World Forum for Democracy

Last updated

The World Forum for Democracy is a gathering each November in Strasbourg, France to debate the complex challenges facing democracies today and foster democratic innovation. The Forum is hosted by the Council of Europe and brings together members of civil society, political leaders and representatives of business, academia, media and professional groups. Past editions have revolved around themes such as "Bridging the gap: democracy between old models and new realities", "Re-wiring Democracy: connecting institutions and citizens in the digital age" and "From participation to influence: can youth revitalise democracy?".

Contents

The Forum's concept is that the challenges of 21st century democracy need to be addressed with 21st century means, using the power of networked communication, and harnessing social and political innovation from the grassroots. The exchanges that take place during the World Forum meetings focus on real-life initiatives by public authorities or grassroots actors, which are critically examined by an interdisciplinary international panel. The insights gathered during the meetings inform the work of the Council of Europe and its partners in the field of democracy and democratic governance.

The theme for 2017 is "Is populism a problem?".

History

World Forum for Democracy 2012

The World Forum for Democracy was launched in 2012 on the initiative of Secretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland. The first edition took place between 5 and 11 October 2012 and was titled "Bridging the gap: democracy between old models and new realities". [1] The discussions dealt with a broad range of issues, including the fate of democracy in post-Arab Spring countries, youth and democracy, the democratic potential of the internet and the impact of the economic crisis on democracy. The Forum was inaugurated by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. Other speakers included Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman and Egyptian activist Nawal El Saadawi.

World Forum for Democracy 2013

The second World Forum ("Re-wiring Democracy: connecting institutions and citizens in the digital age") was held between 23 and 29 November 2013 and addressed the impact of new information and communication technologies on democratic practices. [2] The discussions on the initiatives presented at the Forum were organized in 21 "labs", each focusing on a different aspect of e-democracy. [3] The debates covered subjects such as liquid democracy, participatory budgeting, e-government platforms and the use of crowdsourcing in law-making. Speakers at this year's Forum included Abdou Diouf, Secretary General of La Francophonie, and Mary Kaldor, Professor of Global Governance at the London School of Economics. [4]

The 2013 Forum introduced the "Democracy Innovation Award", a prize awarded by the Council of Europe to one of the showcased initiatives in recognition of its contribution to the enhancement of public participation in the democratic process. Based on the votes cast by Forum participants, the award was given to Women of Uganda Network (WOUGNET). [5]

Showcased initiatives

World Forum for Democracy 2014

The third World Forum for Democracy ("From participation to influence: can youth revitalise democracy?") took place between 3 and 5 November 2014 and tackled the issue of youth participation. [6] The lab discussions focused on initiatives to promote the inclusion of young people in the decision-making process and encourage civic engagement among youth. On the first day of the Forum, a keynote address was delivered by Jeremy Rifkin on his theory of the "zero marginal cost society". Other speakers included Chantal Mouffe, Director of the Centre of Democracy at the University of Westminster, Felipe Jeldres, President of the International Union of Socialist Youth, and Yves Leterme, Secretary-General of International IDEA. [7] This edition featured six "unconferences", whose agendas were determined by the attendees themselves prior to the Forum. [8] The 2014 Democracy Innovation Award was presented to the Turkish initiative "Generation Democracy". [9]

Showcased initiatives

World Forum for Democracy 2015

“Freedom vs control: For a democratic response”

The fourth edition of the Forum, “Freedom vs control: For a democratic response”, took place from 16–21 November. The objective of the 2015 Forum is to identify ways of reinforcing democratic oversight over security responses, to address fear driven by violent attacks, and to guarantee media freedom in a context of increased security measures. Decision-makers, opinion leaders and social innovators will debate the approaches to be adopted at the international, national, regional and local level in order to ensure the protection of freedom in democracy facing violence and extremism. These exchanges will be based on initiatives and ideas which have been selected through an open call and will be submitted for critical review by Forum participants.

The Forum's debates should help inspire states, local authorities and organisations across the world and pave the way for future work by the Council of Europe and other organisations in this field. The choice of this topic lies on a common sentiment that links together democracies worldwide: the sentiment of exposure to a diverse range of threats, from violent extremism to economic, technological, environmental and geopolitical risks. Modern societies are aware that these threats (especially violent attacks driven by ideology) can reinforce conflicts, destabilise society and, as a consequence, discourage social cohesion. Moreover, the increase in online control has led to a lack of personal data protection. On the one hand, a certain level of control might preserve citizens’ safety, but on the other hand it might represent a threat to freedom and democracy. The World Forum for Democracy will analyse the delicate balance between security and freedom and how it can be maintained in a democratic society when it is under threat: can freedom and control coexist in a democratic world?

