Provisional liquidation

Last updated

Provisional liquidation is a process which exists as part of the corporate insolvency laws of a number of common law jurisdictions whereby after the lodging of a petition for the winding-up of a company by the court, but before the court hears and determines the petition, the court may appoint a liquidator on a "provisional" basis. [1] (The provisional liquidator is appointed to safeguard the assets of the company and maintain the status quo pending the hearing of the petition.) Unlike a conventional liquidator, a provisional liquidator does not assess claims against the company or try to distribute the company's assets to creditors, as the power to realise the assets comes after the court orders a liquidation. [2]

Contents

In practice most instances of applications for a provisional liquidator involve some type of allegation of fraud or other misconduct relating to the company. [3]

Application

Typically, an application for the appointment of a provisional liquidator is made by either: [2]

  1. a creditor, where they are concerned that the assets of the company are at risk or might be dissipated or put beyond the reach of creditors during the period before the winding up application is heard;
  2. the shareholders, where they are concerned that the directors of the company are acting improperly; or
  3. the company itself. This may arise due to a dispute between directors and other officers, or because the company is insolvent and the directors do not want to risk insolvent trading claims in the period before an official liquidator is appointed. In some jurisdictions (but not all) the company may apply to put itself into provisional liquidation to shield itself from creditor claims whilst it tries to implement a restructuring.

The remedy is an exceptional one, and most instances of applications for a provisional liquidator are made because of concerns about some type of material impropriety. [3] In exceptional cases it is also possible for public authorities to apply for the appointment of a provisional liquidator to protect the public interest from fraud or other similar conduct, although this is much less common. [4]

The court invariably has a discretion whether to appoint a provisional liquidator. A court will not normally approve the application unless it is satisfied that there is a strong likelihood that a liquidator will be appointed on the substantive application. But even if the company is likely to go into liquidation, provisional liquidation is still an exceptional interim or "emergency remedy". [5] There need to be special reasons for the appointment of a provisional liquidator in the interim period. Normally this is because the assets must face a high risk of dissipation or there must be some other urgent reason why a liquidator is required for the interim period. [6]

Applications are most likely to be granted in situations where: [6]

Conversely, because there needs to be some urgency or risk of dissipation of assets, applications are likely to be refused if: [6]

Given their nature, applications for provisional liquidation are often made urgently and without giving notice to the company or its directors. Where the application is made without notice: [1]

  1. the applicant is under a duty to give "full and frank disclosure" to the court of all material facts (including any facts which are adverse to the applicant); and
  2. the applicant will normally have to give an undertaking in damages to compensate the company for any loss caused if it subsequently transpires after a full hearing that the order should not have been. [7]

Effect

If the court makes the order then a provisional liquidator is appointed over the company, and the control of all assets of the company, and the conduct of any business and other affairs of the company are transferred to the provisional liquidator. The directors cease to have any authority. [2] In almost all jurisdictions, the provisional liquidator will normally have to be a licensed insolvency practitioner.

The provisional liquidator will generally only have the powers and functions conferred upon him or her by the order of the court. It is not normally part of the role of a provisional liquidator to collect and sell the assets of the company or otherwise take steps in relation to the actual winding up the company. The principal reason for the appointment is the preservation of the company's property. [8]

One of the common functions of a provisional liquidator is to investigate whether the company's property has been misappropriated or its business has been wrongfully conducted. But generally speaking a provisional liquidator will not have power to bring proceedings on behalf of the company for wrongful trading, or to challenge transactions as undervalue transactions or unfair preferences. [9]

Termination

Provisional liquidation will normally come to an end in one of three ways: [1]

  1. a full winding up order is made;
  2. an order of the court is made discharging the provisional liquidation (normally at an inter partes hearing to challenge the original appointment); or
  3. the winding up petition itself is dismissed.

Specific jurisdictions

The effect of provisional liquidation varies from jurisdiction to the jurisdiction.

Australia

In Australia provisional liquidation is regulated by section 472(2) of Corporations Act 2001. [10] In Australia provisional liquidators must be licensed insolvency practitioners. [2]

British Virgin Islands

Under British Virgin Islands law provisional liquidation is regulated by section 170(4) of the Insolvency Act 2003. [11] In Akai Holdings Limited v Brinlow Investments Limited [12] it was held that an applicant would need to show four things:

  1. a petition before the court for the appointment of a liquidator;
  2. a good arguable case that a ground for the appointment of a liquidator exists;
  3. a good arguable case that the applicant has the necessary standing; and
  4. that the court should exercise its discretion to maintain the status quo in relation to the company’s assets.

Canada

In Canada provision liquidation is regulated under section 28 of the Winding-up and Restructuring Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. W-11). [13]

Cayman Islands

In the Cayman Islands, provisional liquidation is principally regulated by section 104(3) of the Companies Law (2013) Revision. One unusual feature of provisional liquidation in Cayman is that it is possible to appoint a provisional liquidator and still allow the directors to retain their powers of management. [14] This in part facilitates a slightly unusual use of provisional liquidation in the Cayman Islands as part of a debtor in possession corporate rehabilitation process. The company itself will apply for an order for provisional liquidation, and provisional liquidators are appointed which effectively creates a stay on the claims of unsecured creditors. The board of directors can then use that "breathing space" to try and implement a restructuring of the company's debts pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, or pursuant to an international restructuring process in the courts of another jurisdictions. [15] This approach has not been rejected in the courts of other jurisdictions (such as Hong Kong), [16] but accepted in others. [17]

Hong Kong

In Hong Kong, there are three types of provisional liquidators. [18] There are "traditional" provisional liquidators, appointed under section 193 of the Hong Kong Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap 32); there are also provisional liquidators appointed pursuant to a members' voluntary liquidation under section 228A of the Ordinance, and there are "Panel T" appointments under section 194(1A) of the Ordinance whereby the Official Receiver is appointed as provisional liquidator.

Since the decision in the Legend case in 2006 [19] provisional liquidation may not be used as a means of shielding the company from creditor's claims to facilitate a restructuring in Hong Kong, [16] although prior to that date the practice was relatively common. [18]

South Africa

In South Africa, "provisional liquidation" has a very different meaning. When a creditor or other person applies to the court for the liquidation of a business, then the order is first made a provisional basis, and then subsequent confirmed (or not) at a full hearing, much like a decree nisi and a decree absolut in other jurisdictions. [20]

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom the power to appoint a provisional liquidator is found in section 135(1), of the Insolvency Act 1986, and it is regarded as an "emergency procedure". [1] The categories of persons who may apply for the appointment are set out at rule 4.25(1) of the Insolvency Rules 1986. [21] Under English law, all provisional liquidators are required to be licensed insolvency practitioners. [22] If upon the application for the appointment of a liquidator, there are concerns about potential dissipation of assets or misconduct on the part of the directors, then the court may order the appointment of a provisional liquidator. [1] Provisional liquidation is essentially an "emergency procedure". A provisional liquidator may only be appointed by the court only after a winding-up petition has been presented [23] The main reason for appointing a provisional liquidator is normally to preserve the company's assets. In practice most instances of applications for a provisional liquidator involve some kind of fraud or other misconduct. [3] The applicant will normally need to show that (a) it is likely that a winding-up order will be made at the hearing of the petition; and (b) the company's assets are at risk prior to the hearing of the petition (which includes either dissipation of the company's assets, or the potential loss or destruction of the company's books and records. [24] Accordingly, it will normally be necessary to establish either (or both) that: (a) the company is clearly insolvent, and it is likely that a winding-up order will be made at the hearing of the petition; and/or (b) there has been the type of misconduct that would justify a just and equitable winding-up. An appointment of a provisional liquidator may also be made where it is in the public interest. [25]

Because of the emergency nature of the remedy applications for provisional liquidation are very often made urgently and without giving notice to the company. In such cases, the applicant is under a legal obligation to give full and frank disclosure to the court of all material facts, including facts which are adverse to the applicant's own case. The applicant will also normally be required to give an undertaking in damages in the event the court subsequently determines that the order should not have been made to compensate the company for any damage caused to it by the appointment. [7]

If a provisional liquidator is appointed then the powers of the company's directors are effectively terminated, and the board will retain only a residual power to apply to dismiss or resist the winding-up petition. [26] The appointment of a provisional liquidator comes to an end when: [1]

  1. a liquidator is appointed at a full hearing;
  2. the provisional liquidator is discharged by order of the court; or
  3. the underlying winding up petition is dismissed.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquidation</span> Winding-up of a company

Liquidation is the process in accounting by which a company is brought to an end in Canada, United Kingdom, United States, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Italy, and many other countries. The assets and property of the company are redistributed. Liquidation is also sometimes referred to as winding-up or dissolution, although dissolution technically refers to the last stage of liquidation. The process of liquidation also arises when customs, an authority or agency in a country responsible for collecting and safeguarding customs duties, determines the final computation or ascertainment of the duties or drawback accruing on an entry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insolvency</span> State of being unable to pay ones debts

In accounting, insolvency is the state of being unable to pay the debts, by a person or company (debtor), at maturity; those in a state of insolvency are said to be insolvent. There are two forms: cash-flow insolvency and balance-sheet insolvency.

