| | |
| Editor | Ann VanderMeer and Jeff VanderMeer |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Genre | New weird, Anthology |
| Publisher | Tachyon Publications |
Publication date | 2008 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 432 |
| ISBN | 978-1892391551 |
The New Weird is a 2008 anthology edited by Ann VanderMeer and Jeff VanderMeer and published by Tachyon Publications. It serves as a definitive collection and critical overview of the "New Weird" literary movement, which emerged in the 1990s and early 2000s at the intersection of science fiction, fantasy, and horror.
The anthology is considered a thematic predecessor to the VanderMeers' later, more expansive collection, The Weird (2011); while The New Weird focused on codifying a contemporary 21st-century movement, the latter volume provided a comprehensive century-long retrospective of the genre's history.
The anthology is divided into four sections designed to trace the history and impact of the subgenre:
The New Weird received critical acclaim for its comprehensive approach to the genre. Publishers Weekly , in a starred review, described it as an essential demonstration of the "sheer breadth" of the subgenre, comparing its significance to the Cyberpunk defining-anthology Mirrorshades . [1] Library Journal also gave the collection a starred review, recommending it as the "first comprehensive anthology of the movement." [2]
The Guardian highlighted the anthology as a "rough guide" to a pivotal literary moment, noting the value of its critical commentary alongside its fiction. [3] Writing for Strange Horizons , critic Paul Kincaid praised the work for engaging in a meaningful debate about the "nascent sub-genre." [4]
The anthology is frequently cited in academic discourse regarding genre theory and the evolution of speculative fiction. Scholar Paweł Frelik, writing for Science Fiction Studies , referenced the work in his analysis of the "New Weird" as a distinct aesthetic and political movement. [5] The Los Angeles Review of Books has described the VanderMeers' editorial work on this volume and its successors as "monumental" and "historical," noting that it helped reframe the history of science fiction by codifying the boundaries of "The Weird." [6] In her study of the Anthropocene and genre, scholar Erin James notes that the anthology's "Laboratory" section serves as a crucial primary source for understanding how authors self-consciously negotiate the "unsettling" and "messy" boundaries of the real. [7] Furthermore, critics writing for Bloomsbury have argued that the collection functioned as a critical intervention that successfully moved "weird" fiction away from its 20th-century roots in horror and toward a more hybridized, "new" form of literary surrealism. [8]