Sustainable Groundwater Management Act

Last updated

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) is a three-bill package that passed the California state legislature and was signed into California state law by Governor Jerry Brown in September 2014. Its purpose is to ensure better local and regional management of groundwater use and it seeks to have a sustainable groundwater management in California by 2042. It emphasizes local management and formed groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) from local and regional authorities [1] who submitted groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) to the state between 2020 and 2022. [2]

Contents

Background

Groundwater diagram in relation to the hydrologic and hydro-social cycle Groundwaterimage.jpg
Groundwater diagram in relation to the hydrologic and hydro-social cycle

Groundwater in California is used by 85% of California's population of 40 million and heavily used by the agriculture industry as the main water source for crops. [3] Prior to SGMA, groundwater use was under-regulated to a point where many areas of the state faced major depletion, particularly in the San Joaquin Valley and other groundwater basins on the central coast and southern California that have been designated by the State's Department of Water Resources (DWR) as being critically overdrafted. [4]

Groundwater is particularly crucial in California because the dearth of surface water in summer months in most of the state means that it supplies between one-third and two-thirds of the state's freshwater supply, depending on climatic conditions. It has been pumped in excess of the natural rate of replenishment, which in return is lowering the groundwater table, a phenomenon called "overdraft", that can cause severe land subsidence. [5]

In 1980, DWR noted that of California's 450 groundwater basins that were defined at the time, 40 were in overdraft and 11 were identified as being in "critically overdrafted conditions" (COD). [3] Groundwater levels had dropped from 50 feet below historic levels and up to 100 feet below in the San Joaquin Valley. In 2016, DWR identified an additional 10 basins as being in COD status for a total of 21 COD basins. [6] These COD basins are required to reach sustainability in a shorter timeframe, by 2040 rather than 2042 under SGMA.

Knowing how much groundwater is being taken out and used is difficult because there is no reporting requirement. Prior to SGMA there were only a few basins that reported to the state, operating under government regulation and special state legislation. SGMA mandates annual reporting of groundwater pumped in all high and medium priority basins.

Managing groundwater is also challenging because it does not adhere to property lines and often moves freely underground across jurisdictions. SGMA's requirement that GSAs are established and that GSAs and GSPs be coordinated across a basin or subbasin seeks to address this problem. Further, SGMA requires that neighboring basins consider each other's ability to achieve their sustainability goal.

Legislation

The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) consists of three bills. It was primarily authored by California State Assembly member Roger Dickinson (AB 1739) and State Senator Fran Pavley (SB 1319 and SB 1168). [1]

AB 1739

AB 1739 gives the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) or a groundwater sustainability agency (GSA) the authority to establish fees (detailed in SB 1168) and offer support to "entities that extract or use groundwater to promote water conservation and protect groundwater resources". GSAs are locally controlled organizations in California's high- and medium-priority groundwater basins and are responsible for preparing a groundwater sustainability plan (GSP), implementing SGMA, and coordinating with neighbors. [7]

AB 1739 also requires DWR to organize and publish an online report with estimates of groundwater replenishment and best practices. GSAs are required to submit a groundwater sustainability plan (GSP) to the DWR for review. DWR must determine regulations to evaluate, implement, and coordinate GSPs based on conditions of "hydrology, water demand, regulatory restrictions that affect the availability of surface water, and unreliability of, or reductions in, surface water deliveries to the agency or water users in the basin, and impact of those conditions on achieving sustainability and shall include the historic average reliability and deliveries of surface water to the agency or water users in the basin". [8]

