Von Baer's laws (embryology)

Last updated
Embryology theories of Ernst Haeckel (following Meckel) and Karl Ernst von Baer compared. Von Baer denied any recapitulation of whole adult forms, though individual structures might be recapitulated. Haeckel vs von Baer.svg
Embryology theories of Ernst Haeckel (following Meckel) and Karl Ernst von Baer compared. Von Baer denied any recapitulation of whole adult forms, though individual structures might be recapitulated.

In developmental biology, von Baer's laws of embryology (or laws of development) are four rules proposed by Karl Ernst von Baer to explain the observed pattern of embryonic development in different species. [1]

Contents

von Baer formulated the laws in his book On the Developmental History of Animals (German : Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere), published in 1828, while working at the University of Königsberg. He specifically intended to rebut Johann Friedrich Meckel's 1808 recapitulation theory. According to that theory, embryos pass through successive stages that represent the adult forms of less complex organisms in the course of development, and that ultimately reflects scala naturae (the great chain of being). [2] von Baer believed that such linear development is impossible. He posited that instead of linear progression, embryos started from one or a few basic forms that are similar in different animals, and then developed in a branching pattern into increasingly different organisms. Defending his ideas, he was also opposed to Charles Darwin's 1859 theory of common ancestry and descent with modification, and particularly to Ernst Haeckel's revised recapitulation theory with its slogan "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny". [3] [4] Darwin was however broadly supportive of von Baer's view of the relationship between embryology and evolution.

The laws

Von Baer described his laws in his book Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere. Beobachtung und Reflexion published in 1828. [5] They are a series of statements generally summarised into four points, as translated by Thomas Henry Huxley in his Scientific Memoirs: [6]

  1. The more general characters of a large group appear earlier in the embryo than the more special characters.
  2. From the most general forms the less general are developed, and so on, until finally the most special arises.
  3. Every embryo of a given animal form, instead of passing through the other forms, rather becomes separated from them.
  4. The embryo of a higher form never resembles any other form, but only its embryo.

Description

Von Baer discovered the blastula (the early hollow ball stage of an embryo) and the development of the notochord (the stiffening rod along the back of all chordates, that forms after the blastula and gastrula stages). From his observations of these stages in different vertebrates, he realised that Johann Friedrich Meckel's recapitulation theory must be wrong. For example, he noticed that the yolk sac is found in birds, but not in frogs. According to the recapitulation theory, such structures should invariably be present in frogs because they were assumed to be at a lower level in the evolutionary tree. Von Baer concluded that while structures like the notochord are recapitulated during embryogenesis, whole organisms are not. [7] He asserted that (as translated):

The embryo successively adds the organs that characterize the animal classes in the ascending scale. When the human embryo, for instance, is but a simple vesicle, it is an infusorian; when it has gained a liver, it is a mussel; with the appearance of the osseous system, it enters the class of fishes; and so forth, until it becomes a mammal and then a human being. [8]

In terms of taxonomic hierarchy, according to von Baer, characters in the embryo are formed in top-to-bottom sequence, first from those of the largest and oldest taxon, the phylum, then in turn class, order, family, genus, and finally species. [7]

Reception

The laws received a mixed appreciation. While they were criticised in detail, they formed the foundation of modern embryology. [1]

Charles Darwin

The most important supporter of von Baer's laws was Charles Darwin. Darwin came across von Baer's laws from the work of Johannes Peter Müller in 1842, and realised that it was a support for his own theory of descent with modification. [9] Darwin was a critique of the recapitulation theory and agreed with von Baer that an adult animal is not reflected by an embryo of another animal, and only embryos of different animals appear similar. [10] He wrote in his Origin of Species (first edition, 1859):

[The] adult [animal] differs from its embryo, owing to variations supervening at a not early age, and being inherited at a corresponding age. This process, whilst it leaves the embryo almost unaltered, continually adds, in the course of successive generations, more and more difference to the adult. Thus the embryo comes to be left as a sort of picture, preserved by nature, of the ancient and less modified condition of each animal. This view may be true, and yet it may never be capable of full proof. [11]

Darwin also said:

It has already been casually remarked that certain organs in the individual, which when mature become widely different and serve for different purposes, are in the embryo exactly alike. The embryos, also, of distinct animals within the same class are often strikingly similar: a better proof of this cannot be given, than a circumstance mentioned by Agassiz, namely, that having forgotten to ticket the embryo of some vertebrate animal, he cannot now tell whether it be that of a mammal, bird, or reptile. [12]

Darwin's attribution to Louis Agassiz was a mistake, [13] and was corrected in the third edition as von Baer. [14] He further explained in the later editions of Origin of Species (from third to sixth editions), and wrote:

