2008 California Proposition 11

Last updated

Proposition 11 of 2008 (or the Voters FIRST Act) was a law enacted by California voters that placed the power to draw electoral boundaries for State Assembly and State Senate districts in a Citizens Redistricting Commission, as opposed to the State Legislature. To do this the Act amended both the Constitution of California and the Government Code. [1] The law was proposed by means of the initiative process and was put to voters as part of the November 4, 2008 state elections. In 2010, voters passed Proposition 20 which extended the Citizen Redistricting Commission's power to draw electoral boundaries to include U.S. House seats as well.

Contents

Provisions

The Act amended Article XXI of the state constitution and enacted Title 2, Division 1, Chapter 3.2 of the Government Code. These changes transfer authority for establishing Assembly, Senate, and Board of Equalization district boundaries from elected representatives to a fourteen-member commission. The commission is chosen as follows:

  1. Government auditors select sixty registered voters from an applicant pool.
  2. Legislative leaders are permitted to reduce the pool.
  3. Auditors then pick eight commission members by lottery, and those commissioners pick six additional members for a total of fourteen.

The commission must include five commissioners of the largest political party in California (in practice the Democrats), five commissioners from the second largest party (currently the Republicans), and four of neither party. For approval, new district boundaries need votes from three commissioners of the largest party, three from the second largest, and three of the commissioners from neither party. The commission may hire lawyers and consultants to assist it in its work.

The state legislature retains responsibility for drawing district boundaries for California's Congressional Districts, but the Act adds additional criteria that the legislature must follow in drawing those boundaries.

Supporters

California Common Cause was the advocacy group sponsoring the initiative.

Others supporting the initiative include

Newspaper Editorial boards in favor

Arguments in favor of Prop. 11

Notable arguments that have been made in favor of Prop. 11 include:

Donors supporting Prop 11

As of September 24, three campaign committees supporting Prop. 11 have filed officially with the Secretary of State's office. Some donors have contributed to more than one of these committees. The largest donors altogether are:

City of Pasadena endorses

On Monday, March 10, 2008 the Pasadena City Council became the first California city to endorse the proposition. [13]

Path to the ballot

Kimball Petition Management was paid $2,332,988 from two separate campaign committees to collect signatures to put this measure on the ballot. [14] [15] [16] [17] Signatures to qualify the measure for the California 2008 ballot measures|November 2008 ballot were submitted to election officials on May 6, 2008. On June 17, the California Secretary of State announced that a check of the signatures had established that the measure qualifies for the ballot., [18] [19]

Supporters file campaign financing complaint

In late August, supporters of Prop. 11 filed a complaint with the Fair Political Practices Commission because the California Correctional Peace Officers Associationa group that opposes Prop. 11gave contributions totaling $577,000 to the Leadership California committee, which is a campaign committee associated with state senate leader Don Perata. The Prop. 11 group said that it was wrong for the police officers union to give the money to the Perata committee rather than directly to the No on 11, and also alleged that the police union was trying to curry favor with Perata. Days later, the FPPC took the rare step of rejecting the complaint without conducting an investigation. [20] [21]

Opposition

The official committee set up to oppose Proposition 11 was called "Citizens for Accountability; No on Proposition 11". [22] Paul Hefner is the spokesman for the "No on 11" effort. [23]

Opponents to Prop. 11 include

Arguments against Prop. 11

Arguments that have been claimed in opposition to Prop. 11 include:

Democrat against Democrat

Kathay Feng, the main author of the initiative, and director of California Common Cause, said in late June that since the measure qualified for the ballot and the California Democratic Party had announced its opposition, there had been an attempt to bring everybody into line and to encourage those in support of the measure to oppose it. [27]

Donations to opposition campaign

As of September 24, the opposition committee, "Citizens for Accountability; No on 11", had raised $350,000:

Polling information

A poll released on July 22, 2008 by Field Poll showed Proposition 11 with 42% support and 30% opposition. [29] A late August poll released by the Public Policy Institute of California showed Prop. 11 with 39% of voters in support. [30]

Month of PollPolling companyIn FavorOpposedUndecided
July 2008 Field 42 percent30 percent28 percent
August 2008 PPIC 39 percent36 percent25 percent
Sept. 2008 PPIC 38 percent33 percent29 percent [31]

Result of vote

Electoral results by county. 2008 California Proposition 11 results map by county.svg
Electoral results by county.
Proposition 11 [32]
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes6,095,03350.82
No5,897,65549.18
Valid votes11,992,68887.26
Invalid or blank votes1,750,48912.74
Total votes13,743,177100.00

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2000 California Proposition 22</span> Referendum in California on same-sex marriage ban

Proposition 22 was a law enacted by California voters in March 2000 stating that marriage was between one man and one woman. In November 2008, Proposition 8 was also passed by voters, again only allowing marriage between one man and one woman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don Perata</span> American politician

Don Richard Perata is a California lobbyist and former Democratic politician, who was President pro tempore of the California State Senate from 2004 to 2008. He came in second place in the November 2010 election for Mayor of Oakland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2005 California special election</span>

The California special election of 2005 was held on November 8, 2005 after being called by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on June 13, 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2005 California Proposition 74</span> Ballot proposition in the 2005 California special election

Proposition 74 (2005) was a ballot proposition in the 2005 California special election that intended to extend probationary periods for the state's public school teachers from two years to five before attaining tenure. It failed at the polls, with 55% of voters rejecting it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in California</span>

Electoral reform in California refers to efforts to change election and voting laws in the U.S. state of California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 4</span> Failed ballot proposition on abortion

Proposition 4, or the Abortion Waiting Period and Parental Notification Initiative, also known to its supporters as Sarah's Law, was an initiative state constitutional amendment in the 2008 California general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 8</span> Ballot proposition and state constitutional amendment passed in November 2008

Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 6</span> Rejected statutory initiative

California Proposition 6, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act and The Runner Initiative, is a statutory initiative that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. This proposition was rejected by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 3</span> Californian law

Proposition 3 is a law that was enacted by California voters by means of the initiative process. It is a bond issue that authorizes $980 million in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing and equipping of children's hospitals. The annual payment on the debt authorized by the initiative is approximately $64 million a year. Altogether, the measure would cost about $1.9 billion over 30 years out of California's general fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 5</span> 2008 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act was an initiated state statute that appeared as a ballot measure on the November 2008 ballot in California. It was disapproved by voters on November 4 of that year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 7</span> 2008 California ballot proposition

California Proposition 7, would have required California utilities to procure half of their power from renewable resources by 2025. In order to make that goal, levels of production of solar, wind and other renewable energy resources would more than quadruple from their current output of 10.9%. It would also require California utilities to increase their purchase of electricity generated from renewable resources by 2% annually to meet Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) requirements of 40% in 2020 and 50% in 2025. Current law AB32 requires an RPS of 20% by 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 California Proposition 10</span> Ballot measure in California

California Proposition 10, also known as the California Alternative Fuels Initiative, was an unsuccessful initiated state statute that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. Proposition 10 was funded by Clean Energy Fuels Corp., a corporation owned by T. Boone Pickens. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. is the nation's leading operator of natural gas vehicle fueling stations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California elections</span>

The California state elections, November 2010 were held on November 2, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 23</span> Ballot proposition concerned with environmental regulations

Proposition 23 was a California ballot proposition that was on the November 2, 2010 California statewide ballot. It was defeated by California voters during the statewide election by a 23% margin. If passed, it would have suspended AB 32, a law enacted in 2006, legally referred to its long name, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Sponsors of the initiative referred to their measure as the California Jobs Initiative while opponents called it the Dirty Energy Prop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 20</span> Approved Congressional Redistricting Initiative

A California Congressional Redistricting Initiative, Proposition 20 was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California. It was approved by 61.2% of voters. Election officials announced on May 5 that the proposition had collected sufficient signatures to qualify for the ballot. The measure is known by its supporters as the VOTERS FIRST Act for Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 27</span> Ballot measure in California

Proposition 27 was an unsuccessful ballot proposition on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California, placed there by the initiative process. If approved, this measure would have repealed California Proposition 11 (2008), which authorized the creation of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission to draw the electoral boundaries for State Assembly and State Senate districts. It would also have modified the provision in California law that says that proposed congressional districts can't be subjected to a veto referendum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">November 2012 California elections</span>

The California state elections was held on Election Day, November 6, 2012. On the ballot were eleven propositions, various parties' nominees for the United States presidency, the Class I Senator to the United States Senate, all of California's seats to the House of Representatives, all of the seats of the State Assembly, and all odd-numbered seats of the State Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 California Proposition 19</span> Failed measure to legalize marijuana

California Proposition 19 was a ballot initiative on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot. It was defeated, with 53.5% of California voters voting "No" and 46.5% voting "Yes." If passed, it would have legalized various marijuana-related activities, allowed local governments to regulate these activities, permitted local governments to impose and collect marijuana-related fees and taxes, and authorized various criminal and civil penalties. In March 2010, it qualified to be on the November statewide ballot. The proposition required a simple majority in order to pass, and would have taken effect the day after the election. Yes on 19 was the official advocacy group for the initiative and California Public Safety Institute: No On Proposition 19 was the official opposition group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 California Proposition 39</span> Ballot measure in California modifying corporate tax burdens

Proposition 39 is a ballot initiative in the state of California that modifies the way out-of-state corporations calculate their income tax burdens. The proposition was approved by voters in the November 6 general election, with 61.1% voting in favor of it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redistricting in California</span>

Redistricting in California has historically been highly controversial. Critics have accused legislators of attempting to protect themselves from competition by gerrymandering districts. Conflicts between the governor and the legislature during redistricting often have only been resolved by the courts.

References

  1. "Full text of Proposition 11" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-22. Retrieved 2008-10-01.
  2. Arnold in Remap X Archived 2011-05-19 at the Wayback Machine , Newsblog, Dec. 3, 2007
  3. Governor to lead effort to pass redistrict measure, San Jose Mercury News, Dec. 4, 2007
  4. 1 2 "News from California, the nation and world". Los Angeles Times .
  5. "Why Californians should support Prop. 11". SFGate. 12 September 2008.
  6. Voters First Ballot Language Archived 2008-09-18 at the Wayback Machine
  7. Proposition 11 arguments in the California voter's guide Archived 2008-10-02 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Field Poll makes case for Prop 11, backers say Archived 2008-09-22 at the Wayback Machine
  9. "Sacramento Bee, "Budget signed, Schwarzenegger sets sights on re-districting", September 24, 2008". Archived from the original on 2008-09-27. Retrieved 2008-10-01.
  10. Record of donors to Prop 11
  11. Mercury News, Fundraising, alliances on agenda during Schwarzenegger trip, April 16, 2008
  12. 1 2 3 "Schwarzenegger takes in a pair of GOP-sponsored fundraisers for redistricting measure". 17 October 2008.
  13. Pasadena Now, City Council Endorses Redistricting Reform Initiative, March 11, 2008 Archived October 7, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  14. Expenditure detail for Voters First
  15. Expenditure detail for the California Dream Team
  16. September 4, John Wildermuth on; PM, 2008 at 1:12 (4 September 2008). "John Wildermuth: The Governor, the Money and Prop. 11". Politics Blog. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  17. Rose Report, "Common Cause/League of Women Voters Support Redistricting Reform" Archived 2009-06-04 at the Wayback Machine
  18. KPBS News, Governor Schwarzenegger Submits Redistricting Initiative Archived 2008-10-12 at the Wayback Machine , May 7, 2008
  19. Governor to chair drive to qualify redistricting measure, San Diego Union-Tribune, Dec. 3, 2007
  20. "FindArticles.com - CBSi". findarticles.com.
  21. "Money-laundering suit washes out". 18 September 2008.
  22. No on Prop. 11
  23. August 13, John Wildermuth on; PM, 2008 at 4:30 (13 August 2008). "Democrats Break Ranks on Prop. 11". Politics Blog. Archived from the original on 12 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  24. Arguments against Prop. 11 from the "No on 11" website
  25. "FEC sets fundraising cap on ballot measure". The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on 2008-10-11. Retrieved 2008-10-01.
  26. "Governor to chair drive to qualify redistricting measure, Fresno Bee, Dec. 3, 2007".[ permanent dead link ]
  27. Contra Costa Times, Democratic leaders accused of pressuring supporters of redistricting measure, June 21, 2008
  28. Details of $5,000+ donations to No on 11
  29. "July 22 Field Poll results on Proposition 11" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-17. Retrieved 2008-10-01.
  30. "Complaint filed over union's contributions to Perata". 28 August 2008.
  31. Wildermuth, John (25 September 2008). "Poll: Same-sex marriage ban not wooing voters". SFGate.
  32. "Statement of Vote: 2008 General Election" (PDF). California Secretary of State. 2008-12-13. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-18.

Further reading