Repopulation of wolves in Midwestern United States

Last updated

Gray wolf photographed by the USFWS Midwest Region. Gray Wolf (6545954933).jpg
Gray wolf photographed by the USFWS Midwest Region.

Grey wolves were considered extirpated from the conterminous United States in the 1940s, but some survived in the remote northeastern corner of Minnesota. After they were listed as an endangered species, they naturally expanded into many of the habitats in the Midwestern states of Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin they had previously occupied. These three states are estimated to have a stable population of 4,400 wolves. The western Great Lakes region they inhabit includes the forested areas of these states, along with the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and Ontario. In 1978, wolves were protected under the federal Endangered Species Act as it was determined that they were in danger of going extinct and needed protection to aid their recovery. Management under the Act allowed the remaining wolves in Minnesota to flourish and repopulate northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Wolves were removed from federal protection in January 2021 with management authority remaining with state and tribal authorities. Management plans guide each state's decisions about wolf regulations for hunting, trapping, and culling along with population monitoring, and livestock damage control. In February 2022, a judge ordered federal protections for gray wolves to be restored under the Federal Endangered Species Act which returned management authority to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Contents

Expansion under federal protection

Wild wolves became locally extinct from shooting, trapping, and poisoning, with support from government bounty programs. [1] A bounty was put on wolves in 1865 in Wisconsin and they were thought to be completely eradicated from the state by 1960. [2] In the 1960s and 1970s, national awareness of environmental issues and consequences led to the passage of laws designed to correct the mistakes of the past and help prevent similar mistakes in the future. [3] While wolves were considered extirpated in every other state except for Alaska, they survived in a remote northeastern corner of Minnesota of sub-boreal forests and lakes. [4] Wolves in the United States were protected under the federal Endangered Species Act in 1978 as they were in danger of going extinct and needed protection to aid their recovery. [5] Known as timber wolves, the few hundred animals in dozens of packs remaining in Minnesota and Ontario began to naturally disperse through their historic habitat in the western Great Lakes forests under the protected status. [6] Under protected status, wolves can only be killed when human life is at risk. [7] Wolves in Minnesota were soon listed as threatened. This allowed limited, targeted trapping of wolves by the U.S. Department of Agriculture near where pets and livestock have been killed. That program has killed about 200 wolves each year while the endangered listing in Wisconsin and Michigan did not allow lethal control. [4]

Wisconsin listed the gray wolf as a state endangered species in 1975 when it appeared that wolves, native to Wisconsin, were beginning to repopulate the state. [8] The state issued its first Wolf Recovery Plan in 1985. [9] Development continued to 1989, which set a population of 80 for three consecutive years as the trigger to reclassify the wolf to threatened status. Having reached that goal in 1999 with a population of 197, the state adopted the Wisconsin Wolf Management Plan for guidance towards eventual delisting. [10] In 2003, the status of wolves in Wisconsin moved down to threatened rather than endangered. The known population in 2004 was 335 which included 8 on Indian reservations. [11] The state plan was updated in 2007 when there were about 550 wolves in Wisconsin. [12] Michigan Department of Natural Resources’s principal goals set in 2008 include maintaining a viable wolf population, facilitating wolf-related benefits, minimizing wolf-related conflicts and conducting “science-based and socially acceptable management of wolves”. [13] Michigan removed wolves from the state's list of threatened and endangered species in 2009 having reached the recovery goal of 200 for five consecutive years in 2004. [1] In 2012, FWS issued a rule that classified and delisted a sub-species called the Western Great Lakes wolves under the federal Endangered Species Act. [14] In response, Wisconsin enacted a law requiring a hunting season while the wolf population had reached 800. Minnesota and Wisconsin held wolf harvest seasons in 2012, 2013, and 2014. [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] Michigan had a legal wolf hunt in 2013 only. [1] Wolves were returned to the list of federally threatened species in December 2014 as a result of a court ruling that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not fully address the impact that the extraction would have on the remaining wolves in the country. [14]

Migration

Wolves have naturally migrated in the three state region. As of 2021, the estimated stable population is 4,400 in the three states. [20] Wolves may also disperse across the Great Plains into this region from the northern Rocky Mountain region which includes Wyoming with approximately 300 wolves and Colorado with a small population. [21] [22] In Midwestern states without resident packs, state authorities may perform biological genetic testing to determine the origin of the wolf when coyote hunters or ranchers self-report suspected wolf killings. Since wolves were extirpated in Nebraska in the early 1900s, there has been three instance of confirmed wolf presence as of 2021. The first was in 2002 and all the dispersers have been from the Great Lakes region. [23] There are four known cases of wolves being shot by coyote hunters in Iowa since 2014. [21] Evidence shows that from one to five wolves pass through the state each year. [24] A few gray wolves have also been reported in South Dakota on both sides of the Missouri River. [21] A wolf with a mixture of Great Lakes, Northwest Territories, and eastern gray wolf strains was confirmed in New York in 2022. [25]

