Second (parliamentary procedure)

Last updated

In deliberative bodies, a second to a proposed motion is an indication that there is at least one person besides the mover that is interested in seeing the motion come before the meeting. It does not necessarily indicate that the seconder favors the motion.

Contents

Purpose

The purpose of requiring a second is to prevent time being wasted by the assembly's having to dispose of a motion that only one person wants to see introduced. [1] Hearing a second to a motion is guidance to the chair that they should state the question on the motion, thereby placing it before the assembly. [2] It does not necessarily indicate that the seconder favors the motion. [2]

Procedure

The seconder may state "I second the motion" or "second" without first being recognized by the chair. They may remain seated but in larger assemblies, except in those where nonmembers may be seated in the hall, the seconder should stand. [1] After hearing a second, the chair then states the question and the motion is placed before the assembly for discussion.

When no second is made

After a motion is proposed, if the motion requires a second and none is immediately offered, the chair of the body will usually ask, "Is there a second?" [1] If no second is obtained within a few moments of proposing the motion, then the motion is not considered by the assembly, and is treated as though it was never offered. [3] Such a motion may be introduced again at any later time. [4]

If a motion which requires a second does not receive one, but is discussed or voted on anyway, it is too late to object to the motion on the grounds that a second was not offered. This is because the purpose of the second has been fulfilled: the assembly is obviously willing to consider the motion. [5]

A point of order that a motion is not in order for lack of a second can only be made before any discussion or vote has taken place on the motion. [5]

When a second is not necessary

Withdrawal of a second

A second may be withdrawn if the motion is amended by the maker of the motion before it has been stated by the chair. [6] Demeter's Manual states, "The seconder can also withdraw his second after the Chair has stated the question and before it is voted on, if the body permits it either by silent consent, or by majority vote if put to a formal vote." [7]

Parliamentary authorities that discourage seconds

Legislative bodies

United States

While Jefferson's Manual, which is an authority still used in the US House of Representatives, requires a Second, the House has, by precedent and Standing orders, entirely dispensed with the use of Seconds.

Australia

Federal Parliament

Seconds are still required in the Australian House of Representatives for motions moved by private members. On the basis that a Minister is assumed to have the backing of the Government, Motions moved by a Minister and, in certain circumstances, the Chief Government Whip, do not require a seconder. Seconds are called for in some special cases, even when moved by a minister, for example condolence motions, when traditionally the Leader of the Opposition will second the motion. [11] Seconds are not used in the Australian Senate however. [12]

State Parliaments

Seconds are not required in either house of the Parliament of New South Wales nor in the unicameral Legislative Assembly of the Australian Capital Territory. [13] [14] [15]

In the unicameral parliament of Queensland a seconder is not required in most cases. A seconder is required for any motion or amendment to an Address to the Governor, election of the Speaker or condolence. [16]

Local Government

In contrast to the practice in the State Parliament, the Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Government in New South Wales requires that motions be seconded. [17]

In Queensland the Best Practice Standing Orders for Local Government requires a second for all motions. [18] However, in contrast to NSW, these Standing Orders are not binding on Councils, which may modify them. [19]

Common Law

An early document attesting to the need for a second is Scobell's Memorials etc, which was referenced by Jefferson in his Manual. [20] [21] However the importance of a Second is not clear in Scobell's work, and in any event it has been progressively overturned by legislatures since the 19th Century.

It has been held judicially that the Common Law does not demand a Second, except when the "custom and practice" of the organisation requires it. [22] Although a contrary opinion has also been stated. [23]

Notes and references

  1. 1 2 3 4 Robert, Henry M.; et al. (2011). Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press. p. 35. ISBN   978-0-306-82020-5.
  2. 1 2 3 Robert 2011 , p. 36
  3. Robert 2011 , p. 469
  4. Robert 2011 , p. 337
  5. 1 2 3 Robert 2011 , p. 37
  6. Robert 2011 , p. 40
  7. Demeter, George (1969). Demeter's Manual of Parliamentary Law and Procedure, Blue Book, p. 146
  8. Keesey, Ray E. (1974). Modern Parliamentary Procedure. Houghton Mifflin. p. 31. ISBN   0-395-19397-4.
  9. Tilson, John Q. (1948). Tilson's Manual. p. 95.
  10. National Conference of State Legislatures (2000). Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure
  11. Elder, D.R. (David); Fowler, P.E., eds. (14 August 2018). House of Representatives Practice (PDF) (7th ed.). Department of the House of Representatives. p. 300-301. ISBN   978-1-74366-654-8.
  12. Odgers, J.R. (James Rowland) (2016). Laing, Rosemary (ed.). Odgers' Australian Senate practice: As revised by Harry Evans (PDF) (14th ed.). Department of the Senate. ISBN   978-1-76010-503-7.
  13. Legislative Assembly Standing Orders (PDF). Sydney: Legislative Assembly of New South Wales. 20 February 2023.
  14. "Standing Order 79". Legislative Council Standing Rules and Orders (PDF). Sydney: Legislative Council of New South Wales. 20 February 2023. p. 30. Motions, other than the motion for the address-in-reply, do not require a seconder.
  15. Skinner, David; Duncan, Tom, eds. (2022). "10. Motions". Companion to the Standing Orders of the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory (PDF) (2nd ed.). Canberra, ACT: Office of the Legislative Assembly. p. 292. ISBN   978-1-76010-503-7. 10.38... (there is no provision for motions to be seconded in the Assembly)...
  16. https://documents.parliament.qld.gov.au/assembly/procedures/StandingRules&Orders.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  17. https://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Model-Code-Meeting-Practice-2021.pdf "10.1 Unless otherwise specified in this code, a motion or an amendment cannot be debated unless or until it has been seconded."
  18. https://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/44072/best-practice-standing-orders.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  19. https://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/44302/model-meeting-procedures.pdf page 5
  20. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/H.S.E.C.P._%28Henry_Scobell%29%2C_Memorials_of_the_Method_and_Manner_of_Proceedings_in_Parliament_in_Passing_Bills_%283rd_ed%2C_1670%29.pdf (21)
  21. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/HMAN-116/pdf/HMAN-116.pdf Jefferson's Manual Section XX
  22. Re Horbury Bridge Coal Iron and Waggon Co (1879) 11 Ch D 109 at 118.
  23. Re Adams International Food Traders Pty Ltd (1988) 13 NSWLR 282 at 284.

