| Pachycynodon | |
|---|---|
| | |
| The mandible and teeth of Pachycynodon from Quercy, France | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Domain: | |
| Kingdom: | |
| Phylum: | |
| Class: | |
| Superorder: | |
| Order: | |
| Infraorder: | |
| Superfamily: | |
| Family: | |
| Genus: | Pachycynodon |
| Species: | See text |
Pachycynodon is a extinct genus of arctoid belonging to the family Amphicynodontidae. It lived in Europe during the late Oligocene epoch. [1] They were relatively small carnivores. They have deep mandibles that are robust, even more robust than that of genus Amphicynodon. Their muzzle is elongated. [2]
The genus is part of an extinct family of arctoids known as Amphicynodontidae. Genus Pachycyanodon contains several possible species and subspecies with the type species being Pachycynodon crassirostris. A list of species is found below and further info about some of them are found below that: [2] [3]
The type species of this genus, it was described by Schlosser in 1888 through a single isolated fourth metacarpal bone. It was found in the Quercy phosphorites but from an unknown locality. [3]
It was a large species, possibly one of the largest carnivoran from the Quercy phosphorites. Filhol described this species in 1876. [3]
The holotype of this species was uncovered in South Dakota in Porcupine creek in the lower Rosebud beds. The holotype specimen is a small lower jaw that is nearly identical to Pachycynodon tenuis only differing with the teeth of P. delicatus belong slightly longer. Pachycynodonharlowi is also nearly identical to both differing in the M2 and M3 molars being larger and a slightly shorter series of premolars. [2]
It was described in the year 1882 by Filhol. The species name "dubius" is from Filhol doubting that it belonged in genus Cynodictis based on its grouped trigonid of M1. [3]
It was also described by Schlosser in the year 1888 however there was no biostratigraphic locality given. [3]
It was described in the year 1915 by Teilhard. It is considered by Teilhard to be a model for the origin of this genus due to its small size. [3]