Volkan (newspaper)

Last updated

Volkan
TypeDaily newspaper
Founder(s) Derviş Vahdeti
Editor-in-chiefDerviş Vahdeti
Founded11 December 1908
Political alignmentPan-Islamist
Language Ottoman Turkish
Ceased publication20 April 1909
Headquarters Constantinople

Volkan (Ottoman Turkish: Volcano) was a short-lived daily newspaper published in Constantinople, Ottoman Empire. The paper was in circulation between 1908 and 1909 and was one of the Islamist publications which were launched in the Second Constitutional period. [1]

Contents

History and profile

Volkan was started by Derviş Vahdeti in Constantinople on 11 December 1908. [2] [3] Vahdeti asked for financial support from Sultan Abdulhamit before launching the paper. [4] However, this request was not accepted. [4]

The publisher of Volkan was Derviş Vahdeti. [5] He edited the daily until 20 April 1909 when he was arrested. [3] At the beginning the paper was supportive of the new constitution and relatively liberal. [2] However, following the establishment of the Mohammadan Union by Vahdeti on 5 March 1909 the paper became its organ and an ardent critic of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP). [6] [7] The political program of the Union was featured in the paper on 3 March. [6]

Volkan published the articles by Said Nursî, future leader of the Nur movement. [8] The paper began to feature articles in a militant style over time. [4] It presented a synthesis of mysticism and popular Islam and opposed to the secularism of the government. [9] [10] It also criticized the influence of the minorities and foreign representatives in the Empire. [9] Vahdeti argued in Volkan that the CUP should obey the Islamic principles. [11] [12] The paper also featured anti-Semitic materials written by Derviş Vahdeti and other contributors. [13] All these were in sharp contrast to the ideology of the CUP making the paper a device for the counterrevolution. [9] On 12 April 1909, eight days before its closure, Volkan made a call for a riot against the CUP rule arguing that the CUP leaders should leave the country. [14] The paper produced a total of 110 issues during its run. [15]

Spin-offs

In the 1940s a magazine with same name was published in Istanbul which shared the political stance of the paper. [16]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Young Turks</span> Political reform movement in the Ottoman Empire

Young Turks was a political reform movement in the early 20th century that favored the replacement of the Ottoman Empire's absolute monarchy with a constitutional government. They led a rebellion against the absolute rule of Sultan Abdulhamid II in the 1908 Young Turk Revolution. With this revolution, the Young Turks helped to establish the Second Constitutional Era in the same year, ushering in an era of multi-party democracy for the first time in the country's history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Young Turk Revolution</span> 1908 restoration of constitutional rule in the Ottoman Empire

The Young Turk Revolution was a constitutionalist revolution in the Ottoman Empire. The Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), an organization of the Young Turks movement, forced Sultan Abdul Hamid II to restore the Ottoman Constitution and recall the parliament, which ushered in multi-party politics within the Empire. From the Young Turk Revolution to the Empire's end marks the Second Constitutional Era of the Ottoman Empire's history. More than three decades earlier, in 1876, constitutional monarchy had been established under Abdul Hamid during a period of time known as the First Constitutional Era, which lasted for only two years before Abdul Hamid suspended it and restored autocratic powers to himself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">31 March incident</span> Political crisis in the Ottoman Empire

The 31 March incident was a political crisis within the Ottoman Empire in April 1909, during the Second Constitutional Era. Occurring soon after the 1908 Young Turk Revolution, in which the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) had successfully restored the Constitution and ended the absolute rule of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, it is sometimes referred to as an attempted countercoup or counterrevolution. It consisted of a general uprising against the CUP within Istanbul, largely led by reactionary groups, particularly Islamists opposed to the secularising influence of the CUP and supporters of absolutism, although liberal opponents of the CUP within the Liberty Party also played a lesser role. The crisis ended after eleven days, when troops loyal to the CUP restored order in Istanbul and deposed Abdulhamid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Menemen Incident</span> Revolt of the Islamists against the secularization in Turkey

The Menemen Incident, or Kubilay Incident, refers to a chain of events which occurred in Menemen, a small town north of İzmir in the Aegean Region of Turkey, on 23 December 1930.