It might be thought that the amount of change which the various parts and organs [of vertebrates] undergo in their development from the embryo to maturity would suffice as a standard of comparison; but there are cases, as with certain parasitic crustaceans, in which several parts of the structure become less perfect, so that the mature animal cannot be called higher than its larva. Von Baer's standard seems the most widely applicable and the best, namely, the amount of differentiation of the different parts (in the adult state, as I should be inclined to add) and their specialisation for different functions. [15] [16]

Even so, von Baer was a vociferous anti-Darwinist, although he believed in the common ancestry of species. [17] Devoting much of his scholarly effort to criticising natural selection, his criticism culminated with his last work Über Darwins Lehre ("On Darwin's Doctrine"), published in the year of his death in 1876. [18]

Later biologists

The British zoologist Adam Sedgwick studied the developing embryos of dogfish and chicken, and in 1894 noted a series of differences, such as the green yolk in the dogfish and yellow yolk in the chicken, absence of embryonic rim in chick embryos, absence of blastopore in dogfish, and differences in the gill slits and gill clefts. He concluded:

There is no stage of development in which the unaided eye would fail to distinguish between them with ease... A blind man could distinguish between them. [19]

Modern biologists still debate the validity of the laws. In one line of argument, it is said that although every detail of von Baer's law may not work, the basic assumption that early developmental stages of animals are highly conserved is a biological fact. [20] But an opposition says that there are conserved genetic conditions in embryos, but not the genetic events that govern the development. [21] One example on the problem of von Baer's law is the formation of notochord before heart. This is due to the fact that heart is present in many invertebrates, which never have notochord. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ernst Haeckel</span> German biologist, philosopher, physician, and artist (1834–1919)

Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel was a German zoologist, naturalist, eugenicist, philosopher, physician, professor, marine biologist and artist. He discovered, described and named thousands of new species, mapped a genealogical tree relating all life forms and coined many terms in biology, including ecology, phylum, phylogeny, and Protista. Haeckel promoted and popularised Charles Darwin's work in Germany and developed the influential but no longer widely held recapitulation theory claiming that an individual organism's biological development, or ontogeny, parallels and summarises its species' evolutionary development, or phylogeny.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embryo drawing</span> Illustration of embryos in their developmental sequence

Embryo drawing is the illustration of embryos in their developmental sequence. In plants and animals, an embryo develops from a zygote, the single cell that results when an egg and sperm fuse during fertilization. In animals, the zygote divides repeatedly to form a ball of cells, which then forms a set of tissue layers that migrate and fold to form an early embryo. Images of embryos provide a means of comparing embryos of different ages, and species. To this day, embryo drawings are made in undergraduate developmental biology lessons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl Ernst von Baer</span> Baltic German scientist (1792–1876)

Karl Ernst Ritter von Baer Edler von Huthorn was a Baltic German scientist and explorer. Baer was a naturalist, biologist, geologist, meteorologist, geographer, and is considered a, or the, founding father of embryology. He was a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a co-founder of the Russian Geographical Society, and the first president of the Russian Entomological Society, making him one of the most distinguished Baltic German scientists.

The theory of recapitulation, also called the biogenetic law or embryological parallelism—often expressed using Ernst Haeckel's phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"—is an historical hypothesis that the development of the embryo of an animal, from fertilization to gestation or hatching (ontogeny), goes through stages resembling or representing successive adult stages in the evolution of the animal's remote ancestors (phylogeny). It was formulated in the 1820s by Étienne Serres based on the work of Johann Friedrich Meckel, after whom it is also known as Meckel–Serres law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ontogeny</span> Origination and development of an organism

Ontogeny is the origination and development of an organism, usually from the time of fertilization of the egg to adult. The term can also be used to refer to the study of the entirety of an organism's lifespan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionary developmental biology</span> Comparison of organism developmental processes

Evolutionary developmental biology is a field of biological research that compares the developmental processes of different organisms to infer how developmental processes evolved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homology (biology)</span> Shared ancestry between a pair of structures or genes in different taxa

In biology, homology is similarity due to shared ancestry between a pair of structures or genes in different taxa. A common example of homologous structures is the forelimbs of vertebrates, where the wings of bats and birds, the arms of primates, the front flippers of whales, and the forelegs of four-legged vertebrates like dogs and crocodiles are all derived from the same ancestral tetrapod structure. Evolutionary biology explains homologous structures adapted to different purposes as the result of descent with modification from a common ancestor. The term was first applied to biology in a non-evolutionary context by the anatomist Richard Owen in 1843. Homology was later explained by Charles Darwin's theory of evolution in 1859, but had been observed before this, from Aristotle onwards, and it was explicitly analysed by Pierre Belon in 1555.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embryology</span> Branch of biology studying prenatal biology

