Annunciation (Memling)

Last updated

The Annunciation, 76.5 x 54.6 cm (30 .mw-parser-output .frac{white-space:nowrap}.mw-parser-output .frac .num,.mw-parser-output .frac .den{font-size:80%;line-height:0;vertical-align:super}.mw-parser-output .frac .den{vertical-align:sub}.mw-parser-output .sr-only{border:0;clip:rect(0,0,0,0);clip-path:polygon(0px 0px,0px 0px,0px 0px);height:1px;margin:-1px;overflow:hidden;padding:0;position:absolute;width:1px} 1/8 x 21 1/2 in.), Hans Memling, 1480s, oil on panel (transferred to canvas), Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Annunciation Memling.jpg
The Annunciation, 76.5 × 54.6 cm (301⁄8 × 211⁄2 in.), Hans Memling, 1480s, oil on panel (transferred to canvas), Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

The Annunciation is an oil painting by the Early Netherlandish Painter Hans Memling. It depicts the Annunciation, the archangel Gabriel's announcement to the Virgin Mary that she would conceive and become the mother of Jesus, described in the Gospel of Luke (Luke 1:26 ). The painting was executed in the 1480s and was transferred to canvas from its original oak panel sometime after 1928; it is today held in the Robert Lehman collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.

Contents

The panel shows Mary in a domestic interior with two attendant angels. Gabriel is dressed in ecclesiastical robes, while a dove hovers above Mary, representing the Holy Spirit. It expands upon the Annunciation wing of Rogier van der Weyden's Saint Columba Altarpiece of c. 1455. According to the art historian Maryan Ainsworth, the work is a "startlingly original image, rich in connotations for the viewer or worshiper". [1]

The iconography focuses on the Virgin's purity. Her swoon foreshadows the Crucifixion of Jesus, and the panel emphasizes her role as mother, bride, and Queen of Heaven. The original frame survived until the 19th century and was inscribed with a date believed to be 1482; modern art historians have suggested that the number's final digit was a 9, which would give a date of 1489. In 1847, the art historian Gustav Friedrich Waagen described the panel as one of Memling's "finest and most original works". [2] In 1902, it was exhibited in Bruges at the Exposition des primitifs flamands à Bruges , after which it underwent cleaning and restoration. The banker Philip Lehman bought it in 1920 from the Radziwiłł family, in whose collection it might have been since the 16th century; Antoni Radziwiłł discovered it on a family estate in the early 19th century. At that time, it had been pierced through with an arrow and required restoration.

Description

Subject

Robert Campin's c. 1420s Merode Altarpiece, (The Cloisters), with conventional iconography of a hearth and a vase of flowers Robert Campin - Triptych with the Annunciation, known as the "Merode Altarpiece" - Google Art Project crop.jpg
Robert Campin's c. 1420s Mérode Altarpiece , (The Cloisters), with conventional iconography of a hearth and a vase of flowers

The Annunciation was a popular theme in European art, [3] although a difficult scene to paint, because it depicts Mary's union with Christ as she becomes the tabernacle for the Word made flesh. The doctrine of Mary as Theotokos, the God-bearer, was affirmed in 431 at the Council of Ephesus; two decades later the Council of Chalcedon affirmed the doctrine of Incarnation  – that Christ was of two natures (God and Man) – and Mary's perpetual virginity was affirmed at the Lateran Council of 631. In Byzantine art, Annunciation scenes depict the Virgin enthroned and dressed in royal regalia. [4] In later centuries she was shown in enclosed spaces: the temple, the church, the garden. [5]

Left panel of Rogier van der Weyden's Saint Columba altarpiece, c. 1455, Alte Pinakothek, Munich. Rays of light stream through the open window toward the Virgin. Rogier van der Weyden 008.jpg
Left panel of Rogier van der Weyden's Saint Columba altarpiece , c. 1455, Alte Pinakothek, Munich. Rays of light stream through the open window toward the Virgin.

