Plain language

Last updated

Plain language is writing designed to ensure the reader understands as quickly, easily, and completely as possible. [1] Plain language strives to be easy to read, understand, and use. [2] It avoids verbose, convoluted language and jargon. In many countries, laws mandate that public agencies use plain language to increase access to programs and services. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities includes plain language in its definition of communication. [3]

Contents

Definition

Most literacy and communications scholars agree that plain language means:

Plain language focuses on ways of writing a text so that it is clear, concise, pertinent, efficient, and flows well for the reader. [4] The Center for Plain Language states that: "[a] document, web site or other information is in plain language if the target audience can read it, understand what they read, and confidently act on it". [5] Writing in plain language does not mean oversimplifying the concepts, but presenting the information in a way that makes it easier to understand and use by a wider audience. [6] Texts written in plain language are still formal, but are easier to read and inspire confidence for the reader. [7]

Using plain language in communications ultimately improves efficiency, because there is less ambiguity for the readers, and less time is taken for clarifications and explanations. [8] Clear communication improves the user's experience with the organization, ultimately creating trust in the company. [9]

Guidelines and tips

Writers who wish to write in plain language must first and foremost consider their target audience. [5] This should influence what information is included in the text and how it is written. [5] Different audiences have different needs, and require different information. [5] When writing, it is important to consider what the target audience needs to accomplish, and what and how much information they need to complete it. [5] The needs of the target audience will also affect the chosen vocabulary: writing for someone in the same field as the author is different from writing for someone whose native language is not English. [10]

Provide informative headings, topic sentences, and frequent summaries to help orient the reader. For complex documents, create a comprehensive table of contents. [11]

Organize the text logically: the most important information should be mentioned first, in the text as a whole and in every individual paragraph. [10] Headings help the reader skim the text more rapidly to find what they're looking for. [5] Sentences should be kept short, and only include necessary information. [5] A long, verbose sentence tends to present too much information at once, and blurs its main point. [10] The text should be direct and concise, and have an easy flow to it. [5]

The chosen vocabulary must remain simple and familiar. [10] Everyday language should be favoured against acronyms, jargon and legal language. [8] Plain language favours the use of the verb form of the word, instead of the noun form. [8] To increase clarity, use the active voice, in which the subject does the action of the verb. [10] Sentences written in plain language have a positive construction and address the reader directly. [8]

Writing in plain language also takes into account the presentation of the text. It is important to choose a font that is easy to read, and set it to an adequate size. [10] Sentences written in capital letters are harder to read because the letters are less distinguishable from one another. [10] Simple design elements like leaving white spaces, using bullets, and choosing contrasting colours encourages a user to read the text and increases readability. [6]

Purposes

Reading comprehension

Proponents of plain language adoption argue that it improves reading comprehension and readability, and grants readers greater access to information. [12] [13] Simple language allows documents to be read and understood by a larger audience, as plain language adoption often involves rewriting very technical and field-specific documents, like legal and medical documents. [14]

Accessibility

Some scholars promote plain language use as a means of making documents accessible, especially for disabled readers or those who lack the expertise and education to understand overly technical documents. Simpler language can decrease a reader's cognitive load, and improve information retention in readers who normally struggle to read complex documents. [12] Changes in font, text size, and colour can make texts more readable for individuals with impaired vision. [15] Some scholars view plain language from a social justice perspective as a means of increasing equal access to information, especially for marginalized populations that might have decreased access to education. [12]

Ethical action

While plain language has positive practical outcomes across many situations, it can also be understood within the framework of ethical action. [16] While not all plain language practitioners and scholars agree that "Plain language is a civil right", as the motto for the US-based Center for Plain Language declares, many practitioners agree that using plain language is part of ethical action, such as being responsive, respectful, honest, truthful and fair. On the other hand, plain language can also be used for unethical ends, such as to obscure or withhold truths. Willerton proposes the BUROC framework for identifying situations requiring the ethical action of plain language: bureaucratic, unfamiliar, rights-oriented, critical. [16]

