Tandem mass tag

Last updated

A tandem mass tag (TMT) is a chemical label that facilitates sample multiplexing in mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantification and identification of biological macromolecules such as proteins, peptides and nucleic acids. TMT belongs to a family of reagents referred to as isobaric mass tags which are a set of molecules with the same mass, but yield reporter ions of differing mass after fragmentation. The relative ratio of the measured reporter ions represents the relative abundance of the tagged molecule, although ion suppression has a detrimental effect on accuracy. [1] [2] Despite these complications, TMT-based proteomics has been shown to afford higher precision than Label-free quantification. [3] In addition to aiding in protein quantification, TMT tags can also increase the detection sensitivity of certain highly hydrophilic analytes, such as phosphopeptides, in RPLC-MS analyses. [4]

Contents

Versions

There are currently six varieties of TMT available: TMTzero, a non-isotopically substituted core structure; TMTduplex, an isobaric pair of mass tags with a single isotopic substitution; [5] TMTsixplex, an isobaric set of six mass tags with five isotopic substitutions; [6] [ non-primary source needed ] TMT 10-plex – a set of 10 isotopic mass tags which use the TMTsixplex reporter region, but use different elemental isotope to create a mass difference of 0.0063 Da, [7] [ non-primary source needed ] TMTpro a 16 plex version with a different reporter and mass normalizer than the original TMT, and TMTpro Zero.

Mass Shift of Different TMT Reagents
Mass shift
TMT 0224.152478
TMT 2225.155833
TMT 6/10229.162932
TMT 11229.169252
TMT Pro-zero295.18959
TMT Pro304.2071

The tags contain four regions, namely a mass reporter region (M), a cleavable linker region (F), a mass normalization region (N) and a protein reactive group (R). The chemical structures of all the tags are identical but each contains isotopes substituted at various positions, such that the mass reporter and mass normalization regions have different molecular masses in each tag. The combined M-F-N-R regions of the tags have the same total molecular weights and structure so that during chromatographic or electrophoretic separation and in single MS mode, molecules labelled with different tags are indistinguishable. Upon fragmentation in MS/MS mode, sequence information is obtained from fragmentation of the peptide back bone and quantification data are simultaneously obtained from fragmentation of the tags, giving rise to mass reporter ions.

Quantification of labeled peptides

The structures of TMT tags are publicly available through the unimod database at unimod.org and hence, mass spectrometry software such as Mascot are able to account for the tag masses. Additionally, as of version 2.2, Mascot has the capability to quantify using TMT and other isobaric mass tags without the use of additional software. Intuitively, the trust associated with a protein measurement depends on the similarity of ratios from different peptides and the signal level of these measurements. A mathematically rigorous approach called BACIQ, that integrates peptide intensities and peptide-measurement agreement into confidence intervals for protein ratios has emerged. [8] The TKO standard can be used to assess interference [9] [ non-primary source needed ]

Isobaric carrier concept

TMT tags are commonly used to label samples of equal abundance. If one of the labeled samples is more abundant, however, it may increase the sensitivity of the analysis for all samples. [10] Such isobarically labeled samples are referred to as isobaric carriers. They were introduced for single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry, [11] and have found many other applications. [12]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proteomics</span> Large-scale study of proteins

Proteomics is the large-scale study of proteins. Proteins are vital parts of living organisms, with many functions such as the formation of structural fibers of muscle tissue, enzymatic digestion of food, or synthesis and replication of DNA. In addition, other kinds of proteins include antibodies that protect an organism from infection, and hormones that send important signals throughout the body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tandem mass spectrometry</span> Type of mass spectrometry

Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is a technique in instrumental analysis where two or more stages of analysis using one or more mass analyzer are performed with an additional reaction step in between these analyses to increase their abilities to analyse chemical samples. A common use of tandem MS is the analysis of biomolecules, such as proteins and peptides.

PEAKS is a proteomics software program for tandem mass spectrometry designed for peptide sequencing, protein identification and quantification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protein mass spectrometry</span> Application of mass spectrometry

Protein mass spectrometry refers to the application of mass spectrometry to the study of proteins. Mass spectrometry is an important method for the accurate mass determination and characterization of proteins, and a variety of methods and instrumentations have been developed for its many uses. Its applications include the identification of proteins and their post-translational modifications, the elucidation of protein complexes, their subunits and functional interactions, as well as the global measurement of proteins in proteomics. It can also be used to localize proteins to the various organelles, and determine the interactions between different proteins as well as with membrane lipids.

