Water privatization in the United States

Last updated

In the latter half of the 19th century, private water systems began to be a part of municipal services. [1] As of 2011, over three quarters of US local governments surveyed by the ICMA (International City/County Management Association) provide water distribution entirely with public employees. Over two thirds of municipalities provide water treatment publicly, and over half provide sewage collection and treatment publicly. These rates have remained relatively stable over time. [2]

Contents

The increased interest in privatizing public water services is an outgrowth of political forces and public policies favoring privatization of public services generally, and water resources specifically. A growing number of contracts to privatize public water services is an indicator that privatization has become increasingly attractive to many public water institutions. State legal authority for public entities to privatize water systems has aided the privatization trend. States have enacted statutes authorizing municipalities and other public entities to enter into contracts with private entities to supply water to the public. [3]

Water corporations have identified United States public systems as potentially profitable. These are United Water, a subsidiary of the French company Suez Environment, American Water, and Siemens from Germany which acquired US Filter Corps from French Veolia Environment and runs it under the Siemens name. [3]

Criticism

In "Water Privatization Trends in the United States: Human Rights, National Security, and Public Stewardship", Craig Anthony Arnold argues that there is a lack of incentive for private water companies to carry out improvements or maintenance in public water systems that will have lasting benefits beyond their contract term. [3]

There are other criticisms of privatization outside the classic argument of "public" versus "private", the most of fundamental example being the claim that privatization does not lead to cost savings. Mildred Warner, a professor in the Department of City and Regional Planning at Cornell University and expert of government service delivery and privatization, completed a comprehensive analysis of all published water distribution studies published between 1960 and 2009. She and her colleagues found no evidence for cost savings. [2]

Other criticisms come from a potential loss of equality provided by the privatization of water. In the early 19th century, the majority of the water supply in the United States was privatized. However, there were problems with privatization at this time. Water provisions were focused more towards wealthier communities and the poorer areas were sometimes ignored. Additionally, the private companies tended to focus more on profit maximization than on the quality and quantity of service provided because water is a natural monopoly. Because of this, by 2000 only 15% of water supply remained privatized. [4] [5]

There have also been multiple examples of privatization contracts being terminated by the government. One such contract was a 20-year contract in Atlanta with United Water in 1998. This contract was terminated after 4 years due to poor quality supplied and mismanagement issues. [3]

Another argument against privatization in the U.S. is for security reasons. Arnold writes, "The critical dependence of the U.S. public on public water supply systems, surface waters, groundwater, and water infrastructure heighten the vulnerability of these systems not only to conflict and scarcity but also to terrorism and intentional harm. Therefore, we require savvy, farreaching, effective government oversight of our water supplies and facilities for their security. Decentralized private control of waters and water systems complicates the government's attempts to fulfill this responsibility." [3]

Furthermore, some argue that the privatization of water gives up governmental control of a good that is essential to life and is ethically wrong. Commodifying water through privatization makes it a good to be bought and sold rather than a good that people have a natural right to, which has led to a loss of access to this resource in areas. [5] [6]

Support

Private water companies have existed in the United States for more than 200 years and number in the thousands today. The private water industry serves more than 73 million Americans. [7] According to the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC), more than 2,000 facilities operate in public-private partnership contract arrangements. [8] Data from Public Works Financing shows that 5,391 private water contracts came up for renewal from 2000 to 2015 and 97 percent were renewed within the industry. [9] [10]

Within the United States, there is widespread, bipartisan support for the role of private water in improving infrastructure and delivering safe drinking water. The U.S. Conference of Mayors Urban Water Council, [11] the National League of Cities, [12] the Brookings Institution, [13] [14] and the White House have said that private water companies provide proven and important options for municipalities facing urgent water infrastructure and operational needs. [15]

Private water companies enable communities to gain access to needed capital for infrastructure investment. [16] [17] [18] Each year, private water companies invest billions of dollars to improve water systems, conduct research, and develop new technologies. [19] [20] A water system run by the private sector can be more efficient and cost effective. [21] [22] Libertarian organizations such as the Reason Foundation have argued that privatizing water systems increases environmental compliance and reduces bureaucratic inefficiency, citing how studies have shown privatizing utility ownership or management reduces costs. [23] [24] In addition, private utilities contribute via taxes to the economies of municipalities they serve. [25]