Related Research Articles

<i>Roberts Rules of Order</i> Book on parliamentary procedure by Henry Martyn Robert

Robert's Rules of Order, often simply referred to as Robert's Rules, is a manual of parliamentary procedure by U.S. Army officer Henry Martyn Robert. "The object of Rules of Order is to assist an assembly to accomplish the work for which it was designed [...] Where there is no law [...] there is the least of real liberty." The term Robert's Rules of Order is also used more generically to refer to any of the more recent editions, by various editors and authors, based on any of Robert's original editions, and the term is used more generically in the United States to refer to parliamentary procedure. It was written primarily to help guide voluntary associations in their operations of governance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloture</span> Parliamentary procedure forcing a quick end to a debate

Cloture, closure or, informally, a guillotine, is a motion or process in parliamentary procedure aimed at bringing debate to a quick end.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliamentary procedure</span> Guidelines to conduct meetings

Parliamentary procedures are the accepted rules, ethics, and customs governing meetings of an assembly or organization. Their object is to allow orderly deliberation upon questions of interest to the organization and thus to arrive at the sense or the will of the majority of the assembly upon these questions. Self-governing organizations follow parliamentary procedure to debate and reach group decisions, usually by vote, with the least possible friction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Point of order</span> Parliamentary procedure drawing attention to a rules violation

In parliamentary procedure, a point of order occurs when someone draws attention to a rules violation in a meeting of a deliberative assembly.

A censure is an expression of strong disapproval or harsh criticism. In parliamentary procedure, it is a debatable main motion that could be adopted by a majority vote. Among the forms that it can take are a stern rebuke by a legislature, a spiritual penalty imposed by a church, or a negative judgment pronounced on a theological proposition. It is usually non-binding, unlike a motion of no confidence.

A repeal is the removal or reversal of a law. There are two basic types of repeal; a repeal with a re-enactment is used to replace the law with an updated, amended, or otherwise related law, or a repeal without replacement so as to abolish its provisions altogether.

In parliamentary procedure, unanimous consent, also known as general consent, or in the case of the parliaments under the Westminster system, leave of the house, is a situation in which no member present objects to a proposal.

A parliamentary authority is a book of rules for conducting business in deliberative assemblies. Several different books have been used by legislative assemblies and by organizations' deliberative bodies.

In US parliamentary procedure, the previous question is generally used as a motion to end debate on a pending proposal and bring it to an immediate vote. The meaning of this specialized motion has nothing to do with any question previously considered by the assembly.

A committee of the whole is a meeting of a legislative or deliberative assembly using procedural rules that are based on those of a committee, except that in this case the committee includes all members of the assembly. As with other (standing) committees, the activities of a committee of the whole are limited to considering and making recommendations on matters that the assembly has referred to it; it cannot take up other matters or vote directly on the assembly's business. The purpose of a committee of the whole is to relax the usual limits on debate, allowing a more open exchange of views without the urgency of a final vote. Debates in a committee of the whole may be recorded but are often excluded from the assembly's minutes. After debating, the committee submits its conclusions to the assembly and business continues according to the normal rules.

Deliberative assemblies – bodies that use parliamentary procedure to arrive at decisions – use several methods of voting on motions. The regular methods of voting in such bodies are a voice vote, a rising vote, and a show of hands. Additional forms of voting include a recorded vote and balloting.

In parliamentary procedure, reconsideration of a motion may be done on a matter previously decided. The motion to "reconsider" is used for this purpose. This motion originated in the United States and is generally not used in parliaments. A special form of this motion is reconsider and enter on the minutes.

In parliamentary procedure, a motion to appeal from the decision of the chair is used to challenge a ruling of the chair.

In parliamentary procedure, a motion is a formal proposal by a member of a deliberative assembly that the assembly take a particular action. These may include legislative motions, budgetary motions, supplementary budgetary motions, and petitionary motions.

In United States parliamentary procedure, a suspension of the rules allows a deliberative assembly to set aside its normal rules to do something that it could not do otherwise. However, there are rules that cannot be suspended.

Debate in parliamentary procedure refers to discussion on the merits of a pending question; that is, whether it should or should not be agreed to. It is also commonly referred to as "discussion".

In parliamentary procedure, requests and inquiries are motions used by members of a deliberative assembly to obtain information or to do or have something done that requires permission of the assembly. Except for a request to be excused from a duty, these requests and inquiries are not debatable nor amendable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tilson's Manual</span> 1948 parliamentary authority text

Tilson's Manual, or A Manual of Parliamentary Procedure, is a parliamentary authority written by John Q. Tilson and published in 1948.

Parliamentary procedure is the body of rules, ethics, and customs governing meetings and other operations of clubs, organizations, legislative bodies, and other deliberative assemblies. General principles of parliamentary procedure include rule of the majority with respect for the minority.

In parliamentary procedure, the verb to table has the opposite meaning in the United States from that of the rest of the world: