Relativistic dynamics

Last updated

For classical dynamics at relativistic speeds, see relativistic mechanics.

Contents

Relativistic dynamics refers to a combination of relativistic and quantum concepts to describe the relationships between the motion and properties of a relativistic system and the forces acting on the system. What distinguishes relativistic dynamics from other physical theories is the use of an invariant scalar evolution parameter to monitor the historical evolution of space-time events. In a scale-invariant theory, the strength of particle interactions does not depend on the energy of the particles involved. [1] Twentieth century experiments showed that the physical description of microscopic and submicroscopic objects moving at or near the speed of light raised questions about such fundamental concepts as space, time, mass, and energy. The theoretical description of the physical phenomena required the integration of concepts from relativity and quantum theory.

Vladimir Fock [2] was the first to propose an evolution parameter theory for describing relativistic quantum phenomena, but the evolution parameter theory introduced by Ernst Stueckelberg [3] [4] is more closely aligned with recent work. [5] [6] Evolution parameter theories were used by Feynman, [7] Schwinger [8] [9] and others to formulate quantum field theory in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Silvan S. Schweber [10] wrote a nice historical exposition of Feynman's investigation of such a theory. A resurgence of interest in evolution parameter theories began in the 1970s with the work of Horwitz and Piron, [11] and Fanchi and Collins. [12]

Invariant Evolution Parameter Concept

Some researchers view the evolution parameter as a mathematical artifact while others view the parameter as a physically measurable quantity. To understand the role of an evolution parameter and the fundamental difference between the standard theory and evolution parameter theories, it is necessary to review the concept of time.

Time t played the role of a monotonically increasing evolution parameter in classical Newtonian mechanics, as in the force law F = dP/dt for a non-relativistic, classical object with momentum P. To Newton, time was an “arrow” that parameterized the direction of evolution of a system.

Albert Einstein rejected the Newtonian concept and identified t as the fourth coordinate of a space-time four-vector. Einstein's view of time requires a physical equivalence between coordinate time and coordinate space. In this view, time should be a reversible coordinate in the same manner as space. Particles moving backward in time are often used to display antiparticles in Feynman-diagrams, but they are not thought of as really moving backward in time usually it is done to simplify notation. However a lot of people think they are really moving backward in time and take it as evidence for time reversibility.

The development of non-relativistic quantum mechanics in the early twentieth century preserved the Newtonian concept of time in the Schrödinger equation. The ability of non-relativistic quantum mechanics and special relativity to successfully describe observations motivated efforts to extend quantum concepts to the relativistic domain. Physicists had to decide what role time should play in relativistic quantum theory. The role of time was a key difference between Einsteinian and Newtonian views of classical theory. Two hypotheses that were consistent with special relativity were possible:

Hypothesis I

Assume t = Einsteinian time and reject Newtonian time.

Hypothesis II

Introduce two temporal variables:

Hypothesis I led to a relativistic probability conservation equation that is essentially a re-statement of the non-relativistic continuity equation. Time in the relativistic probability conservation equation is Einstein's time and is a consequence of implicitly adopting Hypothesis I. By adopting Hypothesis I, the standard paradigm has at its foundation a temporal paradox: motion relative to a single temporal variable must be reversible even though the second law of thermodynamics establishes an “arrow of time” for evolving systems, including relativistic systems. Thus, even though Einstein's time is reversible in the standard theory, the evolution of a system is not time reversal invariant. From the perspective of Hypothesis I, time must be both an irreversible arrow tied to entropy and a reversible coordinate in the Einsteinian sense. [13] The development of relativistic dynamics is motivated in part by the concern that Hypothesis I was too restrictive.

The problems associated with the standard formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics provide a clue to the validity of Hypothesis I. These problems included negative probabilities, hole theory, the Klein paradox, non-covariant expectation values, and so forth. [14] [15] [16] Most of these problems were never solved; they were avoided when quantum field theory (QFT) was adopted as the standard paradigm. The QFT perspective, particularly its formulation by Schwinger, is a subset of the more general Relativistic Dynamics. [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]

Relativistic Dynamics is based on Hypothesis II and employs two temporal variables: a coordinate time, and an evolution parameter. The evolution parameter, or parameterized time, may be viewed as a physically measurable quantity, and a procedure has been presented for designing evolution parameter clocks. [23] [24] By recognizing the existence of a distinct parameterized time and a distinct coordinate time, the conflict between a universal direction of time and a time that may proceed as readily from future to past as from past to future is resolved. The distinction between parameterized time and coordinate time removes ambiguities in the properties associated with the two temporal concepts in Relativistic Dynamics.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum mechanics</span> Description of physical properties at the atomic and subatomic scale

Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the behavior of nature at the scale of atoms and subatomic particles. It is the foundation of all quantum physics including quantum chemistry, quantum field theory, quantum technology, and quantum information science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum field theory</span> Theoretical framework

In theoretical physics, quantum field theory (QFT) is a theoretical framework that combines classical field theory, special relativity, and quantum mechanics. QFT is used in particle physics to construct physical models of subatomic particles and in condensed matter physics to construct models of quasiparticles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum electrodynamics</span> Quantum field theory of electromagnetism

In particle physics, quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the relativistic quantum field theory of electrodynamics. In essence, it describes how light and matter interact and is the first theory where full agreement between quantum mechanics and special relativity is achieved. QED mathematically describes all phenomena involving electrically charged particles interacting by means of exchange of photons and represents the quantum counterpart of classical electromagnetism giving a complete account of matter and light interaction.

Charge, parity, and time reversal symmetry is a fundamental symmetry of physical laws under the simultaneous transformations of charge conjugation (C), parity transformation (P), and time reversal (T). CPT is the only combination of C, P, and T that is observed to be an exact symmetry of nature at the fundamental level. The CPT theorem says that CPT symmetry holds for all physical phenomena, or more precisely, that any Lorentz invariant local quantum field theory with a Hermitian Hamiltonian must have CPT symmetry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julian Schwinger</span> American theoretical physicist (1918–1994)

Julian Seymour Schwinger was a Nobel Prize-winning American theoretical physicist. He is best known for his work on quantum electrodynamics (QED), in particular for developing a relativistically invariant perturbation theory, and for renormalizing QED to one loop order. Schwinger was a physics professor at several universities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shin'ichirō Tomonaga</span> Japanese physicist (1906-1979)

Shinichiro Tomonaga, usually cited as Sin-Itiro Tomonaga in English, was a Japanese physicist, influential in the development of quantum electrodynamics, work for which he was jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965 along with Richard Feynman and Julian Schwinger.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renormalization</span> Method in physics used to deal with infinities

Renormalization is a collection of techniques in quantum field theory, statistical field theory, and the theory of self-similar geometric structures, that are used to treat infinities arising in calculated quantities by altering values of these quantities to compensate for effects of their self-interactions. But even if no infinities arose in loop diagrams in quantum field theory, it could be shown that it would be necessary to renormalize the mass and fields appearing in the original Lagrangian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean-Pierre Vigier</span>

Jean-Pierre Vigier was a French theoretical physicist, known for his work on the foundations of physics, in particular on his stochastic interpretation of quantum physics.

The classical limit or correspondence limit is the ability of a physical theory to approximate or "recover" classical mechanics when considered over special values of its parameters. The classical limit is used with physical theories that predict non-classical behavior.

In theoretical physics, Pauli–Villars regularization (P–V) is a procedure that isolates divergent terms from finite parts in loop calculations in field theory in order to renormalize the theory. Wolfgang Pauli and Felix Villars published the method in 1949, based on earlier work by Richard Feynman, Ernst Stueckelberg and Dominique Rivier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of quantum field theory</span>

In particle physics, the history of quantum field theory starts with its creation by Paul Dirac, when he attempted to quantize the electromagnetic field in the late 1920s. Major advances in the theory were made in the 1940s and 1950s, leading to the introduction of renormalized quantum electrodynamics (QED). The field theory behind QED was so accurate and successful in predictions that efforts were made to apply the same basic concepts for the other forces of nature. Beginning in 1954, the parallel was found by way of gauge theory, leading by the late 1970s, to quantum field models of strong nuclear force and weak nuclear force, united in the modern Standard Model of particle physics.

The Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory, named after its originators, the physicists, Richard Feynman, and John Archibald Wheeler, is an theory of electrodynamics based on a relativistic correct extension of action at a distance electron particles. The theory postulates no independent field.

In physical cosmology, cosmological perturbation theory is the theory by which the evolution of structure is understood in the Big Bang model. Cosmological perturbation theory may be broken into two categories: Newtonian or general relativistic. Each case uses its governing equations to compute gravitational and pressure forces which cause small perturbations to grow and eventually seed the formation of stars, quasars, galaxies and clusters. Both cases apply only to situations where the universe is predominantly homogeneous, such as during cosmic inflation and large parts of the Big Bang. The universe is believed to still be homogeneous enough that the theory is a good approximation on the largest scales, but on smaller scales more involved techniques, such as N-body simulations, must be used. When deciding whether to use general relativity for perturbation theory, note that Newtonian physics is only applicable in some cases such as for scales smaller than the Hubble horizon, where spacetime is sufficiently flat, and for which speeds are non-relativistic.

