William F. Schulz (born November 14,1949) is a Unitarian Universalist minister who is most known for his role as the executive director of Amnesty International USA,the U.S. division of Amnesty International,from March 1994 to 2006. He is a prominent spokesperson,activist,and author focusing primarily on the issue of Human Rights and United States' Government role in promoting or disregarding them. In addition to his many public appearances,he has been affiliated with numerous non-profit organizations and universities.
William Schulz was born November 14,1949 to Professor William F. Schulz and Jean Schulz in Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania. He attended Oberlin College for his undergraduate degree,which he completed in 1971. He earned a master's degree from University of Chicago in 1974,and completed his Doctorate of Ministry at Meadville Lombard Theological School in 1975. He married his wife Reverend Beth Graham,who is also a Unitarian minister,in 1993.[1]
Schulz most noted role is as the executive director for Amnesty International USA,an NGO focused on human rights,from 1994 to 2006. During this time he made numerous appearances as a guest on national radio and television programs,and testified before Congress concerning human rights issues. During his tenure,Amnesty International was seen to become increasingly interventionist in its policies,advocating that states take a more active role in secure human rights protections,encouraging collaboration with law enforcement and even military force.[2]
His own writings during his tenure emphasized the importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as an embodiment of the international conception of human rights. During his acceptance speech for the Humanist of the Year from the American Humanist Association in 2000,he said "The fact is that the world community has never been able to agree upon the divine basis for human rights or a basis derived from natural law. But there is a third broad way to justify human rights which,while it doesn't provide them with the status of God's endorsement or nature's sanction,does ground them in the human community. That third way goes by many names—pragmatism,communitarianism,and post-modernism among others—but is ultimately nothing more than an expression of the humanist impulse."[3]
Also during his tenure,the increasing economic ties with China led to scrutiny and debate about China's policies regarding human rights. During his testimony to the United States House,he criticized the increased use of the death penalty as well as the use of imprisonment and torture against democratic activists and ethnic and religious minorities. In particular in arguing against continued MFN status with China,he said "the message is clear,good trade relations in the midst of human rights violations is acceptable to the United States."[4]
Protest against human rights violation at Guantánamo Bay prison (June 2006)
The events of the September 11 attacks,and the subsequent expansion of the United States counter-terrorism efforts were the subject of his 2003 book Tainted Legacy:9/11 and the Ruin of Human Rights which finds him criticizing both the government's use of torture,which he credits with inspiring terrorists,as well as some of his human rights activist colleagues for failing to frame terrorism and genocide as a human rights issues.[5]
Schulz has been the author of numerous books throughout his career and during his retirement,as well as a frequent contributor to periodicals.[8] A selection of his books include:
What Torture Taught Me:And Other Reflections on Justice and Theology,2013.
Tainted Legacy:9/11 and the Ruin of Human Rights,2003
Making the Manifesto:The Birth of Religious Humanism,2002
In Our Own Best Interest:How Defending Human Rights Benefits Us All,2001
↑ Tolley, Howard (May 2004). "Tainted Legacy: 9/11 and the Ruin of Human Rights". Human Rights Quarterly. 28 (2): 539–542. doi:10.1353/hrq.2004.0026. S2CID143955293.
↑ Schulz, William F (September 2000). "The humanist basis for human rights". The Humanist. Vol.60, no.5. American Humanist Association.
↑ United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights (1996), China MFN: human rights consequences: hearing before the Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights of the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, second session, June 18, 1996, U.S. G.P.O.: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
