Newtown Act

Last updated

Newtown Act
Act of Parliament
Kingdom Ireland.svg
Parliament of Ireland
Long title An Act to amend and make more effectual an act, entitled, an act for better regulating elections of members to serve in parliament, and for the more effectual quieting of corporations, and securing the rights of persons who have been, or shall be, elected into the offices of aldermen and burgesses within any corporations of this kingdom.
Citation 21 Geo. 2 c. 10 (I)
Introduced by Thomas Le Hunt
Territorial extent  Kingdom of Ireland
Dates
Royal assent 9 April 1748
Other legislation
Repealed by Statute Law Revision Act 2007 (Republic of Ireland)
Relates to19 Geo. 2. c. 11 (I)
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Newtown Act [nb 1] (21 Geo. 2 c. 10 (I)) was an act of the Parliament of Ireland regulating municipal corporations, in particular the manner in which parliamentary boroughs elected members to the Irish House of Commons.

Contents

Provisions

Clauses 1 to 7 aimed to curtail faggot voters by requiring a rentcharge property qualification for the franchise to be either over ten pounds or else held for over one year prior to the election. This restricted temporary conveyancing of parts of a freehold from its true owner to multiple fictitious owners. These provisions were an uncontentious technical amendment of an act passed in 1745 (19 Geo. 2. c. 11 (I)). [3]

The oath required of electors under the 1745 act was amended by clause 5 of the Newtown Act to reflect the changed property restrictions. The revised oath restated unchanged the portion which prohibited Irish Roman Catholics from voting:

I am not a Papist, or married to a Papist, nor do I educate, or suffer to be educated, any of my children under the age of fourteen years in the popish religion.

Clause 8 was controversially appended to the bill at a late stage. It explicitly permitted non-residents to become burgesses (members of the corporation). Burgesses were the sole parliamentary electors in corporation boroughs, and in freeman boroughs they were also crucial since they had the power to grant or refuse freeman status. The patrons of pocket boroughs ensured the burgesses were loyal placemen. Permitting non-resident burgesses was necessary as only members of the established Church of Ireland could be burgesses, and many boroughs were rotten boroughs or otherwise underdeveloped places where few Protestants were willing to settle. This provision was stated to apply to boroughs other than those with city status. The 1835 Report of the Commissioners on Municipal Corporations in Ireland questioned whether it was applicable in the case of Armagh and Tuam, both being episcopal sees and hence "cities" in William Blackstone's definition in Commentaries on the Laws of England . In fact, non-residents had served on both corporations. [4] [5]

Enactment

The act's common name comes from Newtownards in County Down, where the Newtownards constituency was the subject of litigation between Brabazon Ponsonby, 1st Earl of Bessborough and Alexander Stewart. [6] In 1744 Stewart bought from Bessborough's unstable stepson Robert Colvill the manor of Newtown (later renaming its seat Mount Stewart). Bessborough had been managing the borough within the manor for Colvill, and Stewart set about replacing Bessborough's appointees on its corporation, giving him control of its two MPs. Bessborough launched a court case in 1747, arguing that Stewart's burgesses were ineligible as they were not resident in the borough. This action prompted the addition of clause 8 to the bill.

The heads of the bill were reported by the Committee of the Whole House of Commons on 17 December 1747. The heads were then sent for pre-approval, as required by Poynings' Law, to the Privy Council of Ireland in January 1748 and then the Privy Council of Great Britain in March 1748, both of which debated it strongly and made amendments. [7] Petitions were considered from Stewart and from The Irish Society. The amended bill was returned to the Commons on 28 March and sent to the Irish House of Lords on 31 March.

Historical opinion

The act's negative reputation is ascribed by A. P. W. Malcomson to James Caulfeild, 1st Earl of Charlemont, who called it "the most outrageous and unconstitutional that ever was enacted" in his 1783 memoirs, which present clause 8 as instigated by Stewart solely to win his court case. William Lynch in 1831 was also critical, stating that all ancient boroughs in Ireland were de jure potwallopers, under the common law as "enforced by the statutes of 10th Hen. VII. ch. 7, [8] and 33rd Hen. VIII"; [9] in this view the 1748 act was one of a series of encroachments on an ancient right. [10]

Malcomson argues that Charlemont's account is coloured by political bias and that clause 8 was "only simplifying and making more intelligible the legal position as it already stood". Malcomson accepts the court case as the motivation for clause 8, but suggests that MPs were not acting in Stewart's particular interest but from "dread and uncertainty" of a decision's effect on their own constituency. Stewart's case was decided in his favour in 1758, without reference to the Newtown Act. Malcomson suggests the act did not apply to the case as clause 8 was not retroactive, and that the clause's only effect was between 1748 and 1758, during which time it forestalled any copycat cases being started.

The allowance of non-resident burgesses has been presented as a worsening of the Irish House of Commons' unrepresentativeness, and as intended solely to increase the hold of patrons over their boroughs. Malcomson disputes this, suggesting the patron's hold was tight in any case: "what was wrong with the burgesses ... was not that they were non-resident but that there were too few of them". Malcomson posits disadvantages of restricting the franchise to residents, including the exclusion of progressive gentry living near but outside the borough, and the difficulty of determining a prospective voter's residency in cases where a borough's boundaries were irregular or uncertain.

