Abundant number

Last updated
Demonstration, with Cuisenaire rods, of the abundance of the number 12 Abundant number Cuisenaire rods 12.png
Demonstration, with Cuisenaire rods, of the abundance of the number 12

In number theory, an abundant number or excessive number is a positive integer for which the sum of its proper divisors is greater than the number. The integer 12 is the first abundant number. Its proper divisors are 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 for a total of 16. The amount by which the sum exceeds the number is the abundance. The number 12 has an abundance of 4, for example.

Contents

Definition

An abundant number is a natural number n for which the sum of divisors σ(n) satisfies σ(n) > 2n, or, equivalently, the sum of proper divisors (or aliquot sum) s(n) satisfies s(n) > n.

The abundance of a natural number is the integer σ(n) − 2n (equivalently, s(n) − n).

Examples

The first 28 abundant numbers are:

12, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, 40, 42, 48, 54, 56, 60, 66, 70, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 90, 96, 100, 102, 104, 108, 112, 114, 120, ... (sequence A005101 in the OEIS ).

For example, the proper divisors of 24 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12, whose sum is 36. Because 36 is greater than 24, the number 24 is abundant. Its abundance is 36  24 = 12.

Properties

Let
a
(
n
)
{\displaystyle a(n)}
be the number of abundant numbers not exceeding
n
{\displaystyle n}
. Plot of
a
(
n
)
/
n
{\displaystyle a(n)/n}
for
n
<
10
6
{\displaystyle n<10^{6}}
(with
n
{\displaystyle n}
log-scaled) Proportion of abundant numbers.svg
Let be the number of abundant numbers not exceeding . Plot of for (with log-scaled)

Every multiple of an abundant number is abundant. [1] For example, one can see that every multiple of 20 (including 20 itself) is abundant because if n is a multiple of 20 then Similarly, every multiple of a perfect number (except the perfect number itself) is abundant. [1] For example, every multiple n of 6 greater than 6 is abundant because An abundant number that is not the multiple of an abundant number or perfect number (i.e., whose proper divisors are all deficient) is called a primitive abundant number.

Unlike for perfect numbers, even and odd abundant numbers are known to exist. The smallest odd abundant number is 945. Consequently, infinitely many abundant numbers exist with each parity. The smallest abundant number that is not divisible by 2 or by 3 is 5391411025; its distinct prime factors are 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, and 29. An algorithm given by Iannucci in 2005 shows how to find the smallest abundant number not divisible by the first k primes (sequence A047802 in the OEIS ). [2] If represents the smallest abundant number not divisible by the first k primes then for all we have for sufficiently large k.

The set of abundant numbers has a non-zero natural density: that is, as N grows large, the fraction of the natural numbers less than N that are abundant approaches a constant. This limiting fraction is lies between 0.2476171 and 0.2476475. [3] [4] [5]

The first pair of consecutive abundant numbers is (5775, 5776), and the first consecutive triple is (171078830, 171078831, 171078832) (sequence A094268 in the OEIS ). Let be the length of the longest run of consecutive abundant numbers not exceeding . Paul Erdős (1935) showed that there exists two constants such that for all sufficiently large . [6] As a matter of fact, the limit exists, with value lying between 3.24 and 3.54. [7]

Every integer greater than 20161 can be written as the sum of two abundant numbers. The largest even number that is not the sum of two abundant numbers is 46. [8]

Euler diagram of numbers under 100:
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Abundant
Primitive abundant
Highly abundant
Superabundant and highly composite
Colossally abundant and superior highly composite
Weird
Perfect
Composite
Deficient Euler diagram numbers with many divisors.svg
Euler diagram of numbers under 100:
  Abundant
   Weird
   Perfect
   Composite
   Deficient

Numbers whose sum of proper factors equals the number itself (such as 6 and 28) are called perfect numbers, while numbers whose sum of proper factors is less than the number itself are called deficient numbers. The first known classification of numbers as deficient, perfect or abundant was by Nicomachus in his Introductio Arithmetica (circa 100 AD), which described abundant numbers as like deformed animals with too many limbs.

The abundancy index of n is the ratio σ(n)/n. [9] A number whose abundancy index is greater than any lower number is called a superabundant number (sequence A004394 in the OEIS ). Distinct numbers n1, n2, ... (whether abundant or not) with the same abundancy index are called friendly numbers.

The sequence (ak) of least numbers n such that σ(n) > kn, in which a2 = 12 corresponds to the first abundant number, grows very quickly (sequence A134716 in the OEIS ).

The smallest odd integer with abundancy index exceeding 3 is 1018976683725 = 33 × 52 × 72 × 11 × 13 × 17 × 19 × 23 × 29. [10]

If p = (p1, ..., pn) is a list of primes, then p is termed abundant if some integer composed only of primes in p is abundant. A necessary and sufficient condition for this is that the product of pi/(pi − 1) be > 2. [11]

A number n for which the sum of its divisors (including itself) is greater than the sum of the divisors of any smaller natural number is called a highly abundant number.

An abundant number which is not a semiperfect number is called a weird number. [12] An abundant number with abundance 1 is called a quasiperfect number, although none have yet been found.

References

  1. 1 2 Tattersall (2005) p.134
  2. D. Iannucci (2005), "On the smallest abundant number not divisible by the first k primes" , Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society , 12 (1): 39–44, doi:10.36045/bbms/1113318127
  3. Hall, Richard R.; Tenenbaum, Gérald (1988). Divisors. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Vol. 90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 95. ISBN   978-0-521-34056-4. Zbl   0653.10001.
  4. Deléglise, Marc (1998). "Bounds for the density of abundant integers". Experimental Mathematics. 7 (2): 137–143. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.36.8272 . doi:10.1080/10586458.1998.10504363. ISSN   1058-6458. MR   1677091. Zbl   0923.11127.
  5. Kobayashi, Mitsuo (2010), "On the density of abundant numbers" , Dartmouth Dissertations: 1–239, doi:10.1349/ddlp.1662
  6. Erdős, Paul (1935), "Note on consecutive abundant numbers" (PDF), Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 10: 128–131
  7. Chen, Yong-Gao; Lv, Hui (2016), On consecutive abundant numbers
  8. Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "SequenceA048242(Numbers that are not the sum of two abundant numbers)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences . OEIS Foundation.
  9. Laatsch, Richard (1986). "Measuring the abundancy of integers". Mathematics Magazine . 59 (2): 84–92. doi:10.2307/2690424. ISSN   0025-570X. JSTOR   2690424. MR   0835144. Zbl   0601.10003.
  10. For smallest odd integer k with abundancy index exceeding n, see Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "SequenceA119240(Least odd number k such that sigma(k)/k >= n.)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences . OEIS Foundation.
  11. Friedman, Charles N. (1993). "Sums of divisors and Egyptian fractions". Journal of Number Theory . 44 (3): 328–339. doi: 10.1006/jnth.1993.1057 . MR   1233293. Zbl   0781.11015.
  12. Tattersall (2005) p.144