Imagination

Last updated
Olin Levi Warner, Imagination (1896). Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C. Imagination-Warner-Highsmith.jpeg
Olin Levi Warner, Imagination (1896). Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building, Washington, D.C.

Imagination is the production of sensations, feelings and thoughts informing oneself. [1] These experiences can be re-creations of past experiences, such as vivid memories with imagined changes, or completely invented and possibly fantastic scenes. [2] Imagination helps apply knowledge to solve problems and is fundamental to integrating experience and the learning process. [3] [4] [5]

Contents

Imagination is the process of developing theories and ideas based on the functioning of the mind through a creative division. Drawing from actual perceptions, imagination employs intricate conditional processes that engage both semantic and episodic memory to generate new or refined ideas. [6] This part of the mind helps develop better and easier ways to accomplish tasks, whether old or new.

A way to train imagination is by listening to and practicing storytelling (narrative), [3] [7] wherein imagination is expressed through stories and writings such as fairy tales, fantasies, and science fiction. [8] When children develop their imagination, they often exercise it through pretend play. They use role-playing to act out what they have imagined, and followingly, they play on by acting as if their make-believe scenarios are actual reality. [9]

Etymology

The English word "imagination" originates from the Latin term "imaginatio," which is the standard Latin translation of the Greek term "phantasia." The Latin term also translates to "mental image" or "fancy." The use of the word "imagination" in English can be traced back to the mid-14th century, referring to a faculty of the mind that forms and manipulates images. [10]

Definition

In modern philosophical understanding, imagination is commonly seen as a faculty for creating mental images and for making non-rational, associative transitions among these images. [11]

One view of imagination links it to cognition, suggesting that imagination is a cognitive process in mental functioning. [12] It is also associated with rational thinking in a way that both imaginative and rational thoughts involve the cognitive process that "underpins thinking about possibilities". [13] However, imagination is not considered to be purely a cognitive activity because it is also linked to the body and place. It involves setting up relationships with materials and people, precluding the notion that imagination is confined to the mind. [14]

The psychological view of imagination relates this concept to a cognate term, "mental imagery," which denotes the process of reviving in the mind recollections of objects previously given in sense perception. Since this use of the term conflicts with that of ordinary language, some psychologists prefer to describe this process as "imaging" or "imagery" or to speak of it as "reproductive" as opposed to "productive" or "constructive" imagination. Constructive imagination is further divided into voluntary imagination driven by the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), such as mental rotation, and involuntary imagination (LPFC-independent), such as REM sleep dreaming, daydreaming, hallucinations, and spontaneous insight. [15] In clinical settings, clinicians nowadays increasingly make use of visual imagery for psychological treatment of anxiety disorders, depression, schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease. [16]

Conceptual history

Ancient

Ancient Greek philosophers conceived imagination, or "phantasia," as working with "pictures" in the sense of mental images. [17] Aristotle, in his work De Anima , identified imagination as a faculty that enables an image to occur within us, [18] [19] a definition associating imagination with a broad range of activities involved in thoughts, dreams, and memories. [19]

In Philebus , Plato discusses daydreaming and considers imagination about the future as the work of a painter within the soul. [20] However, Plato portrayed this painter as an illustrator rather than a creator, reflecting his view of imagination as a representational rather than an inventive faculty. [21]

Greek philosophers typically distinguished imagination from perception and rational thinking: "For imagination is different from either perceiving or discursive thinking, though it is not found without sensation, or judgement without it" ( De Anima , iii 3). [18] [21] Aristotle viewed imagination as a faculty that mediates between the senses and intellect. [19] The mental images it manipulates, whether arising from visions, dreams or sensory perception, were thought to be transmitted through the lower parts of the soul, suggesting that these images could be influenced by emotions and primal desires, thereby confusing the judgement of the intellect. [21]

Middle Ages

In the Middle Ages, the concept of imagination encompassed domains such as religion, literature, artwork, and notably, poetry. [22] Men of science often recognized poets as "imaginative," viewing imagination as the mental faculty that specifically permitted poetry writing. [23] This association, they suggested, lies in the capacity of imagination for image-making and image-forming, which results in a sense of "visualizing" with "the inner eye." [17] [24]

An epitome of this concept is Chaucer's idea of the "mind's eye" in The Man of Law's Tale from The Canterbury Tales (ca. 1390). He described a man who, although blind, was able to "see" with an "eye of his mind":

"That oon of hem was blynd and myghte not see, / But it were with thilke eyen of his mynde / With whiche men seen, after that they ben blynde." [25] [26]

Medieval theories of faculty psychology posited imagination as a faculty of the internal senses (alongside memory and common sense): imagination receives mental images from memory or perception, organizes them, and transmits them to the reasoning faculties, providing the intellect with sense data. [27] [28] In this way, it enables the reshaping of images from sense perception (even in the absence of perception, such as in dreams), performing a filtering function of reality. [23] [29]

Medieval paintings of imaginary creatures, as seen in frescos and manuscripts, often combined body parts of different animals, and even humans. 13th-century unknown painters - Legendary Creatures - WGA19736.jpg
Medieval paintings of imaginary creatures, as seen in frescos and manuscripts, often combined body parts of different animals, and even humans.