In Early Netherlandish art the Annunciation is typically set in contemporary domestic interiors, a motif and tradition established by Robert Campin, and followed by Jan van Eyck and Rogier van der Weyden. [1] Neither Campin nor van Eyck went so far as to set the scene in a bedchamber, [4] although the motif is found in van der Weyden's Louvre Annunciation of c. 1435 and his Saint Columba Altarpiece of c. 1455, in which the Virgin kneels by the nuptial bed, rendered in red made from costly pigments. [6] Memling's depiction of the scene is nearly identical to that in the Saint Columba Altarpiece. [7]

Figures

The archangel Gabriel appears before Mary to announce that she will bear the Son of God. [8] He is shown standing in a three-quarter view, [9] wearing a small jeweled diadem and dressed in vestments. He has a richly embroidered red-and-gold brocade cope, edged with a pattern of gray seraphim and wheels, over a white alb and amice. He holds his staff of office in one hand, and raises the other towards the Virgin. [10] He bends his knees, honoring and acknowledging her as Mother of Christ and Queen of Heaven, [1] and his feet are bare and positioned slightly behind hers. [11]

The Virgin is in a frontal view; [9] directly behind her the red-curtained bed acts as a framing device, similar to the traditional canopy of honor or baldachin. [6] Unlike in the work of Memling's predecessors, whose Virgins are garbed in heavily jeweled and costly robes, the plain white shift she wears beneath a blue mantle is minimally jeweled at the hem and at the open neckline. A purple underdress peeks out at her neck and wrists, indicating her royal status. [5] Mary seems neither surprised nor fearful at the announcement; according to the art historian Shirley Neilsen Blum the scene is rendered with a great sense of naturalism and successfully depicts "the transformation of Mary from girl to God-bearer". [11]

Jan van Eyck's Annunciation, from the 1432 Ghent Altarpiece, has an inscription streaming towards the Virgin and the dove of the Holy Spirit hovers above. Jan van Eyck - The Ghent Altarpiece - Mary of the Annunciation - WGA07679.jpg
Jan van Eyck's Annunciation, from the 1432 Ghent Altarpiece , has an inscription streaming towards the Virgin and the dove of the Holy Spirit hovers above.

The Virgin holds an innovative and unusual position. She seems to be either rising or swooning as if having lost her balance, a divergence from her conventional seated or kneeling pose. Blum believes "one may search in vain in other Netherlandish Annunciation panels of the fifteenth century of a Virgin positioned as she is here". [6] The art historian Penny Jolly suggests that the painting shows a birthing position, a motif with which van der Weyden experimented in his Seven Sacraments Altarpiece , where the Virgin's collapse results in a childbirth-like posture, and in his Descent from the Cross , which has Mary Magdalene bending and crouching – similar to the position Memling's Magdalene assumes in his Lamentation . [12] Flanking the Virgin, and holding her, are two attendant angels. The one to the left lifts the Virgin's robe while the other gazes at the viewer, "soliciting our response", according to Ainsworth. [1] Both are small-statured, solemn, and, according to Blum, in mood "comparable to that of Gabriel". [13] Other than the presence of the angels, Memling shows a typical upper-merchant-class 15th-century Flemish bedchamber. [4]

Objects

A dove, representing the Holy Spirit, hovers inside a rainbow-hued circle of light directly above the Virgin's head. Its placement and size are unusual for art of the period. It is unlike anything found in van der Weyden, and is never repeated in Memling's work, but reminiscent of van Eyck's dove in the Ghent Altarpiece's Annunciation panel. [10] Its shape is found in medallions hung above beds at that time, and thus seems in keeping with the domestic interior. [4] Mary's left hand rests on an open prayer book, which she has propped open on a prie-dieu , with the letter "D" visible – perhaps for Deus tecum ("the Lord be with you"), according to Ainsworth. [1] Blum speculates that the passage is from Isaiah 7:14, "Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bear a son". [11] A vase containing white lilies and a single blue iris is next to it on the floor. [14]

A curtain sack, commonly found on beds of the period, hangs in the central axis between Gabriel and the attendant angel. [15] A sideboard beside the bed contains two types of candles and a flask of water standing in bright light falling from the window to the left. [1] The floor is multi-colored tile-work, similar to that in van der Weyden's Saint Columba Altarpiece; Memling truncates the ceiling rafters in the mid-ground, at the end of the bed, with the floor extending into the foreground. Blum describes the effect as acting "like an open stage for the holy figures". [9]

Iconography

The iconography is not overly labored, and Memling avoids extraneous symbolism. [11] Many elements emphasize Mary's role as the Mother of God; the chamber is furnished with simple everyday objects that indicate her purity. The vase of lilies and the items on the sideboard are objects 15th-century viewers would have associated with her. [8] White lilies were often used to signify her purity, while irises or sword lilies were used as metaphors for her suffering. [14] Memling emphasizes symbols associated with her womb and virginity, "introduces two additional angelic priests, and floods the room with natural light, thereby rearranging the anecdotal to emphasize the doctrinal meaning". [11] Charles Sterling describes the work as "one of the finest examples of Memling's ability to take a pictorial convention inherited from his predecessors and infuse it with a heightened sense of emotion and narrative complexity". [16]

Light

Detail showing the light shining on the sideboard, a flask of clear water, a ropewick light, a candlestick, and a curtain-sack Annunciation Memling - detail.jpg
Detail showing the light shining on the sideboard, a flask of clear water, a ropewick light, a candlestick, and a curtain-sack

From the 9th century Light became associated with Mary and the Incarnation. Millard Meiss notes that from the 12th century a common way to convey the conception was to compare light passing through glass to the passage of the Holy Spirit through the body of the Virgin. [17] Saint Bernard likened it to sunshine, explaining in this passage: "Just as the brilliance of the sun fills and penetrates a glass window without damaging it, and pierces its solid form with imperceptible subtlety, neither hurting when entering nor destroying when emerging; thus the word of God, the splendor of the Father, entered the virgin chamber and then came forth from the closed womb." [18]

Three objects on the bedside cabinet represent the Virgin's purity: the water flask, the candleholder, and the ropewick light. The light passing through the glass of the womb-shaped flask symbolizes her flesh, pierced by divine light; [19] its clear and undisturbed water represents her purity at the moment of conception, [1] a device found also in the earlier paintings as a metaphor of the Virgin's sanctity. [20] The flask shows a reflection of the window's crossbar as a cross, a symbol of the Crucifixion – another small detail in which Memling "lays one translucent symbolic form upon another". [19]

Dieric Bouts's Annunciation, c. 1450s, Getty Center, Los Angeles, omits rays of light. Bouts, Dieric - The Annunciation - Google Art Project.jpg
Dieric Bouts's Annunciation, c. 1450s, Getty Center, Los Angeles, omits rays of light.

Light represented by candles was then often used to symbolise the Virgin and Christ; both Campin and van Eyck placed hearths or candles in their annunciation scenes. [20] The candleholder without a candle and the ropewick without flame symbolize the world before Christ's Nativity and the presence of his divine light, according to Ainsworth. [1]

The challenge for painters of the Annunciation was how to visually represent the Incarnation, the Word made flesh, or Logos . [21] They often showed rays of light emanating from Gabriel or a nearby window entering Mary's body to depict the concept of Christ "who inhabited and passed through her body". The light rays might sometimes include an inscription, [19] and were sometimes shown entering her ear, in the belief that it was thus the Word became flesh. [22]

Memling did not depict the light as distinct rays, nor had Dieric Bouts's Getty Annunciation. Yet the room is bright, filled with sunlight, a fenestra incarnationis, which would have been an adequate symbol for the contemporary viewer. [23] By the mid-15th century the Virgin is found depicted in a room or chamber near an open window to permit the passage of light. [22] Memling's room, with its window through which light streams, is a most "decorous sign of Mary's chastity", according to Blum. [23] There are no word scrolls or banderoles to indicate the Virgin's acceptance, yet her consent is obvious through her pose, which seems, according to Sterling, both submissive and active. [24]

Mother of Christ

The Boucicaut Master's "Visitation" (c. 1405) is a rare example of Mary with attendant angels who touch her garments. Boucicaut hours visitation (2).jpg
The Boucicaut Master's "Visitation" (c. 1405) is a rare example of Mary with attendant angels who touch her garments.

The Virgin birth is indicated by the red bed and red womb-shaped curtain-sack. During the early 15th century hanging beds or curtain-sacks became symbols of the Incarnation, and "served to affirm [Christ's] humanity". Blum notes that at a time "when artists did not hesitate to depict the breast of the Virgin, Memling did not shun her womb". [15] Christ's humanity was a source of fascination, and it was only in Netherlandish art that a solution was found for visualizing his embryonic state with curtain-sacks draped to suggest the shape of a womb. [25]

Mary's body becomes the tabernacle holding the Host made flesh. [10] She becomes an object of devotion, a "monstrance containing the Host". [1] Her full belly and the presence of the dove indicate that the moment of Incarnation has occurred. Viewers would have been reminded of the Crucifixion and Lamentation with the swoon, "thus anticipating Christ's sacrifice for the salvation of mankind at the moment of his conception". [1] According to theologians, Mary stood with dignity at the Crucifixion of Jesus, but in 15th-century art she is depicted swooning, according to Jolly, "in agony at the sight of her dying son ... assuming the pose of a mother in the throes of the pain of childbirth". At the cross she felt the pain of his death, pain which at his birth she had not experienced. [12]

Stefan Lochner, The Virgin Crowned by Angels, c. 1450, Cleveland Museum of Art, depicts the Virgin as Queen of Heaven with two barely visible attendant angels hovering above her crown. Stefan Lochner The Virgin Crowned by Angels, c. 1450.jpg
Stefan Lochner, The Virgin Crowned by Angels, c. 1450, Cleveland Museum of Art, depicts the Virgin as Queen of Heaven with two barely visible attendant angels hovering above her crown.

The painting's domestic setting belies its liturgical meaning. The dove is a reminder of the Eucharist and Mass. Lotte Brand Philip observes how throughout the 15th century "eucharistic vessels made in the form of doves and suspended over altars ... were lowered at the moment of transubstantiation"; here it suggests that in the same way the Holy Spirit gives life to the bread and wine, it gave life to the Virgin's womb. [10] She carries the Body and Blood of Christ, and is attended by three priestly angels. [10] Mary's function is to bear "the Savior of the World"; the angels' role is to "support, present and protect her sacred being". [5] With the birth of Christ her "miraculous womb passed its final test" to become an object of veneration. [4]

Bride of Christ

Memling presents the Virgin as the Bride of Christ about to assume her role as Queen of Heaven, with attendant angels indicating her royal status. [24] Angels of this kind are usually shown hovering above the Virgin, holding her crown, and some German painters showed them hovering close in Annunciation scenes, but angels rarely approach or touch the Virgin. [26] Only a single previous version of such attendant angels has been found: in the Boucicaut Master's early 15th-century illuminated manuscript version of the "Visitation", the pregnant Virgin's long mantle is held by attendant angels, about which Blum notes that "her queenly appearance surely commemorates the moment when Mary is first addressed as Theotokos, the Mother of the Lord". [5] Memling often depicted pairs of angels dressed in vestments attending the Virgin, but these two, dressed in simple amices and albs, were never repeated in his art. Their dual function is to "present the eucharistic offering and proclaim the Virgin bride and queen". [5]

Style and influence

Clugny Annunciation, c. 1465-1475, Workshop of Rogier van der Weyden or by Hans Memling, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Clugny Annunciation.jpg
Clugny Annunciation, c. 1465–1475, Workshop of Rogier van der Weyden or by Hans Memling, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

The Annunciation draws heavily on van der Weyden's Louvre Annunciation (1430s), his Saint Columba Altarpiece (c. 1455), and the Clugny Annunciation (c. 1465–1475), which is attributed either to van der Weyden or to Memling. [1] Memling almost certainly was apprenticed to van der Weyden in Brussels until he set up his own workshop in Bruges sometime after 1465. [27] Memling's Annunciation is more innovative, with motifs such as the attendant angels that were absent in the earlier paintings. [1] According to Till-Holger Borchert, not only was Memling familiar with van der Weyden's motifs and compositions, but he might have assisted with the underdrawing in van der Weyden's workshop. [27] The shutters on the right are copied from the Louvre panel, and the knotted curtain appears in the Saint Columba triptych's "Annunciation". [6]

A sense of movement is conveyed throughout. The trailing edges of Gabriel's garment fall outside the pictorial space, indicating his arrival. The Virgin's "serpentine" pose, with attendant angels supporting her, adds to the sense of flow. [16] Memling's use of color achieves a startling effect. The traditional rays of light are replaced with light color indicators; the white clothes rendered in "icy" blue, the angel to the right in yellow patches seems "bleached by light", and the left-hand angel appears to be steeped in shadow, dressed in clothes of lavender and bearing deep green wings. The effect is iridescent, according to Blum, who writes, "this shimmering surface gives [the figures] an unearthly quality, separating them from the more believable world of the bedchamber". [9] The effect deviates from the pure naturalism and realism which typifies Early Netherlandish art, causing a "startling" juxtaposition, an effect that is "unsteadying" and contradictory. [28]

