Van der Pauw method

Last updated • 12 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

The van der Pauw Method is a technique commonly used to measure the resistivity and the Hall coefficient of a sample. Its power lies in its ability to accurately measure the properties of a sample of any arbitrary shape, as long as the sample is approximately two-dimensional (i.e. it is much thinner than it is wide), solid (no holes), and the electrodes are placed on its perimeter. The van der Pauw method employs a four-point probe placed around the perimeter of the sample, in contrast to the linear four point probe: this allows the van der Pauw method to provide an average resistivity of the sample, whereas a linear array provides the resistivity in the sensing direction. [1] This difference becomes important for anisotropic materials, which can be properly measured using the Montgomery Method, an extension of the van der Pauw Method (see, for instance, reference [2] ).

Contents

From the measurements made, the following properties of the material can be calculated:

The method was first propounded by Leo J. van der Pauw in 1958. [3]

Conditions

There are five conditions that must be satisfied to use this technique: [4]
1. The sample must have a flat shape of uniform thickness
2. The sample must not have any isolated holes
3. The sample must be homogeneous and isotropic
4. All four contacts must be located at the edges of the sample
5. The area of contact of any individual contact should be at least an order of magnitude smaller than the area of the entire sample.


The second condition can be weakened. The van der Pauw technique can also be applied to samples with one hole. [5] [6]


Sample preparation

In order to use the van der Pauw method, the sample thickness must be much less than the width and length of the sample. In order to reduce errors in the calculations, it is preferable that the sample be symmetrical. There must also be no isolated holes within the sample.

Some possible contact placements VanderPauwContactPlacement.jpg
Some possible contact placements

The measurements require that four ohmic contacts be placed on the sample. Certain conditions for their placement need to be met:

In addition to this, any leads from the contacts should be constructed from the same batch of wire to minimise thermoelectric effects. For the same reason, all four contacts should be of the same material.

Measurement definitions

Resistivity measurements

The average resistivity of a sample is given by ρ = RS⋅t, where the sheet resistance RS is determined as follows. For an anisotropic material, the individual resistivity components, e.g. ρx or ρy, can be calculated using the Montgomery method.

Basic measurements

To make a measurement, a current is caused to flow along one edge of the sample (for instance, I12) and the voltage across the opposite edge (in this case, V34) is measured. From these two values, a resistance (for this example, ) can be found using Ohm's law:

In his paper, van der Pauw showed that the sheet resistance of samples with arbitrary shapes can be determined from two of these resistances - one measured along a vertical edge, such as , and a corresponding one measured along a horizontal edge, such as . The actual sheet resistance is related to these resistances by the van der Pauw formula

Reciprocal measurements

The reciprocity theorem tells us that

Therefore, it is possible to obtain a more precise value for the resistances and by making two additional measurements of their reciprocal values and and averaging the results.

We define

and

Then, the van der Pauw formula becomes

Reversed polarity measurements

A further improvement in the accuracy of the resistance values can be obtained by repeating the resistance measurements after switching polarities of both the current source and the voltage meter. Since this is still measuring the same portion of the sample, just in the opposite direction, the values of Rvertical and Rhorizontal can still be calculated as the averages of the standard and reversed polarity measurements. The benefit of doing this is that any offset voltages, such as thermoelectric potentials due to the Seebeck effect, will be cancelled out.

Combining these methods with the reciprocal measurements from above leads to the formulas for the resistances being

and

The van der Pauw formula takes the same form as in the previous section.

Measurement accuracy

Both of the above procedures check the repeatability of the measurements. If any of the reversed polarity measurements don't agree to a sufficient degree of accuracy (usually within 3%) with the corresponding standard polarity measurement, then there is probably a source of error somewhere in the setup, which should be investigated before continuing. The same principle applies to the reciprocal measurementsthey should agree to a sufficient degree before they are used in any calculations.

