Censorship of student media in the United States

Last updated

The censorship of student media in the United States is the suppression of student-run news operations' free speech by school administrative bodies, typically state schools. This consists of schools using their authority to control the funding and distribution of publications, taking down articles, and preventing distribution. Some forms of student media censorship extend to expression not funded by or under the official auspices of the school system or college (for example, confiscating independently produced underground publications or imposing discipline for material posted on off-campus websites).

Contents

Current legal precedent implies that pupils are not responsible enough to be trusted with constitutional rights and school faculty are allowed to suppress student speech that is deemed to provoke controversy or disrupt learning. Scholars maintain that this type of censorship violates the constitutional right of free speech that young people are afforded under the First Amendment. [1] Opponents of this legal censorship, such as the Student Press Law Center, a non-profit that tracks and provides pro-bono legal aid to student-run media organizations in the U.S, point to the civic and educational value in student expression that is used to organize reform movements and develop political opinions as reasons to encourage unimpeded student journalism. [2]

History

In 1988, the Supreme Court declared 5-3 that student newspapers do not have the same freedoms and safeguards as professional media. The case was the result of the school administration of Hazelwood East High School in Missouri forbidding the publication of two newspaper stories regarding abortion and divorce in 1983. Cathy Kuhlmeier, a student reporter, claimed that the move violated her First Amendment rights. The Court decided that student newspapers were never meant to be public forums and as a result, administrators began to regulate high school and college periodicals. [3]

In response to the Supreme Court's decision on the Hazelwood, several states have enacted legislation to counteract the ruling and protect school publications from interference. [4] The Student Press Law Center started worked with student journalists to lobby state legislatures to adopt New Voices, a law intended to fortify student journalists' right to free expression. By 2013, the states of Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, and Oregon had all passed the legislation. [5]

Notable cases in the United States include:

First Amendment

The First Amendment protects the people to exercise their rights of free speech as well as the freedom of the press in journalistic practice. [12] Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, schools been allowed to censor speech in student media for “legitimate pedagogical concern”. [1] Because pedagogical concern lacked a clear definition, it was interpreted differently by different people. Some states have passed legislation that strengthens the free speech rights of student journalists by clearly defining when and where school administration can censor student media and protecting school employees from retribution for supporting the free speech rights of student journalists. [13]

Censored topics

Based on interview and survey data, student media topics that are censored include sexual assault, politics, athletics, women’s reproductive rights, and the #MeToo movement. [12] In 2021, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education found that 60% of student newspapers at four-year public institutions faced some form of censorship. [14]

Instances of censorship

  • Fauquier High School's paper, the Falconer, had a story that covered drugs taken down by their principal in 2015. [15]
  • Student journalists for The Telegraph at Herriman High School published a story in January 2018 about a teacher at their school who was fired for allegedly inappropriately texting a female student and school administrators shut down their website. [16] [17] [18]
  • The principal of Prosper High School was accused of censorship in May 2018 when he prevented the publication of editorials by student journalists. [19] 17 different organizations, including the National Coalition Against Censorship, Society of Professional Journalists, and the National Scholastic Press Association came together to write a public letter to the school district urging them to stop the censorship. [20]
  • In 2019, Bear Creek High School's student newspaper was met with legal disputes from their school district when they attempted to publish an article covering pornography. The district also threatened to block the story and fire the paper’s longtime faculty adviser, but ultimately allowed its publication after pressure from the attention their actions had generated in nationwide press. [21] [16] [22]
  • The Pearl Post, the independent newspaper at Daniel Pearl Magnet High School, reported in 2022 the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on school staff and noted that after the vaccine mandate was put in place, the school librarian did not show up for school. The former librarian and school administration demanded that any reference to her be removed from the story, but after receiving legal counsel that their reporting of the librarian's name was licit, they chose to keep it in, and the newspaper's advisor was issued a three-day suspension in retaliation. [23] [24]
  • In May 2022, Northwest Public Schools in Nebraska shut down the Viking Saga high school student newspaper for reporting two stories on LGBT issues. [25] [26] [27]

Impact of censorship

Work such as student activism and protests are heavily obstructed by the censorship of school newspapers. Often when student media, news, or other outlets are challenged or removed without cause other than to censor, the student body suffers a lack of cohesion as the sharing of opinions and information is attacked. This delegitimizes democracy by way of removing the belief that the government, or the school in this case, is responsive to their wishes. [12]

States with laws protecting the free speech of student journalists

As of 2022, sixteen states have passed New Voices legislation in order to provide some protection of the First Amendment rights of student journalists. [28]

Student Press Freedom day

Student Press Freedom day is a national day of student journalists and their contributions celebrated annually since 2020. [29] [14] It has been endorsed by the following organizations: [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Tattler</i> (student newspaper)

The Tattler is the student newspaper of Ithaca High School in Ithaca, New York. Founded in 1892, it is one of the oldest student newspapers in the United States. It is published twelve times a year and has a circulation of about 3,000, with distribution in both the school and in the community.

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that defined First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools. The Tinker test, also known as the "substantial disruption" test, is still used by courts today to determine whether a school's interest to prevent disruption infringes upon students' First Amendment rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of speech in the United States</span> Overview of the human rights history in the North American country

In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws. Freedom of speech, also called free speech, means the free and public expression of opinions without censorship, interference and restraint by the government. The term "freedom of speech" embedded in the First Amendment encompasses the decision what to say as well as what not to say. The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized several categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment and has recognized that governments may enact reasonable time, place, or manner restrictions on speech. The First Amendment's constitutional right of free speech, which is applicable to state and local governments under the incorporation doctrine, prevents only government restrictions on speech, not restrictions imposed by private individuals or businesses unless they are acting on behalf of the government. However, It can be restricted by time, place and manner in limited circumstances. Some laws may restrict the ability of private businesses and individuals from restricting the speech of others, such as employment laws that restrict employers' ability to prevent employees from disclosing their salary to coworkers or attempting to organize a labor union.

Prior restraint is censorship imposed, usually by a government or institution, on expression, that prohibits particular instances of expression. It is in contrast to censorship that establishes general subject matter restrictions and reviews a particular instance of expression only after the expression has taken place.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student publication</span> Media outlet run by students

A student publication is a media outlet such as a newspaper, magazine, television show, or radio station produced by students at an educational institution. These publications typically cover local and school-related news, but they may also report on national or international news as well. Most student publications are either part of a curricular class or run as an extracurricular activity.

<i>Dean v. Utica Community Schools</i> 2004 United States legal case

Dean v. Utica Community Schools, 345 F. Supp. 2d 799, is a landmark legal case in United States constitutional law, namely on how the First Amendment applies to censorship in a public school environment. The case expanded on the ruling definitions of the Supreme Court case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, in which a high school journalism-oriented trial on censorship limited the First Amendment right to freedom of expression in curricular student newspapers. The case consisted of Utica High School Principal Richard Machesky ordering the deletion of an article in the Arrow, the high school's newspaper, a decision later deemed "unreasonable" and "unconstitutional" by District Judge Arthur Tarnow.

Freedom of the press in the United States is legally protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

In the United States, censorship involves the suppression of speech or public communication and raises issues of freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Interpretation of this fundamental freedom has varied since its enshrinement. Traditionally, the First Amendment was regarded as applying only to the Federal government, leaving the states and local communities free to censor or not. As the applicability of states rights in lawmaking vis-a-vis citizens' national rights began to wane in the wake of the Civil War, censorship by any level of government eventually came under scrutiny, but not without resistance. For example, in recent decades, censorial restraints increased during the 1950s period of widespread anti-communist sentiment, as exemplified by the hearings of the House Committee on Un-American Activities. In Miller v. California (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court found that the First Amendment's freedom of speech does not apply to obscenity, which can, therefore, be censored. While certain forms of hate speech are legal so long as they do not turn to action or incite others to commit illegal acts, more severe forms have led to people or groups being denied marching permits or the Westboro Baptist Church being sued, although the initial adverse ruling against the latter was later overturned on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court case Snyder v. Phelps.

Censorship in Israel is officially carried out by the Israeli Military Censor, a unit in the Israeli government officially tasked with carrying out preventive censorship regarding the publication of information that might affect the security of Israel. The body is headed by the Israeli Chief Censor, a military official appointed by Israel's Minister of Defense, who bestows upon the Chief Censor the authority to suppress information he deems compromising from being made public in the media, such as Israel's nuclear weapons program and Israel's military operations outside its borders. On average, 2240 press articles in Israel are censored by the Israeli Military Censor each year, approximately 240 of which in full, and around 2000 partially.

<i>Desilets v. Clearview Regional Board of Education</i> New Jersey Supreme Court decision

Desilets v. Clearview Regional Board of Education, 137 N.J. 585 (1994), was a New Jersey Supreme Court decision that held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student expression or newspapers established as forums for student expression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student Press Law Center</span> American non-profit organization promoting student press freedom

The Student Press Law Center (SPLC) is a non-profit organization that aims to promote, support and defend press freedom rights for student journalists at high schools and colleges in the United States. It is dedicated to student free-press rights and provides information, advice and legal assistance at no charge for students and educators.

<i>Guiles v. Marineau</i>

In Guiles v. Marineau, 461 F.3d 320, cert. denied by 127 S.Ct. 3054 (2007), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States protect the right of a student in the public schools to wear a shirt insulting the President of the United States and depicting images relating to drugs and alcohol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Education Code 48907</span>

California Education Code 48907 (1977), also known as the California Student Free Expression Law, acts as a counter to the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) Supreme Court ruling, which limited the freedom of speech granted to public high school newspapers. The Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier decision held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as "forums for student expression" are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student expression or newspapers established as forums for student expression. Ed Code 48907 affirms the right of high school newspapers to publish whatever they choose, so long as the content isn't explicitly obscene, libelous, or slanderous, and doesn’t incite students to violate any laws or school regulations. The newspaper content must also pass the minimal disruption test set forth in the Supreme Court ruling on Tinker v. Des Moines (1969). In contrast with Hazelwood, which limited First Amendment protection to only those high school newspapers that had, through practice or policy, been established as forums for student expression, Ed Code 48907 affirms the right of all newspapers to the freedom of expression.

The issue of school speech or curricular speech as it relates to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution has been the center of controversy and litigation since the mid-20th century. The First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech applies to students in the public schools. In the landmark decision Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the U.S. Supreme Court formally recognized that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate".

<i>Hosty v. Carter</i>

Hosty v. Carter was a 2005 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that limited the free press rights of college newspapers.

Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student expression or newspapers established as forums for student expression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frank LoMonte</span> American lawyer

Frank D. LoMonte is an American lawyer and journalist known for his press freedom advocacy. He is the director of the Brechner Center for Freedom of Information, part of the University of Florida's College of Journalism and Communications, and was previously the executive director of the Student Press Law Center from 2008 to 2017.

<i>The Classic</i> (newspaper) US student newspaper

The Classic is the student-run high school newspaper of Townsend Harris High School in Queens, New York. Frequently named the best high school newspaper in New York City by Baruch College's NYC public school journalism awards, the paper has run free of censorship and administrative review since its founding in the fall of 1984. In recent years, reporting by The Classic has been cited by publications like The New York Times, The Washington Post, The New York Post, The Wall Street Journal, and the Associated Press. Classic journalists have also been featured in various publications, including Teen Vogue, The Village Voice, and The New York Times. The paper publishes new content online on weeknights throughout the school year and publishes a print edition of collected pieces on a quarterly basis.

<i>Viking Saga</i> censorship incident 2022 student newspaper incident in Grand Island, Nebraska

In June 2022, the Viking Saga, the student newspaper of Northwest High School in Grand Island, Nebraska, in the United States, published an issue that discussed Pride Month and other LGBTQ-related topics. In response, the school board and superintendent eliminated the school's journalism program and closed down the paper. The newspaper had been advised that transgender staff should not use their preferred names on bylines, and must use the names they had been given at birth.

References

  1. 1 2 LoMonte, Frank (2021-01-01). "Censorship Makes the School Look Bad: Why Courts and Educators Must Embrace the "Passionate Conversation"". Washington University Journal of Law & Policy . 65 (1). ISSN   1533-4686.
  2. ↑ Grau, Mel (2020-05-03). "Poynter supports world press freedom. Here's how you can, too". Poynter. Retrieved 2022-10-30.
  3. ↑ McGowan, Bailey (2013-01-14). "25 years later, a look at one generation under Hazelwood". Student Press Law Center. Retrieved 2022-10-30.
  4. ↑ Schulten, Katherine (2022-09-22). "Banned Books, Censored Topics: Teaching About the Battle Over What Students Should Learn". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-10-30.
  5. ↑ Student Press Law Center. "Student Press Law center – Law Library". SPLC. Retrieved 2013-11-11.
  6. ↑ "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District". Oyez . Retrieved 2022-10-27.
  7. ↑ "Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier". Student Press Law Center . Retrieved 2020-04-15.
  8. ↑ "Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier". Oyez . Retrieved 2022-10-27.
  9. ↑ "Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667 (1973)". media.okstate.edu. Retrieved 2022-10-28.
  10. ↑ "Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia". Oyez. Retrieved 2022-10-27.
  11. ↑ "Morse v. Frederick". Oyez. Retrieved 2022-10-27.
  12. 1 2 3 Moreno, Julia (2019). "The Student Journalist and Student Media Adviser Perspective of Censorship in Student Media at Public Universities across the United States". University of Nevada.
  13. ↑ McHale, Thomas (2022-04-01). "New Voices Law strengthens student journalists' First Amendment rights". New Jersey Education Association. Retrieved 2022-10-30.
  14. 1 2 Conza, Sabrina (2022-02-23). "As FIRE launches student press initiative, student journalists continue to face censorship around every corner". FIRE . Retrieved 2022-10-30.
  15. ↑ Balingit, Moriah (2015-04-05). "A principal yanked a drug article from a student newspaper, so it ran online". Washington Post.
  16. 1 2 Proulx, Natalie (2019-05-09). "Should Schools Be Allowed to Censor Student Newspapers?". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  17. ↑ Rosenberg, Eli (2018-01-24). "Their school deleted an article on a teacher's firing. So these teens published it themselves". Washington Post .
  18. ↑ "Student Journalists Launch Website After They Say School Censored Their Paper". NPR.org. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  19. ↑ "Prosper High School journalists allege newspaper censorship by principal, fight editorial policy". Dallas News. 2018-05-25. Retrieved 2023-01-11.
  20. ↑ "SPLC sends letter to Texas school district to stop censoring student media, 17 orgs sign on". Student Press Law Center. 2018-05-31. Retrieved 2023-01-11.
  21. ↑ Hsu, Tiffany (2019-05-03). "Writing About Teenager Who Makes Sex Videos, School Paper Becomes the News". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  22. ↑ "High School Newspaper Battling With District Over Story About Student In Adult Entertainment". CBS News . 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  23. ↑ "The threats facing student journalism". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  24. ↑ "High School Journalists In LA Learn About Censorship — From Their Own Principal". LAist. 2022-09-03. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  25. ↑ "A high school newspaper in Nebraska was shut down after it published LGBTQ stories". NPR.org. Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  26. ↑ Votipka, Jessica (2022-08-24). "'Nurseries of democracy': Northwest student journalism elimination a 'Saga'". The Grand Island Independent . Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  27. ↑ Medina, Eduardo (2022-08-29). "Nebraska School Shuts Down Student Newspaper After L.G.B.T.Q. Publication". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-12-21.
  28. ↑ Strauss, Valerie (2017-04-05). "What protections do student journalists really have? Check your state on this map". Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2022-10-28.
  29. ↑ "Student Press Law Center | Student Press Freedom Day — Jan. 29, 2020". Student Press Law Center. 2020-01-01. Retrieved 2020-01-30.
  30. ↑ "Student Press Law Center | Student Press Freedom Day — Jan. 29, 2020". Student Press Law Center. 2020-01-01. Retrieved 2020-04-15.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.