Peter principle

Last updated

The cover of The Peter Principle (1970 Pan Books edition) Cover of The Peter Principle by Pan Books.jpeg
The cover of The Peter Principle (1970 Pan Books edition)

The Peter principle is a concept in management developed by Laurence J. Peter which observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence": employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a level at which they are no longer competent, as skills in one job do not necessarily translate to another. [1] [2]

Contents

The concept was explained in the 1969 book The Peter Principle (William Morrow and Company) by Laurence Peter and Raymond Hull. [3] Hull wrote the text, which was based on Peter's research. Peter and Hull intended the book to be satire, [4] but it became popular as it was seen to make a serious point about the shortcomings of how people are promoted within hierarchical organizations. The Peter principle has since been the subject of much commentary and research.

Summary

The Peter principle states that a person who is competent at their job will earn a promotion to a position that requires different skills. If the promoted person lacks the skills required for the new role, they will be incompetent at the new level, and will not be promoted again. [2] If the person is competent in the new role, they will be promoted again and will continue to be promoted until reaching a level at which they are incompetent. Being incompetent, the individual will not qualify for promotion again, and so will remain stuck at this final placement or Peter's plateau.

This outcome is inevitable, given enough time and enough positions in the hierarchy to which competent employees may be promoted. The Peter principle is therefore expressed as: "In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence." This leads to Peter's corollary: "In time, every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out its duties." Hull calls the study of how hierarchies work hierarchiology. [3] : 22, 24, 148 

The Peter Principle

Laurence J. Peter's research led to the formulation of the Peter Principle well before publishing his findings.

Eventually, to elucidate his observations about hierarchies, Peter worked with Raymond Hull to develop a book, The Peter Principle, which was published by William Morrow and Company in 1969. As such, the principle is named for Peter because, although Hull actually wrote almost all of the book's text, it is a summary of Peter's research. [5]

Summary

In the first two chapters, Peter and Hull give various examples of the Peter principle in action. In each case, the higher position required skills that were not required at the level immediately below. For example, a competent school teacher may make a competent assistant principal, but then go on to be an incompetent principal. The teacher was competent at educating children, and as assistant principal, he was good at dealing with parents and other teachers, but as principal, he was poor at maintaining good relations with the school board and the superintendent. [3] : 27–9 

In chapter 3, Peter and Hull discuss apparent exceptions to this principle and then debunk them. One of these illusory exceptions is when someone who is incompetent is still promoted anyway—they coin the phrase "percussive sublimation" for this phenomenon of being "kicked upstairs" (cf. Dilbert principle). However, it is only a pseudo-promotion: a move from one unproductive position to another. This improves staff morale, as other employees believe that they too can be promoted again. [3] : 32–3  Another pseudo-promotion is the "lateral arabesque": when a person is moved out of the way and given a longer job title. [3] : 34–5 

While incompetence is merely a barrier to further promotion, "super-incompetence" is grounds for dismissal, as is "super-competence". In both cases, "they tend to disrupt the hierarchy." [3] : 41  One specific example of a super-competent employee is a teacher of children with special needs: they were so effective at educating the children that, after a year, they exceeded all expectations at reading and arithmetic, but the teacher was still fired because they had neglected to devote enough time to bead-stringing and finger-painting. [3] : 39 

Chapters 4 and 5 deal with the two methods of achieving promotion: "push" and "pull". "Push" refers to the employee's own efforts, such as working hard and taking courses for self-improvement. This is usually not very effective due to the seniority factor: the next level up is often fully occupied, blocking the path to promotion. [3] : 52  "Pull", on the other hand, is far more effective and refers to accelerated promotion brought about by the efforts of an employee's mentors or patrons. [3] : 48–51  [6]

Chapter 6 explains why "good followers do not become good leaders." [3] : 60  In chapter 7, Peter and Hull describe the effect of the Peter principle in politics and government. Chapter 8, titled "Hints and Foreshadowings", discusses the work of earlier writers on the subject of incompetence, such as Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, and Alexander Pope.