Selim M. Deringil is a Turkish academic, and professor of history at Boğaziçi University and at the Lebanese American University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japan–Turkey relations</span> Bilateral relations

Japan–Turkey relations are foreign relations between Japan and Turkey. Japan has an embassy in Ankara and a consulate-general in Istanbul. Turkey has an embassy in Tokyo and a consulate-general in Nagoya. The relationship has been described as "close".

Şerif Mardin was a prominent Turkish sociologist, political scientist, academic and thinker. In a 2008 publication, he was referred to as the "doyen of Turkish sociology."

Marc David Baer is an historian and professor of International History at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

The Action Army, also translated as the Army of Action, was a force formed by elements of the Ottoman Army sympathetic to the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) during the 31 March Incident, sometimes referred to as the 1909 countercoup. Mobilised in Selanik by Mahmud Shevket Pasha, it occupied Istanbul and successfully suppressed the uprising in the 31 March Incident.

Fatma Müge Göçek is a Turkish sociologist and professor at the University of Michigan. She wrote the book Denial of Violence in 2015 concerning the prosectution of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey, for which she received the Mary Douglas award for best book from the American Sociological Association. In 2017, she won a Distinguished Faculty Achievement Award from the university.

Ryan Gingeras is a professor at the Naval Postgraduate School in California and a historian of the late Ottoman Empire.

İttihadism was the ideology of the Committee of Union and Progress, which undertook the Young Turk Revolution in 1908 and ruled the Ottoman Empire from 1913 to 1918.

Bedross Der Matossian is professor of Modern Middle East history and the Hymen Rosenberg Professor in Judaic Studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He is also the vice chair of the Department of History. Der Matossian was born and raised in East Jerusalem. He is a graduate of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where he began his graduate studies in the Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies. He completed his Ph.D. in Middle East History in the Department of Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies at Columbia University in 2008. From 2008 to 2010, he was a lecturer of Middle East History in the Faculty of History at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. For the Spring quarter 2014 he was appointed as the Dumanian Visiting professor in the University of Chicago. His areas of interest include ethnic politics in the Middle East, inter-ethnic violence in the Ottoman Empire, Palestinian history, and the history of Armenian Genocide. Der Matossian was the past president of the Society for Armenian Studies. He is also the series editor of "Armenians in the Modern and Early Modern World". published by I.B.Tauris and Bloomsbury Press. He serves on the Board of Directors of multiple international educational institutions and on the editorial board of multiple journals, the most prominent of which is the flagship journal of the field: International Journal of Middle East Studies (IJMES).

<i>Genç Kalemler</i> Ottoman literary and cultural magazine (1911–1912)

Genç Kalemler was an Ottoman literary and cultural magazine which was one of the earliest nationalist publications in the Ottoman Empire. Murat Belge describes it as a pan-Turkist publication. It was published between April 1911 and October 1912 in Thessaloniki, Ottoman Empire, and was the first Ottoman publication which called for having a national language.

Derviş Vahdeti (1870–1909) was a Cypriot-born religious figure and Islamist politician. He was the leading figure of 31 March incident. He was executed on 19 July 1909 due to his role in the incident.

Mizan was an Ottoman newspaper which existed in the period 1886–1909 with some interruptions. The paper was published in different cities, including Istanbul, Cairo, Paris and Geneva. It was one of the official media outlets of the Committee of Union and Progress.

Robert Dankoff is Professor Emeritus of Ottoman & Turkish Studies, Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at University of Chicago.

Al Jawaib was a newspaper which existed between 1861 and 1884. The paper was founded by Ahmad Faris al-Shidyaq, a Lebanese journalist, and headquartered in Constantinople, Ottoman Empire. Over time it became the most popular Arabic publication in the Empire and made its founder known as a respected journalist and writer. In the last year of its existence the paper was published in Cairo.

