Persuasive writing

Last updated

Persuasive writing is a form of written arguments designed to convince, motivate, or sway readers toward a specific point of view or opinion on a given topic. This writing style relies on presenting reasoned opinions supported by evidence that substantiates the central thesis. [1] [2] Examples of persuasive writing include criticisms, reviews, reaction papers, editorials, proposals, advertisements, and brochures, all of which employ various persuasive techniques to influence readers.

Contents

In formal and academic contexts, persuasive writing often requires a comprehensive understanding of both sides of the argument—the position in favor and the opposing viewpoint. Acknowledging the counterargument is a strategy in this type of writing. By distinguishing and minimizing the significance of opposing perspectives, the writer enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of their argument. [1] [3]

When conducting research to support a thesis, anticipating potential objections or disagreements from critical readers is important. Including a counterargument within the writing allows the author to address these objections directly, explaining why they are less compelling or valid compared to the main argument. This approach not only strengthens the argument but also demonstrates a balanced and well-informed perspective. [2]

Structure

Effective persuasive writing requires a clear and organized structure to present arguments convincingly. Common components of this structure are:

  1. Introduction:
    • The introduction typically starts with a hook to grab the reader's attention, followed by background information to set the context. For instance, beginning with a surprising statistic can effectively engage the reader. [4]
    • The thesis statement, usually at the end of the introduction, should clearly articulate the writer's position on the topic. This statement serves as a roadmap for the reader, indicating what to expect in the following paragraphs. [3]
  2. Body Paragraphs:
    • Each body paragraph should focus on a single main idea that supports the thesis. Writers should start each paragraph with a topic sentence that outlines the paragraph's main point. [4] [3] For example, suppose the thesis is about the benefits of renewable energy. In that case, a topic sentence might state, "Investing in renewable energy sources not only reduces our carbon footprint but also creates jobs."
    • Supporting evidence is vital for strengthening the argument. This can include facts, statistics, examples, and expert opinions. For instance, referencing a study that shows the economic benefits of solar energy can provide solid backing for the argument. [5]
    • Addressing counterarguments has the ability to enhance the writer's credibility. This involves acknowledging opposing viewpoints and systematically refuting them. For example, if a counterargument states that renewable energy is too expensive, the writer could counter this by citing the declining costs of solar technology and its long-term savings. [3] Each counterargument can be presented in a separate paragraph or integrated within the main points to show a balanced perspective.
  3. Conclusion:
    • The conclusion summarizes the main arguments presented in the body paragraphs while reinforcing the thesis statement. It's important to restate the key points succinctly to remind the reader of the argument's strength. [4] [5] An example of a conclusion might reiterate, "The transition to renewable energy is not only necessary for environmental sustainability but also economically advantageous."
    • A strong conclusion may also include a call to action, urging the reader to take a specific step or consider the implications of the argument. For instance, encouraging readers to support local renewable energy initiatives can leave a lasting impact. [3] [5]

Elements

Persuasive writing comes in different forms depending on its purpose and audience. Each elements is used to achieve specific goals, like convincing someone to agree with an idea, take action, or buy something. Below are some common persuasive writing practices:

Reflexivity

Reflexivity involves critical self-reflection on the biases and preferences of researchers, which is essential for ensuring the substantive contribution of qualitative research. [6] It requires an awareness of the lenses through which we interpret the word, including our circumstances and positions, and an understanding of how these shape our findings and narratives. [7] That narrative serves as a method of inquiry and a means of understanding diverse realities, enhancing the depth of research findings. Engaging narratives that address power dynamics invite readers to grapple with complex issues, challenging their assumptions, and fostering social dialogue. [6]

Imagination

Imagination involves envisioning things without being constrained by how they exist or are perceived. It enables one to explore possibilities and adopt perspectives different from one's own. [8] This creativity allows researchers to explore unconventional angles and uncover insights from unexpected contexts. Imagination is crucial when research encounters obstacles, enabling scholars to adapt methodologies and foster environments for discoveries. However, tension exists between imaginative research and the conventions of academic writing, as researchers may hesitate to adopt unconventional narratives for fear of not conforming to established norms. [6]

Craftsmanship

Craftsmanship refers to the skill and artistry involved in integrating research. It encompasses the thoughtful selection of methods, careful construction, and ethical considerations in research practices. Effective craftsmanship emphasizes attention to detail and narrative structure, enhancing clarity and engagement. [6]

Authenticity

Authenticity provides readers with richer and more realistic contexts to apply knowledge and practice skills. [9] It is paramount in the investigation part to remain true to the voices and experiences of their participants. This commitment to authenticity resonates more with readers and offers genuine insights into social realities. The challenge lies in balancing rhetorical strategies with authentic representation. By prioritizing authenticity, researchers can encourage meaningful engagement and reflection around the issues addressed in their work. [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Essay</span> Written work often reflecting the authors personal point of view

An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have been sub-classified as formal and informal: formal essays are characterized by "serious purpose, dignity, logical organization, length," whereas the informal essay is characterized by "the personal element, humor, graceful style, rambling structure, unconventionality or novelty of theme," etc.

Non-fiction is any document or media content that attempts, in good faith, to convey information only about the real world, rather than being grounded in imagination. Non-fiction typically aims to present topics objectively based on historical, scientific, and empirical information. However, some non-fiction ranges into more subjective territory, including sincerely held opinions on real-world topics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Persuasion</span> Umbrella term of influence and mode of communication

Persuasion or persuasion arts is an umbrella term for influence. Persuasion can influence a person's beliefs, attitudes, intentions, motivations, or behaviours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fallacy</span> Argument that uses faulty reasoning

A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument that may appear to be well-reasoned if unnoticed. The term was introduced in the Western intellectual tradition by the Aristotelian De Sophisticis Elenchis.

Pathos appeals to the emotions and ideals of the audience and elicits feelings that already reside in them. Pathos is a term most often used in rhetoric, as well as in literature, film and other narrative art.

IRAC is an acronym that generally stands for: Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. It functions as a methodology for legal analysis. The IRAC format is mostly used in hypothetical questions in law school and bar exams.

"The Death of the Author" is a 1967 essay by the French literary critic and theorist Roland Barthes (1915–1980). Barthes' essay argues against traditional literary criticism's practice of relying on the intentions and biography of an author to definitively explain the "ultimate meaning" of a text. Instead, the essay emphasizes the primacy of each individual reader's interpretation of the work over any "definitive" meaning intended by the author, a process in which subtle or unnoticed characteristics may be drawn out for new insight. The essay's first English-language publication was in the American journal Aspen, no. 5–6 in 1967; the French debut was in the magazine Manteia, no. 5 (1968). The essay later appeared in an anthology of Barthes' essays, Image-Music-Text (1977), a book that also included his "From Work to Text".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autoethnography</span> Research method using personal experience

Autoethnography is a form of ethnographic research in which a researcher connects personal experiences to wider cultural, political, and social meanings and understandings. It is considered a form of qualitative and/or arts-based research.

<i>Inventio</i> Canon of rhetoric

Inventio, one of the five canons of rhetoric, is the method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric and comes from the Latin word, meaning "invention" or "discovery". Inventio is the central, indispensable canon of rhetoric, and traditionally means a systematic search for arguments.

Text types in literature form the basic styles of writing. Factual texts merely seek to inform, whereas literary texts seek to entertain or otherwise engage the reader by using creative language and imagery. There are many aspects to literary writing, and many ways to analyse it, but four basic categories are descriptive, narrative, expository, and argumentative.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progymnasmata</span> Exercises in rhetoric

Progymnasmata are a series of preliminary rhetorical exercises that began in ancient Greece and continued during the Roman Empire. These exercises were implemented by students of rhetoric, who began their schooling between ages twelve and fifteen. The purpose of these exercises was to prepare students for writing declamations after they had completed their education with the grammarians. There are only four surviving handbooks of progymnasmata, attributed to Aelius Theon, Hermogenes of Tarsus, Aphthonius of Antioch, and Nicolaus the Sophist.

