Van der Pauw method

The van der Pauw Method is a technique commonly used to measure the resistivity and the Hall coefficient of a sample. Its strength lies in its ability to accurately measure the properties of a sample of any arbitrary shape, as long as the sample is approximately two-dimensional (i.e. it is much thinner than it is wide), solid (no holes), and the electrodes are placed on its perimeter. The van der Pauw method employs a four-point probe placed around the perimeter of the sample, in contrast to the linear four point probe: this allows the van der Pauw method to provide an average resistivity of the sample, whereas a linear array provides the resistivity in the sensing direction. ^[1] This difference becomes important for anisotropic materials, which can be properly measured using the Montgomery Method, an extension of the van der Pauw Method (see, for instance, reference ^[2] ).

From the measurements made, the following properties of the material can be calculated:

• The resistivity of the material
• The doping type (i.e. whether it is a P-type or N-type material)
• The sheet carrier density of the majority carrier (the number of majority carriers per unit area). From this the charge density and doping level can be found
• The mobility of the majority carrier

The method was first propounded by Leo J. van der Pauw in 1958. ^[3]

Conditions

There are five conditions that must be satisfied to use this technique: ^[4]
1. The sample must have a flat shape of uniform thickness
2. The sample must not have any isolated holes
3. The sample must be homogeneous and isotropic
4. All four contacts must be located at the edges of the sample
5. The area of contact of any individual contact should be at least an order of magnitude smaller than the area of the entire sample.

The second condition can be weakened. The van der Pauw technique can also be applied to samples with one hole. ^{[5] [6]}

Sample preparation

In order to use the van der Pauw method, the sample thickness must be much less than the width and length of the sample. In order to reduce errors in the calculations, it is preferable that the sample be symmetrical. There must also be no isolated holes within the sample.

Some possible contact placements

The measurements require that four ohmic contacts be placed on the sample. Certain conditions for their placement need to be met:

• They must be as small as possible; any errors given by their non-zero size will be of the order D/L, where D is the average diameter of the contact and L is the distance between the contacts.
• They must be as close as possible to the boundary of the sample.

In addition to this, any leads from the contacts should be constructed from the same batch of wire to minimise thermoelectric effects. For the same reason, all four contacts should be of the same material.

Measurement definitions

• The contacts are numbered from 1 to 4 in a counter-clockwise order, beginning at the top-left contact.
• The current I₁₂ is a positive DC current injected into contact 1 and taken out of contact 2, and is measured in amperes (A).
• The voltage V₃₄ is a DC voltage measured between contacts 3 and 4 (i.e.V₄ - V₃) with no externally applied magnetic field, measured in volts (V).
• The resistivity ρ is measured in ohms⋅metres (Ω⋅m).
• The thickness of the sample t is measured in metres (m).
• The sheet resistance R_S is measured in ohms per square (Ω/sq or ${\displaystyle \Omega /\Box }$).

Resistivity measurements

The average resistivity of a sample is given by ρ = R_S⋅t, where the sheet resistance R_S is determined as follows. For an anisotropic material, the individual resistivity components, e.g. ρ_x or ρ_y, can be calculated using the Montgomery method.

Basic measurements

To make a measurement, a current is caused to flow along one edge of the sample (for instance, I₁₂) and the voltage across the opposite edge (in this case, V₃₄) is measured. From these two values, a resistance (for this example, ${\displaystyle R_{12,34}}$) can be found using Ohm's law:

${\displaystyle R_{12,34}={\frac {V_{34}}{I_{12}}}}$

In his paper, van der Pauw showed that the sheet resistance of samples with arbitrary shapes can be determined from two of these resistances - one measured along a vertical edge, such as ${\displaystyle R_{12,34}}$, and a corresponding one measured along a horizontal edge, such as ${\displaystyle R_{23,41}}$. The actual sheet resistance is related to these resistances by the van der Pauw formula

${\displaystyle e^{-\pi R_{12,34}/R_{s}}+e^{-\pi R_{23,41}/R_{s}}=1}$

Reciprocal measurements

The reciprocity theorem ^[7] tells us that $${\displaystyle R_{AB,CD}=R_{CD,AB}}$$

Therefore, it is possible to obtain a more precise value for the resistances ${\displaystyle R_{12,34}}$ and ${\displaystyle R_{23,41}}$ by making two additional measurements of their reciprocal values ${\displaystyle R_{34,12}}$ and ${\displaystyle R_{41,23}}$ and averaging the results.

We define $${\displaystyle R_{\text{vertical}}={\frac {R_{12,34}+R_{34,12}}{2}}}$$ and $${\displaystyle R_{\text{horizontal}}={\frac {R_{23,41}+R_{41,23}}{2}}}$$

Then, the van der Pauw formula becomes $${\displaystyle e^{-\pi R_{\text{vertical}}/R_{S}}+e^{-\pi R_{\text{horizontal}}/R_{S}}=1}$$

Reversed polarity measurements

A further improvement in the accuracy of the resistance values can be obtained by repeating the resistance measurements after switching polarities of both the current source and the voltage meter. Since this is still measuring the same portion of the sample, just in the opposite direction, the values of R_vertical and R_horizontal can still be calculated as the averages of the standard and reversed polarity measurements. The benefit of doing this is that any offset voltages, such as thermoelectric potentials due to the Seebeck effect, will be cancelled out.

Combining these methods with the reciprocal measurements from above leads to the formulas for the resistances being

${\displaystyle R_{\text{vertical}}={\frac {R_{12,34}+R_{34,12}+R_{21,43}+R_{43,21}}{4}}}$

and

${\displaystyle R_{\text{horizontal}}={\frac {R_{23,41}+R_{41,23}+R_{32,14}+R_{14,32}}{4}}}$

The van der Pauw formula takes the same form as in the previous section.

Measurement accuracy

Both of the above procedures check the repeatability of the measurements. If any of the reversed polarity measurements don't agree to a sufficient degree of accuracy (usually within 3%) with the corresponding standard polarity measurement, then there is probably a source of error somewhere in the setup, which should be investigated before continuing. The same principle applies to the reciprocal measurements – they should agree to a sufficient degree before they are used in any calculations.

Calculating sheet resistance

In general, the van der Pauw formula cannot be rearranged to give the sheet resistance R_S in terms of known functions. The most notable exception to this is when R_vertical = R = R_horizontal; in this scenario the sheet resistance is given by

${\displaystyle R_{S}={\frac {\pi R}{\ln 2}}}$

The quotient ${\displaystyle \pi /\ln 2}$ is known as the van der Pauw constant and has approximate value 4.53236. In most other scenarios, an iterative method is used to solve the van der Pauw formula numerically for R_S. Typically a formula is considered to fail the preconditions for Banach Fixed Point Theorem, so methods based on it do not work. Instead, nested intervals converge slowly but steadily. Recently, however, it has been shown that an appropriate reformulation of the van der Pauw problem (e.g., by introducing a second van der Pauw formula) makes it fully solvable by the Banach fixed point method. ^[8]

Alternatively, a Newton-Raphson method converges relatively quickly. To reduce the complexity of the notation, the following variables are introduced:

${\displaystyle s=e^{-\pi /{R_{s}}}}$

${\displaystyle R_{v}=R_{vertical}}$

${\displaystyle R_{h}=R_{horizontal}}$

Then the next approximation ${\displaystyle R_{s}^{+}}$ is calculated by

${\displaystyle R_{s}^{+}=R_{s}+R_{s}^{2}{\frac {1-s^{R_{v}}-s^{R_{h}}}{\pi (R_{v}s^{R_{v}}+R_{h}s^{R_{h}})}}}$

Hall measurements

Background

Main article: Hall effect

When a charged particle—such as an electron—is placed in a magnetic field, it experiences a Lorentz force proportional to the strength of the field and the velocity at which it is traveling through it. This force is strongest when the direction of motion is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field; in this case the force

${\displaystyle F_{L}=qvB\,\!}$

where ${\displaystyle q}$ is the charge on the particle in coulombs, ${\displaystyle v}$ the velocity it is traveling at (centimeters per second), and ${\displaystyle B}$ the strength of the magnetic field (Wb/cm²). Note that centimeters are often used to measure length in the semiconductor industry, which is why they are used here instead of the SI units of meters.