Embryology is the branch of animal biology that studies the prenatal development of gametes, fertilization, and development of embryos and fetuses. Additionally, embryology encompasses the study of congenital disorders that occur before birth, known as teratology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparative anatomy</span> Study of similarities and differences in the anatomy of different species

Comparative anatomy is the study of similarities and differences in the anatomy of different species. It is closely related to evolutionary biology and phylogeny.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ectoderm</span> Outer germ layer of embryonic development

The ectoderm is one of the three primary germ layers formed in early embryonic development. It is the outermost layer, and is superficial to the mesoderm and endoderm. It emerges and originates from the outer layer of germ cells. The word ectoderm comes from the Greek ektos meaning "outside", and derma meaning "skin".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Notochord</span> Flexible rod-shaped structure in all chordates

In zoology and developmental anatomy, the notochord is an elastic, rod-like anatomical structure found in many deuterostomal animals. A notochord is one of five synapomorphies, or characteristics used to define a species as a chordate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orthogenesis</span> Hypothesis that organisms have an innate tendency to evolve towards some goal

Orthogenesis, also known as orthogenetic evolution, progressive evolution, evolutionary progress, or progressionism, is an obsolete biological hypothesis that organisms have an innate tendency to evolve in a definite direction towards some goal (teleology) due to some internal mechanism or "driving force". According to the theory, the largest-scale trends in evolution have an absolute goal such as increasing biological complexity. Prominent historical figures who have championed some form of evolutionary progress include Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, and Henri Bergson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gavin de Beer</span> British evolutionary embryologist (1899–1972)

Sir Gavin Rylands de Beer was a British evolutionary embryologist, known for his work on heterochrony as recorded in his 1930 book Embryos and Ancestors. He was director of the Natural History Museum, London, president of the Linnean Society of London, and a winner of the Royal Society's Darwin Medal for his studies on evolution.

The pharyngula is a stage in the embryonic development of vertebrates. At this stage, the embryos of all vertebrates are similar, having developed features typical of vertebrates, such as the beginning of a spinal cord. Named by William Ballard, the pharyngula stage follows the blastula, gastrula and neurula stages.

<i>Ontogeny and Phylogeny</i> Book by Stephen Jay Gould

Ontogeny and Phylogeny is a 1977 book on evolution by Stephen Jay Gould, in which the author explores the relationship between embryonic development (ontogeny) and biological evolution (phylogeny). Unlike his many popular books of essays, it was a technical book, and over the following decades it was influential in stimulating research into heterochrony, which had been neglected since Ernst Haeckel's theory that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny had been largely discredited. This helped to create the field of evolutionary developmental biology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Étienne Serres</span> French physician and biologist (1786–1868)

Antoine Étienne Renaud Augustin Serres was a French physician and embryologist. He has been considered a pioneer of neurology. He was among the first to formulate the recapitulation theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of evolutionary thought</span>

Evolutionary thought, the recognition that species change over time and the perceived understanding of how such processes work, has roots in antiquity—in the ideas of the ancient Greeks, Romans, Chinese, Church Fathers as well as in medieval Islamic science. With the beginnings of modern biological taxonomy in the late 17th century, two opposed ideas influenced Western biological thinking: essentialism, the belief that every species has essential characteristics that are unalterable, a concept which had developed from medieval Aristotelian metaphysics, and that fit well with natural theology; and the development of the new anti-Aristotelian approach to modern science: as the Enlightenment progressed, evolutionary cosmology and the mechanical philosophy spread from the physical sciences to natural history. Naturalists began to focus on the variability of species; the emergence of palaeontology with the concept of extinction further undermined static views of nature. In the early 19th century prior to Darwinism, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829) proposed his theory of the transmutation of species, the first fully formed theory of evolution.

Comparative embryology is the branch of embryology that compares and contrasts embryos of different species, showing how all animals are related.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biological rules</span> Generalized principle to describe patterns observed in living organisms

A biological rule or biological law is a generalized law, principle, or rule of thumb formulated to describe patterns observed in living organisms. Biological rules and laws are often developed as succinct, broadly applicable ways to explain complex phenomena or salient observations about the ecology and biogeographical distributions of plant and animal species around the world, though they have been proposed for or extended to all types of organisms. Many of these regularities of ecology and biogeography are named after the biologists who first described them.

In Embryology a phylotypic stage or phylotypic period is a particular developmental stage or developmental period during mid-embryogenesis where embryos of related species within a phylum express the highest degree of morphological and molecular resemblance. Recent molecular studies in various plant and animal species were able to quantify the expression of genes covering crucial stages of embryo development and found that during the morphologically defined phylotypic period the evolutionary oldest genes, genes with similar temporal expression patterns, and genes under strongest purifying selection are most active throughout the phylotypic period.

References

  1. 1 2 Abzhanov, Arhat (2013). "von Baer's law for the ages: lost and found principles of developmental evolution". Trends in Genetics. 29 (12): 712–722. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.09.004. PMID   24120296. S2CID   9158143.
  2. ↑ Opitz, John M.; Schultka, Rüdiger; Göbbel, Luminita (2006). "Meckel on developmental pathology". American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 140A (2): 115–128. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31043. PMID   16353245. S2CID   30513424.
  3. ↑ Garstang, Walter (1922). "The Theory of Recapitulation: A Critical Re-statement of the Biogenetic Law". Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology. 35 (232): 81–101. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1922.tb00464.x.
  4. ↑ Løvtrup, Søren (1978). "On von Baerian and Haeckelian Recapitulation". Systematic Zoology. 27 (3): 348–352. doi:10.2307/2412887. JSTOR   2412887.
  5. ↑ Baer, Karl Ernst von (1828). Über Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere. Beobachtung und Reflexion. Königsberg: Bei den Gebrüdern Bornträger. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.6303.
  6. ↑ Huxley, Thomas Henry (1853). Henfrey, Arthur (ed.). Scientific memoirs, selected from the transactions of foreign academies of science, and from foreign journals. Natural history. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.28029.
  7. 1 2 Matthen, Mohan; Stephens, Christopher (2007). Philosophy of Biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 444–445. ISBN   978-0-080-47124-2.
  8. ↑ Ospovat, D. (1976). "The influence of Karl Ernst von Baer's embryology, 1828–1859: A reappraisal in light of Richard Owen's and William B. Carpenter's "Palaeontological application of 'von Baer's law'"". Journal of the History of Biology. 9 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1007/BF00129171. PMID   11615631. S2CID   40800347.
  9. ↑ Gilbert, Scott F. (2000). Developmental Biology. Sinauer Associates. pp. Online. ISBN   978-0878932436.
  10. ↑ Barnes, M. Elizabeth (2014). "Karl Ernst von Baer's Laws of Embryology". The Embryo Project Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2020-10-04.
  11. ↑ Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray. p. 338.
  12. ↑ Darwin, Charles (1859). On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray. pp. 438–439.
  13. ↑ Rogers, James Allen (1973). "The Reception of Darwin's Origin of Species by Russian Scientists". Isis. 64 (4): 484–503. doi:10.1086/351177. JSTOR   229645. PMID   4593473. S2CID   36129302.
  14. ↑ Darwin, Charles (1861). The Origin of Species (3 ed.). London: John Murray. pp. 470–471.
  15. ↑ Darwin, Charles (1861). On the Origin of Species. John Murray. p. 133.
  16. ↑ Darwin, Charles (1872). The Origin of Species (6 ed.). London: John Murray. p. 97.
  17. ↑ Dagg, Joachim L.; Derry, J. F. (2020). "Charles Darwin did not mislead Joseph Hooker in their 1881 Correspondence about Leopold von Buch and Karl Ernst von Baer". Annals of Science. 77 (3): 349–365. doi:10.1080/00033790.2020.1790659. PMID   32755351. S2CID   221016353.
  18. ↑ Vucinich, Alexander (1988). Darwin in Russian Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 93. ISBN   978-0-52-006283-2.
  19. ↑ Sedgwick, Adam (1894). "Memoirs: On the Law of Development commonly known as von Baer's Law; and on the Significance of Ancestral Rudiments in Embryonic Development". Journal of Cell Science. s2-36 (141): 35–52. doi: 10.1242/jcs.s2-36.141.35 .
  20. ↑ Garfield, David A.; Wray, Gregory A. (2009). "Comparative embryology without a microscope: using genomic approaches to understand the evolution of development". Journal of Biology. 8 (7): 65. doi: 10.1186/jbiol161 . PMC   2736668 . PMID   19664180.
  21. ↑ Kalinka, Alex T.; Tomancak, Pavel (2012). "The evolution of early animal embryos: conservation or divergence?". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 27 (7): 385–393. Bibcode:2012TEcoE..27..385K. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.03.007. ISSN   1872-8383. PMID   22520868.
  22. ↑ Løvtrup, Søren (1987). "Phylogenesis, ontogenesis and evolution". Italian Journal of Zoology. 54 (3): 199–208. doi: 10.1080/11250008709355584 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.