Calculating sheet resistance

In general, the van der Pauw formula cannot be rearranged to give the sheet resistance RS in terms of known functions. The most notable exception to this is when Rvertical = R = Rhorizontal; in this scenario the sheet resistance is given by

The quotient is known as the van der Pauw constant and has approximate value 4.53236. In most other scenarios, an iterative method is used to solve the van der Pauw formula numerically for RS. Typically a formula is considered to fail the preconditions for Banach Fixed Point Theorem, so methods based on it do not work. Instead, nested intervals converge slowly but steadily. Recently, however, it has been shown that an appropriate reformulation of the van der Pauw problem (e.g., by introducing a second van der Pauw formula) makes it fully solvable by the Banach fixed point method. [7]

Alternatively, a Newton-Raphson method converges relatively quickly. To reduce the complexity of the notation, the following variables are introduced:

Then the next approximation is calculated by

Hall measurements

Background

When a charged particlesuch as an electronis placed in a magnetic field, it experiences a Lorentz force proportional to the strength of the field and the velocity at which it is traveling through it. This force is strongest when the direction of motion is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field; in this case the force

where is the charge on the particle in coulombs, the velocity it is traveling at (centimeters per second), and the strength of the magnetic field (Wb/cm2). Note that centimeters are often used to measure length in the semiconductor industry, which is why they are used here instead of the SI units of meters.

The Hall effect as it is used for the van der Pauw method.
(a) - a current flowing through a piece of semiconductor material
(b) - the electrons flowing due to the current
(c) - the electrons accumulating at one edge due to the magnetic field
(d) - the resulting electric field and Hall voltage
V
H
{\displaystyle V_{H}} Van der Pauw Method - Hall Effect.png
The Hall effect as it is used for the van der Pauw method.
(a) - a current flowing through a piece of semiconductor material
(b) - the electrons flowing due to the current
(c) - the electrons accumulating at one edge due to the magnetic field
(d) - the resulting electric field and Hall voltage

When a current is applied to a piece of semiconducting material, this results in a steady flow of electrons through the material (as shown in parts (a) and (b) of the accompanying figure). The velocity the electrons are traveling at is (see electric current):

where is the electron density, is the cross-sectional area of the material and the elementary charge (1.602×10−19 coulombs).

If an external magnetic field is then applied perpendicular to the direction of current flow, then the resulting Lorentz force will cause the electrons to accumulate at one edge of the sample (see part (c) of the figure). Combining the above two equations, and noting that is the charge on an electron, results in a formula for the Lorentz force experienced by the electrons:

This accumulation will create an electric field across the material due to the uneven distribution of charge, as shown in part (d) of the figure. This in turn leads to a potential difference across the material, known as the Hall voltage . The current, however, continues to only flow along the material, which indicates that the force on the electrons due to the electric field balances the Lorentz force. Since the force on an electron from an electric field is , we can say that the strength of the electric field is therefore

Finally, the magnitude of the Hall voltage is simply the strength of the electric field multiplied by the width of the material; that is,

where is the thickness of the material. Since the sheet density is defined as the density of electrons multiplied by the thickness of the material, we can define the Hall voltage in terms of the sheet density:

Making the measurements

Two sets of measurements need to be made: one with a magnetic field in the positive z-direction as shown above, and one with it in the negative z-direction. From here on in, the voltages recorded with a positive field will have a subscript P (for example, V13, P = V3, P - V1, P) and those recorded with a negative field will have a subscript N (such as V13, N = V3, N - V1, N). For all of the measurements, the magnitude of the injected current should be kept the same; the magnitude of the magnetic field needs to be the same in both directions also.

First of all with a positive magnetic field, the current I24 is applied to the sample and the voltage V13, P is recorded; note that the voltages can be positive or negative. This is then repeated for I13 and V42, P.

As before, we can take advantage of the reciprocity theorem to provide a check on the accuracy of these measurements. If we reverse the direction of the currents (i.e. apply the current I42 and measure V31, P, and repeat for I31 and V24, P), then V13, P should be the same as V31, P to within a suitably small degree of error. Similarly, V42, P and V24, P should agree.

