Nijhawan v. Holder

Nijhawan v. Holder
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 15, 2009
Full case name	Nijhawan v. Holder
Citations	557 U.S. 29 ( more )
Holding
For deportation purposes, fraud is an aggravated felony when the loss to the victims exceeds $10,000, and that refers to the particular circumstances in which an offender committed fraud on a particular occasion. That is, the damages amount is not an element of the crime and does not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices John P. Stevens  · Antonin Scalia Anthony Kennedy  · David Souter Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Case opinion
Majority	Breyer, joined by unanimous

Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29(2009), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, for deportation purposes, fraud is an aggravated felony when the loss to the victims exceeds $10,000, and that refers to the particular circumstances in which an offender committed fraud on a particular occasion. That is, the damages amount is not an element of the crime and does not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. ^{[1] [2]}

Background

Under 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), a noncitizen "convicted of an aggravated felony any time after admission is deportable." §1101(a)(43)(M)(i) says that an "aggravated felony" includes "an offense that... involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the... victims exceeds $10,000." ^[1]

Nijhawan, a noncitizen, was convicted of conspiring to commit mail fraud and related crimes. Because the relevant statutes did not require a finding of loss, the jury made no such finding. However, at sentencing, petitioner stipulated that the loss exceeded $100 million. He was sentenced to prison and required to make $683 million in restitution. The government subsequently sought to deport him from the United States, claiming that he had been convicted of an "aggravated felony." The Immigration Judge found that petitioner's conviction fell within the "aggravated felony" definition. The Board of Immigration Appeals agreed, as did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the Immigration Judge could inquire into the underlying facts of a prior fraud conviction for purposes of determining whether the loss to the victims exceeded $10,000. ^[1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 15, 2009. ^[1]

References

1. Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29 (2009).
2. Presson, Eliza (June 19, 2009). "Opinion Recap: Nijhawan v. Holder". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved September 25, 2025.

External links

• Text of Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29(2009) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .