WikiLeaks-related Twitter court orders

Last updated

The WikiLeaks-related Twitter court orders were United States Department of Justice 2703(d) orders (called so because they are authorized by USC 18 2703(d)) accompanied by gag orders (authorized by USC 18 2705(b), both as differentiated from subpoenas and national security letters) issued to Twitter in relation to ongoing investigations of WikiLeaks issued on 14 December 2010. [1] [2] [3] [4] The U.S. government sent Twitter a subpoena for information about Julian Assange and several other WikiLeaks-related persons, including Chelsea Manning. Twitter appealed against the accompanying gag order in order to be able to disclose its existence to its users, and was ultimately successful in its appeal. [5] [6]

Contents

While only five people were individually named within the subpoena, according to lawyer Mark Stephens the order effectively entailed the collection of personal identifying information of over six hundred thousand Twitter users, principally those who were followers of WikiLeaks. [1] [2] [7] [8] Subsequent reactions included the discussion of secret subpoenas in the U.S., [9] criticism of the particular subpoena issued, [9] [10] [11] and calls for the recognition and emulation of Twitter's stance. [12]

Chronology

Subpoena issued with accompanying gag order

On 14 December 2010 the U.S. Department of Justice issued a subpoena directing Twitter to provide information in accordance with USC 18 2703(d). The order additionally directed that Twitter should not disclose the existence of the subpoena without prior authorization. Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Rop Gonggrijp, Jacob Appelbaum and Birgitta Jonsdottir were named in the subpoena. The requested information included their user names, addresses, telephone numbers, bank account details, and credit card numbers. [2] [ non-primary source needed ]

Assange's lawyer Mark Stephens argued that since the application also extended to destination email addresses and IP addresses for any communication stored for the named accounts, personal identifying information was to be collected for some six hundred and thirty-four thousand followers of WikiLeaks' Twitter feed. [1] [7] [8] WikiLeaks alleged it had reason to believe suggesting similar subpoenas had been issued to Google and Facebook, [13] and lawyer Mark Stephens said that similar information had been sought from Google, Facebook and eBay's Skype unit. [1]

Appeal and publication of the subpoena

Twitter applied to notify its users of the issue of the subpoena. [5] [14] [15] On 5 January 2011 it was notified of the success in its appeal, [6] allowing the company to inform its users and to give them ten days in turn in which to appeal. [14] After Twitter informed Jonsdottir, she released a tweet stating "USA government wants to know about all my tweets and more since November 1st 2009. Do they realize I am a member of parliament in Iceland?" [11]

Aden Fine of the ACLU said that "Twitter's e-mail indicated that it had not yet turned over to the U.S. government any records that prosecutors requested." [16]

Users' opposition to the subpoena

Among those specifically named by the subpoena, Assange, Jonsdottir, Appelbaum [8] and Gonggrijp [16] all stated that they would oppose it. Lawyer Aden Fine of the ACLU participated in defending those subpoenaed. [16] Jonsdottir stated that she had contacted the Icelandic Minister of Justice and Human Rights and commented that the "U.S. government is trying to criminalize whistleblowing and publication of whistleblowing material." [16]

On 11 March, a U.S. judge upheld the request of the federal prosecutor for the records. [17]

Reactions

The New York Times observed that the US government issues over fifty thousand such requests for information each year, typically accompanied by the so-called gag order. [9] [18] Nicholas Merrill, the first to file a constitutional challenge against the use of national security letters, describes this as "a perfect example of how the government can use its broad powers to silence people". [9] Lawmakers in Iceland criticised the subpoena as an instance of overreach. [10] [11] [19] Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, said that the subpoena was an attempt to "shake the electronic tree in the hope some kind of criminal charge drops out the bottom of it." [13]

Juan Cole, a historian of the modern Middle East and South Asia, described the subpoena as "a fishing expedition and legally fishy in that regard" that "is being pursued by the Obama administration out of terror that further massive leaks will be made public." [20] He contrasted the legal action with the lack of legal actions against "Bush administration officials, such as Dick Cheney, who ordered people tortured [and] have not been in any way inconvenienced by Mssrs. Obama and Holder." [20] WikiLeaks' list of 637,000 followers on Twitter dropped by 3,000 in the hours following the announcement of the US Department of Justice action. [8]

Professor of Law Ben Saul argued that the US had been compelled to attempt to obtain information on citizens of other countries through action against its own companies due to its lack of overseas law enforcement powers, suggesting that "the real question is how will other countries react … will other governments try to do things to shut down this kind of investigation?" [21] Members of the European Parliament from the Netherlands, Romania and the UK have questioned whether US 'snooping' on the Twitter accounts of those linked with WikiLeaks is in violation of European privacy laws. [22] [23]

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has since, comparing their law enforcement policies, stressed "how important it is that social media companies do what they can to protect the sensitive data they hold from the prying eyes of the government". [24] Wired staff writer Ryan Singel said that Twitter's "action in asking for the gag order to be overturned sets a new precedent that we can only hope that other companies begin to follow" and summarised his point of view by saying "Twitter beta-tested a spine" and that Twitter's response should become an "industry standard". [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

Cryptome was an online library and 501(c)(3) private foundation created in 1996 by John Young and Deborah Natsios and closed in 2023. The site collected information about freedom of expression, privacy, cryptography, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and government secrecy.

A gag order is an order, typically a legal order by a court or government, restricting information or comment from being made public or passed onto any unauthorized third party. The phrase may sometimes be used of a private order by an employer or other institution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rop Gonggrijp</span> Dutch hacker (born 1968)

Robbert (Rop) Valentijn Gonggrijp is a Dutch hacker and one of the founders of XS4ALL.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WikiLeaks</span> News leak publishing organisation

WikiLeaks is an online publisher and media organisation founded in 2006. It operates as a non-profit and is funded by donations and media partnerships. It has published classified documents and other media provided by anonymous sources. It was founded by Julian Assange, an Australian editor, publisher, and activist, who is currently challenging extradition to the United States over his work with WikiLeaks. Since September 2018, Kristinn Hrafnsson has served as its editor-in-chief. Its website states that it has released more than ten million documents and associated analyses. WikiLeaks' most recent publication was in 2021, and its most recent publication of original documents was in 2019. Beginning in November 2022, many of the documents on the organisation's website could not be accessed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smári McCarthy</span> Icelandic activist

Smári McCarthy is an Icelandic-Irish politician, innovator and information activist known for his work relating to direct democracy, transparency and privacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julian Assange</span> Australian editor, publisher, and activist, founder of WikiLeaks (born 1971)

Julian Paul Assange is an Australian editor, publisher, and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. He came to wide international attention in 2010 when WikiLeaks published a series of leaks from US Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning: footage of an US airstrike in Baghdad, US military logs from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and US diplomatic cables.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birgitta Jónsdóttir</span> Icelandic writer and politician (born 1967)

Birgitta Jónsdóttir is an Icelandic politician, anarchist, poet, and activist. She was a Member of the Althing (MP) for the Southwest Constituency from 2013 to 2017, representing the Pirate Party, having been elected at the 2013 election. She was previously an MP for Reykjavík Constituency South from 2009 to 2013. In November 2017, she has announced to retire from politics "for now".

The United States diplomatic cables leak, widely known as Cablegate, began on Sunday, 28 November 2010 when WikiLeaks began releasing classified cables that had been sent to the U.S. State Department by 274 of its consulates, embassies, and diplomatic missions around the world. Dated between December 1966 and February 2010, the cables contain diplomatic analysis from world leaders, and the diplomats' assessment of host countries and their officials.

WikiLeaks began publishing the United States diplomatic cables leak on 28 November 2010. The documents included classified cables that had been sent to the U.S. State Department by its consulates, embassies, and diplomatic missions around the world. The cables were dated between December 1966 and February 2010, and contained assessments of host countries and their officials. The publication of the cables produced varying responses around the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kristinn Hrafnsson</span> Icelandic investigative journalist (born 1962)

Kristinn Hrafnsson is an Icelandic investigative journalist who has been the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks since 2018. He was the spokesperson for WikiLeaks between 2010 and 2017.

<i>WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assanges War on Secrecy</i> Book by David Leigh and Luke Harding

WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy is a 2011 book by British journalists David Leigh and Luke Harding. It is an account of Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, and the leak by Chelsea Manning of classified material to the website in 2010. It was published by Guardian Books in February 2011.

WikiLeaks, a whistleblowing website founded by Julian Assange, has received praise as well as criticism from the public, hacktivists, journalist organisations and government officials. The organisation has revealed human rights abuses and was the target of an alleged "cyber war". Allegations have been made that Wikileaks worked with or was exploited by the Russian government and acted in a partisan manner during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrett Brown</span> American journalist, essayist and activist

Barrett Lancaster Brown is an American journalist, essayist, activist and former associate of Anonymous. In 2010, he founded Project PM, a group that used a wiki to analyze leaks concerning the military-industrial complex. It was classified a "criminal organization" by the Department of Justice. In late 2020, Brown restarted Project PM.

<i>The Fifth Estate</i> (film) 2013 thriller film by Bill Condon

The Fifth Estate is a 2013 biographical thriller film directed by Bill Condon about the news-leaking website WikiLeaks. The film stars Benedict Cumberbatch as its editor-in-chief and founder Julian Assange and Daniel Brühl as its former spokesperson Daniel Domscheit-Berg. Anthony Mackie, David Thewlis, Alicia Vikander, Stanley Tucci, and Laura Linney are featured in supporting roles. The film's screenplay was written by Josh Singer based in-part on Domscheit-Berg's book Inside WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World's Most Dangerous Website (2011), as well as WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy (2011) by British journalists David Leigh and Luke Harding. The film's name is a reference to people who operate in the manner of journalists outside the normal constraints imposed on the mainstream media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WikiLeaks Party</span> Political party in Australia

The WikiLeaks Party was a minor political party in Australia between 2013 and 2015. The party was created in part to support Julian Assange's failed bid for a Senate seat in Australia in the 2013 election, where they won 0.62% of the national vote. At the time Assange was seeking refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. The WikiLeaks Party national council included Assange, Matt Watt, Gail Malone, Assange’s biological father John Shipton, Omar Todd and Gerry Georgatos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sigurdur Thordarson</span> Icelandic hacker, informant and criminal

Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson, commonly known as Siggi hakkari, is an Icelandic convicted criminal and FBI informant against WikiLeaks. He is known for information leaks, multiple cases of fraud and embezzlement, sexual solicitation of minors and adults. He has multiple convictions for sexual offences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vault 7</span> CIA files on cyber war and surveillance

Vault 7 is a series of documents that WikiLeaks began to publish on 7 March 2017, detailing the activities and capabilities of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to perform electronic surveillance and cyber warfare. The files, dating from 2013 to 2016, include details on the agency's software capabilities, such as the ability to compromise cars, smart TVs, web browsers, and the operating systems of most smartphones, as well as other operating systems such as Microsoft Windows, macOS, and Linux. A CIA internal audit identified 91 malware tools out of more than 500 tools in use in 2016 being compromised by the release. The tools were developed by the Operations Support Branch of the C.I.A.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indictment and arrest of Julian Assange</span>

In 2012, while on bail Julian Assange was granted political asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he sought to avoid extradition to Sweden, and what his supporters said was the possibility of subsequent extradition to the US. On 11 April 2019, Ecuador revoked his asylum, he was arrested for failing to appear in court, and carried out of the Embassy by members of the London Metropolitan Police. Following his arrest, the US revealed a previously sealed 2018 US indictment in which Assange was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion related to his involvement with Chelsea Manning and WikiLeaks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017–2018 Department of Justice metadata seizures</span> Seizure of two American congressmens personal data

The United States Department of Justice under the Trump administration acquired by a February 2018 subpoena the Apple iCloud metadata of two Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, several others associated with the committee, and some of their family members. The subpoena covered 73 phone numbers and 36 email addresses since the inception of the accounts. Seizing communications information of members of Congress is extraordinarily rare. The department also subpoenaed and obtained 2017 and 2018 phone log and email metadata from news reporters for CNN, The Washington Post and The New York Times. Apple also received and complied with February 2018 subpoenas for the iCloud accounts of White House counsel Don McGahn and his wife. Microsoft received a subpoena relating to a personal email account of a congressional staff member in 2017.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Larson, Erik (10 January 2011). "US Twitter Subpoena on WikiLeaks is Harassment, Lawyer Says". Bloomberg . Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  2. 1 2 3 "Twitter Subpoena" (PDF). Salon . 17 January 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  3. Kerr, Orin (11 January 2011). "2703(d) Orders in the News — No, Really". Volokh Conspiracy . Retrieved 21 May 2014.
  4. McCullagh, Declan (7 January 2014). "DOJ sends order to Twitter for WikiLeaks-related account info". CNET .
  5. 1 2 Sonne, Paul (10 January 2011). "U.S. Asks Twitter for WikiLeaks Data". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  6. 1 2 "Twitter Unsealing Order" (PDF). Rop Gonggrijp. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 January 2011. Retrieved 11 January 2011.
  7. 1 2 Whittaker, Zack (8 January 2011). "US Subpoenas Wikileaks Tweets, and Why This Could Affect You". ZDNet . Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Staff writer (10 January 2011). "US Turns to Twitter as WikiLeaks Chase Continues". The Sydney Morning Herald . Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 11 January 2011.
  9. 1 2 3 4 (registration required)Cohen, Noam (9 January 2011). "Twitter Shines a Spotlight on Secret F.B.I. Subpoenas". The New York Times . Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  10. 1 2 Connor, Richard (9 January 2011). "Iceland Blasts US Demand for Lawmaker's Details in WikiLeaks Probe". Deutsche Welle . Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  11. 1 2 3 Rushe, Dominic (8 January 2011). "Icelandic MP Fights US Demand for Her Twitter Account Details — Birgitta Jonsdottir Brands Efforts by US Justice Department To Access Her Private Information 'Completely Unacceptable'". The Guardian . London. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  12. 1 2 Singel, Ryan (10 January 2011). "Twitter's Response to WikiLeaks Subpoena Should Be the Industry Standard". Wired . Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 11 January 2011.
  13. 1 2 Yost, Pete; Satter, Raphael G. (8 January 2011). "WikiLeaks Subpoenas Spill Out into Public Realm". Associated Press (via Toronto Star). Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011.
  14. 1 2 Greenwald, Glenn. "DOJ Subpoenas Twitter Records of Several WikiLeaks Volunteers". Salon . Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  15. Beaumont, Peter (8 January 2011). "WikiLeaks Demands Google and Facebook Unseal US Subpoenas". The Guardian . London. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Hosenball, Mark (11 January 2011). "WikiLeaks Activists May Seek To Quash Demand for Docs". Reuters . Archived from the original on 12 January 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011.
  17. Jeremy Pelofsky (12 March 2011). "U.S. judge backs request for Assange friends' records". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016. Retrieved 9 April 2011.
  18. Helft, Miguel (9 January 2011). "1986 Privacy Law is Outrun by the Web". The New York Times . Retrieved 13 January 2011.
  19. Menn, Joseph; et al. (8 January 2011). "Iceland Protests over US Probe of Lawmaker". The Financial Times . Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  20. 1 2 Cole, Juan (8 January 2011). "DOJ Subpoenas Twitter Account of Wikileaks Volunteer and Now Iceland MP". Juan Cole. Archived from the original on 13 January 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011.
  21. Sherington, Greg (11 January 2011). "US Subpoena of Iceland Twitter Accounts". Sydney Law School . Retrieved 13 January 2011.
  22. "Anonymous urges global protests". BBC. 14 January 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  23. "ALDE Calls on Commission to clarify issue of US Government Wikileaks subpoenas". Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe . Retrieved 17 January 2011.
  24. "Social Media and Law Enforcement: Who Gets What Data and When?". Electronic Frontier Foundation. 20 January 2011. Retrieved 22 January 2011.