Outrage industrial complex

Last updated

The Outrage Industrial Complex (OIC) is a combination of forces including media outlets, social media influencers, political fundraising messaging, and individuals in media, political leadership or advocacy that in the late 20th and early 21st centuries exploited differences of opinion and what was termed a culture of contempt drawn along political and social lines, increasing distrust of institutions and society, to advance their own desires for fame, wealth, higher office, or for geopolitical reasons.

Contents

The OIC creates and distributes outrage media, digital or print content specifically intended to provoke anger or outrage among its consumers to increase engagement.

Makeup

The complex includes media outlets, social media influencers, political fundraising messaging, and individuals in media, political leadership or advocacy who call out "outrages", hoping to generate what Richard Thompson Ford, writing for The American Interest , calls a sense of "righteous indignation" and rage borne of frustration in their readers or listeners, often for their own purposes of attracting advertisers or fame or to intentionally cause social disruption in a country or region. [1] [2] [3]

History

Rockefeller Brothers CEO Stephen B. Heintz said that the issue has been "fifty years in the making" [3] while Craig Keaton of Texas Christian University said that "researchers, thinkers, writers, and advocates" began "warning about" the OIC in the late 2010s. [4]

Ford notes that the generation of outrage for one's own purposes is not a new concept, but had moved from "the cliched angry young man" into the general population, regardless of age or social class. [1] He argued in 2019 that the sense of "comfortable complacency" being inherently evil and of outrage being a means to achieve positive change could be traced back to Friedrich Nietzsche, Aldous Huxley, and Lewis Mumford. [1]

A theory of political physics, sometimes called the physics of politics, uses a rough formula to describe the phenomenon: Pi = (Ci + O)L, or perceived importance is equal to the sum of cosmic importance + outrage expressed multiplied by the loudness of the expressed outrage. [5] [6]

Strategy and mechanics

According to the Dallas News , the strategy of the outrage industrial complex is to exploit the human evolutionary tendency toward distrust of outgroups. [7] According to Peter T. Coleman, writing for Yes! magazine, "experiencing a perceived wrong or injustice — especially to one’s in-group — activates the same reward and habit regions of the brain (the nucleus accumbens and dorsal striatum) as substance addiction, triggering cravings in anticipation of experiencing pleasure and relief through retaliation". [8] Tim Shriver agreed that the mechanics mirrored those of addiction, calling it "the business model". [9]

Arthur C. Brooks agrees that the cycle resembles addiction, writing in the New York Times in 2019 that the OIC creates "a species of addiction by feeding our desire to believe that we are completely right and that the other side is made up of knaves and fools. It strokes our own biases while affirming our worst assumptions about those who disagree with us." [10] Brooks also argues OIC exploits the motive attribution asymmetry, a psychological and sociological theory that humans in conflict tend to believe they are motivated by positive goals while the other side is motivated by negative goals. [11]

Ford notes the basic strategy is circular: "Dangle a few choice offensive comments about sensitive topics such as affirmative action, feminism, or sexual orientation, and wait for earnest undergraduates to rise to the bait and stage a noisy outraged demonstration, thus allowing the provocateurs to wrap themselves in the First Amendment and lament the outrageousness of the heckler’s veto". [1]

Arthur C. Brooks notes that a given media outlet tends to stake out a side on any given issue and exploit that side's fears and anxieties and promote a "culture of contempt" which assumes the worst of those on the opposite side of any issue. [10] According to Psychology Today, this culture of contempt creates "a feeling of moral superiority that fuels our fantasies of ‘owning,’ ‘trolling,’ ‘dunking on,’ and 'throwing shade’ at adversaries"; Brooks writes that this includes seeing those adversaries as "not just wrong, but in some ways worthless as people, or even bad, or evil". [12] [13] [14]