The Hall effect as it is used for the van der Pauw method.
(a) - a current flowing through a piece of semiconductor material
(b) - the electrons flowing due to the current
(c) - the electrons accumulating at one edge due to the magnetic field
(d) - the resulting electric field and Hall voltage ${\displaystyle V_{H}}$

When a current is applied to a piece of semiconducting material, this results in a steady flow of electrons through the material (as shown in parts (a) and (b) of the accompanying figure). The velocity the electrons are traveling at is (see electric current):

${\displaystyle v={\frac {I}{nAq}}}$

where ${\displaystyle n}$ is the electron density, ${\displaystyle A}$ is the cross-sectional area of the material and ${\displaystyle q}$ the elementary charge (1.602×10⁻¹⁹ coulombs).

If an external magnetic field is then applied perpendicular to the direction of current flow, then the resulting Lorentz force will cause the electrons to accumulate at one edge of the sample (see part (c) of the figure). Combining the above two equations, and noting that ${\displaystyle q}$ is the charge on an electron, results in a formula for the Lorentz force experienced by the electrons:

${\displaystyle F_{L}={\frac {IB}{nA}}}$

This accumulation will create an electric field across the material due to the uneven distribution of charge, as shown in part (d) of the figure. This in turn leads to a potential difference across the material, known as the Hall voltage ${\displaystyle V_{H}}$. The current, however, continues to only flow along the material, which indicates that the force on the electrons due to the electric field balances the Lorentz force. Since the force on an electron from an electric field ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ is ${\displaystyle q\epsilon }$, we can say that the strength of the electric field is therefore

${\displaystyle \epsilon ={\frac {IB}{qnA}}}$

Finally, the magnitude of the Hall voltage is simply the strength of the electric field multiplied by the width of the material; that is,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}V_{H}&=w\epsilon \\&={\frac {wIB}{qnA}}\\&={\frac {IB}{qnt}}\end{aligned}}}$

where ${\displaystyle t}$ is the thickness of the material. Since the sheet density ${\displaystyle n_{s}}$ is defined as the density of electrons multiplied by the thickness of the material, we can define the Hall voltage in terms of the sheet density:

${\displaystyle V_{H}={\frac {IB}{qn_{s}}}}$

Making the measurements

Two sets of measurements need to be made: one with a magnetic field in the positive z-direction as shown above, and one with it in the negative z-direction. From here on in, the voltages recorded with a positive field will have a subscript P (for example, V_{13, P} = V_{3, P} - V_{1, P}) and those recorded with a negative field will have a subscript N (such as V_{13, N} = V_{3, N} - V_{1, N}). For all of the measurements, the magnitude of the injected current should be kept the same; the magnitude of the magnetic field needs to be the same in both directions also.

First of all with a positive magnetic field, the current I₂₄ is applied to the sample and the voltage V_{13, P} is recorded; note that the voltages can be positive or negative. This is then repeated for I₁₃ and V_{42, P}.

As before, we can take advantage of the reciprocity theorem to provide a check on the accuracy of these measurements. If we reverse the direction of the currents (i.e. apply the current I₄₂ and measure V_{31, P}, and repeat for I₃₁ and V_{24, P}), then V_{13, P} should be the same as V_{31, P} to within a suitably small degree of error. Similarly, V_{42, P} and V_{24, P} should agree.

Having completed the measurements, a negative magnetic field is applied in place of the positive one, and the above procedure is repeated to obtain the voltage measurements V_{13, N}, V_{42, N}, V_{31, N} and V_{24, N}.

Calculations

Initially, the difference of the voltages for positive and negative magnetic fields is calculated:

V₁₃ = V_{13, P} − V_{13, N}
V₂₄ = V_{24, P} − V_{24, N}
V₃₁ = V_{31, P} − V_{31, N}
V₄₂ = V_{42, P} − V_{42, N}

The overall Hall voltage is then

${\displaystyle V_{H}={\frac {V_{13}+V_{24}+V_{31}+V_{42}}{8}}}$.

The polarity of this Hall voltage indicates the type of material the sample is made of; if it is positive, the material is P-type, and if it is negative, the material is N-type.

