Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years

Last updated

Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years
Author E. F. Bleiler, with the assistance of Richard Bleiler
Genre Reference work
Publisher Kent State University Press
Publication date
1998
Pagesxxx + 730
ISBN 978-0-87338-604-3
Preceded by Science-Fiction: The Early Years (1990) 

Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years is a 1998 reference work covering the history of English-language science fiction magazines from 1926 to 1936, comprising 1,835 individual stories by more than 500 different authors across a total of 345 issues from 14 magazines. It was written by E. F. Bleiler with the assistance of his son Richard Bleiler, a follow-up to their previous Science-Fiction: The Early Years (1990).

Contents

The book received positive reviews, with critics commending its comprehensiveness and level of detail. Reviewers found it to live up to the standards set by its predecessor. Several critics described it as indispensable; science fiction scholars James E. Gunn and Gary Westfahl both commented that their own previous research would have been greatly aided by the book, had it been available to them.

Creation

Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years was conceived of as a follow-up to E. F. Bleiler's previous bibliographical reference works, The Guide to Supernatural Fiction (1983) and Science-Fiction: The Early Years (1990). [1] The title refers to science fiction editor Hugo Gernsback, who created the first science fiction magazine— Amazing Stories —in 1926, coined the term "scientifiction", and for whom the science fiction literature Hugo Award is named. [1] [2] [3] E. F. Bleiler researched and summarized the primary literature, while his son Richard Bleiler tracked down biographical and bibliographical details. [3]

Contents

The book begins with a preface and introduction by Bleiler providing background information. This includes an outline of the approach taken and an overview of the magazines, [1] [4] as well as two tables tracking the use of various motifs and story formulas across the time period. [5] Bleiler writes that satire had by this time largely fallen out of favour, and that politically contentious topics such as Prohibition and lynching in the United States and international conflicts such as the Chinese Civil War and Italian invasion of Ethiopia were mostly avoided by science fiction authors. In Bleiler's view, conservatism and traditional gender roles characterized the science fiction of the time, and much of it reflected xenophobic and colonialist attitudes.

The main portion of the book consists of a complete catalogue of all stories published in English-language science fiction magazines between 1926 (when Gernsback founded Amazing) and 1936 (the year Gernsback sold Wonder Stories ). [3] [4] The magazines in question include the major publications Amazing, Wonder, and Astounding Stories , as well as their spinoffs such as Amazing Stories Annual and Amazing Stories Quarterly , and minor publications like Flash Gordon Strange Adventure Magazine and Miracle Science and Fantasy Stories . [3] A total of 345 issues [6] from 14 different magazines are covered, of which all but the British publication Scoops are from the United States. [7] The stories are arranged alphabetically by author and then chronologically for each author. [3] [5] Each story receives a summary of its plot spanning a few hundred words, [8] about 200 on average, [5] and additionally a single-sentence critical evaluation by Bleiler. [1] The total number of stories thus covered is 1,835 [4] [9] across 522 pages. [1] Each author also gets a brief biographical description, where such information is known. [5] The total number of authors represented exceeds 500. [7]

The remainder of the book consists of multiple appendices and indices, [3] as well as a bibliography of secondary literature. [4] One of the appendices, entitled "Magazine Histories and Contents", spans 57 pages and covers various information about the magazines including an overview of each magazine's history, the complete contents of each individual issue (both the fiction itself and nonfiction content such as editorials, reviews, and letters), pricing, pagination, and the people involved—publishers, editors, authors, and artists alike. [1] [4] [5] [6] The other appendices include a list of anthologies in which the stories have been reprinted, [1] [6] a list of science fiction poetry, [4] a list of stories that were originally published outside of the magazines but reprinted in them, [6] and a section on magazine artists including black-and-white reproductions of a selection of 13 covers. [1] [5] [6] There are three indices: one for motifs and themes, containing entries like "High civilizations of the past, non-human" and "Mad scientist, motivations, purposes"; [8] one for titles; and one for authors. [1] [4]

Reception

James E. Gunn reviewed the book for Utopian Studies in 1999, writing of it and its two predecessors that "Bleiler's work is so sound and so thorough that every college library ought to have copies, and enterprising scholars may well wish to have the series as close to hand as The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction ". He particularly appreciated the "Magazine Histories and Contents" appendix, writing that "Data such as this is invaluable to the scholar and researcher, and I wish I had had the books when I was working on Alternate Worlds and The Road to Science Fiction ". Gunn nevertheless identified several negatives. He found the font and three-column layout of the magazine section unnecessarily difficult to read. He also stated that he would have preferred Bleiler to have elaborated on the reasons for his more critical assessments. Gunn further identified some factual errors and criticized a habit of speculating without presenting evidence. Finally, Gunn found the selection of secondary literature in the bibliography lacking, writing that "Bleiler's focus on the literature itself is salutory, but his acquaintance with secondary materials seems hit-and-miss". [1]