Examples

Original textPlain language
High-quality learning environments are a necessary precondition for facilitation and enhancement of the ongoing learning process.Children need good schools so they can learn well. [17]
Firearm relinquishment is a mandatory condition.You must hand over your guns. [18]
This temporary injunction remains in effect against both parties until the final decree of divorce or order of legal separation is entered, the complaint is dismissed, the parties reach agreement, or until the court modifies or dissolves this injunction. This injunction shall not preclude either party from applying to the court for further temporary orders, an extended injunction or modification or revocation of this temporary injunction.You must follow this order until the court changes or ends it, your case is finalized or dismissed, or you and your spouse make an agreement. Either spouse may ask the court to change or cancel this order [18] or to issue new orders.
"While we are committed to – and our strategy continues to leverage – our unparalleled global network and footprint, we have identified areas and products where our scale does not provide for meaningful returns. And we will further increase our operating efficiency by reducing excess capacity and expenses, whether they centre on technology, real estate or simplifying our operations."We are a successful company, but today we announced lay-offs. They will save us money. [19] [20]

History

Early history

Cicero argued, "When you wish to instruct, be brief; that men's minds take in quickly what you say, learn its lesson, and retain it faithfully. Every word that is unnecessary only pours over the side of a brimming mind."[ citation needed ]

Shakespeare parodied the pretentious style, as in the speeches of Dogberry in Much Ado About Nothing . The plain, or native style, was, in fact, an entire literary tradition during the English Renaissance, from John Skelton through Ben Jonson and include such poets as Barnabe Googe, George Gascoigne, Walter Raleigh, and perhaps the later work of Fulke Greville. In addition to its purely linguistic plainness, the Plain Style employed an emphatic, pre-Petrarchan prosody (each syllable either clearly stressed or clearly unstressed).

19th century

By the end of the 19th century, scholars began to study the features of plain language. A. L. Sherman, a professor of English literature at the University of Nebraska, wrote Analytics of Literature: A Manual for the Objective Study of English Prose and Poetry in 1893. In this work, Sherman showed that the typical English sentence has shortened over time and that spoken English is a pattern for written English.

Sherman wrote:

Literary English, in short, will follow the forms of the standard spoken English from which it comes. No man should talk worse than he writes, no man writes better than he should talk.... The oral sentence is clearest because it is the product of millions of daily efforts to be clear and strong. It represents the work of the race for thousands of years in perfecting an effective instrument of communication.

1900 to 1950

Two 1921 works, Harry Kitson's "The Mind of the Buyer", and Edward L. Thorndike's "The Teacher's Word Book" picked up where Sherman left off. Kitson's work was the first to apply empirical psychology to advertising. He advised the use of short words and sentences. Thorndike's work contained the frequency ratings of 10,000 words. He recommended using the ratings in his book to grade books not only for students in schools but also for average readers and adults learning English. Thorndike wrote:

It is commonly assumed that children and adults prefer trashy stories in large measure because they are more exciting and more stimulating in respect to sex. There is, however, reason to believe that greater ease of reading in respect to vocabulary, construction, and facts, is a very important cause of preference. A count of the vocabulary of "best sellers" and a summary of it in terms of our list would thus be very instructive.

The 1930s saw many studies on how to make texts more readable. In 1931, Douglas Tyler and Ralph Waples published the results of their two-year study, "What People Want to Read About". In 1934, Ralph Ojemann, Edgar Dale, and Ralph Waples published two studies on writing for adults with limited reading ability. In 1935, educational psychologist William S. Gray teamed up with Bernice Leary to publish their study, "What Makes a Book Readable".

George Orwell's 1946 essay "Politics and the English Language" decried the pretentious diction, meaninglessness, vagueness, and worn-out idioms of political jargon. In 1979, the Plain English Campaign was founded in London to combat "gobbledegook, jargon and legalese". [21]

1951 to 2000

Lyman Bryson at Teachers College in Columbia University led efforts to supply average readers with more books of substance dealing with science and current events. Bryson's students include Irving Lorge and Rudolf Flesch, who became leaders in the plain-language movement. In 1975, Flesch collaborated with J. Peter Kincaid to create the Flesch-Kincaid readability test, which uses an algorithm to produce grade level scores that predict the level of education required to read the selected text. [22] The instrument looks at word length (number of letters) and sentence length (number of words) and produces a score that is tied to a U.S. grade school level. For example, a score of 8.0 means that an eighth grader can read the document.

Others who later led plain language and readability research include educator Edgar Dale of Ohio State, Jeanne S. Chall of the Reading Laboratory of Harvard, and George R. Klare of Ohio University. Their efforts spurred the publication of over 200 readability formulas and 1,000 published studies on readability.