The largest private water utilities have fewer EPA violations, fines, or work orders when it comes to compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act. An American Water Intelligence analysis of EPA data from 2001 to 2011 shows that NAWC members had 0.09 EPA enforcement actions per 1 million customers, while all other water operators had 30.03 EPA enforcement actions per 1 million customers. [26] According to an analysis of EPA data from 2010 to 2013, publicly operated water systems are more likely to incur health violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act than privately operated water systems. [27] According to Governing , public water employees are more likely to suffer an injury or illness on the job than private sector water employees. [28]

Impact of private sector participation

In 2004 The University of Michigan's Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy published a policy report [29] regarding privatization, the pros and cons, and its impact on local and state government in the United States. A summary of their conclusions follows:

"While many states and localities are turning to privatization as a way to provide services to their citizens, surprisingly little is known about these choices. Much of the debate over privatization pays little attention to the rationales and consequences of private versus public service provision." [29]

Work crew digs water line Work crew digs water line.JPG
Work crew digs water line

Cases of water privatization

Atlanta

In January 1999, the city of Atlanta, Georgia, entered into a 20-year contract with United Water Resources Inc. to run its drinking water system. On January 24, 2003, because hundreds of residents had complained of brown water and poor service since the city agreed to the privatization contract, Atlanta terminated its contract with United Water. At the time, this was the nation's largest public-private partnership contract. Mayor Shirley Franklin, who took office after the deal was signed, canceled the contract. The water problems of Atlanta and Georgia have extended far beyond how to run municipal systems to problems of water scarcity and Conflict with neighboring towns and states.(see Tri-state water dispute) [30]

Atlanta Georgia has found itself in a water crisis due to legal and political institutions' accommodation of consumer demand for both water and energy produced by water: a growing population particularly in the sprawling Atlanta metropolitan area, recreational users of water, agricultural irrigators, power generators, and industries like pulp and paper mills, textiles, chemical manufacturing facilities, and the mining industry. [3]

Detroit

Detroit Landsat Image Large Detroit Landsat.jpg
Detroit Landsat Image

The experiences in Detroit provide some perspective on what happens with corrupt government related to public or private participation. Public officials were indicted for illegally steering public contracts to specific private companies. These companies also were accused of questionable billing practices. According to the Detroit Free Press, The sprawling water system (Detroit's), with more than 4 million customers and annual revenues of more than $800 million, stretches from Lake Huron in north eastern Michigan to the town of Ypsilanti Michigan, a Detroit suburb to the south west of Detroit. This sprawling water system has provided a "flash point between the city and the suburbs because Detroit owns the system although about three-quarters of the customers now live in the suburbs." Also according to the Detroit Free Press, suburban leaders have long criticized the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department for its annual rate increases and what many considered questionable contracting practices. Due to the horse trading, shoddy contracting practices, and other forms of corruption this Detroit case may be a good example of government failure in the water system arena. [31]

As of 24 June 2014, the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department is

"an estimated $5 billion in debt and has been the subject of privatization talks ... [it] says half of its 323,000 accounts are delinquent and has begun turning off the taps of those who do not pay bills that total above $150 or that are 60 days late. Since March, up to 3,000 account holders have had their water cut off every week." [32]

Activists have criticized these actions, saying "Detroit is trying to push through a private takeover of its water system at the expense of basic rights." The Blue Planet Project has filed a "submission to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation regarding cutting off water to Detroit residents. [32]

Emmaus, Pennsylvania

On July 6, 2005, the Emmaus Borough Council voted in a 3-2 vote to authorize its Water Committee to work with the borough's consultant to draft an agreement of sale for its water system. Citizens had been especially concerned that if the borough chose to follow the consultant's advice to "monetize the system," that the system would be sold to a multinational corporation, as was an increasing trend throughout the region. Many Emmaus residents organized themselves under the group EFLOW ("Emmaus for Locally Owned Water"), and through a combination of letter-writing, petitioning and public comment at council meetings, in early September 2005 the council voted to take water privatization off the table of options. This controversy garnered regional and national attention, with anti-privatization non-profits such as Public Citizen noting the debate and outcome. [33]

Indianapolis

On August 26, 2011, the city of Indianapolis transferred its water and waste water systems to a non-profit charitable trust known as Citizens Energy Group, for more than $1.9 billion. Under the terms of the transfer, the City transferred all of the debt of those two systems to Citizens and received more than $500 million, which the city has used to fund upgrades to transportation infrastructure, improvements to city parks, and removal of abandoned homes.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

The vast majority of passenger travel in the United States occurs by automobile for shorter distances and airplane or railroad for longer distances. Most cargo in the U.S. is transported by, in descending order, railroad, truck, pipeline, or boat; air shipping is typically used only for perishables and premium express shipments. Transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Environmental Protection Agency</span> U.S. federal government agency

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is an independent agency of the United States government tasked with environmental protection matters. President Richard Nixon proposed the establishment of EPA on July 9, 1970; it began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order. The order establishing the EPA was ratified by committee hearings in the House and Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infrastructure</span> Facilities and systems serving society

Infrastructure is the set of facilities and systems that serve a country, city, or other area, and encompasses the services and facilities necessary for its economy, households and firms to function. Infrastructure is composed of public and private physical structures such as roads, railways, bridges, tunnels, water supply, sewers, electrical grids, and telecommunications. In general, infrastructure has been defined as "the physical components of interrelated systems providing commodities and services essential to enable, sustain, or enhance societal living conditions" and maintain the surrounding environment.

