Pig farming

Last updated

Large White piglets on a farm JEFO-Pigs.jpg
Large White piglets on a farm
A Large White sow suckling her piglets Suckling pigs.JPG
A Large White sow suckling her piglets
Interior of pig farm at Bjarka-Saby Castle, Sweden, 1911 NMA.0063325 Interior fran svinhus, Bjarka-Saby, Ostergotland.jpg
Interior of pig farm at Bjärka-Säby Castle, Sweden, 1911

Pig farming, pork farming, or hog farming is the raising and breeding of domestic pigs as livestock, and is a branch of animal husbandry. Pigs are farmed principally for food (e.g. pork: bacon, ham, gammon) and skins.

Contents

Pigs are amenable to many different styles of farming: intensive commercial units, commercial free range enterprises, or extensive farming (being allowed to wander around a village, town or city, or tethered in a simple shelter or kept in a pen outside the owner's house). Historically, farm pigs were kept in small numbers and were closely associated with the residence of the owner, or in the same village or town. [1] They were valued as a source of meat and fat, and for their ability to convert inedible food into meat and manure, and were often fed household food waste when kept on a homestead. [2] Pigs have been farmed to dispose of municipal garbage on a large scale. [3]

All these forms of pig farm are in use today, though intensive farms are by far the most popular, due to their potential to raise a large amount of pigs in a very cost-efficient manner. [4] In developed nations, commercial farms house thousands of pigs in climate-controlled buildings. [5] Pigs are a popular form of livestock, with more than one billion pigs butchered each year worldwide, 100 million in the United States. The majority of pigs are used for human food, but also supply skin, fat and other materials for use in clothing, ingredients for processed foods, [6] cosmetics, [7] and medical use. [8]

Production and trade

Global Pig stock
in 2019
Number in millions
1. Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  People's Republic of China (Mainland)310.4 (36.5%)
2. Flag of Europe.svg  European Union (UK not included)143.1 (16.83%)
3. Flag of the United States (23px).png  United States 78.7 (9.26%)
4. Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil 40.6 (4.77%)
5. Flag of Russia.svg  Russia 23.7 (2.79%)
6. Flag of Myanmar.svg  Myanmar 21.6 (2.54%)
7. Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 19.6 (2.31%)
8. Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico 18.4 (2.16%)
9. Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada 14.1 (1.66%)
10. Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 12.7 (1.49%)

World total850.3
Source: UN Food and Agriculture Organization

Pigs are farmed in many countries, though the main consuming countries are in Asia, meaning there is a significant international and even intercontinental trade in live and slaughtered pigs. Despite having the world's largest herd, China is a net importer of pigs as China consumes about 50% of global pork production. [9] The total amount of pork consumed in China is 57 million tons (as of 2021) and pork accounted for 60 percent of total meat consumption within the country. [10] China has been increasing its imports during its economic development; many within China's population of 1.2 billion people prioritize eating pork as their main consumption of meat, unlike other countries where most people would prioritize having poultry. [10] In addition, since 2007, China possesses a strategic pork reserve with a government mandate to "stabilize live hog prices, prevent excessive hog price drops, which damage the interests of farmers and to ease the negative effects of the cyclical nature of hog production and market prices." In China, the government actively intervened in the pork market during periods of instability by releasing pork reserves into the market whenever hogs get too expensive in China, in order to hold down prices for consumers. Conversely when prices of pork are deemed too low and unsustainable for farmers, the reserve buys up pigs to ensure farmers remain profitable. [11]

The largest exporters of pigs are the United States, the European Union, and Canada. As an example, more than half of Canadian production (22.8 million pigs) in 2008 was exported, going to 143 countries. [12]

Among meat animals, pigs have a lower feed conversion ratio than cattle, which can provide an advantage in lower unit price of meat because the cost of animal feed per kilogram or pound of resultant meat is lower. However, there are also many other economic variables in meat production and distribution, so the price differential of pork and beef at the point of retail sale does not always correspond closely to the differential in feed conversion ratios. Nonetheless, the favorable ratio often tends to make pork affordable relative to beef. [13] [14]

Relationship between handlers and pigs

The way in which a stockperson interacts with pigs affects animal welfare which in some circumstances can correlate with production measures. Many routine interactions can cause fear, which can result in stress and decreased production.

There are various methods of handling pigs which can be separated into those which lead to positive or negative reactions by the animals. These reactions are based on how the pigs interpret a handler's behavior.