Removal of federal endangered species status

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service removed gray wolves’ endangered species status at the beginning of January 2021 when more than 6,000 wolves were living in nine states. [17] [18] The USFWS determined that the wolves in a suitable position to be taken off of the list, writing " “We propose this action because the best available scientific and commercial information indicates that the currently listed entities do not meet the definitions of a threatened species or endangered species under the Act due to recovery”. [26] The delisting was challenged in federal court by wildlife advocates in response to aggressive hunting laws enacted in states like Montana and Idaho. [27] [28] Officials in those states were responding to periodic attacks on livestock and perceived reduced numbers of elk and deer that many hunters blame on the wolves. [29] At the November 2021 hearing, a federal judge focused on a particular issue; Were wolves properly classified under the endangered act prior to losing their protected status last year? [30] The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is required to monitor for five years the population of any species it removes from the endangered species list. The post-delisting monitoring plan says wolves have to be doing well in Minnesota and Wisconsin for the species to continue to be delisted. [31]

State and tribal management

After federal wolf protection ended, the states and tribes again became responsible to manage the animal and regulate hunting. [32] [33] Wildlife management attempts to balance the needs of wildlife with the needs of people using the best available science. [34] Management plans can provide a framework to guide each state's decisions about wolf regulations for hunting, trapping, and culling along with population monitoring, management, damage control, education, research and other issues. [4] Some state governments welcomed the delisting as they have long sought the ability to manage wolves including controlling their numbers through hunting and trapping. [27] The delisting has been supported by the Department of Natural Resources of Michigan as wolves have met and exceeded the biological recovery goals that would necessitate protection. [35]

Anishinaabe people and the grey wolf

According to Anishinaabe tradition, The Creator gave “Ma'iingan,” (the wolf) to the First Man as a friend and companion. The wolf is a fundamental component of kinship and identity for Anishinaabe people. [36] They view the wolf as a relative, a brother. [37] The wolf is ingrained in the Anishinaabe people's soul and identity through legends, clan membership, and culture (other Indigenous Nations have their own, and sometimes different relationship with the wolf). The wolf is not only a relative for the Anishinaabe people, [38] but a being whose fate is intertwined with that of the Anishinaabe. Due to treaty rights, there was a tribal and state agreement made in 2011 that any wolf-related committee established by the state must include tribal members [39] Anishinaabe people hold the strong belief that their treaty rights extend to their right to protect wolves in the region. In February 2021, when federal protection of wolves was removed, insufficient measures remained in place to preserve wolf populations in the midwest, resulting in the hunting of large numbers of wolves. Not only was this damaging to Anishinaabe cultural and spiritual values, but threatened resources that tribes were dependent on. [37]

Minnesota

Minnesota has one of the densest wolf populations in the lower 48 states. [40] By September 2018, the state had exceeded 2,000 wolves for at least 20 years when the midwinter survey put the population at 2,655 wolves with 465 packs. [17] with the last management plan in Minnesota having been produced in 2001, Minnesota convened a technical committee in 2020 as they began the update to ensure the long-term survival of wolves in Minnesota while addressing wolf-human conflicts. [41] The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources decided there would be no hunting or trapping season in 2021 while the management plan was being updated . [42] A draft update was released in June 2022. [43] Minnesota divided the state into two zones. [44] The northeast zone would have more protections for the wolves than the rest of the state which would have more flexibility to manage the population. [45]

Michigan

In 2023, Michigan had an estimated 630 wolves, all in the Upper Peninsula. [46] Spread among 143 packs, that figure had been holding steady for several years. [20] The wolves on Isle Royale, Michigan, in Lake Superior are considered separately and are not included in the count for the state. [1] The Michigan DNR Wolf Management Advisory Council began meeting in August 2021 and plans to provide input on a management plan in May 2022. [47] Native American tribes will also be consulted on wolf management. [48] The management plan was last updated in 2015 and a date for renewed hunting has not been set although the state legislature urged them to have one soon. [49] [20]