The main goal of the Forum is to suggest solutions and promote measures which will ensure security and safeguard democracy. In the era of communication technology this is particularly important. The forum will raise awareness of new ideas on democratic responses to security challenges. These ideas will be examined under three main lenses, or challenges.

The three Challenges

* Challenge 1 – Ensuring security and bringing surveillance under control

The first challenge questions the importance of mass surveillance in order to defend citizens from threats, for instance from terrorism. The growing tension between the concern for safety and the protection of freedoms is one of the key challenges facing democracies today. The revelations of intelligence agency interception of digital networks have undermined trust in government's capacity to oversee these agencies. How much freedom are we prepared to give up in order to defend our societies from terrorism? How can democracies deal with security risks linked to the digital revolution without jeopardising fundamental democratic values?

If it is true that mass surveillance is a key in the fight of terrorism and organised crime, to what extent can citizens accept this lack of privacy and the restriction of personal freedom?

* Challenge 2 – Liberating society from fear and nurturing the desire for freedom

The second challenge addresses the fear generated by violent attacks driven by ideology. Such fear discourages social inclusion and can generate negative feelings among citizens; for example, discrimination, segregation and stigmatization. It will be discussed whether or not fear is rooted in the ignorance of the culture of “the other”. Moreover, it will be questioned how it is possible to orient public opinion towards a more open and positive perception in order to encourage a more open and inclusive society. These actions aim to reduce anxiety and discourage extreme and violent ideologies. Education should foster shared humanistic values and encourage trust between citizens and the institutions.

* Challenge 3 – Freedom of information in the “age of terror”

This third challenge analyses a wide range of topics: from the importance of whistleblowing, to the protection of freedom of expression, one of the main pillars of a democratic society. What should be the adequate response of media to ideological violence and terrorism? What is the impact of media ownership, and the control of major internet companies over personal and other data, on freedom and democratic debate? If whistleblowing is a necessary element of democratic control over institutions, how can whistleblowers be protected by the risk of abusive prosecution?

Showcased initiatives

New features introduced with the 2015 World Forum for Democracy

Children’s Forum

Recognising the importance of educating children for democracy from the early ages, the Council of Europe offered to them a dedicated space, “Children’s Forum”, to allow them to express freely, to participate, to learn voting as the parliamentarians do, to cast their vote, to learn and ask questions about their rights, to innovate, in a context which allowed their voice heard at European level.

On 3 March 2016, the Council of Europe hosted in its hemicycle the Children's Forum, an event part of the World Forum for Democracy. 1200 students from 45 primary schools of Alsace region, France, who took part in a civic education project run by the Alsatian Themis Association, came to present their proposals for enhancing democracy and human rights.

The proposals were focused on one of the following three main themes: living together and participation, citizens of Internet, and all different, all equal. The students were assisted in this work by their teachers and ten proposals were shortlisted by a jury and further presented and put on open vote during the Children Forum. The winner received the trophy of the Children's Forum.

Satellite events

In order to reach out to a wider range of contributors and enrich the debate, the Forum welcomes the organisation of “satellite events” by universities renowned in the sphere of political studies and international relations, non-governmental organisations, municipalities and other institutions.

The organising institutions are free to decide independently about the dates and format of the event, the speakers and the specific topic(s). The satellite events can take place any time during the year. Possible formats include seminars or a seminar series, lectures in schools, surveys, social media campaigns, hackathons, local implementation of innovation initiatives presented in previous Forums, radio/TV debates, or lightning talks with public at large (at NGOs, schools, community centres, etc.).

In 2015, four outstanding universities organised satellite events related to the Forum's topic:

  • College of Europe, Bruges, Belgium: “The challenges of free speech and democratic debate online”
  • Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, Germany: “Digital whistleblowing: blessing or curse?”
  • Central European University, Budapest, Hungary: “Freedom from fear in a diverse society”
  • Windesheim University of Applied Sciences in Zwolle, the Netherlands: World Forum for Democracy “Freedom vs control”
Incubator for participatory democracy

The incubator for participatory democracy is based on an alliance of democracy innovators, brought together by the Council of Europe at the World Forum for Democracy. Its purpose is to connect city governments in Europe and beyond with democracy innovators to replicate and scale up democratic innovations. The incubator supports initiatives - digital and offline - that contribute to the redistribution of political power towards citizens, and that support the broadest possible citizen participation in the cities’ decision-making procedures. The incubator builds an open infrastructure to boost democracy for inclusive and innovative cities. In the frame of World Forum for Democracy 2015, 30 experts, researchers, elected representatives from cities, social and democratic innovators, grassroots activists and civil servants gathered in a so-called “Hackaton” - a collaborative workshop where they thought about and discussed the best ways to support the development of transparent, participative and collaborative democracy.