Chapter 9 explains that, once employees have reached their level of incompetence, they always lack insight into their situation. Peter and Hull go on to explain why aptitude tests do not work and are actually counter-productive. [3] : 84–6  Finally, they describe "summit competence": when someone reaches the highest level in their organization and yet is still competent at that level. This is only because there were not enough ranks in the hierarchy, or because they did not have time to reach a level of incompetence. Such people often seek a level of incompetence in another hierarchy; this is known as "compulsive incompetence". For example, Socrates was an outstanding teacher but a terrible defence attorney. [3] : 88–9 

Chapter 10 explains why attempts to assist an incompetent employee by promoting another employee to act as their assistant does not work: "Incompetence plus incompetence equals incompetence" (italics in original). [3] : 93 

Chapters 11 and 12 describe the various medical and psychological manifestations of stress that may come as result of someone reaching their level of incompetence, as well as other symptoms such as certain characteristic habits of speech or behaviour.

Chapter 13 considers whether it is possible for an employee who has reached their level of incompetence to be happy and healthy once they get there: the answer is no if the person realizes their true situation, and yes if the person does not. [3] : 111–2 

Various ways of avoiding promotion to the final level are described in chapter 14. Attempting to refuse an offered promotion is ill-advised and is only practicable if the employee is not married and has no one else to answer to. Generally, it is better to avoid being considered for promotion in the first place, by pretending to be incompetent while one is actually still employed at a level of competence. This is "Creative Incompetence," for which several examples of successful techniques are given. It works best if the chosen field of incompetence does not actually impair one's work. [3] : 125 

The concluding chapter applies Peter's Principle to the entire human species at an evolutionary level and asks whether humanity can survive in the long run, or will it become extinct upon reaching its level of incompetence as technology advances.

Other commenters made observations similar to the Peter principle long before Peter's research. Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's 1763 play Minna von Barnhelm features an army sergeant who shuns the opportunity to move up in the ranks, saying "I am a good sergeant; I might easily make a bad captain, and certainly an even worse general. One knows from experience." Similarly, Carl von Clausewitz (1780–1831) wrote that "there is nothing more common than to hear of men losing their energy on being raised to a higher position, to which they do not feel themselves equal." [7] Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset (1883–1955) virtually enunciated the Peter principle in 1910, "All public employees should be demoted to their immediately lower level, as they have been promoted until turning incompetent." [7] [8] [9]

A number of scholars have engaged in research interpreting the Peter principle and its effects. In 2000, Edward Lazear explored two possible explanations for the phenomenon. First is the idea that employees work harder to gain a promotion, and then slack off once it is achieved. The other is that it is a statistical process: workers who are promoted have passed a particular benchmark of productivity based on factors that cannot necessarily be replicated in their new role, leading to a Peter principle situation. Lazear concluded that the former explanation only occurs under particular compensation structures, whereas the latter always holds up. [10]

Alessandro Pluchino, Andrea Rapisarda, and Cesare Garofalo (2010) used an agent-based modelling approach to simulate the promotion of employees in a system where the Peter principle is assumed to be true. They found that the best way to improve efficiency in an enterprise is to promote people randomly, or to shortlist the best and the worst performer in a given group, from which the person to be promoted is then selected randomly. [11] For this work, they won the 2010 edition of the parody Ig Nobel Prize in management science. [12] Later work has shown that firms that follow the Peter Principle may be disadvantaged, as they may be overtaken by competitors, or may produce smaller revenues and profits; [13] as well why success most often is a result of luck rather than talent—work which earned Pluchino and Rapisarda a second Ig Nobel Prize in 2022. [14]

In 2018, professors Alan Benson, Danielle Li, and Kelly Shue analyzed sales workers' performance and promotion practices at 214 American businesses to test the veracity of the Peter principle. They found that these companies tended to promote employees to a management position based on their performance in their previous position, rather than based on managerial potential. Consistent with the Peter principle, the researchers found that high performing sales employees were likelier to be promoted, and that they were likelier to perform poorly as managers, leading to considerable costs to the businesses. [15] [16] [2]

The Peter principle inspired Scott Adams, creator of the comic strip Dilbert , to develop a similar concept, the Dilbert principle. The Dilbert principle holds that incompetent employees are promoted to management positions to get them out of the workflow. The idea was explained by Adams in his 1996 business book The Dilbert Principle, and it has since been analyzed alongside the Peter principle. João Ricardo Faria wrote that the Dilbert principle is "a sub-optimal version of the Peter principle," and leads to even lower profitability than the Peter principle. [17]

Response by organizations

Companies and organizations shaped their policies to contend with the Peter principle. Lazear stated that some companies expect that productivity will "regress to the mean" following promotion in their hiring and promotion practices. [10] Other companies have adopted "up or out" strategies, such as the Cravath System, in which employees who do not advance are periodically fired. The Cravath System was developed at the law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, which made a practice of hiring chiefly recent law graduates, promoting internally and firing employees who do not perform at the required level. [18] Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths have suggested the additive increase/multiplicative decrease algorithm as a solution to the Peter principle less severe than firing employees who fail to advance. They propose a dynamic hierarchy in which employees are regularly either promoted or reassigned to a lower level so that any worker who is promoted to their point of failure is soon moved to an area where they are productive. [19]

The Peter Principle is a British television sitcom broadcast by the BBC between 1995 and 2000, featuring Jim Broadbent as an incompetent bank manager named Peter, in an apparent demonstration of the principle.

The Incompetence Opera [20] is a 16-minute mini-opera that premiered at the satirical Ig Nobel Prize ceremony in 2017, [21] described as "a musical encounter with the Peter principle and the Dunning–Kruger effect". [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Dilbert</i> American comic strip

Dilbert is an American comic strip written and illustrated by Scott Adams, first published on April 16, 1989. It is known for its satirical office humor about a white-collar, micromanaged office with engineer Dilbert as the title character. It has led to dozens of books, an animated television series, a video game, and hundreds of themed merchandise items. Dilbert Future and The Joy of Work are among the best-selling books in the series. In 1997, Adams received the National Cartoonists Society Reuben Award and the Newspaper Comic Strip Award for his work. Dilbert appears online and as of 2013 was published daily in 2,000 newspapers in 65 countries and 25 languages.

A hierarchical organization or hierarchical organisation is an organizational structure where every entity in the organization, except one, is subordinate to a single other entity. This arrangement is a form of hierarchy. In an organization, this hierarchy usually consists of a singular/group of power at the top with subsequent levels of power beneath them. This is the dominant mode of organization among large organizations; most corporations, governments, criminal enterprises, and organized religions are hierarchical organizations with different levels of management power or authority. For example, the broad, top-level overview of the hierarchy of the Catholic Church consists of the Pope, then the Cardinals, then the Archbishops, and so on. Another example is the hierarchy between the four castes in the Hindu caste system, which arises from the religious belief "that each is derived from a different part of the creator God’s (Brahma) body, descending from the head downwards."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organization</span> Social entity established to meet needs or pursue goals

An organization or organisation, is an entity—such as a company, or corporation or an institution, or an association—comprising one or more people and having a particular purpose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dilbert principle</span> Satirical observation by Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams

The Dilbert principle is a satirical concept of management developed by Scott Adams, creator of the comic strip Dilbert, which states that companies tend to promote incompetent employees to management to minimize their ability to harm productivity. The Dilbert principle is inspired by the Peter principle, which is that employees are promoted based on success until they attain their "level of incompetence" and are no longer successful. By the Dilbert principle, employees who were never competent are promoted to management to limit the damage they can do. Adams first explained the principle in a 1995 Wall Street Journal article, and elaborated upon it in his humorous 1996 book The Dilbert Principle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laurence J. Peter</span> Canadian educator (1919–1990)

Laurence Johnston Peter was a Canadian educator and "hierarchiologist" who is best known to the general public for the formulation of the Peter principle.

The merit system is the process of promoting and hiring government employees based on their ability to perform a job, rather than on their political connections. It is the opposite of the spoils system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personnel economics</span> Economics of labour within companies

Personnel economics has been defined as "the application of economic and mathematical approaches and econometric and statistical methods to traditional questions in human resources management". It is an area of applied micro labor economics, but there are a few key distinctions. One distinction, not always clearcut, is that studies in personnel economics deal with the personnel management within firms, and thus internal labor markets, while those in labor economics deal with labor markets as such, whether external or internal. In addition, personnel economics deals with issues related to both managerial-supervisory and non-supervisory workers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Promotion (rank)</span>

A promotion is the advancement of an employee's rank or position in an organizational hierarchy system. Promotion may be an employee's reward for good performance, i.e., positive appraisal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dunning–Kruger effect</span> Cognitive bias about ones own skill

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities. It was first described by David Dunning and Justin Kruger in 1999. Some researchers also include the opposite effect for high performers: their tendency to underestimate their skills. In popular culture, the Dunning–Kruger effect is often misunderstood as a claim about general overconfidence of people with low intelligence instead of specific overconfidence of people unskilled at a particular task.

The Peter Principle is a British television sitcom. It was produced by Hat Trick Productions, and first broadcast by the BBC between 1995 and 2000 and by PBS in the United States. The series is set in the Aldbridge branch of the fictional County and Provincial Bank, featuring Jim Broadbent as the title character, its inept manager, and Claire Skinner, Daniel Flynn, Stephen Moore and David Schneider as his employees. The programme takes its name from the Peter Principle, a concept in management theory that states that workers are promoted to their level of incompetence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geoffrey Miller (psychologist)</span> American evolutionary psychologist (born 1965)

Geoffrey Franklin Miller is an American evolutionary psychologist, author, and associate professor of psychology at the University of New Mexico. He is known for his research on sexual selection in human evolution.

Competence is the set of demonstrable personal characteristics or KSAOs that enable job performance at a high level with consistency and minimal difficulty. Competency in human resources is an organizational criterion for excellence that encompasses the behaviors, experience, knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable employees to perform their roles effectively and reliably.

Negative selection is a political process that occurs especially in rigid hierarchies, most notably dictatorships, but also to lesser degrees in such settings as corporations or electoral politics.

In the United States criminal justice system, a competency evaluation is an assessment of the ability of a defendant to understand and rationally participate in a court process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andre Geim</span> Russian-born Dutch–British physicist (born 1958)

Sir Andre Konstantin Geim is a Russian-born Dutch–British physicist working in England in the School of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manchester.

Up or out, also known as a tenure or partnership system, is the requirement for members of a hierarchical organization to achieve a certain rank within a certain period of time. If they fail to do so, they must leave the organization.

<i>Putts Law and the Successful Technocrat</i> Book

Putt's Law and the Successful Technocrat is a book, credited to the pseudonym Archibald Putt, published in 1981. An updated edition, subtitled How to Win in the Information Age, was published by Wiley-IEEE Press in 2006. The book is based upon a series of articles published in Research/Development Magazine in 1976 and 1977.

Role congruity theory proposes that a group will be positively evaluated when its characteristics are recognized as aligning with that group's typical social roles. Conversely, the stereotype fit hypothesis suggests that group members will experience discrimination in different social roles or positions to the extent that their group stereotypically does not have characteristics associated with success in the position. For instance, women may not be considered a good fit for a managerial position if being aggressive is seen as a characteristic of a successful manager. Due to stereotype fit, men may be considered more qualified for the position and are not only more likely to be hired, but are also more likely to be promoted as well.

