RE 1224374

Last updated

RE 1224374
Supreme Federal Court of Brazil.jpg
Court Supreme Federal Court
Full case nameRecurso Extraordinário 1.224.374 (Transit State Department  [ pt ]-RS v. Joel Porn de Freitas)
Started14 August 2019 (2019-08-14)
Decided19 May 2022 (2022-05-19)
Court membership
Judges sittingPresident

Luiz Fux

Justices

Case opinions
Decision byFux
ConcurrenceBarroso, Fachin, Lewandowski, Lúcia, Marques, Mendes, Mendonça, de Moraes, Toffoli, Weber
Keywords

RE 1.224.374 was a case of the Supreme Court of Brazil concerning the constitutionality of penalizing refusal to submit oneself to drug influence tests on traffic stops, such as a breathalyzer. The case's rapporteur, minister Luiz Fux, cast the initial vote and the Court unanimously agreed, upholding the constitutionality of such penalties.

Contents

The case was judged alongside ADI 4017 and ADI 4103, both regarding the constitutionality of prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages alongside highways and its inspection by the Highway Police.

Background

The case was brought to the Supreme Court after the Transit State Department  [ pt ] of Rio Grande do Sul challenged a decision by the state's Court of Justice (TJ-RS) to reverse penalties imposed upon a driver that refused a breathalyzer test. [1]

Specifically, the case put into question the constitutionality of Article 165-A of the Brazilian Transit Code: [2]

Art. 165-A. Recusar-se a ser submetido a teste, exame clínico, perícia ou outro procedimento que permita certificar influência de álcool ou outra substância psicoativa, na forma estabelecida pelo art. 277:

Infração - gravíssima;

Penalidade - multa (dez vezes) e suspensão do direito de dirigir por 12 (doze) meses;

Medida administrativa - recolhimento do documento de habilitação e retenção do veículo, observado o disposto no § 4º do art. 270.

Parágrafo único. Aplica-se em dobro a multa prevista no caput em caso de reincidência no período de até 12 (doze) meses.

Art. 165-A. Refusing to submit to a test, clinical exam, investigation or other procedure that certifies influence of alcohol or other psychoactive substance, as established by art. 277:

Infraction - very grave;

Penalty - fine (ten times) and suspension of the right to drive for 12 (twelve) months;

Administrative measure - withdrawal of driver's license and seizure of vehicle, following § 4 of art. 270.

Single paragraph. The fine prescribed on the caput is doubled in case of reincidence in the period of up to 12 (twelve) months.

Law 9.503/1997 (Brazilian Transit Code  [ pt ])

The argument against the constitutionality of the article was that penalizing the refusal to test for inebriation would restrict the accused's defense, and could lead to self-incrimination. [2]

High Court decision

The Court unanimously ruled that, since the refusal does not constitute a crime and is instead only penalized by administrative sanctions, there is no violation of the principle of no self-incrimination. [1] Additionally, it was decided that sanctioning test refusal is an effective means of enforcing the law. [1]

Judiciary representation

Supreme Court members MinistersYesNo
Luiz Fux 11
Luís Roberto Barroso 11
Edson Fachin 11
Ricardo Lewandowski 11
Cármen Lúcia 11
Nunes Marques 11
Gilmar Mendes 11
André Mendonça 11
Alexandre de Moraes 11
Dias Toffoli 11
Rosa Weber 11
Total111100

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delúbio Soares</span>

Delúbio Soaresde Castro is a Brazilian trade unionist who has had a long professional association with the Brazilian Workers Party (PT). He is particularly noted for his involvement in the mensalão scandal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Federal Court</span> Supreme court of Brazil

The Federal Supreme Court is the supreme court of Brazil, serving primarily as the country's Constitutional Court. It is the highest court of law in Brazil for constitutional issues and its rulings cannot be appealed. On cases involving exclusively non-constitutional issues, regarding federal laws, the highest court is, by rule, the Superior Court of Justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Council of Justice</span> Advisory judicial body in Brazil

The National Council of Justice (CNJ) is an administrative and oversight organ of the Brazilian Judiciary created by constitutional amendment in 2004 as a part of judicial reform. Among its responsibilities are ensuring that the judicial system remains autonomous, conducting disciplinary proceedings against members of the Judiciary, and compiling and publishing statistics on the Brazilian court system. The Council has nationwide jurisdiction over all courts except the Supreme Federal Court, but makes no rulings on cases and does not review judgements of other courts. Its fifteen members are chosen by the Supreme Federal Court for two-year terms.

Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body. Until Schmerber, the Supreme Court had not yet clarified whether state police officers must procure a search warrant before taking blood samples from criminal suspects. Likewise, the Court had not yet clarified whether blood evidence taken against the wishes of a criminal suspect may be used against that suspect in the course of a criminal prosecution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-discrimination laws in Brazil</span>

Anti-discrimination laws in Brazil are present in the Constitution of Brazil, in the labour law, in the child and adolescent law, in the ageing law, and in the penal code.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luiz Fux</span> Brazilian judge

Luiz Fux is a Brazilian judge and the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Federal Court. He is of Romanian Jewish descent, and the first Jewish Brazilian member of the Court. He was previously a minister of the Superior Court of Justice before assuming his position at the Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cármen Lúcia</span> Brazilian judge (1954)

Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha is a Brazilian jurist and member of the Supreme Federal Court since 2006. She is the second woman to have been chosen as a justice for the Court and Chief Justice and a professor of Constitutional Law at Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais. She was nominated by former President of Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Antunes Rocha's work has been marked by the rigor with which she tries corruption cases and her firm stance regarding women's rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ficha Limpa</span> Brazilian electoral law

Lei da Ficha Limpa or Complementary Law no. 135 of 2010 is a Brazilian act that amended the Conditions of Ineligibility Act. It was the fourth bill proposed by direct people's initiative as law in Brazil. It was devised by Judge Marlon Reis and received about 1.3 million signatures before being submitted to the National Congress. The act makes a candidate who has been impeached, has resigned to avoid impeachment, or been convicted by a decision of a collective body ineligible to hold public office for eight years, even if possible appeals remain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luís Roberto Barroso</span> Brazilian professor, jurist and justice

Luís Roberto Barroso is a Brazilian law professor, jurist, Justice and President of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil, having been nominated to the position by President Dilma Rousseff in 2013. Between 2020 and 2022, Barroso also served as President of the Superior Electoral Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Car Wash</span> Years-long Brazilian criminal investigation into corruption

Operation Car Wash, or Operation Jet Wash, was a landmark anti-corruption probe in Brazil. Beginning in March 2014 as the investigation of a small car wash in Brasília over money laundering, the proceedings uncovered a massive corruption scheme in the Brazilian federal government, particularly in state-owned enterprises. The probe was conducted through a joint task force of agents in the federal police, revenue collection agency, internal audit office and antitrust regulator. Evidence was collected and presented to the court system by a team of federal prosecutors led by Deltan Dallagnol, while the judge in charge of the operation was Sergio Moro. Eventually, other federal prosecutors and judges would go on to oversee related cases under their jurisdictions in various Brazilian states. The operation implicated leading businessmen, federal congressmen, senators, state governors, federal government ministers, and former presidents Collor, Temer and Lula. Companies and individuals accused of involvement have agreed to pay 25 billion reais in fines and restitution of embezzled public funds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geddel Vieira Lima</span> Brazilian politician

Geddel Vieira Lima is a Brazilian politician who served in the Cabinet of Brazil under President Michel Temer until his resignation on 25 November 2016, amid accusations that he and the President had pressured Minister of Culture Marcelo Calero to approve a real estate project to build a 30-floor apartment building in a historic district of Ladeira da Barra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teori Zavascki</span>

Teori Albino Zavascki was a Brazilian judge who served as a Minister of the Superior Court of Justice from 8 May 2003 until 29 November 2012, appointed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and as a Minister of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil from 29 November 2012 until his death on 19 January 2017, having been appointed to the position by President Dilma Rousseff. At the time of his death he was the justice in charge of the trials resulting from Operation Car Wash.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dias Toffoli</span> Brazilian Jurist & Magistrate & Minister of Supreme Federal Court

José Antonio Dias Toffoli is a Brazilian lawyer who has been a member of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil since 2009, nominated by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Toffoli was the president of the Supreme Federal Court for the 2018–20 term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexandre de Moraes</span> Brazilian jurist, lawyer and politician

Alexandre de Moraes is a Brazilian jurist, currently serving as president of the Superior Electoral Court and as a justice of the Supreme Federal Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rosa Weber</span> Brazilian judge and former Minister of Supreme Court

Rosa Maria Pires Weber is a Brazilian magistrate, former justice and former president of the Supreme Federal Court, former president of the Superior Electoral Court and former justice of the Superior Labor Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">André Mendonça</span> Brazilian lawyer and supreme court judge

André Luiz de Almeida Mendonça is a Brazilian attorney, Presbyterian pastor, and politician currently serving as Justice of the Supreme Federal Court. He is the third evangelical Christian positioned to join the top court, and former Minister of Justice and Public Security and Attorney General of the Union in the administration of President Jair Bolsonaro. Prior to assuming this role, he served as Attorney General of Brazil in the same administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Odebrecht–Car Wash leniency agreement</span> Legal maneuver in Brazils Operation Car Wash

The Odebrecht–Car Wash leniency agreement, also known in Brazil as the "end of the world plea deal", was the leniency agreement signed between Odebrecht S.A. and the Public Prosecutor's Office (PGR) in December 2016, as part of Operation Car Wash. The agreement provided for the deposition of 78 of the contractor's executives, including the former president Marcelo Odebrecht, and his father, Emílio Odebrecht, which generated 83 investigations at the Supreme Federal Court (STF).

The Gil Rugai Case refers to the murder, in 2004, by Gil Grego Rugai of his father Luiz Carlos Rugai and his stepmother Alessandra de Fátima Troitino. The case was included in the lists of crimes that impacted Brazil by Brasil Online (BOL) and Terra. The case was shown on the programs Criminal Investigation and Crime Doesn't Pay

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Milestone thesis</span> Brazilian judicial case

The milestone thesis, also known as the time marker or Copacabana thesis, is a legal thesis constructed by a case law based on the judgment of the Raposa Serra do Sol case by the Supreme Federal Court (STF) of Brazil in 2009. In it, the Supreme Court decided that the article of the Constitution which guarantees the usufruct of lands traditionally occupied by Brazilian indigenous people should be interpreted by counting only the lands in possession on 5 October 1988, the date of promulgation of the Constitution.

<i>RE 635659</i> Ongoing case of the Supreme Court of Brazil

RE 635.659 was a case of the Supreme Court of Brazil concerning the decriminalization of drugs for personal use. The case's rapporteur, Gilmar Mendes, cast the initial vote in favor of decriminalization, and the majority of the Court agreed to decriminalize cannabis.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Bafômetro: multa a motorista que recusa teste é válida, decide STF". Rio de Janeiro Court of Justice (in Brazilian Portuguese). 20 May 2022. Retrieved 25 April 2024.
  2. 1 2 Maia, Flávia; Carneiro, Luiz Orlando (19 May 2022). "Lei Seca: STF mantém tolerância zero de bebida alcoólica e para quem recusa bafômetro". JOTA.info  [ pt ] (in Brazilian Portuguese). Retrieved 25 April 2024.