Canadian boycott of Meta over news blocking". Global News. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  35. Orozco, Santiago Arias (July 6, 2023). "Toronto Star's parent company immediately suspends advertising on Facebook and Instagram". Toronto Star . Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved July 19, 2023.
  36. Woolf, Marie (July 27, 2023). "New Heritage Minister says she will stand ground against Facebook, Google on news bill". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on August 20, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  37. Shakil, Ismail; Kachwala, Zaheer (August 9, 2023). "Canadian publishers seek antitrust probe of Meta blocking news". Reuters. Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  38. 1 2 Geist, Michael (August 8, 2023). "Media Publishers File Flawed Competition Act Application Over Meta Blocking News Links Due to Bill C-18". Archived from the original on August 11, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  39. Baker III, Oscar (August 11, 2023). "Meta's removal of Canadian news impacting Indigenous media and communities". CBC News. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
  40. Rana, Arfa (August 3, 2023). "Loss of Facebook for sharing stories a blow to small N.B. news outlets, communities". CBC News. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
  41. Murray, Nick (August 11, 2023). "Meta's Canadian news ban 'an assault on local journalism,' says Nunavut newspaper publisher". CBC News. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
  42. Rosenzweig-Ziff, Dan; Nix, Naomi (August 19, 2023). "As wildfires spread, Canadian leaders ask Meta to reverse its news ban". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on August 20, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  43. "CCIA Files Comments with Canadian Heritage on Proposed Regulations for Online News Act". Computer & Communications Industry Association. October 3, 2023. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
  44. 1 2 Thibeault, Daniel; Cochrane, David; Major, Darren (November 29, 2023). "Federal government reaches deal with Google on Online News Act". CBC News. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 4, 2023.

Sources

Further reading