South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms

Last updated

The South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms (SACRRF) is a charter of rights drawn up by South African religious and civil organisations which is intended to define the religious freedoms, rights and responsibilities of South African citizens. The aim of the drafters of the charter is for it to be approved by Parliament in terms of section 234 of the Constitution of South Africa. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

The SACRRF details what the legal and civil manifestations of the right to freedom of religion would be for individuals, groups and official organisations in South Africa. It expresses what freedom of religion means to those of religious belief and religious organisations and the daily freedoms, rights and responsibilities associated with this right. These include the right to gather to observe religious belief, freedom of expression regarding religion, the right of citizens to make choices according to their convictions, the right to change their faith, the right to be educated in their religion, the right to educate their children in accordance with their philosophical and religious convictions and the right to refuse to perform certain duties or assist in activities that violate their religious beliefs. [1] [2] [4] [5]

Legislation

The right to freedom of religion is enshrined in the Constitution of South Africa. Chapter 2 of the Constitution of South Africa, containing the Bill of Rights, states that everyone has the right to freedom of religion, belief and opinion. Section 9, the equality clause, prohibits unfair discrimination on various grounds including religion. [6] Section 15 allows religious observances in state and state-aided institutions, provided they follow public authority rules, they are conducted on an equitable basis and attendance is free and voluntary, and also provides for the recognition of religious legal systems and marriages that are not inconsistent with the Constitution. [7] Section 31 protects the right of persons belonging to a religious community to practise their religion together with other members of that community and form voluntary religious associations. [8]

Various other provisions of the Constitution relate to religion and religious freedom. Sections 185 and 186 provide for a commission for the promotion and protection of the rights of cultural, religious and linguistic communities. [9] In addition, human rights such as the right to human dignity, the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of association relate indirectly to the protection of religious freedom. The right to freedom of expression does not extend to hate speech based on various grounds including religion. [10]

Section 234 of the Constitution makes allowance for charters of rights consistent with the Constitution to be adopted by Parliament. Section 234 states "In order to deepen the culture of democracy established by the Constitution, Parliament may adopt Charters of Rights consistent with the provisions of the Constitution". [3] The Service Charter for Victims of Crime in South Africa was approved by Parliament in accordance with this constitutional provision on 1 December 2004. [11] [12] [13]

Drafting of the charter

In 1990 Judge Albie Sachs, Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa from 1994 to 2009, wrote:

Ideally in South Africa, all religious organisations and persons concerned with the study of religion would get together and draft a charter of religious rights and responsibilities ... it would be up to the participants themselves to define what they consider to be their fundamental rights.

— Albie Sachs, Protecting human rights in a new South Africa [14]

The need to draft a charter that would make clear what freedom of religion entails for the people of South Africa, by the people of South Africa, was realised after conferences on the relationship between religion and the state and freedom of religion at the University of Stellenbosch in post-apartheid South Africa. [4] [15]

The charter was drafted over a period of several years by a group of academics, religious scholars, religious leaders, statutory commissioners and international legal experts in consultation with all major religious, human rights and media groups in South Africa. [2] [15] [16] [17]

The first draft of the charter was unveiled at a gathering of religious groups on 14 February 2008. [15] [18] Among those present were representatives of Christian denominations, African independent churches, those of Jewish and Islamic faith, the SA Tamil Federation and academic institutions and statutory bodies. The Continuation Committee was appointed by those present at this gathering to complete the process of finalising the charter. [15]

Amendments were made to the document by the Continuation Committee and it was developed through suggestions and input from the wide community of leaders and groups among which it was circulated prior to its public endorsement on 21 October 2010. [5] [15] [17]

The charter has been made available in six of South Africa's official languages, namely English, Afrikaans, isiXhosa, isiZulu, Sepedi and Tswana. [19] [20]

The members of the Continuation Committee per the final document, as amended on 6 August 2009 and 1 October 2009, were: P Coertzen (Chairperson), I Benson, S Boshoff, J Creer, D Erekson, Rabbi Greens, A Knoetze, C Landman, W Langeveldt, E Malherbe, N Mndende, A Sedick and K Thompson. [19]

Endorsement of the charter

The charter endorsement is worded as follows:

Through our signature we hereby endorse the proposed South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms as submitted to the conference of 21 October 2010. We see it as an important development and necessity for South Africa and hope to see it form part of our Constitutional framework through section 234 of the Constitution. [21]

The charter was first signed at a public endorsement ceremony in Johannesburg on 21 October 2010 in the presence of signatories and keynote speaker Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke and signatories continue to be added to the open document. [17] [22] [23]

Moseneke welcomed the initiative by civil society but did not voice a personal opinion about the charter or endorse it. [24] [25] In his keynote speech, Moseneke stated:

Most of the provisions of the charter may appear uncontroversial, and yet as a sitting justice of the Constitutional Court moments may present themselves when I may be duty-bound to proffer judicial opinion on the remit or impact of one or more of its provisions, if they were to be formally enacted, or if a justiciable dispute about its enactment should arise. I am thus honour-bound to keep an open mind on the constitutional appropriateness of its provisions.
...
Every right guaranteed in the Bill of Rights may be limited by a law of general application. Thus the right to religious freedom is not absolute.
Its scope may be limited by other rights or by a law in pursuit of a legitimate government purpose.
...
We have opted for a secular state which is enjoined to observe strict neutrality among religious tendencies. This duty indeed extends to the right not to believe or hold or observe any religion.
Where religious rights are at odds with other constitutional guarantees or a legitimate government purpose, the conflict must be weighed carefully, keeping in mind that in our constitutional democracy the constitution is supreme and there is no hierarchy of rights. All rank equally. We all have the right to be different.

— Dikgang Moseneke [26]

The charter has been endorsed by signatories from all major religions in South Africa and the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities. Signatories include representatives of religious groups and organisations, human rights organisations, legal and academic entities and media bodies. [4] [20]

By the first annual general meeting of the South African Council for the Protection and Promotion of Religious Rights and Freedoms in 2011, 67 religious organisations, including numerous Christian denominations representing approximately 8–10 million South Africans, had signed the charter. [27]

South African Council for the Protection and Promotion of Religious Rights and Freedoms

After the public endorsement of the charter, the South African Council for the Protection and Promotion of Religious Rights and Freedoms was established to oversee the process of the charter being formally enacted into South African law by Parliament. A steering committee convened by Prof Pieter Coertzen was also appointed to prepare a constitution for the council. [4] [20]

The members of the council, some of whom previously served on the Continuation Committee, are:[ citation needed ]

Specialists appointed to the steering committee are:[ citation needed ]

Criticism of the charter

The charter has been criticised by Pagan South Africans and non-religious South Africans.

Members of the South African Pagan Council expressed concern that the charter would be used to enforce religious discrimination in society, for example by providing the unlimited right to refuse service to South African citizens on the grounds of religious conscience, and would result in state-subsidized religious education in a secular state. [28] [29]

Jacques Rousseau of the Free Society Institute considers existing legislative protection of religious beliefs to be clear and adequate and expressed concern about the charter allowing discrimination against the non-religious and containing undue limitation on freedom of speech over and above the hate speech clause in the Constitution. Rossouw also expressed concern about vague wording open to interpretation in a document intended to provide clarity about constitutional rights. [30] [31]

According to the Freedom from Religion South Africa action group, an association of freethinkers, atheists, sceptics and agnostics committed to a secular state, the charter would undermine secularity, democracy and freedom in South Africa. The group is concerned that, instead of advancing freedom of religion, the charter would advance religion and inhibit the religious freedom of those in minority religions and the non-religious. The group is concerned that the charter seeks to entrench religion in educational and state institutions using state powers and state funds. [32] The group has drafted and proposed its own South African Charter of the Freedom from Religion in opposition to the charter. [33]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Court of South Africa</span> Supreme court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is the supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction.

Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") is the section of the Constitution of Canada that lists what the Charter calls "fundamental freedoms" theoretically applying to everyone in Canada, regardless of whether they are a Canadian citizen, or an individual or corporation. These freedoms can be held against actions of all levels of government and are enforceable by the courts. The fundamental freedoms are freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of thought, freedom of belief, freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association.

Chapter Two of the Constitution of South Africa contains the Bill of Rights, a human rights charter that protects the civil, political and socio-economic rights of all people in South Africa. The rights in the Bill apply to all law, including the common law, and bind all branches of the government, including the national executive, Parliament, the judiciary, provincial governments, and municipal councils. Some provisions, such as those prohibiting unfair discrimination, also apply to the actions of private persons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Religion in South Africa</span>

Religion in South Africa is dominated by various branches of Christianity, which collectively represent around 85% of the country's total population.

The University of Pretoria Faculty of Law was established in 1908. It consists of six academic departments, six centres, two law clinics and the Pretoria University Law Press (PULP). This faculty has Departments of Jurisprudence, Mercantile Law, Private Law, Procedural Law, Public Law and Centre for Human Rights. The faculty offers the undergraduate LLB degree, and postgraduate LLM/MPhil and LLD/PhD degrees. 

Thembile Lewis Skweyiya was a South African lawyer and judge who served on the Constitutional Court of South Africa between February 2004 and May 2014. He rose to prominence as a civil rights lawyer during apartheid and he served three years in the KwaZulu-Natal High Court before his elevation to the Constitutional Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dikgang Moseneke</span> South African judge

Dikgang Ernest Moseneke OLG is a South African jurist and former Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa.

Iain Tyrrell Benson is a legal philosopher and practising legal consultant. The main focus of his work in relation to law and society has been to examine some of the various meanings that underlie terms of common but confused usage. His work towards an understanding of secular and secularism has been cited by the Supreme Court of Canada and the Constitutional Court of South Africa. He has also given critical study to the terms pluralism, faith, believer, unbeliever, liberalism and accommodation and examined the implications for various legal and non-legal usages.

The Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa is a judge in the Constitutional Court of South Africa and the second-highest judicial post in the Republic of South Africa, after the Chief Justice. The post, originally called "Deputy President of the Constitutional Court", was created in September 1995 by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Second Amendment Act, 1995, which was an amendment to the Interim Constitution. The position was retained by the final Constitution which came into force in February 1997. In November 2001 the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of South Africa restructured the judiciary, and the post was renamed to "Deputy Chief Justice".

<i>Daniels v Campbell</i> South African legal case

Daniels v Campbell NO and Others, an important case in South African family law and law of succession, was heard in the Constitutional Court on 6 November 2003 and decided on 11 March 2004. The court was unanimous that the constitutional right to equality requires that rights of intestate inheritance and maintenance must be extended to the surviving partners of de facto monogamous Muslim marriages, even though such marriages are not recognised under the Marriage Act, 1961.

Sisi Virginia Khampepe is a retired South African judge who served in the Constitutional Court of South Africa between October 2009 and October 2021. Formerly a prominent labour lawyer, she joined the bench in December 2000 as a judge of the Transvaal Provincial Division. She was also a member of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neopaganism in South Africa</span>

Neopaganism in South Africa is primarily represented by the traditions of Wicca, Neopagan witchcraft, Germanic neopaganism and Neo-Druidism. The movement is related to comparable trends in the United States and Western Europe and is mostly practiced by White South Africans of urban background; it is to be distinguished from folk healing and mythology in local Bantu culture.

The Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities is an independent chapter nine institution in South Africa. It draws its mandate from the South African Constitution by way of the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities Act of 2002.

South Africa is a secular state, with freedom of religion enshrined in the Constitution.

AfriForum is a South African non-governmental organisation which mainly focuses on the interests of Afrikaners, a subgroup of the country's white population. AfriForum has been described as a "white nationalist, alt-right, and Afrikaner nationalist group", though this description is rejected by the organisation's leadership, who refer to themselves as a civil rights group.

Freedom of Religion South Africa is a South African nonprofit fundamentalist Christian advocacy group. It was founded in 2014 by Andrew Selley, the lead pastor and founder of the Joshua Generation Church, after parents filed a complaint to the South African Human Rights Commission that alleged that Joshua Generation Church advocated for corporal punishment in the home. In Freedom of Religion South Africa v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, FOR SA unsuccessfully opposed a ruling by the Johannesburg High Court that deemed corporal punishment to be assault.

<i>Ramakatsa v Magashule</i> South African legal case

Ramakatsa and Others v Magashule and Others is a 2012 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on the internal governance of political parties and the section 19 right to participate in political party activities. The court reviewed and overturned an internal elective conference held by the African National Congress (ANC) in Parys, Free State in June 2012. This had the effect of invalidating the election of the Free State ANC's provincial leadership, including the election of Ace Magashule as ANC Provincial Chairperson.

<i>Laugh It Off Promotions v South African Breweries</i> South African legal case

Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) BV t/a Sabmark International and Another is a landmark decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on the intersection between freedom of expression and trademark law. The case concerned the proper interpretation of anti-trademark dilution provisions of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993 in the context of the sale of T-shirts parodying established commercial brands. The court's unanimous judgment, delivered on 27 May 2005, was written by Justice Dikgang Moseneke.

<i>Khumalo v Holomisa</i> South African legal case

Khumalo and Others v Holomisa is a landmark decision in the South African law of delict. It was decided by the Constitutional Court of South Africa on 21 May 2002. Handing down judgment for a unanimous court, Justice Kate O'Regan held that the existing common law of defamation is consistent with the Bill of Rights. The case emanated from a challenge by members of the press, who argued, in the main, that falsity should be an element of the delict of defamation in suits brought by public officials. However, the court rejected this argument, finding that existing common law does not impose an undue limitation on freedom of expression.

<i>Minister of Finance v Van Heerden</i> South African legal case

Minister of Finance and Another v Van Heerden is a landmark decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on the constitutionality of affirmative action. Delivered in July 2004, it marked the court's first application of the affirmative action clause in section 9(2) of the Bill of Rights. In a majority judgment written by Justice Dikgang Moseneke, the court held that section 9(2) precludes claims of unfair discrimination against any affirmative action measures pursued in conformance with that provision.

References

  1. 1 2 Malherbe, Erasmus. "The Background and Contents of the Proposed South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms" (PDF). iclrs.org. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  2. 1 2 3 Benson, Iain T (22 August 2011). "South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms". IJRF: International Institute for Religious Freedom. 4 (1). iirf.eu: 125–134. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  3. 1 2 "Constitution of South Africa: Section 234: Charter of Rights". info.gov.za. Archived from the original on 26 September 2009. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  4. 1 2 3 4 de Villiers, Johannes (13 November 2010). "Handves opgestel vir godsdiensregte" (in Afrikaans). rapport.co.za. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  5. 1 2 Jackson, Neels (30 November 2010). "Talle regte, talle gelowe". Beeld (in Afrikaans). Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  6. ↑ "Constitution of South Africa: Bill of Rights: Section 9: Equality". info.gov.za. Archived from the original on 17 November 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  7. ↑ "Constitution of South Africa: Bill of Rights: Section 15: Freedom of Religion, Belief & Opinion". info.gov.za. Archived from the original on 17 November 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  8. ↑ "Constitution of South Africa: Bill of Rights: Section 31: Cultural, Linguistic and Religious Communities". info.gov.za. Archived from the original on 17 November 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  9. ↑ "Constitution of South Africa: Chapter 9: Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities". info.gov.za. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  10. ↑ "Constitution of South Africa: Bill of Rights: Section 16: Freedom of expression". info.gov.za. Archived from the original on 17 November 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  11. ↑ "Press Statement: Cabinet Approves the South African Service Charter for Victims of Crime". justice.gov.za. 2 December 2004. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  12. ↑ Govender, Sholain (28 November 2007). "Giving power to victims of crime". southafrica.info. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  13. ↑ "The Service Charter for Victims of Crime in South Africa". justice.gov.za. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  14. ↑ Albie Sachs (1990). Protecting human rights in a new South Africa (Contemporary South African Debates Series). Cape Town: Oxford University Press. pp. 46–47. ISBN   9780195706093.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Coertzen, Pieter (16 October 2009). "South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms, How it Came About". academic.sun.ac.za. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  16. ↑ Jackson, Neels (4 November 2008). "NG Kerk werk aan handves oor regte". Beeld (in Afrikaans). Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  17. 1 2 3 Israelsen-Hartley, Sara (27 October 2010). "South African charter spells out specific religious freedoms". Deseret News. Archived from the original on 14 October 2010. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  18. ↑ Jackson, Neels (13 February 2008). "Handves bekyk deur kerke". Beeld (in Afrikaans). Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  19. 1 2 "Proposed Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms" (PDF). fsi.org.za. 1 October 2009. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  20. 1 2 3 Coertzen, Pieter (27 October 2010). "South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms, Feedback: Endorsement Ceremony" (PDF). academic.sun.ac.za. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  21. ↑ "South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms Public, Endorsement Ceremony: Endorsement Formula". academic.sun.ac.za. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  22. ↑ "South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms, Public Endorsement Ceremony: Programme". academic.sun.ac.za. Retrieved 16 November 2012.
  23. ↑ Benson, Iain T (October 2011). "Expanding Constitutional "Dialogue": A Lesson from South Africa". cba.org. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
  24. ↑ du Preez, Melissa (21 October 2010). "Deputy Chief Justice welcomes initiative". jacarandafm.com. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  25. ↑ "African cultures still neglected". City Press. South Africa. 21 October 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  26. ↑ Moseneke, Dikgang (24 October 2010). "The right to differ religiously". The Sunday Independent. Archived from the original on 11 June 2014.
  27. ↑ "Council for the Protection and Promotion of Religious Freedom makes impact". bucer.de. 22 November 2011. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  28. ↑ Martin, Luke (15 April 2010). "Charter – Freedoms and Rights". pagancouncil.co.za. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  29. ↑ Leff, Damon (14 November 2010). "Charter of Religious Rights". pagancouncil.co.za. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  30. ↑ Rousseau, Jacques (8 November 2010). "South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms". fsi.org.za. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  31. ↑ Rousseau, Jacques (5 February 2012). "Staring into the abyss of 'special privileges'". Daily Maverick. South Africa. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
  32. ↑ "Open Letter". sekuler.org. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
  33. ↑ "Our Charter". sekuler.org. Retrieved 18 November 2012.

[1]

  1. ↑ Iain T. Benson, Religious Interfaith Work in Canada and South Africa with Particular Focus on the South African Charter of Religious Rights and Freedoms, http://www.hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/view/1319/3713
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.