Fodder

According to Ford, fodder for outrage media includes any topic there is profound disagreement on, including "cultural insensitivity, the hordes of illegal immigrants pouring into our country, the assault on reproductive freedom, abortion-on-demand, hetero-normativity, transphobia, transgender bathrooms, neo-socialism, neo-fascism, liberal fascism, neoliberalism, micro-aggressions, liberal snowflakes, insensitivity to religious minorities, and the war on Christmas". [1] Outrage media uses commentary on such topics created specifically to provoke anger or outrage among its consumers. [15] It is characterized by insincere rage, umbrage and indignation without personal accountability or commitment. [16] [17] [18]

Motivation

According to media and advertising professional Dan Granger, writing in USA Today , measures of advertising effectiveness and engagement show "there’s a clear correlation between loud, polarizing content and successful ad performance" and that the "incentive structure [...] reward[s] attention gained by exploiting our differences". [19] David Axelrod notes that Marjorie Taylor Greene, a frequent creator of outrage media, is an extremely effective political fundraiser. [20] Brooks said that when someone allows themselves to be influenced by outrage media, "somebody else is profiting." [11] Tim Shriver of UNITE said "it works for those selling it. It is rewarded with clicks, votes and donations". [9] Media outlets are often incentivized to feign or foster outrage as it leads to increased page views, sharing, and comments, which are all lucrative online behaviors. [21]

Algorithms

Most social media business models depend on engagement as a revenue source. Facebook's algorithm, which rewards interaction and delivers content similar to that which spurred interaction, "privileges incendiary content", according to Luke Munn of the University of Queensland, writing in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences Communications . [22] YouTube's algorithm "[leads] users towards more extreme content"; both are termed by Munn "hate-inducing architectures". [22]

Importance

In 2019 Ford called outrage the "defining emotional state of our era". [1] Marc Ambinder, writing in The Atlantic in 2009, said it had become the "default emotion" in political strategy. [5]

Practitioners

Brooks estimates that the "5% fringes" on either side of the political spectrum represent those competing and cooperating with those on the other side of the spectrum in mutually benefitting from OIC [20]

Ford and others call out influencers expert at producing outrage. Brooks notes that a given practitioner, whether an individual, a group, or a media outlet, tends to stake out an ideological side on any given issue and exploit that side's fears and anxieties. [10]

Notable topics and incidents

Countering efforts

Coleman and others note multiple organizations that work to counter divisions caused by the OIC; by Coleman's estimate there are thousands. [8] [3]

The 2024 film Civil War explored a possible near future in which the United States was embroiled in a second civil war over political divisions. [29] It was cited by Steven Olikara in an opinion piece about how it could spark conversation about the OIC [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sensationalism</span> Type of editorial tactic used in mass media

In journalism and mass media, sensationalism is a type of editorial tactic. Events and topics in news stories are selected and worded to excite the greatest number of readers and viewers. This style of news reporting encourages biased or emotionally loaded impressions of events rather than neutrality, and may cause a manipulation to the truth of a story. Sensationalism may rely on reports about generally insignificant matters and portray them as a major influence on society, or biased presentations of newsworthy topics, in a trivial, or tabloid manner, contrary to general assumptions of professional journalistic standards.

Pornography addiction is the scientifically controversial application of an addiction model to the use of pornography. Pornography may be part of compulsive behavior with negative consequences to one's physical, mental, social, or financial well-being. While the World Health Organization's ICD-11 (2022) has recognized compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (CSBD) as an "impulsive control disorder", CSBD is not an addiction, and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5 (2013) and the DSM-5-TR (2022) do not classify compulsive pornography consumption as a mental disorder or a behavioral addiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marty Klein</span> American sex therapist

Marty Ralph Klein is an American sex therapist, author, educator and public policy analyst. Klein has spent his career supporting the healthy sexual expression of men, women and couples in a wide range of ways. He is critical of censorship, the concepts of sex addiction and porn addiction, as well as the anti-pornography movement. He believes that public policy relating to sexuality should be driven by scientific data rather than emotion, "tradition" or popular but untrue myths. He has been a participant in various state, federal and international court cases dealing with the First Amendment, obscenity, censorship and "harmful to minors" laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opposition to pornography</span> Overview of opposing views to pornography

Reasons for opposition to pornography include religious objections and feminist concerns, as well as alleged harmful effects, such as pornography addiction and erectile dysfunction. Pornography addiction is not a condition recognized by the DSM-5, the ICD-11, or the DSM-5-TR. Anti-pornography movements have allied disparate social activists in opposition to pornography, from social conservatives to harm reduction advocates. The definition of "pornography" varies between countries and movements, and many make distinctions between pornography, which they oppose, and erotica, which they consider acceptable. Sometimes opposition will deem certain forms of pornography more or less harmful, while others draw no such distinctions.

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), previously known as Morality in Media and Operation Yorkville, is an American conservative anti-pornography organization. The group has also campaigned against sex trafficking, same-sex marriage, sex shops and sex toys, decriminalization of sex work, comprehensive sex education, and various works of literature or visual arts the organization has deemed obscene, profane or indecent. Its current president is Patrick A. Trueman. The organization describes its goal as "exposing the links between all forms of sexual exploitation".

The industrial complex is a socioeconomic concept wherein businesses become entwined in social or political systems or institutions, creating or bolstering a profit economy from these systems. Such a complex is said to pursue its own interests regardless of, and often at the expense of, the best interests of society and individuals. Businesses within an industrial complex may have been created to advance a social or political goal, but mostly profit when the goal is not reached. The industrial complex may profit financially, or ideologically, from maintaining socially detrimental or inefficient systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography in India</span>

Pornography in India is restricted and illegal in all form including print media, electronic media, and digital media (OTT). Hosting, displaying, uploading, modifying, publishing, transmitting, storing, updating or sharing pornography is illegal in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shelley Lubben</span> Author, singer, motivational speaker, and former pornographic actress

Shelley Lubben was an American author, singer, motivational speaker, and pornographic actress. As a performer in the adult film industry, she was known professionally as Roxy. After she left the sex industry, Lubben became a born-again Christian and anti-pornography activist. From 2008 to 2016, she was the executive director of Pink Cross Foundation, which reached out to women and men in pornography and spoke in public forums about the hazardous working conditions that she experienced in the porn industry. In January 2016, Lubben closed Pink Cross Foundation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gabriella Coleman</span> Internet anthropologist

Enid Gabriella Coleman is an anthropologist, academic and author whose work focuses on politics and cultures of hacking and online activism, and has worked on distinct hacker communities, such as free and open-source software hackers, Anonymous and security hackers, among others. She holds the rank of full professor at Harvard University's Department of Anthropology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outrage (emotion)</span> Emotion characterized by a combination of surprise, disgust, and anger

Outrage is a strong moral emotion characterized by a combination of surprise, disgust, and anger, usually in reaction to a grave personal offense. It comes from old French "ultrage", which in turn borrows from classical Latin "ultra", meaning "beyond".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ruins photography</span> Sub-genre of photography

Ruins photography, sometimes called ruin porn, is a movement in photography that takes the decay of the built environment as its subject. While "ruins" may be broadly defined as the remnants of human achievement, "ruins photography" generally refers to the capture of urban decay in the post-industrial areas of the world. Ruins photography catalogues the abandonment and decline of cities most of all, and has sparked conversations about the role of art in various urban renewal, restoration, and conservation projects in cities throughout the globe.

Stop Porn Culture is an international feminist anti-porn organization with branches in the United States, Norway, and the United Kingdom. It works as an advisory body, trains trainers, and builds public health educational materials based on empirical research. It has a network of volunteers and activists and collaborates with other organizations in the U.S. and Europe. Some of its work is grassroots activist work.

Mia Khalifa is a Lebanese-American media personality and former pornographic film actress and webcam model. Born and raised in Lebanon, she and her family relocated to the United States in 2001. Her career in pornographic films lasted approximately three months beginning in October 2014, and she soon became the most-viewed performer on Pornhub. Her career choice was met with controversy after the release of a video in which she performed in a threesome while wearing a hijab; the scene brought Khalifa instant popularity as well as criticism from writers and religious figures. In 2015, Khalifa was voted the "Number 1 Porn Star" on Pornhub. In January 2017, xHamster reported that she was the most-searched-for adult actress of 2016. In 2018, she became the most-searched-for actress on Pornhub.

NoFap is a website and community forum that serves as a support group for those who wish to give up pornography and masturbation. Its name comes from the slang term fap, referring to male masturbation. While reasons for this abstinence vary by individual, the main motivation cited is attempting to overcome addiction to pornography, or other compulsive sexual behaviours. Other reasons for abstinence include religious and moral reasons, self-improvement, and physical beliefs that are not supported by medical science.

Outrage porn is any type of media or narrative designed to use outrage to provoke strong emotional reactions for the purpose of expanding audiences or increasing engagement. The term outrage porn was coined in 2009 by The New York Times political cartoonist and essayist Tim Kreider.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trumpism</span> American political movement

Trumpism is a political movement in the United States that comprises the political ideologies associated with Donald Trump and his political base. It incorporates ideologies such as right-wing populism, national conservatism, and neo-nationalism, and has been described as authoritarian and neo-fascist. Trumpist rhetoric heavily features anti-immigrant, xenophobic, nativist, and racist attacks against minority groups. Identified aspects include conspiracist, isolationist, Christian nationalist, evangelical Christian, protectionist, anti-feminist, and anti-LGBT beliefs. Trumpists and Trumpians are terms that refer to individuals exhibiting its characteristics.

The term white savior is a critical description of a white person who is depicted as liberating, rescuing or uplifting non-white people; it is critical in the sense that it describes a pattern in which people of color in economically under-developed nations that are majority non-white are denied agency and are seen as passive recipients of white benevolence. The role is considered a modern-day version of what is expressed in the poem The White Man's Burden (1899) by Rudyard Kipling. The term has been associated with Africa, and certain characters in film and television have been critiqued as white savior figures. Writer Teju Cole combined the term with "industrial complex" to coin "White Savior Industrial Complex".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Belle Delphine</span> British internet personality, pornographic actress, model and YouTuber (born 1999)

Mary-Belle Kirschner, better known as Belle Delphine, is a South African-born British media personality, pornographic actress, model, and YouTuber. Her social media accounts feature erotic and cosplay modelling, sometimes blending the two together. Her online persona began in 2018 through her cosplay modeling on Instagram. Her posts on the platform were often influenced by popular memes and trends.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fight the New Drug</span> American anti-pornography nonprofit organization

Fight the New Drug (FTND) is a nonprofit, secular, and non-legislative anti-pornography organization that is based in Utah. The group was founded in Utah in 2009. FTND describes pornography as analogous to a drug and argues that it is a public health crisis. It describes itself as asking people to "consider before consuming", rather than advocating anti-pornography legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Calendargate</span> 2023 controversy among US conservatives