The act's guarantee of the franchise to non-residents resulted in a transfer of power from the local gentry and bourgeois to the larger regional landholders. [11] The latter were interested mainly in controlling the borough's MPs, and not in its municipal affairs, causing an "ossification" in town government that lasted until the Municipal Corporations (Ireland) Act 1840. [12]

Amendment and repeal

The Catholic Relief Act 1793 implicitly amended the Newtown Act, permitting Catholics to vote and specifying a different electoral oath. Clauses (sections) 1–7 of the Newtown Act were repealed by an act of 1795 (35 George III c.29). [13] The Acts of Union 1800 disenfranchised most Irish boroughs, and the corporations of many of these became defunct; clause 8 of the Newtown Act continued to apply to the remainder. In 1826, Sir John Newport tried unsuccessfully to introduced a bill to repeal clause 8. [14] The Municipal Corporations (Ireland) Act 1840 abolished most corporations and reformed the remainder. This rendered the Newtown Act obsolete. Section 8 was repealed by the Statute Law Revision (Ireland) Act 1878. [15] The entire act (only the title and preamble remained) was not formally repealed in the Republic of Ireland until the Statute Law Revision Act 2007. [16]

Footnotes

  1. ↑ The act was passed in the parliamentary session 1747–8, and is sometimes cited as the Newtown Act 1747 [1] or Newtown Act 1748. [2]

Sources

Primary
Secondary

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irish House of Commons</span> Lower house of the Parliament of Ireland that existed from 1297 until 1800

The Irish House of Commons was the lower house of the Parliament of Ireland that existed from 1297 until the end of 1800. The upper house was the House of Lords. The membership of the House of Commons was directly elected, but on a highly restrictive franchise, similar to the unreformed House of Commons in contemporary England and Great Britain. Catholics were disqualified from sitting in the Irish parliament from 1691, even though they comprised the vast majority of the Irish population.

In the United Kingdom, representative peers were those peers elected by the members of the Peerage of Scotland and the Peerage of Ireland to sit in the British House of Lords. Until 1999, all members of the Peerage of England held the right to sit in the House of Lords; they did not elect a limited group of representatives. All peers who were created after 1707 as Peers of Great Britain and after 1801 as Peers of the United Kingdom held the same right to sit in the House of Lords.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipal borough</span> Former type of British and Irish local government

A municipal borough was a type of local government district which existed in England and Wales between 1836 and 1974, in Northern Ireland from 1840 to 1973 and in the Republic of Ireland from 1840 to 2002. Broadly similar structures existed in Scotland from 1833 to 1975 with the reform of royal burghs and creation of police burghs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popery Act</span> United Kingdom legislation

An Act to prevent the further Growth of Popery was an Act of the Parliament of Ireland that was passed in 1704 designed to suppress Roman Catholicism in Ireland ("Popery"). William Edward Hartpole Lecky called it the most notorious of the Irish Penal Laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipal Corporations Act 1835</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Municipal Corporations Act 1835, sometimes known as the Municipal Reform Act, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that reformed local government in the incorporated boroughs of England and Wales. The legislation was part of the reform programme of the Whigs and followed the Reform Act 1832, which had abolished most of the rotten boroughs for parliamentary purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipal Corporations (Ireland) Act 1840</span> Law reforming town and city government in Ireland

The Municipal Corporations Act (Ireland) 1840, An Act for the Regulation of Municipal Corporations in Ireland, was passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom on 10 August 1840. It was one of the Municipal Corporations (Ireland) Acts 1840 to 1888.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliamentary Boundaries (Ireland) Act 1832</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Parliamentary Boundaries (Ireland) Act 1832 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which defined the boundaries of the 33 parliamentary boroughs which were represented in the United Kingdom House of Commons. They had originally been named in the Acts of Union 1800. Section 12 of the Representation of the People (Ireland) Act 1832, enacted on the same day, specified that the boundaries were to be defined in this separate Act.

Athlone was a parliamentary constituency in Ireland, which from 1801 to 1885 returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Bandon was a parliamentary constituency representing the town of Bandon in County Cork, Ireland from 1801 to 1885. It elected one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.

Armagh Borough was a constituency represented in the Irish House of Commons, the house of representatives of the Kingdom of Ireland, from 1613 to 1800.

Youghal was a parliamentary borough represented in the Irish House of Commons until its abolition on 1 January 1801. It was a corporation with burgesses and freemen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representation of the People (Ireland) Act 1832</span> United Kingdom law reforming the electoral system in Ireland

The Representation of the People (Ireland) Act 1832, commonly called the Irish Reform Act 1832, was an Act of Parliament that introduced wide-ranging changes to the election laws of Ireland. The act was passed at approximately the same time as the Reform Act 1832, which applied to England and Wales.

Events from the year 1748 in Ireland.