Wisconsin

Wisconsin counted over 1,000 wolves with 256 packs in 2020. [50] With the increasing population and improved understanding of population dynamics, an update to the Wisconsin wolf management plan process was initiated in 2021. [51] The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) is required by state law to set a wolf hunt season to be held between November and February if the animals are not listed as endangered (federal or state). [50] They set the initial hunt for November 2021 which would have allowed time to assess the wolf population, receive public input, consult with the Native American tribes and prepare a plan. Also pups born in the spring would have a chance to grow. [52] After an informational committee meeting on January 13, 2021, twelve elected officials sent a letter to the Natural Resources Board stating that the consensus was that wolves in Wisconsin need to be hunted now. [53] Legislators were concerned that they might be quickly put back on the federal endangered species list through a legal challenge. [54] A court ordered season did open at the end of February after the November date was challenged by an out-of-state hunter advocacy group. The hunt, hastily organized on two weeks’ notice, was based on the state law requiring a season when wolves were not listed. [55] Based on an estimated population of about 1,000 wolves, the department set the quota at 200 outside of reservation lands. [56] Of these, 119 wolves were allocated to the state and 81 were allocated to the Ojibwe tribes since treaty rights are taken into consideration within the Ceded Territory, essentially the northern one-third of Wisconsin. [57] The tribes consider the wolf culturally and spiritually important and place a high value on the ecological role of the species. [37] [58] They choose to not issue licenses for their allotted quota of recreational hunting. [59] Tribes are generally open to responsible killing when wolves threaten domesticated animals. [60] The season ended prematurely on February 23 after four days with hunters with state licenses killing 216 wolves. [61] As the quota was clearly being exceeded, the closure still had to wait for 24 hours after the notice before closing a wolf hunting zone. [59] Dogs were used in 86% of the wolves kills under conditions the WDNR described as ideal for tracking as wolf packs were breeding and leaving scent and tracks as they patrolled their territories. [62] The law's 24-hour notice requirement prior to closing the season, the high number of licenses sold and the use of hunting hounds made it difficult to properly manage the hunt according to the WDNR. [63] Researchers estimate that nearly one third of the state's total wolf population was reduced. [64] [65] They included estimated natural deaths and unreported kills such as poaching which they think increased after wolves were delisted. A WDNR official noted that the one third estimate did not account for any births that followed the spring hunt. [66] The WDNR considered the 200 a conservative number in keeping with their intent to keep the population level stable. [62] Wolves reproduce only once a year, usually between January and March. Scientists say that the 38 breeding-age females killed likely included those that were pregnant or nursing. [66]

In response to the February hunt in Wisconsin, the Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Commission, a treaty rights group representing 11 Ojibwe tribes in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan, sent a letter requesting that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service reconsider the decision to delist wolves. [31] They also opposed the second 2021 Wisconsin hunt that was scheduled for November 6. [59] They thought the "modest population" should be given time to recover from the "brutal hunt in February during the wolves' breeding season". [58] The WDNR scientists proposed a 130-wolf limit for the fall season. [67] The National Resources Board (NRB), which is the policy-setting board for the WDNR, approved a quota of up to 300 wolves. [66] Scientists recommended a lower number as the swift removal of wolves from the state twice in one year would likely harm their natural reproduction process. [64] [65] The Ojibwe tribes seek to protect the wolves and contend that the NRB has willfully acted to nullify the Ojibwe Tribes’ share by approving the higher quota. [68] Six Ojibwe tribes filed a lawsuit in federal court in September saying that in setting the quota the NRB purposefully and knowingly discriminated against the Ojibwe Tribes by acting to nullify their share and that the board failed to use sound biological principles in establishing the quota. [69] The WDNR went with their original 130-wolf limit determination. [70] Ojibwe tribes claimed 56 of the quota in the Ceded Territory for the fall 2021 season. [71] Non-tribal hunters were allocated 74 wolves total amongst the six zones within the state. [72] A temporary injunction, issued on October 22 in a legal challenge brought by coalition of wildlife advocacy groups, halted the season two weeks before it was set to begin. The Dane County Circuit Court judge stated that the WDNR had failed to create permanent regulations enacting the law which created the hunting season. [73] While the law is constitutional on its face, the department must follow the regulatory process. The WDNR must implement updated regulations on determining quotas and the number of licenses it issues and complete the ongoing update to the wolf management plan with new wolf population goals in order for the injunction to be lifted. [74] The six Ojibwe tribes, that had filed a lawsuit in September, requested and failed to get the federal judge to issue a preliminary injunction to prevent the state from holding a hunt in the event the temporary injunction is overturned on appeal. [75]

Return of federal protection

In February 2022, a judge has ordered federal protections for gray wolves to be restored under the Federal Endangered Species Act. [76] The state of Wisconsin announced that the state is no longer allowed to have a wolf-hunting season. Permits that had been issued to landowners experiencing wolf conflicts were no longer valid for the lethal removal of wolves. [77] The WDNR in 2022 conducted a social science survey of public attitudes toward wolves in Wisconsin as part of the update of the wolf management plan. [78] A draft plan was released in November 2022 for public comments. [79] The setting of a hard population limit was important for some legislators and members of the public. [80] The new management plan was approved in October 2023 without a population goal. [81] With a recommended statewide population of about 1,000 wolves, the plan instead outlines a process called adaptive management that focuses on ensuring there is a healthy population while also being responsive when conflicts arise. [82] [83]

Research and the role of wolves in ecosystems

The presence of wolves was found to reduce deer-vehicle collisions in a study published in 2021. [84] The two factors were the thinning of the deer population by wolves and behavior changes in fearful deer who avoided roads that wolves may be using. [85]

Wolves are apex predators. With their place at the top of the food chain, they are connected to larger ecological processes. Wolves allow certain forests to remain undisturbed by beavers through their presence and predation. A study published in 2023 found that beavers were more likely to be killed by wolves the farther they ventured away from ponds in search of food. This limited the extent of the conifer zone around ponds where deciduous trees—beavers' preferred food—had been mostly removed. [86]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Upper Peninsula of Michigan</span> Northern major peninsula of the U.S. state of Michigan

The Upper Peninsulaof Michigan—also known as Upper Michigan or colloquially the U.P.—is the northern and more elevated of the two major landmasses that make up the U.S. state of Michigan; it is separated from the Lower Peninsula by the Straits of Mackinac. It is bounded primarily by Lake Superior to the north, separated from the Canadian province of Ontario at the east end by the St. Marys River, and flanked by Lake Huron and Lake Michigan along much of its south. Although the peninsula extends as a geographic feature into the state of Wisconsin, the state boundary follows the Montreal and Menominee rivers and a line connecting them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians</span> Indian tribe in Wisconsin, United States

The Bad River LaPointe Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians or Bad River Tribe for short are a federally recognized tribe of Ojibwe people. The tribe had 6,945 members as of 2010. The Bad River Reservation is located on the south shore of Lake Superior and has a land area of about 193.11 square miles (500.15 km2) in northern Wisconsin, straddling Ashland and Iron counties. Odanah, the administrative and cultural center, is located five miles (8.0 km) east of the town of Ashland on U.S. Highway 2. The reservation population was 1,545 in 2020. Most of the reservation is managed as undeveloped forest and wetland, providing a habitat for wild rice and other natural resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians</span> Ethnic group

The Lac Courte Oreilles Tribe is one of six federally recognized bands of Ojibwe people located in present-day Wisconsin. It had 7,275 enrolled members as of 2010. The band is based at the Lac Courte Oreilles Indian Reservation in northwestern Wisconsin, which surrounds Lac Courte Oreilles. The main reservation's land is in west-central Sawyer County, but two small plots of off-reservation trust land are located in Rusk, Burnett, and Washburn counties. The reservation was established in 1854 by the second Treaty of La Pointe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolf hunting</span> Practice of hunting wolves by humans

Wolf hunting is the practice of hunting wolves. Wolves are mainly hunted for sport, for their skins, to protect livestock and, in some rare cases, to protect humans. Wolves have been actively hunted since 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, when they first began to pose a threat to livestock of Neolithic human communities. Historically, the hunting of wolves was a huge capital- and manpower-intensive operation. The threat wolves posed to both livestock and people was considered significant enough to warrant the conscription of whole villages under threat of punishment, despite the disruption of economic activities and reduced taxes. The hunting of gray wolves, while originally actively endorsed in many countries, has become a controversial issue across the globe. Most people see it as cruel, unnecessary and based on misconceptions, while proponents argue that it is vital for the conservation of game herds and as pest control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexican wolf</span> Subspecies of grey wolf

The Mexican wolf, also known as the lobo mexicano is a subspecies of gray wolf native to eastern and southeastern Arizona and western and southern New Mexico and fragmented areas of northern Mexico. Historically, the subspecies ranged from eastern Southern California south into Baja California, east through the Sonora and Chihuahua Deserts and into West Texas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolf reintroduction</span> Reestablishment of extirpated native wolves

Wolf reintroduction involves the reintroduction of a portion of grey wolves in areas where native wolves have been extirpated. More than 30 subspecies of Canis lupus have been recognized, and grey wolves, as colloquially understood, comprise nondomestic/feral subspecies. Reintroduction is only considered where large tracts of suitable wilderness still exist and where certain prey species are abundant enough to support a predetermined wolf population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources</span> Government agency of Wisconsin, US

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) is a government agency of the U.S. state of Wisconsin charged with conserving and managing Wisconsin's natural resources. The Wisconsin Natural Resources Board has the authority to set policy for the WDNR. The WDNR is led by the Secretary, who is appointed by the Governor of Wisconsin. The WDNR develops regulations and guidance in accordance with laws passed by the Wisconsin Legislature. It administers wildlife, fish, forests, endangered resources, air, water, waste, and other issues related to natural resources. The central office of the WDNR is located in downtown Madison, near the state capitol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hunting license</span> Regulatory or legal mechanism to control hunting

A hunting license or hunting permit is a regulatory or legal mechanism to control hunting, both commercial and recreational. A license specifically made for recreational hunting is sometimes called a game license.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colorado Parks and Wildlife</span>

Colorado Parks and Wildlife manages the state parks system and the wildlife of the U.S. state of Colorado. Responsibilities include state parks, wildlife areas, and the Colorado Natural Areas Program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crex Meadows</span> State Wildlife Area in Burnett County, Wisconsin

The Crex Meadows Wildlife Area consists of marshes, wetlands, brush prairies, and forests. Crex Meadows is located near the village of Grantsburg, Wisconsin, in Burnett County, Wisconsin. Its 30,000 acres (120 km2) are home to 270 species of birds and 600 species of plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of wolves in Yellowstone</span> Extirpation and reintroduction of the gray wolf to Yellowstone National Park

The history of wolves in Yellowstone includes the extirpation, absence and reintroduction of wild populations of the gray wolf to Yellowstone National Park and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. When the park was created in 1872, wolf populations were already in decline in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho. The creation of the national park did not provide protection for wolves or other predators, and government predator control programs in the first decades of the 1900s essentially helped eliminate the gray wolf from Yellowstone. The last wolves were killed in Yellowstone in 1926. After that, sporadic reports of wolves still occurred, but scientists confirmed in the mid-1900s that sustainable gray wolf populations had been extirpated and were absent from Yellowstone as well as 48 states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Rocky Mountain wolf</span> Subspecies of carnivore

The northern Rocky Mountain wolf, also known as the northern Rocky Mountain timber wolf, is a subspecies of gray wolf native to the northern Rocky Mountains. It is a light-colored, medium to large-sized subspecies with a narrow, flattened frontal bone. The subspecies was initially listed as Endangered on March 9, 1978, but had the classification removed in the year 2000 due to the effects of the Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery Plan. On August 6, 2010, the northern Rocky Mountain wolf was ordered to be returned under Endangered Species Act protections by U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in a decision overturning a previous ruling by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They were later removed on August 31, 2012 from the list because of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming meeting the population quotas for the species to be considered stable. This wolf is recognized as a subspecies of Canis lupus in the taxonomic authority Mammal Species of the World (2005).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental issues in Wyoming</span>

The U.S. state of Wyoming faces a broad array of environmental issues stemming from natural resource extraction, species extirpation, non-native species introduction, and pollution. Wildlife species that have been affected by these issues include:

An out-of-danger species is an animal or plant species formerly categorized as Rare, Vulnerable, or Endangered that has since been removed from these lists because the species' survival has been relatively secured, e.g. Ginkgo biloba. Often known as a delisted species, these animals have been moved out of the Rare, Vulnerable, or Endangered categories through conservation efforts and government policymaking to ensure their survival and population growth. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) established its list of endangered species in 1964, subsequently becoming a global authority on wildlife conservation. The following year, the United States created the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to act as a federal authority on endangered species. Currently, both international and domestic organizations implement recovery efforts and track species' population growth, delisting when necessary. Removing a species from the endangered species list is generally a slow process; most organizations and governments require long periods of observation both before and after delisting. There have been numerous efforts to delist endangered species, with both international and country-wide recovery plans being regularly implemented. These programs have led to the recovery of dozens of species, but their overall effectiveness remains contested.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolf distribution</span> Species distribution of Canis lupus

Wolf distribution is the species distribution of the wolf. Originally, wolves occurred in Eurasia above the 12th parallel north and in North America above the 15th parallel north. However, deliberate human persecution has reduced the species' range to about one-third, because of livestock predation and fear of wolf attacks on humans. The species is now extirpated in much of Western Europe, Mexico, and the contiguous United States, and completely from the British Isles and the Japanese archipelago. In modern history, the gray wolf occurs mostly in wilderness and remote areas, particularly in Canada, Alaska, the Northern United States, Europe and Asia from about the 75th parallel north to the 12th parallel north. Wolf population declines have been arrested since the 1970s, and have fostered recolonization and reintroduction in parts of its former range, due to legal protection, changes in land-use and rural human population shifts to cities. Competition with humans for livestock and game species, concerns over the danger posed by wolves to people, and habitat fragmentation pose a continued threat to the species. Despite these threats, because of the gray wolf's relatively widespread range and stable population, it is classified as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List. In Africa the population of wolves is limited to the northern regions with the African golden wolf north of the Sahara and the Ethiopian wolf in Ethiopia.

In the 1940s, the gray wolf was nearly eradicated from the Southern Rockies. The species naturally expanded into habitats in Colorado they occupied prior to its near extirpation from the conterminous United States. Wolves were reintroduced in the northern Rocky Mountains in the 1990s and since at least 2014, solitary wolves have entered Colorado. A resident group in northwestern Colorado was confirmed in early 2020. In June 2021, Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) reported that the first litter of wolf pups had been born in the state since the 1940s. Voters narrowly approved a November 2020 ballot measure that directed the commission that oversees CPW to develop a plan to begin to reintroduce wolves by the end of 2023, somewhere on the Western Slope. The wolves would be managed and designated as a non-game species, meaning they cannot be hunted, with fair compensation being offered for any livestock killed by the predators. Wolves were protected as they are listed as endangered under federal and state law. As part of the reintroduction effort, the federal government in 2023 granted Colorado the authority to manage and kill wolves in specific circumstances. Colorado wildlife officials released 10 gray wolves from Oregon into a remote forest in Grand and Summit counties in late December 2023 as Colorado became the first state where voters directed the reintroduction of gray wolves rather than the federal government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Colorado Proposition 114</span>

Colorado Proposition 114 was a ballot measure that was approved in Colorado in the November 2020 elections. It was a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf back into the state. The proposition was passed with a narrow margin, making Colorado the first US state to pass legislation to reintroduce wildlife.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Powell Marsh Wildlife Area</span> Protected area in northern Wisconsin, US

The Powell Marsh Wildlife Area is a 4,850-acre (19.6 km2) tract of protected land located in Vilas and Iron counties, Wisconsin, owned and partially managed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). The nearby Dead Pike Lake has drawn attention to the wildlife area from conservators and homeowners nearby due to surface and groundwater flows shared between the two, with man-made structures in the latter harming the water quality of the lake.

The Swan Lake Wildlife Area is a 2,466 acres (998 ha) tract of protected land located in Columbia County, Wisconsin, managed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). Land to be used for the wildlife area was first acquired in 1963 to provide for hunting and other outdoor recreational activities in the county. In addition to outdoor recreation activities, the wildlife area was established to protect the Fox River watershed.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 Flesher, John (July 27, 2020). "Michigan wolf population at nearly 700 but leveling off". AP News. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  2. ↑ Thoresen, Katie (September 22, 2020). "Wisconsin Wolf Population Tops 1,100, Tiffany Introduces Legislation to Delist Wolves". WXPR. Retrieved December 22, 2021.
  3. ↑ PD-icon.svg This article incorporates public domain material from Wolf Restoration - Yellowstone National Park. U.S. National Park Service. Retrieved May 18, 2023.
  4. 1 2 3 Myers, John (October 28, 2020). "Feds to announce wolf delisting Thursday in Minnesota". Duluth News Tribune. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  5. ↑ Rott, Nathan (October 29, 2020). "Gray Wolves To Be Removed From Endangered Species List". Milwaukee: WUWM. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  6. ↑ Kraker, Dan (October 30, 2020). "Gray wolves lose federal protection; state will manage instead". MPR News. Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  7. ↑ Flesher, John (August 2, 2017). "Court keeps Great Lakes wolves on endangered species list". Chicago Tribune. Associated Press. Retrieved May 3, 2021.
  8. ↑ U.S. Department of Agriculture (2006) , p. 10
  9. ↑ Manges, Eric (February 27, 2024). "Wolves and Wisconsin: Separating fact from fiction". FOX6 News Milwaukee. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  10. ↑ Wisconsin DNR (1999) , p. 3
  11. ↑ Gorman, James (March 16, 2004). "Wolves Come Back (On Their Terms)". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved May 7, 2021.
  12. ↑ "Wolf Management Plan". Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved April 20, 2021.
  13. ↑ McWhirter, Sheri (February 23, 2022). "Wolves are endangered again, but pressure for a Michigan hunt remains". MLive. Retrieved February 25, 2022.
  14. 1 2 Ostrowski, Carter (January 22, 2021). "Are Gray Wolves Ready to be Delisted as an Endangered Species?". University of Cincinnati Law Review. Retrieved June 21, 2021.
  15. ↑ Myers, John (December 19, 2014). "Court order puts Great Lakes wolves back on endangered species list". Duluth News Tribune. Retrieved April 28, 2021.
  16. ↑ Kraker, Dan (October 24, 2012). "Minn. ranchers laud wolf hunt, but say it won't help save livestock". MPR News. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
  17. 1 2 3 Kraker, Dan (March 15, 2019). "What gray wolves' endangered status means for Minnesota". MPR News. Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  18. 1 2 Bekiempis, Victoria (March 3, 2021). "Wisconsin hunters kill 216 wolves in less than 60 hours, sparking uproar". The Guardian. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  19. ↑ Bence, Susan (November 20, 2018). "Wisconsin Gray Wolf Debate Fires Up Again". Milwaukee: WUWM. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  20. 1 2 3 Ellison, Garret (February 24, 2021). "Michigan wolves require population control, hunt supporters argue". MLive. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  21. 1 2 3 Mcnally, Bob (April 15, 2021). "Gray Wolves in Nebraska? A Genetic Test Reveals One Was Taken By a Coyote Hunter". Outdoor Life. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  22. ↑ McKee, Spencer (June 23, 2020). "The Modern History of the Wolf in Colorado". OutThere Colorado. Retrieved April 17, 2021.
  23. ↑ Spilinek, Collin (April 14, 2021). "Nebraska's third gray wolf sighting in 20 years confirmed near Uehling". Fremont Tribune. Retrieved May 6, 2021.
  24. ↑ Stapleton, Susan (February 24, 2024). "Gray wolf found dead near Davenport by the Department of Natural Resources". The Des Moines Register. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  25. ↑ "DNA Test Confirms Wolf Was Killed in Upstate New York". Outdoor Life. July 28, 2022. Retrieved July 29, 2022.
  26. ↑ "Trump Administration Returns Management and Protection of Gray Wolves to States and Tribes Following Successful Recovery Efforts". U.S. Department of the Interior. October 19, 2020. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
  27. 1 2 D’Angelo, Chris; Planas, Roque (September 21, 2021). "Wolf-killing campaigns in Idaho and Montana may have just backfired". Mother Jones. Retrieved September 22, 2021.
  28. ↑ Kaeding, Danielle (December 2, 2021). "Wisconsin's fall wolf hunt is on hold. Several lawsuits could affect whether it moves forward". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved December 7, 2021.
