Proposed UK Internet age verification system

Last updated

One of the purposes of the Digital Economy Act 2017 was to introduce a mandatory age verification system for internet pornography. In 2019, following several delays and setbacks, the government repealed the section of the Act that would have introduced the system.

Contents

Background

With the passing of the Digital Economy Act 2017, the United Kingdom became the first country to pass a law containing a legal mandate on the provision of an Internet age verification system. Under the act, websites that published pornography on a commercial basis would have been required to implement a "robust" age verification system to prevent minors from accessing their sites. [1] [2] The regulator would have been empowered to fine those who fail to comply up to £250,000 (or up to 5% of their turnover), to order the blocking of non-compliant websites, and to require those providing financial or advertising services to non-compliant websites to cease doing so. [3]

After a series of setbacks, the planned scheme was eventually abandoned in 2019, [4] and the legislative provisions creating it were repealed by the Online Safety Act 2023. [5]

Delays and setbacks

The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) was planned to be charged with enforcing the scheme. [6] [7] [8] The implementation of the law was initially delayed multiple times to allow the BBFC to draft and receive approval for official guidelines regarding the age verification requirements. [9] [10] Following the passage of the Online Pornography (Commercial Basis) Regulations 2019 (which established a legal definition for the types of websites that would be subject to the requirements), implementation was again rescheduled, this time for a planned start date of April 2019. [2] In March 2019, reports stated that there was still no firm date for the implementation of this policy, which had been beset by many technical problems. [11] A BBC report at the time described implementation of the scheme as being "in a holding pattern". [12]

Key issues with the implementation included what constituted an effective means of age verification, as well as concerns over the possibility that online age verification providers could collect excessive personally identifiable information and process it for other purposes—potentially in violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). [13] "AgeID", a service proposed by internet pornography company MindGeek, was singled out by critics due to concerns that offering this service could unduly enhance its market position. [10] [14] The BBFC suggested that a system of gift card-like vouchers, purchased in person with ages checked by the retailer (identically to other age-restricted purchases such as alcohol) could provide a more anonymous and secure solution to age verification. [15]

Technical concerns included the use of VPNs [16] and DNS over HTTPS, [17] both of which make it more difficult to perform man-in-the-middle attacks such as those required for effective Internet blocking.

On 17 April 2019, regulators stated that the law would officially be effective from 15 July 2019. [1] However, on 20 June, the government announced that it had decided to delay implementation yet again, this time for another six months, for reasons including the government's failure to notify the scheme to the European Commission, and further concerns with technical issues. [18] [19]

Abandonment and repeal

On 16 October 2019, the Culture Secretary Nicky Morgan stated that the government had abandoned the mandate altogether, in favour of replacing it with a forthcoming wider scheme of Internet regulation based on the principles expressed in the Online Harms White Paper. [4] [20] [21]

The mandate was formally repealed by section 212 of the Online Safety Act 2023, [5] which came into force immediately upon that act receiving royal assent on 26 October 2023. [22]

In January 2020, a group of age verification companies started a legal action against the government, seeking a judicial review of its decision to suspend the age verification scheme. The companies included AgeChecked Ltd, AVSecure, AVYourself and VeriMe. [23] The plaintiffs contended that the Digital Economy Act 2017 gave the government the power to delay implementation but not to abandon it, and sought around £3 million in damages. [24] In July 2020, they won permission for a judicial review. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">R18 (British Board of Film Classification)</span> BBFC content rating used for hardcore pornographic films

R18 is a film or video classification given by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC). It is intended to provide a classification for works that do not breach UK law, but exceed what the BBFC considers acceptable in the 18 category. In practice, this means hardcore pornography.

Internet censorship in Australia is enforced by both the country's criminal law as well as voluntarily enacted by internet service providers. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has the power to enforce content restrictions on Internet content hosted within Australia, and maintain a blocklist of overseas websites which is then provided for use in filtering software. The restrictions focus primarily on child pornography, sexual violence, and other illegal activities, compiled as a result of a consumer complaints process.

Definitions and restrictions on pornography vary across jurisdictions. The production, distribution, and possession of pornographic films, photographs, and similar material are activities that are legal in many but not all countries, providing that any specific people featured in the material have consented to being included and are above a certain age. Various other restrictions often apply as well. The minimum age requirement for performers is most typically 18 years.

Pornography has been dominated by a few pan-European producers and distributors, the most notable of which is the Private Media Group that successfully claimed the position previously held by Color Climax Corporation in the early 1990s. Most European countries also have local pornography producers, from Portugal to Serbia, who face varying levels of competition with international producers. The legal status of pornography varies widely in Europe; its production and distribution are illegal in countries such as Ukraine, Belarus and Bulgaria, while Hungary has liberal pornography laws.

An age verification system, also known as an age gate, is any technical system that externally verifies a person's age. These systems are used primarily to restrict access to content classified, either voluntarily or by local laws, as being inappropriate for users under a specific age, such as alcohol, tobacco, gambling, video games with objectionable content, pornography, or to remain in compliance with online privacy laws that regulate the collection of personal information from minors, such as COPPA in the United States.

Internet censorship in the United Kingdom is conducted under a variety of laws, judicial processes, administrative regulations and voluntary arrangements. It is achieved by blocking access to sites as well as the use of laws that criminalise publication or possession of certain types of material. These include English defamation law, the Copyright law of the United Kingdom, regulations against incitement to terrorism and child pornography.

In the United Kingdom, pornography is regulated by a variety of laws, regulations, judicial processes, and voluntary schemes. Pornographic material generally has to be assessed by regulators or courts to determine its legality. British censorship laws with regard to pornography have often been some of the most restrictive in Western Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Board of Film Classification</span> British film classification organisation

The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) is a non-governmental organisation founded by the British film industry in 1912 and responsible for the national classification and censorship of films exhibited at cinemas and video works released on physical media within the United Kingdom. It has a statutory requirement to classify all video works released on VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, and, to a lesser extent, some video games under the Video Recordings Act 1984. The BBFC was also the designated regulator for the UK age-verification scheme, which was abandoned before being implemented.

Much of the regulation in the adult film industry has been limited to preventing child pornography. To enforce the age of entry restriction, most adult industry production companies are required to have a Custodian of Records that documents and holds records of the ages of all performers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aylo</span> Internet pornography company

Aylo is a Canadian multinational pornographic conglomerate owned by Canadian private equity firm Ethical Capital Partners. It is primarily involved in internet pornography, operating a number of video sharing websites, and pornographic film studios such as Brazzers, Digital Playground, Men.com, Reality Kings, Sean Cody, and WhyNotBi.com, among others. Aylo's headquarters are located in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, but the company's corporate structure is divided among entities domiciled in a number of other countries.

The Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD) was an industry body designated by Ofcom as the "co-regulator" of television on demand (VOD) in the UK from 2010 until 2015. ATVOD was founded following a European Union directive on the regulation of audiovisual media. It was responsible for regulating on-demand services such as ITV Player and Channel 4's All 4, as well as paid-for content on websites which were deemed to be "tv-like". ATVOD's role with regard to VOD ended on 31 December 2015, when the function was taken over by Ofcom directly.

Pornography in Asia includes pornography created in Asia, watched in Asia, or consumed or displayed in other parts of the world as one or more of the genres of Asian pornography.

The precise number of websites blocked in the United Kingdom is unknown. Blocking techniques vary from one Internet service provider (ISP) to another with some sites or specific URLs blocked by some ISPs and not others. Websites and services are blocked using a combination of data feeds from private content-control technology companies, government agencies, NGOs, court orders in conjunction with the service administrators who may or may not have the power to unblock, additionally block, appeal or recategorise blocked content.

xHamster is a pornographic media and social networking site headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus. xHamster serves user-submitted pornographic videos, webcam models, pornographic photographs, and erotic literature and incorporates social networking features. xHamster was founded in 2007. As of August 2024, it is the 33rd-most-visited website in the world and the third-most-visited adult website after Pornhub and XVideos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 is a statutory instrument of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that applies regulations to R18-rated pornography that is available through paid video on demand or other streaming platforms. Prior to the regulations coming into force, neither Ofcom nor the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) had jurisdiction over such content. In force from 1 December 2014, these regulations were made by the Secretary of State in exercise of the powers conferred by section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornhub</span> Pornographic video-sharing website owned by Aylo

Pornhub is a Canadian-owned internet pornography video-sharing website, one of several owned by adult entertainment conglomerate Aylo. As of August 2024, Pornhub is the 16th-most-visited website in the world and the most-visited adult website.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Economy Act 2017</span> United Kingdom law

The Digital Economy Act 2017 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is substantially different from, and shorter than, the Digital Economy Act 2010, whose provisions largely ended up not being passed into law. The act addresses policy issues related to electronic communications infrastructure and services, and updates the conditions for and sentencing of criminal copyright infringement. It was introduced to Parliament by culture secretary John Whittingdale on 5 July 2016. Whittingdale was replaced as culture secretary by Karen Bradley on 14 July 2016. The act received royal assent on 27 April 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Online Pornography (Commercial Basis) Regulations 2019</span> Statutory instrument intended to regulate access to pornographic websites in the UK

The Online Pornography Regulations 2019 is a statutory instrument issued under the powers given by the Digital Economy Act 2017. It defines the criteria to determine which websites would have been required to implement an age verification scheme, as part of the proposed UK Internet age verification system, the implementation of which was eventually abandoned in October 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Online Safety Act 2023</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Online Safety Act 2023 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online speech and media. It passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power, subject to parliamentary approval, to designate and suppress or record a wide range of speech and media deemed "harmful".

<i>Bill S-210</i> Canadian federal legislation

The Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act, commonly known as Bill S-210, and formerly as Bill S-203, is a Senate public bill introduced by Senator Julie Miville-Dechêne in the 44th Canadian Parliament. The bill would make it a criminal offence for organizations to allow Internet users under the age of 18 to access sexually explicit material for commercial purposes, unless the organization employs an age verification system, or the material has a legitimate artistic, educational, or scientific purpose. The bill also gives the government the ability to obtain court orders for internet service providers to block access to websites that do not follow compliance notices issued under the law.

References

  1. 1 2 Hern, Alex (2019-04-17). "Online pornography age checks to be mandatory in UK from 15 July". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2019-04-17.
  2. 1 2 Manthorpe, Rowland (2019-03-06). "Why the UK's porn block is one of the worst ideas ever". Wired UK. ISSN   1357-0978 . Retrieved 2019-03-08.
  3. ↑ Jamie Rigg (3 May 2017). "How the Digital Economy Act will come between you and porn". engadget. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
  4. 1 2 Waterson, Jim (2019-10-16). "UK drops plans for online pornography age verification system". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2019-10-16.
  5. 1 2 "Online Safety Act 2023: Section 212", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 26 October 2023, 2023 c. 50 (s. 212), retrieved 1 November 2023
  6. ↑ "Pornhub owner may become the UK's gatekeeper of online porn". Engadget. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  7. ↑ "Pornhub's owner reveals its age verification tool for the UK". Engadget. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  8. ↑ Kleinman, Zoe (2018-03-06). "Porn check critics fear data breach". BBC News. Retrieved 2018-04-27.
  9. ↑ "UK government delays rollout of controversial age-verification porn laws". The Verge. Retrieved 2018-05-29.
  10. 1 2 Gayle, Damien (2018-03-27). "UK website age checks could create Facebook of porn, critics warn". The Guardian. Retrieved 2018-05-29.
  11. ↑ Waterson, Jim (2019-03-16). "UK online pornography age block triggers privacy fears". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2019-03-24.
  12. ↑ "Delay to age checks for UK porn viewers?". BBC News. Retrieved 2019-03-27.
  13. ↑ Muffett, Alec (2016-10-28). "On the Digital Economy Bill". Medium. Retrieved 2019-10-21.
  14. ↑ Spadafora, Anthony (6 May 2019). "How the UK Porn Block could give one company an unfair advantage". TechRadar. Retrieved 2019-10-17.
  15. ↑ "UK newsstands will sell 'porn passes' to verify ages under new laws". The Verge. Retrieved 2018-05-29.
  16. ↑ Kelion, Leo (2019-04-17). "UK to introduce porn age-checks in July" . Retrieved 2019-10-21.
  17. ↑ at 18:39, Gareth Corfield 24 Sep 2019. "DoH! Mozilla assures UK minister that DNS-over-HTTPS won't be default in Firefox for Britons". www.theregister.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-10-21.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  18. ↑ "Online Pornography: Age Verification - Hansard". hansard.parliament.uk. Retrieved 2019-06-25.
  19. ↑ Waterson, Jim; Hern, Alex (2019-06-20). "UK age-verification system for porn delayed by six months". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2019-06-25.
  20. ↑ "UK's controversial 'porn blocker' plan dropped". BBC News. 2019-10-16. Retrieved 2019-10-16.
  21. ↑ "Written statements". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 2019-10-16. Retrieved 2019-10-16.
  22. ↑ "Online Safety Act 2023: Section 240", legislation.gov.uk , The National Archives, 26 October 2023, 2023 c. 50 (s. 240), retrieved 1 November 2023, The following provisions come into force on the day on which this Act is passed... section 212
  23. ↑ Wright, Mike (2020-01-16). "Tech companies launch legal action to force Government to bring in under 18s porn ban". The Telegraph. ISSN   0307-1235 . Retrieved 2020-01-17.
  24. ↑ Will Bedingfield (24 January 2020). "The UK's controversial porn block is making a comeback". Wired UK.
  25. ↑ Wright, Mike (2020-07-16). "Tech companies win first round of legal battle to force internet porn ban for children". The Telegraph. Retrieved 2021-02-26.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.