Thomas Easton, in a review originally published in the June 1999 issue of Analog Science Fiction and Fact (later republished in Easton's 2006 collection Off the Main Sequence), called the book "an invaluable reference". Besides the main contents of the book, Easton found the description of the science fiction magazine readership in the book's introduction particularly interesting—noting that while Bleiler describes the general readership in a fairly unflattering manner, he also lists a large number of people among the most devoted fans who would go on to be significant personages within the fields of science and literature (according to Easton, "the proportion is such as to leave a Harvard in the dust"). [10]

David Pringle, reviewing the book for Science Fiction Studies in July 2000, compared it favourably to its predecessor Science-Fiction: The Early Years —commenting that while it is somewhat shorter in length, it is in turn entirely comprehensive within its scope, and concluding that it is an equally indispensable resource for science fiction scholars. In Pringle's view, Bleiler's reading of the primary material "in a sense, has relieved the rest of us from the necessity of ever having to do likewise", writing that the low availability of many of the magazines and the lack of reprinting of the majority of the stories (in anthologies or otherwise) means that "it is for the detailed second-hand knowledge of these that it provides that Bleiler's book will be particularly valuable". Pringle also commended the detailed knowledge on display, writing that the small number of errors he noted did not detract from the overall impression. [3]

Gary Westfahl, in a 2000 review for Extrapolation , described it as "an indispensable, even wondrous reference book: meticulously researched, thorough in its coverage, usefully organized, and fascinating to read in its entirety". On the usefulness of the volume for scholars, Westfahl described the contents as "information that I would have died for ten or twenty years ago and information that will vastly improve any future research into this era of science fiction history", while at the same time cautioning against using the tome as a substitute for reading the primary literature itself when conducting research. [4]

Michael Schoenecke, reviewing the book for the Journal of American and Comparative Cultures in 2000, praised the work's comprehensiveness within its scope. Schoenecke described the book as "a rich harvest, fascinating and informative". [11]

In the 2002 edition of Reference Guide to Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror by Michael Burgess and Lisa R. Bartle, the book is described as "both authoritative and well-written", with its level of detail receiving specific praise. The ease of navigation is also highlighted as a positive. [5]

Robert Silverberg described the book in Asimov's Science Fiction in May 2003 as "a monumental work of a grandeur and magnificence verging on lunacy [...] a meticulous work of scholarship with an almost medieval intensity about it, the equivalent of what teams of monks might have spent decades producing in the thirteenth century". Silverberg praised in particular the devotion to reading all the included stories and providing critical commentary, expressing amusement at Bleiler's at times blunt dismissals of literary merit. He nevertheless found himself inspired by the book to revisit some of the more obscure works discussed and suggested readers look into two anthologies of works from this era to get an appreciation for the level of quality some of them reached: Isaac Asimov's Before the Golden Age (1974) and Damon Knight's Science Fiction of the Thirties (1976). [8]

Neil Barron, in the 2004 edition of his Anatomy of Wonder: A Critical Guide to Science Fiction, called the book "[a]n essential companion to the author's equally authoritative Science-Fiction: The Early Years". [7] Gary K. Wolfe, writing in the same volume, similarly described it as "one of the major indispensable works of SF scholarship". [6]

John Clute, writing in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, commented that Bleiler's suite of reference works culminating in The Gernsback Years "stands as a central resource for the study of sf books" alongside the works of authors such as Barron and Donald H. Tuck (author of The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy ). Clute also wrote that all three works are characterized both by extraordinary scope and extraordinary thoroughness. [12]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugo Gernsback</span> American inventor, writer, editor and publisher (1884–1967)

Hugo Gernsback was a Luxembourgish–American editor and magazine publisher, whose publications included the first science fiction magazine, Amazing Stories. His contributions to the genre as publisher were so significant that, along with the novelists H. G. Wells and Jules Verne, he is sometimes called "The Father of Science Fiction". In his honor, annual awards presented at the World Science Fiction Convention are named the "Hugos".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hard science fiction</span> Science fiction with concern for scientific accuracy

Hard science fiction is a category of science fiction characterized by concern for scientific accuracy and logic. The term was first used in print in 1957 by P. Schuyler Miller in a review of John W. Campbell's Islands of Space in the November issue of Astounding Science Fiction. The complementary term soft science fiction, formed by analogy to hard science fiction, first appeared in the late 1970s. The term is formed by analogy to the popular distinction between the "hard" (natural) and "soft" (social) sciences, although there are examples generally considered as "hard" science fiction such as Isaac Asimov's Foundation series, built on mathematical sociology. Science fiction critic Gary Westfahl argues that neither term is part of a rigorous taxonomy; instead they are approximate ways of characterizing stories that reviewers and commentators have found useful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T. O'Conor Sloane</span> American scientist

Thomas O'Conor Sloane was an American scientist, inventor, author, editor, educator, and linguist, perhaps best known for writing The Standard Electrical Dictionary and as the editor of Scientific American, from 1886 to 1896 and the first science fiction magazine, Amazing Stories, from 1929 to 1938.

<i>Ralph 124C 41+</i> 1911 novel by Hugo Gernsback

Ralph 124C 41 +, by Hugo Gernsback, is an early science fiction novel, written as a twelve-part serial in Modern Electrics magazine, which Gernsback edited, beginning in April 1911. It was compiled into novel/book form in 1925. While it pioneered many ideas found in later science fiction, it has been critically panned for its "inept writing". The title contains a play on words, meaning "One to foresee for one another". In the introduction to the first volume of Science-Fiction Plus, dated March 1953, Gernsback called for patent reform to give science fiction authors the right to create patents for ideas without having patent models because many of their ideas predated the technical progress needed to develop specifications for their ideas. The introduction referenced the numerous prescient technologies described throughout Ralph 124C 41+.

<i>Wonder Stories</i> American science fiction magazine

Wonder Stories was an early American science fiction magazine which was published under several titles from 1929 to 1955. It was founded by Hugo Gernsback in 1929 after he had lost control of his first science fiction magazine, Amazing Stories, when his media company Experimenter Publishing went bankrupt. Within a few months of the bankruptcy, Gernsback launched three new magazines: Air Wonder Stories, Science Wonder Stories, and Science Wonder Quarterly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David H. Keller</span> American writer (1880–1966)

David Henry Keller was an American writer who worked for pulp magazines in the mid-twentieth century, in the science fiction, fantasy, and horror genres. He was also a psychiatrist and physician to shell-shocked soldiers during World War I and World War II, and his experience treating mentally ill people is evident in some of his writing, which contains references to mental disorders. He initially wrote short stories as a hobby and published his first science fiction story in Amazing Stories in 1928. He continued to work as a psychiatrist while publishing over sixty short stories in science fiction and horror genres. Technically, his stories were not well-written, but focused on the emotional aspects of imaginative situations, which was unusual for stories at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jupiter in fiction</span> Depictions of the planet

Jupiter, the largest planet in the Solar System, has appeared in works of fiction across several centuries. The way the planet has been depicted has evolved as more has become known about its composition; it was initially portrayed as being entirely solid, later as having a high-pressure atmosphere with a solid surface underneath, and finally as being entirely gaseous. It was a popular setting during the pulp era of science fiction. Life on the planet has variously been depicted as identical to humans, larger versions of humans, and non-human. Non-human life on Jupiter has been portrayed as primitive in some works and more advanced than humans in others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Saturn in fiction</span> Depictions of the planet

Saturn has made appearances in fiction since the 1752 novel Micromégas by Voltaire. In the earliest depictions, it was portrayed as having a solid surface rather than its actual gaseous composition. In many of these works, the planet is inhabited by aliens that are usually portrayed as being more advanced than humans. In modern science fiction, the Saturnian atmosphere sometimes hosts floating settlements. The planet is occasionally visited by humans and its rings are sometimes mined for resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pluto in fiction</span> Depictions of the dwarf planet

Pluto has appeared in fiction as a setting since shortly after its 1930 discovery, albeit infrequently. It was initially comparatively popular as it was newly discovered and thought to be the outermost object of the Solar System and made more fictional appearances than either Uranus or Neptune, though still far fewer than other planets. Alien life, sometimes intelligent life and occasionally an entire ecosphere, is a common motif in fictional depictions of Pluto. Human settlement appears only sporadically, but it is often either the starting or finishing point for a tour of the Solar System. It has variously been depicted as an originally extrasolar planet, the remnants of a destroyed planet, or entirely artificial. Its moon Charon has also appeared in a handful of works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neptune in fiction</span> Depictions of the planet

Neptune has appeared in fiction since shortly after its 1846 discovery, albeit infrequently. It initially made appearances indirectly—e.g. through its inhabitants—rather than as a setting. The earliest stories set on Neptune itself portrayed it as a rocky planet rather than as having its actual gaseous composition; later works rectified this error. Extraterrestrial life on Neptune is uncommon in fiction, though the exceptions have ranged from humanoids to gaseous lifeforms. Neptune's largest moon Triton has also appeared in fiction, especially in the late 20th century onwards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uranus in fiction</span> Depictions of the planet

Uranus has been used as a setting in works of fiction since shortly after its 1781 discovery, albeit infrequently. The earliest depictions portrayed it as having a solid surface, whereas later stories portrayed it more accurately as a gaseous planet. Its moons have also appeared in a handful of works. Both the planet and its moons have experienced a slight trend of increased representation in fiction over time.

Richard Neil Barron was a science fiction bibliographer and scholar. His training was as a librarian. He is perhaps best known for his book Anatomy of Wonder: A Critical Guide to Science Fiction. He won the Pilgrim Award for Lifetime Achievement in the field of science fiction scholarship in 1982. He died on September 5, 2010, in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Science fiction studies is the common name for the academic discipline that studies and researches the history, culture, and works of science fiction and, more broadly, speculative fiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immortality in fiction</span> Immortality applied as an element in works of fiction

Immortality is a common theme in fiction. The concept has been depicted since the Epic of Gilgamesh, the oldest known work of fiction. Originally appearing in the domain of mythology, it has later become a recurring element in the genres of horror, science fiction, and fantasy. For most of literary history, the dominant perspective has been that the desire for immortality is misguided, albeit strong; among the posited drawbacks are ennui, loneliness, and social stagnation. This view was challenged in the 20th century by writers such as George Bernard Shaw and Roger Zelazny. Immortality is commonly obtained either from supernatural entities or objects such as the Fountain of Youth or through biological or technological means such as brain transplants.

<i>Amazing Stories Annual</i> Science fiction magazine

Amazing Stories Annual was a pulp magazine which published a single issue in July 1927. It was edited by Hugo Gernsback, and featured the first publication of The Master Mind of Mars, by Edgar Rice Burroughs, which had been rejected by several other magazines, perhaps because the plot included a satire on religious fundamentalism. The other stories in Amazing Stories Annual were reprints, including two stories by A. Merritt, and one by H.G. Wells. The magazine sold out, and its success led Gernsback to launch Amazing Stories Quarterly the following year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otfrid von Hanstein</span>

Otfrid von Hanstein (1869–1959) was a German actor and writer. As a novelist, he was prolific in various genres; his best-known works in English-language translation are science fiction novels published in various magazines by Hugo Gernsback. John Clute describes von Hanstein's science fiction as "technophilic and space-oriented, crude but competent". E. F. Bleiler reports that his SF novels were suppressed by the Nazi government.

<i>Scientific Detective Monthly</i> US pulp science fiction magazine

Scientific Detective Monthly was a pulp magazine that published fifteen issues beginning in January 1930. It was launched by Hugo Gernsback as part of his second venture into science-fiction magazine publishing, and was intended to focus on detective and mystery stories with a scientific element. Many of the stories involved contemporary science without any imaginative elements—for example, a story in the first issue turned on the use of a bolometer to detect a black girl blushing—but there were also one or two science fiction stories in every issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of US science fiction and fantasy magazines to 1950</span> Science-fiction and fantasy magazine history

Science-fiction and fantasy magazines began to be published in the United States in the 1920s. Stories with science-fiction themes had been appearing for decades in pulp magazines such as Argosy, but there were no magazines that specialized in a single genre until 1915, when Street & Smith, one of the major pulp publishers, brought out Detective Story Magazine. The first magazine to focus solely on fantasy and horror was Weird Tales, which was launched in 1923, and established itself as the leading weird fiction magazine over the next two decades; writers such as H.P. Lovecraft, Clark Ashton Smith and Robert E. Howard became regular contributors. In 1926 Weird Tales was joined by Amazing Stories, published by Hugo Gernsback; Amazing printed only science fiction, and no fantasy. Gernsback included a letter column in Amazing Stories, and this led to the creation of organized science-fiction fandom, as fans contacted each other using the addresses published with the letters. Gernsback wanted the fiction he printed to be scientifically accurate, and educational, as well as entertaining, but found it difficult to obtain stories that met his goals; he printed "The Moon Pool" by Abraham Merritt in 1927, despite it being completely unscientific. Gernsback lost control of Amazing Stories in 1929, but quickly started several new magazines. Wonder Stories, one of Gernsback's titles, was edited by David Lasser, who worked to improve the quality of the fiction he received. Another early competitor was Astounding Stories of Super-Science, which appeared in 1930, edited by Harry Bates, but Bates printed only the most basic adventure stories with minimal scientific content, and little of the material from his era is now remembered.

<i>Amazing Stories Quarterly</i> U.S. science fiction pulp magazine

Amazing Stories Quarterly was a U.S. science fiction pulp magazine that was published between 1928 and 1934. It was launched by Hugo Gernsback as a companion to his Amazing Stories, the first science fiction magazine, which had begun publishing in April 1926. Amazing Stories had been successful enough for Gernsback to try a single issue of an Amazing Stories Annual in 1927, which had sold well, and he decided to follow it up with a quarterly magazine. The first issue of Amazing Stories Quarterly was dated Winter 1928 and carried a reprint of the 1899 version of H.G. Wells' When the Sleeper Wakes. Gernsback's policy of running a novel in each issue was popular with his readership, though the choice of Wells' novel was less so. Over the next five issues, only one more reprint appeared: Gernsback's own novel Ralph 124C 41+, in the Winter 1929 issue. Gernsback went bankrupt in early 1929, and lost control of both Amazing Stories and Amazing Stories Quarterly; associate editor T. O'Conor Sloane then took over as editor. The magazine began to run into financial difficulties in 1932, and the schedule became irregular; the last issue was dated Fall 1934.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sun in fiction</span>

The Sun has appeared as a setting in fiction since at least classical antiquity, but for a long time it received relatively sporadic attention. Many of the early depictions viewed it as an essentially Earth-like and thus potentially habitable body—a once-common belief about celestial objects in general known as the plurality of worlds—and depicted various kinds of solar inhabitants. Once more became known about the Sun through advances in astronomy, in particular its temperature, solar inhabitants fell out of favour save for the occasional more exotic alien lifeforms. Instead, many stories focused on the eventual death of the Sun and the havoc it would wreak upon life on Earth. Before it was understood that the Sun is powered by nuclear fusion, the prevailing assumption among writers was that combustion was the source of its heat and light, and it was expected to run out of fuel relatively soon. Even after the true source of the Sun's energy was discovered in the 1920s, the dimming or extinction of the Sun remained a recurring theme in disaster stories, with occasional attempts at averting disaster by reigniting the Sun. Another common way for the Sun to cause destruction is by exploding, and other mechanisms such as solar flares also appear on occasion.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gunn, James (1999). "Review of Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years". Utopian Studies . 10 (1): 157–159. ISSN   1045-991X. JSTOR   20718020.
  2. ↑ Quinn, Mary Ellen (2003-04-15). "Amazing stories. (News & views)". Booklist . 99 (16): 1487–1488.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pringle, David (July 2000). "A Monumental Achievement". Science Fiction Studies . 27 (2): 310–312. ISSN   0091-7729. JSTOR   4240884.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Westfahl, Gary (Summer 2000). "Review: Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years". Extrapolation . 41 (2): 197–201. doi:10.3828/extr.2000.41.2.197. ISSN   0014-5483.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Burgess, Michael; Bartle, Lisa R. (2002). "Magazine and Anthology Indexes". Reference Guide to Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror. Reference Sources in the Humanities (Second ed.). Libraries Unlimited. pp. 125–126. ISBN   978-1-56308-548-2.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wolfe, Gary K. (2004). "History and Criticism". In Barron, Neil (ed.). Anatomy of Wonder: A Critical Guide to Science Fiction (5th ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited. p. 539. ISBN   978-1-59158-171-0.
  7. 1 2 3 Barron, Neil (2004). "General Reference Works". In Barron, Neil (ed.). Anatomy of Wonder: A Critical Guide to Science Fiction (5th ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited. pp. 503–504. ISBN   978-1-59158-171-0.
  8. 1 2 3 Silverberg, Robert (May 2003). Dozois, Gardner (ed.). "Reflections: Ancestral Voices". Asimov's Science Fiction . Vol. 27, no. 5. pp. 5–8. ISSN   1065-2698.
  9. ↑ Bleiler, Richard (1999-05-15). "Science Fiction: The Gernsback Years: A Complete Coverage of the Genre Magazines Amazing, Astounding, Wonder, and Others from 1926 through 1936". Booklist . 95 (18): 1722.
  10. ↑
  11. ↑ Schoenecke, Michael (Summer 2000). "Review: Science-Fiction: The Gernsback Years". Journal of American and Comparative Cultures . 23 (2): 99. ISSN   1537-4726 – via ProQuest.
  12. ↑ Clute, John (2022). "Bleiler, Everett F". In Clute, John; Langford, David; Sleight, Graham (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (4th ed.). Retrieved 2023-06-05.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.