Having completed the measurements, a negative magnetic field is applied in place of the positive one, and the above procedure is repeated to obtain the voltage measurements V13, N, V42, N, V31, N and V24, N.

Calculations

Initially, the difference of the voltages for positive and negative magnetic fields is calculated:

V13 = V13, PV13, N
V24 = V24, PV24, N
V31 = V31, PV31, N
V42 = V42, PV42, N

The overall Hall voltage is then

.

The polarity of this Hall voltage indicates the type of material the sample is made of; if it is positive, the material is P-type, and if it is negative, the material is N-type.

The formula given in the background can then be rearranged to show that the sheet density

Note that the strength of the magnetic field B needs to be in units of Wb/cm2 if ns is in cm−2. For instance, if the strength is given in the commonly used units of teslas, it can be converted by multiplying it by 10−4.

Other calculations

Mobility

The resistivity of a semiconductor material can be shown to be [8]

where n and p are the concentration of electrons and holes in the material respectively, and μn and μp are the mobility of the electrons and holes respectively.

Generally, the material is sufficiently doped so that there is a difference of many orders-of-magnitude between the two concentrations, allowing this equation to be simplified to

where nm and μm are the doping level and mobility of the majority carrier respectively.

If we then note that the sheet resistance RS is the resistivity divided by the thickness of the sample, and that the sheet density nS is the doping level multiplied by the thickness, we can divide the equation through by the thickness to get

This can then be rearranged to give the majority carrier mobility in terms of the previously calculated sheet resistance and sheet density:

Footnotes

  1. Koon, D. W.; Knickerbocker, C. J. (1992). "What do you measure when you measure resistivity?". Review of Scientific Instruments. 63 (1): 207–210. Bibcode:1992RScI...63..207K. doi:10.1063/1.1142958.
  2. Oliveira, F. S.; Cipriano, R. B.; da Silva, F. T.; Romão, E. C.; dos Santos, C. a. M. (2020-10-02). "Simple analytical method for determining electrical resistivity and sheet resistance using the van der Pauw procedure". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 16379. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1016379O. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72097-1. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   7532437 . PMID   33009433.
  3. Van der Pauw, L.J. (1958). "A method of measuring specific resistivity and Hall effect of discs of arbitrary shape" (PDF). Philips Research Reports. 13: 1–9.)
  4. Webster, John G (1999). The measurement, instrumentation, and sensors handbook . New York: CRC Press LLC. pp.  43-1. ISBN   3-540-64830-5.
  5. Szymański, K.; Cieśliński, J. L.; Łapiński, K. (2013). "Van der Pauw method on a sample with an isolated hole". Physics Letters A. 377 (8): 651–654. arXiv: 1301.1625 . Bibcode:2013PhLA..377..651S. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.01.008. S2CID   119233024.
  6. Szymański, K.; Łapiński, K.; Cieśliński, J. L. (2015). "Determination of the Riemann modulus and sheet resistance of a sample with a hole by the van der Pauw method". Measurement Science and Technology. 26 (5): 055003. arXiv: 1412.0707 . Bibcode:2015MeScT..26e5003S. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/26/5/055003. S2CID   119306065.
  7. Cieśliński, J. L. (2012). "Modified van der Pauw method based on formulas solvable by the Banach fixed point method". Thin Solid Films. 522: 314–317. arXiv: 1204.0085 . Bibcode:2012TSF...522..314C. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2012.09.018. S2CID   119671849.
  8. Sze, S.M. (2001). Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology. New York: Wiley. p. 53. ISBN   0-471-33372-7.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hall effect</span> Electromagnetic effect in physics

The Hall effect is the production of a potential difference across an electrical conductor that is transverse to an electric current in the conductor and to an applied magnetic field perpendicular to the current. It was discovered by Edwin Hall in 1879.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electrical impedance</span> Opposition of a circuit to a current when a voltage is applied