Beginning in 1935, a series of literacy surveys showed that the average reader in the U.S. was an adult of limited reading ability. Today, the average adult in the U.S. reads at the 9th-grade level.

Access to health information, educational and economic development opportunities, and government programs is often referred to in a social justice context. To ensure more community members can access this information, many adult educators, legal writers, and social program developers use plain language principles when they develop public documents[ citation needed ]. The goal of plain language translation is to increase accessibility for those with lower literacy levels.

In the United States, the movement towards plain language legal writing began with the 1963 book Language of the Law, by David Mellinkoff. [23] However, the movement was popularized by Richard Wydick's 1979 book Plain English for Lawyers. [23] This was followed by famous plain language promissory notes by Nationwide Mutual Insurance and Citibank in the 1970s. [13]

Concerned about the large number of suits against its customers to collect bad debts, the bank voluntarily made the decision to implement plain language policies in 1973. [24] That same decade, the consumer-rights movement won legislation that required plain language in contracts, insurance policies, and government regulations. American law schools began requiring students to take legal writing classes that encouraged them to use plain English as much as possible and to avoid legal jargon, except when absolutely necessary. Public outrage with the skyrocketing number of unreadable government forms led to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.

In 1972, the Plain Language Movement received practical political application, when President Richard Nixon decreed that the "Federal Register be written in layman's terms". On March 23, 1978, U.S. President Jimmy Carter signed Executive Order 12044, which said that federal officials must see that each regulation is "written in plain English and understandable to those who must comply with it". [25] President Ronald Reagan rescinded these orders in 1981, but many political agencies continued to follow them. By 1991, eight states had also passed legislation related to plain language. Plain Language Association International (PLAIN) was formed in 1993 as the Plain Language Network. Its membership is international; it was incorporated as a non-profit organization in Canada in 2008. [26] [27] In June 1998, President Bill Clinton issued a memorandum that called for executive departments and agencies to use plain language in all government documents. [25] Vice President Al Gore subsequently led a plain language initiative that formed a group called the Plain Language Action Network (PLAIN) to provide plain language training to government agencies.

21st century

PLAIN provided guidance to federal executive agencies when President Barack Obama signed the Plain Writing Act of 2010, which required federal executive agencies to put all new and revised covered documents into plain language. [28] The Act's sponsor, U.S. Representative Bruce Braley, noted upon its passage that "The writing of documents in the standard vernacular English language will bolster and increase the accountability of government within America and will continue to more effectively save time and money in this country." [29]

Plain language is also gaining traction in U.S. courts and legal aid agencies. [30] [31] California was the first state to adopt plain language court forms and instructions, for which it received the 2003 Burton Award for Outstanding Reform. [32] A 2006 comparative study of plain language court forms concluded that "plain language court forms and instructions are better understood, easier to use, and more economical". [33]

The European Union provides standards for making information easy to read and understand. [34] The rules are comparable to the rules for plain language. Based in Germany there is a dictionary for plain language called Hurraki. [35] In France, a 2002 decision by the Constitutional Council recognized a constitutional goal of ensuring the "clarity and intelligibility" of French law. [36] In 2013 the Israeli Knesset passed service accessibility regulations which mandated the use of simple language and/or language simplification (Hebrew = פישוט לשוני), [37] which were subsequently codified in 2015 for implementation. [38]

ISO has formed a Working Group within Technical Committee ISO/TC 37 to develop plain language standards and guidelines. Their work began officially towards the end of 2019. It has published standard ISO 24495-1 in 2023. [39]

See also

Opposites of plain language

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plain text</span> Term for computer data consisting only of unformatted characters of readable material

In computing, plain text is a loose term for data that represent only characters of readable material but not its graphical representation nor other objects. It may also include a limited number of "whitespace" characters that affect simple arrangement of text, such as spaces, line breaks, or tabulation characters. Plain text is different from formatted text, where style information is included; from structured text, where structural parts of the document such as paragraphs, sections, and the like are identified; and from binary files in which some portions must be interpreted as binary objects.

