Sicilian business

Last updated
An engraving of the seal of Edmund, son of Henry III of England, in his capacity as nominal King of Sicily during the "Sicilian business", produced in 1254 by order of Henry III on behalf of the child-king. An account of the events produced in England by the grant of the Kingdom of Sicily to Prince Edmund, second son of King Henry the Third Fleuron T142892-1.png
An engraving of the seal of Edmund, son of Henry III of England, in his capacity as nominal King of Sicily during the "Sicilian business", produced in 1254 by order of Henry III on behalf of the child-king.

The "Sicilian business" is a historiographical term used to describe the failed attempt by Henry III of England to claim the Kingdom of Sicily for his son Edmund, who had been offered the throne by the papacy. Sicily, established in the twelfth century as a theoretical papal fief, had been ruled by Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II from 1198 until his death in 1250; Pope Innocent IV now sought to install an agreeable sovereign to succeed his longtime adversary. After failed negotiations with Edmund's uncles Richard of Cornwall and Charles of Anjou, the papacy formally offered the throne to the English prince in 1254. For the project, Henry III was tasked with delivering Edmund and armed forces to Sicily to claim it from Manfred, who was serving as regent for Frederick II's grandson Conradin; the papacy was to offer assistance.

Contents

A strategic marriage were planned for Edmund; potential brides were the dowager queen of Cyprus or a daughter of Manfred in order to resolve the dispute over the kingdom. Neither union came to fruition, and despite continued attempts to secure support and financing, Henry III's efforts to establish Edmund as the Sicilian monarch faced numerous setbacks. Pope Alexander IV, who had succeeded Innocent IV in 1254, was no longer in a position to effectively finance the project, demanding monetary payment from Henry III as compensation. Finding only minimal support from Parliament and faced with the threat of excommunication from Rome, Henry III resorted to extorting money from his domestic clergy in an attempt to pay the debts. The "Sicilian business" became entangled with broader political troubles in England, and the project ultimately collapsed. Pope Urban IV formally revoked the grant of the Kingdom of Sicily to Edmund in 1263 and instead consigned it to Charles of Anjou, who successfully assumed control of the kingdom in 1266.

The failure of the project has historically been a source of ignominy for Henry III, with contemporary barons in England citing the incident as justification for restricting the monarch's powers. Historians have likewise singled out the incident as one of the motivations for the political upheaval that would occur in England in the years following, but some recent scholarship has questioned this point of view, instead arguing that the mission's lack of success was not entirely the fault of Henry III but rather a consequence of the intricate political situation in Europe.

Background

The territorial extent of the Kingdom of Sicily in 1190, a few decades following the events of the "Sicilian business". Kingdom of Sicily 1190.svg
The territorial extent of the Kingdom of Sicily in 1190, a few decades following the events of the "Sicilian business".

By 1129, Count Roger II of Sicily had successfully consolidated power in the southern areas of the Italian peninsula, and by the following year, his barons urged him to assume a royal title. [2] That same year, Anacletus II (r. 1130–1138; who was engaged in a power struggle over the papal throne) dispatched an emissary to enthrone Roger as king; the coronation ceremony occurred on 25 December 1130. [2] The inaugural monarchs of the fledgling Kingdom of Sicily, the Normans, [lower-alpha 1] possessed a unique relationship with the Catholic Church. Authorization for the establishment of the kingdom, as well as royal authority, were received from the Pope, a dynamic that caused the historian David Abulafia to refer to the Sicilian sovereigns as "papal vassals". [4] As such, Sicily was theoretically a papal fief. Concurrently, the Holy Roman Emperors were engaged in recurrent conflict with the papacy's ostensible, universal temporal authority. [4] By the time of Frederick II, who ruled both the Holy Roman Empire (r. 1220–1250) and the Kingdom of Sicily (r. 1198–1250) in personal union, the struggle between the parties had intensified to extreme proportions, [5] [6] the Emperor having Sicily confiscated from him in 1245. [7] After Frederick's purported deposition, Pope Innocent IV (r. 1243–1254) embarked on a search for a new king who would be agreeable to the papacy and be able to contend with the Emperor. [7] [8] Offers were forwarded to the courts of the kingdoms of France and England, but Frederick's incumbency dissuaded any acceptances of the Sicilian throne. [9]

The search for a king

A thirteenth century family tree depicting of Henry III and his five children; from left to right: Edward, Margaret, Edmund, Beatrice, and Katherine. Jindra3 deti.jpg
A thirteenth century family tree depicting of Henry III and his five children; from left to right: Edward, Margaret, Edmund, Beatrice, and Katherine.