In electrical engineering, impedance is the opposition to alternating current presented by the combined effect of resistance and reactance in a circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ohm's law</span> Law of electrical current and voltage

Ohm's law states that the electric current through a conductor between two points is directly proportional to the voltage across the two points. Introducing the constant of proportionality, the resistance, one arrives at the three mathematical equations used to describe this relationship:

The quantum Hall effect is a quantized version of the Hall effect which is observed in two-dimensional electron systems subjected to low temperatures and strong magnetic fields, in which the Hall resistance Rxy exhibits steps that take on the quantized values

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electrical resistance and conductance</span> Opposition to the passage of an electric current

The electrical resistance of an object is a measure of its opposition to the flow of electric current. Its reciprocal quantity is electrical conductance, measuring the ease with which an electric current passes. Electrical resistance shares some conceptual parallels with mechanical friction. The SI unit of electrical resistance is the ohm, while electrical conductance is measured in siemens (S).

Electrical resistivity is a fundamental specific property of a material that measures its electrical resistance or how strongly it resists electric current. A low resistivity indicates a material that readily allows electric current. Resistivity is commonly represented by the Greek letter ρ (rho). The SI unit of electrical resistivity is the ohm-metre (Ω⋅m). For example, if a 1 m3 solid cube of material has sheet contacts on two opposite faces, and the resistance between these contacts is 1 Ω, then the resistivity of the material is 1 Ω⋅m.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electromotive force</span> Electrical action produced by a non-electrical source

In electromagnetism and electronics, electromotive force is an energy transfer to an electric circuit per unit of electric charge, measured in volts. Devices called electrical transducers provide an emf by converting other forms of energy into electrical energy. Other electrical equipment also produce an emf, such as batteries, which convert chemical energy, and generators, which convert mechanical energy. This energy conversion is achieved by physical forces applying physical work on electric charges. However, electromotive force itself is not a physical force, and ISO/IEC standards have deprecated the term in favor of source voltage or source tension instead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inductance</span> Property of electrical conductors

Inductance is the tendency of an electrical conductor to oppose a change in the electric current flowing through it. The electric current produces a magnetic field around the conductor. The magnetic field strength depends on the magnitude of the electric current, and follows any changes in the magnitude of the current. From Faraday's law of induction, any change in magnetic field through a circuit induces an electromotive force (EMF) (voltage) in the conductors, a process known as electromagnetic induction. This induced voltage created by the changing current has the effect of opposing the change in current. This is stated by Lenz's law, and the voltage is called back EMF.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skin effect</span> Tendency of AC current flow in a conductors outer layer

In electromagnetism, skin effect is the tendency of an alternating electric current (AC) to become distributed within a conductor such that the current density is largest near the surface of the conductor and decreases exponentially with greater depths in the conductor. It is caused by opposing eddy currents induced by the changing magnetic field resulting from the alternating current. The electric current flows mainly at the skin of the conductor, between the outer surface and a level called the skin depth. Skin depth depends on the frequency of the alternating current; as frequency increases, current flow becomes more concentrated near the surface, resulting in less skin depth. Skin effect reduces the effective cross-section of the conductor and thus increases its effective resistance. At 60 Hz in copper, skin depth is about 8.5 mm. At high frequencies, skin depth becomes much smaller.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Series and parallel circuits</span> Types of electrical circuits

Two-terminal components and electrical networks can be connected in series or parallel. The resulting electrical network will have two terminals, and itself can participate in a series or parallel topology. Whether a two-terminal "object" is an electrical component or an electrical network is a matter of perspective. This article will use "component" to refer to a two-terminal "object" that participates in the series/parallel networks.