SB 1319

Approved by Governor Jerry Brown on September 16, 2014, Senator Pavley's SB 1319 authorized local agencies to implement a groundwater plan. Management of groundwater prior to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act was unregulated and voluntary for the various agencies using groundwater ranging from special districts under authority granted from the state, city, and county ordinances and court adjudicated basins. Senate bill 1319 requires for the groundwater management plans to follow specific and include components that the state deems as sustainable for the specific groundwater basin and aligns with the SGMA timeline. If an agency was seeking funds from the Department of Water Resources for a project regarding groundwater or groundwater quality, they too have to abide to specific requirements such as preparing and implementing a groundwater management plan. [9] Managing groundwater is a challenging task, one that has been addressed by the SGMA. Groundwater is out of sight which makes it difficult to monitor, especially when the groundwater basins boundaries reach across multiple agencies and users. Pumping unregulated and mismanaged groundwater can lead to a "tragedy of the commons", with each user maximizing the resource for their own gain with little responsibility for the depleting aquifer. The SGMA initially set basin boundaries based on a 2003 Department of Water Resources report, Bulletin 118-03. [10] The report delineated 431 groundwater basins statewide. Of these basins, 24 were subdivided into 108 subbasins to total 515 basins and subbasins in all. The report based these boundaries off the alluvial sediments found using various geologic maps. [11] Groundwater is difficult to manage as it is not neatly aligned with the jurisdiction of these set basin boundaries. The SGMA calls for the GSAs to communicate and work with the overlapping groundwater uses and allow for a governance of the basin through different means. These can include a memorandum of agreement between the multiple parties or through a legal joint agreement. By these agreements the groundwater basin can be regulated by multiple GSAs or just by one agency.

SB 1168

The California Constitution and SB 1168 require that any use of the groundwater be both reasonable and beneficial. [12] California has a history of complex water rights, in which the Reasonable and Beneficial Use Doctrine is a key tenet. The doctrine was originally developed for riparian landowners and surface water management, but SB 1168 applied it to the context of groundwater and the SGMA, stating that any use of groundwater has to be sustainably managed for long-term reliability and multiple economic, social, and environmental benefits for future uses. [12]

Specifically, SB 1168 gives GSAs the authority to:

It requires the Department of Water Resources to:

An Electronic "Barologger" data-logger is being used to measure the depth to groundwater in this well. This is one form of groundwater monitoring that SB 1168 requires extraction facilities to implement regularly. Groundwater monitoring, Coronado National Memorial (6540935393).jpg
An Electronic "Barologger" data-logger is being used to measure the depth to groundwater in this well. This is one form of groundwater monitoring that SB 1168 requires extraction facilities to implement regularly.

SB 13 amendments

Since the collection of bills that make up SGMA were complex, some minor changes were made in SB 13 pertaining to GSA formation. Prior to SB 13, existing law required that each high- and medium-priority groundwater basins be managed after implementing a groundwater sustainability plan and subjected reporting requirements to the State Water Resources Control Board. SB 13 changed DWR's role with respect to reviewing, posting, and tracking GSA formation notices. Changes include notifying reviews, GSA boundaries which overlap, and service area boundaries. [13]

Bill overview

Key definitions

Key terms in the SGMA are defined as follows: [14]

Groundwater sustainability agencies

A GSA is a local agency that implements the SGMA as the primary entity responsible for reaching groundwater sustainability. [15] It is required to develop and implement a groundwater sustainability plan (GSP) to consider the interests of all of its stakeholders.

Any local agency or combinations thereof may form a GSA for the basin in which they overlap. A "local agency" refers to a local public agency that has water supply, management, and land use obligations within the groundwater basin. The SGMA determined 43 high-priority groundwater basins and 84 medium-priority groundwater basins, totaling 127 basins accounting for 96% of California's groundwater. These basins must adopt GSPs by 2020 or 2022 (depending on the basin) and have until 2040 or 2042 to attain sustainability. A local agency can decide not to form a GSA and submit an alternative proposal to DWR if they believe the alternative will meet the objectives and long-term goals of the SGMA. The DWR is required to assess the alternative proposal to see if it satisfies the objectives and goals of the SGMA. If it does not, the local agency is required to form a GSA and develop a GSP. [16] The SGMA required GSAs to be formed by June 30, 2017.

Implementation deadlines

WhenWhoWhat
January 31, 2015Department of Water Resources (DWR)Categorize and prioritize basins as high, medium, low, or very low.
January 1, 2016DWRAdopt regulations for basin boundary adjustments and accept adjustment requests from local agencies.
April 1, 2016Local water agencies or watermasters in adjudicated areasSubmit final judgment /order / decree and required report to DWR (report annually thereafter).
June 1, 2016DWRAdopt regulations for evaluating adequacy of Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs) and Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) coordination agreements
December 31, 2016DWRPublish report estimating water available for groundwater replenishment
January 1, 2017DWRPublish groundwater sustainability best management practices
By June 30, 2017Local agenciesEstablish GSAs
After July 1, 2017 State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)Designate basins as probationary where GSAs have not been formed
After July 1, 2017Groundwater users in probationary basinsAdopt GSPs and begin managing basins under GSPs
January 31, 2020GSAs in other medium- and high- priority basinsFile annual groundwater extraction report with SWRCB by December 15 each year
After January 31, 2022SWRCBDesignate basins as probationary where GSPs have not been adopted in other medium- and high-priority basins
After January 31, 2025SWRCBDesignate basins as probationary where GSPs are inadequate or not being implemented, and extractions result in significant depletions of interconnected surface waters
After January 31, 2040GSAs (in medium- and high-priority basins in critical overdraft)Achieve groundwater sustainability goals (DWR may grant two five-year extensions upon a showing of good cause)
After January 31, 2042GSAs (in other medium- and high-priority basins)Achieve groundwater sustainability goals (DWR may grant two five-year extensions upon a showing of good cause) [17]

As part of its implementation, DWR has developed a Strategic Plan to document its Sustainable Groundwater Management (SGM) Program, which expands on its responsibilities in SGMA. The Strategic Plan describes the state's groundwater conditions, identifies legislation, policies, and success factors, describes the goals and objectives of DWR actions, and presents the plan for DWR communication and outreach with stakeholders. [18]

Reception

Support

Support for the act stemmed from the goal of avoiding negative impacts of lowering the water table and subsidence throughout California with implementing specific, measurable objectives. California has had a long history of complex water rights dealing with the ownership and management of surface water. Groundwater has stayed under the regulation radar, which led to the overdraft of vital basins and the subsidence of land taking place throughout the Central Valley. The SGMA gives responsibility to both state authority and local oversight to bring groundwater basins in California to sustainable yields within a given time period.

Opposition

One of the main arguments in opposition of AB 1739 and SB 1168 was from the California Farm Bureau Federation (CFBF), which was concerned that the bills were rushed and did not allow enough time to address many of the complex issues of groundwater. In addition, the Farm Bureau explained that there would be "huge long-term economic impacts" on farms as well as state and local economies, with a "very real potential to devalue land", thereby affecting the viability of farms and business as well as jobs. [19] Opponents from the CFBF included counties in the Central Valley and agricultural businesses. [20]

Implementation

The approval of Proposition 1, the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act, guaranteed $900 million in funding for the development of a Groundwater Sustainability Program. [21] The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) administers $800 million, [22] and the DWR will administer the remaining $100 million as Sustainable Groundwater Planning Grant Funds for developing programs that support the SGMA. [23] The DWR has released the first draft of the Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP) for GSPs. This initial PSP has made $86.3 million available for the, "planning, development, or preparation of GSPs" and a minimum of $10 million from the initial PSP has been earmarked for Severely Disadvantaged Communities. [8] Eligibility for grant approval requires that the GSPs address high- or medium-priority basins. The SWRCB has already released its initial round of funding for certain preventive and restorative groundwater initiatives which can be seen below.

GWGP Prop 1, Preliminary Award Projects.png

Full implementation of the groundwater sustainability act could force 750,000 acres (300,000 ha) of farmland out of production according to the Public Policy Institute of California. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Aqueduct</span> Water supply project

The Governor Edmund G. Brown California Aqueduct is a system of canals, tunnels, and pipelines that conveys water collected from the Sierra Nevada Mountains and valleys of Northern and Central California to Southern California. Named after California Governor Edmund Gerald "Pat" Brown Sr., the over 400-mile (640 km) aqueduct is the principal feature of the California State Water Project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Department of Water Resources</span>

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is part of the California Natural Resources Agency and is responsible for the management and regulation of the State of California's water usage. The department was created in 1956 by Governor Goodwin Knight following severe flooding across Northern California in 1955, where they combined the Division of Water Resources of the Department of Public Works with the State Engineer's Office, the Water Project Authority, and the State Water Resources Board. It is headquartered in Sacramento.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Westlands Water District</span>

Westlands Water District is a water district in central California, a local-government entity formed in 1952, that holds long-term contracts for water supplied by the Central Valley Project and the California State Water Project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overdrafting</span> Unsustainable extraction of groundwater

Overdrafting is the process of extracting groundwater beyond the equilibrium yield of an aquifer. Groundwater is one of the largest sources of fresh water and is found underground. The primary cause of groundwater depletion is the excessive pumping of groundwater up from underground aquifers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fran Pavley</span> Politician from California, United States

Frances J. "Fran" Pavley is an American politician who served two terms in the California State Senate and three terms in the California State Assembly. A Democrat, she last represented the 27th Senate District, which encompasses the Conejo Valley, and portions of the San Fernando and Santa Clarita Valleys. Due to term limits in California, Senator Pavley completed her legislative career in 2016. She is currently working as the Environmental Policy Director for the USC Schwarzenegger Institute.

The Turlock Basin is a sub-basin of the San Joaquin Valley groundwater basin which occupies approximately 13,700 total square miles, making it the largest groundwater basin in California. The Turlock Basin makes up 542 square miles of this total. This aquifer is located within Merced and Stanislaus counties in the Central Valley bounded by the Tuolumne River to the north, the Merced River to the south and San Joaquin River to the west. The Sierra Nevada foothills bound the sub-basin to the east. Groundwater in the San Joaquin Valley occurs mostly in younger alluvial material. The Turlock Basin lies to the east of the city of Turlock. Groundwater in the Turlock Basin occurs in older alluvial deposits. Large portions of the San Joaquin Basin have experienced overdraft of water and infiltration of agricultural water pollutants, resulting in poor water quality.

The California State Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Planning is the process that promotes bringing together and prioritizing water-related efforts in the region in a systematic way to ensure sustainable water uses, reliable water supplies, better water quality, environmental stewardship, efficient urban development, protection of agriculture, and a strong economy. IRWM incorporates the physical, environmental, societal, economic, legal, and jurisdictional aspects of water management into regional solutions through open and collaborative stakeholder processes to promote sustainable water use.

Water resources management is a key element of Brazil's strategy to promote sustainable growth and a more equitable and inclusive society. Brazil's achievements over the past 70 years have been closely linked to the development of hydraulic infrastructure for hydroelectric power generation and just recently to the development of irrigation infrastructure, especially in the Northeast region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water in California</span> Water supply and distribution in the U.S. state of California

California's interconnected water system serves over 30 million people and irrigates over 5,680,000 acres (2,300,000 ha) of farmland. As the world's largest, most productive, and potentially most controversial water system, it manages over 40 million acre-feet (49 km3) of water per year.

River basin management plans are a management tool in integrated water resources management. They generally contain descriptions of the water resources in a drainage basin and water allocation plans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental effects of irrigation</span> Land & irrigation

The environmental effects of irrigation relate to the changes in quantity and quality of soil and water as a result of irrigation and the subsequent effects on natural and social conditions in river basins and downstream of an irrigation scheme. The effects stem from the altered hydrological conditions caused by the installation and operation of the irrigation scheme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California State Water Resources Control Board</span>

The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is one of six branches of the California Environmental Protection Agency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Water Plan</span> Strategic plan for managing and developing water resources

The California Water Plan is the State of California’s long-term strategic plan for managing and developing water resources throughout the state. The Water Plan is mandated by California Water Code Sections 10004–10013, and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is required to update the plan every five years. Although the Water Plan does not create mandates, propose specific projects, or authorize funding, Water Code Section 10005 defines the plan and its updates as “the master plan which guides the orderly and coordinated control, protection, conservation, development, management and efficient utilization of the water resources of the state.” Eleven updates to the plan have been prepared since 1957.

The Water Conservation Act of 2009 is a California state law that requires the state to reduce urban water consumption by 20% by the year 2020. It originated as a bill written by Democratic Senator Darrell Steinberg and was enacted on November 10, 2009. The key purpose of the law is to encourage both urban and agricultural water providers to implement conservation strategies, monitor water usage, and report data to the Department of Water Resources (DWR). The law sets goals and deadlines regarding when the implementations must occur and, in an attempt to encourage participation, makes water suppliers ineligible for state water grants or loans unless certain terms have been met.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act</span>

The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act is pioneering clean water act of California that expanded the enforcement authority of the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The act provided for the California Environmental Protection Agency to create the local boards and better protect water rights and water quality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water reuse in California</span>

Water reuse in California is the use of reclaimed water for beneficial use. As a heavily populated state in the drought-prone arid west, water reuse is developing as an integral part of water in California enabling both the economy and population to grow.