Frederick II died on 13 December 1250, and his death only revitalised the efforts of the papacy to displace the Hohenstaufen dynasty from their domains. [10] In his will, the late Emperor bequeathed the Kingdom of Sicily to his son Conrad, King of Germany (r. 1237–1254). [11] Frederick's successor found himself in conflict with Innocent IV, who sought to undermine the personal union of the German and Sicilian kingdoms. In August 1252, Innocent IV sent letters to Henry III of England and Louis IX of France, attempting to find a potential monarch in either of their brothers, Richard of Cornwall or Charles of Anjou, respectively. [1] [12] Richard rejected the offer, likening the difficulty of claiming the kingdom to removing the moon from the sky; Charles likewise turned down the proposal on the advice of Louis and their mother Blanche of Castile. [13]

In January of the following year, Henry III conveyed his gratitude to the Pope for the offer of Sicily, and by December, the papal nuncio Albert of Parma was authorised to convey to Henry III the terms under which Sicily would be transferred. [14] These terms remain unknown, but they would have been similar to those offered to Charles: payment of 1000 ounces of gold, a further 10,000 for the restoration of a papal enclave in Sicily, an yearly tribute of 2000 ounces to Rome, and the provision of fifty knights to the papacy. These conditions emphasised the vassal relationship of the kings of Sicily to the papacy; they also reflected Innocent IV's goal of safeguarding the Papal States and sundering the union of the Empire and Sicily; indeed, the establishment of a new monarch in Sicily would ensure that the Pope's domains would not suffer the strain they had endured under Frederick II. [15] By January 1254, the discord between the papacy and the Hohenstaufen king had escalated: Conrad leveled allegations of heresy and usurpation against the pontiff, which engendered his excommunication by Innocent IV the following month. [16] Conrad died on 21 May; the only legitimate Hohenstaufen heir remaining was his two-year-old son Conradin. [17] On his deathbed, Conrad entrusted Conradin to the care of Innocent IV, who promptly assumed papal control over Sicily (claiming it had reverted to the Papacy) with the understanding that Conradin would assume power in the future. [18] Manfred, an illegitimate son of Frederick II, assumed the regency for Conradin, who was sent to Bavaria. [19] The political situation in Europe was altered as a result of Conrad's death and the usurpation of power by Manfred. Louis IX personally disapproved of the regent's character, but regarded the throne of Sicily as rightfully Conradin's. [9]

Richard remained unenthused about the prospect of the Sicilian throne, instead focusing his energies on his election as King of the Romans. [13] His brother Henry III was interested in the prospect of installing his younger son Edmund as a monarch; whether the prince was himself interested is unknown. [20] The prince's candidacy was likely proposed earlier, but did not materialise due to the candidacy of Charles of Anjou and Henry's personal regard for Frederick II's son Henry (his nephew through his sister Isabella of England) and his hereditary rights. [21] After Charles had formally declined the throne on 30 October 1253 and Henry of Hohenstaufen's death a short time afterward, Henry III again expressed interest in the Sicilian throne, entering into discussions with Albert of Parma. [21] After a brief attempt to reconcile with Manfred that came to nothing, Innocent IV again resumed correspondence with the court of England in which he accepted Edmund as monarch of Sicily, but also ambiguously mentioned the rights of Conradin. [22]

Selection of Edmund of England

Motivations of Henry III

The historian Björn Weiler argues that "...the Sicilian Business was a logical continuation of the king's crusading plans, and indicative of a diplomatic approach increasingly focused on the Mediterranean, but it was also driven by competition with and feat of the Capetians". [10] Situating Edmund on a foreign throne would have brought great prestige to the royal house of England, and with Plantagenet presence in the Mediterranean, Henry III could make use of the kingdom as a base from which he could initiate a future crusade. [23]

Edmund as nominal King of Sicily

A thirteenth century depiction of Edmund of England. Edmund 1.jpg
A thirteenth century depiction of Edmund of England.