World Forum for Democracy 2016

“Education and democracy: how to bridge the social divides?”

The 2016 World Forum for Democracy took place in Strasbourg, 7–9 November. It focused on the relationship between education and democracy. It examined whether they can reinforce each other and together address the risks of new social divides. In particular, the forum explored how education and democracy can nurture active citizens with critical and analytical skills, and how through fostering grassroots innovation and bottom-up democratic reform, it can help develop civic engagement and improve opportunities for all.

Acknowledging the central role of education at personal and societal level, and the relation between the acquired degree of education and the active participation in elections and generally into a democratic society, the relation between access to education and the prospect to become an informed, conscious and active citizen, the Forum sought to respond to questions as:

Is education fulfilling its democratic mission or is it failing to build the key qualities for democratic citizenship? What is role of different education actors – teachers, learners, families, civil society organisations, public authorities, and the media? Is it necessary to reform the organisation and functioning of educational institutions in order to better respond to the requirements of democracy? How non-formal and informal education can break the link between social inequality and political inequality and help nurture active citizens and leaders from disadvantaged backgrounds to drive sustainable change?

Showcased initiatives

World Forum for Democracy 2017

"Is populism a problem?"

The 2017 World Forum for Democracy will take place in Strasbourg, 8-10 November 2017. It is focused on "a growing disconnect between citizens and political elites, and dramatic changes in the media ecosystem", as well as "new political and media actors and practices are emerging, offering new opportunities for members of the public to participate in political life." [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy</span> Form of government

Democracy is a system of government in which state power is vested in the people or the general population of a state. According to the United Nations, democracy "provides an environment that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, and in which the freely expressed will of people is exercised."

Participatory democracy, participant democracy or participative democracy is a form of government in which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through elected representatives. Elements of direct and representative democracy are combined in this model.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public participation (decision making)</span> Extent to which societies encourage the people to share in organizational decision-making

Citizen participation or public participation in social science refers to different mechanisms for the public to express opinions—and ideally exert influence—regarding political, economic, management or other social decisions. Participatory decision-making can take place along any realm of human social activity, including economic, political, management, cultural or familial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">E-democracy</span> Use of information and communication technology in political and governance processes

E-democracy, also known as digital democracy or Internet democracy, uses information and communication technology (ICT) in political and governance processes. The term is credited to digital activist Steven Clit. By using 21st-century ICT, e-democracy seeks to enhance democracy, including aspects like civic technology and E-government. Proponents argue that by promoting transparency in decision-making processes, e-democracy can empower all citizens to observe and understand the proceedings. Also, if they possess overlooked data, perspectives, or opinions, they can contribute meaningfully. This contribution extends beyond mere informal disconnected debate; it facilitates citizen engagement in the proposal, development, and actual creation of a country's laws. In this way, e-democracy has the potential to incorporate crowdsourced analysis more directly into the policy-making process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Participatory budgeting</span>

Participatory budgeting (PB) is a type of citizen sourcing in which ordinary people decide how to allocate part of a municipal or public budget through a process of democratic deliberation and decision-making. Participatory budgeting allows citizens or residents of a locality to identify, discuss, and prioritize public spending projects, and gives them the power to make real decisions about how money is spent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civic engagement</span> Individual or group activity addressing issues of public concern

Civic engagement or civic participation is any individual or group activity addressing issues of public concern. Civic engagement includes communities working together or individuals working alone in both political and non-political actions to protect public values or make a change in a community. The goal of civic engagement is to address public concerns and promote the quality of the community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance</span> Sweden-based intergovernmental organization

The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance is an intergovernmental organization that works to support and strengthen democratic institutions and processes around the world, to develop sustainable, effective and legitimate democracies. It has regional offices in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia and the Pacific, Africa and West Asia, and North America. The organization is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Electronic participation (e-participation) refers to the use of ICT in facilitating citizen participation in government-related processes, encompassing areas such as administration, service delivery, decision-making, and policy-making. As such, e-participation shares close ties with e-government and e-governance participation. The term's emergence aligns with the digitization of citizen interests and interactions with political service providers, primarily due to the proliferation of e-government.

Public participation, also known as citizen participation or patient and public involvement, is the inclusion of the public in the activities of any organization or project. Public participation is similar to but more inclusive than stakeholder engagement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civic intelligence</span> Intelligence devoted to public issues

Civic intelligence is an "intelligence" that is devoted to addressing public or civic issues. The term has been applied to individuals and, more commonly, to collective bodies, like organizations, institutions, or societies. Civic intelligence can be used in politics by groups of people who are trying to achieve a common goal. Social movements and political engagement in history might have been partly involved with collective thinking and civic intelligence. Education, in its multiple forms, has helped some countries to increase political awareness and engagement by amplifying the civic intelligence of collaborative groups. Increasingly, artificial intelligence and social media, modern innovations of society, are being used by many political entities and societies to tackle problems in politics, the economy, and society at large.

Janaagraha Centre for Citizenship and Democracy (www.janaagraha.org) is a non-profit trust, working towards the mission of transforming the quality of life in India's cities and towns. Founded in 2001 by Ramesh Ramanathan and Swati Ramanathan, it started as a movement to include people's participation in public governance and has now evolved into a robust institution for citizenship and democracy. The core idea of Janaagraha's work does not revolve around fixing problems but instead seeking to fix the system that can solve the problems. To achieve this objective, Janaagraha works with citizens to catalyse active citizenship in city neighbourhoods and with governments to institute reforms to city governance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North–South Centre</span> Building in Lisbon, Portugal

The North–South Centre, officially the European Centre for Global Interdependence and Solidarity, is a Partial Agreement of the Council of Europe, the oldest political organisation of European states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle East Partnership Initiative</span>

The U.S.-Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) is a United States State Department program that fosters meaningful and effective partnerships between citizens, civil society, the private sector, and governments in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region to resolve local challenges and promote shared interests in the areas of participatory governance and economic opportunity and reform.

Types of democracy refers to pluralism of governing structures such as governments and other constructs like workplaces, families, community associations, and so forth. Types of democracy can cluster around values. Some such types promote equal and direct participation in political acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth council</span> Forum for youth and/or children to advocate

Youth councils or parliaments, are a form of youth voice engaged in community decision-making. Youth councils are appointed bodies that exist on local, state, provincial, regional, national, and international levels among governments, non governmental organisations (NGOs), schools, and other entities. Groups that include children often call themselves children's parliaments and are paired with youth parliaments of older kids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy International eV</span> International non-governmental organisation

Democracy International e.V. is an international non-governmental organisation (NGO) working on strengthening direct democracy and citizens' participation at local level, in the nation states and on the global level. Democracy International has been existing as a loose network of democracy activists since 2002. The organisation was formally established in June 2011 as a registered membership association according to German non-profit law. Democracy International is politically independent and funded by membership fees and individual donations. The headquarters are in Cologne, Germany.

Civic technology, or civic tech, enhances the relationship between the people and government with software for communications, decision-making, service delivery, and political process. It includes information and communications technology supporting government with software built by community-led teams of volunteers, nonprofits, consultants, and private companies as well as embedded tech teams working within government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patrizia Nanz</span>

Patrizia Nanz is a political scientist and an expert in public participation and democratic innovations. She has provided expertise to businesses, state agencies, and governments in various European countries.

As of 2015, over 1,500 instances of participatory budgeting (PB) have been implemented across the five continents. While the democratic spirit of PB remains the same throughout the world, institutional variations abound.

Participatory democracy "is founded on the direct action of citizens who exercise some power and decide issues affecting their lives". Participatory democracy refers to mechanisms through which citizens are involved in public decision-making processes, not as an alternative to representative democracy but as a complement to it.

References

  1. ↑ Lehn, Suzanne. "France: Photos and Impressions from the World Forum for Democracy 2012 in Strasbourg", Global Voices Online, 19 October 2012. Retrieved on 8 June 2015.
  2. ↑ Harris, Marcy and Girling, Rob. "Can the Internet Improve Democracy? Thoughts on the 2013 World Forum for Democracy", techPresident, 6 December 2013. Retrieved on 8 June 2015.
  3. ↑ Lehn, Suzanne. "World Forum for Democracy 2013: Connecting Citizens and Institutions", Global Voices Online, 22 December 2013. Retrieved on 8 June 2015.
  4. ↑ "Connecting institutions and citizens in the digital age: Final report, Council of Europe, 1 April 2014. Retrieved on 9 June 2015.
  5. ↑ "WOUGNET wins a Democracy Innovation Award", UGO News, 11 February 2014. Retrieved on 8 June 2015.
  6. ↑ Fakhry, Samia. "The Council of Europe gives young people a say in how to revitalise democracy", Ahram Online, 4 November 2014. Retrieved on 5 June 2015.
  7. ↑ "From participation to influence: can youth revitalise democracy?: Final report", Council of Europe, 29 May 2015. Retrieved on 9 June 2015.
  8. ↑ Lehn, Suzanne. "Young People Will Revitalize Politics, Promises This Year’s World Forum for Democracy", Global Voices Online, 14 November 2014. Retrieved on 5 June 2015.
  9. ↑ "The Council of Europe’s Democracy Innovation Award goes to Turkish initiative "Generation Democracy"", Orer, 5 November 2014. Retrieved on 5 June 2015.
  10. ↑ "World Forum for Democracy 2017". www.coe.int. Retrieved 2017-04-09.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.