Although not attributed the capacity for creations, imagination was thought to combine images received from memory or perception in creative ways, allowing for the invention of novel concepts or expressions. [28] For example, it could fuse images of "gold" and "mountain" to produce the idea of a "golden mountain." [30]

In medieval artistic works, imagination served the role of combining images of perceivable things to portray legendary, mysterious, or extraordinary creatures. [31] This can be seen in the depiction of a Mongolian in the Grandes Chroniques de France (1241), as well as in the portrayal of angels, demons, hell, and the apocalypse in Christian religious paintings. [21] [22]

Renaissance and early modern

The Renaissance saw the revival of classical texts and the celebration for men's dignity, yet scholars of the time did not significantly contribute to the conceptual understanding of "imagination." [17] [27] Marsilio Ficino, for example, did not regard artistic creations such as painting, sculpture and poetry as privileged forms of human creativity, nor did he attribute creativity to the faculty of imagination. Instead, Ficino posited that imagination could be the vehicle through which divine intervention transmits insights in the form of images, which ultimately facilitates the creation of art. [21] [23] [32]

Don Quixote, engrossed in reading books of chivalry. Gustave Dore - Miguel de Cervantes - Don Quixote - Part 1 - Chapter 1 - Plate 1 "A world of disorderly notions, picked out of his books, crowded into his imagination".jpg
Don Quixote, engrossed in reading books of chivalry.

Nevertheless, the groundwork laid by humanists made it easier for later thinkers to develop the connection between imagination and creativity. [21] Early modern philosophers began to consider imagination as a trait or ability that an individual could possess. Miguel de Cervantes, influenced by Spanish physician and philosopher Juan Huarte de San Juan, crafted the iconic character Don Quixote, who epitomized Huarte's idea of "wits full of invention." [29] [33] [34] This type of wit was thought to be typically found in individuals for whom imagination was the most prominent component of their "ingenium" (Spanish : ingenio; term meaning close to "intellect"). [35] [29] [36] [37]

Early modern philosophers also started to acknowledge imagination as an active, cognitive faculty, although it was principally seen as a mediator between sense perception (Latin : sensus) and pure understanding (Latin : intellectio pura). [17] René Descartes, in Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), interpreted imagination as a faculty actively focusing on bodies (corporeal entities) while being passively dependent on stimuli from different senses. [17] [38] [39] In the writing of Thomas Hobbes, imagination became a key element of human cognition. [40]

In the 16th and 17th centuries, the connotations of imagination" extended to many areas of early modern civic life. [41] [42] Juan Luis Vives noted the connection between imagination and rhetoric skills. [43] Huarte extended this idea, linking imagination to any disciplines that necessitates "figures, correspondence, harmony, and proportion," such as medical practice and the art of warfare. [35] [44] [45] Additionally, Galileo used the concept of imagination to conduct thought experiments, such as asking readers to imagine the direction a stone released from a sling would fly. [46]

Enlightenment and thereafter

By the Age of Enlightenment, philosophical discussions frequently linked the power of imagination with creativity, particularly in aesthetics. [47] William Duff was among the first to identify imagination as a quality of genius, distinguishing it from talent by emphasizing that only genius is characterized by creative innovation. [48] Samuel Taylor Coleridge distinguished between imagination expressing realities of an imaginal realm above our mundane personal existence, and "fancy", or fantasy, which represents the creativity of the artistic soul. [49] In Preliminary Discourseto the EncyclopediaofDiderot (French : Discours Préliminaire des Éditeurs), d'Alembert referred to imagination as the creative force for Fine Arts. [50]

Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Pure Reason (German : Kritik der reinen Vernunft), viewed imagination (German : Einbildungskraft) as a faculty of intuition, capable of making "presentations," i.e., sensible representations of objects that are not directly present. [51] Kant distinguished two forms of imagination: productive and reproductive. Productive imagination functions as the original source of the presentation of an object, thus preceding experience; while reproductive imagination generates presentations derived from past experiences, recalling empirical intuitions it previously had. [52] Kant's treatise linked imagination to cognition, perception, aesthetic judgement, artistic creation, and morality. [51] [53]

The Kantian idea prepared the way for Fichte, Schelling and the Romantics to transform the philosophical understanding of it into an authentic creative force, associated with genius, inventive activity, and freedom. [54] In the work of Hegel, imagination, though not given as much importance as by his predecessors, served as a starting point for the defense of Hegelian phenomenology. Hegel distinguished between a phenomenological account of imagination, which focuses on the lived experience and consciousness, and a scientific, speculative account, which seeks to understand the nature and function of imagination in a systematic and theoretical manner. [55]

Modern

Between 1913 and 1916, Carl Jung developed the concept of "active imagination" and introduced it into psychotherapy. [56] For Jung, active imagination often includes working with dreams and the creative self via imagination or fantasy. It is a meditation technique wherein the contents of one's unconscious are translated into images, narratives, or personified as separate entities, thus serving as a bridge between the conscious "ego" and the unconscious. [57]

Albert Einstein famously said: "Imagination... is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world." [58]

Nikola Tesla described imagination as: "When I get an idea I start at once building it up in my imagination. I change the construction, make improvements and operate the device in my mind. It is absolutely immaterial to me whether I run my turbine in thought or test it in my shop. I even note if it is out of balance. There is no difference whatever, the results are the same. In this way I am able to rapidly develop and perfect a conception without touching anything." [59]

The phenomenology of imagination is discussed in The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination (French : L'Imaginaire: Psychologie phénoménologique de l'imagination), also published under the title The Psychology of the Imagination, a 1940 book by Jean-Paul Sartre. In this book, Sartre propounded his concept of imagination, with imaginary objects being "melanges of past impressions and recent knowledge," and discussed what the existence of imagination shows about the nature of human consciousness. [60] Based on Sartre's work, subsequent thinkers extended this idea into the realm of sociology, proposing ideas such as imaginary and the ontology of imagination. [61] [62]

Cross cultural

Imagination has been, and continues to be a well-acknowledged concept in many cultures, particularly within religious contexts, as an image-forming faculty of the mind. [63] In Buddhist aesthetics, imagination plays a crucial role in religious practice, especially in visualization practices, which include the recollection of the Buddha's body, visualization of celestial Buddhas and Buddha-fields (Pure Lands and mandalas), and devotion to images. [64] [65]

