One Hundred and Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India

Last updated
Constitution (One Hundred and Fifth Amendment) Act, 2021
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
Territorial extentIndia
Passed byLok Sabha
Passed10 August 2021
Passed byRajya Sabha
Passed11 August 2021
Assented to18 August 2021
Effective 15 August 2021
Legislative history
First chamber: Lok Sabha
Bill titleTHE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT) BILL, 2021
Bill citationBill No. 124 of 2021
Introduced byMinister of Social Justice and Empowerment, Dr. Virendra Kumar
Summary
Restores the power of State governments to recognise socially and educationally backward classes.
Keywords
Reservation, Socially and Educationally Backward Classes, Other Backward Classes, Federalism
Status: In force

The One Hundred and Fifth Amendment (or 105th Constitutional Amendment) to the Constitution of India- officially known as The Constitution (One Hundred and Fifth Amendment) Act, 2021- restored the power of State governments to recognise socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs). SEBCs, which includes the groups commonly known as Other Backward Classes (OBCs), are communities for which the State can provide 'special provisions' or affirmative action in India.

Contents

In May 2021, the Supreme Court held that the 102nd Constitutional Amendment, 2018 had taken away the State governments' powers to recognise SEBCs. [1] This power had been exercised by States for decades, and regional and national parties almost unanimously demanded an amendment to restore the power. In August 2021, over just 3 days, the Bill was introduced and passed by both Houses of Parliament. [2] The 105th Constitutional Amendment Act received Presidential Assent on 18 August.

Background

For decades, State governments in India have recognised socially and educationally backward classes, providing them with reservations in education and public employment. For example, Shahuji, a Maratha king provided reservations for Dalits and backward classes in July 1902. [3] Tamil Nadu had provided reservations as early as 1947. [4] In 1992, the Union government introduced its own separate scheme for SEBCs recognised in a Central List, acting on the basis of the Mandal Commission.

The Supreme Court held that both the Union and the State governments had the power to recognise SEBCs and provide them with reservations in its landmark 1992 decision, Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India . This could be done through separate State Lists and a Central List, which would apply for the benefits under the State or Union government respectively. In the same decision, the Court also held that before recognising a community as an SEBC and providing any affirmative action, the government must conduct an exercise to evaluate whether they are backward. This was to be done through Backward Classes Commissions both at the State and National level. In 1993, Parliament set up the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) as a statutory authority for this purpose. [5] Since then State governments have also had their own Backward Classes Commissions in order to evaluate backwardness and affirmative action policies.

Since 1992, the demand for greater protections for backward classes grew. In 2018, Parliament passed the 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act. The Amendment made the NCBC a constitutional authority, which had to be consulted on any policy matters regarding SEBCs, including recognition of communities. It also introduced an Article that gave the power to recognise SEBCs to the President of India who would notify a Central List of SEBCs. This List could only be amended by the Parliament. This procedure was similar to the ones in place for recognising Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

When the Act was being considered by Parliament, members of the Opposition raised concerns about whether this meant that State Lists of SEBCs would no longer be valid. The Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment clarified that this was not the intention. The Amendment would only change how the Union recognised SEBCs and State Lists would continue. [6] Most political parties almost unanimously wanted to retain State powers. The Amendment was passed following this clarification. [2]

The Maratha Reservations Case

In May 2021, the Supreme Court pronounced its judgment in Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v Chief Minister, Maharashtra. [1] In November 2018, the Maharashtra state legislature passed a law to recognise Marathas as an SEBC and provide them with reservations in public employment and higher education. The law was challenged, among other reasons, on the basis that the state did not have the power to recognise SEBCs after the 102nd Constitutional Amendment.

By a 3:2 majority, the Court agreed and struck down the law. According to the majority, the text of the Constitution is the primary source for interpreting it. So, even though parliamentary records indicated that there was no intention to take away the States' power to recognise SEBCs, the literal interpretation of the amended Constitution was that only the Union government had this power. [7]

The judgment surprised the political community. Multiple state and national parties wanted States' powers to be restored. The Union government immediately asked the Court to review its decision, as this might result in many communities losing their SEBC status. [8] However, on June 28, the Court passed an order dismissing the review petition. [9] Following this, the Union government introduced the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill in August, which would later become the 105th Constitutional Amendment Act.