İslam Mecmuası was a biweekly political magazine which was published in Constantinople, Ottoman Empire, between 1914 and 1918. It is known as being one of the early publications which attempted to provide a synthesis of the nationalism and Islamism, and its motto was dinli bir hayat, hayatlı bir din. It was sponsored by the Committee of Union and Progress.

Türk was one of the publications published by Ali Kemal, a member of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP). It was based in Cairo and existed between 1903 and 1907.

References

  1. Ceren Sözeri (2019). "The transformation of Turkey's Islamic media and its marriage with neo-liberalism". Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 19 (1): 156. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1579413. S2CID   159250681.
  2. 1 2 Feroz Ahmad (January 1991). "Politics and Islam in Modern Turkey". Middle Eastern Studies . 27 (1): 4. JSTOR   4283411.
  3. 1 2 Talha Murat (2020). The political ideas of Derviş Vahdeti as reflected in Volkan newspaper (1908-1909) (MA thesis). Sabancı University. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 David Farhi (October 1971). "The Şeriat as a Political Slogan: Or the 'Incident of the 31st Mart'". Middle Eastern Studies. 7 (3): 283. doi:10.1080/00263207108700182.
  5. Jeremy Salt (Spring 2015). "Turkey's Counterrevolution: Notes from the Dark Side". Middle East Policy . XXI (1): 123. doi:10.1111/mepo.12118. hdl: 11693/24192 .
  6. 1 2 Feroz Ahmad (July 1968). "The Young Turk Revolution". Journal of Contemporary History . 3 (3): 26. doi:10.1177/002200946800300302. JSTOR   259696. S2CID   150443567.
  7. Christine M. Philliou (2021). Turkey. A Past Against History. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. p. 52. doi:10.1525/9780520382398-fm. ISBN   9780520276390. S2CID   241883383.
  8. Şükran Vahide (2003). "Toward an Intellectual Biography of Said Nursi". In Ibrahim M. Abu-Rabi' (ed.). Islam at the Crossroads: On the Life and Thought of Bediuzzaman Said Nursi. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. p. 6. ISBN   978-0-7914-8691-7.
  9. 1 2 3 Renée Worringer (2014). Ottomans Imagining Japan. East, Middle East, and Non-Western Modernity at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 175. doi:10.1057/9781137384607. ISBN   978-1-137-38460-7.
  10. Stanford J. Shaw; Ezel Kural Shaw (1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 280. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614972. ISBN   9780511614972.
  11. Renée Worringer (2004). "Sickman of Europe or Japan of the Near East?: Constructing Ottoman Modernity in the Hamidian and Young Turk Eras". International Journal of Middle East Studies . 36 (2): 217. doi:10.1017/S0020743804362033. S2CID   156657393.
  12. Kasuya Gen (2006). "The influence of al-Manar on Islamism in Turkey: the case of Mehmed Âkif". In Stephane A. Dudoignon; Komatsu Hisao; Kosugi Yasushi (eds.). Intellectuals in the Modern Islamic World. London: Routledge. p. 72. doi:10.4324/9780203028315-10. ISBN   9780203028315.
  13. Marc David Baer (Fall 2013). "An Enemy Old and New: The Dönme, Anti-Semitism, and Conspiracy Theories in the Ottoman Empire and Turkish Republic". The Jewish Quarterly Review . 103 (4): 531. doi:10.1353/jqr.2013.0033. S2CID   159483845.
  14. Selim Sezer (August 2022). "'A pretty bad reputation': reflections of 'the 31 March incident' on Ottoman Syria, its background, and its immediate consequences". Middle Eastern Studies. 59 (3): 396. doi:10.1080/00263206.2022.2108803. S2CID   251682869.
  15. M. Ertuğrul Düzdağ. "Volkan". Encyclopaedia of Islam . Archived from the original on 22 January 2021.
  16. Gavin D. Brockett (August 2009). "Provincial Newspapers as a Historical Source: Büyük Cihad and the Great Struggle for the Muslim Turkish Nation (1951-53)". International Journal of Middle East Studies . 41 (3): 443. doi: 10.1017/S0020743809091545 . JSTOR   40389256.