Endowment (philosophy)

Last updated

Endowment is a concept in philosophy that refers to human capacities and abilities which can be naturally or socially acquired. [1] Natural endowment is biologically analysed. [1] It is examined through individual genes or inborn abilities. Social endowment is explored through the culture and ethics of human lives in their communities. [1]

Contents

Natural and social endowment can be used to explain the behaviour of individuals. [2] This natural and social distinction exemplifies individuals' positions within communities. The differences in human capacities enables diverse perceptions towards a similar situation. [3] This includes Stephen Covey's human endowments, which are self-awareness, imagination, willpower, abundance mentality, courage, creativity, and self-renewal. [3]

The philosophical studies of human nature or endowment is outlined in the theories of medieval philosophers on human evolution such as; Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Aristotle, and Baruch Spinoza. [4]

Description

Endowment in philosophical terms encompasses human innate and acquired capacities. The disciplinary focus of philosophy on human capacities is inclusive in the ontological studies of human nature. [5] The innate and learned human capacities reflects the intrinsic lives and realities of human beings .

Endowment, either innate or acquired, varies among individuals and societies. Each individual consists of their own body and mind from birth until they become socially incorporated in communities where culture is learned and communal living is inevitable. [6] This enables people to live together despite their different set of innate capacities. The necessity of living together as groups in order to thrive is part of individuals' acquired capacities.

The epistemological nature of human endowment can be explored through the state of nature theory with the focus on self-interested individuals and the creation of states. [7] Human endowment is also inclusive in the theories of human nature exploring individuals' rational and social behaviours. [4] :xxvi,241

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Medieval Philosophers) Jean-Jacques Rousseau (painted portrait).jpg
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Medieval Philosophers)

History

In-depth analysis of human endowment is attributed to theories and perceptions of human evolution. [4] :xxvi,241

The biological and cultural evolution is an ongoing process that shapes similarities and distinctive human attributes. [8] :3 Biological and cultural evolution coexist to influence human activities. Biological evolution is determined by genes or hereditary, which naturally gives individuals the ability to speak the language of their associated communities. [8] :5 Cultural evolution is the process where beliefs and a community's way of living is passed down to generations which includes their spoken language. [8] :5

The state of nature by Rousseau offers an understanding of self-preservation as the main innate human capacity. [9] Natural human endowment is peoples' willingness to survive and enjoy life. This allows the existence of states which individuals have formulated in order to live peacefully and ensure their continual survival.

Aristotle (Medieval Philosopher) P Aristotle grey.png
Aristotle (Medieval Philosopher)

Aristotle's human nature focuses on rationality as an innate human capacity that enables them to form communities and states. [10] Aristotle shows the natural existence of communities and states due to individuals' innate capacities to live together. Living in communities reflects the differences between humans' innate abilities. This includes the innate abilities towards political participation between male and female. [11]

Human endowment is considered to be of divine nature according to Spinoza. [12] Divine nature is reference to God's influence on human actions. The natural capacities of people to realise what they need enables them to make reasonable decisions and act accordingly. Spinoza's idea of necessity as part of human endowment is connected to God or nature which is the only existing substance. [12]

Baruch Spinoza (Medieval Philosopher) Spinoza.jpg
Baruch Spinoza (Medieval Philosopher)

Stephen Covey's human endowment is divided into primary and secondary categories. Primary endowment includes; self-awareness, imagination, conscience, volition or will power. Secondary endowments are; abundance mentality, courage and consideration, creativity, and self-renewal. These endowments are explored through the stages of human life which are dependence, independence, and interdependence. [3] Covey's list of human endowment distinguishes between principles and values. Principles are external natural laws that determines the consequences of individual behaviour caused by their internal values. [3] Principles are attributes of acquired or learned human endowment while values are of innate human capacities.

Natural endowment

Endowment in the natural category refers to innate capacities of human beings which they are born with. [1]

Humans' instinct nature to preserve themselves is considered a natural endowment under Rousseau's state of nature theory. [9] Individuals without having to acquire any instinctual value have the ability of wanting security to ensure their survival. The natural capacities of individuals to thrive and survive stems unilaterally from human mind rather than a polity. Natural endowment includes individuals' natural rights that allow humans' to be rational without any form of law in place. [13] This differentiates natural endowment from social endowment.

Aristotle focuses on reason and mind as part of human natural endowment. [14] Individuals are born with the natural ability to think, which enables them to make rational decisions. Individuals, through their minds and reason, develop abilities which could become habits if they continue to be rational. Aristotle's political perceptions of human nature reflect the idea of unequal natural abilities between genders. [11] This is due to the level of authority individuals have in expressing their innate cognitive faculties.

Baruch Spinoza builds on individuals' natural impulses as innate capacities which is from the recognition of what is necessary and nature itself. [12] Humans natural capacities include the innate ability to realise what is necessary and act through reasoning and make decisions. This stems from humans' dependency as part of their innate capacities which cannot be separated from nature or God. [15] The social construction of communities and states is a result of individuals' realisation that living together in a civilised manner is necessary for survival. [6]

Stephen Covey's primary endowment includes; self-awareness or self-conscious and imagination as part of humans' natural endowment. Self-awareness or self-conscious is the innate capacity of human beings to be more sensitive of their environment with what they encounter and experience. [16] Individuals' have the natural ability to act reasonably towards certain situations as they know what the situation is and its consequences. Imagination is of individual minds where thoughts beyond real life occurrences and situations take place. [16] Individuals make sense of their environment and world through their natural ability to imagine beyond reality. [16]

Social endowment

Human endowment is social when they are acquired or learned from an environment. These learned characteristics varies between individuals and societies. [1]

Social endowment includes conscience as part of individuals' learned ability to distinguish between what is right and wrong. [16] This moral decision is a reflection of rules and laws in place to govern a certain group people or society. [6] Individuals develop conscience from their cultures or the way of life within their communities. This differentiates peoples' reactions to certain situations they encounter and experience. The uneven structures and material distribution of goods and services within societies determines individuals' conscience. [16] Individuals who are most vulnerable and make up most of the lower class in society develop a more self-motivated and determined conscience. [16] This social endowment is a reflection of individuals' environment and their corresponding response to it.

Social endowment emerges from these communal societies with embedded rules that govern people. The set of rules in place is a result of social endowment where individuals distinguishes between acceptable and inappropriate behaviour. [6]

The theory of human nature by Aristotle includes the philosophy of both natural and social human endowment. [14] Social endowment flows from the natural capacities of people like their ability to think and make rational decisions. The gathering of communities and establishing of states are a result of rational decisions people make. This reflects the idea that humans are rational social and political animals. [14] Individuals' social ability to think and make moral decisions allows them to live together in a polity. Living in a polity requires individuals to follow certain rules and way of life which becomes part of their social endowment. Sanctions are in place to correspond governing rules and ensure the maintenance of the polity. [6]

Related Research Articles

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature, from which values, thought by natural law's proponents to be intrinsic to human nature, can be deduced and applied independently of positive law. According to the theory of law called jusnaturalism, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason". Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political philosophy</span> Philosophy of governance and politics

Political philosophy or political theory is the philosophical study of government, addressing questions about the nature, scope, and legitimacy of public agents and institutions and the relationships between them. Its topics include politics, justice, liberty, property, rights, law, and the enforcement of laws by authority: what they are, if they are needed, what makes a government legitimate, what rights and freedoms it should protect, what form it should take, what the law is, and what duties citizens owe to a legitimate government, if any, and when it may be legitimately overthrown, if ever.

<i>Tabula rasa</i> Philosophical theory that individuals are born without innate knowledge

Tabula rasa is the idea of individuals being born empty of any built-in mental content, so that all knowledge comes from later perceptions or sensory experiences. Proponents typically form the extreme "nurture" side of the nature versus nurture debate, arguing that humans are born without any "natural" psychological traits and that all aspects of one's personality, social and emotional behaviour, knowledge, or sapience are afterwards imprinted by one's environment onto the mind as one would onto a wax tablet. This idea is the central view posited in the theory of knowledge known as empiricism. Empiricists disagree with the doctrines of innatism or rationalism, which hold that the mind is born already in possession of certain knowledge or rational capacity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social contract</span> Concept in political philosophy

In moral and political philosophy, the social contract is an idea, theory or model that usually, although not always, concerns the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual. Conceptualized in the Age of Enlightenment, it is a core concept of constitutionalism, while not necessarily convened and written down in a constituent assembly and constitution.

Reason is the capacity of applying logic consciously by drawing conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth. It is associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, religion, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a distinguishing ability possessed by humans. Reason is sometimes referred to as rationality.

In philosophy, rationalism is the epistemological view that "regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge" or "any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification", often in contrast to other possible sources of knowledge such as faith, tradition, or sensory experience. More formally, rationalism is defined as a methodology or a theory "in which the criterion of truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive".

Will, within philosophy, is a faculty of the mind. Will is important as one of the parts of the mind, along with reason and understanding. It is considered central to the field of ethics because of its role in enabling deliberate action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teleology</span> Thinking in terms of destiny or purpose

Teleology or finality is a branch of causality giving the reason or an explanation for something as a function of its end, its purpose, or its goal, as opposed to as a function of its cause. James Wood, in his Nuttall Encyclopaedia, explained the meaning of teleology as "the doctrine of final causes, particularly the argument for the being and character of God from the being and character of His works; that the end reveals His purpose from the beginning, the end being regarded as the thought of God at the beginning, or the universe viewed as the realisation of Him and His eternal purpose."

Human potential is the capacity for humans to improve themselves through studying, training, and practice, to reach the limit of their ability to develop aptitudes and skills. "Inherent within the notion of human potential is the belief that in reaching their full potential an individual will be able to lead a happy and more fulfilled life".

In philosophy, economics, and political science, the common good is either what is shared and beneficial for all or most members of a given community, or alternatively, what is achieved by citizenship, collective action, and active participation in the realm of politics and public service. The concept of the common good differs significantly among philosophical doctrines. Early conceptions of the common good were set out by Ancient Greek philosophers, including Aristotle and Plato. One understanding of the common good rooted in Aristotle's philosophy remains in common usage today, referring to what one contemporary scholar calls the "good proper to, and attainable only by, the community, yet individually shared by its members."

A need is dissatisfaction at a point of time and in a given context. Needs are distinguished from wants. In the case of a need, a deficiency causes a clear adverse outcome: a dysfunction or death. In other words, a need is something required for a safe, stable and healthy life while a want is a desire, wish or aspiration. When needs or wants are backed by purchasing power, they have the potential to become economic demands.

Agency is the capacity of an actor to act in a given environment. It is independent of the moral dimension, which is called moral agency.

Phronesis is a type of wisdom or intelligence concerned with practical action. It implies both good judgment and excellence of character and habits, and was a common topic of discussion in ancient Greek philosophy. Classical works about this topic are still influential today. In Aristotelian ethics, the concept was distinguished from other words for wisdom and intellectual virtues—such as episteme and sophia—because of its practical character. The traditional Latin translation is prudentia, which is the source of the English word "prudence".

<i>Discourse on Inequality</i> 1755 treatise by Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men, also commonly known as the "Second Discourse", is a 1755 treatise by philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, on the topic of social inequality and its origins. The work was written in 1754 as Rousseau's entry in a competition by the Academy of Dijon, and was published in 1755.

Moral agency is an individual's ability to make moral choices based on some notion of right and wrong and to be held accountable for these actions. A moral agent is "a being who is capable of acting with reference to right and wrong."

Human nature comprises the fundamental dispositions and characteristics—including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—that humans are said to have naturally. The term is often used to denote the essence of humankind, or what it 'means' to be human. This usage has proven to be controversial in that there is dispute as to whether or not such an essence actually exists.

Common sense is "knowledge, judgement, and taste which is more or less universal and which is held more or less without reflection or argument". As such, it is often considered to represent the basic level of sound practical judgement or knowledge of basic facts that any adult human being ought to possess. It is "common" in the sense of being shared by nearly all people. The everyday understanding of common sense is ultimately derived from historical philosophical discussions. Relevant terms from other languages used in such discussions include Latin sensus communis, Ancient Greek κοινὴ αἴσθησις, and French bon sens. However, these are not straightforward translations in all contexts, and in English different shades of meaning have developed. In philosophical and scientific contexts, since the Age of Enlightenment the term "common sense" has been used for rhetorical effect both approvingly and disapprovingly. On the one hand it has been a standard for good taste, good sense, and source of scientific and logical axioms. On the other hand it has been equated to conventional wisdom, vulgar prejudice, and superstition.

<i>Sources of the Self</i> 1989 work by Charles Taylor

Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity is a work of philosophy by Charles Taylor, published in 1989 by Harvard University Press. It is an attempt to articulate and to write a history of the "modern identity".

The philosophy of human rights attempts to examine the underlying basis of the concept of human rights and critically looks at its content and justification. Several theoretical approaches have been advanced to explain how and why the concept of human rights developed.

Epistemic democracy refers to a range of views in political science and philosophy which see the value of democracy as based, at least in part, on its ability to make good or correct decisions. Epistemic democrats believe that the legitimacy or justification of democratic government should not be exclusively based on the intrinsic value of its procedures and how they embody or express values such as fairness, equality, or freedom. Instead, they claim that a political system based on political equality can be expected to make good political decisions, and possibly decisions better than any alternative form of government .   

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Griffiths, Paul (2020), "The Distinction Between Innate and Acquired Characteristics", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2020-05-28
  2. Weisfeld, Glenn E. (1986). "Teaching about Sex Differences in Human Behavior and the Biological Approach in General". Politics and the Life Sciences. 5 (1): 36–43. doi:10.1017/S073093840000160X. ISSN   0730-9384. JSTOR   4235480. S2CID   142425188.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Covey, Stephen R. The 7 habits of highly effective people. ISBN   978-1-7971-1508-5. OCLC   1152892486.
  4. 1 2 3 Ward, Ann (2009). Matter and Form: from natural science to political philosophy. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN   978-0-7391-3568-6.
  5. Guorong, Yang. (2016). The mutual cultivation of self and things a contemporary Chinese philosophy of the meaning of being. Indiana University Press. OCLC   1066441578.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Forji George, Amin (2010). "The correlation between law and behaviour as pillars of human society". International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing. 6: 85+.
  7. Bertram, Christopher (2010-09-27). "Jean Jacques Rousseau".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. 1 2 3 Ehrlich, Paul (2000). Human Natures: Genes, Cultures, and the Human Prospect. Island Press: Island Press. p. 3. ISBN   1597262668.
  9. 1 2 Neumann, Harry (1976). "Philosophy and Freedom: An Interpretation of Rousseau's State of Nature". Journal of General Education. 27: 301–307. ProQuest   64032264 via Social Science Premium Collection.
  10. Everson, Stephen (1988). "Aristotle on the foundations of the state". Political Studies. XXXVI: 89–101. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1988.tb00218.x. S2CID   144587597. ProQuest   36898151 via Social Science Premium Collection.
  11. 1 2 Ward, Julie (2005). "Aristotle on Physics: Human Nature in the Ethics and Politics". Polis. 22 (2): 287–308. doi:10.1163/20512996-90000081. ProQuest   60522105 via Social Science Premium Collection.
  12. 1 2 3 Doomen, J. (2011). Spinozan Freedom. OCLC   1081515366.
  13. Grace, Eve Herausgeber. Kelly, Christopher 1950- Herausgeber. (2019). The Rousseauian mind. ISBN   978-0-429-02077-3. OCLC   1125186446.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  14. 1 2 3 Annas, Julia (1996). "Aristotle's Politics: A Symoposium: Aristotle on Human Nature and Political Virtue". The Review of Metaphysics. 49: 731–753.
  15. Garrett, Don. (2006). The Cambridge companion to Spinoza. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-00048-2. OCLC   723455248.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lin, Yi; Forrest, Bailey (2011-12-14), "Interaction Between Civilizations", Systemic Structure Behind Human Organizations, Springer New York, pp. 127–144, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2311-9_6, ISBN   978-1-4614-2310-2