A public–private partnership is a long-term arrangement between a government and private sector institutions. Typically, it involves private capital financing government projects and services up-front, and then drawing revenues from taxpayers and/or users for profit over the course of the PPP contract. Public–private partnerships have been implemented in multiple countries and are primarily used for infrastructure projects. Although they are not necessary, PPPs have been employed for building, equipping, operating and maintaining schools, hospitals, transport systems, and water and sewerage systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clean Water Act</span> 1972 U.S. federal law regulating water pollution

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal law in the United States governing water pollution. Its objective is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters; recognizing the responsibilities of the states in addressing pollution and providing assistance to states to do so, including funding for publicly owned treatment works for the improvement of wastewater treatment; and maintaining the integrity of wetlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply</span> Provision of water by public utilities, commercial organisations or others

Water supply is the provision of water by public utilities, commercial organisations, community endeavors or by individuals, usually via a system of pumps and pipes. Public water supply systems are crucial to properly functioning societies. These systems are what supply drinking water to populations around the globe. Aspects of service quality include continuity of supply, water quality and water pressure. The institutional responsibility for water supply is arranged differently in different countries and regions. It usually includes issues surrounding policy and regulation, service provision and standardization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water privatization</span>

Water privatization is short for private sector participations in the provision of water services and sanitation. Water privatization has a variable history in which its popularity and favorability has fluctuated in the market and politics. One of the common forms of privatization is public–private partnerships (PPPs). PPPs allow for a mix between public and private ownership and/or management of water and sanitation sources and infrastructure. Privatization, as proponents argue, may not only increase efficiency and service quality but also increase fiscal benefits. There are different forms of regulation in place for current privatization systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National League of Cities</span> Advocacy organisation in United States

The National League of Cities (NLC) is an advocacy organization in the United States that represents the country's 19,495 cities, towns, and villages along with 49 state municipal leagues. Created in 1924, it has evolved into a leading membership organization providing education, research, support, and advocacy to city leaders across America. Based in Washington, D.C., it is considered part of the 'Big Seven', a group of organizations that represent local and state government in the United States. The NLC provides training and other resources to municipal officials, holds conferences, and advocates to the federal government on behalf of cities, towns and villages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Safe Drinking Water Act</span> Principal federal law in the United States intended to ensure safe drinking water for the public

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) is the principal federal law in the United States intended to ensure safe drinking water for the public. Pursuant to the act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to set standards for drinking water quality and oversee all states, localities, and water suppliers that implement the standards.

Water supply and sanitation in the United States involves a number of issues including water scarcity, pollution, a backlog of investment, concerns about the affordability of water for the poorest, and a rapidly retiring workforce. Increased variability and intensity of rainfall as a result of climate change is expected to produce both more severe droughts and flooding, with potentially serious consequences for water supply and for pollution from combined sewer overflows. Droughts are likely to particularly affect the 66 percent of Americans whose communities depend on surface water. As for drinking water quality, there are concerns about disinfection by-products, lead, perchlorates, PFAS and pharmaceutical substances, but generally drinking water quality in the U.S. is good.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Argentina</span>

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Argentina is characterized by relatively low tariffs, mostly reasonable service quality, low levels of metering and high levels of consumption for those with access to services. At the same time, according to the WHO, 21% of the total population remains without access to house connections and 52% of the urban population do not have access to sewerage. The responsibility for operating and maintaining water and sanitation services rests with 19 provincial water and sewer companies, more than 100 municipalities and more than 950 cooperatives, the latter operating primarily in small towns. Among the largest water and sewer companies are Agua y Saneamientos Argentinos (AYSA) and Aguas Bonarenses S.A. (ABSA), both operating in Greater Buenos Aires, Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe, and Aguas Cordobesas SA, all of them now publicly owned. In 2008 there were still a few private concessions, such as Aguas de Salta SA, which is majority-owned by Argentine investors, and Obras Sanitarias de Mendoza (OSM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Rwanda</span> Water supply and sanitation in Rwanda