In solid-state physics, the electron mobility characterises how quickly an electron can move through a metal or semiconductor when pushed or pulled by an electric field. There is an analogous quantity for holes, called hole mobility. The term carrier mobility refers in general to both electron and hole mobility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Giant magnetoresistance</span> Phenomenom involving the change of conductivity in metallic layers

Giant magnetoresistance (GMR) is a quantum mechanical magnetoresistance effect observed in multilayers composed of alternating ferromagnetic and non-magnetic conductive layers. The 2007 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Albert Fert and Peter Grünberg for the discovery of GMR, which also sets the foundation for the study of spintronics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheet resistance</span> Electrical resistance of a thin film

Sheet resistance, is the resistance of a square piece of a thin material with contacts made to two opposite sides of the square. It is usually a measurement of electrical resistance of thin films that are uniform in thickness. It is commonly used to characterize materials made by semiconductor doping, metal deposition, resistive paste printing, and glass coating. Examples of these processes are: doped semiconductor regions, and the resistors that are screen printed onto the substrates of thick-film hybrid microcircuits.

The Transfer Length Method or the "Transmission Line Model" is a technique used in semiconductor physics and engineering to determine the specific contact resistivity between a metal and a semiconductor. TLM has been developed because with the ongoing device shrinkage in microelectronics the relative contribution of the contact resistance at metal-semiconductor interfaces in a device could not be neglected any more and an accurate measurement method for determining the specific contact resistivity was required.

The De Haas–Van Alphen effect, often abbreviated to DHVA, is a quantum mechanical effect in which the magnetic susceptibility of a pure metal crystal oscillates as the intensity of the magnetic field B is increased. It can be used to determine the Fermi surface of a material. Other quantities also oscillate, such as the electrical resistivity, specific heat, and sound attenuation and speed. It is named after Wander Johannes de Haas and his student Pieter M. van Alphen. The DHVA effect comes from the orbital motion of itinerant electrons in the material. An equivalent phenomenon at low magnetic fields is known as Landau diamagnetism.

An oscillation in the conductivity of a material that occurs at low temperatures in the presence of very intense magnetic fields, the Shubnikov–de Haas effect (SdH) is a macroscopic manifestation of the inherent quantum mechanical nature of matter. It is often used to determine the effective mass of charge carriers, allowing investigators to distinguish among majority and minority carrier populations. The effect is named after Wander Johannes de Haas and Lev Shubnikov.

Spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy (SP-STM) is a type of scanning tunneling microscope (STM) that can provide detailed information of magnetic phenomena on the single-atom scale additional to the atomic topography gained with STM. SP-STM opened a novel approach to static and dynamic magnetic processes as precise investigations of domain walls in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, as well as thermal and current-induced switching of nanomagnetic particles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epstein frame</span> Device to measure magnetic properties

An Epstein frame or Epstein square is a standardised measurement device for measuring the magnetic properties of soft magnetic materials, especially used for testing of electrical steels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microwave cavity</span> Metal structure which confines microwaves or radio waves for resonance

A microwave cavity or radio frequency cavity is a special type of resonator, consisting of a closed metal structure that confines electromagnetic fields in the microwave or RF region of the spectrum. The structure is either hollow or filled with dielectric material. The microwaves bounce back and forth between the walls of the cavity. At the cavity's resonant frequencies they reinforce to form standing waves in the cavity. Therefore, the cavity functions similarly to an organ pipe or sound box in a musical instrument, oscillating preferentially at a series of frequencies, its resonant frequencies. Thus it can act as a bandpass filter, allowing microwaves of a particular frequency to pass while blocking microwaves at nearby frequencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loop-gap resonator</span>

A loop-gap resonator (LGR) is an electromagnetic resonator that operates in the radio and microwave frequency ranges. The simplest LGRs are made from a conducting tube with a narrow slit cut along its length. The LGR dimensions are typically much smaller than the free-space wavelength of the electromagnetic fields at the resonant frequency. Therefore, relatively compact LGRs can be designed to operate at frequencies that are too low to be accessed using, for example, cavity resonators. These structures can have very sharp resonances making them useful for electron spin resonance (ESR) experiments, and precision measurements of electromagnetic material properties.

References