Yong Vui Kong

Last updated • 5 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Yong Vui Kong
Born23 January 1988 (1988-01-23) (age 36) [1]
Criminal statusImprisoned at Changi Prison since 12 June 2007
Criminal chargeDrug trafficking
Penalty Life imprisonment (x3) and 15 strokes of the cane

Yong Vui Kong (Chinese :杨伟光; pinyin :Yáng Weǐguāng) (born 23 January 1988) is a Malaysian who was sentenced to death in Singapore for trafficking more than 15 grams of heroin in 2007. His sentence was reduced to life imprisonment and caning as a result of Singapore's amendments to the Misuse of Drugs Act. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Personal life

Yong is from the state of Sabah, Malaysia. He was a younger sibling to two brothers, Yun Leong and Yun Chung, and has four more siblings. He was working as a "runner" (meaning courier or mule) for an unidentified criminal boss, [5] when he was arrested on 12 June 2007 with 47.27 grams (1.667 oz) of heroin. He was 19 years old at the time, and thus not an adult (the age of majority in Singapore is 21 years). He is also said to be ignorant of the death penalty for smuggling drugs or that the package he was carrying contained drugs. The criminal boss of Yong's, Chia Choon Leng, was subsequently arrested and charged for drug trafficking, but given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal and sentenced to indefinite detention. [6]

Yong was originally represented in the High Court by lawyer Kelvin Lim. Due to Yong's young age, and since execution is mandatory for a person convicted of trafficking in more than 15 grams (0.53 oz) of diamorphine, the trial judge Justice Choo Han Teck asked the prosecution to consider reducing the charge against him. The prosecution declined, and Yong was found guilty and sentenced to death. [7] Through his then lawyer, Yong filed an appeal against the conviction and sentence, but withdrew it on 29 April 2009, the day of the appeal hearing. He then petitioned to President S. R. Nathan for clemency on 11 August 2009, but this was declined on 20 November 2009.

On 2 December 2009, two days before the scheduled date of Yong's execution, human rights lawyer M. Ravi took over Yong's case and obtained a stay of execution before the High Court until the Court of Appeal could hear the application to restore Yong's appeal for hearing. On 8 December 2009, the Court of Appeal, consisting of Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong, Judges of Appeal Andrew Phang and V. K. Rajah, restored Yong's appeal for hearing. The court accepted Ravi's argument that Yong had withdrawn the appeal on the mistaken belief that he could not re-argue the unconstitutionality of the death penalty, in light of past court decisions such as the case of Van Tuong Nguyen. The three judges then proceeded to hear the appeal on 15 March 2010, and on 14 May 2010, they ruled in Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor that the mandatory death penalty imposed by the Misuse of Drugs Act [8] did not infringe Articles 9(1) and 12(1) of the Singapore Constitution. [9]

Before the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment, Minister of Law K Shanmugam commented on the mandatory death penalty at a community event and cited Yong's case as an example. Ravi filed an application in the High Court for leave to challenge the clemency process by way of judicial review. The application was dismissed and M. Ravi went before the same three judges, who heard Yong's appeal, in the appeal against the leave application. On 4 April 2011, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against that judgment. It affirmed the High Court's view that the President did not possess any personal discretion when exercising the clemency power, and was required to act in accordance with Cabinet's advice on the matter. The conclusion was evident from the wording of Article 22P(1) of the Constitution, the legislative history of the clemency power in Singapore, relevant case law, and the nature of the President's power in the Constitution.

Subsequently, Ravi applied before those three judges in the Court of Appeal once more to re-open its decision on Yong's appeal in March 2012, alleging that Yong had been discriminated when the Attorney-General, in his capacity as the Public Prosecutor, decided to charge Yong for capital offences while applying for discharges not amounting to acquittals for the mastermind behind Yong. The new argument was based on a recent judgment in January that year where the three judges ruled against another drug trafficker represented by M. Ravi, that while the prosecutorial discretion is subjected to judicial review, the applicant failed to produce evidence that the Public Prosecutor took into account irrelevant considerations or was biased in his decision. The application was also dismissed on 4 April 2012.

In July 2012, the Singapore government agreed to ratify changes to the mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking and murder offences – those on death row at that point of time may apply to have their death sentences reduced to life imprisonment. [10] [11] For those convicted of drug trafficking, they would be sentenced to imprisonment for life with/without caning, provided that they were only acting as couriers, were suffering from impaired mental responsibility (e.g. depression), substantively assist the authorities in tackling drug trafficking activities, or any other conditions. For drug traffickers who were not condemned to death but to life-long incarceration with caning, they should receive no less than 15 strokes of the cane. Yong was certified to have fulfilled the role of courier and had substantively assisted the authorities in the fight against drugs. [12] [13]

On 14 November 2013, Yong's death penalty was lifted. He has become the first drug trafficker on death row to have his sentence reduced to life imprisonment [lower-alpha 1] and caning (15 strokes), under amendments made to the Misuse of Drugs Act. The sentence was backdated to the time when Yong was first charged. [15] [16] Yong was reportedly relieved when he was re-sentenced to life and caning, and so did his family from Sabah. On 22 August 2014, M. Ravi appealed against the new sentence, this time before Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, Judge of Appeal Andrew Phang and Justice Tay Yong Kwang, that the caning imposed on Yong is unconstitutional. The appeal was dismissed on 4 March 2015. [17]

Yong will spend the rest of his natural life in jail but has a chance for release on parole upon the authorities' review of his conduct after he serves at least 20 years in prison, including time spent in remand and during the original sentence. The parole hearing will occur in June 2027. Yong, who devoted himself to Buddhism in prison and learned to speak English, hoped he could counsel youth on the dangers of drugs during his period of imprisonment. [18]

See also

Notes

  1. By order of the landmark appeal ruling of Abdul Nasir bin Amer Hamsah's case on 20 August 1997, life imprisonment in Singapore would mean a sentence of imprisonment for the rest of the convict's natural life, with a possible chance of release on parole after the expiration of at least 20 years of the sentence, which is applicable for crimes committed after 20 August 1997. [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Singapore</span>

Capital punishment in Singapore is a legal penalty. Executions in Singapore are carried out by long drop hanging, and usually take place at dawn. Thirty-three offences—including murder, drug trafficking, terrorism, use of firearms and kidnapping—warrant the death penalty under Singapore law.

Choo Han Teck is a Singaporean judge of the Supreme Court. He was formerly a lawyer before his appointment to the court as a judge. It was revealed in 2021 that Choo was one of the defence lawyers representing Adrian Lim, the infamous Toa Payoh child killer who was executed in 1988 for charges of murdering a girl and boy as ritual sacrifices. In 1994, Choo also defended Phua Soy Boon, a jobless Singaporean who was hanged in 1995 for killing a moneylender.

<i>Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor</i> Singapore Supreme Court case

Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor was a seminal case decided in 2010 by the Court of Appeal of Singapore which, in response to a challenge by Yong Vui Kong, a convicted drug smuggler, held that the mandatory death penalty imposed by the Misuse of Drugs Act ("MDA") for certain drug trafficking offences does not infringe Articles 9(1) and 12(1) of the Constitution of Singapore.

<i>Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor</i> A landmark decision in 1980 from Singapore

Ong Ah Chuan v Public Prosecutor is a landmark decision delivered in 1980 by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from Singapore which deals with the constitutionality of section 15 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 ("MDA"), and the mandatory death penalty by the Act for certain offences. The appellants contended that the presumption of trafficking under section 15 of the MDA violated Article 9(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore and that the mandatory death penalty was arbitrary and violated Article 12(1) of the Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M Ravi</span> Singaporean lawyer

Ravi Madasamy, better known as M Ravi, is a Singaporean former human rights lawyer and activist. Known for his work as a cause lawyer, he has acted in multiple leading cases in Singaporean constitutional law and human rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Execution of Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam</span> Execution of a Malaysian Indian for drug trafficking in Singapore

Nagaenthran a/l K. Dharmalingam was a Malaysian drug trafficker who was convicted of trafficking 42.72 grams of heroin in April 2009 upon entering Singapore from Malaysia at Woodlands Checkpoint with a bundle of heroin strapped to his thigh. Nagaenthran confessed to committing the crime, but gave statements claiming that he was ordered to commit the crime out of duress by a mastermind who assaulted him and threatened to kill his girlfriend and his family. He also claimed he did so to get money to pay off his debts before he later denied any knowledge of the contents of his bundle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pannir Selvam Pranthaman</span> Convicted drug trafficker on death row in Singapore

Pannir Selvam a/l Pranthaman is a Malaysian drug trafficker who was convicted of trafficking 51.84g of heroin at Woodlands Checkpoint in September 2014. Pannir, who was not certified as a drug courier, was sentenced to death in Singapore for his crime in May 2017. After his appeal was dismissed in February 2018, Pannir and his family submitted various clemency petitions, which were all rejected on 17 May 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cheong Chun Yin</span> Convicted drug trafficker sentenced to life imprisonment in Singapore

Cheong Chun Yin is a Malaysian former death row convict who is currently serving a life sentence in Singapore for drug trafficking. Cheong and a female accomplice were both convicted of trafficking of 2,726g of heroin into Singapore from Myanmar in 2008, and sentenced to death by hanging in 2010. Cheong submitted multiple unsuccessful appeals against his sentence; his case, similar to Yong Vui Kong's, received much attention in the media, at a time when activists argued for Singapore to abolish the death penalty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Datchinamurthy Kataiah</span> Malaysian drug convict on death row in Singapore

Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah is a Malaysian man who was sentenced to death in Singapore for drug trafficking. Datchinamurthy was convicted of trafficking nearly 45g of heroin across the Woodlands Checkpoint from Malaysia to Singapore in January 2011. Having been convicted of the crime and also not certified as a courier, Datchinamurthy was sentenced to death in 2015. He had a co-accused, Christeen d/o Jayamany, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for the same offence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abdul Kahar Othman</span> Singaporean drug convict executed in 2022

Abdul Kahar bin Othman was a Singaporean drug trafficker who was found guilty in 2013 of two charges of trafficking a total of 66.77 grams of heroin in Singapore, and later sentenced to death by the High Court in February 2015. After the end of his trial, Abdul Kahar tried to appeal the verdict but the courts dismissed his legal challenges and upheld his death sentence.

Gobi a/l Avedian is a Malaysian drug convict who is currently serving a 15-year term of imprisonment in Singapore for attempted importation of a Class C drug. Gobi was at first, charged in 2014 with the capital charge of trafficking over 40.22g of heroin, which attracts the death penalty in Singapore. In his defence, Gobi stated that he was unaware he was carrying heroin and thought he was carrying "chocolate drugs" as what his two friends told him when he received an offer to deliver the drugs for money to pay his daughter's surgery fees.

Norasharee bin Gous was a Singaporean who was found guilty of soliciting a man named Mohamad Yazid Md Yusof to traffic 120.90g of diamorphine (heroin). Upon the courier's arrest on 23 October 2013, Norasharee was not arrested until July 2015, and he was charged with abetting and instigating Yazid to commit drug trafficking. A third co-accused, Kalwant Singh Jogindar Singh, was also arrested on the same date and venue as Yazid and charged in court for drug trafficking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalwant Singh (drug trafficker)</span> Malaysian drug trafficker executed in Singapore in 2022

Kalwant Singh a/l Jogindar Singh was a Malaysian drug trafficker who was found guilty of having 60.15g of diamorphine (heroin) in his possession and trafficking 120.90g of the same substance. Kalwant along with another man named Mohamad Yazid Md Yusof were arrested on 23 October 2013, and the alleged mastermind Norasharee Gous was captured two years later in July 2015, and all three of them were charged with drug trafficking. It was alleged that Norasharee had told Yazid to help import the diamorphine after meeting up with Kalwant, who was to carry the drugs in Singapore to pass on to Yazid for the purpose of trafficking. Kalwant, however, denied that he had knowledge of the drugs and alleged that he was given death threats that forced him to help do the job without knowing it was drugs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nazeri Lajim</span> Singaporean hanged in 2022 for drug trafficking

Nazeri bin Lajim, full name Nazeri bin Lajim Hertslet, was a Singaporean drug trafficker. Prior to his arrest in April 2012, Nazeri went to prison several times for drug consumption and several other drug offences, and was said to be addicted to drugs at age 14. Nazeri and his Malaysian accomplice were both brought to trial and found guilty five years later on 8 August 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life imprisonment in Singapore</span>

Life imprisonment is a legal penalty in Singapore. This sentence is applicable for more than forty offences under Singapore law, such as culpable homicide not amounting to murder, attempted murder, kidnapping by ransom, criminal breach of trust by a public servant, voluntarily causing grievous hurt with dangerous weapons, and trafficking of firearms, in addition to caning or a fine for certain offences that warrant life imprisonment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rozman Jusoh</span> Malaysian hanged in Singapore for drug trafficking in 1996

Rozman bin Jusoh was a Malaysian convicted drug trafficker. He and his childhood friend Razali bin Mat Zin were both arrested in Singapore for two separate charges of trafficking 1.04 kg of marijuana and 943.3g of the same substance, as a result of an undercover operation facilitated by the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB). It was decreed by Singapore law that trafficking 500g of marijuana or more was punishable by death.

Vignes s/o Mourthi was a Malaysian convicted drug trafficker who was found guilty of trafficking 27.65 grams of diamorphine on 20 September 2001. After the end of his trial in August 2002, Vignes and his accomplice Moorthy a/l Angappan were both sentenced to death since the death penalty was mandatory for the amount trafficked by the duo. Despite the immense evidence against him, Vignes maintained his innocence and appealed many times to overturn his conviction and sentence. Ultimately, Vignes was put to death alongside Moorthy as scheduled on 26 September 2003. His execution remained a controversy even in the aftermath due to his insistent claims of innocence.

Saridewi binte Djamani was a Singaporean who was sentenced to death in 2018 for trafficking 1 kg of drug containing 30.72g of heroin. Saridewi, who committed the offence on 17 June 2016, was arrested on the same day together with the drug courier at her HDB block in Anchorvale Road, Sengkang. Saridewi, who had a long history of drug abuse, did not deny that she sold the drugs but she stated that a majority of the heroin was meant for her own consumption while less than half of the heroin was for sale, and she only stocked up the drug supply for the fasting month Ramadan.

Roszaidi bin Osman is a Singaporean drug trafficker who is presently serving a life sentence for trafficking in 32.54g of diamorphine in October 2015. Roszaidi and four others were all arrested and charged with capital drug trafficking, though eventually, in January 2019, only Roszaidi and one accomplice out of the remaining four were found guilty as charged and sentenced to death. The remaining three, including Roszaidi's wife, were given jail terms ranging between 25 years and life.

References

  1. Happy birthday, Vui Kong, 23 January 2011, The Star (Malaysia)
  2. "大马华裔新加坡运毒被免除死罪 下跪答谢法官(图)" [Yong Vui Kong escaped gallows, knelt and thanked the judge]. China News (in Chinese). 15 November 2013. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
  3. "杨伟光逃过死刑 跪谢法官" [Yong Vui Kong escaped gallows, knelt and thanked the judge]. Oriental Daily (in Chinese). 14 November 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  4. "新加坡通过滥用毒品修正法 有条件免除强制性死刑" [Singapore approves reforms of drug laws, with conditional reprieve from mandatory death penalty]. Radio Free Asia (in Chinese). 14 November 2012. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
  5. Young Malaysian Facing Execution in Singapore Archived 22 March 2010 at the Wayback Machine Asian Center for the Progress of Peoples, 10 November 2009.
  6. "Drug courier spared the gallows". AsiaOne. 17 November 2013. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  7. Save Vui Kong: Yong Vui Kong's journey.
  8. Misuse of Drugs Act ( Cap. 185,2001 Rev. Ed. ).
  9. Save Malaysian on death row in Singapore, Loyar Burok (Malaysian law blog).
  10. "'Govt aware Yong could escape gallows, but changes to law made for society's benefit'". The Straits Times. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 14 November 2021.
  11. Glimmer of hope for Vui Kong, by Roger Tan, The Sunday Star, 23 September 2012.
  12. "Death penalty lifted for Yong Vui Kong". Today. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
  13. "Drug Mule Yong Vui Kong Escapes Death". The Independent. 14 November 2013. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
  14. "Abdul Nasir bin Amer Hamsah v Public Prosecutor". Webcite. Archived from the original on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
  15. "Drug courier spared the gallows". AsiaOne. 17 November 2013. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  16. Death penalty lifted for Yong Vui Kong TODAY Online, 14 November 2013.
  17. Lum, Selina (4 March 2015). "Caning is constitutional, Court of Appeal rules in drug trafficker's case". The Straits Times. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  18. Lum, Selina (24 November 2013). "A street urchin's journey to Death Row and back". The Straits Times. Retrieved 21 October 2021.