Water supply and sanitation in Rwanda is characterized by a clear government policy and significant donor support. In response to poor sustainability of rural water systems and poor service quality, in 2002 local government in the Northern Byumba Province contracted out service provision to the local private sector in a form of public–private partnership. Support for public-private partnerships became a government policy in 2004 and locally initiated public-private partnerships spread rapidly, covering 25% of rural water systems as of 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clean Water State Revolving Fund</span> USEPA lending program for water quality

The Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) is a self-perpetuating loan assistance authority for water quality improvement projects in the United States. The fund is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency and state agencies. The CWSRF, which replaced the Clean Water Act Construction Grants program, provides loans for the construction of municipal wastewater facilities and implementation of nonpoint source pollution control and estuary protection projects. Congress established the fund in the Water Quality Act of 1987. Since inception, cumulative assistance has surpassed 153.6 billion dollars as of 2021, and is continuing to grow through interest earnings, principal repayments, and leveraging.

Remunicipalisation commonly refers to the return of previously privatised water supply and sanitation services to municipal authorities. It also encompasses regional or national initiatives.

Privatization is the process of transferring ownership of a business, enterprise, agency, charity or public service from the public sector or common use to the private sector or to private non-profit organizations. In a broader sense, privatization refers to transfer of any government function to the private sector - including governmental functions like revenue collection and law enforcement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public–private partnerships in India</span>

The public–private partnership is a commercial legal relationship defined by the Government of India in 2011 as "an arrangement between a statutory / government owned entity on one side and a private sector entity on the other, for the provision of public assets and/or public services, through investments being made and/or management being undertaken by the private sector entity, for a specified period of time, where there is well defined allocation of risk between the private sector and the public entity and the private entity receives performance linked payments that conform to specified and pre-determined performance standards, measurable by the public entity or its representative".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flint water crisis</span> Contamination by lead of water supply in Flint, Michigan

The Flint water crisis was a public health crisis that started in 2014 after the drinking water for the city of Flint, Michigan was contaminated with lead and possibly Legionella bacteria. In April 2014, during a financial crisis, state-appointed emergency manager Darnell Earley changed Flint's water source from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department to the Flint River. Residents complained about the taste, smell, and appearance of the water. Officials failed to apply corrosion inhibitors to the water, which resulted in lead from aging pipes leaching into the water supply, exposing around 100,000 residents to elevated lead levels. A pair of scientific studies confirmed that lead contamination was present in the water supply. The city switched back to the Detroit water system on October 16, 2015. It later signed a 30-year contract with the new Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) on November 22, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public–private partnership in Canada</span> Alternative service delivery

Public–private partnership in Canada is a form of alternative service delivery that involves a formal, collaborative arrangement between the public and private sectors, typically of a long-term nature. Public–private partnerships are commonly used for infrastructure projects related to healthcare, transportation, the environment, justice and correction, recreation and culture, and education.

Public–private partnerships are cooperative arrangements between two or more public and private sectors, typically of a long-term nature. Public private partnerships is the economic control fascist regimes use to manipulate & control the population. In the United States, they mostly took the form of toll roads concessions, community post offices and urban renewal projects. In recent years, there has been interest in expanding P3s to multiple infrastructure projects, such as schools, universities, government buildings, waste and water. Reasons for expanding public-private partnership in the United States were initially cost-cutting and concerns about Public debt. In the early 2000s, P3s were implemented sporadically by different States and municipalities with little federal guidance. During Obama's second term, multiple policies were adopted to facilitate P3 projects, and Congress passed bills in that direction with overwhelming bipartisan support. My Brother's Keeper Challenge is an example of a public–private partnership. Some Private-public partnerships were carried out without incident, while others have attracted much controversy.