  29. ↑ Brown, Matthew (September 15, 2021). "US: Wolves may need protections after states expand hunting". AP News. Retrieved December 8, 2021.
  30. ↑ "Fight over U.S. wolf protections heads to federal courtroom". MPR News. Associated Press. November 12, 2021. Retrieved November 16, 2021.
  31. 1 2 Cushman, Will (August 30, 2021). "How Wisconsin's Wolf Hunt Quotas May Prompt Federal Review". PBS Wisconsin. Retrieved September 2, 2021.
  32. ↑ "Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. November 3, 2020. 85 FR 69778.
  33. ↑ "Groups fight to keep gray wolf protections for most of US". Phys.org. Associated Press. November 9, 2020. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
  34. ↑ Fishman, Elly (November 18, 2021). "Inside the Bitter Debate Over How to Manage Wolves in Wisconsin". Milwaukee Magazine. Retrieved December 8, 2021.
  35. ↑ McNally, Bob (August 7, 2021). "Great Lakes States Are Divided on Wolf Hunting Plans". Outdoor Life. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  36. ↑ Here, Karl (2020). "Anishinaabe". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  37. 1 2 3 Gilbert, Jonathan H.; David, Peter; Price, Michael W.; Oren, Jenny (2022). "Ojibwe Perspectives Toward Proper Wolf Stewardship and Wisconsin's February 2021 Wolf Hunting Season". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.782840 .
  38. ↑ Keuthan, Aliyah (June 27, 2022). "Wolf and First Man: An Anishinaabe Story of Companionship and Protection Amid the Growing Threats of Poachers and Habitat Loss". Native Land Information System.
  39. ↑ "Trump Administration Returns Management and Protection of Gray Wolves to States and Tribes Following Successful Recovery Efforts" (Press release). U.S. Department of the Interior. 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2024.
  40. ↑ Sentner, Keegan (February 10, 2023). "Minnesota Has the Most Wolves in the Lower 48 but Does Not Allow Wolf Hunting. Here's Why". Outdoor Life. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
  41. ↑ Myers, John (November 28, 2019). "Minnesota updating wolf management plan". Duluth News Tribune. Retrieved April 28, 2021.
  42. ↑ Myers, John (July 7, 2021). "DNR: No Minnesota wolf hunt this year". Duluth News Tribune. Retrieved July 8, 2021.
  43. ↑ "Minnesota releases updated draft gray wolf management plan". AP News. June 23, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2023.
  44. ↑ Myers, John (January 5, 2021). "Old Minnesota wolf rules on livestock, pet attacks back in effect". Twin Cities Pioneer Press. Forum News. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  45. ↑ "MN DNR outlines wolf plan as endangered species status expires". WDIO-TV. January 4, 2021. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  46. ↑ Weiler, Beth (November 15, 2023). "Michigan wolf population "stable" at about 630 animals". Michigan Radio. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
  47. ↑ Friend, Nick (August 4, 2021). "DNR hears debate on a potential wolf hunt". WLUC. Retrieved August 5, 2021.
  48. ↑ Llanes, Caroline (February 20, 2021). "Senate proposes resolution to start wolf hunts in 2021". Michigan Radio. Retrieved October 4, 2021.
  49. ↑ "Michigan Senate urges new wolf hunt for 2021". Upper Michigans Source. Negaunee, Michigan: WLUC-TV. March 10, 2021. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  50. 1 2 "Wisconsin says wolf season will be held next November". WDIO-TV. Associated Press. December 4, 2020. Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  51. ↑ Bence, Susan (December 1, 2020). "Conservation Group Urges Wisconsin To Develop A Sustainable Wolf Management Plan". Milwaukee: WUWM. Retrieved April 20, 2021.
  52. ↑ Keer, Tom (March 1, 2021). "'Should We Have Closed the Season Sooner? Yes.' Wisconsin DNR Faces Backlash After Wolf Hunting Season Ends in an Uproar". Field & Stream. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
  53. ↑ The Masked Biologist (January 25, 2021). "When is Wisconsin's Wolf Hunt?". WXPR. Retrieved September 6, 2021.
  54. ↑ "Republicans demand DNR resume wolf hunt immediately". AP News. January 19, 2021. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
  55. ↑ Machemer, Theresa (March 2, 2021). "Hunters Killed 82% More Wolves Than Quota Allowed in Wisconsin". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
  56. ↑ "Chippewa tribes blast Wisconsin wolf hunt, say it was about killing". MPR News. Minnesota Public Radio. The Associated Press. March 22, 2021. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  57. ↑ Holmes, Isiah (February 23, 2021). "Wisconsin wolf hunt called "unenforceable"". Wisconsin Examiner. Retrieved September 6, 2021.
  58. 1 2 Asmelash, Leah (October 5, 2021). "Wisconsin's wolf hunt quota is lowered following months of conflict". CNN. Retrieved October 6, 2021.
  59. 1 2 3 Richmond, Todd (August 12, 2021). "What's Ahead for the Wisconsin Wolf Hunt". U.S. News & World Report. The Associated Press.
  60. ↑ Thoresen, Katie (August 19, 2021). "Wisconsin Wolf Management Differs from Neighboring Michigan & Minnesota". WXPR. Retrieved December 22, 2021.
