Protection from Harassment Act (Singapore)

Last updated

Protection from Harassment Act 2014
Parliament House Singapore.jpg
Parliament of Singapore
  • An Act to protect persons against harassment and unlawful stalking and to create offences, and provide civil remedies related thereto or in relation to false statements of fact.
CitationAct 17 of 2014
Enacted by Parliament of Singapore
Enacted13 March 2014
Assented to11 April 2014
Commenced15 November 2014
Legislative history
Bill titleProtection from Harassment Bill
Bill citationBill No: 12/2014
Bill published on3 March 2014
Introduced by K Shanmugam (Minister for Law)
First reading 3 March 2014
Second reading 13 March 2014
Third reading 13 March 2014
Amended by
Protection from Harassment (Amendment) Act 2019
Status: In force

The Protection from Harassment Act 2014 (POHA) is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that criminalises harassment, stalking, and other anti-social behaviour. The law is designed specifically to make acts of cyberbullying and online harassment a criminal offence. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Overview

The Act abolished the common law tort of harassment, replaced by its statutory provisions. [4] It also replaced sections 13A to 13D of the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act, and expanded the scope to cover acts conducted online and increased the penalties to include imprisonment sentences. [1] The Act is intended to cover both intentional and unintentional harassment, and has extra-territorial jurisdiction for certain offences which include online acts by the defendant if the complainant was in Singapore at the time of the offence and the defendant knew or should have known of that fact. [5] The new law is also to be accessible for the public than previously: [6] for instance, provisions are now made for alleged complainants to apply a protection order against an accused, and in more extreme cases a separate expedited protection order can be applied for and issued immediately. [6] [7] In addition, anyone who abuses public servant and public service worker, including service staff from the public transport service, can be prosecuted under this Act and the maximum penalty of jail for up to a year and/or a fine. [8] Generally, for uncomplicated and minor cases private in nature, the offences may be compoundable by the alleged complainant for an out-of-court settlement, but subject to the consent of the DPP. [9] For civil law and relational cases, they may be referred for mediation at the State Courts Centre for Dispute Resolution (SCCDR), including Magistrate's Complaints or applications under the Protection from Harassment Act. Mediation is a way of resolving a dispute without going for a trial in court. It is known as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method. [10]

Amendments in 2019

In 2019, the Parliament seek to amend the Act to tackle offences such as doxxing. The original 2014 Act would kick in only if the communications to be “threatening, abusive or insulting”. [11] Doxxing would not apply as it would only be considered as an act of divulging personal information. Additionally, the amendment simplified the process for victims to by setting up a specialised court within the State Courts of Singapore. [11] The amendment also introduced a mechanism for individuals and entities to seek correction orders to counter fake news about them. [11] Whilst there are similarities between this amendment and the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), POFMA can only be invoked by ministers of Singapore and it will take a longer time for individuals and entities to successfully apply for a correction order. [12]

Cases

The Ministry of Manpower, National Trades Union Congress and Singapore National Employers Federation are at present the primary institutions in deterring workplace harassment. [13]

In August 2015, a former Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) senior officer was charged in court under a POHA complaint filed by a woman complainant. The maximum penalty for the offence is up to a S$5,000 fine and 12 months' jail. In December 2016, fortunately, the defendant engaged a defence counsel and managed to compound the court charge by making an open court apology and a monetary compensation to the alleged complainant as a composition. [14] The alleged complainant was agreeable to the composition after the consequences of accepting and rejecting the offer of composition were thoroughly explained to her. Having considered the facts and in the light of further developments arising after he was first charged, the deputy public prosecutor has consented to composition. Hence, he was granted a discharge amounting to an acquittal by the court judge.

In May 2015, the Ministry of Defence obtained a protection order against The Online Citizen. [15] It was later, after legal arguments made by lawyers Choo Zhengxi and Eugene Thuraisingam, overturned by the Court of Appeal in January 2017, which ruled in a 2-1 judgement that the Government of Singapore is ineligible as a 'person' to apply for a protection order against any individual. [16]

In July 2019, a senior policeman was interdicted from service, charged in court and fined for harassment to a female colleague. [17] Thereafter, a Singapore Police Force (SPF) spokesperson said that its officers are not only expected to uphold the law but maintain the highest standards of conduct and integrity. He added that SPF deals severely with officers who break the law, including charging them in court. Moreover, SPF has since commenced disciplinary proceedings against him after the court verdict. [18]

In 2019, a few people were charged in court for using foul language to vehemently abuse public servants and public service workers. [19] [20]

As at March 2019, there were more than 500 Protection Order applications made since November 2014. [21]

In December 2019, a freelance actress-model Melissa Faith Yeo was charged and fined under POHA for abusive language and hurling vulgarities towards public servants. [22] [23] [24]

In March 2020, 5 men were charged in court for abusing public servants. [25] [26] [27]

See also

Reference list

  1. 1 2 Neo, Chai Chin (14 March 2014). "Anti-harassment laws to fight 'social scourge'". Today (newspaper). Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  2. Kwara, Michelle (27 February 2014). "Proposed anti-harassment law to clamp down on cyber bullying in Singapore introduced in Parliament". Yahoo! News. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  3. "Second Reading Speech by Minister for Law, K Shanmugam, on the Protection from Harassment Bill". Ministry of Law. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  4. Julia Yeo; Wei Qi Jen (11 June 2014). "Implications of Singapore's new Protection from Harassment Bill 2014". Lexology. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  5. Abu Baker, Jalelah (15 January 2015). "Protection from Harassment Act: 5 things you need to know about the landmark legislation". Straits Times. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  6. 1 2 Spykerman, Spykerman (15 January 2015). "Quicker, easier ways to get legal recourse for harassment". News 5 Tonight. Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  7. Chan, Wing Cheong (2014). "The offence of "Unlawful stalking" in Singapore" (PDF). Singapore Academy of Law. 26: 333–353. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 April 2015. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  8. Tan, Suan Tiu (7 April 2015). "Interpreting privacy laws a complex matter". Straits Times Forum. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
  9. "Criminal Procedure Code - Singapore Statutes Online". sso.agc.gov.sg.
  10. "An Overview of Mediation".
  11. 1 2 3 "A look at key changes to Protection from Harassment Act". TODAYonline. Retrieved 20 June 2020.
  12. "Blogger getting arrested for spreading fake news is fake news: Pritam Singh". mothership.sg. Retrieved 20 June 2020.
  13. Ho, Olivia (24 December 2015). "'Onus on employers' to fight harassment". Straits Times.
  14. "Man acquitted of stalking woman after compounding matter". The Straits Times. 3 December 2016.
  15. "Court rules claims that MINDEF stole idea for mobile first-aid vehicle are false". Channel NewsAsia. 16 May 2015. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
  16. Lum, Selina (16 January 2017). "Rare split decision by apex court rules that Govt cannot invoke anti-harassment law against The Online Citizen website". Straits Times. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  17. "Police officer who made crude remarks about subordinate fined $6,000 for harassment". The Straits Times. 30 July 2019.
  18. "Police officer fined for crude remarks about subordinate". The Straits Times. 31 July 2019.
  19. "Six men charged with abusing public servants". The Straits Times. 16 May 2019.
  20. "Six people charged with abusing public servants". The Straits Times. 7 June 2019.
  21. "More than 500 Protection Order applications made under POHA since Nov 2014: Edwin Tong". CNA.
  22. "Actress-model Melissa Faith Yeo charged with using vulgar language on policewoman, SMRT employee". The Straits Times. 9 September 2019.
  23. "Actress-model Melissa Faith Yeo fined after hurling vulgarities at police operator and SMRT employee". The Straits Times. 4 December 2019.
  24. "Former actress-model fined for cursing at police, SMRT worker". CNA.
  25. "5 men to be charged for abusing public servants as police disclose rise in such cases last year". The Straits Times. 12 March 2020.
  26. "Headbutts, kicking and spitting: 5 men to be charged over abuse of public servants, doctor". CNA.
  27. "Five men to be charged with abusing, attacking public servants, doctor in separate cases". TODAYonline.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Singapore Police Force</span> National police force of Singapore

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) is the national and principal law enforcement agency responsible for the prevention of crime and law enforcement in the Republic of Singapore. It is the country's lead agency against organised crime; human and weapons trafficking; cyber crime; as well as economic crimes that goes across domestic and international borders, but can be tasked to investigate any crime under the purview of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and is accountable to the Parliament of Singapore.

The Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) is a staff department of the Singapore Police Force (SPF). The department was first established in 1984 as the Commercial Crime Department (CCD), it is the white-collar crimes unit of the SPF.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sedition Act (Singapore)</span> Statute of the Parliament of Singapore

The Sedition Act 1948 was a Singaporean statute law which prohibited seditious acts and speech; and the printing, publication, sale, distribution, reproduction and importation of seditious publications. The essential ingredient of any offence under the Act was the finding of a "seditious tendency", and the intention of the offender is irrelevant. The Act also listed several examples of what is not a seditious tendency, and provides defences for accused persons in a limited number of situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caning in Singapore</span> Corporal punishment

Caning is a widely used form of corporal punishment in Singapore. It can be divided into several contexts: judicial, prison, reformatory, military, school and domestic. These practices of caning as punishment were introduced during the period of British colonial rule in Singapore. Similar forms of corporal punishment are also used in some other former British colonies, including two of Singapore's neighbouring countries, Malaysia and Brunei.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Singapore</span> Death penalty as a legal punishment in Singapore

Capital punishment in Singapore is a legal punishment. Executions in Singapore are carried out by long drop hanging, and they usually take place at dawn. Thirty-three offences—including murder, drug trafficking, terrorism, use of firearms and kidnapping—warrant the death penalty under Singapore law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Narcotics Bureau</span> Singapores drug enforcement agency

The Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) is a department under the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) tasked to combat drug trafficking and distribution and is responsible for coordinating all matters pertaining to drug eradication in Singapore.

Human rights in Singapore are codified in the Constitution of Singapore, which sets out the legal rights of its citizens. These rights are protected by the Constitution and include amendments and referendums. These rights have evolved significantly from the days since independence, though the government in Singapore has broad powers to possibly limit citizens' rights or to inhibit political opposition. In 2018, Singapore was ranked 151st by Reporters Without Borders in the Worldwide Press Freedom Index. U.S.-based Freedom in the World scored Singapore 4 out of 7 for "political rights", and 4 out of 7 for "civil liberties", with an overall ranking of "partly free" for the year 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act</span> Statute of the Parliament of Singapore

The Criminal Law Act 1955 is a Singapore statute that, among other things, allows the executive branch of the Government of Singapore to order that suspected criminals be detained without trial. It was introduced in 1955 during the colonial era and intended to be a temporary measure, but has since been renewed continuously; the Government has declined to make it permanent, claiming it "believe[s] that the Act should be explicitly extended by Parliament every five years". The validity of the Act was most recently extended in February 2018, and it will remain in force till October 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vandalism Act</span> Statute of the Parliament of Singapore

The Vandalism Act 1966 is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that criminalizes a number of different acts done in relation to public and private property, namely, stealing, destroying or damaging public property; and, without the property owner's written consent, writing, drawing, painting, marking or inscribing on property; affixing posters, placards, etc., to the property; and suspending or displaying on or from the property any flag, banner, etc.

Internet censorship in Singapore is carried out by the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). Internet services provided by the three major Internet service providers (ISPs) are subject to regulation by the MDA, which requires blocking of a symbolic number of websites containing "mass impact objectionable" material, including Playboy, YouPorn and Ashley Madison. The civil service, tertiary institutions and Institute of Technical Education has its own jurisdiction to block websites displaying pornography, information about drugs and online piracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protection from Harassment Act 1997</span> Law of the United Kingdom

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. On introducing the Bill's second reading in the House of Lords, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, said, "The aim of this Bill is to protect the victims of harassment. It will protect all such victims whatever the source of the harassment—so-called stalking behaviour, racial harassment, or anti-social behaviour by neighbours." Home Office guidance on the Act says "The legislation was always intended to tackle stalking, but the offences were drafted to tackle any form of persistent conduct which causes another person alarm or distress."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">K. Shanmugam</span> Singaporean politician

Shanmugam Kasiviswanathan, better known as K. Shanmugam, is a Singaporean politician and lawyer who has been serving as Minister for Law since 2008 and Minister for Home Affairs since 2015. A member of the governing People's Action Party (PAP), he has been the Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Chong Pang division of Nee Soon GRC since 2011.

Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011 is an Act of the Parliament of India which provides a mechanism to investigate alleged corruption and misuse of power by public servants and also protect anyone who exposes alleged wrongdoing in government bodies, projects and offices. The wrongdoing might be in the form of fraud, corruption or mismanagement. The Act will also ensure punishment for false or frivolous complaints.

Yes that is how they are defining it but it is not accurate. Revenge Porn is the distribution of sexually explicit images or videos of individuals without their consent when there is an excuse made by the perpetrator that it is percieved as an act of retribution. This is not the same as Stealth Porn which is the distribution and or production of sexually explicit images or videos of individuals without their consent and without any provocation by the victim and sometimes without their awareness. And it isn't the same as Coercion Porn whereby the distribution of the sexually explicit images or videos of individuals made under coercion and later lack of consent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Singapore</span>

Corruption in Singapore is generally perceived as one of the lowest in the world. Cases are mostly handled by the Singapore Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), a government agency in Singapore that investigates and prosecutes corruption in the public and private sectors. According to a Transparency International survey, an overwhelming majority of people in Singapore do not hear cases of corruption by public officials or institutions through media in their lifetime. In 2020, Singapore's public sector was ranked by Transparency International as the fourth least corrupt in the world and the most transparent in Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arms Offences Act</span> Statute of the Parliament of Singapore

The Arms Offences Act 1973 is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that criminalizes the illegal possession of arms and ammunition and the carrying, trafficking, and usage of arms. The law is designed specifically to make acts of ownership, knowingly receiving payment in connection with the trade of a trafficked armaments and ammunition, as well as the unlawful usage of arms and ammunition a criminal offence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public spaces protection order</span> Orders which ban specific acts in a designated geographical area in England and Wales

Public spaces protection orders (PSPOs) are orders under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 which ban specific acts in a designated geographical area in England and Wales as set out in the act. They replace the earlier designated public place orders, gating orders and dog control orders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019</span> Statute of the Parliament of Singapore

The Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019, commonly abbreviated as POFMA and known colloquially as Fake News Law, is a statute of the Parliament of Singapore that enables authorities to tackle the spread of fake news or false information.

Charles Yeo Yao Hui is a Singaporean lawyer and former politician who served as the chairman of the opposition Reform Party between 2020 and 2022.