Sentencing Advisory Council

Last updated

The Sentencing Advisory Council of Victoria is an independent statutory body that was established by the Victorian Government in 2004 to conduct research on sentencing in Victoria, Australia. [1] The Council comprises a board of between 11 and 14 directors, who are supported by a secretary. In Australia, there are also sentencing councils in New South Wales, [2] Queensland [3] and Tasmania. [4] There are also sentencing councils in some overseas jurisdictions, such as in England and Wales and in Scotland.

Contents

History

In 2000, the Victorian Government requested a review of aspects of Victoria's sentencing laws, which was undertaken by Professor Arie Frieberg. The 2002 report arising out of that review, Pathways to Justice, recommended a number of changes to Victoria's sentencing system, including the establishment of a Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council. [5] That legislation was passed in 2003, and the Council formally came into operation in 2004.[ citation needed ] Professor Frieberg was the inaugural Chair of the Council from 2004 to his retirement in 2022 [6] and was also the Chair of the Tasmanian Sentencing Advisory Council until 2021. [7]

Directors

The legislation establishing the Council outlines a number of specific qualifications to be nominated by the Attorney-General of Victoria and then appointed by the Governor of Victoria. Some of the qualifications include the need for a person to be considered a highly experienced prosecution and defence lawyer with other criminal justice experience. [8] [5]

References from the Attorney-General

Over the years, Victoria’s Attorney-General has given the Council terms of reference seeking its advice on a range of topics, such as the sentencing of family violence offenders, [9] reforms to restitution and compensation orders [10] and the introduction of a sentencing guidelines council. [11] The Council’s responses to terms of reference have resulted in changes to maximum penalties for offences [12] and breaches of intervention orders; [13] the abolition of suspended sentences, [14] the introduction of a sentence indication scheme [15] and the addition of hatred and prejudice as a factor in sentencing. [16] [ original research ]

Community education

The Council hosts an online interactive sentencing simulation known as ‘Virtual You be the Judge’, [17] presenting face-to-face community education sessions for adults, developing and publishing teaching materials and lesson plans, [18] and developing and publishing plain-language guides to sentencing law and practice. [19]

Related Research Articles

A statute of limitations, known in civil law systems as a prescriptive period, is a law passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated. In most jurisdictions, such periods exist for both criminal law and civil law such as contract law and property law, though often under different names and with varying details.

A suspended sentence is a sentence on conviction for a criminal offence, the serving of which the court orders to be deferred in order to allow the defendant to perform a period of probation. If the defendant does not break the law during that period and fulfills the particular conditions of the probation, the sentence is usually considered fulfilled. If the defendant commits another offence or breaks the terms of probation, the court can order the sentence to be served, in addition to any sentence for the new offence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Probation and parole officer</span> Officials who supervise the conduct of offenders on community supervision

A probation or parole officer is an official appointed or sworn to investigate, report on, and supervise the conduct of convicted offenders on probation or those released from incarceration to community supervision such as parole. Most probation and parole officers are employed by the government of the jurisdiction in which they operate, although some are employed by private companies that provide contracted services to the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magistrates' court (England and Wales)</span> Lower court in the criminal legal system of England and Wales

In England and Wales, a magistrates' court is a lower court which hears matters relating to summary offences and some triable either-way matters. Some civil law issues are also decided here, notably family proceedings. In 2010, there were 320 magistrates' courts in England and Wales; by 2020, a decade later, 164 of those had closed. The jurisdiction of magistrates' courts and rules governing them are set out in the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980.

A Koori Court is a separate division of the Magistrates', County and Children's Courts of Victoria, Australia. The Koori Court (Magistrates), Children's Koori Court, and County Koori Court hear selected cases, where Indigenous Australians have identified as such and requested the case be transferred to it. The first Koori Court was established in Shepparton in 2002. Koori Court aims to reduce recidivism by involving Elders, other respected persons in the Aboriginal community, and court advisors to provide information about the background of the defendant, and to advise on culturally appropriate sentences.

Preventive detention is an imprisonment that is putatively justified for non-punitive purposes, most often to prevent further criminal acts.

The Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR), also known as NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, is an agency of the Department of Communities and Justice responsible for research into crime and criminal justice and evaluation of the initiatives designed to reduce crime and reoffending in the state of New South Wales, Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Law Act 1977</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Law Act 1977 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Most of it only applies to England and Wales. It creates the offence of conspiracy in English law. It also created offences concerned with criminal trespass in premises, made changes to sentencing, and created an offence of falsely reporting the existence of a bomb.

The New South Wales Sentencing Council is an advisory body established by the New South Wales Government to provide guidelines and to promote consistency in sentencing of offenders in New South Wales, a state of Australia. The council provides advice and counsel to the Attorney General of New South Wales on issues relating to sentencing, parole periods for sentences, trends, and the operation of parole. The council aims to promote consistency and transparency in sentencing and promoting public understanding of the sentencing process. The Sentencing Council consists of members appointed by the attorney general. Those members are made up from a diverse background to better represent the views of the community. They include retired judges, law enforcement officers, defence lawyers, indigenous community members and persons associated with victims of crime.

Arie Freiberg is an Israeli-born Australian legal academic. He was formerly Dean of Monash Law School from 2004 and retired at the end of 2012. His expertise is in criminal law and criminology and he was the Chair of the Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council from 2004 to 2022. His research has focussed on sentencing and the administration of criminal justice, but he has over one hundred publications in many areas of law.

Ian L. Gray AM is a retired Victorian lawyer, and former judge, chief magistrate and State Coroner at the Coroners Court of Victoria.

