One Hundred and Third Amendment of the Constitution of India

Last updated

The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
  • An Act further to amend the Constitution of India.
Citation 103rd Amendment Act of the Indian Constitution
Territorial extentIndia
Passed by Lok Sabha
Passed8 January 2019
Passed by Rajya Sabha
Passed9 January 2019
Assented to12 January 2019
Commenced14 January 2019
Legislative history
First chamber: Lok Sabha
Bill titleThe Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-fourth Amendment) Bill, 2019
Bill citation Bill No. 3 of 2019
Introduced by Thawar Chand Gehlot
Introduced8 January 2019
Status: In force

The One Hundred and Third Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019, introduces 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of society for admission to Central Government-run educational institutions and private educational institutions (except for minority educational institutions), and for employment in Central Government jobs. [1] The Amendment does not make such reservations mandatory in State Government-run educational institutions or State Government jobs. However, some states have chosen to implement the 10% reservation for economically weaker sections. [2]

Contents

Currently, the quota can be availed by persons with an annual gross household income of up to ₹8 lakh (US$10,000). Families that own over 5 acres of agricultural land, a house over 1,000 square feet, a plot of over 100-yards in a notified municipal area or over a 200-yards plot in a non-notified municipal area cannot avail the reservation. [3] Persons belonging to communities that already have reservations such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and the "non creamy layer" of Other Backward Classes are also not eligible for reservation under this quota(creamy layer of OBC crosses 8 lakh limit). [4]

Legislative history

The bill of Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on 8 January 2019 as the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-fourth Amendment) Bill, 2019. It was introduced by Thawar Chand Gehlot, Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment. The bill sought to amend Articles 15 and 16 of the constitution. [5]

The bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on 9 January 2019, the last day of the House's winter session. The bill received overwhelming support from the 326 members present with 323 votes in favour and only 3 members voting against. [6] Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the passage of the bill a "landmark moment in our nation's history". [7]

The Bill was tabled in the Rajya Sabha the following day. The House rejected 5 amendments proposed by members of the Opposition. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) MP Kanimozhi moved a motion, supported by Left parties, to refer the Bill to a parliamentary select committee. The motion was rejected receiving 18 votes in favour, 155 against, and one abstention. The Bill, as passed by the Lok Sabha, was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 10 January 2019 with 165 votes in favour and 7 against. [8] [9]

The Bill received assent from President Ram Nath Kovind on 12 January 2019. It was notified in The Gazette of India on the same date. [10] The 103rd Amendment came into effect on 14 January 2019. [11]

Constitutional challenge

Within hours of the bill passing the Rajya Sabha, non-governmental organization Youth For Equality filed a PIL challenging the Bill in the Supreme Court. The NGO argues that the Bill violates the basic structure of the Constitution which they claim does not permit reservation based on economic factors. They also argue that a previous Supreme Court judgement had fixed the maximum reservation allowed under all quotas at 50%. [12] The 103rd Amendment raises the total reservation quota to 59.5%.[ citation needed ] The DMK filed a motion in the Madras High Court challenging the Amendment on 18 January 2019. The party argues that reservations should be based on the community to which an individual belongs and not their economic status. [13]

On 8 February 2019, a Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi declined to pass a stay on the Amendment, but agreed to hear the petitions challenging the Amendment. [14] [3]

Attorney-General K. K. Venugopal defended the government's position before a three judge bench of the Supreme Court on 31 July 2019 arguing that the 103rd Amendment was "necessitated to benefit the economically weaker sections of the society who were not covered within the existing schemes of reservation, which as per statistics, constituted a considerably large segment of the Indian population." Venugopal noted that Article 46 of the Directive Principles of State Policy commands the State to promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the population and protect them from social injustice. The Attorney-General also added, "In the country’s higher educational system, private unaided institutions play an important role providing education to over 1.34 crore students in various programmes. It is therefore essential that the socially and economically weaker section gets access to these facilities as mandated in the Constitution." The bench led by Justice S.A. Bobde declared that the Court would reserve its orders and decide whether to refer the matter to a Constitution Bench. The Court declined to pass a stay order and the 103rd Amendment remains in effect. [15] In August 2020, the case was referred to five-judge Constitution Bench for hearing. [16]

Implementation

Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani announced that Gujarat would implement the 10% reservation policy beginning 14 January 2019, becoming the first state to implement the law. [17] Telangana Chief Secretary S.K. Joshi said on 14 January that the state would also implement the Amendment, but would consider making some changes that differ with the Amendment. [2]

Supreme Court verdict

On 7 November 2022, Supreme Court of India by a 3:2 verdict in Janhit Abhiyan vs Union Of India Writ Petition (Civil) No(S). 55 OF 2019, upheld the validity of the 103rd constitutional amendment carried out to provide legal sanction carve out 10% reservation for the economically weaker sections from unreserved classes for admission in educational institutions and government jobs [18] and held that the 50% cap on quota is not inviolable and affirmative action on economic basis may go a long way in eradicating caste-based reservation. [19] [20] This constitutional amendment pushed the total reservation to 59.50% in central institutions.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arjun Singh (Madhya Pradesh politician)</span> 12th Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, India

Arjun Singh was an Indian politician from the Indian National Congress, who served twice as the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh in the 1980s. He also served twice as the Union Minister of Human Resource Development, in the Manmohan Singh and P. V. Narasimha Rao ministries.

The Other Backward Class (OBC) is a collective term used by the Government of India to classify castes that are educationally or socially backward. It is one of several official classifications of the population of India, along with general castes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SCs and STs). The OBCs were found to comprise 52% of the country's population by the Mandal Commission report of 1980 and were determined to be 41% in 2006 when the National Sample Survey Organisation took place. There is substantial debate over the exact number of OBCs in India; it is generally estimated to be sizable, but many believe that it is higher than the figures quoted by either the Mandal Commission or the National Sample Survey.

Reservation is a system of affirmative action in India created during the British rule. It provides historically disadvantaged groups representation in education, employment, government schemes, scholarships and politics. Based on provisions in the Indian Constitution, it allows the Union Government and the States and Territories of India to set reserved quotas or seats, at particular percentage in Education Admissions, Employments, Political Bodies, Promotions, etc., for "socially and educationally backward citizens."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Indian anti-reservation protests</span> Protest in India against reservation for OBCs

The 2006 Indian anti-reservation protests were a series of protests that took place in India in 2006 in opposition to the decision of the Union Government of India, led by the Indian National Congress-headed multiparty coalition United Progressive Alliance, to implement reservations for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in central and private institutes of higher education. These protests were one of the two major protests against the Indian reservation system, the other one being the 1990 anti-Mandal protests.

Forward caste is a term used in India to denote castes which are not listed in SC, ST or OBC reservation lists. They are on average considered ahead of other castes economically and educationally. They account for about 30.8% of the population based on Schedule 10 of available data from the National Sample Survey Organisation 55th (1999–2000) and National Sample Survey Organisation 61st Rounds (2004–05) Round Survey.

In India, a number of political positions and university posts are held for specific groups of the population, including Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and women in some cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's Reservation Bill, 2010</span> Constitutional amendment of India

The Women's Reservation Bill or The Constitution Bill, 9 March 2010, is a bill passed in the Parliament of India which says to amend the Constitution of India to reserve 1/3 of all seats in the lower house of Parliament of India, the Lok Sabha, and in all state legislative assemblies for women. The seats were proposed to be reserved in rotation and would have been determined by draw of lots in such a way that a seat would be reserved only once in three consecutive general elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rajendra Agrawal</span> Indian politician

Rajendra Agrawal is an Indian politician and a member of the 17th Lok Sabha of India. He represents the Meerut of Uttar Pradesh and is a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dinesh Maheshwari</span> Indian judge (born 1958)

Dinesh Maheshwari is a former Judge of the Supreme Court of India. He is a former Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court & High Court of Meghalaya. He took the oath as a Judge of Rajasthan High Court on 2 September 2004. He was transferred to the Allahabad High Court and remained senior Judge at the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court from 2 March 2015. He took oath as Chief Justice of the High Court of Meghalaya on 24 February 2016. On transfer to Karnataka, Justice Maheshwari took oath as 30th Chief Justice of High Court of Karnataka on 12 February 2018. He took oath as Judge of the Supreme Court of India on 18 January 2019.

Economically Weaker Section (EWS) in India is a subcategory of people having an annual family income less than ₹8 lakh (US$10,000) and who do not belong to any category such as SC/ST/OBC across India, nor to MBC in Tamil Nadu. A candidate who does not fall under SC/ST/OBC and fulfils the EWS economic criteria are to be part of the EWS category.

Between 1952 and 2020, two seats were reserved in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Parliament of India, for members of the Anglo-Indian community. These two members were nominated by the President of India on the advice of the Government of India. In January 2020, the Anglo-Indian reserved seats in the Parliament and State Legislatures of India were discontinued by the 126th Constitutional Amendment Bill of 2019, when enacted as the 104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019.

