![]() | |
Event type | Supernova |
---|---|
Type Ic | |
Date | 26 April 1998 |
Constellation | Telescopium |
Right ascension | 19h 35m 03.17s [1] |
Declination | −52° 50′ 46.1″ [1] |
Galactic coordinates | 344.99°, −27.72° [2] |
Redshift | 0.0085 ![]() |
Host | ESO 184-G82 |
SN 1998bw was a rare broad-lined Type Ic [3] gamma ray burst supernova detected on 26 April 1998 in the ESO 184-G82 spiral galaxy, which some astronomers believe may be an example of a collapsar (hypernova). [4] The hypernova has been linked to GRB 980425 , which was detected on 25 April 1998, the first time a gamma-ray burst has been linked to a supernova. [5] The hypernova is approximately 140 million light years away, very close for a gamma ray burst source. [6]
The region of the galaxy where the supernova occurred hosts stars 5-8 million years old and is relatively free from dust. A nearby region hosts multiple Wolf-Rayet stars less than 3 million years old, but it is unlikely that the supernova progenitor could be a runaway from that region. The implication is that the progenitor was a star originally 25-40 M☉ if it exploded as a single star at the end of its life. [7]
On 25 April 1998, a gamma ray burst was detected by the BeppoSAX satellite and assigned the identifier GRB 980425. The event lasted for 30 seconds, [8] and was about average in terms of burst flux. [9] A check of images from the ESO New Technology Telescope showed a rapidly brightening point source within the error box of GRB 980425. It was located in the face-on spiral galaxy ESO 184-G82, in a spiral arm at an offset from the nucleus. This candidate supernova event lacked spectral lines of hydrogen, ruling out a normal core-collapse Type II supernova, and it was a missing line of silicon that indicated it is not a typical Type Ia supernova. [10]
A few weeks after full light, the spectrum of supernova SN 1998bw showed no clear indications of helium. This suggested the event be classed as a Type Ic supernova, although it showed some peculiarities compared to other supernovae of this type. The expansion velocity measured from calcium lines was measured as 11,700 km/s, and 9,100 km/s from silicon lines. [11] The maximum recorded expansion velocities reached 3×104 km/s. [12] Energy emissions from the supernova showed polarization, which supported a core-collapse scenario with asymmetry. [13]
Radio measurements of the supernova showed that is was unusually luminous in this band. The data suggested a shock wave moving at a relativistic velocity, whereas most supernovae ejecta are non-relativistic. [14] This was the first evidence found for a relativistic shock from a supernova. [15] The supernova light curves from radio to X-ray bands also indicated a blast wave that was highly relativistic. The data was consistent with a physical association between SN 1998bw and GRB 980425, [16] [17] and supported the idea of a hypernova or collapsar event. This scenario results in the formation of a black hole from the collapse of a massive star. [16] [18] Spherically-symmetrical models failed to reproduce an event with this energy level, indicating a highly asymmetrical explosion that produced the gamma-ray burst from a relativistic jet. [19] In this case, only a fraction of the progenitor's stellar mass was ejected, with the remainder collapsing to form a black hole. [3]
The supernova transitioned to the nebular phase around 100 days after the explosion. [20] Expansion velocities remained very high compared to other core-collapse supernovae at similar phases. [12] The unusual spectrum observed during the nebular phase matched a model for a strongly aspherical explosion observed from near the direction of a relativistic jet. [21] [22] The radio emission from the supernova can best be explained by interaction between the relativistic shock and clumpy circumstellar medium previously ejected by a strong stellar wind. [23] Observations from the Chandra X-ray Observatory in 2004 found X-ray emission that supported this scenario. [24] It also lent support to the idea that the supernova and gamma-ray burst were the same event. [25]
Observations with the Hubble Space Telescope indicated that the host for the supernova event is a sub-luminous galaxy with a morphological classification of SBc. This indicates ESO 184-G82 is a barred spiral galaxy with loosely-wound spiral arms. The galaxy is undergoing strong star formation and the supernova occurred in an active star forming area that includes an H II region. This environment is fairly typical for Type II supernovae. The supernova afterglow was about a magnitude brighter than expected from a radioactive decay model, suggesting a contribution from a surrounding stellar cluster. [26]
The host galaxy appears morphologically disturbed, which suggests interaction from nearby galaxies. This could explain the amplified star forming process. [26] Six galaxies lie within the field of ESO 184-G82 but none of them have a matching redshift of 0.0087±0.0006. Thus, it appears to be an isolated dwarf galaxy and another explanation is needed for the star formation. [27] A 2020 study with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array discovered the galaxy has a ring of dense neutral hydrogen, which includes clumps of gas. One of these clumps was the host of SN 1998bw. The presence of a ring indicates a past collision with a companion galaxy. [28]