In Zhuang Zi's Taoism, imagination is perceived as a complex mental activity that is championed as a vital form of cognition. It is defended on empathetic grounds but discredited by the rational intellect as only a presentation and fantasy. [63]

In psychological research

Memory

Memory and mental imagery are two mental activities involved in the process of imagination, each influencing the other. [66] Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology shows that remembering and imagining activate the identical parts of the brain. [66] When compared to the recall of common ideas, the generation of new and old original ideas exhibits a similar activation pattern, particularly in the bilateral parahippocampal and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) regions. This suggests that the construction of new ideas relies on processes similar to those in the reconstruction of original ideas from episodic memory. [67]

Perception

Piaget posited that a person's perceptions depend on their world view. The world view is the result of arranging perceptions into existing imagery by imagination. Piaget cites the example of a child saying that the moon is following her when she walks around the village at night. Like this, perceptions are integrated into the world view so that they make sense. Imagination is needed to make sense of perceptions. [68]

Brain activation

The neocortex and thalamus are crucial in controlling the brain's imagination, as well as other functions such as consciousness and abstract thought. Imagination involves many different brain functions, including emotions, memory, and thoughts. [69] [70]

Visual imagery involves a network of brain areas from the frontal cortex to sensory areas, overlapping with the default mode network, and can function much like a weak version of afferent perception. [71]

A study that used fMRI while subjects were asked to imagine precise visual figures, to mentally disassemble them, or mentally blend them, showed activity in the occipital, frontoparietal, posterior parietal, precuneus, and dorsolateral prefrontal regions of the subject's brains. [72]

Evolutionary theory

Phylogenesis and ontogenesis of various components of imagination TheoryLargeFigures.png
Phylogenesis and ontogenesis of various components of imagination

Phylogenetic acquisition of imagination was a gradual process. The simplest form of imagination, REM-sleep dreaming, evolved in mammals with acquisition of REM sleep 140 million years ago. [73] Spontaneous insight improved in primates with acquisition of the lateral prefrontal cortex 70 million years ago. After hominins split from the chimpanzee line 6 million years ago they further improved their imagination. Prefrontal analysis was acquired 3.3 million years ago when hominins started to manufacture Mode One stone tools. [74] Progress in stone tools culture to Mode Two stone tools by 2 million years ago signifies remarkable improvement of prefrontal analysis. The most advanced mechanism of imagination, prefrontal synthesis, was likely acquired by humans around 70,000 years ago and resulted in behavioral modernity. [75] This leap toward modern imagination has been characterized by paleoanthropologists as the "Cognitive revolution", [76] "Upper Paleolithic Revolution", [77] and the "Great Leap Forward". [78]

Moral imagination

Moral imagination usually describes the mental capacity to find answers to ethical questions and dilemmas through the process of imagination and visualization. Different definitions of "moral imagination" can be found in the literature. [79]

The philosopher Mark Johnson described it as "[an ability to imaginatively discern various possibilities for acting in a given situation and to envision the potential help and harm that are likely to result from a given action." [80]

In one proposed example, Hitler's assassin Claus von Stauffenberg was said to have decided to dare to overthrow the Nazi regime as a result (among other factors) of a process of "moral imagination." His willingness to kill Hitler was less due to his compassion for his comrades, his family, or friends living at that time, but from thinking about the potential problems of later generations and people he did not know. In other words, through a process of moral imagination he developed empathy for "abstract" people (for example, Germans of later generations, people who were not yet alive). [81]

Artificial imagination

As a subcomponent of artificial general intelligence, artificial imagination generates, simulates, and facilitates [82] real or possible fiction models to create predictions, inventions, [83] or conscious experiences. The term also refers to the capability of machines or programs to simulate human activities, including creativity, vision, digital art, humour, and satire. [84]

The research fields of artificial imagination traditionally include (artificial) visual [85] and aural imagination, [86] which extend to all actions involved in forming ideas, images, and concepts—activities linked to imagination. Practitioners are also exploring topics such as artificial visual memory, modeling and filtering content based on human emotions, and interactive search. [87] Additionally, there is interest in how artificial imagination may evolve to create an artificial world comfortable enough for people to use as an escape from reality. [88]

A subfield of artificial imagination that receives rising concern is artificial morals. Artificial intelligence faces challenges regarding the responsibility for machines' mistakes or decisions [89] [90] and the difficulty in creating machines with universally accepted moral rules. [91] Recent research in artificial morals bypasses the strict definition of morality, using machine learning methods to train machines to imitate human morals instead. [92] [93] However, by considering data about moral decisions from thousands of people, the trained moral model may reflect widely accepted rules. [93]

See also

Related Research Articles

Cognitive psychology is the scientific study of mental processes such as attention, language use, memory, perception, problem solving, creativity, and reasoning. Cognitive psychology originated in the 1960s in a break from behaviorism, which held from the 1920s to 1950s that unobservable mental processes were outside the realm of empirical science. This break came as researchers in linguistics and cybernetics, as well as applied psychology, used models of mental processing to explain human behavior. Work derived from cognitive psychology was integrated into other branches of psychology and various other modern disciplines like cognitive science, linguistics, and economics. The domain of cognitive psychology overlaps with that of cognitive science, which takes a more interdisciplinary approach and includes studies of non-human subjects and artificial intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concept</span> Mental representation or an abstract object

A concept is an abstract idea that serves as a foundation for more concrete principles, thoughts, and beliefs. Concepts play an important role in all aspects of cognition. As such, concepts are studied within such disciplines as linguistics, psychology, and philosophy, and these disciplines are interested in the logical and psychological structure of concepts, and how they are put together to form thoughts and sentences. The study of concepts has served as an important flagship of an emerging interdisciplinary approach, cognitive science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mind</span> Totality of psychological phenomena