Albert formally offered the Kingdom of Sicily to the ten year old Edmund on 6 March 1254; [10] the grant was affirmed by Innocent IV on 14 May. Henry III accepted the offer of the wealthy kingdom on behalf of his son. [24] The "Sicilian business" would come to dominate English political affairs, despite neither Henry III nor Edmund having been there in person. [10] The people of England were not eager to pay taxes to finance the Italian campaign, which lacked the religious justification that Henry III's crusading taxes did. [20] On 15 May, Henry III ordered the production of a great seal for Edmund in his capacity as nominal monarch. [1] Innocent IV appears to have expected Henry III to act rapidly, insisting that same month that Edmund be delivered to the Continent at once with the incentive of monetary support. [25] In spite of several complications, including a failure to raise substantial money from the English, unrest in Gascony, the upcoming wedding of his heir Edward to Eleanor of Castile, and tensions with the French, Henry III made preparations to claim the Kingdom of Sicily. As part of these preparations, Edmund's relative Thomas of Savoy was raised to the station of Prince of Capua. [25] Innocent IV likewise took steps to consolidate Plantagenet dominion in Sicily by recruiting allies, among them Berthold of Hohenberg, who had been named as regent of Sicily by the late Conrad IV, and Frederick of Antioch, one of Frederick II's natural sons. [26] Through these efforts, the Plantagenet regime in the Kingdom of Sicily was constituted by experienced men who had served under the administration of Conrad IV. [27] On a state visit to the court of Louis IX in December 1254, the French king agreed to not contest Edmund's nomination as King of Sicily. [28]

Innocent IV had died on 7 December and was succeeded by Alexander IV (r. 1254–1261), [29] who pursued a careful diplomatic approach, even entering into discussions with Manfred concerning the acknowledgment of Hohenstaufen dominion in Sicily. The attempted peace failed, and by March Henry III was again urged to make haste for Italy. [30] New talks confirmed Edmund's enfeoffment, but elucidated the conditions of the grant on 9 April 1255. As part of the concession of Sicily by the papacy, several conditions were to be met. The liege kingdom was to be held at the price of 2000 ounces of gold per annum, as well as an appended supply of 300 knights for three months when needed. [30] Because of Edmund's minority, Henry III was to pay homage for Sicily on behalf of his son until he reached the age of fifteen. Additionally, the papacy demanded a payment of 135,541 marks [lower-alpha 2] as compensation for the efforts being made to supplant Manfred. Edmund was also forbidden from ever seeking election as Holy Roman Emperor. [30] Henry III agreed to these terms, and speaking about these conditions, Weiler reasons that "By making Edmund's exercise of regal rights dependent upon his arrival in Sicily, the pope may have hoped that this would provide the necessary incentive for the English court to speed up its preparations"; the urgency was caused by the increasingly precarious situation in Sicily, where Manfred still remained at large. By spring 1255, Manfred had attained several victories and posed a direct threat to the Papal States; Alexander IV was desperate for assistance and attempted to financially support Henry III for a Sicilian expedition, and also called on the courts of Europe for aid. [31] [32]

The Bishop of Bologna arrived in England and formally enfeoffed Edmund with the throne of Sicily in October 1255 on behalf of the Pope. [33] [28] Henry III styled his son as king and presented him with a ring. [34] Accompanying the bishop was the papal nuncio Rostand Masson, who was tasked with collecting the sum of money owed to Rome by Henry III. [28] The situation in the Italian peninsula continued to devolve, as Henry III's sluggishness continued and allowed Manfred to expand his influence in the area. Conradin affirmed Manfred as his representative in Sicily, a show of Hohenstaufen solidarity. [35] Alexander IV requested support from his allies in England, but Henry III was not in a position to meet his requests. His government had rejected his request to raise more funds, and in correspondence with the Pope in 1256, the English king asked for more lenient terms. [35]

Efforts to claim Sicily

A 14th-century illuminated manuscript depicting Louis IX kneeling before Pope Innocent IV, recognisable by his three-tiered papal tiara. Louis9 Innocentius4 Cluny.jpg
A 14th-century illuminated manuscript depicting Louis IX kneeling before Pope Innocent IV, recognisable by his three-tiered papal tiara.

