1934 Turkish Resettlement Law

Last updated

The 1934 Resettlement Law (also known as Law no. 2510) was a policy adopted on 14 June 1934 by the Turkish government that set forth the basic principles of migration. [1] Joost Jongerden wrote that the law constituted a policy of forcible assimilation of non-Turkish minorities by forced and collective resettlement. [2]

Contents

Background

There were other resettlement policies during the end of the Ottoman Empire. From 1910 onwards, the empire began to establish immigrant commissions that regulated the settlement of the immigrants from the Balkans, who were not allowed to exceed 10% of the local population. [3] Kurds who were resettled from Eastern Anatolia to the west were also split into groups not exceeding 300 people, and tribal leaders were separated from their tribe. Also, Kurds were not to make up more than 5% of the local population in the regions to which they were resettled. [3] A previous settlement law from May 1926 (also known as Law no. 885) regulated the abolition of small villages and the resettlement of their population to central locations. A March 1933 decree also demanded resettlement of the population in mountain areas to central locations. [4]

Resettlement Law

The Resettlement Law of 1934 was passed by the Turkish National Assembly on 14 June 1934. The law was made public and put into effect after it was published in the Resmi Gazete a week after its promulgation. [2] According to the Interior Minister Şükrü Kaya: [5]

This law will create a country speaking with one language, thinking in the same way and sharing the same sentiment.

The law tooj into consideration security and political concerns by closing strategic regions of the country to settlement of non-Muslim minorities. [6] Turkish politicians understood that many non-Turks had been resettled on their own into separate villages and so had not assimilated into Turkishness. [7] Those individuals who "spoke alien dialects" had been able to differentiate themselves from the Turkish nation. It was deemed necessity to assess those villages in which such "alien dialects" were spoken and to distribute populations that spoke the "alien dialects" to nearby Turkish villages to force assimilation. [7]

Under Article I of the law, the Minister of Interior was granted the right to govern and redistribute the interior population of the country in accordance with an individual's adherence to Turkish culture. [8] Article 11 was a provision regarding that the resettlement must assure [9]

unity in language, culture and blood.

The settlement zones were divided in three separate zones according to the adherence of Turkish culture in the each particular individual: [10]

In Paragraph 4 of Article 10, the Ministry of Interior was granted the authority to transfer individuals who did not possess a certain degree of "Turkish culture" to Zone 2, where forced assimilatory practices would take place. [11]

According to Article 12, individuals who did not speak Turkish and were in Zone 1 and were not transferred Zone 2 had to be be settled in villages, towns and districts that had a preexisting dominance of Turkish culture to foster assimilation. [11] Kurds who had been resettled would not have been allowed to constitute more than 5% of the population in the regions to which they have been resettled. [12] More than half-a-million Kurds have been resettled with the law from the Zone 3 to the Zone 2. [12]

The law also required the resettlement of Muslim minorities such as Circassians, Albanians and Abkhazes, who were considered Muslims failing to adhere fully to the Turkish nation. [13] Although those minorities shared the same faith as their Turkish counterparts, it was still considered the goal, by Turkish politicians to bind all peoples of Turkey to become Turkish. [14] The logistical difficulties of resettling all non-Turkish populations into majority-Turkish areas caused the law to be implemented mainly during Kurdish uprisings.

East-Thracian events

Although the Law on Settlement was expected to operate as an instrument for the Turkification of the mass of non-Turkish speaking citizens, it immediately emerged as a piece of legislation that sparked riots against non-Muslims, as evidenced in the 1934 Thrace pogroms in the immediate aftermath of the law's passage. Law No. 2510 was issued on 14 June 1934, and the Thrace pogroms began just over a fortnight later, on 3 July. The incidents seeking to force out the region's non-Muslim residents first began in Çanakkale, where Jews received unsigned letters telling them to leave the city, and then escalated into an antisemitic campaign involving economic boycotts and verbal assaults as well as physical violence against the Jews living in the various provinces of Thrace. [15]

It is estimated that out of a total 15,000 to 20,000 Jews living in the region, more than half fled to Istanbul during and after the incidents. [16] However, although the Law on Settlement may well have actually provoked the outbreak of the riots, the national authorities did not side with the attackers but immediately intervened in the incidents. After order had been restored, the governors and mayors of the provinces involved were removed from office. [17] Many Turkishs from Anatolia were resettled in Eastern Thrace in 1934. [18]

Dersim rebellion

The law played a major role in the events leading to the Dersim rebellion in 1937. Forced resettlement was used in the depopulation of Dersim, in eastern Turkey in 1937-1938, where, according to McDowall, 40,000 people were killed. [19] According to official Turkish reports, in the 17 days of the 1938 offensive alone, 7,954 persons were reported killed or caught alive. [20] As the people who were caught alive were a minority, it can be concluded that almost 10 percent of the entire population of Tunceli was killed. [20] The Kurds claim that their losses were even higher.

The 1934 Turkish Resettlement Law was the legal justification used for the forced resettlement. It was used primarily to target the region of Dersim as one of its first test cases and left disastrous consequences for the local population. [21]

In a report delivered to the Republican People's Party (CHP) after the Dersim Rebellion, the law was described as an effective vehicle for the Turkification of the eastern provinces and the destruction of a united Kurdish territory. It was also demanded that further resettlements should take place to ensure that the Turkish population woud rise to 50% in the eastern provinces. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tunceli</span> Municipality in Tunceli Province, Turkey

Tunceli is a municipality (belde) in Tunceli District and capital of Tunceli Province, Turkey. The city has a Kurdish majority. It had a population of 35,161 in 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diyarbakır Province</span> Province of Turkey

Diyarbakır Province is a province and metropolitan municipality in southeastern Turkey. Its area is 15,101 km2, and its population is 1,804,880 (2022). The provincial capital is the city of Diyarbakır. The Kurdish majority province is part of Turkish Kurdistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hakkâri Province</span> Province of Turkey

Hakkâri Province, is a province in the southeast of Turkey. The administrative centre is the city of Hakkâri. Its area is 7,095 km2, and its population is 287,625 (2023). The current Governor is Ali Çelik. The province encompasses 8 municipalities, 140 villages and 313 hamlets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mardin Province</span> Province of Turkey

Mardin Province is a province and metropolitan municipality in Turkey. Its area is 8,780 km2, and its population is 870,374 (2022). The largest city in the province is Kızıltepe, while the capital Mardin is the second largest city.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bitlis Province</span> Province of Turkey

Bitlis Province is a province of eastern Turkey, located to the west of Lake Van. It takes its name from the central city, Bitlis. Its area is 8,294 km2, and its population is 353,988 (2022). The province is considered part of Western Armenia by Armenians. The province is considered part of Turkish Kurdistan and has a Kurdish majority. The current Governor of the province is Erol Karaömeroğlu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siirt Province</span> Province of Turkey

Siirt Province, is a province of Turkey, located in the southeast. The province borders Bitlis to the north, Batman to the west, Mardin to the southwest, Şırnak to the south, and Van to the east. Its area is 5,717 km2, and its population is 331,311 (2022). Its capital is Siirt. It encompasses 12 municipalities, 280 villages and 214 hamlets.

Turkification, Turkization, or Turkicization describes a shift whereby populations or places receive or adopt Turkic attributes such as culture, language, history, or ethnicity. However, often this term is more narrowly applied to mean specifically Turkish rather than merely Turkic, meaning that it refers more frequently to the Ottoman Empire's policies or the Turkish nationalist policies of the Republic of Turkey toward ethnic minorities in Turkey. As the Turkic states developed and grew, there were many instances of this cultural shift.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nazımiye</span> Municipality in Tunceli Province, Turkey

Nazımiye is a municipality (belde) and seat of the Nazımiye District of Tunceli Province in Turkey. It had a population of 1,262 in 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temporary Law of Deportation</span> Relocation and Resettlement Law in the Ottoman Empire

The Temporary Law of Deportation, also known as the Tehcir Law, or officially by the Republic of Turkey, the "Sevk ve İskân Kanunu" was a law passed by the Ottoman Council of Ministers on May 27, of 1915 authorizing the deportation of the Ottoman Empire's Armenian population. The resettlement campaign resulted in the deaths of anywhere between 800,000 and over 1,500,000 civilians, in what is commonly referred to as the Armenian genocide. The bill was officially enacted on June 1, 1915, and expired on February 8, 1916.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dersim massacre</span> Turkish military operations, 1937–1938

The Dersim massacre was carried out by the Turkish military over the course of three operations in the Dersim Province against Kurdish Alevi rebels and civilians in 1937 and 1938. Although most Kurds in Dersim remained in their home villages, thousands were killed and many others were expelled to other parts of Turkey. Twenty tons of “Chloracetophenon, Iperit and so on” were ordered and used in the massacre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Şırnak Province</span> Province of Turkey

Şırnak Province is a province in Turkey in the Southeastern Anatolia Region. Şırnak Province was created in 1990, with areas that were formerly part of the Siirt, Hakkâri and Mardin Provinces. It borders both Kurdistan Region of Iraq and Syria. The current Governor of the province is Cevdet Atay.

The Surname Law of the Republic of Turkey is a law adopted on 21 June 1934, requiring all citizens of Turkey to adopt the use of fixed, hereditary surnames. Prior to 1934, Turkish families in the major urban centres had names by which they were known locally, and were used in similar manner to a surname. The Surname Law of 1934 enforced the use of official surnames but also stipulated that citizens choose Turkish names. Until it was repealed in 2013, the eldest male was the head of household and Turkish law appointed him to choose the surname. However, in his absence, death, or mental incapacitation the wife would do so.

The 1934 Thrace pogroms were a series of violent attacks against Jewish citizens of Turkey in June and July 1934 in the Thrace region of Turkey. One of the main crucial factors behind the events was the Resettlement Law passed by the Turkish Assembly on 14 June 1934.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xenophobia and discrimination in Turkey</span>

In Turkey, xenophobia and discrimination are present in its society and throughout its history, including ethnic discrimination, religious discrimination and institutional racism against non-Muslim and non-Sunni minorities. This appears mainly in the form of negative attitudes and actions by some people towards people who are not considered ethnically Turkish, notably Kurds, Armenians, Arabs, Assyrians, Greeks, Jews, and peripatetic groups like Romani people, Domari, Abdals and Lom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Place name changes in Turkey</span> Overview of geographical name changes in the Republic of Turkey

Place name changes in Turkey have been undertaken, periodically, in bulk from 1913 to the present by successive Turkish governments. Thousands of names within the Turkish Republic or its predecessor the Ottoman Empire have been changed from their popular or historic alternatives in favour of recognizably Turkish names, as part of Turkification policies. The governments have argued that such names are foreign or divisive, while critics of the changes have described them as chauvinistic. Names changed were usually of Armenian, Greek, Georgian, Laz, Bulgarian, Kurdish (Zazaki), Persian, Syriac, or Arabic origin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tunceli Province</span> Province of Turkey

Tunceli Province, formerly Dersim Province, is a province in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Its central city is Tunceli. The province is considered part of Turkish Kurdistan and has a Kurdish majority. Moreover, it is the only province in Turkey with an Alevi majority. The province has eight municipalities, 366 villages and 1,087 hamlets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mahmut Esat Bozkurt</span> Turkish politician

Mahmut Esat Bozkurt was a Turkish jurist, politician, government minister and academic. His birth name was Mahmut Esat. But after the adaptation of the Turkish Surname Law in 1934, he chose the surname Bozkurt in remembrance of the Grey Wolf, a symbol for Turkdom. The surname also refers to the Turkish steamer S.S. Bozkurt in the Lotus case. He was in the intellectual environment of the Turkish Hearths for almost two decades.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Late Ottoman genocides</span> 1913–1924 Armenian, Greek, and Assyrian genocides

The late Ottoman genocides is a historiographical theory which sees the concurrent Armenian, Greek, and Assyrian genocides that occurred during the 1910s–1920s as parts of a single event rather than separate events, which were initiated by the Young Turks. Although some sources, including The Thirty-Year Genocide (2019) written by the historians Benny Morris and Dror Ze'evi, characterize this event as a genocide of Christians, others such as those written by the historians Dominik J. Schaller and Jürgen Zimmerer contend that such an approach "ignores the Young Turks' massive violence against non-Christians", in particular against Muslim Kurds.

The Fourth Inspectorate-General refers to a regional administrative subdivision in the Dersim region.

References

  1. Çağatay, Soner 2002 'Kemalist dönemde göç ve iskan politikaları: Türk kimliği üzerine bir çalışma' (Policies of Migration and Settlement in the Kemalist Era: A Study on Turkish Identity), Toplum ve Bilim, no. 93, pp. 218-41.
  2. 1 2 Jongerden, Joost (2007). The settlement issue in Turkey and the Kurds : an analysis of spatial policies, modernity and war ([Online-Ausg.] ed.). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. ISBN   9789004155572.
  3. 1 2 Jongerden (2007), pp. 178-179
  4. Jongerden, Joost (2007). The Settlement Issue in Turkey and the Kurds: An Analysis of Spatical Policies, Modernity and War. BRILL. pp. 177–178. ISBN   978-90-04-15557-2.
  5. TBMM Zabıt Ceridesi, Devre: IV, Cilt: 23, İçtima: 3, 14/06/1934, p.71.
  6. Icduygu, A., Toktas, S., & Soner, B. A. (2008). The politics of population in a nation-building process: Emigration of non-Muslims from turkey. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(2), 358-389. doi : 10.1080/01419870701491937
  7. 1 2 Bayrak, Mehmet (1992). Kürtler ve ulusal-demokratik mücadeleleri üstüne : gizli belgeler, arastırmalar, notlar (in Turkish) (1. baskı ed.). Ankara: Özge. p. 508. ISBN   9789757861010.
  8. ‘İskan Kanunu’, no: 2510, 14/06/1934, Düstur, Tertip: 3, Cilt: 15, p. 1156.
  9. 1/335 Numaralı İskan Kanunu Layihası ve İskan Muvakkat Encümeni Mazbatası’ In TBMM Zabıt Ceridesi, Devre: IV, Cilt: 3, Ek: 189, 02/05/1932, p. 11.
  10. İskan Kanunu’, no: 2510, 14/06/1934, Düstur, Tertip: 3, Cilt: 15, p. 1156.
  11. 1 2 İskan Kanunu’, no: 2510, 14/06/1934, Düstur, Tertip: 3, Cilt: 15, pp. 1158-1160.
  12. 1 2 Sagnic, Ceng (July 2010). "Mountain Turks: State ideology and the Kurds in Turkey" (PDF). Information, Society and Justice: 127–134. ISSN   1756-1078.
  13. Gülalp, Haldun (2009). Citizenship and Ethnic Conflict: Challenging the nation-state. Routledge. ISBN   9781134203819.
  14. TBMM Zabit Ceridesi, Session IV, vol. 23, addenda 189, p. 6.
  15. Levi, Avner. 1998. Turkiye Cumhuriyetinde Yahudiler (Jews in the Republic of Turkey), Istanbul: Iletisim Yayınları
  16. Karabatak, Haluk 1996 ‘Turkiye azınlık tarihine bir katkı: 1934 Trakya olayları ve Yahudiler’ (A contribution to the history of minorities in Turkey: the 1934 Thracian affair and the Jews), Tarih ve Toplum, vol. 146, pp. 68-80.
  17. Toprak, Zafer. 1996 ‘1934 Trakya olaylarında hukumetin ve CHP’in sorumlulugu (Government responsibility and the CHP in the 1934 Thracian incidents), Toplumsal Tarih, vol. 34, pp. 19-25.
  18. Resmi Gazete 21 June 1934 (in Turkish) Retrieved 25 June 2012
  19. David McDowall, A modern history of the Kurds, I. B. Tauris, 2002, ISBN   978-1-85043-416-0, p. 209.
  20. 1 2 The Suppression of the Dersim Rebellion in Turkey (1937-38); p. 4
  21. George J. Andreopoulos (1997). Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 11. ISBN   0-8122-1616-4.
  22. Üngör, Ugur Ümit (1 March 2012). The Making of Modern Turkey: Nation and State in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1950. OUP Oxford. p. 161. ISBN   978-0-19-164076-6.

Turkish Government Sources