The mind is what thinks, feels, perceives, imagines, remembers, and wills, encompassing the totality of mental phenomena. It includes both conscious processes, through which an individual is aware of external and internal circumstances, and unconscious processes, which can influence an individual without intention or awareness. Traditionally, minds were often conceived as separate entities that can exist on their own but are more commonly understood as features or capacities of other entities in the contemporary discourse. The mind plays a central role in most aspects of human life but its exact nature is disputed; some theorists suggest that all mental phenomena are private and directly knowable, transform information, have the ability to refer to and represent other entities, or are dispositions to engage in behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy of perception</span> Branch of philosophy

The philosophy of perception is concerned with the nature of perceptual experience and the status of perceptual data, in particular how they relate to beliefs about, or knowledge of, the world. Any explicit account of perception requires a commitment to one of a variety of ontological or metaphysical views. Philosophers distinguish internalist accounts, which assume that perceptions of objects, and knowledge or beliefs about them, are aspects of an individual's mind, and externalist accounts, which state that they constitute real aspects of the world external to the individual. The position of naïve realism—the 'everyday' impression of physical objects constituting what is perceived—is to some extent contradicted by the occurrence of perceptual illusions and hallucinations and the relativity of perceptual experience as well as certain insights in science. Realist conceptions include phenomenalism and direct and indirect realism. Anti-realist conceptions include idealism and skepticism. Recent philosophical work have expanded on the philosophical features of perception by going beyond the single paradigm of vision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thought</span> Cognitive process independent of the senses

In their most common sense, the terms thought and thinking refer to cognitive processes that can happen independently of sensory stimulation. Their most paradigmatic forms are judging, reasoning, concept formation, problem solving, and deliberation. But other mental processes, like considering an idea, memory, or imagination, are also often included. These processes can happen internally independent of the sensory organs, unlike perception. But when understood in the widest sense, any mental event may be understood as a form of thinking, including perception and unconscious mental processes. In a slightly different sense, the term thought refers not to the mental processes themselves but to mental states or systems of ideas brought about by these processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creativity</span> Forming something new and somehow valuable

Creativity is the ability to form novel and valuable ideas or works using the imagination. Products of creativity may be intangible or a physical object. Creativity may also describe the ability to find new solutions to problems, or new methods of performing a task or reaching a goal. Creativity therefore enables people to solve problems in new or innovative ways.

Artificial consciousness, also known as machine consciousness, synthetic consciousness, or digital consciousness, is the consciousness hypothesized to be possible in artificial intelligence. It is also the corresponding field of study, which draws insights from philosophy of mind, philosophy of artificial intelligence, cognitive science and neuroscience. The same terminology can be used with the term "sentience" instead of "consciousness" when specifically designating phenomenal consciousness.

In the philosophy of mind, neuroscience, and cognitive science, a mental image is an experience that, on most occasions, significantly resembles the experience of "perceiving" some object, event, or scene but occurs when the relevant object, event, or scene is not actually present to the senses. There are sometimes episodes, particularly on falling asleep and waking up, when the mental imagery may be dynamic, phantasmagoric, and involuntary in character, repeatedly presenting identifiable objects or actions, spilling over from waking events, or defying perception, presenting a kaleidoscopic field, in which no distinct object can be discerned. Mental imagery can sometimes produce the same effects as would be produced by the behavior or experience imagined.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dual-coding theory</span> Theory of cognition

Dual-coding theory is a theory of cognition that suggests that the mind processes information along two different channels; verbal and nonverbal. It was hypothesized by Allan Paivio of the University of Western Ontario in 1971. In developing this theory, Paivio used the idea that the formation of mental imagery aids learning through the picture superiority effect.

The cognitive revolution was an intellectual movement that began in the 1950s as an interdisciplinary study of the mind and its processes, from which emerged a new field known as cognitive science. The preexisting relevant fields were psychology, linguistics, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, and philosophy. The approaches used were developed within the then-nascent fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and neuroscience. In the 1960s, the Harvard Center for Cognitive Studies and the Center for Human Information Processing at the University of California, San Diego were influential in developing the academic study of cognitive science. By the early 1970s, the cognitive movement had surpassed behaviorism as a psychological paradigm. Furthermore, by the early 1980s the cognitive approach had become the dominant line of research inquiry across most branches in the field of psychology.

Information processing theory is the approach to the study of cognitive development evolved out of the American experimental tradition in psychology. Developmental psychologists who adopt the information processing perspective account for mental development in terms of maturational changes in basic components of a child's mind. The theory is based on the idea that humans process the information they receive, rather than merely responding to stimuli. This perspective uses an analogy to consider how the mind works like a computer. In this way, the mind functions like a biological computer responsible for analyzing information from the environment. According to the standard information-processing model for mental development, the mind's machinery includes attention mechanisms for bringing information in, working memory for actively manipulating information, and long-term memory for passively holding information so that it can be used in the future. This theory addresses how as children grow, their brains likewise mature, leading to advances in their ability to process and respond to the information they received through their senses. The theory emphasizes a continuous pattern of development, in contrast with cognitive-developmental theorists such as Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development that thought development occurs in stages at a time.

Creative visualization is the cognitive process of purposefully generating visual mental imagery, with eyes open or closed, simulating or recreating visual perception, in order to maintain, inspect, and transform those images, consequently modifying their associated emotions or feelings, with intent to experience a subsequent beneficial physiological, psychological, or social effect, such as expediting the healing of wounds to the body, minimizing physical pain, alleviating psychological pain including anxiety, sadness, and low mood, improving self-esteem or self-confidence, and enhancing the capacity to cope when interacting with others.