Center panel, Annunciation Triptych, Rogier van der Weyden, c. 1430s, Louvre, Paris Rogier van der Weyden - The Annunciation - WGA25591.jpg
Center panel, Annunciation Triptych , Rogier van der Weyden, c. 1430s, Louvre, Paris

Scholars have not established whether the panel was meant to be a single devotional work, or part of a larger, and now broken up, polyptych. According to Ainsworth, its size and "the sacramental nature of its subject would have been appropriate for a family chapel in a church or monastery for the chapel of a guild corporation". [1] An intact, inscribed frame is unusual for a wing panel, indicating that it was probably intended as a single piece, [2] but scholars are unsure because the slight left-to-right axis of the tiles suggests that it could have been the left-hand wing of a larger piece. [16] There is no information about the panel's reverse, which has not survived. [2]

Technical analysis shows extensive underdrawing, typical for Memling. This was completed in a dry medium, except for the dove and the flask and candles on the sideboard. Revisions during the final painting included the enlargement of the Virgin's sleeves and the repositioning of Gabriel's staff. Incisions were made to indicate the floor tiles and the dove's position. [29]

The only person to question Gustav Friedrich Waagen's 1847 attribution to Memling is W. H. J. Weale, who in 1903 declared that Memling "would never have dreamt of introducing into the representation of this mystery these two sentimental and affected angels". [30]

Provenance and condition

The painting's known provenance begins in the 1830s when it was in the possession of the Radziwiłł family. [1] According to the art historian Sulpiz Boisserée, who saw the painting in 1832, Antoni Radziwiłł found the painting in an estate his father owned. Waagen speculated that may have belonged to Mikołaj Radziwiłł (1549–1616), who might have inherited it from his brother Jerzy Radziwiłł (1556–1600), who was a cardinal. [31] The family kept it until 1920 when Princess Radziwiłł sold it to the Duveen Brothers in Paris. [1] The American investment banker Philip Lehman bought it in October 1920; it is now held in the Robert Lehman collection at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York. [1]

Generally the condition is good. Memling painted the work on two panels of about 28 cm each. The dated and inscribed frame, probably the original, was discarded in 1830. [29] There have been three documented restorations. The painting had been pierced by an arrow when Antoni Radziwiłł found it; he had it restored and the damage repaired. At that time the Virgin's mantle and the flesh tones sustained heavy overpainting. The original frame was discarded, but its inscription was inserted into the new frame. [24] A description of the original frame suggests that it bore a coat of arms, perhaps belonging to Jerzy Radziwiłł. [31] The second restoration was after its exhibition in Bruges in 1902, and the third when Lehman had it restored and transferred to canvas sometime after 1928. The painting survived the transfer without significant damage. A late 19th-century photograph shows wood on all four sides of the painted surface, which suggests that the edges may have been extended during the transfer. Areas that suffered paint loss and overpainting are Gabriel's cope and the vase holding the flowers. [29]

When Boisserée saw the painting he recorded the inscription's date as 1480. The last digit of the inscription was faded and difficult to read and had become illegible by 1899. Waagen suggested that the date could have been 1482, and the art historian Dirk de Vos suggested 1489. [2] Memling's style does not lend itself well to assigning dates, making a determination difficult. According to Sterling, an earlier date is easily accepted, especially because of stylistic similarities to Memling's 1479 St John Altarpiece , [2] whereas Ainsworth leans toward the later date as more in keeping with the mature style of the late 1480s. [1]

Related Research Articles

Hans Memling was a German-Flemish painter who worked in the tradition of Early Netherlandish painting. Born in the Middle Rhine region, he probably spent his childhood in Mainz. During his apprenticeship as a painter he moved to the Netherlands and spent time in the Brussels workshop of Rogier van der Weyden. In 1465 he was made a citizen of Bruges, where he became one of the leading artists and the master of a large workshop. A tax document from 1480 lists him among the wealthiest citizens. Memling's religious works often incorporated donor portraits of the clergymen, aristocrats, and burghers who were his patrons. These portraits built upon the styles which Memling learned in his youth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early Netherlandish painting</span> Work of artists active in the Low Countries during the 15th- and 16th-century Northern Renaissance