Jargon or technical language is the specialized terminology associated with a particular field or area of activity. Jargon is normally employed in a particular communicative context and may not be well understood outside that context. The context is usually a particular occupation, but any ingroup can have jargon. The key characteristic that distinguishes jargon from the rest of a language is its specialized vocabulary, which includes terms and definitions of words that are unique to the context, and terms used in a narrower and more exact sense than when used in colloquial language. This can lead outgroups to misunderstand communication attempts. Jargon is sometimes understood as a form of technical slang and then distinguished from the official terminology used in a particular field of activity.

Obfuscation is the obscuring of the intended meaning of communication by making the message difficult to understand, usually with confusing and ambiguous language. The obfuscation might be either unintentional or intentional, and is accomplished with circumlocution, the use of jargon, and the use of an argot of limited communicative value to outsiders.

Readability is the ease with which a reader can understand a written text. The concept exists in both natural language and programming languages though in different forms. In natural language, the readability of text depends on its content and its presentation. In programming, things such as programmer comments, choice of loop structure, and choice of names can determine the ease with which humans can read computer program code.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human-readable medium and data</span> Presentation of data for humans to read

In computing, a human-readable medium or human-readable format is any encoding of data or information that can be naturally read by humans, resulting in human-readable data. It is often encoded as ASCII or Unicode text, rather than as binary data.

A technical writer is a professional communicator whose task is to convey complex information in simple terms to an audience of the general public or a very select group of readers. Technical writers research and create information through a variety of delivery media. Example types of information include online help, manuals, white papers, design specifications, project plans, and software test plans. With the rise of e-learning, technical writers are increasingly hired to develop online training material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flesch–Kincaid readability tests</span> Indicator for the complexity of texts

The Flesch–Kincaid readability tests are readability tests designed to indicate how difficult a passage in English is to understand. There are two tests: the Flesch Reading-Ease, and the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level. Although they use the same core measures, they have different weighting factors.

In linguistics, the Gunning fog index is a readability test for English writing. The index estimates the years of formal education a person needs to understand the text on the first reading. For instance, a fog index of 12 requires the reading level of a United States high school senior. The test was developed in 1952 by Robert Gunning, an American businessman who had been involved in newspaper and textbook publishing.

Technical communication is communication of technical subject matter such as engineering, science, or technology content. The largest part of it tends to be technical writing, though importantly it often requires aspects of visual communication. Technical communication also encompasses oral delivery modes such as presentations involving technical material. When technical communication occurs in workplace settings, it's considered a major branch of professional communication. In research or R&D contexts, it can overlap with scientific writing.

Reading comprehension is the ability to process written text, understand its meaning, and to integrate with what the reader already knows. Reading comprehension relies on two abilities that are connected to each other: word reading and language comprehension. Comprehension specifically is a "creative, multifaceted process" that is dependent upon four language skills: phonology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics.

Plain English is a mode of writing or speaking the English language intended to be easy to understand regardless of one's familiarity with a given topic. It usually avoids the use of rare words and uncommon euphemisms to explain the subject. Plain English wording is intended to be suitable for almost anyone, and it allows for good understanding to help readers know a topic. It is considered a part of Plain Language.

Professional writing is writing for reward or as a profession; as a product or object, professional writing is any form of written communication produced in a workplace environment or context that enables employees to, for example, communicate effectively among themselves, help leadership make informed decisions, advise clients, comply with federal, state, or local regulatory bodies, bid for contracts, etc. Professional writing is widely understood to be mediated by the social, rhetorical, and material contexts within which it is produced. For example, in a business office, a memorandum can be used to provide a solution to a problem, make a suggestion, or convey information. Other forms of professional writing commonly generated in the workplace include email, letters, reports, and instructions. In seeking to inform, persuade, instruct, stimulate debate, or encourage action from recipients, skilled professional writers make adjustments to different degrees of shared context, e.g., from a relatively accessible style useful for unsolicited contact letter to prospective clients to a technical report that relies on a highly specialized in-house vocabulary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal writing</span> Pleading in civil and criminal law

Legal writing involves the analysis of fact patterns and presentation of arguments in documents such as legal memoranda and briefs. One form of legal writing involves drafting a balanced analysis of a legal problem or issue. Another form of legal writing is persuasive, and advocates in favor of a legal position. Another form involves drafting legal instruments, such as contracts and wills.

The SMOG grade is a measure of readability that estimates the years of education needed to understand a piece of writing. SMOG is an acronym for "Simple Measure of Gobbledygook".