Active imagination refers to a process or technique of engaging with the ideas or imaginings of one's mind. It is used as a mental strategy to communicate with the subconscious mind. In Jungian psychology, it is a method for bridging the conscious and unconscious minds. Instead of being linked to the Jungian process, the word "active imagination" in modern psychology is most frequently used to describe a propensity to have a very creative and present imagination. It is thought to be a crucial aid in the process of individuation.

The philosophy of mind is a branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of the mind and its relation to the body and the external world.

Artificial imagination is a narrow subcomponent of artificial general intelligence which generates, simulates, and facilitates real or possible fiction models to create predictions, inventions, or conscious experiences.

Motor imagery is a mental process by which an individual rehearses or simulates a given action. It is widely used in sport training as mental practice of action, neurological rehabilitation, and has also been employed as a research paradigm in cognitive neuroscience and cognitive psychology to investigate the content and the structure of covert processes that precede the execution of action. In some medical, musical, and athletic contexts, when paired with physical rehearsal, mental rehearsal can be as effective as pure physical rehearsal (practice) of an action.

Guided imagery is a mind-body intervention by which a trained practitioner or teacher helps a participant or patient to evoke and generate mental images that simulate or recreate the sensory perception of sights, sounds, tastes, smells, movements, and images associated with touch, such as texture, temperature, and pressure, as well as imaginative or mental content that the participant or patient experiences as defying conventional sensory categories, and that may precipitate strong emotions or feelings in the absence of the stimuli to which correlating sensory receptors are receptive.

Mary Cheves West Perky (1874–1940) was an American psychologist and one of the twenty-one female students who studied under Edward B. Titchener at Cornell University. She received a Ph.D. in 1910 for her groundbreaking work on visual, auditory, and olfactory imagery. Her findings have had a considerable impact by being cited by name in the title of an article as recently as 2012. ] According to her findings, perception is not merely a representation of the external world, but is also influenced by thoughts, expectations, and mental images. In the same year, she performed the "Banana Experiment," which demonstrated how perception and visual imagery could be confused; a phenomenon known as the Perky Effect. She concluded that mental imagery is not merely a weak form of perception, but it can directly influence our sensory perceptions. which examines the link between mental imagery and visual perception.

Aphantasia is the inability to visualize.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prefrontal synthesis</span> Conscious process of synthesizing mental images

Prefrontal synthesis is the conscious purposeful process of synthesizing novel mental images. PFS is neurologically different from the other types of imagination, such as simple memory recall and dreaming. Unlike dreaming, which is spontaneous and not controlled by the prefrontal cortex (PFC), PFS is controlled by and completely dependent on the intact lateral prefrontal cortex. Unlike simple memory recall that involves activation of a single neuronal ensemble (NE) encoded at some point in the past, PFS involves active combination of two or more object-encoding neuronal ensembles (objectNE). The mechanism of PFS is hypothesized to involve synchronization of several independent objectNEs. When objectNEs fire out-of-sync, the objects are perceived one at a time. However, once those objectNEs are time-shifted by the lateral PFC to fire in-phase with each other, they are consciously experienced as one unified object or scene.

References

  1. "Mental Imagery". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2021.
  2. Szczelkun, Stefan (2018-03-03). Sense Think Act: a collection of exercises to experience total human ability. Stefan Szczelkun. ISBN   9781870736107. To imagine is to form experiences in the mind. These can be recreations of past experiences as they happened such as vivid memories with imagined changes, or they can be completely invented and possibly fantastic scenes.
  3. 1 2 Norman, Ron (2000). "Cultivating Imagination in Adult Education". Proceedings of the 41st Annual Adult Education Research: 1–2.
  4. Sutton-Smith, Brian (1988). "In Search of the Imagination". In Egan, K.; Nadaner, D. (eds.). Imagination and Education. New York: Teachers College Press. p. 22.
  5. Egan, Kieran (1992). Imagination in Teaching and Learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 50.
  6. Devitt, Aleea L.; Addis, Donna Rose; Schacter, Daniel L. (2017-10-01). "Episodic and semantic content of memory and imagination: A multilevel analysis". Memory & Cognition. 45 (7): 1078–1094. doi:10.3758/s13421-017-0716-1. ISSN   1532-5946. PMC   5702280 . PMID   28547677.
  7. Frye, Northrop (1963). The Educated Imagination. Toronto: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. p. 49.
  8. "Top Science Fiction and Fantasy Magazines 2023". 10 August 2023.
  9. Goldman, Laurence (1998). Child's play: myth, mimesis and make-believe. Oxford New York: Berg Publishers. ISBN   978-1-85973-918-1. Basically what this means is that the children use their make-believe situation and act as if what they are acting out is from a reality that already exists even though they have made it up.imagination comes after story created.[ page needed ]
  10. "imagination | Etymology of imagination by etymonline". www.etymonline.com. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
  11. Cottrell, Jonathan (2016), "Imagination, in modern philosophy", Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1 ed.), London: Routledge, doi:10.4324/9780415249126-da083-1, ISBN   978-0-415-25069-6 , retrieved 2024-07-31
  12. Byrne, Ruth M. J. (2007) [2005]. The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 38. ISBN   9780262261845 . Retrieved 29 September 2022. Rational thought and imaginative thought may be based on the same kinds of cognitive processes, processes that underpin thinking about possibilities.
  13. Vergunst, Jo (2012). "Seeing Ruins: Imagined and Visible Lands in North-East Scotland". In Janowski, Monica; Ingold, Tim (eds.). Imagining Landscapes: Past, Present and Future. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN   9781409461449.
  14. Vyshedskiy, Andrey (2020). "Voluntary and Involuntary Imagination: Neurological Mechanisms, Developmental Path, Clinical Implications, and Evolutionary Trajectory". Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture. 4 (2): 1–18. doi:10.26613/esic.4.2.186. ISSN   2472-9884. JSTOR   10.26613/esic.4.2.186. S2CID   231912956.
  15. Pearson, Joel (2020-06-18). "The Visual Imagination". In Abraham, Anna (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 175. ISBN   9781108429245 . Retrieved 12 October 2022. Visual imagery typically refers to the voluntary creation of the conscious visual experience of an object or scene in its absence (e.g. solely in the mind). [...] imagery can play a core role in many anxiety disorders, depression, schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease, and is increasingly harnessed as a uniquely powerful tool for psychological treatment [...].
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Pätzold, Deltev (2004). "Imagination in Descartes' Meditations". In Nauta, Lodi; Pätzold, Detlev (eds.). Imagination in the later Middle Ages and Early Modern times. Groningen studies in cultural change. Leuven, Dudley, MA: Peeters. pp. 153–159, 172–173. ISBN   978-90-429-1535-0.
  17. 1 2 "The Internet Classics Archive | On the Soul by Aristotle". classics.mit.edu. Retrieved 2024-07-04.
  18. 1 2 3 "Aristotle's Psychology > Imagination (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2024-06-10.
  19. "The Internet Classics Archive | Philebus by Plato". classics.mit.edu. Retrieved 2024-07-30.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cocking, John (1991-12-12). Murray, Penelope (ed.). Imagination: A Study in the History of Ideas. London: Routledge. pp. 1, 8, 105–106. doi:10.4324/9780203980811. ISBN   978-0-203-98081-1.
  21. 1 2 Le Goff, Jacques (1988). The medieval imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN   978-0-226-47084-9.
  22. 1 2 3 Sumillera, Rocío G. (2016). "From Inspiration to Imagination: The Physiology of Poetry in Early Modernity". Parergon. 33 (3): 17–42. doi:10.1353/pgn.2016.0129. ISSN   1832-8334.
  23. Castor, G. (1964). Pléiade poetics a study in sixteenth-century thought and terminology [Dissertation]. At the University Press.
  24. metaphors.lib.virginia.edu http://metaphors.lib.virginia.edu/metaphors/8723 . Retrieved 2024-07-28.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  25. Chaucer, Geoffrey. "The Man of Laws Tale". In Wyatt, A.J. (ed.). The Canterbury Tales. London: University Correspondence College Press. Lines 550–553.
  26. 1 2 Schmitt, C. B.; Skinner, Quentin; Kessler, Eckhard; Kraye, Jill, eds. (1988). The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/chol9780521251044. ISBN   978-0-521-25104-4.
  27. 1 2 Kooij, Suzanne (2004). "Poetic Imagination and the Paradigm of Painting in Early-modern France". In Nauta, Lodi; Pätzold, Detlev (eds.). Imagination in the later Middle Ages and Early Modern times. Groningen studies in cultural change. Leuven, Dudley, MA: Peeters. ISBN   978-90-429-1535-0.
  28. 1 2 3 Orobitg, Christine (2021). "Wit, Imagination, and the Goat". In Jaén, Isabel; Simon, Julien Jacques (eds.). Cervantes and the early modern mind. Routledge studies in Renaissance literature and culture. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 98–105. ISBN   978-0-415-78547-1.
  29. Harvey, E. Ruth (1975). The inward wits: psychological theory in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Warburg Institute surveys. London: Warburg Institute. ISBN   978-0-85481-051-2.
  30. Bovey, Alixe (2002). Monsters and grotesques in medieval manuscripts. Toronto ; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. ISBN   978-0-8020-8512-2. OCLC   49649965.
