Planned unit development

Last updated

A planned unit development (PUD) is a type of flexible, non-Euclidean zoning device that redefines the land uses allowed within a stated land area. PUDs consist of unitary site plans that promote the creation of open spaces, mixed-use housing and land uses, environmental preservation and sustainability, and development flexibility. [1] Areas rezoned as PUDs include building developments, designed groupings of both varied and compatible land uses—such as housing, recreation, commercial centers, and industrial parks—within one contained development or subdivision. [2] Developed areas vary in size and by zoned uses, such as industrial, commercial, and residential. [3] :2 Other types of similar zoning devices include floating zones, overlay zones, special district zoning, performance-based codes, and transferable development rights. [4] :2

Contents

History

The conceptual origins of PUDs date back to the 1926 enactment of the Model Planning Enabling Act of 1925 by the Committee on the Regional Plan of New York, which allowed for the decisions of planning boards and commissions to precede decisions required by local zoning regulations. [5] :170 Specifically, Section 12 of the Model Planning Enabling Act authorized planning boards and commissions to reasonably modify or change development plans and limited average population density and total land area covered by buildings. [6] Similarly, Sections 14 and 15 of the Standard City Planning Enabling Act of 1928 allowed planning commissions to authorize PUDs, upon an agreement between the government and developers on the PUD's design principles and its impact to both the surrounding community and economy. [6]

The physical origins of PUDs are rooted in the increased suburbanization of the mid-twentieth century, during which the oldest forms of PUDs in America appeared shortly after World War II in the Levittown and Park Forest developments. [7] :703 Increased implementation of PUDs arose in response to both the lack of aesthetic variation among suburban homes and the increasing need for higher suburban density to accommodate rising population sizes. [3] :2 PUDs resolved the problems of large-scale, suburban development in multiple, separate land uses were efficiently combined, preserving valuable open space and suburban aesthetics within specific site parameters limitations. [8] :80 The first zoning evidence of PUD was created by Prince George's County, Maryland in 1949, in which the developmental unit consisted of multiple land uses, in contrast to the county's previous commitment to single-land use Euclidean zoning. [9]

The usage of PUDs in new American communities have been, in part, the result of some international influence; British towns, like Reston, England, in the 1950s attempted to increase their economic base through the integration of industrial elements into the area. [7] :702 Though American new communities had to attract industry post-development of residential sectors, American new communities had similar economic needs to these British towns and, consequently, used PUDS to increase the percent of allowed industrial acreage relative to residential and nonresidential acreage. [7] :702

Current definitions

PUD is a means of land regulation that promotes large scale, site-specific, mixed-use land development. PUDs are a very flexible form of zoning, as compared to Euclidean zoning, in that PUDs promotes innovative and creative design, can promote environmental conservation and affordable housing, clustering and increased density. [3] :3 Where appropriate, this type of development promotes:

Frequently, PUDs take on a variety of forms ranging from small clusters of houses combined with open spaces to new and developing towns with thousands of residents and various land uses.

Mixtures of land uses

PUDs are in direct contradiction to the single-type zoning that has traditionally underscored zoning in the United States since the Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. decision. [10] Within PUDs, zoning becomes much more integrated with multiple land uses and districts being placed on adjacent land parcels. [8] :75 The enactment of the Standard Zoning Enabling Act (SZEA) reinforced that density is considered a regulatory priority, further supporting the development of PUDs through the integration of varying lot sizes, varied building uses, and the mixture of different types of housing. [11] :553

PUDS combine residential and non-residential uses—like offices, commercial stores, and other services—and attracts a diversified community. [11] :550 Notably, sidewalks and streets of PUDs tend to be more active and safer, both at day and night, and experiences reduced congestion during peak times. [11] :550 Detailed plans and review processes are required to approve development of PUDs, due to the nature of mixing residential and non-residential uses into land areas previously only allowed for single-use; approving a PUD essentially requires a legal rezoning, in which variances and conditional use permits must be cleared by a planning board or commission with regards to the municipality's comprehensive plan. [4] :20

Maintenance of common areas

PUD provisions include consideration of the ability of the owners, or related stakeholders, to ensure the maintenance of common, public areas; such provisions include related costs, income level and interests of stakeholders, and the nature of both the common area and surrounding developments. [12] Throughout the development process, which is already scheduled and preapproved as part of the PUD application process, maintenance of common areas can be sustained through calculated servicing of inroads. [8] :76 Post-development, governing documents of homeowners associations within PUDs often delegate most of the maintenance responsibilities to the owners, assuming the least amount of responsibility possible. [13]

Design principles

Minimum parcel size

The minimum parcel size requirement can be in regards to either dwelling units or acres and can vary depending on both the type and location of a development. [7] :705 Given that minimum parcel sizes are a factor rarely necessary for project approval, maximum density requirements are more often used instead, focusing on either a maximum number of units per acre or a minimum lot acre per each dwelling unit. [7] :705

Uses permitted

Uses permitted is determined by allotting certain percentages of land use to residential, commercial, and industrial uses. [7] :705 Oftentimes, the amount allotted is dependent on the percentage of residential uses relative to non-residential uses within a defined area. [7] :705

Density

Given that PUDs focus on integrating mixed uses into a specified area, density is calculated based on the Federal Housing Act's Land Use Intensity (LUI) rating, which encompasses floor area, open space, livability, and recreational spaces within a single, numerical rating. [8] :89

Houses and placement of houses

Houses in PUDS often include access to a large, shared open space surrounding the house, as well as a smaller, private yard. [14] Clustered residential homes and buildings also provides homeowners with lower prices, in the form of lower infrastructural costs from shorter streets and by offering a mix of single-family, two-family, multiple-family housing. [14] PUDs can be considered a legal alternative to large lot, single-family zoning for how the land area can increase residential housing available while maintaining a small impact on local property taxes. [7] :702 Homes can be placed next to commercial and office land uses, while ensuring the preservation of other areas. [1] Homes, however, often visually feature garages instead of front porches, as they are placed in the periphery, relative to small strip malls created through other PUD initiatives. [1]

Size considerations

Smaller-sized PUDs, generally less than 250 acres, can promote the mixed-use of the development, but, because they are too small to influence nearby development, can contribute to sprawl in nearby peripheral and rural areas. [8] :86 In smaller PUDs, offering shopping facilities for only the residents may not be sustainable or viable for the development. [8] :88 Mid-sized PUDs, generally greater than 250 acres but less than 1000 acres, can maintain a balance between developmental influence to nearby areas, while still maintaining adequate cash flow requirements. [8] :86 Moderately-sized PUDs also contribute to the development of commercial highways and residential areas, which can increase the ability of smaller-areas of land being more efficiently developed or used. [7] :702 Larger-sized PUDs, generally greater than 1000 acres, can control sprawl-related issues, yet may also strain the management capacity of local developers. [8] :87

Usable, public open space

There are multiple provisions PUDs must include in regards to available open spaces, which include, upon conditional approval, those concerning quantity, location, and maintenance of public areas. [7] :707 Approval for such provisions can be satisfied by one of the following: satisfying a minimum acreage requirement relative to a specific number of dwelling units or a direct percentage of gross acreage; approval from a planning board on the proposed location of the public, open space; or cosigned maintenance agreements between residents —regardless of whether it be by a municipality or an organized residential community, like a homeowner' association or a community trust. [7] :707–708 The requirement of these aforementioned revisions is to ensure that open, public land, facilities, amenities, and necessities are well-kept for ease of public use and accessibility. [8] :92

Streets

Street patterns can be used to change the neighborhood character of a residential community, particularly by allowing developers to flexibly arrange buildings without having to adhere to non-PUD zoning regulations. [15] Wide, curvilinear, and cul-de-sac street patterns are examples. [1] The usage of these street, round street patterns allow developers to cluster buildings and maximize available open space. [16] Existing street and block patterns, historic preservation, and reservation of ground-floor streetfronts for non-residential, commercial uses are also considered when a community approves a PUD. [11] :556

Combining design features

The flexibility to include multiple amenities—like utilities, recreational facilities, schools, and parks—within a development unit is representative of how untraditional, Euclidean zoning practices can increase the mixed-use capability of a given piece of land. [8] :76 PUD project plans require a balance of residential, such as single-family homes and apartments, and non-residential requirements, ensuring that interacting individuals and vehicles are able to safely, and conveniently, navigate the varied buildings, spaces, and streets of PUDs. [8] :75 Ownership and responsibility of such PUDs may be either public or private. [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smart growth</span> Urban planning philosophy

Smart growth is an urban planning and transportation theory that concentrates growth in compact walkable urban centers to avoid sprawl. It also advocates compact, transit-oriented, walkable, bicycle-friendly land use, including neighborhood schools, complete streets, and mixed-use development with a range of housing choices. The term "smart growth" is particularly used in North America. In Europe and particularly the UK, the terms "compact city", "urban densification" or "urban intensification" have often been used to describe similar concepts, which have influenced government planning policies in the UK, the Netherlands and several other European countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zoning</span> Government policy allowing certain uses of land in different places

Zoning is a method of urban planning in which a municipality or other tier of government divides land into areas called zones, each of which has a set of regulations for new development that differs from other zones. Zones may be defined for a single use, they may combine several compatible activities by use, or in the case of form-based zoning, the differing regulations may govern the density, size and shape of allowed buildings whatever their use. The planning rules for each zone determine whether planning permission for a given development may be granted. Zoning may specify a variety of outright and conditional uses of land. It may indicate the size and dimensions of lots that land may be subdivided into, or the form and scale of buildings. These guidelines are set in order to guide urban growth and development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mettawa, Illinois</span> Village in Illinois, United States

Mettawa is a village in Lake County, Illinois, United States. Per the 2020 census, the population was 533. The village maintains trails for pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian usage. Five forest preserves of the Lake County Forest Preserve District are located within village boundaries.

Growth management, in the United States, is a set of techniques used by the government to ensure that as the population grows that there are services available to meet their demands. Growth management goes beyond traditional land use planning, zoning and subdivision controls in both the characteristics of development influenced and the scope of government powers used. These are not necessarily only government services. Other demands such as the protection of natural spaces, sufficient and affordable housing, delivery of utilities, preservation of buildings and places of historical value, and sufficient places for the conduct of business are also considered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Residential area</span> Land use in which housing predominates, as opposed to industrial and commercial areas

A residential area is a land used in which housing predominates, as opposed to industrial and commercial areas.

The urban-to-ruraltransect is an urban planning model created by the New Urbanist Andrés Duany. The transect defines a series of zones that transition from sparse rural farmhouses to the dense urban core. Each zone is fractal in that it contains a similar transition from the edge to the center of the neighborhood. The transect is an important part of the New Urbanism and smart growth movements. Duany's firm DPZ has embodied the transect philosophy into their SmartCode generic planning code for municipal ordinances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mixed-use development</span> Type of urban development strategy

Mixed use is a type of urban development, urban design, urban planning and/or a zoning classification that blends multiple uses, such as residential, commercial, cultural, institutional, or entertainment, into one space, where those functions are to some degree physically and functionally integrated, and that provides pedestrian connections. Mixed-use development may be applied to a single building, a block or neighborhood, or in zoning policy across an entire city or other administrative unit. These projects may be completed by a private developer, (quasi-) governmental agency, or a combination thereof. A mixed-use development may be a new construction, reuse of an existing building or brownfield site, or a combination.

Build-out is an urban planner’s estimate of the amount and location of potential development for an area. Sometimes called a "lot-yield analysis", build-out is one step of the land use planning process. Evaluation of potential development impacts begins with a build-out analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secondary suite</span> Dwelling on a property separated from the main home

Secondary suites are self-contained apartments, cottages, or small residential units, that are located on a property that has a separate main, single-family home, duplex, or other residential unit. In some cases, the ADU or in-law is attached to the principal dwelling or is an entirely separate unit, located above a garage or in the backyard on the same property. In British English the term annex or granny annex is used instead. Reasons for wanting to add a secondary suite to a property may be to receive additional income, provide social and personal support to a family member, or obtain greater security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Car dependency</span> Concept that city layouts favor automobiles over other modes of transportation

Car dependency is the concept that some city layouts cause cars to be favoured over alternate forms of transportation, such as bicycles, public transit, and walking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medium-density housing</span>

Medium-density housing is a term used within urban planning and academic literature to refer to a category of residential development that falls between detached suburban housing and large multi-story buildings. There is no singular definition of medium-density housing as its precise definition tends to vary between jurisdiction. Scholars however, have found that medium density housing ranges from about 25 to 80 dwellings per hectare, although most commonly sits around 30 and 40 dwellings/hectare. Typical examples of medium-density housing include duplexes, triplexes, townhouses, row homes, detached homes with garden suites, and walk-up apartment buildings.

SouthField is a form-based code planned community located on the former South Weymouth Naval Air Station in South Weymouth, Massachusetts. It is a 1,400-acre (6 km2) site 12 miles (19 km) south of Boston that overlaps three towns: Weymouth, Abington, and Rockland. Developed by LNR Property Corporation, SouthField will contain 2,855 housing units and up to 2,000,000 square feet (186,000 m2) that include single-family homes, apartments, and townhouses. The site will also have up to 1.7 million square feet of commercial development, a 45-acre recreational facility, an 18-hole golf course, walking trails and 1,000 acres of undeveloped land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zoning in the United States</span>

In the United States, zoning includes various land use laws falling under the police power rights of state governments and local governments to exercise authority over privately owned real property. Zoning laws in major cities originated with the Los Angeles zoning ordinances of 1904 and the New York City 1916 Zoning Resolution. Early zoning regulations were in some cases motivated by racism and classism, particularly with regard to those mandating single-family housing. Zoning ordinances did not allow African-Americans moving into or using residences that were occupied by majority whites due to the fact that their presence would decrease the value of home. The constitutionality of zoning ordinances was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co. in 1926.

A residential cluster development, or open space development, is the grouping of residential properties on a development site to use the extra land as open space, recreation or agriculture. It is increasingly becoming popular in subdivision development because it allows the developer to spend much less on land and obtain much the same price per unit as for detached houses. The shared garden areas can be a source of conflict, however. Claimed advantages include more green/public space, closer community, and an optimal storm water management. Cluster development often encounters planning objections.

Exclusionary zoning is the use of zoning ordinances to exclude certain types of land uses from a given community, especially to regulate racial and economic diversity. In the United States, exclusionary zoning ordinances are standard in almost all communities. Exclusionary zoning was introduced in the early 1900s, typically to prevent racial and ethnic minorities from moving into middle- and upper-class neighborhoods. Municipalities use zoning to limit the supply of available housing units, such as by prohibiting multi-family residential dwellings or setting minimum lot size requirements. These ordinances raise costs, making it less likely that lower-income groups will move in. Development fees for variance, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy, a filing (legal) cost, special permits and planned-unit development applications for new housing also raise prices to levels inaccessible for lower income people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">East Garrison, California</span> Unincorporated community in California, United States

East Garrison planned community is in an unincorporated community in Monterey County, California. It is located on Reservation Road east of Marina and west of the Salinas River on the former Fort Ord. East Garrison is part of Monterey County's Fourth District and, as of January 5, 2021, is represented by Supervisor Wendy Root Askew.

East Riverside-Oltorf is a neighborhood in Austin, Texas, located southeast of the city's urban core. The East Riverside, Parker Lane, and Pleasant Valley neighborhoods together form the East Riverside-Oltorf Combined Neighborhood Planning Area. The region is bounded on the north by Lake Lady Bird, to the east by Grove Boulevard and the Montopolis neighborhood, Texas State Highway 71 to the south, and Interstate 35 and South River City to the west.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sunset Esplanade</span> Shopping mall in Oregon, United States

The Sunset Esplanade is an outdoor shopping center located in the southeast part of Hillsboro, in the U.S. state of Oregon. Opened in 1989, the center is along Tualatin Valley Highway at Minter Bridge Road and includes about five anchor tenants and about thirty other tenants in a complex with about 363,000 square feet (33,700 m2) of space. Neighbors opposed the center when it was proposed, due to concerns over increased traffic and how it would blend with existing residential neighborhoods. After appeals to the Hillsboro City Council and state land use board, the $23 million project received approval almost two years after first proposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Missing middle housing</span>

Missing middle housing is a term which describes a range of multi-family or clustered housing types that are compatible in scale with single-family or transitional neighborhoods. It is usually used to describe a phenomenon in Canada and the United States, and those countries which have sought to replicate their style of urban planning, which lacks this type of medium-density housing due to car dependant suburban sprawl. Missing middle housing is intended to meet the demand for walkable neighborhoods, respond to changing demographics, and provide housing at different price points. The term "missing middle" is meant to describe housing types that were common in the pre-WWII United States such as duplexes, rowhouses, and courtyard apartments but are now less common and, therefore, "missing". Rather than focusing on the number of units in a structure, missing middle housing emphasizes building at a human scale and heights that are appropriate for single-family neighborhoods or transitional neighborhoods. After the introduction of the term in 2010, the concept has been applied in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Easton Park</span> Neighborhood in Austin, Texas, United States

Easton Park, also referred to as the Pilot Knob planned unit development, is a 2,214-acre (896 ha) Planned unit development (PUD) in the southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas, United States. The master-planned community is currently being developed within the Pilot Knob MUD which had been under review since 2012.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Rohe, William (2009). "From Local to Global: One Hundred Years of Neighborhood Planning". Journal of the American Planning Association. 75 (2): 224. doi:10.1080/01944360902751077. S2CID   154967605.
  2. Whittemore, Andrew (2014). "The New Communalism: The Unrealized Mid-Twentieth Century Vision of Planned Unit Development". Journal of Planning History. 14 (3): 1–16. doi:10.1177/1538513214553394. S2CID   141600504 . Retrieved 28 September 2021. Closed Access logo transparent.svg
  3. 1 2 3 4 David, Nina (2009). "The Role of the Development Management Framework in the Implementation of Flexible Planning Tools: Insights from a Tale of a Local Planned Unit Development Project". Journal of Planning Education and Research.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gajjar, Niti A. (2007). Evaluation of Form Based Zoning: A Zoning Tool for the Design of Built Environment (Master's thesis). University of Cincinnati. Retrieved 2022-12-05.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Callies, David; Freilich, Robert; Ross-Saxer, Shelley (1994). Land Use (7 ed.). West Academic Publishing. ISBN   978-1-63459-687-9.
  6. 1 2 Ahrens, Clifford (Winter 1970). "Planned Unit Development". Missouri Law Review (17 ed.). 35 (1): 28–29.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Sternlieb, George; Burchell, Robert; Hughes, James (1972). "Planned Unit Development: Environmental Suboptimization". Environmental Affairs (17 ed.). 1 (4).
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Sternlieb, George; Burchell, Robert; Hughes, James; Listokin, David (1974). "Planned Unit Development Legislation: A Summary of Necessary Considerations". Urban Law Annual. 9.
  9. Hanke, Byron (1965). "Planned Unit Development and Land Use Intensity". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 114 (1): 17. doi:10.2307/3311033. JSTOR   3311033.
  10. Craig, David (1965). "Planned Unit Development as Seen from City Hall". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 114 (1): 127–135. doi:10.2307/3311037. JSTOR   3311037.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Wickersham, Jay (2001). "Jane Jacob's Critique of Zoning: From Euclid to Portland and Beyond". Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review. 28 (4).
  12. Hanke, Byron (1965). "Planned Unit Development and Land Use Intensity". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 114 (1): 21. doi:10.2307/3311033. JSTOR   3311033.
  13. "HOA Maintenance Responsibility in Condominiums and Planned Unit Developments". ECHO. May 2009. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
  14. 1 2 3 Hanke, Byron (1965). "Planned Unit Development and Land Use Intensity". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 114 (1): 19. doi:10.2307/3311033. JSTOR   3311033.
  15. Siegan, Bernard (1994). "Non-Zoning is the Best Zoning". California Western Law Review. 31 (1): 128.
  16. Krasnowiecki, Jan (1965). "Planned Unit Development: A Challenge to Established Theory and Practice of Land Use Control". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 114 (1): 48. doi:10.2307/3311034. JSTOR   3311034.