The Calendargate controversy among American conservatives developed in December 2023 after the release of a 2024 calendar featuring photographs of female conservative activists and commentators, several of whom wore revealing clothing. Debates online among conservatives, including some of the women who had posed for the calendar, continued on social media websites into 2024.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ford, Richard Thompson (2019-12-20). "The Outrage-Industrial Complex". The American Interest . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  2. ↑ Coleman, Peter T. (4 March 2019). "Say No To Contempt". American Enterprise Institute .
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Weisman, Jonathan (2024-06-16). "Is the Partisan Divide Too Big to Be Bridged?". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  4. ↑ Keaton, Craig. "Essay: Contempt Is Contagious, So Is Love | Burnett School of Medicine at TCU | Fort Worth, Texas". Burnett School of Medicine . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  5. 1 2 Ambinder, Marc (2009-02-20). "The Outrage Industrial Complex". The Atlantic . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  6. ↑ Eggers, Andy (2009-10-28). "Physics of politics". Harvard University . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  7. ↑ "Reject the outrage industrial complex". Dallas News. 2024-03-23. Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  8. 1 2 Coleman, Peter T. (2021-11-06). "Outrage Industrial Complex: Research shows that polarized political discourse is actually addictive". Yes! . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  9. 1 2 3 4 "The power of dignity: Tim Shriver forges new path through the walls that divide us - @theU". University of Utah . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  10. 1 2 3 Brooks, Arthur C. (2019-03-02). "Opinion | Our Culture of Contempt". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  11. 1 2 "Arthur Brooks on why we hate our political enemies -- and how to stop". PBS NewsHour . 2019-07-04. Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  12. ↑ Stone, Jett (17 June 2022). "Contempt Fuels Culture War | Psychology Today". Psychology Today . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  13. 1 2 Kiniry, Mike; Glenn, Julie (11 March 2019). "Working to Overcome the 'Culture of Contempt'". WGCU . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  14. ↑ "Events Calendar | Wheelock College of Education & Human Development". Boston University . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  15. ↑ Patricia Roberts-Miller (2 April 2019). "Ocasio-Cortez Exploited as Clickbait and Outrage Porn Magnet". Washington Spectator . Archived from the original on May 29, 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2019. outrage porn, in which the participant takes pleasure in being outraged at the idiocy of 'them' (some out-group)
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Holiday, Ryan. "Outrage Porn: How the Need For 'Perpetual Indignation' Manufactures Phony Offense". New York Observer . Archived from the original on August 16, 2019. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  17. ↑ Leibovich, Mark (March 4, 2014). "Fake Outrage in Kentucky". New York Times . Archived from the original on October 2, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  18. ↑ Sauls, Scott (2016). Befriend: Create Belonging in an Age of Judgment, Isolation, and Fear. NavPress. pp. 44–45. ISBN   978-1496418333. New York Times writer Tim Kreider coined the term outrage porn to describe what he sees as our insatible search for things to be offended by
  19. 1 2 3 4 Granger, Dan (14 June 2021). "How the outrage industrial complex profits from stoking Americans' anger at each other". USA Today . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  20. 1 2 3 4 Axelrod, David (17 August 2023). "Arthur Brooks" (PDF). The Axe Files . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  21. ↑ Holiday, Ryan. "Rage Profiteers: How Bloggers Harness Our Anger For Their Own Gain". New York Observer . Archived from the original on September 22, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2015.
  22. 1 2 Munn, Luke (2020-07-30). "Angry by design: toxic communication and technical architectures". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications . 7 (1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-00550-7 . ISSN   2662-9992.
  23. ↑ Tomorrow, Tom (10 March 2021). "The outrage-industrial complex". Detroit Metro Times . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  24. 1 2 3 Waldman, Paul (2014-03-28). "Some Notes on the Outrage Industrial Complex". The American Prospect . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  25. 1 2 3 4 Daum, Meghan. "'Jezebel Effect' poisons conversations on gender and sexual violence". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on September 26, 2015. Retrieved September 13, 2015.
  26. 1 2 Dreher, Rod (2014-03-11). "'Outrage Porn': Manufacturing Indignation". The American Conservative . Retrieved 2024-06-23.
  27. ↑ Dennis, Steve T. (5 April 2021). "McConnell Criticizes 'Outrage-Industrial Complex' on Voting Laws". Bloomberg News . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  28. 1 2 Richie, Rob (2024-06-10). "Democracy isn't doomed". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2024-06-17.
  29. 1 2 Olikara, Steven (23 April 2024). "How Films Like 'Civil War' Can Spark Important Conversations and Help Defeat the 'Outrage Industrial Complex'". Variety .

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.