Legislative History

On 9 August 2021, the Minister for Social Justice and Empowerment, Dr. Virendra Kumar, introduced The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Amendment) Bill, 2021 in the Lok Sabha. [10] The Objects and Reasons of the Bill states that it is being introduced to "adequately clarify that the State Government and Union territories are empowered to prepare and maintain their own State List/Union territory List of SEBCs". It also states that the "legislative intent at the time of passing of the Constitution (One Hundred and Second Amendment) Act, 2018 was that it deals with the Central List of the socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs). It recognises the fact that even prior to the declaration of the Central List of SEBCs in 1993, many States/Union territories are having their own State List/Union territory List of OBCs." [11]

The Bill was debated over the course of 10 August 2021. All Members of Parliament spoke in support of the Bill, using the opportunity to discuss various policies regarding SEBCs or OBCs. Many opposition parties particularly focused on demanding a Caste Census along with the 2022 Census of India. Some members sought an amendment that also removed the 50% limit on reservations that was reiterated in the Maratha Reservation Case. On the same day, the Bill was passed unanimously with 380 votes in favour and 0 against. [12]

The Bill was then introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 11 August 2021. It was debated and passed on the same day, once again with unanimous support. [13]

On 18 August 2021, the President gave his assent to the Bill, making it a law passed as the 105th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2021. The Act was published in the Gazette of India on 19 August 2021. [14] On 15 September 2021, the Ministry of Law and Justice issued a notification which stated that the 105th Constitutional Amendment would be deemed to be in force from 15 August 2021. [15]

Provisions

The Amendment added that SEBC will be defined for the purposes of the Central Government or the State or Union Territory as the case may be. Particularly, it added a clause stating that every State or Union Territory may have its own list of SEBCs which can be different from the Central List for its own purposes. It also stated that the National Commission for Backward Classes powers and responsibilities (including the requirement to be consulted on all policy matters and recognition of SEBCs) did not apply to the separate State lists. Effectively, this would mean that States do not need to consult the National Commission. [16]

Judicial Consideration

In February 2021, the Tamil Nadu state legislature introduced a law that sought to provide reservations for the Vanniyar community as a sub-classification within SEBCs. This was challenged on the basis that since it was passed before the 105th Constitutional Amendment Act, the state did not have the power to pass the law at the time. The state argued that the 105th Amendment was only clarifying the 102nd Amendment, and so it had retrospective effect. [17] The Supreme Court disagreed, an amendment would not be considered retrospective unless it explicitly said so. The text of the 105th Amendment has no indication that it is retrospective. However, the Vanniyar reservation law only changed the quantum and classification of the community that was already recognised as an SEBC in 1994. So, it was not exercising a power of recognising SEBCs. States continued to hold the power to decide the quantum and nature of reservation. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lok Sabha</span> Lower house of the Parliament of India

The Lok Sabha, constitutionally the House of the People, is the lower house of India's bicameral Parliament, with the upper house being the Rajya Sabha. Members of the Lok Sabha are elected by an adult universal suffrage and a first-past-the-post system to represent their respective constituencies, and they hold their seats for five years or until the body is dissolved by the President on the advice of the council of ministers. The house meets in the Lok Sabha Chambers of the Parliament House, New Delhi.

The Other Backward Class (OBC) is a collective term used by the Government of India to classify castes which are educationally or socially backward. It is one of several official classifications of the population of India, along with general castes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SCs and STs). The OBCs were found to comprise 52% of the country's population by the Mandal Commission report of 1980, and were determined to be 41% in 2006 when the National Sample Survey Organisation took place. There is substantial debate over the exact number of OBCs in India; it is generally estimated to be sizable, but many believe that it is higher than the figures quoted by either the Mandal Commission or the National Sample Survey.

In the Westminster system, a money bill or supply bill is a bill that solely concerns taxation or government spending, as opposed to changes in public law.

This is a brief description of the lawmaking procedure in India.

Reservation is a system of affirmative action in India that provides historically disadvantaged groups representation in education, employment, government schemes, scholarships and politics. Based on provisions in the Indian Constitution, it allows the Union Government and the States and Territories of India to set reserved quotas or seats, at particular percentage in Education Admissions, Employments, Political Bodies, Promotions, etc, for "socially and educationally backward citizens."

Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India is an Indian public interest litigation case challenging the conclusion of the Mandal Commission that about 52% of the total population of India belonged to Other Backward Classes classification. The National Sample Survey Organisation had estimated the OBC segment to be 42 per cent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forty-second Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> Amendment to the Indian Constitution

The 42nd amendment, officially known as The Constitution Act, 1976, was enacted during the Emergency by the Indian National Congress government headed by Indira Gandhi.

In India, a number of political positions and university posts are held for specific groups of the population, including Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and women in some cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> Permits eminent domain

The Twenty-fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution Act, 1971, curtailed the fundamental right to property, and permitted the acquisition of private property by the government for public use, on the payment of compensation which would be determined by the Parliament and not the courts. The amendment also exempted any law giving effect to the article 39(b) and (c) of Directive Principles of State Policy from judicial review, even if it violated the Fundamental Rights.

Amending the Constitution of India is the process of making changes to the nation's fundamental law or supreme law. The procedure of amendment in the constitution is laid down in Part XX of the Constitution of India. This procedure ensures the sanctity of the Constitution of India and keeps a check on arbitrary power of the Parliament of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's Reservation Bill (2010)</span> Proposes to reserve a minimum of 33% seats for women in Parliament (2010)

The Women's Reservation Bill or The Constitution Bill, 9th March, 2010, is a bill passed in the Parliament of India which says to amend the Constitution of India to reserve 1/3 of all seats in the lower house of Parliament of India, the Lok Sabha, and in all state legislative assemblies for women. The seats were proposed to be reserved in rotation and would have been determined by draw of lots in such a way that a seat would be reserved only once in three consecutive general elections.

The National Commission for Backward Classes is an Indian constitutional body under the jurisdiction of Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India established through Constitution Act, 2018 this amendment act in the constitution to make it a constitutional body under Article 338B of the Indian Constitution. It was constituted pursuant to the provisions of the National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993.

The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act of 2014, commonly known as the Telangana Act, is an Act of Indian Parliament that split the state of Andhra Pradesh into Telangana and the residuary Andhra Pradesh state, as an outcome of the Telangana movement. The Act defined the boundaries of the two states, determined how the assets and liabilities were to be divided, and laid out the status of Hyderabad as the permanent capital of new Telangana state and temporary capital of the Andhra Pradesh state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> Constitutional amendment

The Twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as The Constitution Act, 1971, enables Parliament to dilute Fundamental Rights through Amendments of the Constitution. It also amended article 368 to provide expressly that Parliament has power to amend any provision of the Constitution. The amendment further made it obligatory for the President to give his assent, when a Constitution Amendment Bill was presented to him.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha</span> Representative of the Indian people in the lower house of the Indian Parliament

A Member of Parliament in the Lok Sabha is the representative of a legislative constituency in the Lok Sabha; the lower house of the Parliament of India. Members of parliament of Lok Sabha are chosen by direct elections on the basis of the adult suffrage. The maximum permitted strength of members of parliament in the Lok Sabha is 550. This includes the maximum 530 members to represent the constituencies and states and up to 20 members to represent the union territories. Between 1952 and 2020, two seats were reserved for members of the Anglo-Indian community. The current elected strength of the Lok Sabha is 543. The party—or coalition of parties—having a majority in the Lok Sabha chooses the Prime Minister of India.

Economically Weaker Section (EWS) in India is a subcategory of people having an annual family income less than ₹8 lakh (US$10,000) and who do not belong to any category such as SC/ST/OBC across India, nor to MBC in Tamil Nadu. A candidate who does not fall under SC/ST/OBC and fulfils the EWS economic criteria are to be part of the EWS category.

Youth For Equality is an Indian organisation against caste-based policies and reservations, i.e. affirmative action. It was founded by students in a number of Indian universities in 2006. It organises demonstrations and legal challenges against caste-based policies.

The One Hundred and Third Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as the Constitution Act, 2019, introduces 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of society for admission to Central Government-run educational institutions and private educational institutions, and for employment in Central Government jobs. The Amendment does not make such reservations mandatory in State Government-run educational institutions or State Government jobs. However, some states have chosen to implement the 10% reservation for economically weaker sections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Second Amendment of the Constitution of India</span>

The One Hundred and Second Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as the Constitution Act, 2018, granted constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> Constitutional amendment of 2019

The One Hundred and Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India, extends the deadline for the cessation of the reservation of seats for members from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies by a period of 10 years.

References

  1. 1 2 "Maratha Reservation". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  2. 1 2 R, Mihir (24 August 2021). "Why Did Parliament Have to Pass the 105th Constitutional Amendment?". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  3. ↑ Siddharth (5 May 2018). "Shahu ji Maharaj: The saviour king of the Backwards and Dalits". Forward Press. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  4. ↑ State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan , AIR 1951 SC 226 (Supreme Court of India)
  5. ↑ The National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993
  6. ↑ Report of the Select Committee on the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Third Amendment) Bill, 2017 Rajya Sabha (19 July 2017).
  7. ↑ Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v Chief Minister, Maharashtra. 5 May 2021 (Supreme Court of India).
  8. ↑ Wadekar, Disha; Kisana, Ravikant (30 June 2021). "Missing the Mark". The Caravan. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  9. ↑ R, Mihir (2 July 2021). "Maratha Review Dismissed: What Next?". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  10. ↑ Lok Sabha Debates. Seventeenth Series, Vol. XIII No. 15 (9 August 2021). Available at Text of Debates, Lok Sabha.
  11. ↑ The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Amendment) Bill, 2021 Lok Sabha (9 August 2021).
  12. ↑ Lok Sabha Debates. Seventeenth Series, Vol. XIII No. 16 (10 August 2021). Available at Text of Debates, Lok Sabha.
  13. ↑ "The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Amendment) Bill, 2021". PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  14. ↑ The Gazette of India Extraordinary Issue No. 52 Part II - Section 1. CG-DL-E19082021-229155 (19 August 2021).
  15. ↑ Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment Notification S.O. 4020(E) (19 September 2021).
  16. ↑ The Constitution (One Hundred and Fifth Amendment) Act, 2021.
  17. ↑ "Tamil Nadu's Vanniyar Reservation". Supreme Court Observer. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  18. ↑ Pattali Makkal Katchi v Mayileruperumal, 31 March 2022 (Supreme Court of India)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.