Marriage negotiations

Henry III entered into negotiations in 1256 to organize Edmund's marriage. One potential bride for the young king was Plaisance of Antioch, the dowager queen of Cyprus (and now regent of that kingdom); this possibility mandated that the Cypriot king Hugh II, son of Plaisance, wed Edmund's sister Beatrice. [36] A second marriage alliance was also considered with one of the daughters of Manfred; the conditions of this marriage would see Manfred concede Sicily to Edmund after the marriage occurred. Ultimately, neither marriage came to fruition. [1]

Domestic difficulties

Henry III faced difficulties financing his son's accession to the Sicilian throne. The English were not particularly thrilled with having to finance the endeavor and could not be persuaded otherwise, in spite of Henry III's pleads to be granted a subsidy. The King even paraded Edmund, donned in Sicilian royal regalia, before the English magnates at a parliament in 1257, but to no avail. [1] Manfred's continued presence in the administration of Sicily proved to be a recurring issue as well; by 1257, Manfred had taken control of the entire island of Sicily, and amidst rumours of Conradin's death, the twenty-six year old Manfred was, in spite of the papacy's wishes, crowned King of Sicily on 10 August 1258 at Palermo Cathedral and received homage from the Sicilian nobles. [37] [1]

Despite the large sums forwarded to Rome thus far, Henry III still owed quite an amount. Rostand, who had returned to the Continent, returned to England in March 1257 with the archbishop of Messina to request further payments. The two were received by the King and the twelve year old Edmund, who was dressed in Sicilian robes. [38] At this point, Henry III may have developed hesitations; in April, he cancelled payments to the Pope citing uncertainty as to whether he wished to continue with Edmund's bid for the throne. More lenient terms were offered to the English, but Henry III was commanded to reconcile with France and travel to Sicily with an army of no less than 8500 by March 1259. [39]

Domestically, the "Sicilian business" was part of a wider array of political troubles that eventually gave rise to the 1258 Provisions of Oxford and attempts by the English barons to assert control over the monarchy. [40] [32] [41] These magnates were discontent with many of the unpopular policies of Henry III's reign, including the alarming amount of money being allotted for Edmund's bid for the Sicilian throne, [42] and the baronial government, which has been installed in accordance with the terms of the Provisions of Oxford, requested changes to the conditions of the Sicilian offer; on 18 December 1258, Alexander IV revoked the offer unless the previously discussed conditions were met. By this point, Alexander IV found it increasingly difficult to pay for the project, and facing military pressure, he dispatched an envoy to the English court and, with the threat of excommunication, demanded an army to be sent to Sicily and the payment of £90,000 from Henry III as financial compensation for the efforts to install Edmund. [43] [44] [lower-alpha 3] Requesting assistance from Parliament was again futile; seeing that he could not force the hands of his lay magnates, the King instead resorted to extorting money from the senior clergy of England, who were coerced into signing blank charters, promising to finance effectively unlimited sums of money in support of the "Sicilian business". In this manner, Henry III raised around £40,000. [44] [32] [38] The English Church was displeased, feeling like the money was being wasted on a vain effort. [32] Weiler argues that "...the baronial rebellion put an end to the Sicilian Business, but its demise was accidental rather than intentional. The problem his barons had with the king was not that he sought to get the Sicilian throne for his son, but how he went about getting it". [48]

Failure and aftermath

The coronation of Charles of Anjou as King of Sicily in Rome (1266), illustration from the next century. KorunovaceKarlazAnjou.jpg
The coronation of Charles of Anjou as King of Sicily in Rome (1266), illustration from the next century.

In March 1261, Edmund ordered the Sicilians to make preparations for his arrival, but on 28 July 1263, Pope Urban IV (r. 1261–1264) formally rescinded the grant of Sicily and sent the archbishop of Cosenza to England to absolve Edmund and his father of the terms of the Sicilian concession. Instead, Urban sent Albert to the court of Louis IX to again offer the throne of Sicily to Charles. [49] The French prince was designated as King of Sicily and soon found himself beset by the same problems that had burdened Henry III, but he was eventually able to expel the Hohenstaufen. [50] In 1266, French forces defeated Manfred and subdued Conradin two years later, securing Charles' rule in Sicily. [51]

Legacy

Weiler argued that the impact of the "Sicilian business" on English history was "momentous", citing the contemporary baronial government' complaints about the wasteful nature of the project. [10] He claims that the ultimate failure of the ambitious plan was not the fault of Henry III, who had sought to expand Plantagenet influence in the face of a challenging political situation in Europe. [12] The historian David Carpenter, who specialises in the life and reign of Henry III, points to the "Sicilian business" as one of the key factors that inspired the revolution of 1258. [32] Runciman wrote that "The whole affair was chiefly important for its effect on the internal history of England; for it ushered in the Baron's War and the constitutional quarrels and developments that filled the latter part of King Henry III's reign". [52] In a retrospective analysis, Runciman reasoned that Edmund's installation as King of Sicily might have been possible if the English populace was willing to finance the project, and if the papacy was less brash about its financial demands. [52]

Notes

  1. ↑ The term "Normans" is in reference to the House of Hauteville, which conquered and settled the area that would become the Kingdom of Sicily with the assistance of a military force that was composed of, among other groups, Normans. [3]
  2. ↑ This was equivalent to £90,360. [1]
  3. ↑ Medieval England principally used silver pennies; larger sums of silver pennies were typically expressed in financial accounts as pounds (240 pennies) or marks (160 pennies). It is impossible to accurately estimate the modern equivalent value of 13th-century money; for comparison, in the early part of the thirteenth century, £66 was close to the average annual income of a poorer baron; £6,666 in 1216 was almost 25 per cent of the Crown's revenue for the year; shortly after Henry III's death, his son Edward I spent approximately £80,000 on his castle-building programme in North Wales, an immense outlay for the time. [45] [46] [47]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hohenstaufen</span> Medieval German royal and imperial dynasty

The Hohenstaufen dynasty, also known as the Staufer, was a noble family of unclear origin that rose to rule the Duchy of Swabia from 1079, and to royal rule in the Holy Roman Empire during the Middle Ages from 1138 until 1254. The dynasty's most prominent rulers – Frederick I (1155), Henry VI (1191) and Frederick II (1220) – ascended the imperial throne and also reigned over Italy and Burgundy. The non-contemporary name of 'Hohenstaufen' is derived from the family's Hohenstaufen Castle on Hohenstaufen mountain at the northern fringes of the Swabian Jura, near the town of Göppingen. Under Hohenstaufen rule, the Holy Roman Empire reached its greatest territorial extent from 1155 to 1268.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pope Clement IV</span> Head of the Catholic Church from 1265 to 1268

Pope Clement IV, born Gui Foucois and also known as Guy le Gros, was bishop of Le Puy (1257–1260), archbishop of Narbonne (1259–1261), cardinal of Sabina (1261–1265), and head of the Catholic Church from 5 February 1265 until his death. His election as pope occurred at a conclave held at Perugia that lasted four months while cardinals argued over whether to call in Charles I of Anjou, the youngest brother of Louis IX of France, to carry on the papal war against the Hohenstaufens. Pope Clement was a patron of Thomas Aquinas and of Roger Bacon, encouraging Bacon in the writing of his Opus Majus, which included important treatises on optics and the scientific method.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pope Urban IV</span> Head of the Catholic Church from 1261 to 1264

Pope Urban IV, born Jacques Pantaléon, was the head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 29 August 1261 to his death. He was elected pope without being a cardinal; he was the first to be elected in such a way, and this would occur for only 3 more popes afterwards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pope Innocent IV</span> Head of the Catholic Church from 1243 to 1254

Pope Innocent IV, born Sinibaldo Fieschi, was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 25 June 1243 to his death in 1254.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles I of Anjou</span> King of Sicily from 1266 to 1285

Charles I, commonly called Charles of Anjou or Charles d'Anjou, was a member of the royal Capetian dynasty and the founder of the second House of Anjou. He was Count of Provence (1246–1285) and Forcalquier in the Holy Roman Empire, Count of Anjou and Maine (1246–1285) in France; he was also King of Sicily (1266–1285) and Prince of Achaea (1278–1285). In 1272, he was proclaimed King of Albania, and in 1277 he purchased a claim to the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor</span> Holy Roman Emperor from 1220 to 1250

Frederick II was King of Sicily from 1198, King of Germany from 1212, King of Italy and Holy Roman Emperor from 1220 and King of Jerusalem from 1225. He was the son of Emperor Henry VI of the Hohenstaufen dynasty and Queen Constance of Sicily of the Hauteville dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conradin</span> Duke of Swabia, King of Jerusalem and King of Sicily (1252–1268)

Conrad III, called the Younger or the Boy, but usually known by the diminutive Conradin, was the last direct heir of the House of Hohenstaufen. He was Duke of Swabia (1254–1268) and nominal King of Jerusalem (1254–1268) and Sicily (1254–1258). After his attempt to reclaim the Kingdom of Sicily for the Hohenstaufen dynasty failed, he was captured and beheaded.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles II of Naples</span> King of Naples from 1284 to 1309

Charles II, also known as Charles the Lame, was King of Naples, Count of Provence and Forcalquier (1285–1309), Prince of Achaea (1285–1289), and Count of Anjou and Maine (1285–1290); he also was King of Albania (1285–1294), and claimed the Kingdom of Jerusalem from 1285. He was the son of Charles I of Anjou—one of the most powerful European monarchs in the second half of the 13th century—and Beatrice of Provence. His father granted Charles the Principality of Salerno in the Kingdom of Sicily in 1272 and made him regent in Provence and Forcalquier in 1279.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conrad IV of Germany</span> 13th century King of Germany

Conrad, a member of the Hohenstaufen dynasty, was the only son of Emperor Frederick II from his second marriage with Queen Isabella II of Jerusalem. He inherited the title of King of Jerusalem upon the death of his mother in childbed. Appointed Duke of Swabia in 1235, his father had him elected King of Germany and crowned King of Italy in 1237. After the emperor was deposed and died in 1250, he ruled as King of Sicily until his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manfred, King of Sicily</span> King of Sicily from 1258 to 1266

Manfred was the last King of Sicily from the Hohenstaufen dynasty, reigning from 1258 until his death. The natural son of the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II, Manfred became regent over the kingdom of Sicily on behalf of his nephew Conradin in 1254. As regent he subdued rebellions in the kingdom, until in 1258 he usurped Conradin's rule. After an initial attempt to appease Pope Innocent IV he took up the ongoing conflict between the Hohenstaufens and the papacy through combat and political alliances. He defeated the papal army at Foggia on 2 December 1254. Excommunicated by three successive popes, Manfred was the target of a Crusade (1255–66) called first by Pope Alexander IV and then by Urban IV. Nothing came of Alexander's call, but Urban enlisted the aid of Charles of Anjou in overthrowing Manfred. Manfred was killed during his defeat by Charles at the Battle of Benevento, and Charles assumed kingship of Sicily.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sicilian Vespers</span> 1282 rebellion in Sicily against King Charles Is rule

The Sicilian Vespers was a successful rebellion on the island of Sicily that broke out at Easter 1282 against the rule of the French-born king Charles I of Anjou, who had ruled the Kingdom of Sicily since 1266. The revolt came after twenty years of Angevin rule over Sicily, whose policies were deeply unpopular among the Sicilian populace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingdom of Sicily</span> State in southern Italy (1130–1816)

The Kingdom of Sicily was a state that existed in Sicily and the south of the Italian Peninsula plus, for a time, in Northern Africa from its founding by Roger II of Sicily in 1130 until 1816. It was a successor state of the County of Sicily, which had been founded in 1071 during the Norman conquest of the southern peninsula. The island was divided into three regions: Val di Mazara, Val Demone and Val di Noto.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Tagliacozzo</span> 1268 dynastic conflict in Italy

The Battle of Tagliacozzo was fought on 23 August 1268 between the Ghibelline supporters of Conradin of Hohenstaufen and the Guelph army of Charles of Anjou. The battle represented the last act of Hohenstaufen power in Italy. The capture and execution of Conradin several months after the battle also marked the fall of the family from the Imperial and Sicilian thrones, leading to the new chapter of Angevin domination in Southern Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War of the Sicilian Vespers</span> Conflicts between various European kingdoms (1282–1302)

The War of the Sicilian Vespers, also shortened to the War of the Vespers, was a conflict waged by several medieval European kingdoms over control of Sicily from 1282 to 1302. The war, which started with the revolt of the Sicilian Vespers, was fought over competing dynastic claims to the throne of Sicily and grew to involve the Crown of Aragon, Angevin Kingdom of Naples, Kingdom of France, and the papacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John of Procida</span>

John of Procida (1210–1298) was an Italian medieval physician and diplomat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elisabeth of Bavaria, Queen of Germany</span> Queen consort of Germany and Jerusalem

Elisabeth of Bavaria, a member of the House of Wittelsbach, was Queen of Germany and Jerusalem from 1246 to 1254 by her marriage to King Conrad IV of Germany.