  31. Frisvold, Nicholaj de Mattos (2013-01-01). "Marsilio Ficino and His Platonic Psychology".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  32. de Iriarte, Mauricio. "El Ingenioso hidalgo y el Examen de ingenios : (qué debe Cervantes al Dr. Huarte de San Juan)". Revista internacional de los estudios vascos (in Spanish). 24 (4): 499–522.
  33. Green, Otis H. (1970). The literary mind of medieval & Renaissance Spain: essays. Studies in Romance languages. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN   978-0-8131-1204-6.
  34. 1 2 Huarte de San Juan, Juan (1594). The examination of mens wits. Translated by Carew, Richard. London. pp. 69–70, 103.
  35. Orobitg, Christine (2014-07-01). "Del Examen de ingenios de Huarte a la ficción cervantina, o cómo se forja una revolución literaria". Criticón (in Spanish) (120–121): 23–39. doi:10.4000/criticon.700. ISSN   0247-381X.
  36. Mestre Zaragozá, Marina (2018-08-29). "Les métiers de l'imagination dans l'Examen de ingenios para las ciencias de Huarte de San Juan". Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes. Journal of medieval and humanistic studies (in French) (35): 339–364. doi:10.4000/crm.15497. ISSN   2115-6360.
  37. Clarke, Desmond M. (2003). Descartes's theory of mind. Oxford : Oxford ; New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-926123-9. OCLC   52878350.
  38. Newman, Lex (2023), "Descartes' Epistemology", in Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2024-07-29
  39. Runco, Mark A.; Albert, Robert S. (2010). "Creativity Research" . In Kaufman, James C.; Sternberg, Robert J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-73025-9.
  40. Crane, William G. (1937-12-31). Wit and Rhetoric in the Renaissance. Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/cran94640. ISBN   978-0-231-89968-0.
  41. Marr, Alexander; Garrod, Raphaële; Marcaida, José Ramón; Oosterhoff, Richard J. (2018-10-02). Logodaedalus. University of Pittsburgh Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvcb5c95. ISBN   978-0-8229-8630-0.
  42. Mack, Peter (2004). "Early Modern Ideas of Imagination: The Rhetoric Tradition". In Nauta, Lodi; Pätzold, Detlev (eds.). Imagination in the later Middle Ages and Early Modern times. Groningen studies in cultural change. Leuven, Dudley, MA: Peeters. pp. 59–60. ISBN   978-90-429-1535-0.
  43. Arrizabalaga, Jon (2018-08-29). "La medicina en Huarte de San Juan. Práctica clínica versus filosofía natural1". Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes (35): 405–426. doi:10.4000/crm.15521. ISSN   2115-6360.
  44. Arrizabalaga, Jon; Giordano, Maria Laura (2020-12-30). "Cristianismo paulino en Huarte de San Juan: meritocracia y linaje en el Examen de ingenios para las ciencias (Baeza 1575, 1594)". Hispania Sacra. 72 (146): 363–375. doi:10.3989/hs.2020.025. hdl: 10261/235630 . ISSN   1988-4265.
  45. Franklin, James (2000). "Diagrammatic reasoning and modelling in the imagination: the secret weapons of the Scientific Revolution" (PDF). In Freeland, Guy; Corones, Anthony (eds.). 1543 and All That: Image and Word, Change and Continuity in the Proto-Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 53–115. ISBN   9780792359135.
  46. Kristeller, Paul Oskar; Tatarkiewicz, Wladyslaw; Kasparek, Christopher (January 1981). "A History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics". The Journal of Philosophy. 78 (1): 56. doi:10.2307/2025397. ISSN   0022-362X. JSTOR   2025397.
  47. Dacey, John (1999). "Concepts of Creativity: A history". In Runco, Mark A.; Pritzer, Steven R. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Creativity. Vol. 1. Elsevier. ISBN   978-0-12-227076-5.
  48. Gregory, A. P. R. (2003). Coleridge and the conservative imagination. Mercer University Press. p. 59
  49. Alembert, Jean Le Rond d'; Schwab, Richard N.; Rex, Walter E. (1995). Preliminary discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot. Internet Archive. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. ISBN   978-0-226-13476-5.
  50. 1 2 Matherne, Samantha (2021). "Kant's theory of the imagination". In Fridland, Ellen; Pavese, Carlotta (eds.). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of skill and expertise. Routledge handbooks in philosophy. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN   978-1-138-74477-6.
  51. Kuehn, Manfred (2006). Louden, Robert B. (ed.). Immanuel Kant: Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. Anthro 7:167. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809569. ISBN   978-0-511-80956-9.
  52. Kneller, Jane (2007-02-08). Kant and the Power of Imagination. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487248. ISBN   978-0-521-85143-5.
  53. López-Domínguez, Virginia (2018-12-22). "The Imagination in Kant and Fichte". Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte (17). doi:10.4000/ref.952. ISSN   2258-014X.
  54. Bates, Jennifer (2004). Hegel's Theory of Imagination. State University of New York Press. doi:10.1353/book4857. ISBN   978-0-7914-8445-6.
  55. Hoerni, Ulrich; Fischer, Thomas; Kaufmann, Bettina, eds. (2019). The Art of C.G. Jung. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 260. ISBN   978-0-393-25487-7.
  56. Jung, C. G.Hg (1997-12-31). Jung on Active Imagination. Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400866854. ISBN   978-1-4008-6685-4.
  57. The Saturday Evening Post (1929-10-26). What Life Means to Einstein An Interview by George Sylvester Viereck.
  58. Tesla, Nikola (1982). My inventions : the autobiography of Nikola Tesla. Internet Archive. Williston, Vt. : Hart Bros. ISBN   978-0-910077-00-2.
  59. Sartre, Jean-Paul (1972) [1940]. The Psychology of the Imagination. London: Psychology Press. ISBN   9780415119542. OCLC   34102867.
  60. John B. Thompson, Studies in the Theory of Ideology (1984) p. 6
  61. John R. Searle, The Construction of Social Reality (Penguin 1996) p. 4
  62. 1 2 Imagination : Cross-Cultural Philosophical Analyses. Bloomsbury Academic. 2019. pp. 13–15. doi:10.5040/9781350050167. ISBN   978-1-350-05013-6.
  63. Copp, Paul (2014-12-31). The Body Incantatory: Spells and the Ritual Imagination in Medieval Chinese Buddhism. Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/copp16270. ISBN   978-0-231-16270-8.
  64. Dalton, Jacob P. (2023-01-16). Conjuring the Buddha. Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/dalt20582. ISBN   978-0-231-55618-7.
  65. 1 2 Long, Priscilla (2009-12-01). "My Brain On My Mind". The American Scholar.
  66. Benedek, Mathias; Schües, Till; Beaty, Roger E.; Jauk, Emanuel; Koschutnig, Karl; Fink, Andreas; Neubauer, Aljoscha C. (2018-02-01). "To create or to recall original ideas: Brain processes associated with the imagination of novel object uses". Cortex. 99: 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.024. ISSN   0010-9452. PMC   5796649 . PMID   29197665.
  67. Piaget, J. (1967). The child's conception of the world. Translated by Tomlinson, J.; Tomlinson, A. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  68. Abraham, Anna (2016-10-06). "The imaginative mind". Human Brain Mapping. 37 (11): 4197–4211. doi:10.1002/hbm.23300. ISSN   1065-9471. PMC   6867574 . PMID   27453527.
  69. Hustvedt, Siri (January 2011). "Three Emotional Stories: Reflections on Memory, the Imagination, Narrative, and the Self". Neuropsychoanalysis. 13 (2): 187–196. doi:10.1080/15294145.2011.10773674. ISSN   1529-4145.
  70. Pearson, Joel (October 2019). "The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 20 (10): 624–634. doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9. ISSN   1471-003X. PMID   31384033.
  71. Schlegel, Alexander; Kohler, Peter J.; Fogelson, Sergey V.; Alexander, Prescott; Konuthula, Dedeepya; Tse, Peter Ulric (16 September 2013). "Network structure and dynamics of the mental workspace". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (40): 16277–16282. Bibcode:2013PNAS..11016277S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311149110 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3791746 . PMID   24043842.
  72. Hobson, J. Allan (1 October 2009). "REM sleep and dreaming: towards a theory of protoconsciousness". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 10 (11): 803–813. doi:10.1038/nrn2716. PMID   19794431. S2CID   205505278.
  73. Harmand, Sonia; Lewis, Jason E.; Feibel, Craig S.; Lepre, Christopher J.; Prat, Sandrine; Lenoble, Arnaud; Boës, Xavier; Quinn, Rhonda L.; Brenet, Michel; Arroyo, Adrian; Taylor, Nicholas; Clément, Sophie; Daver, Guillaume; Brugal, Jean-Philip; Leakey, Louise; Mortlock, Richard A.; Wright, James D.; Lokorodi, Sammy; Kirwa, Christopher; Kent, Dennis V.; Roche, Hélène (20 May 2015). "3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya". Nature. 521 (7552): 310–315. Bibcode:2015Natur.521..310H. doi:10.1038/nature14464. PMID   25993961. S2CID   1207285.
  74. Vyshedsky, Andrey (2019). "Neuroscience of Imagination and Implications for Human Evolution" (PDF). Current Neurobiology. 10 (2): 89–109. ISSN   0975-9042. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-05-31.
  75. Harari, Yuval N. (2014). Sapiens: a brief history of humankind . London. ISBN   9781846558245. OCLC   890244744.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  76. Bar-Yosef, Ofer (October 2002). "The Upper Paleolithic Revolution". Annual Review of Anthropology. 31 (1): 363–393. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085416. ISSN   0084-6570.
  77. Diamond, Jared M. (2006). The third chimpanzee: the evolution and future of the human animal. New York: HarperPerennial. ISBN   0060845503. OCLC   63839931.
  78. Freeman, R. E.; Dmytriyev, S.; Wicks, A. C. (2018). The moral imagination of Patricia werhane: A festschrift. Springer International Publishing. p. 97.
  79. Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 202.
  80. Langhof, J. G.; Gueldenberg, S. (2021). "Whom to serve? Exploring the moral dimension of servant leadership: Answers from operation Valkyrie". Journal of Management History. 27 (4): 537–573. doi:10.1108/jmh-09-2020-0056. S2CID   238689370.
  81. Abramson, J.; Ahuja, A; Carnevale, F. (21 November 2022). "Improving Multimodal Interactive Agents with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback". p. 26. arXiv: 2211.11602 [cs.LG].
  82. Allen, K.R.; Lopez-Guevara, T.; Stachenfeld, K.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, A.; Battaglia, P.; Hamrick, J.; Pfaff, T. (1 February 2022). "Physical Design using Differentiable Learned Simulators". arXiv: 2202.00728 [cs.LG].
  83. "How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity". Harvard Business Review. 2023-06-16. ISSN   0017-8012 . Retrieved 2023-06-20.
  84. Thomee, B.; Huiskes, M.J.; Bakker, E.; Lew, M.S. (July 2007). "Visual information retrieval using synthesized imagery". Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on Image and video retrieval. ACM. pp. 127–130. doi:10.1145/1282280.1282303. ISBN   9781595937339. S2CID   11199318 . Retrieved 19 December 2023.
  85. AUDIO CONTENT TRANSMISSION by Xavier Amatriain & Perfecto Herrera, "Publications" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-01-06. Retrieved 2007-12-22.
  86. Oliva, Aude (2008). "Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (38): 14325–14329. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10514325B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105 . PMC   2533687 . PMID   18787113.
  87. Hypertext and “the Hyperreal” by Stuart Moulthrop, Yale University http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=74224.74246
  88. Tigard, Daniel W. (2021-06-10). "Artificial Moral Responsibility: How We Can and Cannot Hold Machines Responsible". Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 30 (3): 435–447. doi:10.1017/s0963180120000985. ISSN   0963-1801. PMID   34109925.
  89. Constantinescu, Mihaela; Vică, Constantin; Uszkai, Radu; Voinea, Cristina (2022-04-12). "Blame It on the AI? On the Moral Responsibility of Artificial Moral Advisors". Philosophy & Technology. 35 (2). doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00529-z. ISSN   2210-5433.
  90. Allen, Colin; Varner, Gary; Zinser, Jason (July 2000). "Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent". Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 12 (3): 251–261. doi:10.1080/09528130050111428. ISSN   0952-813X.
  91. Moser, Christine; den Hond, Frank; Lindebaum, Dirk (March 2022). "Morality in the Age of Artificially Intelligent Algorithms". Academy of Management Learning & Education. 21 (1): 139–155. doi:10.5465/amle.2020.0287. hdl: 1871.1/042dea52-f339-445e-932c-8a06c9a51c0a . ISSN   1537-260X.
  92. 1 2 Floridi, Luciano (2016-12-28). "Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 374 (2083): 20160112. Bibcode:2016RSPTA.37460112F. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0112. ISSN   1364-503X.

Further reading

Books
Articles

Three philosophers for whom imagination is a central concept are Kendall Walton, John Sallis and Richard Kearney. See in particular:

Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg The dictionary definition of imagination at Wiktionary