Ordinum Hollandiae ac Westfrisiae pietas

Last updated

Ordinum Hollandiae ac Westfrisiae pietas (The Piety of the States of Holland and Westfriesland) is a 1613 book on church polity by Hugo Grotius. It was the first publication of Grotius, a prominent jurist and Remonstrant, concerned with the Calvinist-Arminian debate and its ramifications, a major factor in the politics of the Netherlands in the 1610s. The Ordinum pietas, as it is known for short, gave a commentary on the Five Articles of Remonstrance of 1610 that were the legacy of the theological views of Jacobus Arminius, who died in 1609. [1]

Contents

Background

In arguing for a relaxation of orthodox Calvinism, or from another perspective against the hardening of Reformed theology along the lines proposed by his colleague and opponent Franciscus Gomarus, Arminius had appealed to the secular authorities. As a tactical move this appeal had brought advantages; but in the following years the Remonstrants, as the followers of Arminianism became called, had to face great resistance both to their views and to their approach to settling a dispute within the Dutch Reformed Church that was theological by recourse to the civil powers.

Grotius held a prominent legal office, being Advocate General to the States of Holland and Zealand. In the period from the Hague Conference of 1611 between Remonstrants and their opponents the Contra-Remonstrants, the views of Grotius were not widely known. It was with the publication of the Ordinum Pietas that he came off the fence, and became identified with the Remonstrant cause. [2] The consequences on a personal level for the author were serious: six years later he was under a death sentence, after the religious conflict became a matter of high politics.

Composition of the work

Grotius visited England for two months in the spring of 1613, taken there by legal issues centred on Dutch and British trading in the East Indies. He moved in the highest circles, meeting both James I of England, and George Abbot the Archbishop of Canterbury. [3] He began the composition of the Ordinum Pietas after his return, making use of Calvinist theological reading which he had spent time on after the Conference. Particularly useful to the debate and relevant for citation were John Calvin, Pierre Du Moulin, David Paraeus, William Perkins, Johannes Piscator, and William Whitaker. [2]

In writing this book, Grotius was self-consciously taking a position in the affair of Conrad Vorstius. That was because it took aim at a work of Sibrandus Lubbertus from 1611, Commentarii ad nonaginta novem errores Conradi Vorstii from 1611, the year in which Vorstius, an Arminian, had been forced out of the University of Leiden. More particularly it was directed against the dedication Lubbertus had made to George Abbot, in which the States of Holland were criticised for their lenient handling of the Remonstrants, and their reluctance to call a synod. [4] In reply to a polemic, he also used a rough, even insulting polemical tone of opponents; Grotius later felt he should have shown more restraint in the book. [5]

Views

Grotius argued for the tradition of Erasmus of seeking concord, putting down a marker for eirenicism; he also poured scorn on the idea, a frequent proposal of the time and in the event the solution taken, of a synod to decide on the theological points. [6] These ideas he developed by citing the Church Fathers; if not by name, Grotius uses the consensus patrum as a yardstick. [7]

He brought up the third-century example of Firmilian, a saint, who had taken a soft line with Paul of Samosata, later adjudged a heretic (monarchianism). Grotius proposed an approach based on modestia (moderation), and a religious toleration not restricted to the holding of opinions privately (a restriction which had been cited in the debate from the Theodosian Code) given the existing tolerance in the Netherlands. He wanted to move the ground of the discussion from sharp definition of issues, onto the territory of procedure, and the coexistence of orthodoxy with other beliefs. [7]

In the second part of the work he argues from the early Protestant Reformation. Erasmus, who was indeed Dutch if a Catholic, had disagreed with Martin Luther on predestination, the most contentious issue in the debate. The Contra-Remonstrant view was an import, too. Calvin and Philipp Melanchthon had not completely agreed in their formulation of Protestant confessions; but orthodoxy could therefore allow co-existing views on predestination. [8]

Grotius argued, in the third part, for what came to be called Erastianism, giving the state power over church matters. The leading Remonstrant theologian Johannes Wtenbogaert had already done this in his Tractaet of 1610. [9] Grotius therefore gives arguments, for example that "human jurisprudence" and "divine jurisprudence" cannot be separated without loss. An example was close to hand in the recent history of the Flemish church, to support the disorder inherent in separate jurisdictions. [10]

Reception

There were numerous hostile responses to the Ordinum Pietas, the first being the Ad Scripti...Hugonis Grotii (1614) of Johannes Bogermann. From the Remonstrant side it was answered by Caspar Barlaeus, Johannes Arnoldi Corvinus, and Gerard Vossius. [11] Lubbertus also replied in 1614, with his carefully considered Responsio ad Pietatem Hugonis Grotii, from a team involving also Petrus Plancius, Festus Hommius and Matthew Slade. [12] Antonius Walaeus, a friendly Calvinist, had warned Grotius that his treatment of predestination would not be accepted by orthodox Calvinists; and so it proved, despite the reference to Johannes Anastasius Veluanus by way of pointing out the Dutch tradition of moderation on the topic. [13]

Jacques-August de Thou received a complimentary copy; but his reaction was to warn Grotius about the dangers of political involvement. [14]

Translations from the original Latin were into Dutch (Wtenbogaert) [15] and into French, by Samuel Naeranus. [16]

A reprint was published (dated 1613 also) which toned down some of the criticisms of Lubbertus, but it was too late for Grotius to regain his reputation as a potential unifier of the Dutch church. [17]

Grotius wrote extensively on related topics in the next years: these writings fall into three different classes:

In the third category fall the Meletius, begun in 1611, [2] and the De imperio summarum potestatum circa sacra, which was only published posthumously, in 1647. [18] The De imperio was completed about 1614, and then Grotius worked on a work against Socinianism, to clarify his opposition to Unitarian views. He sent it to Walaeus, an increasingly sceptical sounding board, and published it in 1617 as Defensio fidei Catholicae de satisfactione Christi adversus Faustus Socinum. [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arminianism</span> Protestant theological movement

Arminianism is a movement of Protestantism initiated in the early 17th century, based on the theological ideas of the Dutch Reformed theologian Jacobus Arminius and his historic supporters known as Remonstrants. Dutch Arminianism was originally articulated in the Remonstrance (1610), a theological statement submitted to the States General of the Netherlands. This expressed an attempt to moderate the doctrines of Calvinism related to its interpretation of predestination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugo Grotius</span> Dutch philosopher and jurist

Hugo Grotius, also known as Huig de Groot and Hugo de Groot, was a Dutch humanist, diplomat, lawyer, theologian, jurist, statesman, poet and playwright. A teenage prodigy, he was born in Delft and studied at Leiden University. He was imprisoned in Loevestein Castle for his involvement in the controversies over religious policy of the Dutch Republic, but escaped hidden in a chest of books that was transported to Gorinchem. Grotius wrote most of his major works in exile in France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synod of Dort</span> International Synod held in Dordrecht in 1618–1619, by the Dutch Reformed Church

The Synod of Dort was an international Synod held in Dordrecht in 1618–1619, by the Dutch Reformed Church, to settle a divisive controversy caused by the rise of Arminianism. The first meeting was on 13 November 1618 and the final meeting, the 180th, was on 29 May 1619. Voting representatives from eight foreign Reformed churches were also invited. Dort was a contemporary Dutch term for the town of Dordrecht.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacobus Arminius</span> Dutch theologian (1560–1609)

Jacobus Arminius, the Latinized name of Jakob Hermanszoon, was a Dutch Reformed minister and theologian during the Protestant Reformation period whose views became the basis of Arminianism and the Dutch Remonstrant movement. He served from 1603 as professor in theology at the University of Leiden and wrote many books and treatises on theology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Franciscus Gomarus</span> Dutch theologian (1563–1641)

Franciscus Gomarus was a Dutch theologian, a strict Calvinist and an opponent of the teaching of Jacobus Arminius, whose theological disputes were addressed at the Synod of Dort (1618–19).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simon Episcopius</span> Dutch theologian (1583–1643)

Simon Episcopius was a Dutch theologian and Remonstrant who played a significant role at the Synod of Dort in 1618. His name is the Latinized form of his Dutch name Simon Bisschop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Calvinist–Arminian debate</span> Christian theological debate

The history of the Calvinist–Arminian debate begins in early 17th century in the Netherlands with a Christian theological dispute between the followers of John Calvin and Jacobus Arminius, and continues today among some Protestants, particularly evangelicals. The debate centers around soteriology, or the study of salvation, and includes disputes about total depravity, predestination, and atonement. While the debate was given its Calvinist–Arminian form in the 17th century, issues central to the debate have been discussed in Christianity in some form since Augustine of Hippo's disputes with the Pelagians in the 5th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conrad Vorstius</span> Dutch theologian (1569–1622)

Conrad Vorstius was a German-Dutch heterodox Remonstrant theologian, and successor to Jacobus Arminius in the theology chair at Leiden University. His appointment, and the controversy surrounding it, became an international matter in the political and religious affairs of the United Provinces during the Twelve Years' Truce, supplying a pretext for the irregular intervention of King James I of England in those affairs. Vorstius published theological views which were taken to show sympathy with the Socinians, and was declared a heretic at the Synod of Dort in 1619.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johannes Wtenbogaert</span>