The formula given in the background can then be rearranged to show that the sheet density

${\displaystyle n_{s}={\frac {IB}{q|V_{H}|}}}$

Note that the strength of the magnetic field B needs to be in units of Wb/cm² if n_s is in cm⁻². For instance, if the strength is given in the commonly used units of teslas, it can be converted by multiplying it by 10⁻⁴.

Other calculations

Mobility

The resistivity of a semiconductor material can be shown to be ^[9]

${\displaystyle \rho ={\frac {1}{q(n\mu _{n}+p\mu _{p})}}}$

where n and p are the concentration of electrons and holes in the material respectively, and μ_n and μ_p are the mobility of the electrons and holes respectively.

Generally, the material is sufficiently doped so that there is a difference of many orders-of-magnitude between the two concentrations, allowing this equation to be simplified to

${\displaystyle \rho ={\frac {1}{qn_{m}\mu _{m}}}}$

where n_m and μ_m are the doping level and mobility of the majority carrier respectively.

If we then note that the sheet resistance R_S is the resistivity divided by the thickness of the sample, and that the sheet density n_S is the doping level multiplied by the thickness, we can divide the equation through by the thickness to get

${\displaystyle R_{s}={\frac {1}{qn_{s}\mu _{m}}}}$

This can then be rearranged to give the majority carrier mobility in terms of the previously calculated sheet resistance and sheet density:

${\displaystyle \mu _{m}={\frac {1}{qn_{s}R_{s}}}}$

Footnotes

1. Koon, D. W.; Knickerbocker, C. J. (1992). "What do you measure when you measure resistivity?". Review of Scientific Instruments. 63 (1): 207–210. Bibcode:1992RScI...63..207K. doi:10.1063/1.1142958.
2. Oliveira, F. S.; Cipriano, R. B.; da Silva, F. T.; Romão, E. C.; dos Santos, C. a. M. (2020-10-02). "Simple analytical method for determining electrical resistivity and sheet resistance using the van der Pauw procedure". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 16379. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1016379O. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72097-1. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   7532437 . PMID   33009433.
3. Van der Pauw, L.J. (1958). "A method of measuring specific resistivity and Hall effect of discs of arbitrary shape" (PDF). Philips Research Reports. 13: 1–9.)
4. Webster, John G (1999). The measurement, instrumentation, and sensors handbook . New York: CRC Press LLC. pp.  43-1. ISBN   3-540-64830-5.
5. Szymański, K.; Cieśliński, J. L.; Łapiński, K. (2013). "Van der Pauw method on a sample with an isolated hole". Physics Letters A. 377 (8): 651–654. arXiv: 1301.1625 . Bibcode:2013PhLA..377..651S. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.01.008. S2CID   119233024.
6. Szymański, K.; Łapiński, K.; Cieśliński, J. L. (2015). "Determination of the Riemann modulus and sheet resistance of a sample with a hole by the van der Pauw method". Measurement Science and Technology. 26 (5): 055003. arXiv: 1412.0707 . Bibcode:2015MeScT..26e5003S. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/26/5/055003. S2CID   119306065.
7. Calvert, James B. (19 April 2003). "Reciprocity". Archived from the original on 30 June 2006.
8. Cieśliński, J. L. (2012). "Modified van der Pauw method based on formulas solvable by the Banach fixed point method". Thin Solid Films. 522: 314–317. arXiv: 1204.0085 . Bibcode:2012TSF...522..314C. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2012.09.018. S2CID   119671849.
9. Sze, S.M. (2001). Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology. New York: Wiley. p. 53. ISBN   0-471-33372-7.

References

• van der Pauw, L.J. (1958). "A method of measuring specific resistivity and Hall effect of discs of arbitrary shape" (PDF). Philips Research Reports. 13: 1–9.
• van der Pauw, L.J. (1958). "A method of measuring the resistivity and Hall coefficient on lamellae of arbitrary shape" (PDF). Philips Technical Review. 20: 220–224.
• "Hall Effect Measurements". National Institute of Standards and Technology. Archived from the original on 2006-06-15. Retrieved 2006-06-24.
• Measuring Electrical Conductivity and Resistivity with the van der Pauw Technique