Early Netherlandish painting is the body of work by artists active in the Burgundian and Habsburg Netherlands during the 15th- and 16th-century Northern Renaissance period, once known as the Flemish Primitives. It flourished especially in the cities of Bruges, Ghent, Mechelen, Leuven, Tournai and Brussels, all in present-day Belgium. The period begins approximately with Robert Campin and Jan van Eyck in the 1420s and lasts at least until the death of Gerard David in 1523, although many scholars extend it to the start of the Dutch Revolt in 1566 or 1568–Max J. Friedländer's acclaimed surveys run through Pieter Bruegel the Elder. Early Netherlandish painting coincides with the Early and High Italian Renaissance, but the early period is seen as an independent artistic evolution, separate from the Renaissance humanism that characterised developments in Italy. Beginning in the 1490s, as increasing numbers of Netherlandish and other Northern painters traveled to Italy, Renaissance ideals and painting styles were incorporated into northern painting. As a result, Early Netherlandish painters are often categorised as belonging to both the Northern Renaissance and the Late or International Gothic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mérode Altarpiece</span> 15th-century painting by the workshop of Robert Campin

The Mérode Altarpiece is an oil on oak panel triptych, now in The Cloisters, in New York City. It is unsigned and undated, but attributed to Early Netherlandish painter Robert Campin and an assistant. The three panels represent, from left to right, the donors kneeling in prayer in a garden, the moment of the Annunciation to Mary, which is set in a contemporary, domestic setting, and Saint Joseph, a carpenter with the tools of his trade. The many elements of religious symbolism include the lily and fountain, and the Holy Spirit represented by the rays of light coming through from the central panel's left hand window.

<i>Beaune Altarpiece</i> 15th-century Netherlandish painting

The Beaune Altarpiece is a large polyptych c. 1443–1451 altarpiece by the Early Netherlandish artist Rogier van der Weyden, painted in oil on oak panels with parts later transferred to canvas. It consists of fifteen paintings on nine panels, of which six are painted on both sides. Unusually for the period, it retains some of its original frames.

<i>The Magdalen Reading</i> Fragment of altarpiece painting by Rogier van der Weyden

The Magdalen Reading is one of three surviving fragments of a large mid-15th-century oil-on-panel altarpiece by the Early Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden. The panel, originally oak, was completed some time between 1435 and 1438 and has been in the National Gallery, London since 1860. It shows a woman with the pale skin, high cheek bones and oval eyelids typical of the idealised portraits of noble women of the period. She is identifiable as the Magdalen from the jar of ointment placed in the foreground, which is her traditional attribute in Christian art. She is presented as completely absorbed in her reading, a model of the contemplative life, repentant and absolved of past sins. In Catholic tradition the Magdalen was conflated with both Mary of Bethany who anointed the feet of Jesus with oil and the unnamed "sinner" of Luke 7:36–50. Iconography of the Magdalen commonly shows her with a book, in a moment of reflection, in tears, or with eyes averted.

<i>Braque Triptych</i> Altarpiece by Rogier van der Weyden

The Braque Triptych is a c. 1452 oil-on-oak altarpiece by the Early Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden. When open, its three half-length panels reveal, from left to right, John the Baptist, The Virgin Mary with Jesus and Saint John the Evangelist, and on the right, Mary Magdalene. When the wings are closed, the work shows a vanitas motif of a skull and cross.

<i>Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin</i> Painting by Rogier van der Weyden

Saint Luke Drawing the Virgin is a large oil and tempera on oak panel painting, usually dated between 1435 and 1440, attributed to the Early Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden. Housed in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, it shows Luke the Evangelist, patron saint of artists, sketching the Virgin Mary as she nurses the Child Jesus. The figures are positioned in a bourgeois interior which leads out towards a courtyard, river, town and landscape. The enclosed garden, illusionistic carvings of Adam and Eve on the arms of Mary's throne, and attributes of St Luke are amongst the painting's many iconographic symbols.

<i>Miraflores Altarpiece</i> c. 1442 painting by Rogier van der Weyden

The Miraflores Altarpiece is a c. 1442-5 oil-on-oak wood panel altarpiece by the Early Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden, in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin since 1850. The three panels are each 71 x 43 cm and show, from left to right, a portrait of the Holy Family, a Pietà and Christ's appearance to Mary—a chronological reading of the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus, with Mary the focus of both wings. The altarpiece examines Mary's relationship with Christ at different stages of his life. It is notable for its use of colour, distinguished by its use of whites, reds and blues, and use of line—notably the line of Christ's body in the central panel—and, typically of van der Weyden, its emotional impact.

<i>Madonna in the Church</i> Small oil panel by Jan van Eyck

Madonna in the Church is a small oil panel by the early Netherlandish painter Jan van Eyck. Probably executed between c. 1438–1440, it depicts the Virgin Mary holding the Child Jesus in a Gothic cathedral. Mary is presented as Queen of Heaven wearing a jewel-studded crown, cradling a playful child Christ who gazes at her and grips the neckline of her red dress in a manner that recalls the 13th-century Byzantine tradition of the Eleusa icon. Tracery in the arch at the rear of the nave contains wooden carvings depicting episodes from Mary's life, while a faux bois sculpture in a niche shows her holding the child in a similar pose. Erwin Panofsky sees the painting composed as if the main figures in the panel are intended to be the sculptures come to life. In a doorway to the right, two angels sing psalms from a hymn book. Like other Byzantine depictions of the Madonna, van Eyck depicts a monumental Mary, unrealistically large compared to her surroundings. The panel contains closely observed beams of light flooding through the cathedral's windows. It illuminates the interior before culminating in two pools on the floor. The light has symbolic significance, alluding simultaneously to Mary's virginal purity and God's ethereal presence.

<i>Durán Madonna</i>

Durán Madonna is an oil on oak panel painting completed sometime between 1435 and 1438 by the Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden. The painting derives from Jan van Eyck's Ince Hall Madonna and was much imitated subsequently. Now in the Prado, Madrid, it depicts a seated and serene Virgin Mary dressed in a long, flowing red robe lined with gold-coloured thread. She cradles the child Jesus who sits on her lap, playfully leafing backwards through a holy book or manuscript on which both figures' gazes rest. But unlike van Eyck's earlier treatment, van der Weyden not only positions his Virgin and Child in a Gothic apse or niche as he had his two earlier madonnas, but also places them on a projecting plinth, thus further emphasising their sculptural impression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Master of the Prado Adoration of the Magi</span>

The Master of the Prado Adoration of the Magi was a Netherlandish painter active between c. 1475 and 1500 whose identity is now lost. He is thought to have originated from the southern Netherlands and is known for his vibrant colourisation in panels depicting scenes from the infancy of Christ, he is thought to have been a pupil of Rogier van der Weyden, and is named after a copy of the "Adoration of the Magi" panel from that painter's St Columba Altarpiece. Although the Magi became a popular topic for northern painters in the second half of the 15th century and the Columba altarpiece was widely copied, the master is associated with van der Weyden's workshop because the copy is so close, it is believed he must have had access to a reproduction of the underdrawing.

<i>Virgin and Child Enthroned</i> c. 1433 painting attributed to Rogier van der Weyden

The Virgin and Child Enthroned is a small oil-on-oak panel painting dated c. 1433, usually attributed to the Early Netherlandish artist Rogier van der Weyden. It is closely related to his Madonna Standing, completed during the same period. The panel is filled with Christian iconography, including representations of prophets, the Annunciation, Christ's infancy and resurrection, and Mary's Coronation. It is generally accepted as the earliest extant work by van der Weyden, one of three works attributed to him of the Virgin and Child enclosed in a niche on an exterior wall of a Gothic church. The panel is housed in the Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza in Madrid.

<i>Nativity</i> (Christus) Oil on wood panel painting by Petrus Christus

The Nativity is a devotional mid-1450s oil-on-wood panel painting by the Early Netherlandish painter Petrus Christus. It shows a nativity scene with grisaille archways and trompe-l'œil sculptured reliefs. Christus was influenced by the first generation of Netherlandish artists, especially Jan van Eyck and Rogier van der Weyden, and the panel is characteristic of the simplicity and naturalism of art of that period. Placing archways as a framing device is a typical van der Weyden device, and here likely borrowed from that artist's Altar of Saint John and Miraflores Altarpiece. Yet Christus adapts these painterly motifs to a uniquely mid-15th century sensibility, and the unusually large panel – perhaps painted as a central altarpiece panel for a triptych – is nuanced and visually complex. It shows his usual harmonious composition and employment of one-point-perspective, especially evident in the geometric forms of the shed's roof, and his bold use of color. It is one of Christus's most important works. Max Friedländer definitely attributed the panel to Christus in 1930, concluding that "in scope and importance, [it] is superior to all other known creations of this master."

<i>St John Altarpiece</i> (Memling) Altarpiece by Hans Memling

The St John Altarpiece is a large oil-on-oak hinged-triptych altarpiece completed around 1479 by the Early Netherlandish master painter Hans Memling. It was commissioned in the mid-1470s in Bruges for the Old St. John's Hospital (Sint-Janshospitaal) during the building of a new apse. It is signed and dated 1479 on the original frame – its date of installation – and is today still at the hospital in the Memling museum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Master of the Legend of Saint Catherine</span>

The Master of the Legend of Saint Catherine is the notname for an unknown late 15th century Early Netherlandish painter. He was named after a painting with Scenes from the Legend of Saint Catherine, now kept in the Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium. He was active between c. 1470 and c. 1500, probably around Brussels.

<i>St John Altarpiece</i>

The St John Altarpiece is a c. 1455 oil-on-oak wood panel altarpiece by the Early Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden, now in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin. The triptych is linked to the artist's earlier Miraflores Altarpiece in its symbolic motifs, format and intention.

<i>Mystic Marriage of St. Catherine</i> (Memling) Painting by Hans Memling

The Mystic Marriage of St. Catherine is a c. 1480 oil-on-oak painting by the Early Netherlandish painter Hans Memling, now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. The Virgin Mary sits on a throne in a garden holding the Child Jesus in her lap. Mother and child are flanked by angels playing musical instruments, with St Catherine of Alexandria to the left opposite St Barbara on the right. The male figure standing slightly behind the celestial group, presumably commissioned the painting as a devotional donor portrait.

<i>Saint Columba Altarpiece</i> Altarpiece painted by Rogier van der Weyden

The Saint Columba Altarpiece is a large c. 1450–1455 oil-on-oak wood panel altarpiece by Early Netherlandish painter Rogier van der Weyden painted during his late period. It was commissioned for the church of St. Columba in Cologne, and is now in the Alte Pinakothek, Munich.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bladelin Altarpiece</span>

The Bladelin Altarpiece, or Middelburg Altarpiece, is a triptych painting created around 1450 by the Flemish painter Rogier van der Weyden, towards the end of his artistic career. It depicts scenes relating to the birth of Jesus; and as the only nativity scene definitively attributed to van der Weyden is sometimes known as the Nativity Triptych.

<i>Pagagnotti Triptych</i>

The Pagagnotti Triptych is an oil-on-wood triptych by Hans Memling produced circa 1480. The original was disassembled and separated, with the center panel held at the Uffizi gallery in Florence and the two wing panels at the National Gallery in London.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Ainsworth (1998), 118
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Sterling (1998), 81
  3. ↑ "The Annunciation". Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Blum (1992), 52
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Blum (1992), 53
  6. 1 2 3 4 Blum (1992), 43
  7. ↑ Snyder (1987), 38
  8. 1 2 Howard (2000), 353
  9. 1 2 3 4 Blum (1992), 55
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Blum (1992), 49
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Blum (1992), 50
  12. 1 2 Jolly (2014), 40, 57
  13. ↑ Blum (1992), 54
  14. 1 2 Blum (1992), 48
  15. 1 2 Blum (1992), 44
  16. 1 2 3 Sterling (1998), 80
  17. ↑ Meiss (1945), 177
  18. ↑ Meiss (1945), 176
  19. 1 2 3 Blum (1992), 46
  20. 1 2 Meiss (1945), 175
  21. ↑ Koslow (1989), 10
  22. 1 2 Meiss (1945), 178
  23. 1 2 Blum (1992), 47
  24. 1 2 3 Sterling (1998), 83
  25. ↑ Koslow (1989), 11–12
  26. ↑ Sterling (1998), 82
  27. 1 2 Borchert (2008), 87
  28. ↑ Blum (1992), 56
  29. 1 2 3 Sterling (1998), 78
  30. ↑ Weale (1903), 35
  31. 1 2 Sterling (1998), 84

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.