A thesis statement is a statement of one's core argument, the main idea(s), and/or a concise summary of an essay, research paper, etc. It is usually expressed in one or two sentences near the beginning of a paper, and may be reiterated elsewhere, such as in the conclusion. In some contexts, such as in the British educational system, a thesis statement is generally considered synonymous with one's argument.

In expository writing, a topic sentence is a sentence that summarizes the main idea of a paragraph. It is usually the first sentence in a paragraph.

An annotated bibliography is a bibliography that gives a summary of each of the entries. The purpose of annotations is to provide the reader with a summary and an evaluation of each source. Each summary should be a concise exposition of the source's central idea(s) and give the reader a general idea of the source's content.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal writing</span> Pleading in civil and criminal law

Legal writing involves the analysis of fact patterns and presentation of arguments in documents such as legal memoranda and briefs. One form of legal writing involves drafting a balanced analysis of a legal problem or issue. Another form of legal writing is persuasive, and advocates in favor of a legal position. Another form involves drafting legal instruments, such as contracts and wills.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetorical modes</span> Major types of writing and speaking

The rhetorical modes are a broad traditional classification of the major kinds of formal and academic writing by their rhetorical (persuasive) purpose: narration, description, exposition, and argumentation. First attempted by Samuel P. Newman in A Practical System of Rhetoric in 1827, the modes of discourse have long influenced US writing instruction and particularly the design of mass-market writing assessments, despite critiques of the explanatory power of these classifications for non-school writing.

The five-paragraph essay is a format of essay having five paragraphs: one introductory paragraph, three body paragraphs with support and development, and one concluding paragraph. Because of this structure, it is also known as a hamburger essay, one three one, or a three-tier essay.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feature story</span> Piece of non-fiction writing about news

A feature story is a piece of non-fiction writing about news covering a single topic in detail. A feature story is a type of soft news, news primarily focused on entertainment rather than a higher level of professionalism. The main subtypes are the news feature and the human-interest story.

The Jane Schaffer method is a formula for essay writing that is taught in some U.S. middle schools and high schools. Developed by a San Diego teacher named Jane Schaffer, who started offering training and a 45-day curriculum in 1995, it is intended to help students who struggle with structuring essays by providing a framework. Originally developed for personal narratives and essays about literature, the curriculum now also covers expository and argument essays.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secondary source</span> Document that discusses information originally presented elsewhere

In scholarship, a secondary source is a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. A secondary source contrasts with a primary, or original, source of the information being discussed. A primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation or it may be a document created by such a person.

References

  1. 1 2 Carrell, Patricia L.; Connor, Ulla (1991). "Reading and Writing Descriptive and Persuasive Texts". The Modern Language Journal. 75 (3): 314–324. doi:10.2307/328725. ISSN   0026-7902.
  2. 1 2 "Counterargument | Harvard College Writing Center". writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu. Retrieved 2024-12-10.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 n.d, n.d. "Persuasive writing" (PDF). The Writing Center.
  4. 1 2 3 "Writing for success (Chapter 10.9: Persuasion)". University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 2015-10-27.
  5. 1 2 3 Polak, Adam. "Writing a Persuasive Essay" (PDF). Hamilton.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Jonsen, Karsten; Fendt, Jacqueline; Point, Sébastien (2018-01-01). "Convincing Qualitative Research: What Constitutes Persuasive Writing?". Organizational Research Methods. 21 (1): 30–67. doi:10.1177/1094428117706533. ISSN   1094-4281.
  7. ↑ Kaufman, Peter (2013-01-01). "Scribo Ergo Cogito: Reflexivity through Writing". Teaching Sociology. 41 (1): 70–81. doi:10.1177/0092055X12458679. ISSN   0092-055X.
  8. ↑ Liao, Shen-yi; Gendler, Tamar (2020), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), "Imagination", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2024-12-10
  9. ↑ Petraglia, Joseph (2009-03-10). "The Importance of Being Authentic: Persuasion, Narration, and Dialogue in Health Communication and Education". Health Communication. doi:10.1080/10410230802676771. ISSN   1041-0236.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.