The Belfast Borough Police was the police force for Belfast from 1800 to 1865, when it was abolished and replaced by the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC). Its members, nicknamed the Bulkies, had authority within the Belfast Police District.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Honorary Freedom of Boroughs Act 1885</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Honorary Freedom of Boroughs Act 1885 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that gave the councils of municipal boroughs in England and Wales the power to award the title of honorary freeman to "persons of distinction and any persons who have rendered emininent services to the borough".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Short Titles Act 1896</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Short Titles Act 1896 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It replaces the Short Titles Act 1892.

In Ireland, the term city has somewhat differing meanings in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Museums Act 1845</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Museums Act 1845, sometimes called the Museums of Art Act 1845 or the Museums of Art in Boroughs Act, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which gave the town councils of larger municipal boroughs the power to establish museums.

A bishop's borough or bishop borough was a pocket borough in the Irish House of Commons where the patron who controlled the borough was the bishop for the time being of the diocese of the Church of Ireland whose cathedral was within the borough. All bishops were themselves ex officio members of the Irish House of Lords. Three bishop's boroughs were disenfranchised by the Acts of Union 1800, and their bishops at the time applied for the standard £15,000 compensation due to patrons of disenfranchised boroughs; however, the Commissioners rejected these claims, and awarded the money to the Board of First Fruits. Armagh City, the Archbishop of Armagh's borough, remained enfranchised at Westminster and under the archbishop's control until the Irish Reform Act 1832. Although Cashel and Tuam were originally archbishops' boroughs, they passed to lay patrons in the eighteenth century.

Ministers' money was a tax payable by householders in certain cities and towns in Ireland to fund the local Church of Ireland minister. It was introduced in 1665, modified in 1827, and abolished in 1857. The cities and towns affected were Dublin, Cork, Limerick, Waterford, Drogheda, Kilkenny, Clonmel, and Kinsale. It was levied as a rate of up to one shilling in the pound on the property's rateable value. The valuation, to a maximum of £60, was done by commissioners appointed by the Lord Lieutenant. Churchwardens appointed by the local minister collected ministers' money on the quarter days: Christmas, Lady Day, St John's Day, and Michaelmas. The 1689 Irish Parliament, which the Catholic James II summoned during the Williamite War, abolished minister's money; after James lost the war, William and Mary's 1695 Parliament annulled the 1689 one. A 1723 act provided that, in Dublin, the same valuation could be used both for ministers' money and for calculating cess, a separate local rate used for public works and poor relief. Thereafter, cess rates were often expressed in terms of pence per shilling of minister's money.

References

  1. ↑ Johnston-Liik 2006, p.247
  2. ↑ Malcomson 1973
  3. ↑ "An Act for the better regulating Elections of Members to serve in Parliament". Laws passed in Ireland for the Suppression of Popery. University of Minnesota . Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  4. ↑ Rep Comm Mun Corp Irl p.671–2 "City of Armagh" §10
  5. ↑ Rep Comm Mun Corp Irl p.432 "Borough of Tuam" §13
  6. ↑ "Constituencies: Newtown(ards)". History of the Irish Parliament.
  7. ↑ Kelly, James (28 July 2013). "The Privy Council of Ireland and the Making of Irish Laws 1692–1800". In Brown, Michael; Donlan, Seán Patrick (eds.). The Laws and Other Legalities of Ireland, 1689-1850. Ashgate. p. 64. ISBN   9781409482574 . Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  8. ↑ "An Act that none be admitted Alderman, Juror, or Freeman in no Town, but if he have been Prentice or Inhabitant in the same." Statutes at Large v.1 pp.46–47
  9. ↑ 33 Hen. 8. Sess. 2. c. 1 "An Act for the Adjournment of the Parliament and the Place to hold the same, and what Persons shall be chosen Knights and Burgesses." Statutes at Large v.1 pp.205–207
  10. ↑ Lynch, William (1831). The law of election in the ancient cities and towns of Ireland traced from original records: With an appendix of documents. London: Effingham Wilson. p. 69. Retrieved 24 May 2017.
  11. ↑ Barnard, Toby (September 2003). "Review: History of the Irish Parliament, 1692-1800 by E. M. Johnston-Liik". The English Historical Review. 118 (478). Oxford University Press: 1008–1013: 1013. doi:10.1093/ehr/118.478.1008. JSTOR   3491145.
  12. ↑ Johnston-Liik 2006, p.202
  13. ↑ "An act for regulating the election of members to serve in parliament, and for repealing the several acts therein mentioned.". Statutes passed in the Parliaments held in Ireland. Vol. 10. Dublin: George Grierson. 1799. p. 118.
  14. ↑ "NON-RESIDENT BURGESSES IN IRELAND". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . 9 March 1826. pp. vol 14 cc1247–53. Retrieved 22 March 2014.
  15. ↑ "Statute Law Revision (Ireland) Act, 1878, Schedule". Irish Statute Book . Retrieved 3 April 2017.
  16. ↑ "Pre-Union Irish Statutes Affected: 1747". Irish Statute Book . Dublin: Attorney General's office. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.