The Central Valley in California subsides when groundwater is pumped faster than underground aquifers can be recharged. The Central Valley has been sinking (subsiding) at differing rates since the 1920s and is estimated to have sunk up to 28 feet. During drought years, the valley is prone to accelerated subsidence due to groundwater extraction. California periodically experiences droughts of varying lengths and severity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program</span>

The Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program (GAMA) is an all-inclusive monitoring program for groundwater that was implemented in 2000 in California, United States. It was created by the California State Water Resources Control Board as an improvement from groundwater programs that were already in place.

Borrego Valley Groundwater Basin, located in the very southern region of California, is one of the driest basins in the state. With climate change predicted to have strong effects into foreseeable future, the region is viewed with a skepticism in the sustainable use of water at current rates of consumption. Both natural and man-made geographic divisions within this basin allow for a closer inspection of the various management techniques implemented throughout the years, and provide a basis for what may be pursued for an uncertain future.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Valley groundwater pollution</span> Groundwater pollution in Central Valley, California

Contaminated groundwater in the Central Valley of California is a growing problem due to contamination and overuse. This problem is compounded by the overdrafting of underground aquifers.

References

  1. 1 2 "Groundwater: Sustainable Groundwater Management Act". Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of California, Davis. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
  2. ↑ "SGMA Portal".
  3. 1 2 "Understanding California's Groundwater | Water in the West". Stanford University. Retrieved 2016-04-01.
  4. ↑ "Department of Water Resources Critically Overdrafted Basins Website".
  5. ↑ Tara Moran (April 2015). Amanda Cravens (ed.). California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014: Recommendations for Preventing and Resolving Groundwater Conflicts (PDF). Stanford, CA: Water in the West, Stanford University.
  6. ↑ "Bulletin 118 - Interim Update 2016" (PDF).
  7. ↑ "Sustainable Groundwater Management Act" (PDF). Retrieved 6 August 2017.
  8. 1 2 "Proposal Solicitation Package For Groundwater Sustainability Plans and Projects" (PDF).
  9. ↑ "Bill Text - SB-1319 Groundwater". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-25.
  10. ↑ "California's Groundwater, Update 2003".
  11. ↑ "The 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: A Handbook to Understanding and Implementing the Law" (PDF). watereducation.org. Water Education Foundation. 2015. Retrieved May 7, 2016.
  12. 1 2 "Bill Text - SB-1168 Groundwater management". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-07.
  13. ↑ CA Department of Water Resources. "Groundwater Sustainability Agencies". water.ca.gov. State of California. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  14. ↑ University of California, Davis (2015). The 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: A Handbook to Understanding and Implementing the Law (PDF). Sacramento, CA: Water Education Foundation. pp. 1–90. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  15. ↑ Kincaid, Valerie; Stager, Ryan (September 2015). Know Your Options: A Guide to Forming Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (PDF). California Water Foundation. pp. 1–44. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  16. ↑ University of California, Davis (2015). The 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: A Handbook to Understanding and Implementing the Law (PDF). Sacramento, CA: Water Education Foundation. pp. 1–90. Retrieved 8 May 2016.
  17. ↑ Resources, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural. "Sustainable Groundwater Management Act". groundwater.ucdavis.edu. Retrieved 2016-04-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ↑ "Groundwater Sustainability Program". water.ca.gov. California Department of Water Resources. March 9, 2015.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  19. ↑ "Bill Analysis". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-04.
  20. ↑ Cannon Leahy, Tina (January 2016). "Desperate Times Call for Sensible Measures: The Making of the California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act". Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal. 9 (4): 34.
  21. ↑ Draft Proposal Solicitation Package for Groundwater Sustainability Plans and Projects. "Draft Proposal Solicitation Package for Groundwater Sustainability Plans and Projects" . Retrieved 6 August 2017.
  22. ↑ "State Water Board Approves Proposition 1 Funding for Cleanup of Groundwater Contamination" (PDF). Retrieved 6 August 2017.
  23. ↑ "Sustainable Groundwater Management Act" (PDF). Retrieved 6 August 2017.
  24. ↑ "State Water Board Approves Proposition 1 Funding for Cleanup of Groundwater Contamination" (PDF). 6 August 2017. Retrieved 7 August 2017.
  25. ↑ Walters, Dan (November 30, 2021). "Column: Drought has big impacts on California agriculture". Ventura County Star. Retrieved 2021-12-01.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.