The 1254 papal election took place following the death of Pope Innocent IV and ended with the choice of Raynaldus de' Conti, who took the name Pope Alexander IV. The election was held in Naples, in the former palazzo of Pietro della Vigna, and required only one day.

Swabian Sicily denotes the period in the history of Sicily during which it was ruled by the Hohenstaufen dynasty, lasting from Henry VI's's accession to the island's throne in 1194 until Manfred of Sicily's defeat by Charles I of Anjou in 1266. It has been particularly researched by German scholars such as Ernst Kantorowicz and Willy Cohn.

Crusades against Christians were Christian religious wars dating from the 11th century First Crusade when papal reformers began equating the universal church with the papacy. Later in the 12th century focus changed onto heretics and schismatics rather than infidels. Holy wars were fought in northern France, against King Roger II of Sicily, various heretics, their protectors, mercenary bands and the first political crusade against Markward of Anweiler. Full crusading apparatus was deployed against Christians in the conflict with the Cathar heretics of southern France and their Christian protectors in the 13th . This was given equivalence with the Eastern crusades and supported by developments such as the creation of the Papal States. The aims were to make the crusade indulgence available to the laity, the reconfiguration of Christian society, and ecclesiastical taxation.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lloyd 2008.
  2. 1 2 Abulafia 1988, p. 30.
  3. ↑ Abulafia 1988, p. 19.
  4. 1 2 Abulafia 1988, p. 12.
  5. ↑ Abulafia 1988, p. 13.
  6. ↑ Weiler 2012, pp. 122, 147.
  7. 1 2 Runciman 1958, p. 71.
  8. ↑ Weiler 2012, pp. 147–149.
  9. 1 2 Runciman 1958, p. 72.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Weiler 2006, p. 147.
  11. ↑ Abulafia 1988, pp. 406–407.
  12. 1 2 Weiler 2006, pp. 147–148.
  13. 1 2 Runciman 1958, pp. 72–73.
  14. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 148.
  15. ↑ Weiler 2006, pp. 148–149.
  16. ↑ Runciman 1958, p. 44.
  17. ↑ Runciman 1958, p. 45.
  18. ↑ Runciman 1958, pp. 45–46.
  19. ↑ Runciman 1958, pp. 48–49.
  20. 1 2 Runciman 1958, p. 74.
  21. 1 2 Runciman 1958, p. 73.
  22. ↑ Runciman 1958, pp. 73–74.
  23. ↑ Weiler 2012, p. 151.
  24. ↑ Carpenter 2004, p. 346.
  25. 1 2 Weiler 2006, p. 149.
  26. ↑ Weiler 2006, pp. 149–150.
  27. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 150.
  28. 1 2 3 Runciman 1958, p. 75.
  29. ↑ Runciman 1958, pp. 47–48.
  30. 1 2 3 Weiler 2006, p. 152.
  31. ↑ Weiler 2006, pp. 152–153.
  32. 1 2 3 4 5 Carpenter 2004, p. 347.
  33. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 154.
  34. ↑ Rhodes 1895, p. 27.
  35. 1 2 Weiler 2006, p. 155.
  36. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 169.
  37. ↑ Runciman 1958, pp. 48–50.
  38. 1 2 Runciman 1958, p. 76.
  39. ↑ Runciman 1958, pp. 76–77.
  40. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 159.
  41. ↑ Howell 2001, pp. 152–133.
  42. ↑ Prestwich 1997, p. 24.
  43. ↑ Weiler 2012, p. 152.
  44. 1 2 Jobson 2012, p. 13.
  45. ↑ Carpenter 2004, p. 40.
  46. ↑ Pounds 1994, pp. 147, 176.
  47. ↑ McGlynn 2013, p. 237.
  48. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 161.
  49. ↑ Housley 1982, p. 18.
  50. ↑ Weiler 2006, p. 157.
  51. ↑ Prestwich 1997, p. 67.
  52. 1 2 Runciman 1958, p. 79.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.