Objective-collapse theories, also known as models of spontaneous wave function collapse or dynamical reduction models, are proposed solutions to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. As with other theories called interpretations of quantum mechanics, they are possible explanations of why and how quantum measurements always give definite outcomes, not a superposition of them as predicted by the Schrödinger equation, and more generally how the classical world emerges from quantum theory. The fundamental idea is that the unitary evolution of the wave function describing the state of a quantum system is approximate. It works well for microscopic systems, but progressively loses its validity when the mass / complexity of the system increases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feynman checkerboard</span> Fermion path integral approach in 1+1 dimensions

The Feynman checkerboard, or relativistic chessboard model, was Richard Feynman’s sum-over-paths formulation of the kernel for a free spin-½ particle moving in one spatial dimension. It provides a representation of solutions of the Dirac equation in (1+1)-dimensional spacetime as discrete sums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light front quantization</span> Technique in computational quantum field theory

The light-front quantization of quantum field theories provides a useful alternative to ordinary equal-time quantization. In particular, it can lead to a relativistic description of bound systems in terms of quantum-mechanical wave functions. The quantization is based on the choice of light-front coordinates, where plays the role of time and the corresponding spatial coordinate is . Here, is the ordinary time, is one Cartesian coordinate, and is the speed of light. The other two Cartesian coordinates, and , are untouched and often called transverse or perpendicular, denoted by symbols of the type . The choice of the frame of reference where the time and -axis are defined can be left unspecified in an exactly soluble relativistic theory, but in practical calculations some choices may be more suitable than others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superfluid vacuum theory</span> Theory of fundamental physics

Superfluid vacuum theory (SVT), sometimes known as the BEC vacuum theory, is an approach in theoretical physics and quantum mechanics where the fundamental physical vacuum is considered as a superfluid or as a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC).

The two-state vector formalism (TSVF) is a description of quantum mechanics in terms of a causal relation in which the present is caused by quantum states of the past and of the future taken in combination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-body Dirac equations</span> Quantum field theory equations

In quantum field theory, and in the significant subfields of quantum electrodynamics (QED) and quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the two-body Dirac equations (TBDE) of constraint dynamics provide a three-dimensional yet manifestly covariant reformulation of the Bethe–Salpeter equation for two spin-1/2 particles. Such a reformulation is necessary since without it, as shown by Nakanishi, the Bethe–Salpeter equation possesses negative-norm solutions arising from the presence of an essentially relativistic degree of freedom, the relative time. These "ghost" states have spoiled the naive interpretation of the Bethe–Salpeter equation as a quantum mechanical wave equation. The two-body Dirac equations of constraint dynamics rectify this flaw. The forms of these equations can not only be derived from quantum field theory they can also be derived purely in the context of Dirac's constraint dynamics and relativistic mechanics and quantum mechanics. Their structures, unlike the more familiar two-body Dirac equation of Breit, which is a single equation, are that of two simultaneous quantum relativistic wave equations. A single two-body Dirac equation similar to the Breit equation can be derived from the TBDE. Unlike the Breit equation, it is manifestly covariant and free from the types of singularities that prevent a strictly nonperturbative treatment of the Breit equation. In applications of the TBDE to QED, the two particles interact by way of four-vector potentials derived from the field theoretic electromagnetic interactions between the two particles. In applications to QCD, the two particles interact by way of four-vector potentials and Lorentz invariant scalar interactions, derived in part from the field theoretic chromomagnetic interactions between the quarks and in part by phenomenological considerations. As with the Breit equation a sixteen-component spinor Ψ is used.

Lawrence S. Schulman is an American-Israeli physicist known for his work on path integrals, quantum measurement theory and statistical mechanics. He introduced topology into path integrals on multiply connected spaces and has contributed to diverse areas from galactic morphology to the arrow of time.

