Zhou dynasty nobility

Last updated May 13, 2024

The nobility of the Zhou dynasty refers to the power dynamics of the aristocracy in Zhou dynasty China. The nobility interacted with the royal apparatus of state across multiple dimensions of relationship, and in ways that changed over time. This has been subject to considerable misunderstanding due to a philosophical attempt to project backwards in time upon the Western Zhou dynasty a systematization of noble titles where none existed. In translation, these misunderstandings have been compounded by an enduring false equivalence between titles of Zhou nobles and those of European feudal peers, as well as inattention to context in certain use cases. Chinese bronze inscriptions and other archaeologically excavated texts have helped clarify the historical situation.

Western Zhou

The Zhou dynasty grew out of a predynastic polity with its own existing power structure, primarily organized as a set of culturally affiliated kinship groups. The defining characteristics of a noble were their ancestral temple surname (姓; xíng), their lineage line within that ancestral surname, and seniority within that lineage line.^[1]

Shortly after the Zhou conquest of Shang (1046 or 1045 BCE), the immediate goal of the nascent dynasty was to consolidate its power over its newly expanded geographical range, especially in light of the Rebellion of the Three Guards following the death of the conquering King Wu of Zhou. To this end, royal relatives were granted lands outside the old Zhou homeland, and given relatively sovereign authority over those spaces.^[2]

The Zhou government thus had multiple dimensions of relationship with different sorts of powerful men. The lineage elders of the old homelands were related to the royal house mostly through the pre-existing kinship structure, and not all were politically subservient.^[3] The regional lords were established to provide a screen to the royal lands and exert control over culturally distinct polities and were mostly defined by that responsibility, but this was also embedded in the kinship groups. Some few high government ministers had special, non-hereditary titles of nobility. Lastly, there were the leaders of polities outside the Zhou cultural sphere.^[4] This complicated set of dynamics gave rise to the following set of terms.

Gong

Gong (公; gōng) was a term of highest respect, and can be rendered in English as Lord to a high level of accuracy.^[5]^[6] The original meaning seems to have been "senior lineage male", cognate with wēng (翁; 'respected elder').^[7]

The leaders of existing Zhou cultural polities within the same ancestral temple surname as the royal house (Jī; 姬), such as Guo (虢), were rarely called Gong,^[8] in which case, it also carried the meaning patriarch.^[9]^[10] The rulers of Song, descended from the royal house of Shang, also bore this title.^[6]

The three highest government ministers in the early Zhou were the Grand Tutor (太傅; tàifù), the Grand Protector (太保; tàibǎo), and the Grand Preceptor (太師; tàishī). These men were called Gong, although their descendants did not inherit this title. The system of three was not always in effect throughout the dynasty, but there was often one or more ministers set above the rest of the government, always called Gong regardless of specific title.^[11]

In their own ancestral temple, any ancestor of suitable distance and regardless of noble title in life could be referred to as Gong. This practice increased over time, with lineages "upgrading" their ancestors without discernible pattern.^[6]^[11]^[12]

Within their own polity, any living ruler could be addressed as, or referred to as, Gong, which carries the English connotation of e.g. your Grace or his Excellency.^[6]

Hou

Hou (侯; hòu) were the regional lords, rulers of the border states, appointed from a pool of close relatives by the early Zhou court to project force and secure the dynasty. Modern English scholarship also renders this term as lord or as regional lord. They form a geographically bounded set, outside the predynastic Zhou homeland.^[13] A 2012 study found no difference in grade between Gong and Hou.^[14]

Bo

Bo (伯; bó) is generically a birth order term, signifying the eldest son. The most senior male of their lineage line was called Bo, which can be roughly encapsulated by the translation Elder.^[15]

The most senior male members of ancestral temples with a different surname than the royal house were called Bo, as well as the most senior male members of the cadet lineages of the same ancestral temple surname as the royal house. Although these men had land and power, their relationship to the aristocracy was foremost conceptualized as one of extended kinship.^[11]

In the old Zhou homeland, less senior members of their lineage branch referred to themselves by the appropriate birth order term: 仲; zhōng; 'second', 叔; shū; 'younger', or 季; jī; 'youngest'.^[13]

Complicating matters, the rulers of some smaller polities such as Qin, Zheng, and Cao were also called Bo, in which case the term did have overtly political meaning.^[6]

Zi

Zi (子; zǐ) carried a number of meanings highly dependent upon use case. Its base meaning is "child" or "son". The sons of rulers could be referred to with zi appended to their personal name. In this sense, zi also appeared in compound words such as Wangzi or Gongzi, where it has the meaning of scion.^[16] Living rulers could be referred to as Zi while still in their ritually stipulated mourning periods for their recently deceased fathers.^[17]^[18]

More frequently, zi signifies a sense of respect. It is commonly found appended to the names of nobles when they are referred to posthumously. This use found its way to the names of influential thinkers of later periods, giving us Kongzi (Confucius), Laozi (Lao Tzu), Zhuangzi, and many others. In this sense, it has been fruitfully rendered as master, and lent its name in this sense to an entire literary genre.^[19]Zi could also be prepended to a person's courtesy name, as in the case of the Zheng statesman Zichan, or of Zilu, disciple of Confucius.^[18] In this sense, it can be conceptualized as carrying the meaning Sir, or "the Honourable".^[20]Zi was also used as a polite second-person pronoun, also translated sir or rarely, madam.^[18]

Saliently, Zi was also used to refer to rulers of polities outside the Zhou cultural sphere, such as Chu, Wu, and Yue. In this sense, it had the meaning Ruler or unratified lord,^[21] in that the Zhou king did not recognize the ruler's sovereignty. In most cases (including all three examples), these men referred to themselves as King (王; wáng).

As a final wrinkle to understanding this word in this topic area, it was also the lineage surname of the kings of the preceding Shang dynasty.^[19] It has many other meanings in Chinese, some quite ancient.

Other

The noble title Nan (男; nán), with the base meaning "male" or "adult human male", is attested in two cases of rulers of Zhou cultural polities: Xu (許) and Su (宿).^[22] A 2012 study found no difference in grade between Zi and Nan.^[14]

The title Dian (甸; diàn) appears in the received literature, but is not epigraphically attested as a title as of 2008^[update].^[23] It does appear as a common noun.^[24]

Wang (王; wáng; 'King') was also sometimes used as a self-identifier of rulers within the Zhou homeland whose position in the ancestral temple kinship group was senior to that of the Zhou royal ancestor, King Wen. In this case, the polity in question was neither entirely within the cultural sphere nor completely distinct from it, but the adoption of the title Wang signified that it did not recognize royal authority over it.^[3]

Eastern Zhou

The political upheavals that marked the boundary between the two halves of the Zhou dynasty saw central authority and power dramatically weaken, and the movement of people out of the old Zhou homeland has been archaeologically established. Culture groups outside the Zhou sphere began to adopt pieces of state apparatus similar to those used by the Zhou, and refer to themselves in the same kind of terms.^[25]

The new geopolitical situation put regional states and minor polities in direct contact with each other, where previously they had interacted mostly through the central government and their relation to the royal house. Under this new regime, they self-organized into a much more systematized structure.^[25] One individual who is well attested in this process was the previously mentioned Zichan, who both submitted a memorial to the king of Chu informing him of the proposed new system in 538 BCE, and argued at a 529 BCE interstate conference that tributes should be graded based on rank, given the disparity in available resources.^[26]

Alongside this development, there was precedent of Zhou kings "upgrading" noble ranks as a reward for service to the throne, giving the recipients a bit more diplomatic prestige without costing the royal house any land.^[5]

Archaeologically excavated primary sources and received literature agree to a high degree of systematization and stability in noble titles during the Eastern Zhou, indicating an actual historical process. A 2007 survey of bronze inscriptions from 31 states found only eight polities whose rulers used varying titles of nobility to describe themselves.^[27]

Confucian ideal

It is against this backdrop of self-organizing systematization that thinkers of the traditionalist school began to conceive of a lost ideal, a strictly graded system of noble titles and enfeoffments from the time of the early Western Zhou.^[10] First articulated by Mencius,^[28] this fiction found its way into important classical works, which were subsequently canonized in the Han dynasty, becoming accepted historical truth in the process.^[29]

Under this scheme, the "five ranks" were ordered as gong, hou, bo, zi, nan. Each was apportioned a set amount of land. This unsubstantiated hypothesis survives in the received literature in the Rites of Zhou and the Liji .^[30]

In the Eastern Han and Western Jin dynasties, the "traditional" Confucian five-rank system was actually put into practice with minor modifications, finally manifesting this historical fiction as political fact.^[31]

English malapropism

Qing dynasty Empress Dowager Cixi inveighed upon visitors to translate the five ranks into English. Working with the terminology of European feudalism, they gave us the familiar "duke" for gong, "marquess" for hou, "earl" for bo, "viscount" for zi, and "baron" for nan.^[32] This scheme has persisted in the English literature ever since. A Marxist interpretation of history (particularly fashionable in China during the middle of the twentieth century), with its distinct concept of "feudal" and inapposite adoption of the term fengjian to articulate it, has further muddied historical understanding of the organization of aristocratic power structures in early China.

Modern scholarship of Zhou-era China has focused on the examination of bronze inscriptions and other archaeologically excavated records as primary sources to establish a more accurate picture of political dynamics. Some scholars have written at length in an attempt to deprecate fully any feudal terminology in the field of early Chinese studies,^[33]^[34] some wearily call it out when they see it but don't go out of their way to persuade others to abandon it,^[35] and others continue to employ it as a rough and pedagogically neutral heuristic.^[36]

Women

Unlike the preceding Shang dynasty, which featured women such as Fu Hao and Xiao Chen Tao in positions of authority in military and religious institutions, the highly patriarchal Zhou^[37] appear by all accounts to have concentrated official political power exclusively in the hands of men. With a handful of rare exceptions,^[38]^[39] women appear in the epigraphic record in the context of dowries, instruments for building alliances between powerful families. Apart from birth order terms,^[40] the only noble titles they are associated with are zi, in its sense of "child of a powerful man",^[18] and more commonly, sheng (甥; shēng), a term without close analogue that indicates a relationship to a particular family, either by blood or by marriage.^[41] Women certainly wielded some power, but the contexts in which they did were not regularly entered into the historical record.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zhou dynasty</span> Chinese dynasty from 1046 BC to 256 BC

The Zhou dynasty was a royal dynasty of China that existed for 789 years from c. 1046 BC until 256 BC, the longest such reign in Chinese history. During the Western Zhou period, the royal house, surnamed Ji, had military control over ancient China. Even as Zhou suzerainty became increasingly ceremonial over the following Eastern Zhou period (771–256 BC), the political system created by the Zhou royal house survived in some form for several additional centuries. A date of 1046 BC for the Zhou's establishment is supported by the Xia–Shang–Zhou Chronology Project and David Pankenier, but David Nivison and Edward L. Shaughnessy date the establishment to 1045 BC.

The Spring and Autumn period in Chinese history lasted approximately from 770 to 481 BCE which corresponds roughly to the first half of the Eastern Zhou period. The period's name derives from the Spring and Autumn Annals, a chronicle of the state of Lu between 722 and 481 BCE, which tradition associates with Confucius. During this period, royal control over the various local polities eroded as regional lords increasingly exercised political autonomy, negotiating their own alliances, waging wars amongst themselves, up to defying the king's court in Luoyi. The gradual Partition of Jin, one of the most powerful states, is generally considered to mark the end of the Spring and Autumn period and the beginning of the Warring States period.

The Mandate of Heaven is a Chinese political ideology that was used in Ancient China and Imperial China to legitimize the rule of the king or emperor of China. According to this doctrine, Heaven bestows its mandate on a virtuous ruler. This ruler, the Son of Heaven, was the supreme universal monarch, who ruled Tianxia. If a ruler was overthrown, this was interpreted as an indication that the ruler was unworthy and had lost the mandate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese nobility</span> Traditional social structure of Ancient China and Imperial China

The nobility of China represented the upper strata of aristocracy in premodern China, acting as the ruling class until c. 1000 CE, and remaining a significant feature of the traditional social structure until the end of the imperial period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qi (state)</span> Zhou dynasty Chinese state (1046–221 BCE)

Qi, or Ch'i in Wade–Giles romanization, was a regional state of the Zhou dynasty in ancient China, whose rulers held titles of Hou (侯), then Gong, before declaring themselves independent Kings. Its capital was Linzi, located in present-day Shandong. Qi was founded shortly after the Zhou conquest of Shang, c. 1046 BCE. Its first monarch was Jiang Ziya, minister of King Wen and a legendary figure in Chinese culture. His family ruled Qi for several centuries before it was replaced by the Tian family in 386 BCE. Qi was the final surviving state to be annexed by Qin during its unification of China.

Gong was a title of ancient and imperial Chinese nobility roughly equivalent to and usually translated as duke. It was also historically used within Chinese fiefs as a respectful term of address to any living liege and is still used in modern Chinese as a respectful term of address for any man of high status, particularly for the honored deceased as with formal reference to Chiang Kai-shek as Jiǎng Gōng on Taiwan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wu Ding</span> King of the Shang dynasty, ancient China

Wu Ding ; personal name Zi Zhao (子昭), was a king of the Chinese Shang dynasty who ruled the central Yellow River valley c. 1250 – 1200 BCE. He is the earliest figure in Chinese history mentioned in contemporary records. The annals of the Shang dynasty compiled by later historians were once thought to be little more than legends until oracle script inscriptions on bones dating from his reign were unearthed at the ruins of his capital Yin in 1899. Oracle bone inscriptions from his reign have been radiocarbon dated to 1254–1197 BC ±10 years, closely according with regnal dates derived by modern scholars from received texts, epigraphic evidence, and astronomical calculations.

The Battle of Muye, Mu, or Muh took place in ancient China between the rebel Zhou state and the reigning Shang dynasty. The Zhou army, led by Wu of Zhou, defeated the defending army of king Di Xin of Shang at Muye and captured the Shang capital Yin, ending the Shang dynasty. The Zhou victory led to the establishment of the Zhou dynasty, and is used in Chinese historiography as a justified example of the doctrine of the Mandate of Heaven.

King Wen of Zhou was the posthumous title given to Ji Chang, the patriarch of the Zhou state during the final years of Shang dynasty in ancient China. Ji Chang himself died before the end of the Zhou-Shang War, and his second son Ji Fa completed the conquest of Shang following the Battle of Muye, and posthumously honored him as the founder of the Zhou dynasty. Many of the hymns of the Classic of Poetry are praises to the legacy of King Wen. Some consider him the first epic hero of Chinese history.

Fēngjiàn was a governance system in Ancient China and Imperial China, whose social structure formed a decentralized system of confederation-like government. The ruling class consisted of the Son of Heaven and aristocracy, and the lower class consisted of commoners categorized into four occupations. Elite bonds through affinal relations and submission to the overlordship of the king date back to the Shang dynasty, but it was the Western Zhou dynasty when the Zhou kings enfeoffed their clan relatives and fellow warriors as vassals. Through the fengjian system, the king would allocate an area of land to a noble, establishing him as the ruler of that region and allowing his title and fief to be legitimately inherited by his descendants. This created large numbers of local autonomous dynastic domains.

Marquis Jing of Jin, Ancestral name is Ji (姬), given name is Yijiu (宜臼), was the sixth ruler of the state of Jin during the Western Zhou Dynasty. After his father, Marquis Li of Jin died, he ascended the throne of Jin.

The State of Xu was an independent Huaiyi state of the Chinese Bronze Age that was ruled by the Ying family (嬴) and controlled much of the Huai River valley for at least two centuries. It was centered in northern Jiangsu and Anhui.

Guifang was an ancient ethnonym for a northern people that fought against the Shang Dynasty. Chinese historical tradition used various names, at different periods, for northern tribes such as Guifang, Rong, Di, Xunyu, Xianyun, or Xiongnu peoples. This Chinese exonym combines gui and fang, a suffix referring to "non-Shang or enemy countries that existed in and beyond the borders of the Shang polity."

Ancient Chinese states were dynastic polities of China within and without the Zhou cultural sphere prior to Qin's wars of unification. They ranged in size from large estates, to city-states to much vaster territories with multiple population centers. Many of these submitted to royal authority, but many did not—even those that shared the same culture and ancestral temple surname as the ruling house. Prior to the Zhou conquest of Shang, the first of these ancient states were already extant as units of the preceding Shang dynasty, Predynastic Zhou, or polities of other cultural groups. Once the Zhou had established themselves, they made grants of land and relative local autonomy to kinfolk in return for military support and tributes, under a system known as fengjian.

King Tai of Zhou or Gugong Danfu was a great leader of the Zhou clan during the Shang dynasty. His great-grandson Fa would later conquer the Shang and establish the Zhou dynasty.

The Rebellion of the Three Guards, or less commonly the Wu Geng Rebellion, was a civil war, instigated by an alliance of discontent Zhou princes, Shang loyalists, vassal states and other non-Zhou peoples against the Western Zhou government under the Duke of Zhou's regency in late 11th century BC.

The Predynastic Zhou or Proto-Zhou refers to the state of Zhou that existed in the Guanzhong region of modern Shaanxi province during the Shang dynasty of ancient China, before its conquest of the Shang in 1046/1045 BC which led to the establishment of the Zhou dynasty. It was ruled by the Ji clan. According to histories, Predynastic Zhou rose as a western vassal of the Shang, acting as its ally until their influence surpassed that of the dynasty.

Wén and wǔ are a conceptual pair in Chinese philosophy and political culture describing opposition and complementarity of civil and military realms of government. Differentiation between wen and wu was engaged in discussions on criminal punishment, administrative control, creation and reproduction of social order, education and moral transformation.

Shi, Duke of Shao, born Ji Shi, posthumous name Kang (康), also known as Lord Shao or Duke of Shao, was a high-ranking minister of the early Zhou dynasty. He was a member of the royal clan, the founding lineage head of the state of Yan, and elder of the minor polity Shao. After King Wu of Zhou's death, Lord Shao supported the Duke of Zhou in his regency and helped suppress the Rebellion of the Three Guards. He remained a major figure at court for decades.

Weizi, also spelled Wei Tsze, was the first ruler of Song. He was the subject of Chapter 18 of the Analects of Confucius.

References

Citations

↑ Chun 1990, p. 31.
↑ Li 2008b, pp. 33, 43–44.
1 2 Khayutina 2014, pp. 46–48.
↑ Li 2008a, p. 114.
1 2 Chen and Pines 2018, p. 5.
1 2 3 4 5 Pines 2020, p. 716.
↑ Goldin (2021), p. 476.
↑ Li 2008b, p. 49.
↑ Khayutina 2014, p. 47.
1 2 Falkenhausen 1996, p. 7.
1 2 3 Li 2008a, p. 113.
↑ Khayutina 2014, p. 48.
1 2 Li 2008a, p. 112.
1 2 Wei 2012, abstract.
↑ Chen and Pines 2018, pp. 16–17.
↑ Pines 2014, p. 318.
↑ Li 2008a, p. 118.
1 2 3 4 Pines 2020, p. 717.
1 2 Pines 2020, p. 718.
↑ Milburn 2016, p. 67.
↑ Milburn 2016, p. 64.
↑ Pines 2020, p. 715.
↑ Li 2008a, p. 121.
↑ Shang and Li (2010), p. 64.
1 2 Li 2008a, pp. 120–123.
↑ Li 2008a, pp. 123–124.
↑ Li 2008a, pp. 115–118.
↑ Li 2008a, p. 106.
↑ Li 2008a, pp. 126.
↑ Li 2008a, p. 107–108.
↑ Li 2008a, pp. 127.
↑ Creel 1970, p. 325.
↑ Li 2003.
↑ Blakeley 1976.
↑ Loewe 2007, p. 197.
↑ Milburn 2016, p. 68.
↑ Chun 1990, p. 20.
↑ Khayutina 2014, pp. 76–88.
↑ Pines 2006, p. 19.
↑ Khayutina 2014, p. 46, 51.
↑ Khayutina 2014, p. 62.

Sources

Blakeley, Barry B. (1976). "On the "Feudal" Interpretation of Chou China". Early China. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 35–37. doi:10.1017/S0362502800004703. JSTOR 23351276.
Chen Minzhen; Pines, Yuri (2018). "Where is King Ping? The History and Historiography of the Zhou Dynasty's Eastward Relocation". Asia Major. 31 (1). Academica Sinica: 1–27. JSTOR 26571325.
Chun, Allen J. (1990). "Conceptions of Kinship and Kingship in Classical Chou China". T'oung Pao. 76 (1/3). Leiden: Brill: 16–48. doi:10.1163/156853290X00029. JSTOR 4528471.
Creel, Herrlee G. (1970). The Origins of Statecraft in China, vol. 1: The Western Chou Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Falkenhausen, Lothar von (1996). "The Concept of Wen in the Ancient Chinese Ancestral Cult". Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR). 18: 1–22. doi:10.2307/495623. JSTOR 495623.
Goldin, Paul R. (2021). "Etymological Notes on Early Chinese Aristocratic Titles". T'oung Pao. 107 (3/4). Leiden: Brill: 475–480. doi:10.1163/15685322-10703005.
Li Feng (2003). ""Feudalism" and Western Zhou China: a criticism". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 63 (1). Harvard-Yenching Institute: 115–144. doi:10.2307/25066693. JSTOR 25066693.
Li Feng (2008a). "Transmitting Antiquity: The Origin and Paradigmization of the "Five Ranks"". In Dieter Kuhn; Helga Stahl (eds.). Perceptions of Antiquity in Chinese Civilization. Würzberg: Würzburger Sinologische Schriften. pp. 103–134.
Li Feng (2008b). Bureaucracy and the State in Early China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88447-1.
Khayutina, Maria (2014). "Marital alliances and affinal relatives (sheng 甥 and 婚購) in the society and politics of Zhou China in the light of bronze inscriptions". Early China. 37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 39–99. doi:10.1017/eac.2014.7. JSTOR 24392462.
Loewe, Michael (2007). "Review: The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han by Mark Edward Lewis; The Rise of the Chinese Empire; vol. I: Nation, State, and Imperialism in Early China, vol. II: Frontier, Immigration, and Empire in Han China by Chang Chun-shu". Early China. 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 193–225. doi:10.1017/S036250280000184X. JSTOR 23354216.
Milburn, Olivia (2016). "The Xinian: an ancient historical text from the Qinghua University collection of bamboo books". Early China. 39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 53–109. doi:10.1017/eac.2016.2. JSTOR 44075753.
Pines, Yuri (2006). "Biases and their sources: Qin history in the Shiji". Oriens Extremus. 45. Harrassowitz Verlag: 10–34. JSTOR 24047638.
Pines, Yuri (2014). "Zhou History and Historiography: Introducing the Bamboo manuscript Xinian". T'oung Pao. 100 (4/5). Leiden: Brill: 287–324. doi:10.1163/15685322-10045P01. JSTOR 24754918.
Pines, Yuri (2020). "Names and Titles in Eastern Zhou Texts". T'oung Pao. 106 (5/6). Leiden: Brill: 714–720. doi:10.1163/15685322-10656P06.
Shang Yantao (商豔濤); Li Xiaohua (李小華) (2010). 西周金文所見與征伐相關的幾種活動[War-related Activities Recorded in the Bronze Inscriptions of Western Zhou]. Journal of Oriental Studies. 43 (1/2): 59–75. JSTOR 23500623.
Wei Peng 魏芃 (2012), The "five ranks of nobility" in the Western Zhou and Spring–Autumn periods: a study西周春秋時期“五等爵稱”研究, Nankai University: PhD dissertation