Rudolf Franz Flesch was an Austrian-born naturalized American author, and also a readability expert and writing consultant who was a vigorous proponent of plain English in the United States. He created the Flesch Reading Ease test and was co-creator of the Flesch–Kincaid readability tests. Flesch advocated use of phonics rather than sight reading to enable students to sound-out unfamiliar words.

Technical translation is a type of specialized translation involving the translation of documents produced by technical writers, or more specifically, texts which relate to technological subject areas or texts which deal with the practical application of scientific and technological information. While the presence of specialized terminology is a feature of technical texts, specialized terminology alone is not sufficient for classifying a text as "technical" since numerous disciplines and subjects which are not "technical" possess what can be regarded as specialized terminology. Technical translation covers the translation of many kinds of specialized texts and requires a high level of subject knowledge and mastery of the relevant terminology and writing conventions.

Easy read is a method of presenting written information to make it easier to understand for people with difficulty reading.

Form and Document Creation is one of the things that technical communicators do as part of creating deliverables for their companies or clients. Document design is: "the field of theory and practice aimed at creating comprehensible, persuasive and usable functional documents". These forms and documents can have many different purposes such as collecting or providing information.

The Dale–Chall readability formula is a readability test that provides a numeric gauge of the comprehension difficulty that readers come upon when reading a text. It uses a list of 3000 words that groups of fourth-grade American students could reliably understand, considering any word not on that list to be difficult.

Officialese, bureaucratese, or governmentese is language that sounds official. It is the "language of officialdom". Officialese is characterized by a preference for wordy, long sentences; complex words, code words, or buzzwords over simple, traditional ones; vagueness over directness; and passive over active voice. The history of officialese can be traced to the history of officialdom, as far back as the eldest human civilizations and their surviving official writings.