The youth justice system in England and Wales comprises the organs and processes that are used to prosecute, convict and punish persons under 18 years of age who commit criminal offences. The principal aim of the youth justice system is to prevent offending by children and young persons.

Aboriginal Community Court, or Aboriginal court was the name given to the specialised courts dealing with Indigenous Australian offenders in the state of Western Australia between 2006 and 2015.

In Australia, domestic violence (DV) is defined by the Family Law Act 1975. Each state and territory also has its own legislation, some of which broadens the scope of that definition, and terminology varies. It has been identified as a major health and welfare issue. Family violence occurs across all ages and demographic groups, but mostly affects women and children, and at particular risk are three groups: Indigenous, young and pregnant women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in New Zealand</span> Overview of crime in New Zealand

Crime in New Zealand encompasses criminal law, crime statistics, the nature and characteristics of crime, sentencing, punishment, and public perceptions of crime. New Zealand criminal law has its origins in English criminal law, which was codified into statute by the New Zealand parliament in 1893. Although New Zealand remains a common law jurisdiction, all criminal offences and their penalties are codified in New Zealand statutes.

Indigenous Australians are both convicted of crimes and imprisoned at a disproportionately higher rate in Australia, as well as being over-represented as victims of crime. As of September 2019, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander prisoners represented 28% of the total adult prisoner population, while accounting for 2% of the general adult population. Various explanations have been given for this over-representation, both historical and more recent. Federal and state governments and Indigenous groups have responded with various analyses, programs and measures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Punishment in Australia</span>

Punishment in Australia arises when an individual has been accused or convicted of breaking the law through the Australian criminal justice system. Australia uses prisons, as well as community corrections. When awaiting trial, prisoners may be kept in specialised remand centres or within other prisons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sentencing in England and Wales</span>

Sentencing in England and Wales refers to a bench of magistrates or district judge in a magistrate's court or a judge in the Crown Court passing sentence on a person found guilty of a criminal offence. In deciding the sentence, the court will take into account a number of factors: the type of offence and how serious it is, the timing of any plea of guilty, the defendant's character and antecedents, including their criminal record and the defendant's personal circumstances such as their financial circumstances in the case of a fine being imposed.

The totality principle is a common law principle which applies when a court imposes multiple sentences of imprisonment. The principle was first formulated by David Thomas in his 1970 study of the sentencing decisions of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales:

The effect of the totality principle is to require a sentencer who has passed a series of sentences, each properly calculated in relation to the offence for which it is imposed and each properly made consecutive in accordance with the principles governing consecutive sentences, to review the aggregate sentence and consider whether the aggregate is 'just and appropriate'. The principle has been stated many times in various forms: 'when a number of offences are being dealt with and specific punishments in respect of them are being totted up to make a total, it is always necessary for the court to take a last look at the total just to see whether it looks wrong'; 'when ... cases of multiplicity of offences come before the court, the court must not content itself by doing the arithmetic and passing the sentence which the arithmetic produces. It must look at the totality of the criminal behaviour and ask itself what is the appropriate sentence for all the offences.'

In the Australian legal system, a good behaviour bond is a type of non-custodial sentence which involves the condition of the offender's "good behaviour" for a set period. The condition of "good behaviour" primarily requires the offender to obey the law, but may also include additional probation officer supervision, mandatory medical treatment or participation in rehabilitation, counselling and intervention programs. These imposed conditions are determined by state legislation and at the magistrate's discretion. A good behaviour bond may be established with or without a recorded legal conviction for the offence. The specific conditions which constitute a good behaviour bond, as well as the consequences for breaching them, vary under each Australian state or territory's legislation, but overall are used most commonly for first-time and juvenile offenders.

References

  1. "Sentencing Amendment Act 2003 (Vic)" (PDF). 6 May 2003.
  2. ‘NSW Sentencing Council’. NSW Government.
  3. ‘Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council’. Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council.
  4. ‘The Sentencing Advisory Council’. Tasmanian Sentencing Advisory Council.
  5. 1 2 ‘About Us’, Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council.
  6. ’Retirement Of Sentencing Advisory Council Chair', Premier of Victoria (2022).
  7. ‘About the Sentencing Advisory Council’. Tasmanian Sentencing Advisory Council.
  8. Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) s 108F.
  9. Swift, Certain and Fair Approaches to Sentencing Family Violence Offenders: Report, 2017
  10. Sentencing Advisory Council, Restitution and Compensation Orders: Report, 2018
  11. Sentencing Advisory Council, A Sentencing Guidelines Council for Victoria: Report, 2018
  12. Parliament of Victoria, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Council, Fifty-Sixth Parliament, First Session, Wednesday, 12 March 2008, p. 687
  13. Parliament of Victoria, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Council, Fifty-Sixth Parliament, First Session, Friday, 12 September 2008, p. 3819
  14. Parliament of Victoria, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Council, Fifty-Sixth Parliament, First Session, Questions on Notice, Thursday, 26 February 2009, p. 1039
  15. Parliament of Victoria, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, Fifty-Seventh Parliament, First Session, p. 3152
  16. Parliament of Victoria, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Council, Fifty-Sixth Parliament, First Session, Tuesday, 24 November 2009, pp.5558
  17. Dennis Byles and Chris Gill, ‘Citizen Judges’ (2014) 88(12) Law Institute Journal 52.
  18. ‘Legal studies resources’. Victoria Law Foundation.
  19. Sentencing Advisory Council, A Quick Guide to Sentencing (5th edition, 2021).