Youth For Equality is an Indian organisation against caste-based policies and reservations, i.e. affirmative action. It was founded by students in a number of Indian universities in 2006. It organises demonstrations and legal challenges against caste-based policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Second Amendment of the Constitution of India</span>

The One Hundred and Second Amendment of the Constitution of India, officially known as the Constitution Act, 2018, granted constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> Constitutional amendment of 2019

The One Hundred and Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of India, extends the deadline for the cessation of the reservation of seats for members from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies by a period of 10 years.

Article 15 of the Constitution of India forbids discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste, gender, or place of birth or any of them. It applies Article 14's general principle of equality in specific situations by forbidding classifications made on protected grounds. While prohibiting discrimination based on prejudice, the Article is also the central issue in a large body of judicial decisions, public debate, and legislation revolving around affirmative action, reservations, and quotas. As of the 103rd Amendment of the Constitution of India, Article 15.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> Amendment of 2021

The One Hundred and Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of India- officially known as The Constitution Act, 2021- restored the power of State governments to recognise socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs). SEBCs, which includes the groups commonly known as Other Backward Classes (OBCs), are communities for which the State can provide 'special provisions' or affirmative action in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">J. B. Pardiwala</span> Indian judge (born 1965)

Jamshed Burjor Pardiwala is a judge of the Supreme Court of India since May 2022. He is a former judge of the Gujarat High Court.

Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India , also known as the EWS Reservation case, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One Hundred and Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of India</span> 2023 constitutional amendment of India

The Constitution Act, popularly known as the Women's Reservation Bill, 2023, was introduced in Lok Sabha on 19 September 2023 during the special session of Parliament. This legislation seeks to allocate 33 percent of the seats in the directly elected Lok Sabha, State legislative assemblies and Delhi legislative assembly for women.

Reservation policy in Bihar is a system of affirmative action that provides historically disadvantaged groups representation in education and employment. Reservations in the state rose from 60 percent in 2021 to 75 percent in 2023.

References

  1. ↑ "ET Explains: What is Constitution (One Hundred And Twenty-Fourth Amendment) Bill, 2019?". The Economic Times. 9 January 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  2. 1 2 "After Gujarat, Telangana set to implement 10% quota for upper castes". The Times of India. 15 January 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
  3. 1 2 "Should 10% quota matter be referred to Constitution Bench? SC to decide on March 28". The Indian Express. 11 March 2019. Retrieved 11 March 2019.
  4. ↑ Parthasarathy, Suhrith (16 July 2019). "A test of law and justice". The Hindu. Retrieved 13 September 2019.
  5. ↑ "The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty Fourth Amendment) Bill, 2019". PRS Legislative. 8 January 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  6. ↑ Varma, Gyan (8 January 2019). "Quota bill passed in Lok Sabha with near unanimous vote". Livemint. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  7. ↑ "Narendra Modi hails passage of quota bill in Lok Sabha". Livemint. 9 January 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  8. ↑ "Centre's 10% Quota For Economically Weak From General Category Passes Rajya Sabha Test". News18. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  9. ↑ "Rajya Sabha approves 10% reservation for poor in general category". Moneycontrol. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  10. ↑ "President of India gives assent to The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) ACT, 2019". Press Information Bureau. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  11. ↑ "NOTIFICATION" (PDF). egazette.nic.in. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
  12. ↑ "Bill for 10% reservation for poor in general category challenged in SC". The Times of India. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  13. ↑ Vaitheesvaran, Bharani (18 January 2019). "DMK moves Madras High Court against reservation amendment". The Economic Times. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  14. ↑ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (8 February 2019). "10% reservation quota: SC refuses immediate stay on Act". The Hindu. Retrieved 13 September 2019.
  15. ↑ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (31 July 2019). "SC reserves order on sending 10% quota challenge to Constitution Bench". The Hindu. Retrieved 13 September 2019.
  16. ↑ "EWS quota law: what a five-judge Constitution Bench will look into". The Indian Express. 7 August 2020. Retrieved 3 August 2021.
  17. ↑ "Gujarat set to become first state to implement new 10% quota law". Zee News. 13 January 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
  18. ↑ "Quotas for poor among 'forward castes' upheld: Here's the case and what the SC has ruled".
  19. ↑ "Supreme Court upholds EWS quota in 3-2 split verdict, CJI in minority". The Times of India .
  20. ↑ "Reservation policy cannot stay for indefinite period, says Supreme Court". The Hindu .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.