  61. ↑ Stanley, Greg (February 25, 2021). "As Minnesota considers wolf hunt, Wisconsin hunters blow past quotas". Star Tribune. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  62. 1 2 Hubbuch, Chris (February 26, 2021). "Wolf kill total continues to rise well over quota in Wisconsin's first hunt after federal protections". Madison.com. Retrieved October 6, 2021.
  63. ↑ Kaeding, Danielle (October 22, 2021). "Dane County judge temporarily bars Wisconsin's wolf hunt, orders DNR to set quota of zero wolves". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved November 2, 2021.
  64. 1 2 Treves, Adrian; Santiago-Ávila, Francisco J.; Putrevu, Karann (July 5, 2021). "Quantifying the effects of delisting wolves after the first state began lethal management". PeerJ. 9: e11666. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11666 . ISSN   2167-8359. PMC   8265384 . PMID   34268009.
  65. 1 2 Cosier, Susan (August 12, 2021). "Scientists urged Wisconsin to limit its wolf kill. It didn't go well". Science. Retrieved September 12, 2021.
  66. 1 2 3 Joosse, Tess (September 7, 2021). "Wolf Populations Drop as More States Allow Hunting". Scientific American. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
  67. ↑ Roy, Adam (September 9, 2021). "Wisconsin Officials Want to Double Their Wolf Hunt. Conservationists Are Suing to Shut it Down". Backpacker. Retrieved September 11, 2021.
  68. ↑ Smith, Paul A. (October 1, 2021). "A hearing is set for the Ojibwe tribes' wolf hunting case as they also seek an injunction to stop the DNR from issuing licenses". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved October 2, 2021.
  69. ↑ Kaeding, Danielle (October 29, 2021). "Wisconsin tribes seek federal injunction to block fall wolf hunt even as recent order bars a season". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved October 30, 2021.
  70. ↑ "Wolf hunting and trapping". Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  71. ↑ Smith, Paul A. (September 18, 2021). "Ojibwe tribes have claimed 50% of wolf quota and are pushing for a reduction in the overall number". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved September 19, 2021.
  72. ↑ Poltrock, Heather (October 4, 2021). "DNR sets wolf hunt quota at 130; non-tribal hunters to be allotted 74 wolves". WEAU. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  73. ↑ Hurteau, Dave (December 21, 2021). "Court Backlog Ends Any Hope of Wisconsin Wolf Hunt This Winter". Field & Stream. Retrieved December 22, 2021.
  74. ↑ Richmond, Todd (October 22, 2021). "Judge issues injunction blocking Wisconsin fall wolf hunt". AP News. Retrieved October 23, 2021.
  75. ↑ Mentzer, Rob (October 29, 2021). "Federal judge declines to issue new injunction on Wisconsin wolf hunt". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved October 31, 2021.
  76. ↑ Mayhem, Alanna (November 2, 2023). "Gray wolves officially protected once again". Courthouse News Service.
  77. ↑ Langrehr, Jaymes (February 11, 2022). "DNR says Wisconsin will no longer have wolf-hunting season due to endangered species ruling". Channel3000. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  78. ↑ Smith, Paul A. (December 1, 2022). "DNR social science work finds majority support for wolves in Wisconsin". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved December 7, 2022.
  79. ↑ Richmond, Todd (November 10, 2022). "New Wisconsin wolf plan eliminates state population goal". AP News. Retrieved December 7, 2022.
  80. ↑ "Legislators press DNR policy board appointees on wolves, pollution, sandhill crane hunt". WMTV. Associated Press. August 23, 2023. Retrieved August 25, 2023.
  81. ↑ Kaeding, Danielle (October 25, 2023). "Natural Resources Board approves DNR's wolf management plan". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
  82. ↑ Bauer, Scott (May 6, 2024). "Wisconsin judge dismisses lawsuit challenging state's new wolf management plan". AP News. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
  83. ↑ Beleckis, Jonah (November 14, 2023). "Wisconsin's goals for managing wolves? DNR wolf specialist breaks down new plan". Wisconsin Public Radio. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
  84. ↑ Larson, Christina (May 24, 2021). "Wolves scare deer and reduce auto collisions 24%, study says". AP News. Retrieved May 25, 2021.
  85. ↑ Raynor, Jennifer L.; Grainger, Corbett A.; Parker, Dominic P. (June 1, 2021). "Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (22): e2023251118. Bibcode:2021PNAS..11823251R. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023251118 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   8179214 . PMID   34031245. S2CID   235199640.
  86. ↑ Kraker, Dan (November 26, 2023). "Research reveals more secrets of where wolves hunt in northern Minnesota and their impact on forests". MPR News. Retrieved November 27, 2023.

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.