Shotgun proteomics refers to the use of bottom-up proteomics techniques in identifying proteins in complex mixtures using a combination of high performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry. The name is derived from shotgun sequencing of DNA which is itself named after the rapidly expanding, quasi-random firing pattern of a shotgun. The most common method of shotgun proteomics starts with the proteins in the mixture being digested and the resulting peptides are separated by liquid chromatography. Tandem mass spectrometry is then used to identify the peptides.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Top-down proteomics</span>

Top-down proteomics is a method of protein identification that either uses an ion trapping mass spectrometer to store an isolated protein ion for mass measurement and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis or other protein purification methods such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in conjunction with MS/MS. Top-down proteomics is capable of identifying and quantitating unique proteoforms through the analysis of intact proteins. The name is derived from the similar approach to DNA sequencing. During mass spectrometry intact proteins are typically ionized by electrospray ionization and trapped in a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance, quadrupole ion trap or Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Fragmentation for tandem mass spectrometry is accomplished by electron-capture dissociation or electron-transfer dissociation. Effective fractionation is critical for sample handling before mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Proteome analysis routinely involves digesting intact proteins followed by inferred protein identification using mass spectrometry (MS). Top-down MS (non-gel) proteomics interrogates protein structure through measurement of an intact mass followed by direct ion dissociation in the gas phase.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantitative proteomics</span> Analytical chemistry technique

Quantitative proteomics is an analytical chemistry technique for determining the amount of proteins in a sample. The methods for protein identification are identical to those used in general proteomics, but include quantification as an additional dimension. Rather than just providing lists of proteins identified in a certain sample, quantitative proteomics yields information about the physiological differences between two biological samples. For example, this approach can be used to compare samples from healthy and diseased patients. Quantitative proteomics is mainly performed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), preparative native PAGE, or mass spectrometry (MS). However, a recent developed method of quantitative dot blot (QDB) analysis is able to measure both the absolute and relative quantity of an individual proteins in the sample in high throughput format, thus open a new direction for proteomic research. In contrast to 2-DE, which requires MS for the downstream protein identification, MS technology can identify and quantify the changes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation</span>

Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) is an isobaric labeling method used in quantitative proteomics by tandem mass spectrometry to determine the amount of proteins from different sources in a single experiment. It uses stable isotope labeled molecules that can be covalent bonded to the N-terminus and side chain amines of proteins.

Label-free quantification is a method in mass spectrometry that aims to determine the relative amount of proteins in two or more biological samples. Unlike other methods for protein quantification, label-free quantification does not use a stable isotope containing compound to chemically bind to and thus label the protein.

An isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) is an in-vitro isotopic labeling method used for quantitative proteomics by mass spectrometry that uses chemical labeling reagents. These chemical probes consist of three elements: a reactive group for labeling an amino acid side chain, an isotopically coded linker, and a tag for the affinity isolation of labeled proteins/peptides. The samples are combined and then separated through chromatography, then sent through a mass spectrometer to determine the mass-to-charge ratio between the proteins. Only cysteine containing peptides can be analysed. Since only cysteine containing peptides are analysed, often the post translational modification is lost.

OpenMS is an open-source project for data analysis and processing in mass spectrometry and is released under the 3-clause BSD licence. It supports most common operating systems including Microsoft Windows, MacOS and Linux.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Selected reaction monitoring</span> Tandem mass spectrometry method

Selected reaction monitoring (SRM), also called multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), is a method used in tandem mass spectrometry in which an ion of a particular mass is selected in the first stage of a tandem mass spectrometer and an ion product of a fragmentation reaction of the precursor ions is selected in the second mass spectrometer stage for detection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Isobaric labeling</span>

Isobaric labeling is a mass spectrometry strategy used in quantitative proteomics. Peptides or proteins are labeled with chemical groups that have identical mass (isobaric), but vary in terms of distribution of heavy isotopes in their structure. These tags, commonly referred to as tandem mass tags, are designed so that the mass tag is cleaved at a specific linker region upon high-energy CID (HCD) during tandem mass spectrometry yielding reporter ions of different masses. The most common isobaric tags are amine-reactive tags. However, tags that react with cysteine residues and carbonyl groups have also been described. These amine-reactive groups go through N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) reactions, which are based around three types of functional groups. Isobaric labeling methods include tandem mass tags (TMT), isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), mass differential tags for absolute and relative quantification, and dimethyl labeling. TMTs and iTRAQ methods are most common and developed of these methods. Tandem mass tags have a mass reporter region, a cleavable linker region, a mass normalization region, and a protein reactive group and have the same total mass.

Terminal amine isotopic labeling of substrates (TAILS) is a method in quantitative proteomics that identifies the protein content of samples based on N-terminal fragments of each protein and detects differences in protein abundance among samples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Single-cell analysis</span> Testbg biochemical processes and reactions in an individual cell

In the field of cellular biology, single-cell analysis and subcellular analysis is the study of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and cell–cell interactions at the single cell level. The concept of single-cell analysis originated in the 1970s. Before the discovery of heterogeneity, single-cell analysis mainly referred to the analysis or manipulation of an individual cell in a bulk population of cells at a particular condition using optical or electronic microscope. To date, due to the heterogeneity seen in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cell populations, analyzing a single cell makes it possible to discover mechanisms not seen when studying a bulk population of cells. Technologies such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) allow the precise isolation of selected single cells from complex samples, while high throughput single cell partitioning technologies, enable the simultaneous molecular analysis of hundreds or thousands of single unsorted cells; this is particularly useful for the analysis of transcriptome variation in genotypically identical cells, allowing the definition of otherwise undetectable cell subtypes. The development of new technologies is increasing our ability to analyze the genome and transcriptome of single cells, as well as to quantify their proteome and metabolome. Mass spectrometry techniques have become important analytical tools for proteomic and metabolomic analysis of single cells. Recent advances have enabled quantifying thousands of protein across hundreds of single cells, and thus make possible new types of analysis. In situ sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) do not require that cells be isolated and are increasingly being used for analysis of tissues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald Beavis</span> Canadian protein biochemist