Johannes Wtenbogaert was a Dutch Protestant minister, a leader of the Remonstrants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicolaas Grevinckhoven</span>

Nicolaas Grevinckhoven was a Dutch Protestant minister, a combative proponent of the Remonstrant party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arminianism in the Church of England</span>

Arminianism was a controversial theological position within the Church of England particularly evident in the second quarter of the 17th century. A key element was the rejection of predestination. The Puritans fought against Arminianism, and King James I of England opposed it before, during, and after the Synod of Dort, 1618–1619, where the English delegates participated in formulating the Calvinist Canons of Dort, but his son Charles I, favored it, leading to deep political battles. The Methodists, who espoused a variant of the school of thought called Wesleyan–Arminian theology, branched off the Church of England in the 18th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sibrandus Lubbertus</span> Dutch Calvinist theologian

Sibrandus Lubbertus (c.1555–1625) was a Dutch Calvinist theologian and was a professor of theology at the University of Franeker for forty years from the institute's foundation in 1585. He was a prominent participant in the Synod of Dort (1618–1619). His primary works were to counter Roman Catholic doctrine and to oppose Socinianism and Arminianism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Petrus Bertius</span>

Petrus Bertius was a Flemish philosopher, theologian, historian, geographer and cartographer. Bertius published much in mathematics, and historical and theological works, but he is now best known as cartographer with his edition of the Geographia of Ptolemy, and for its atlas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antonius Thysius the Elder</span>

Antonius Thysius was a Dutch Reformed theologian, professor at the University of Harderwijk and University of Leiden.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antonius Walaeus</span> Dutch Calvinist minister, theologian, and academic

Antonius Walaeus was a Dutch Calvinist minister, theologian, and academic.

Samuel Naeranus (1582–1641) was a Dutch Remonstrant minister and Neo-Latin poet, exiled in 1619 after the Synod of Dort.

Johannes Arnoldi Corvinus born Joannes Arnoldsz Ravens was a Dutch Remonstrant minister and jurist.

Matthew Slade (1569–1628) was an English nonconformist minister and royal agent, in the Netherlands by 1600 and active there in the Contra-Remonstrant cause.

Johannes Narssius was a Dutch physician and Neo-Latin poet, initially a Remonstrant minister.

<i>Alma Academia Leidensis</i>

Alma Academia Leidensis refers to an illustrated book about the professors of the University of Leiden, the Netherlands.

References

Notes

  1. ↑ Rabbie, p. 8; Google Books.
  2. 1 2 3 Guillaume Henri Marie Posthumus Meyjes, Meletius, sive, De iis quae inter Christianos conveniunt epistola (1988), pp.13–4; Google Books.
  3. ↑ W. B. Patterson, King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom (2000), pp. 144–5.
  4. ↑ Rabbie, p. 37; Google Books.
  5. ↑ Grotius, p. 5; Google Books.
  6. ↑ Guillaume Henri Marie Posthumus Meyjes, Henk J. M. Nellen, Edwin Rabbie, Hugo Grotius, theologian: essays in honour of G. H. M. Posthumus Meyjes (1994), p. 84; Google Books.
  7. 1 2 Hans W. Blom, Property, Piracy and Punishment: Hugo Grotius on war and booty in De iure praedae: concepts and contexts (2009), pp. 130–2; Google Books.
  8. ↑ Martin Mulsow, Jan Rohls, Socinianism and Arminianism: Antitrinitarians, Calvinists, and cultural exchange in seventeenth-century Europe (2005), p. 116; Google Books.
  9. ↑ Grotius, p. 13; Google Books.
  10. ↑ Christoph A. Stumpf, The Grotian Theology of International Law: Hugo Grotius and the moral foundations of international relations, pp. 131–2; Google Books.
  11. ↑ Grotius, p. 128; Google Books.
  12. ↑ Willem Nijenhuis, Matthew Slade, 1569-1628: letters to the English ambassador (1986), p. 16; Google Books.
  13. ↑ Rabbie, p. 10; Google Books.
  14. ↑ Rhoda Schnur, Ann Moss, (editors), Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Hafniensis: proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of neo-Latin studies: Copenhagen, 12 August to 17 August 1991 (1994), p. 237; archive.org.
  15. ↑ Wiep van Bunge, From Stevin to Spinoza: an essay on philosophy in the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic (2001), p. 23;Google Books.
  16. ↑ Rabbie, p. 44; Google Books.
  17. ↑ Rabbie dbnl .
  18. ↑ Grotius, p. 1; Google Books.
  19. ↑ Richard Tuck, Philosophy and Government 1572–1651 (1993), p. 190.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.