References

  1. Flego, Silvana; Plastino, Angelo; Plastino, Angel Ricardo (2011-12-20). "Information Theory Consequences of the Scale-Invariance of Schröedinger's Equation". Entropy. MDPI AG. 13 (12): 2049–2058. Bibcode:2011Entrp..13.2049F. doi: 10.3390/e13122049 . ISSN   1099-4300.
  2. Fock, V.A. (1937): Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 12, 404.
  3. Stueckelberg, E.C.G. (1941): Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 322, 588.
  4. Stueckelberg, E.C.G. (1942): Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 23.
  5. Fanchi, J. R. (1993). "Review of invariant time formulations of relativistic quantum theories". Foundations of Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 23 (3): 487–548. Bibcode:1993FoPh...23..487F. doi:10.1007/bf01883726. ISSN   0015-9018. S2CID   120073749.
  6. Fanchi, J.R. (2003): “The Relativistic Quantum Potential and Non-Locality,” published in Horizons in World Physics, 240, Edited by Albert Reimer, (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York), pp 117-159.
  7. Feynman, R. P. (1950-11-01). "Mathematical Formulation of the Quantum Theory of Electromagnetic Interaction" (PDF). Physical Review. American Physical Society (APS). 80 (3): 440–457. Bibcode:1950PhRv...80..440F. doi:10.1103/physrev.80.440. ISSN   0031-899X.
  8. Schwinger, Julian (1951-06-01). "On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization". Physical Review. American Physical Society (APS). 82 (5): 664–679. Bibcode:1951PhRv...82..664S. doi:10.1103/physrev.82.664. ISSN   0031-899X.
  9. Schwinger, Julian (1951-06-15). "The Theory of Quantized Fields. I". Physical Review. American Physical Society (APS). 82 (6): 914–927. Bibcode:1951PhRv...82..914S. doi:10.1103/physrev.82.914. ISSN   0031-899X. S2CID   121971249.
  10. Schweber, Silvan S. (1986-04-01). "Feynman and the visualization of space-time processes". Reviews of Modern Physics. American Physical Society (APS). 58 (2): 449–508. Bibcode:1986RvMP...58..449S. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.449. ISSN   0034-6861.
  11. Horwitz, L.P. and C. Piron (1973): Helv. Phys. Acta 46, 316.
  12. Fanchi, John R.; Collins, R. Eugene (1978). "Quantum mechanics of relativistic spinless particles". Foundations of Physics. Springer Nature. 8 (11–12): 851–877. Bibcode:1978FoPh....8..851F. doi:10.1007/bf00715059. ISSN   0015-9018. S2CID   120601267.
  13. Horwitz, L.P.; Shashoua, S.; Schieve, W.C. (1989). "A manifestly covariant relativistic Boltzmann equation for the evolution of a system of events". Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. Elsevier BV. 161 (2): 300–338. Bibcode:1989PhyA..161..300H. doi:10.1016/0378-4371(89)90471-8. ISSN   0378-4371.
  14. Fanchi, J.R. (1993): Parametrized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
  15. Weinberg, S. (1995): Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I (Cambridge University Press, New York).
  16. Prugovečki, Eduard (1994). "On foundational and geometric critical aspects of quantum electrodynamics". Foundations of Physics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 24 (3): 335–362. Bibcode:1994FoPh...24..335P. doi:10.1007/bf02058096. ISSN   0015-9018. S2CID   121653916.
  17. Fanchi, John R. (1979-12-15). "A generalized quantum field theory". Physical Review D. American Physical Society (APS). 20 (12): 3108–3119. Bibcode:1979PhRvD..20.3108F. doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.3108. ISSN   0556-2821.
  18. Fanchi, J.R. (1993): Parametrized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
  19. Pavšič, Matej (1991). "On the interpretation of the relativistic quantum mechanics with invariant evolution parameter". Foundations of Physics. Springer Nature. 21 (9): 1005–1019. Bibcode:1991FoPh...21.1005P. doi:10.1007/bf00733384. ISSN   0015-9018. S2CID   119436518.
  20. Pavšič, M. (1991). "Relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory with invariant evolution parameter". Il Nuovo Cimento A. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 104 (9): 1337–1354. Bibcode:1991NCimA.104.1337P. doi:10.1007/bf02789576. ISSN   0369-3546. S2CID   122902647.
  21. Pavšič, Matej (2001). "Clifford-Algebra Based Polydimensional Relativity and Relativistic Dynamics". Foundations of Physics. 31 (8): 1185–1209. arXiv: hep-th/0011216 . doi:10.1023/a:1017599804103. ISSN   0015-9018. S2CID   117429211.
  22. Pavsič, M. (2001): The Landscape of Theoretical Physics: A Global View (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
  23. Fanchi, John R. (1986-09-01). "Parametrizing relativistic quantum mechanics". Physical Review A. American Physical Society (APS). 34 (3): 1677–1681. Bibcode:1986PhRvA..34.1677F. doi:10.1103/physreva.34.1677. ISSN   0556-2791. PMID   9897446.
  24. Fanchi, J.R. (1993): Parametrized Relativistic Quantum Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht)