States and Power in Africa

Last updated

States and Power in Africa
States and Power in Africa Cover.png
Author Jeffrey Herbst
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject State-building, Postcolonialism, Environmental determinism, Comparative politics, International relations,
Published2000 (Princeton University Press)
Media typeHardcover, Paperback
Pages280 pages (paperback)
ISBN 0-691-01028-5 (paperback)
LC Class JQ1875.H47 2000

States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control is a book on African state-building by Jeffrey Herbst, former Professor of Politics and International Affairs at the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs. The book was a co-winner of the 2001 Gregory Luebbert Book Award from the American Political Science Association in comparative politics. [1] It was also a finalist for the 2001 Herskovits Prize awarded by the African Studies Association. [2]

Contents

This book attempts to explain the lack of robust institutions and the prevalence of state failure in Africa. The work is heavily influenced by the scholarship of Charles Tilly and Max Weber. Both writers emphasize the role of war in the consolidation of state power over well-defined territories. [3]

Overview

At the time of writing, Herbst argued that the political science literature had largely ignored the African state-building experience and focused instead on state creation in Western Europe. His book is an attempt to understand the long run processes of state-building in Africa.

In Europe, social scientists such as Charles Tilly have argued that European states consolidated power to survive in an anarchic international system during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Faced with the constant threat of war, European political elites sent administrators and armed forces from the urban centers into rural hinterlands to raise taxes, recruit soldiers, and fortify buffer zones. Elites reduced the role of rural authorities and favored direct political rule. [4] European states consequently developed strong political and economic linkages between cities and surrounding territories.

Herbst emphasizes that the international pressures for war-making that existed in medieval Europe never existed in many parts of Africa. The European state-building experience was unusual and exceptional because it occurred under systemic geographic pressures that favored state consolidation – namely, scarcity of land and high-population densities. By contrast, Herbst argues, Africa has for most of its history been a relatively sparsely populated continent. Precolonial African states never faced survival imperatives for the projection of state power over rural terrain. [5]

During colonialism or after independence, moreover, European colonial powers had little incentive to develop state institutions to protect their colonies against invasion, having divided up Africa at the Berlin Conference. The colonizers instead focused on plundering natural resources through exploitation colonialism. The international state system enforced colonial boundaries of African states following independence, eroding any possible survival mandate. [6]

Herbst argues that African states have therefore survived without developing the robust and responsive physical, economic, and political infrastructure of modern European states. [7]

Herbst underscores that theorizing African state-building is necessary for a nuanced understanding of international relations because states in many other regions, including Central America, South America, and Southeast Asia face the same challenges that African states confront when controlling and policing their territories. [8]

Synopsis

Influence of geography on pre-colonial African states

Herbst argues that geographic features influenced how precolonial African states conceived of meaningful power. [9]

States did not seek to exert total control over strictly delineated territory. Herbst writes, "To equate states with firm territorial control is to misread even much of Europe's own history." [10] Rather, in precolonial Africa and medieval Europe, multiple powers extracted tribute and resources from the same territory. Villages appeased the multiple powers that could launch attacks against them by offering treasure and tribute, often in the form of slaves. [11]

Geographic features encouraged this shared distribution of power. African farmers relied on rain-fed agriculture and consequently invested little in particular pieces of land. [12] Because land was sparsely populated, African farmers could easily flee rulers rather than fight. Establishing absolute control over particular pieces of land was prohibitively costly and consequently a low priority for African elites. [13]

Varied and harsh terrain made it difficult for precolonial leaders to continuously exert power from political centers to the hinterlands. Some empires, like the Ashanti Empire, successfully projected power over large distances by building roads. [14] The largest precolonial polities arose in the Sudanian Savanna belt of West Africa because the horses and camels could transport armies over the terrain. In other areas, no centralized political organizations existed above the village level. [15]

Because polities did not pretend to control areas that they could not physically reach, shared sovereignty became the norm in precolonial Africa. International and domestic affairs were then less differentiated than in the modern Peace of Westphalia state system. [16]

Publication

States and Power in Africa was first published in 2000 by Princeton University Press. [17] It is part of the Princeton Studies in International History and Politics book series, edited by John Ikenberry, Marc Trachtenberg, and William Wohlforth. [18] Princeton University Press released a second paperback edition with a new preface written by Herbst in 2014. A new hardcover edition was released in 2015. [19]

Academic reception

States and Power in Africa was a co-winner of the 2001 Gregory Luebbert Book Award from the American Political Science Association in comparative politics. [20] It was also a finalist for the 2001 Herskovits Prize awarded by the African Studies Association. [21]

In a 2002 book review for the Journal of Economic Literature , James A. Robinson called the book "a bold, historically informed theoretical analysis, essential reading for economists interested in comparative institutions and development". [22] Robinson offers several critiques of the book. He questions that low population densities stalled modern institutional development in Africa, arguing that states with higher precolonial population densities were worse off after colonialism on average. [23] He also contests Herbst's conclusion that modern powers should allow the disintegration of the African states to promote experimentation with new forms of sovereignty. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colonialism</span> Creation and maintenance of colonies by people from another area

Colonialism is a practice by which a one group of people, social construct, or nation state controls, directs, or imposes taxes or tribute on other people or areas, often by establishing colonies, generally for strategic and economic advancement of the colonizing group or construct. There is no clear definition of colonialism; definitions may vary depending on the use and context.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental determinism</span> Theory that a societys development is predetermined by its physical environment

Environmental determinism is the study of how the physical environment predisposes societies and states towards particular economic or social developmental trajectories. Jared Diamond, Jeffrey Herbst, Ian Morris, and other social scientists sparked a revival of the theory during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. This "neo-environmental determinism" school of thought examines how geographic and ecological forces influence state-building, economic development, and institutions. While archaic versions of the geographic interpretation were used to encourage colonialism and eurocentrism, modern figures like Diamond use this approach to reject the racism in these explanations. Diamond argues that European powers were able to colonize due to unique advantages bestowed by their environment as opposed to any kind of inherent superiority.

Neocolonialism is the continuation or reimposition of imperialist rule by a state over another nominally independent state. Neocolonialism takes the form of economic imperialism, globalization, cultural imperialism and conditional aid to influence or control a developing country instead of the previous colonial methods of direct military control or indirect political control (hegemony).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democratization</span> A society becoming more democratic

Democratization, or democratisation, is the democratic transition to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction.

International political economy (IPE) is the study of how politics shapes the global economy and how the global economy shapes politics. A key focus in IPE is on the distributive consequences of global economic exchange. It has been described as the study of "the political battle between the winners and losers of global economic exchange."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrington Moore Jr.</span> American sociologist (1913–2005)

Barrington Moore Jr. was an American political sociologist, and the son of forester Barrington Moore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theda Skocpol</span> American sociologist and political scientist (born 1947)

Theda Skocpol is an American sociologist and political scientist, who is currently the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. She is best known as an advocate of the historical-institutional and comparative approaches, as well as her "state autonomy theory". She has written widely for both popular and academic audiences. She has been President of the American Political Science Association and the Social Science History Association.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State-building</span> Term in social sciences and humanities

State-building as a specific term in social sciences and humanities, refers to political and historical processes of creation, institutional consolidation, stabilization and sustainable development of states, from the earliest emergence of statehood up to the modern times. Within historical and political sciences, there are several theoretical approaches to complex questions related to the role of various contributing factors in state-building processes.

Frederick Cooper is an American historian who specializes in colonialization, decolonialization, and African history. After finishing his BA at Stanford University in 1969, Cooper received his Doctor of Philosophy from Yale University in 1974. From 1974 to 1982 he was Assistant, then Associate Professor at Harvard University. Becoming Professor of History at the University of Michigan in 1982, he left for a professorship of history at New York University where he has worked since 2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Analysis of Western European colonialism and colonization</span>

European colonialism and colonization is the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over other societies and territories, founding a colony, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically. For example, colonial policies, such as the type of rule implemented, the nature of investments, and identity of the colonizers, are cited as impacting postcolonial states. Examination of the state-building process, economic development, and cultural norms and mores shows the direct and indirect consequences of colonialism on the postcolonial states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Divergence</span> Period/event in European history

The Great Divergence or European miracle is the socioeconomic shift in which the Western world overcame pre-modern growth constraints and emerged during the 19th century as the most powerful and wealthy world civilizations, eclipsing previously dominant or comparable civilizations from the Middle East and Asia such as the Ottoman Empire, Mughal India, Safavid Iran, Qing China and Tokugawa Japan, among others.

Simon E. Gikandi is a Kenyan Literature Professor and Postcolonial scholar. He is the Class of 1943 University Professor of English at Princeton University. He is perhaps best known for his co-editorship of The Cambridge History of African and Caribbean Literature. He has also done important work on the modern African novel, and two distinguished African novelists: Chinua Achebe and Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. In 2019 he became the president of the Modern Language Association.

Jeffrey I. Herbst is an American political scientist, specializing in comparative politics, and in July 2018 became the president of the American Jewish University in Los Angeles, California. Herbst was previously the 16th president of Colgate University, and president and CEO of the Newseum in Washington, D.C. He resigned from his post at the Newseum in 2017 as the museum announced financial issues. Prior to assuming the presidency of Colgate in 2010, he was provost, executive vice president for academic affairs, and professor of political science at Miami University. He received his B.A. from Princeton University in 1983, M.A., MPhil from Yale University in 1985, and Ph.D. in 1987 also from Yale. He is married to Sharon Polansky, with whom he has three children, Matthew, Spencer, and Alana.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mahmood Mamdani</span> Ugandan academic (born 1946)

Mahmood Mamdani, FBA is an Indian-born Ugandan academic, author, and political commentator. He currently serves as the Chancellor of Kampala International University, Uganda. He was the director of the Makerere Institute of Social Research (MISR) from 2010 until February 2022, the Herbert Lehman Professor of Government at the School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University and the Professor of Anthropology, Political Science and African Studies at Columbia University.

<i>Why Nations Fail</i> 2012 book by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson

Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, first published in 2012, is a book by economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson. The book applies insights from institutional economics, development economics and economic history to understand why nations develop differently, with some succeeding in the accumulation of power and prosperity and others failing, via a wide range of historical case studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State formation</span> Development of a central political authority

State formation is the process of the development of a centralized government structure in a situation in which one did not exist. State formation has been a study of many disciplines of the social sciences for a number of years, so much so that Jonathan Haas writes, "One of the favorite pastimes of social scientists over the course of the past century has been to theorize about the evolution of the world's great civilizations."

Wealth in people is a concept developed by anthropologists and historians to describe social systems in which status, power, and influence are achieved and mediated through the number of one's dependents, followers, or other social ties and affiliations. The dependent's labor generates material wealth, which is in turn used to attach further dependents. Such systems can therefore exist independent of or alongside other capitalist or monetary modes of value and accumulation. The concept is most commonly applied to ethnographies and histories of Africa, particularly the tropical equatorial regions.

George Steinmetz is the Charles Tilly Collegiate Professor of Sociology and Germanic Languages and Literatures at the University of Michigan. He has taught at the New School for Social Research, the University of Chicago, and the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences. He is a historical sociologist of empires, states, and cities, with a focus on modern Germany, France, and Britain and their colonies. His other main areas of research are social theory and the history and philosophy of the social sciences.

Critical juncture theory focuses on critical junctures, i.e., large, rapid, discontinuous changes, and the long-term causal effect or historical legacy of these changes. Critical junctures are turning points that alter the course of evolution of some entity. Critical juncture theory seeks to explain both (1) the historical origin and maintenance of social order, and (2) the occurrence of social change through sudden, big leaps.

David Stasavage is an American political scientist.

References

  1. ↑ "Herbst, J.: States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. (Second Edition) (eBook, Paperback and Hardcover)". press.princeton.edu. Princeton University Press. Retrieved April 18, 2016.
  2. ↑ Jones, Loree. "FYI: (US) ASA Herskovits Award Finalists". h-net.msu.edu. Humanities and Social Science Online Logs. Retrieved April 18, 2016.
  3. ↑ Robinson, James (June 2002). "States and Power in Africa: By Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay". Journal of Economic Literature. 40 (2): 510–19. doi:10.1257/002205102320161357.
  4. ↑ Tilly, Charles (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, A.D. 990-1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. p. 63.
  5. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 14–15. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  6. ↑ Robinson, James (June 2002). "States and Power in Africa: By Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay". Journal of Economic Literature. 40 (2): 510–19. doi:10.1257/002205102320161357.
  7. ↑ Robinson, James (June 2002). "States and Power in Africa: By Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay". Journal of Economic Literature. 40 (2): 510–19. doi:10.1257/002205102320161357.
  8. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 22. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  9. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 51. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  10. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 37. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  11. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 46. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  12. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 38. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  13. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 41. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  14. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 41. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  15. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 49. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  16. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 55. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  17. ↑ Herbst, Jeffry (2000). States and Power in Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   0-691-01027-7.
  18. ↑ "Browse Princeton Catalog in Princeton-Studies-in-International-History-and-Politics". press.princeton.edu. Princeton University Press. Retrieved April 18, 2016.
  19. ↑ "Herbst, J.: States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control". States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton University Press. Retrieved April 18, 2016.
  20. ↑ "Herbst, J.: States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. (Second Edition) (eBook, Paperback and Hardcover)". press.princeton.edu. Princeton University Press. Retrieved April 18, 2016.
  21. ↑ Jones, Loree. "FYI: (US) ASA Herskovits Award Finalists". h-net.msu.edu. Humanities and Social Science Online Logs. Retrieved April 18, 2016.
  22. ↑ Robinson, James (June 2002). "States and Power in Africa: By Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay". Journal of Economic Literature. 40 (2): 510–19. doi:10.1257/002205102320161357.
  23. ↑ Robinson, James (June 2002). "States and Power in Africa: By Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay". Journal of Economic Literature. 40 (2): 514. doi:10.1257/002205102320161357.
  24. ↑ Robinson, James (June 2002). "States and Power in Africa: By Jeffrey I. Herbst: A Review Essay". Journal of Economic Literature. 40 (2): 518. doi:10.1257/002205102320161357.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.