An officer of the Insolvency Service of the United Kingdom, an official receiver (OR) is an officer of the court to which they are attached. The OR is answerable to the courts for carrying out the courts' orders and for fulfilling their duties under law. They also act on directions, instructions and guidance from the service's Inspector General or, less often, from the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

Wrongful trading is a type of civil wrong found in UK insolvency law, under Section 214 Insolvency Act 1986. It was introduced to enable contributions to be obtained for the benefit of creditors from those responsible for mismanagement of the insolvent company. Under Australian insolvency law the equivalent concept is called "insolvent trading".

In law, a liquidator is the officer appointed when a company goes into winding-up or liquidation who has responsibility for collecting in all of the assets under such circumstances of the company and settling all claims against the company before putting the company into dissolution. Liquidator is a person officially appointed to 'liquidate' a company or firm. Their duty is to ascertain and settle the liabilities of a company or a firm. If there are any surplus, then those are distributed to the contributories.

As a legal concept, administration is a procedure under the insolvency laws of a number of common law jurisdictions, similar to bankruptcy in the United States. It functions as a rescue mechanism for insolvent entities and allows them to carry on running their business. The process – in the United Kingdom colloquially called being "under administration" – is an alternative to liquidation or may be a precursor to it. Administration is commenced by an administration order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom insolvency law</span> Law in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

United Kingdom insolvency law regulates companies in the United Kingdom which are unable to repay their debts. While UK bankruptcy law concerns the rules for natural persons, the term insolvency is generally used for companies formed under the Companies Act 2006. Insolvency means being unable to pay debts. Since the Cork Report of 1982, the modern policy of UK insolvency law has been to attempt to rescue a company that is in difficulty, to minimise losses and fairly distribute the burdens between the community, employees, creditors and other stakeholders that result from enterprise failure. If a company cannot be saved it is liquidated, meaning that the assets are sold off to repay creditors according to their priority. The main sources of law include the Insolvency Act 1986, the Insolvency Rules 1986, the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, the Employment Rights Act 1996 Part XII, the EU Insolvency Regulation, and case law. Numerous other Acts, statutory instruments and cases relating to labour, banking, property and conflicts of laws also shape the subject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Examinership</span> Process in Irish law

Examinership is a process in Irish law whereby the protection of the Court is obtained to assist the survival of a company. It allows a company to restructure with the approval of the High Court.

Liquidation is the process by which companies are wound-up, bringing their life to an end. The liquidator is the person appointed to supervise and implement the company's winding up.

<i>Re Grays Inn Construction Co Ltd</i>

Re Gray's Inn Construction Co Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 711 is a leading UK insolvency law case, concerning the cessation of transactions without court approval after a winding up petition.

<i>Winding-up and Restructuring Act</i>

The Winding-up and Restructuring Act ("WURA") is a statute of the Parliament of Canada that provides for the winding up of certain corporations and the restructuring of financial institutions. It was passed in 1985, and has been amended since. Predecessors of the act date back to 1882.

Administration in United Kingdom law is the main kind of procedure in UK insolvency law when a company is unable to pay its debts. The management of the company is usually replaced by an insolvency practitioner whose statutory duty is to rescue the company, save the business, or get the best result possible. While creditors with a security interest over all a company's assets could control the procedure previously through receivership, the Enterprise Act 2002 made administration the main procedure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Virgin Islands company law</span>

The British Virgin Islands company law is the law that governs businesses registered in the British Virgin Islands. It is primarily codified through the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004, and to a lesser extent by the Insolvency Act, 2003 and by the Securities and Investment Business Act, 2010. The British Virgin Islands has approximately 30 registered companies per head of population, which is likely the highest ratio of any country in the world. Annual company registration fees provide a significant part of Government revenue in the British Virgin Islands, which accounts for the comparative lack of other taxation. This might explain why company law forms a much more prominent part of the law of the British Virgin Islands when compared to countries of similar size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Virgin Islands bankruptcy law</span>

British Virgin Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in the Insolvency Act, 2003, and to a lesser degree in the Insolvency Rules, 2005. Most of the emphasis of bankruptcy law in the British Virgin Islands relates to corporate insolvency rather than personal bankruptcy. As an offshore financial centre, the British Virgin Islands has many times more resident companies than citizens, and accordingly the courts spend more time dealing with corporate insolvency and reorganisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayman Islands company law</span> National economic law

Cayman Islands company law is primarily codified in the Companies Law and the Limited Liability Companies Law, 2016, and to a lesser extent in the Securities and Investment Business Law. The Cayman Islands is a leading offshore financial centre, and financial services form a significant part of the economy of the Cayman Islands. Accordingly company law forms a much more prominent part of the law of the Cayman Islands than might otherwise be expected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayman Islands bankruptcy law</span>

Cayman Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in five statutes and statutory instruments:

<i>Coutts & Co v Stock</i>

Coutts & Co v Stock[1999] EWHC 191 (Ch), [2000] 1 WLR 906 is a UK insolvency law case, concerning voidable transactions.

Australian insolvency law regulates the position of companies which are in financial distress and are unable to pay or provide for all of their debts or other obligations, and matters ancillary to and arising from financial distress. The law in this area is principally governed by the Corporations Act 2001. Under Australian law, the term insolvency is usually used with reference to companies, and bankruptcy is used in relation to individuals. Insolvency law in Australia tries to seek an equitable balance between the competing interests of debtors, creditors and the wider community when debtors are unable to meet their financial obligations. The aim of the legislative provisions is to provide:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong insolvency law</span> Financial regulation in Hong Kong

Hong Kong insolvency law regulates the position of companies which are in financial distress and are unable to pay or provide for all of their debts or other obligations, and matters ancillary to and arising from financial distress. The law in this area is now primarily governed by the Companies Ordinance and the Companies Rules. Prior to 2012 Cap 32 was called the Companies Ordinance, but when the Companies Ordinance came into force in 2014, most of the provisions of Cap 32 were repealed except for the provisions relating to insolvency, which were retained and the statute was renamed to reflect its new principal focus.

<i>Brooks v Armstrong</i>

Brooks v Armstrong[2016] EWHC 2289 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 117 (Nov) is a UK insolvency law case on wrongful trading under section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Provisional liquidation: a quick guide". Practical Law. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Provisional Liquidation". Worrells. 25 September 2013. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  3. 1 2 3 Steven Fennell and Darren Bradshaw (19 June 2013). "Provisional liquidation and fraud". Lexology. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  4. ↑ See, for example, Re Treasure Traders Corporation Ltd [2005] EWHC 2774(Ch), in which the company was operating an unlawful lottery.
  5. ↑ Daniel Lewis and Nyla Yousuf. "Provisional liquidations - kill or cure?" (PDF). Business Rescue. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  6. 1 2 3 "Restructuring & Insolvency - Provisional liquidation" (PDF). Clayton Utz . Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  7. 1 2 Re Highfield Commodities Ltd [1984] BCLC 623.
  8. ↑ Ashborder BV v Green Gas Power Ltd [2005] EWHC 1031(Ch)
  9. ↑ In the matter of Overnight Limited [2009] EWHC 601(Ch)
  10. ↑ "Corporations Act 2001, section 472" . Retrieved 30 July 2015..
  11. ↑ Harney Westwood & Riegels (2014). British Virgin Islands Commercial Law (3rd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. 7.073. ISBN   9789626615294.
  12. ↑ (BVIHCV 2006/0134) at [44] onwards.
  13. ↑ "Winding-up and Restructuring Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. W-11)". Justice Laws Website. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  14. ↑ Companies Winding Up Rules (2008 Revision), Order 4, rule 7(3).
  15. ↑ "Cayman Islands Provisional Liquidations in Support of Chapter 11 Proceedings". Maples and Calder. 17 December 2012. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  16. 1 2 Andrew Kinnison and Jacky Yeung (4 August 2006). "Corporate Rescue: The Need for Legislation". International Law Office. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  17. ↑ Philip R. Wood (2007). Principles of International Insolvency. Sweet & Maxwell. ISBN   9781847032102 . Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  18. 1 2 "Provisional Liquidators" (PDF). Briscoe Wong Ferrier. Retrieved 30 July 2015.[ permanent dead link ]
  19. ↑ Re Legend International Resorts Ltd [2006] 2 HKLRD 192
  20. ↑ Nanika Prinsloo. "Liquidating a Business in South Africa". FindanAttorney. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
  21. ↑ SI 1925 of 1986.
  22. ↑ Insolvency Act 1986, section 388(1)(a).
  23. ↑ Insolvency Act 1986 s 135(1).
  24. ↑ Revenue & Customs v Rochdale Drinks Distributors Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1116
  25. ↑ Re Treasure Traders Corporation Ltd [2005] EWHC 2774(Ch)
  26. ↑ Ashborder BV v Green Gas Power Ltd [2005] EWHC 1031(Ch)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.