References

  1. ↑ Gary Wolffe & Meena Palaniappan (January 2004). "Public or Private Water Management? Cutting the Gordian Knot" (PDF).
  2. 1 2 Warner, Mildred E. (2009). "Water Privatization Does Not Yield Cost Savings" (PDF). William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  3. ↑ Cotta, Sabrina A. (2012-11-01). "Privatization and water service provision in the United States: a recommendation for expanded oversight and the development and adoption of best practices". Water International. 37 (7): 818–830. doi:10.1080/02508060.2012.731719. ISSN   0250-8060. S2CID   155965135.
  4. 1 2 MELOSI, MARTIN V. (2011-01-01). Precious Commodity: Providing Water for America's Cities. University of Pittsburgh Press. ISBN   9780822961413. JSTOR   j.ctt7zwbjx.
  5. ↑ Gouvello, Bernard de; Scott, Christopher A. (2012-03-01). "Has water privatization peaked? The future of public water governance". Water International. 37 (2): 87–90. doi:10.1080/02508060.2012.663614. ISSN   0250-8060. S2CID   153687534.
  6. ↑ Deane, Michael (May 11, 2016). "Solving Complex Water Challenges Requires Multiple Solutions". The Huffington Post. Retrieved June 9, 2016.
  7. ↑ "NAWC Public Private Partnerships". National Association of Water Companies. April 2012.
  8. ↑ "Renewals vs. Lost Gov't. Contracts 1999-2009". Public Works Financing. 247: 9. March 2010.
  9. ↑ "Renewals vs. Lost Gov't contracts, 2006-2015". Public Works Financing. 313: 4. March 2016.
  10. ↑ "Mayor's Guide to Water and Wastewater Partnership Service Agreements: Terms and Conditions" (PDF). United States Conference of Mayors. April 25, 2005. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  11. ↑ Nabers, Mary Scott (November 3, 2014). "Public-Private Partnerships: An Attractive Funding Option for Public Projects" . Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  12. ↑ Engel, Eduardo; Fischer, Ronald; Galetovic, Alexander (February 2011). "Public-Private Partnerships to Revamp U.S. Infrastructure". Brookings Institution . Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  13. ↑ Istrate, Emilia; Puentes, Robert (December 2011). "Project on State and Metropolitan Innovation: Moving Forward on Public Private Partnerships: U.S. and International Experience with PPP Units" (PDF). Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  14. ↑ "Presidential Memorandum -- Expanding Public-Private Collaboration on Infrastructure Development and Financing". White House Office of the Press Secretary. July 17, 2014. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  15. ↑ "Global Infrastructure: Delivering Water Infrastructure using Private Finance" (PDF). KPMG . Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  16. ↑ "Response to Congress on Privatization of Wastewater Facilities". United States Environmental Protection Agency. July 1997. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  17. ↑ Moore, Adrian. "Long-Term Partnerships in Water and Sewar Utilities: Economic, Political, and Policy Implications". Reason Public Policy Institute. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  18. ↑ "Fact Sheet: Working Together to Build a Sustainable Water Future". White House Office of the Press Secretary. March 22, 2016. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  19. ↑ "Aqua America, Inc. 2015 Annual Report" (PDF). Aqua America . Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  20. ↑ Glinzak, Louie (March 31, 2011). "The Case for Water Privatization". Acton Institute. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  21. ↑ "Establishing Public-Private Partnerships for Water and Wastewater Systems: A Blueprint for Success" (PDF). Water Partnership Council. 2003. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  22. ↑ Stossel, John (May 25, 2016). "Private Is Better: Anything government can do, the private sector can do better. It can even do things government can't". Reason.com. Retrieved June 2, 2016.
  23. ↑ Moore, Adrian (November 21, 2003). "Why Water Privatization Adds Up: 1 in 6 Americans gets drinking water from privately owned systems". Reason.org. Reason Foundation. Retrieved June 2, 2016.
  24. ↑ Segerfeldt, Fredrik (2005). Water for Sale: How Business and the Market Can Resolve the World's Water Crisis. Cato Institute. ISBN   9781930865761 . Retrieved June 2, 2016.
  25. ↑ "Investor-owned water firms boast sterling SDWA record: EPA data shows private utilities are practically absent from list of serious SDWA violators" (PDF). American Water Intelligence. p. 15. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  26. ↑ Konisky, David; Teodoro, Manny (November 6, 2014). "Panel Paper: When Governments Regulate Governments". Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  27. ↑ Maciag, Mike (November 19, 2013). "The Most Dangerous Government Jobs and Why They're Riskier Than the Private Sector". Governing . ISSN   0894-3842 . Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  28. 1 2 Elisabeth Gerber; Christianne Hall & James Hines j.r. (February 2004). "Privatization Issues in Local and State Service Provision" (PDF). University of Michigan Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy.
  29. ↑ State Environmental Resource Center (September 24, 2006). "Water Privatization Policy Issues package".
  30. ↑ John Wisely; Detroit Free Press (December 17, 2010). "Millions Spent for Detroit Water Department Watchdogs, What Went Wrong".
  31. 1 2 "Water is a Human Right: Detroit Residents Seek U.N. Intervention as City Shuts Off Taps to Thousands". Democracy Now!. 2014-06-24. Retrieved 2014-07-03.
  32. ↑ "Victory in Emmaus," Public Citizen
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.