References

  1. ↑ Robert Leon Cooper (1989). Language Planning and Social Change . Cambridge University Press. p.  60. ISBN   978-0-521-33641-3. Plain Language Movement.
  2. ↑ Garner, Bryan A. (2009). Garner on Language and Writing: Selected Essays and Speeches of Bryan A. Garner. Chicago: American Bar Association. p. 295. ISBN   978-1-60442-445-4.
  3. ↑ United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Archived 2016-12-02 at the Wayback Machine , Article 2 - Definitions. 13 December 2006, A/RES/61/106, Annex I. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  4. ↑ About Plain Language. (n.d.). Plain Language Association International. Retrieved from : http://www.plainlanguagenetwork.org/About_Plain_Language/aboutplainlanguage.html.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Write better. (2014). Center for plain language. Retrieved from : http://centerforplainlanguage.org/5-steps-to-plain-language/
  6. 1 2 Public Works and Government Services Canada. (2014). 13 Plain Language. The Canadian Style. Retrieved from : http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect13&info0=13; and About Plain Language. (n.d.). Plain Language Association International. Retrieved from : http://www.plainlanguagenetwork.org/About_Plain_Language/aboutplainlanguage.html
  7. ↑ Public Works and Government Services Canada. (2014). 13 Plain Language. The Canadian Style. Retrieved from : http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect13&info0=13; and Write better. (2014). Center for plain language. Retrieved from : http://centerforplainlanguage.org/5-steps-to-plain-language/
  8. 1 2 3 4 About Plain Language. (n.d.). Plain Language Association International. Retrieved from : http://www.plainlanguagenetwork.org/About_Plain_Language/aboutplainlanguage.html
  9. ↑ About Plain Language. (n.d.). Plain Language Association International. Retrieved from : http://www.plainlanguagenetwork.org/About_Plain_Language/aboutplainlanguage.html; and Write better. (2014). Center for plain language. Retrieved from : http://centerforplainlanguage.org/5-steps-to-plain-language/
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Public Works and Government Services Canada. (2014). 13 Plain Language. The Canadian Style. Retrieved from : http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect13&info0=13
  11. ↑ Byrne, D (2008). "Writing Government Policies and Procedures in Plain Language". Business Communication Quarterly. 71 (1): 88–92. doi:10.1177/1080569907313376. S2CID   168142843.
  12. 1 2 3 Cheung, I. W. (December 2017). "Plain Language to Minimize Cognitive Load: A Social Justice Perspective". IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 60 (4): 448–457. doi:10.1109/TPC.2017.2759639. ISSN   1558-1500. S2CID   37605494.
  13. 1 2 Kimble, Joseph (December 1992). "Plain English: A Charter for Clear Writing" (PDF). Michigan Bar Journal.
  14. ↑ Williams, Christopher. "Legal English and Plain Language: an introduction".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. ↑ "The case for the use of plain English to increase web accessibility | Request PDF". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  16. 1 2 Willerton, Russell (2015). Plain Language and Ethical Action. United States: Routledge. pp. 55–75. ISBN   978-0-415-74104-0.
  17. ↑ "Before and after". Plain English Campaign. 24 July 2012. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  18. 1 2 Mindlin, Maria. "Readability" (2010). Transcend Translations.
  19. ↑ Derek Thompson (5 December 2012). "Citigroup Eliminates 11,000 Jobs in History's Most Corporate-Jargony Paragraph Ever". The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  20. ↑ "Citigroup Announces Repositioning Actions to Further Reduce Expenses and Improve Efficiency".
  21. ↑ Plain English Campaign. Retrieved August 16, 2011, from: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk
  22. ↑ Kinkaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., R.L., & Chissom, B.S. (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75. Chief of Naval Technical Training: Naval Air Station Memphis.
  23. 1 2 D., Johnson, Lori (2015). "Say the Magic Word: A Rhetorical Analysis of Contract Drafting Choices". Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Law.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ↑ Asprey, M., (2003). Plain language around the world. Plain language for lawyers. The Federation Press. Retrieved September 23, 2008, from "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-07-28. Retrieved 2008-09-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  25. 1 2 "Background: Plain Writing Legislative History, 2007-2010" Archived 2012-03-17 at the Wayback Machine , 2010, Irwin Berent, Plain Writing Association
  26. ↑ "About PLAIN". Plain Language Association International. Archived from the original on 2008-11-10. Retrieved 2008-11-13.
  27. ↑ "Speech by SEC Commissioner: Remarks at the Plain Language Association International's Fifth International Conference". Securities and Exchange Commission. 2005. Retrieved 2008-11-12.
  28. ↑ Pub. L.   111–274 (text) (PDF)§4(b)
  29. ↑ "Obama Signs 'Plain Writing' Law". ABC World News with Diane Sawyer. ABC News. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
  30. ↑ Dyson, Dana D.; Schellenberg, Kathryn (4 March 2017). "Access to Justice: The Readability of Legal Services Corporation Legal Aid Internet Services". Journal of Poverty. 21 (2): 142–165. doi:10.1080/10875549.2016.1186773. S2CID   156782675.
  31. ↑ McLernon, Sean (2016). "Why Courts Need to Embrace Plain Language". Georgetown Journal on Poverty and Law. 24: 381.
  32. ↑ "About", Civil Jury Instructions Resource Center. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from: www.courts.ca.gov/partners/313.htm
  33. ↑ Mindlin, Maria. "Is Plain Language better? A Comparative Readability Study of Plain Language Court Forms", Scribes Journal of Legal Writing, Vol. 10, 2005-2006. Retrieved November 28, 2011, from: www.transcend.net/library/html/PLStudy.html
  34. ↑ European standards for making information easy to read and understand. Retrieved September 12, 2022, from: https://www.inclusion-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/EN_Information_for_all.pdf
  35. ↑ Hurraki.org Plain Language Dictionary. Retrieved March 20, 2016, from: http://hurraki.org/english
  36. ↑ Cons. const., n° 2001-455 DC, 12 janv. 2002. from: http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/les-decisions/acces-par-date/decisions-depuis-1959/2002/2001-455-dc/decision-n-2001-455-dc-du-12-janvier-2002.668.html
  37. ↑ "תקנות שוויון זכויות לאנשים עם מוגבלות (התאמות נגישות לשירות), תשע"ג-5102" (PDF). Israel Department of Justice. The Israel Department of Justice. Retrieved 15 October 2019.
  38. ↑ "Accessibility of the built environment: Communication (in Hebrew)" (PDF). The Standards Institution of Israel. Retrieved 15 October 2019.
  39. ↑ "ISO 24495-1:2023: Plain language – Part 1: Governing principles and guidelines". ISO. Retrieved 2024-10-02.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.