Parkinson's law can refer to either of two observations, published in 1955 by the naval historian C. Northcote Parkinson as an essay in The Economist:

References

  1. ↑ Flynn, Dan (November 8, 1980). "Peter of the incompetency principle speaks of presidents, now and soon". Lewiston Morning Tribune. (Idaho). p. 2B.
  2. 1 2 3 Hayes, Adam (August 21, 2020). "Peter Principle: What You Need to Know". Investopedia. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Peter, Laurence J., and Raymond Hull. [1969] 1970. The Peter Principle. Pan Books.
  4. ↑ Barron, James (January 15, 1990). "Laurence J. Peter Is Dead at 70; His 'Principle' Satirized Business". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved November 26, 2019.
  5. ↑ Hull, in his introduction to the book.
  6. ↑ "The combined Pull of several Patrons is the sum of their separate Pulls multiplied by the number of Patrons." (Peter and Hull, p. 51)
  7. 1 2 Grudin, Jonathan (January–February 2016). "The Rise of Incompetence". Interactions. 23 (1): 6–7. doi: 10.1145/2854002 .
  8. ↑ "En el umbral de la incompetencia". La Opinión (in Spanish). Retrieved November 30, 2013.
  9. ↑ Christian, Brian; Griffiths, Tom (2016). Algorithms to Live By. Henry Holt and Company. p. 219. ISBN   978-1627790376.
  10. 1 2 Lazear, Edward P. (October 12, 2000). "The Peter Principle: Promotions and Declining Productivity" (PDF). Hoover Institution and Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 19, 2018. Retrieved March 23, 2009.
  11. ↑ Pluchino, Alessandro; Rapisarda, Andrea; Garofalo, Cesare (2010). "The Peter Principle Revisited: A Computational Study". Physica A . 389 (3): 467–472. arXiv: 0907.0455 . Bibcode:2010PhyA..389..467P. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.09.045. S2CID   9077554.
  12. ↑ "The 2010 Ig Nobel Prize Winners" (PDF). Annals of Improbable Research . 16 (6): 10–13. 2010.
  13. ↑ Udhayanan, Prateksha; Mishra, Swasti; Rao, Shrisha (2021). "Firm dynamics and employee performance management in duopoly markets". Physica A . 583 (126298): 126298. Bibcode:2021PhyA..58326298U. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126298. S2CID   238731817.
  14. ↑ "Past Ig Winners". improbable.com. August 1, 2006. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
  15. ↑ Benson, Alan; Li, Danielle; Shue, Kelly (February 2018). "Promotions and the Peter Principle". NBER Working Paper. 24343: 1–54. doi: 10.3386/w24343 . Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  16. ↑ Benson, Alan, Danielle Li, and Kelly Shue. 2019 April 24. "Promotions and the Peter Principle." Vox EU .
  17. ↑ Faria, João Ricardo (January 2000). "An Economic Analysis of the Peter and Dilbert Principles" (PDF). UTS Working Papers. 101: 13–14. ISSN   1036-7373 . Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  18. ↑ "Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP". Cravath - The System’s History. Retrieved September 5, 2023.
  19. ↑ Christian, Brian; Griffiths, Tom (2016). Algorithms to Live By. Henry Holt and Company. pp. 219–220. ISBN   978-1627790376.
  20. ↑ The Incompetence Opera (video (16')). Improbable Research. December 29, 2017 – via YouTube.
  21. ↑ "The 27th First Annual Ig® Nobel Prize Ceremony & Lectures". September 14, 2017. Archived from the original on January 19, 2018.
  22. ↑ "Preview: "The Incompetence Opera"". Improbable Research. August 30, 2017. Archived from the original on January 19, 2018.

Bibliography

Listen to this article (10 minutes)
Sound-icon.svg
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 3 October 2019 (2019-10-03), and does not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help  · More spoken articles)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.