![]() | This article lacks context for people who have not read the book.(February 2011) |
Author | Edward Shepherd Creasy |
---|---|
Language | English |
Subject | History |
Publication date | 1851 |
Publication place | United Kingdom and India |
Media type | Paper |
The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World: from Marathon to Waterloo is a book written by Sir Edward Shepherd Creasy and published in 1851. This book tells the story of the fifteen military engagements which, according to the author, had a significant impact on world history. [1]
Each chapter of the book describes a different battle. The fifteen chapters are: [2]
Since the publication of Creasy's book, other historians have attempted to modify or add to the list.
Referring to Creasy's work in the Gilbert and Sullivan operetta The Pirates of Penzance , Major-General Stanley boasts that he is able to "quote the fights historical; from Marathon to Waterloo, in order categorical."
Creasy's text, while immensely popular at the time, and still frequently read today [3] came into an increasing amount of criticism from the 20th century onwards in regards to several aspects. [4]
The vast majority of Creasy's selected battles occurred in Europe between two European powers (or in the case of the Battle of Saratoga, between two Western powers). In addition, many of his battles feature England in some capacity, leaving a lack of balance in regards to non-European history. [4]
Creasy's text is premised on the fact that his chosen battles were decisive - that an alternate result (or the absence of the battle) would lead to the world as we know it being radically different. [5] This viewpoint has been frequently criticised in the last century, with most, though not all, viewpoints disagreeing that (these) singular battles were the primary movers of society. [5] [4]
Beyond potential errors in choice or concept, Creasy is criticised for the vagueness of his descriptions, sources given and battle analysis. By World War I, fully reconstructed battle movements and plans were considered the norm if true analysis was to be undertaken. [4] The lack of context, both political and social, around the battles chosen makes consideration of its various impacts either difficult or impossible. [6] There is also a focus on dramatic description or rhetoric of the battles taking precedence over analysis. [6] Set against this however is the fact that Creasy did not specifically set out to target his works for the military or military historians - he also wrote for public readership, and was without military experience or formal training in the field. [7]