Negative interactions

Many negative interactions with pigs arise from stock-people dealing with large numbers of pigs. Because of this, many handlers can become complacent about animal welfare and fail to ensure positive interactions with pigs. Negative interactions include overly heavy tactile interactions (slaps, punches, kicks, and bites), the use of electric goads and fast movements. It can also include killing them. However, it is not a commonly held view that death is a negative interaction. These interactions can result in fear in the animals, which can develop into stress. Overly heavy tactile interactions can cause increased basal cortisol levels (a "stress" hormone). [15] Negative interactions that cause fear mean the escape reactions of the pigs can be extremely vigorous, thereby risking injury to both stock and handlers. Stress can result in immunosuppression, [16] leading to an increased susceptibility to disease. Studies have shown that these negative handling techniques result in an overall reduction in growth rates of pigs.

"In Canada the Federal government does not regulate the treatment on farms and most provinces have animal cruelty legislation but they typically contain expectations for general agricultural practices." Due to this lack of legislation, this perpetuates to the cruel treatment of swine. [17] "The NFACC codes of practice are developed larger by the industry and are not enforced with third party oversight." [17]

Positive interactions

Various interactions can be considered either positive or neutral. Neutral interactions are considered positive because, in conjunction with positive interactions, they contribute to an overall non-negative relationship between a stock-person and the stock. Pigs are often fearful of fast movements. When entering a pen, it is good practice for a stock-person to enter with slow and deliberate movements. These minimize fear and therefore reduce stress. Pigs are very curious animals. Allowing the pigs to approach and smell whilst patting or resting a hand on the pig's back are examples of positive behavior. Pigs also respond positively to verbal interaction. Minimizing fear of humans allow handlers to perform husbandry practices in a safer and more efficient manner. By reducing stress, stock are made more comfortable to feed when near handlers, resulting in increased productivity. [18]

Impacts on sow breeding

Hogs raised in confinement systems tend to produce 23.5 piglets per year. Between 2013 and 2016, sow death rates nearly doubled in the United States, from 5.8 to 10.2 percent. 25 to 50 percent of deaths were caused by prolapse. [19]

Other probable causes of death include vitamin deficiency, mycotoxins in feed, high density diets or abdominal issues. [20] Iowa's Pork Industry Center collects mortality data in collaboration with the National Pork Board to collect data from over 400,000 sows from 16 U.S. states. The farms range in size and facility types. Increasing death rates are a profit concern to the industry, so money is invested into research to find solutions. [21]

Genetic manipulation

Pigs were originally bred to rapidly gain weight and backfat in the late 1980s. In a more fat-conscious modern day America, pigs are now being bred to have less back fat and produce more offspring, which pushes the sow's body too far and is deemed one of the causes of the current prolapse epidemic. Researchers and veterinarians are seeking ways to positively impact the health of the hogs and benefit the hog business without taking much from the economy. [22]

Terminology

Pigs are extensively farmed, and therefore the terminology is well developed:

Pigs for slaughter

Finishing pigs on a farm NRCSAR83008 - Arkansas (279)(NRCS Photo Gallery).jpg
Finishing pigs on a farm

Groups

Pig parts

Biology

Housing

Pig farm in Vampula, Finland Pig farm Vampula 9.jpg
Pig farm in Vampula, Finland

Environmental and health impacts

Feces and waste often spread to surrounding neighborhoods, polluting air and water with toxic waste particles. [25] Waste from swine on these farms carry a host of pathogens and bacteria as well as heavy metals. These toxins can leach down through the soil into groundwater, polluting local drinking water supplies. Pathogens can also become airborne, polluting the air and harming individuals when ingested. [26] Contents from waste have been shown to cause detrimental health implications, as well as harmful algal blooms in surrounding bodies of water. [27] Due to Concentrated Animal Feed Operations (CAFOs), those who live in the surrounding areas of pig farms tend to experience health complications. Symptoms included headaches, nausea, and weakness due to the fumes that are emitted from these farms.[ citation needed ] Those who work directly inside these farms often experience these symptoms more intensely. Typically, workers of these farms experience respiratory issues such as wheezing, coughing, and tightness of the chest as well as eye and nasal irritation. [28] This is in part due to the air quality being poor because of the air particles being contaminated with hog feces.[ citation needed ]

Little to no regulation has been written by the EPA and federal legislators surrounding CAFOs to protect the welfare of both the environment and humans from their impacts. [29] The only permit required by federal law on wastewater runoff by CAFOs is the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. NPDES are authorized under the Clean Water Act and aim to reduce dumping of pollutants in water systems. [30] However, one of the most detrimental waste management practices used at swine farms, manure lagoons, have little to no regulations surrounding waste management, as they are not connected to a moving water source and therefore is not seen as an imminent threat to human or environmental health. [31]

Occupational Hazards

Common occupational hazards faced by pig farmers include but are not limited to exposure to toxic gases and particulate matter. [32] [33] [34] The Occupational Safety and Health Administration or OSHA sets health and safety standards for hazardous substances in the workplace called permissible exposure limits or PELs. [35] Specific PELs exist for toxic gases and particulate matter and these standards are legally enforced by OSHA to ensure that the safety and health of workers are protected. [35]

Toxic Gas and Particulate Matter Exposure

Toxic gases can accumulate to dangerous levels in pig barns GHS-pictogram-skull.svg
Toxic gases can accumulate to dangerous levels in pig barns

Toxic gases including hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, methane and carbon dioxide are produced as a result of the decomposition of pig feces and these gases become highly concentrated in enclosed spaces of pig barns which can be hazardous to health when inhaled. [36] Carbon monoxide is another commonly associated toxic gas that can accumulate in pig barns as a result of the trapping of combustion byproducts such as malfunctioning furnaces or gas heat sources in the absence of adequate ventilation. [37]

Hydrogen sulfide gas has a foul, "rotten eggs" smell at low concentrations but paralyzes the olfactory nerve at higher concentrations so that no smell is sensed. [38] Exposure to high levels, well beyond the OSHA PEL, of hydrogen sulfide can cause fatal respiratory paralysis. [36] The common source of hydrogen sulfide are covered manure pits below the pig barns that act as feces reservoirs. [38] These manure pits require regular emptying and during this process, high levels of hydrogen sulfide is released and seeps into pig barns. [36] Pig barns must be void of any human or animal inhabitants during this emptying process and require a several hour "waiting period" until occupants can safely reenter the barn. [36]

Ammonia gas has a strong odor that can be smelled at low levels, below the OSA PEL, but does not have any negative health effects. [39] At higher levels, ammonia is irritating to the body's mucous membranes such as the eyes, nose, mouth, throat and lungs. [39] Particulate matter in pig barns often absorbs ammonia as it floats through the air. [40] These particles are then inhaled and increase the irritating effect of ammonia. [40]

Methane and carbon dioxide are combustible gases meaning that they can burn, catch fire or explode easily. [41] They are also known as chemical asphyxiants and at high level can cause suffocation by displacing oxygen from the air. [41]

Particulate matter is produced when small fragments of pig hair or skin, dried feces, or feed can detach and become suspended in the air in pig barns. [40] The increased concentration of particulate matter in the air, especially in confined spaces, can lead to respiratory tract irritation and other health effects when inhaled. [40] Bacteria and viruses, such as influenza, can travel through the air on particulate matter and increase the risk of transmission of disease. [40]

OSHA requires that toxic gas and particulate matter be measured at least twice yearly preferably in the autumn months and again in the winter when natural ventilation is the most reduced. [42] Workers are also advised to wear N-95 respirators and eye protection when inside of pig barns to prevent the inhalation of toxic gases and particulate matter as well as irritation to the of eyes. [43] [42]

Geopolitical issues

As with other commodities, pork presents challenges in the politics of international trade as national interests compete and seek economic modus vivendi. Changes to policy can upset the existing balances, prompting economic anxiety. For example, in 2020, the hog farming sector in Taiwan was upset by a decision to allow imports from the United States without labeling of ractopamine use. [44] Farmers' views varied on how negative the effects might be. [44] Issues of pride and degree of autarky also figure into such debates; people understandably wonder whether trade competition changes will deeply damage domestic production capability, while accurate quantitative answers are often difficult to find amid the mass of debate. [44]

Drugs

Growth promoters

Ractopamine

Most pigs in the US receive ractopamine which promotes muscle instead of fat, quicker weight gain, and reduced costs and pollutants in the environment. Such pigs consume less feed to reach finishing weight and produce less manure. Ractopamine has not been approved for use by the European Union, China, Russia, and several other countries. [45]

Colistin

China once used colistin (an antibiotic) as growth promoter (subtherapeutic antibiotic use) but discovered a colistin-resistant form of E. coli bacteria in a pig from a Shanghai farm in 2013. Investigations then led to the identification of "a gene called MCR-1 that allowed bacteria to survive colistin treatment in animals and humans." [46] In 2016, these findings led China to ban colistin as growth promoter. [46] [47]

Antibiotics

A systematic review found that penicillins and tetracyclines were the most commonly used antibiotics in pigs. [48]

Parasites

Toxoplasmosis is a constant pressure on pig farming. Worldwide, the percentage of pigs harboring viable Toxoplasma gondii parasites has been measured to be 3% to 71.43%. [49] Surveys of seroprevalence (T. gondii antibodies in blood) are more common, and such measurements are indicative of the high relative seroprevalence in pigs across the world. [50] :145–151 Neonatal piglets have been found to suffer the entire range of severity, including progression to stillbirth. [50] :153 [51] :95 This was especially demonstrated in the foundational Thiptara et al. 2006, reporting a litter birth of three stillborns and six live in Thailand. This observation has been relevant not only to that country but to toxoplasmosis control in porciculture around the world. [52] [51] :95 [49]

Hygiene

Excessively hygienic raising conditions were found to prevent proper gut microbiota development by Schmidt et al. 2011. [53] Moore et al. 1995 describes the pathology of Cryptosporidium infection, a common difficulty in piglet production. [54]

In an attempt to curb diseases such as African swine fever, [55] a number of Chinese companies have built condominium-style mega complexes multiple stories high to house thousands of pigs. The buildings have been dubbed "hog hotels" and come with strict protocols and advanced cleaning, veterinary, and disposal systems. [55] [56] However, doubt has been raised by policy specialists and animal scientists over the facilities' efficacy in preventing outbreaks. The welfare of the animals has also been a source of concern, and it has been suggested that the poor welfare of the pigs may cause a decline in their immunity. [57]

See also

Footnotes

  1. Flisser, Ana; Ganaba, Rasmané; Praet, Nicolas; Carabin, Hélène; Millogo, Athanase; Tarnagda, Zékiba; Dorny, Pierre; Hounton, Sennen; Sow, Adama; Nitiéma, Pascal; Cowan, Linda D. (2011). "Factors Associated with the Prevalence of Circulating Antigens to Porcine Cysticercosis in Three Villages of Burkina Faso". PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 5 (1): e927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000927 . PMC   3014946 . PMID   21245913.
  2. Lander, Brian; Schneider, Mindi; Brunson, Katherine (2020). "A History of Pigs in China: From Curious Omnivores to Industrial Pork". The Journal of Asian Studies. 79 (4): 865–889. doi:10.1017/S0021911820000054. S2CID   225700922.
  3. "Full text of "The collection and disposal of municipal waste"". New York, The Municipal Journal and Engineer. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  4. "Where have all the pig farmers gone". ABC Rural. 5 May 2014.
  5. "Swine Extension - Programs | MU Extension". extension.missouri.edu.
  6. "The Lost Art of Cooking With Lard". Mother Earth News. 30 October 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  7. "Ingredient: Lard". cosmeticsinfo.org. Archived from the original on 26 December 2017. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  8. "Material from pig intestine is remedy for deep sores, incontinence". Purdue.edu. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  9. "China's plan to cut meat consumption by 50% cheered by climate campaigners | China | The Guardian". amp.theguardian.com. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  10. 1 2 "Five new trends in China's meat consumption | McKinsey". www.mckinsey.com. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  11. Kemp, Ted (6 June 2013). "Hog Stock: Inside China's Strategic Pork Reserve". CNBC. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  12. "Canadian Pork Exports". Canadapork.com. Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
  13. Ciuraru, Ioana (31 March 2021). "Why Is Pork So Cheap ? 3 Reasons Pork Is Cheaper Than Beef And Any Other Meat". Foodiosity. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  14. "Why Is Pork Cheaper Than Beef? (5 Main Reasons Explained)". 8 June 2022. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  15. Hemsworth, P.H (2003). "Human–animal interactions in livestock production". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 81 (3): 185–98. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0.
  16. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Barnett JL, Borg S (2000). "Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows". Journal of Animal Science. 78 (11): 2821–31. doi:10.2527/2000.78112821x. PMID   11063304.
  17. 1 2 "Humane Society International/Canada demands pork industry quit stalling on phasing out cruel crates for mother pigs". Humane Society International. 12 November 2020. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
  18. Hemsworth, P.H.; Price, E.O.; Borgwardt, R. (1996). "Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli". Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 50 (1): 43–56. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(96)01067-2.
  19. Greenaway, Twilight (1 October 2018). "'We've bred them to their limit': death rates surge for female pigs in the US". the Guardian. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  20. "Considering the porcine future". Big Think. 2 October 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  21. "Iowa Pork Industry Center - Iowa State University". ipic.iastate.edu. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  22. "Genetic manipulation for more salable pork or more pigs". Big Think. 2 October 2018. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  23. Resor, Cynthia (October 2018). "What's a shoat?". teachingwiththemes.com/.
  24. Swine Study Guide Archived 2 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine from UC Davis
  25. Nicole, Wendee (21 April 2017). "CAFOs and Environmental Justice: The Case of North Carolina". Environmental Health Perspectives. 121 (6): a182–a189. doi:10.1289/ehp.121-a182. PMC   3672924 . PMID   23732659.
  26. Thorne, Peter S. (21 April 2017). "Environmental Health Impacts of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Anticipating Hazards—Searching for Solutions". Environmental Health Perspectives. 115 (2): 296–297. doi:10.1289/ehp.8831. PMC   1817701 . PMID   17384781.
  27. Guilford, Gwynn. "It's not just Ohio—poisonous algae blooms now plague 20 US states". Quartz. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
  28. Crook, B.; Robertson, J.F.; Glass, S.A. Travers; Botheroyd, E.M.; Lacey, J.; Topping, M.D. (1 July 1991). "Airborne Dust, Ammonia, Microorganisms, and Antigens in Pig Confinement Houses and the Respiratory Health of Exposed Farm Workers". American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 52 (7): 271–279. doi:10.1080/15298669191364721. ISSN   0002-8894. PMID   1951065.
  29. US EPA, OLEM (5 September 2017). "CERCLA and EPCRA Reporting Requirements for Air Releases of Hazardous Substances from Animal Waste at Farms". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
  30. Gaba, Jeffrey M. (25 March 2007). "Generally Illegal: NPDES General Permits Under the Clean Water Act". SSRN   1555771 . Retrieved 23 November 2021.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  31. p. g. Hunt; a. a. Szögi; f. j. Humenik; j. m. Rice; t. a. Matheny; k. c. Stone (2002). "Constructed Wetlands for Treatment of Swine Wastewater from an Anaerobic Lagoon". Transactions of the ASAE. 45 (3). doi:10.13031/2013.8827 . Retrieved 23 November 2021.
  32. Archibald, Joy (21 July 2015). "Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health CenterOccupational Hazards in Pork Production Associated with Production Practices - Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center" . Retrieved 10 March 2024.
  33. Board, National Pork. "Noise". Pork Information Gateway. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
  34. "NASD - Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Agriculture". nasdonline.org. Retrieved 10 March 2024.
  35. 1 2 "1988 OSHA PEL Project Documentation | NIOSH | CDC". www.cdc.gov. 14 December 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  36. 1 2 3 4 "Toxicities Caused by Gases | Iowa State University". vetmed.iastate.edu. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  37. "Carbon Monoxide Toxicity | Iowa State University". vetmed.iastate.edu. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  38. 1 2 "Safety in Swine Production Systems – Hogs, Pigs, and Pork". swine.extension.org. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  39. 1 2 "Ammonia Toxicity | Iowa State University". vetmed.iastate.edu. Retrieved 22 March 2024.
  40. 1 2 3 4 5 Yang, Xufei; Haleem, Noor; Osabutey, Augustina; Cen, Zhisheng; Albert, Karlee L.; Autenrieth, Daniel (March 2022). "Particulate Matter in Swine Barns: A Comprehensive Review". Atmosphere. 13 (3): 490. Bibcode:2022Atmos..13..490Y. doi: 10.3390/atmos13030490 . ISSN   2073-4433.
  41. 1 2 Donham, Kelley; Aherin, Robert; Baker, David; Hetzel, Glen (2006). Baker, James; Bodman, Gerald; Kerig, Ken; Sweeten, John (eds.). "Safety in Swine Production Systems" (PDF). Fact Sheet: Pork Information Gateway. Retrieved 22 March 2024.
  42. 1 2 Board, National Pork. "Safety in Swine Production Systems". Pork Information Gateway. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  43. "Safety in Swine Production Systems – Hogs, Pigs, and Pork". swine.extension.org. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  44. 1 2 3 Wang, Ann (15 December 2020). "In Taiwan pig country, U.S. pork decision rankles, divides families". Reuters.com. Reuters wire service. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
  45. "Ractopamine — a beta-agonist growth promotant; from google (pig drug accumulate fat) result 3". NPR .
  46. 1 2 "UK-China collaboration informs animal feed antibiotic ban". Medical Research Council. Archived from the original on 27 March 2017.
  47. McKenna, Maryn (21 November 2015). "Apocalypse Pig: The Last Antibiotic Begins to Fail". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 7 October 2018.
  48. Lekagul, Angkana; Tangcharoensathien, Viroj; Yeung, Shunmay (1 June 2019). "Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review". Veterinary and Animal Science. 7: 100058. doi:10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058. ISSN   2451-943X. PMC   7386699 . PMID   32734079.
  49. 1 2 Nissapatorn, Veeranoot; Lau, Yee-Ling; Fong, Mun-Yik (2013). "Toxoplasma gondii: The Parasite in Trend". In Lim, Yvonne Ai Lian; Vythilingam, Indra (eds.). Parasites and their vectors. Vienna: Springer. pp. 155–175. ISBN   978-3-7091-1553-4.
  50. 1 2 Dubey, J. P. (2016). Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. xvii+313. ISBN   978-1-4200-9236-3. OCLC   423572366. ISBN   9781420092363
  51. 1 2 Dubey, J. P. (2009). "Toxoplasmosis in pigs—The last 20 years". Veterinary Parasitology . 164 (2–4). Elsevier: 89–103. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.05.018. ISSN   0304-4017. PMID   19559531.
  52. Dubey & 2016 (154).
  53. Yeoman, Carl J.; White, Bryan A. (1 February 2014). "Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota and Probiotics in Production Animals". Annual Review of Animal Biosciences . 2 (1). Annual Reviews: 469–486. doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114149. ISSN   2165-8102. PMID   25384152.
  54. Uzal, Francisco A.; Plattner, Brandon L.; Hostetter, Jesse M. (2016). "1 Alimentary System". Jubb, Kennedy & Palmer's Pathology of Domestic Animals: Volume 2. Elsevier. pp. 1–257.e2. ISBN   978-0-7020-5318-4.
  55. 1 2 "China is using 13-storey 'hog hotels' to keep pigs safe from disease". The Independent. 2 August 2021. Retrieved 18 November 2022.
  56. "Hog heaven: China builds pig hotels for better biosecurity". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 18 November 2022.
  57. "A 12-storey pig farm: has China found the way to tackle animal disease?". the Guardian. 18 September 2020. Retrieved 18 November 2022.

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<i>Sus</i> (genus) Genus of even-toed ungulates

Sus is the genus of wild and domestic pigs, within the even-toed ungulate family Suidae. Sus include domestic pigs and their ancestor, the common Eurasian wild boar, along with other species. Sus species, like all suids, are native to the Eurasian and African continents, ranging from Europe to the Pacific islands. Suids other than the pig are the babirusa of Indonesia, the pygmy hog of South Asia, the warthogs of Africa, and other pig genera from Africa. The suids are a sister clade to peccaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wild boar</span> Species of mammal

The wild boar, also known as the wild swine, common wild pig, Eurasian wild pig, or simply wild pig, is a suid native to much of Eurasia and North Africa, and has been introduced to the Americas and Oceania. The species is now one of the widest-ranging mammals in the world, as well as the most widespread suiform. It has been assessed as least concern on the IUCN Red List due to its wide range, high numbers, and adaptability to a diversity of habitats. It has become an invasive species in part of its introduced range. Wild boars probably originated in Southeast Asia during the Early Pleistocene and outcompeted other suid species as they spread throughout the Old World.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive pig farming</span> Method of animal husbandry

Intensive pig farming, also known as pig factory farming, is the primary method of pig production, in which grower pigs are housed indoors in group-housing or straw-lined sheds, whilst pregnant sows are housed in gestation crates or pens and give birth in farrowing crates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concentrated animal feeding operation</span> Type of American intensive animal farming

In animal husbandry, a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO), as defined by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), is an intensive animal feeding operation (AFO) in which over 1,000 animal units are confined for over 45 days a year. An animal unit is the equivalent of 1,000 pounds of "live" animal weight. A thousand animal units equates to 700 dairy cows, 1,000 meat cows, 2,500 pigs weighing more than 55 pounds (25 kg), 10,000 pigs weighing under 55 pounds, 10,000 sheep, 55,000 turkeys, 125,000 chickens, or 82,000 egg laying hens or pullets.

An anaerobic lagoon or manure lagoon is a man-made outdoor earthen basin filled with animal waste that undergoes anaerobic respiration as part of a system designed to manage and treat refuse created by concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Anaerobic lagoons are created from a manure slurry, which is washed out from underneath the animal pens and then piped into the lagoon. Sometimes the slurry is placed in an intermediate holding tank under or next to the barns before it is deposited in a lagoon. Once in the lagoon, the manure settles into two layers: a solid or sludge layer and a liquid layer. The manure then undergoes the process of anaerobic respiration, whereby the volatile organic compounds are converted into carbon dioxide and methane. Anaerobic lagoons are usually used to pretreat high strength industrial wastewaters and municipal wastewaters. This allows for preliminary sedimentation of suspended solids as a pretreatment process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pig</span> Domesticated omnivorous even-toed ungulate

The pig, also called swine or hog, is an omnivorous, domesticated, even-toed, hoofed mammal. It is named the domestic pig when distinguishing it from other members of the genus Sus. It is considered a subspecies of Sus scrofa by some authorities, but as a distinct species by others. Pigs were domesticated in the Neolithic, both in East Asia and in the Near East. When domesticated pigs arrived in Europe, they extensively interbred with wild boar but retained their domesticated features.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bushpig</span> Species of mammal

The bushpig is a member of the pig family that inhabits forests, woodland, riverine vegetation and cultivated areas in East and Southern Africa. Probably introduced populations are also present in Madagascar. There have also been unverified reports of their presence on the Comoro island of Mayotte. Bushpigs are mainly nocturnal. There are several subspecies.

Smithfield Hog Production Division, formerly Premium Standard Farms, Inc. (PSF), is a subsidiary of Smithfield Foods, Inc.

<i>African swine fever virus</i> Species of virus

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a large, double-stranded DNA virus in the Asfarviridae family. It is the causative agent of African swine fever (ASF). The virus causes a hemorrhagic fever with high mortality rates in domestic pigs; some isolates can cause death of animals as quickly as a week after infection. It persistently infects its natural hosts, warthogs, bushpigs, and soft ticks of the genus Ornithodoros, which likely act as a vector, with no disease signs. It does not cause disease in humans. ASFV is endemic to sub-Saharan Africa and exists in the wild through a cycle of infection between ticks and wild pigs, bushpigs, and warthogs. The disease was first described after European settlers brought pigs into areas endemic with ASFV, and as such, is an example of an emerging infectious disease.

Smithfield Foods, Inc., is a pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia. It operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chinese-owned conglomerate WH Group. Founded in 1936 as the Smithfield Packing Company by Joseph W. Luter and his son, the company is the largest pig and pork producer in the world. In addition to owning over 500 farms in the US, Smithfield contracts with another 2,000 independent farms around the country to raise Smithfield's pigs. Outside the US, the company has facilities in Mexico, Poland, Romania, Germany, Slovakia and the United Kingdom. Globally the company employed 50,200 in 2016 and reported an annual revenue of $14 billion. Its 973,000-square-foot meat-processing plant in Tar Heel, North Carolina, was said in 2000 to be the world's largest, slaughtering 32,000 pigs a day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gestation crate</span> Metal enclosure used in intensive pig farming

A gestation crate, also known as a sow stall, is a metal enclosure in which a farmed sow used for breeding may be kept during pregnancy. A standard crate measures 6.6 ft x 2.0 ft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive animal farming</span> Branch of agriculture

Intensive animal farming, industrial livestock production, and macro-farms, also known as factory farming, is a type of intensive agriculture, specifically an approach to animal husbandry designed to maximize production while minimizing costs. To achieve this, agribusinesses keep livestock such as cattle, poultry, and fish at high stocking densities, at large scale, and using modern machinery, biotechnology, and global trade. The main products of this industry are meat, milk and eggs for human consumption. There are issues regarding whether intensive animal farming is sustainable in the social long-run given its costs in resources. Analysts also raise issues about its ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ractopamine</span> Animal feed additive

Ractopamine is an animal feed additive used to promote leanness and increase food conversion efficiency in farmed animals in several countries, but banned in others. Pharmacologically, it is a phenol-based TAAR1 agonist and β adrenoreceptor agonist that stimulates β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors. It is most commonly administered to animals for meat production as ractopamine hydrochloride. It is the active ingredient in products marketed in the US as Paylean for swine, Optaflexx for cattle, and Topmax for turkeys. It was developed by Elanco Animal Health, a division of Eli Lilly and Company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Large Black pig</span> British breed of domestic pig

The Large Black pig is a British breed of domestic pig. It is the only British pig that is entirely black. It was created in the last years of the nineteenth century by merging the black pig populations of Devon and Cornwall in the south-west with those of Essex, Suffolk and Kent in the south-east. It is hardy, docile and prolific; it forages well and is suitable for extensive farming, but not well suited to intensive management.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impacts of animal agriculture</span> Impact of farming animals on the environment

The environmental impacts of animal agriculture vary because of the wide variety of agricultural practices employed around the world. Despite this, all agricultural practices have been found to have a variety of effects on the environment to some extent. Animal agriculture, in particular meat production, can cause pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, disease, and significant consumption of land, food, and water. Meat is obtained through a variety of methods, including organic farming, free-range farming, intensive livestock production, and subsistence agriculture. The livestock sector also includes wool, egg and dairy production, the livestock used for tillage, and fish farming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deep litter</span>

Deep litter is an animal housing system, based on the repeated spreading of straw or sawdust material in indoor booths. An initial layer of litter is spread for the animals to use for bedding material and to defecate in, and as the litter is soiled, new layers of litter are continuously added by the farmer. In this fashion, a deep litter bedding can build up to depths of 1–2 meters. "The usual procedure for built-up floor litter is to start with about 4 inches (100 mm) of fine litter material with additions of 1 to 2 inches later as needed without removal of the old. A depth of 6 to 12 inches is maintained by partial removals from time to time." Many consider this to be a natural means to disposing of animal feces. "The deep litter cultivation is a modern ecological breeding technique based on decomposing feces by microbiological methods, a post processing method for poultry Manure."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manure management</span> Agricultural practice

Manure management refers to capture, storage, treatment, and utilization of animal manures in an environmentally sustainable manner. It can be retained in various holding facilities. Animal manure can occur in a liquid, slurry, or solid form. It is utilized by distribution on fields in amounts that enrich soils without causing water pollution or unacceptably high levels of nutrient enrichment. Manure management is a component of nutrient management.

Risk assessment for organic swine health is the process of evaluating the likelihood and potential impact of various factors that may affect the health and well-being of organic swine. Risks associated with organic swine farming may differ to those associated with non-organic swine farming, and is of increasing relevance due to growth in the sector. While organic swine farming makes up a small share of U.S. swine farming overall, numbers have increased significantly in recent years. Additionally, non-certified organic swine herds are not accounted in official statistics. Consumer demand, stemming from the larger organic agriculture movement has helped spur growth in this industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of pig farming</span> Damages caused by pig farming to the environment

The environmental impact of pig farming is mainly driven by the spread of feces and waste to surrounding neighborhoods, polluting air and water with toxic waste particles. Waste from pig farms can carry pathogens, bacteria, and heavy metals that can be toxic when ingested. Pig waste also contributes to groundwater pollution in the forms of groundwater seepage and waste spray into neighboring areas with sprinklers. The contents in the spray and waste drift have been shown to cause mucosal irritation, respiratory ailment, increased stress, decreased quality of life, and higher blood pressure. This form of waste disposal is an attempt for factory farms to be cost efficient. The environmental degradation resulting from pig farming presents an environmental injustice problem, since the communities do not receive any benefit from the operations, and instead, suffer negative externalities, such as pollution and health problems. The United States Agriculture and Consumer Health Department has stated that the "main direct environmental impact of pig production is related to the manure produced.

Muyuan Foodstuff is a Chinese food company specializing in pork production. As of 2019, Muyuan slaughters approximately five million pigs per year. They operate the world's largest pig farm.