Ronald Charles Beavis is a Canadian protein biochemist, who has been involved in the application of mass spectrometry to protein primary structure, with applications in the fields of proteomics and analytical biochemistry. He has developed methods for measuring the identity and post-translational modification state of proteins obtained from biological samples using mass spectrometry. He is currently best known for developing new methods for analyzing proteomics data and applying the results of these methods to problems in computational biology.

Renã A. S. Robinson is an associate professor and the Dorothy J. Wingfield Phillips Chancellor's Faculty Fellow in the department of chemistry at the Vanderbilt University, where she is the principal investigator of the RASR Laboratory.

Skyline is an open source software for targeted proteomics and metabolomics data analysis. It runs on Microsoft Windows and supports the raw data formats from multiple mass spectrometric vendors. It contains a graphical user interface to display chromatographic data for individual peptide or small molecule analytes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient protein</span>

Ancient proteins are complex mixtures and the term palaeoproteomics is used to characterise the study of proteomes in the past. Ancients proteins have been recovered from a wide range of archaeological materials, including bones, teeth, eggshells, leathers, parchments, ceramics, painting binders and well-preserved soft tissues like gut intestines. These preserved proteins have provided valuable information about taxonomic identification, evolution history (phylogeny), diet, health, disease, technology and social dynamics in the past.

References

  1. ↑ O'Brien JJ, O'Connell JD, Paulo JA, Thakurta S, Rose CM, Weekes MP, et al. (January 2018). "Compositional Proteomics: Effects of Spatial Constraints on Protein Quantification Utilizing Isobaric Tags". Journal of Proteome Research. 17 (1): 590–599. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00699. PMC   5806995 . PMID   29195270.
  2. ↑ Brenes A, Hukelmann J, Bensaddek D, Lamond AI (October 2019). "Multibatch TMT Reveals False Positives, Batch Effects and Missing Values". Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 18 (10): 1967–1980. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA119.001472 . PMC   6773557 . PMID   31332098.
  3. ↑ O'Connell JD, Paulo JA, O'Brien JJ, Gygi SP (May 2018). "Proteome-Wide Evaluation of Two Common Protein Quantification Methods". Journal of Proteome Research. 17 (5): 1934–1942. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00016. PMC   5984592 . PMID   29635916.
  4. ↑ Tsai CF, Smith JS, Krajewski K, Zhao R, Moghieb AM, Nicora CD, et al. (September 2019). "Tandem Mass Tag Labeling Facilitates Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Hydrophilic Phosphopeptides". Analytical Chemistry. 91 (18): 11606–11613. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01814. PMC   7197904 . PMID   31418558.
  5. ↑ Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K, Kienle S, Schwarz J, Schmidt G, et al. (April 2003). "Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS". Analytical Chemistry. 75 (8): 1895–904. doi:10.1021/ac0262560. PMID   12713048.
  6. ↑ Dayon L, Hainard A, Licker V, Turck N, Kuhn K, Hochstrasser DF, et al. (April 2008). "Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags". Analytical Chemistry. 80 (8): 2921–31. doi:10.1021/ac702422x. PMID   18312001.
  7. ↑ Werner T, Sweetman G, Savitski MF, Mathieson T, Bantscheff M, Savitski MM (April 2014). "Ion coalescence of neutron encoded TMT 10-plex reporter ions". Analytical Chemistry. 86 (7): 3594–601. doi:10.1021/ac500140s. PMID   24579773.
  8. ↑ Peshkin, L.; Ryazanova, L.; Wuhr, M.; et al. (2017). "Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Multiplexed Proteomics Integrate Ion-Statistics with Peptide Quantification Concordance". bioRxiv   10.1101/210476 .
  9. ↑ Paulo JA, O'Connell JD, Gygi SP (October 2016). "A Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteomics Standard for Diagnosing Ion Interference in Isobaric Labeling Experiments". Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 27 (10): 1620–5. Bibcode:2016JASMS..27.1620P. doi:10.1007/s13361-016-1434-9. PMC   5018445 . PMID   27400695.
  10. ↑ Specht H, Slavov N (January 2021). "Optimizing Accuracy and Depth of Protein Quantification in Experiments Using Isobaric Carriers". Journal of Proteome Research. 20 (1): 880–887. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00675. PMC   7775882 . PMID   33190502.
  11. ↑ Budnik B, Levy E, Harmange G, Slavov N (October 2018). "SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation". Genome Biology. 19 (1): 161. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1547-5 . PMC   6196420 . PMID   30343672.
  12. ↑ Slavov N (February 2021). "Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry". Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 60: 1–9. arXiv: 2004.02069 . doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.04.018. PMC   7767890 . PMID   32599342.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.